AR Clearing with different doc #
Hello Experts.
Please let me know how to get the different clearing doc # and Accouting Doc#
For Ex : i have posted the customer Invoice using FB70 after that i have cleared using tcode F-28.
When i cleared the open item clearing doc # and accouting doc # are same. but my requiement is i should get diffrent numbers.
Thanks
Guru
Dear
But i do not want seprate document in seprate vendor line item clearing
please suggest how to clear without clearing document genrate
tks
Similar Messages
-
Posting of cross company transaction with different doc types
Hi,
The scenario is:-
We have two companies X and Y.
X makes a payment to Y with the following FI entries:-
Company Code X
Dr Vendor Y
Cr Bank HDFC
Company Code Y
Dr Bank ICICI
Cr Customer X
Now this needs to be a cross company transaction where the doc type for CC X should be vendor Payment 'KZ' while the doc type for CC Y should be a customer reciept with doc type 'DZ'.
Although I am able to map the accounts in cross company code config I am not able to split the transaction of different company codes with different document types.
Is there any way we can do this in standard SAP?
Thanks in advance,
NitishHi
As per your issue ...There are no possibilities to post in sap with different document types.
If you want you can post cross company code transactions with one document types
Regards
vamsi -
PR generated with different doc type in rollout porject ....why?
Dear Friends.
We have done rollout.
Earlier imlementation - c. code=A200 .
Using standard document type-NB for PR generation.
Latest Rollout - c. code =A100
Using copy of standard document type NB as ZNB for PR generation.
My problem is that when in A100 MRP runs it generates PR with doc. type-NB (NOT ZNB) why?
same way PR generated by Plant maintanace module(PM) in doc.type-NB(Not ZNB) why?
Regards,
Mahesh.Hi,
Check the below path of configuration, PR created with MRP run have different document type.
SPROMM-Consumption based planningplanningprocurement proposalDefine external procurement.
Hope it will help you
Thanks -
F-03 Acc.Clear with Purchasing Doc. line item variant
Dear All,
I like to ask about T.Code F-03 Clear G/L Account
Execute the report with specific accounting document number, and process the open item
after the report shows list of open item for the specific document, I choose line item variant "Purchasing Document"
and it goes blank, no purchasing document appear there, though the accounting document does have information for purchasing document number.
Have no idea for this problem
please help
thank you
rgds,
DickyHi Dicky,
In order to use the fields in F-03, these fields must exist in BSIS (secondary index for GL line items). As EBELN or EBELP aren´t in BSIS the data is not shown at
F-03 as you mentioned.
You can add this field into BSIS, but please note that additing this field to BSIS is considered a modification.
Please chcek note 493238 which describes how to make this modification. Please be aware that if any assistance required to implement this note must be carried out with a consulting resource.
Additionally please check the note 62435.
Please assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni -
Unable to clear vendor with different currency being posted
Dear Experts,
One of our vendor's Invoice billed in currency USD, several payments has been posted with different currency according to our Bank currencies. Full payment has been made to the balance of ZERO, but we still unable to clear this vendor account. Any expert can help me how to clear the above mentioned vendor.
Regards/LisaHi,
Please check whether the customisation for exchange difference accounting has been done. If so then
T Code is F-44 or F-04
Either use Local Currency. : In this case if there is any exchange rate difference between the invoice and payment date the difference will be posted to exchange diff account.
Or Use the Doc Currency : In this case you can provide the exchange rate in the transaction so that you will not get any exchange rate difference.
Hope this solves your issue.
Regards
MPI -
I have 2? How do I sync selected photos from my IPad to my IMac w/o losing all photos on my IPad which will be replaced with the photos on my IMac.You see I have two IMacs with different sets of photos. Also want to convert all Apple works docs to pages docs on my IMac. Is there and app available to do the former. many thanks. b
The iPad and related software is designed to sync with only one computer. I suggest transferring the photos from one of your iMacs to the other so that all photos are on one Mac. Same for all other files you want to sync over.
To get those AppleWorks files to the iPad you'll have to determine if Pages will open them. If it will then use the file sharing feature of iTunes to copy them to Pages on your pad.
If Pages will not open the AppleWorks files directly you'll have to save them in some format that Pages will read. These include but may not be limited to Pages and Word formats. -
Photoshop 2014.2 bug with duplicating layers in different doc
Encountered an issue with Photoshop 2014.2 that occurs when I try to use some_basic_bitmap_layer.duplicate(some_layer_in_different_doc, ElementPlacement.PLACEAFTER). So this is code that has been pretty much unchanged for a year and works in CS6 and CC2012 and used to worked in CC2014.1. I use .duplicate() with docs and with layers inside same doc, but this is the one giving exception:
General Photoshop error occured. This functionality may not be available in this version of Photoshop.
- The object " <unknown> of layer 2" is not currently available
Another strange thing is is that in ESTK debugging the exception surfaced in a bit different places depending on factoring. I.e. before I added more detailed exception catching, it occured later in code. But this place is the only spot there is a layer named "layer 2". But gives me the feeling it's an internal state corruption
I'm guessing it might so specific no-one else will hit it, but I'd like to ask
- Any workarounds you can think of?
- Any ways to directly escalate it to Adobe given it's a new release. The general feedback site seems a waste of effort.
- Any way to downgrade (in a way that normal users could do it also) to 2014.1?Thanks for the feedback!
The sample code is meant for the sample psd, so it's playing on assumption that there is only one layer that is not background, is visible and not locked. In the production code it's always inside a group so it's not a background and we check for locked. Visibility we don't check but it has not been the case in the PSDs we've replicated this in.
However playing with this I did manage to find a workaround: it's possible to duplicate the layer to beginning of doc and then move it like below.
try {
var original_doc = app.activeDocument
var copy_doc = original_doc.duplicate("copy_doc", false) // duplicate original
var export_doc = app.documents.add(original_doc.width, original_doc.height, original_doc.resolution, "export_doc", NewDocumentMode.RGB, DocumentFill.TRANSPARENT) // create empty export doc
app.activeDocument = copy_doc // select copy and first layer of it
var layer = copy_doc.artLayers[0]
// create dummy layer to merge to to flatten all vector & style data
var tmp_layer = copy_doc.artLayers.add()
tmp_layer.move(layer, ElementPlacement.PLACEAFTER)
layer = layer.merge()
var duplicate = layer.duplicate (export_doc , ElementPlacement.PLACEATBEGINNING)
app.activeDocument = export_doc
var dummy = export_doc.artLayers.add()
var target = export_doc.artLayers.add()
duplicate.move(target, ElementPlacement.PLACEAFTER)
} catch (e) {
alert(e.message)
} finally {
copy_doc.close(SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES)
export_doc.close(SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES)
Also if I try to move duplicated layer without setting the active document Photoshop raises the same exception "The object " <unknown> of layer 2" is not currently available". I.e. it's hitting some internal issue instead of giving the right error of "not allowed to move layers in non-selected document". It kind of makes sense, i.e. duplicating to different doc after certain layer is a combo operation that duplicates to different doc and moves and they different requirements (what is the active doc). -
Can we clear more line items with different currency within one Vendor
Dear All,
Please guide us the following issue is
Can we clear two line items with different currency within one Vendor (i.e., Down Payment entry passed in EUR and Invoice in JPY).
Thanks in advance.
Regards
SrinivasHi
I suppose this should be possible in F-44, for any difference in forex enter a new line item 'Charge off diff.' to Dr/Cr Forex gain/loss account
Thank You, -
Users will use form to fill in stats for enquiries so they want to keep form open, complete a form, click button to submit by email, then click another button to clear form, form now ready to accept form's responses. They dont' want to keep opening form each time form needs to be completed.
Hope you help.
Thanks SandraHi,
Thanks for your response, not sure what you mean by a loop. I put together
a draft form to show staff in our Knowledge Centre the sort of thing
Livecycle Designer can do.
(See attached file: Library Request Form_pub_0001.pdf)
They are currently writing out on form and manually putting into excel to
keep stats on the requests.
Due to current Global Financial Crisis my section does not want to spend
extra money at the moment seeking assistance from our tech heads. So we
are looking for least work no expense option for keeping stats. I am a PA
who just happens to have Livecycle program on my computer.
We use Lotus Notes so I thought the staff could save copy of Library
request form in the stationery folder. The staff using the form want to be
able to do the following:
1. open the Library request form at the beginning of the day;
2. when a request comes in, complete the form and click on Send by email
button
3. click on a Clear Data button to clear all data from all fields so the
form is open ready for when the next request comes in.
Staff are time poor and, as this is only one of their numerous duties, they
don't want to keep going to a location and opening a file which can be very
slow on some days
Each day form may be filled out by approximately 15 staff who may receive
anything from 0 - 4 requests a day.
I am not a tech head so script writing is a deep, dark mystery. Can you
help using the form above as an example for achieving step 3 above.
Thanks,
Sandra Smith
Personal Assistant
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia
Office: ++61 (2) 8266 9069
Fax: ++61 (2) 8286 9069
[email protected]
http://www.pwc.com/au
Kacyndra
<[email protected]
> To
Sandra K Smith/AU/TLS/PwC@AsiaPac
08/08/2009 12:25 cc
AM
Subject
Livecycle
Please respond to Designer 8 - Is it possible to have
clearspace-200985 button to clear fields after user
0098-481178-2-216 has clicked submit by email button
[email protected]. so user can reuse form to send
adobe.com another response with different
answers?
if i understand this correctly, you just want everything cleared whena
buttons is pressed?
you can either do it individually:
on button click:
mytextField.rawData=""
or do a loop, using child/paretns.. -
How do I send docs to multiple signators with different email addresses on Echo sign ?
How do I send docs to multiple signators with different email addresses on Echo sign ?
Thanks man...the problem could be on the signators side.
Rick Schell...Realtor, ABR
www.rick-the-realtor.com
Cell 615-804-3085
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office 615-373-3513
Fax 615-373-5228
Quoting Echosign-Rob <[email protected]>:
Echosign-Rob created
the discussion
"How do I send docs to multiple signators with different email
addresses on Echo sign ?"
To view the discussion, visit:
https://forums.adobe.com/message/6395941#6395941
> -
MIRO - additional costs - 2 acc. docs with different dates
Dear SAP Experts!
I have the following issue.
Case description:
On March 19 2008 my Customer entered additional costs in MIRO for material A. The document Invoice date and Posting date (as well as BaselineDt) on the header were entered as 29.02.2008
The way the additional costs were entered without purchase order reference, directly to Material Account using Material Tab.
The additional cost was entered for the ammount of material that was at that (29.02) moment on stock. (however there were some movements - sales and returns between 29.02 and 19.03)
The issue is - 2 accounting documents were created:
- one conatining postings to Vendor, Tax and Material accounts - with Invoice date and Posting date as entered in MIRO - both 29.02.2008
- second containing postin to Stock Account - Cr & Price Difference account - Db. however the dates that appear are Document date - 29.02.2008, Posting date 01.03.2008
So the first document goes to Period 2 and the second to Period 3.
Cutomer asks me for explanation.
The questions are:
1. Is this the way standard system works?
2. Why 2 accounting documents were created?
3. Why they were created with different Posting dates?
4. Why there were any postings done on Price Differences account if the additional costs were posted to the ammount that was on stock at the time?
5. Even if there is a logic that the date is different - why it was 01.03.2008 at this case not 10 or 19.03.2008 for example?
6. How does the system calculates the ammount that is posted to the Stock Difference accoun?
Thank you very much in advance for your advice!Hi
1) PO quantity 100 unit. GR 40 unit and IR time also 40 unit.
This will post automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. The subsequent 60 unit in PO will be received in the next GR. is this process correct?
PO 100
GR 40
IR 40
Correct
2) PO quantity 40 unit. GR 100 and IR 100.
This will poat automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. User has to add additional line in PO for 60 units. is this process correct?
PO 40
GR 100
IR 100
You can the same line item of PO And invoice will get blocked.
3) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 50 unit.
Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 50 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header less then total line item value.
GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
May I know what should I do on the difference?
PO 100
GR 100
IR 50
You can post the invoice for 50 units. System will accept it.
4) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 150 unit.
Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 150 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header more than the total line item value.
GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
May I know what should I do on the difference?
PO 100
GR 100
IR 150
Invoice get blocked
Thanks
Raman -
Issue in Data from DSO to DSO Target with different Key
Hello All,
I am having Issue in Data from DSO to DSO Target with different Key
Source DSO has Employee + Wage + Post numner as key and Target has Employee + Wage Type as key.
DSO semantic grouping works like Group By clause in sql, is my understanding right ?
Also if someone can explain this with a small example, it would be great.
Many Thanks
KrishnaDear, as explained earlier your issue has nothing to do with semantic grouping .
Semantic grouping is only usefull when you have written a routine in the transformation for calculations and in error handling .
Please go through this blog which explains very clearly the use of semantic grouping .
http://scn.sap.com/community/data-warehousing/netweaver-bw/blog/2013/06/16/semantic-groups-in-dtp
Now coming to your above question
DSO 1
Employee WageTyp Amount
100 aa 200
200 aa 200
100 bb 400
100 cc 300
If we have semantic group as Employee . If we have Employee as key of the target DSO and update type as summation .
then target DSO will have
Emp Amount
100 700
200 200
In this case Wage type will be the last record arriving from the data package . If the record 100 cc 300 is arrivng last then wage type will be cc .
2) Case 2
DSO 1
Employee WageTyp Amount
100 aa 200
200 aa 200
100 bb 400
100 aa 300
if we do Semantic grouping with Emp and Wage Type If we have Employee and wage type as key of the target DSO and update type as summation .
then target DSO will have
Emp Wage Amount
100 aa 500
200 aa 200
100 bb 400
Hope this helps . -
Clearing with customer & Vendor
I have customer who is vendor and vendor who is customer.I have assigned customer no in vendor master and vice versa. I forgot to click the indication Clearing with cust/vend. I have posted the TRansactions now i Have ticked the Clearing with cust/ Vend.
How to i Set off line item with cust and vendor .
One more thing is in f-32 clear customer we can clear clearing doc. or we can clear open item also and sett off customer and vendor.
As per my knowledge if u do partial payment then my orginal Invoice wil show as open item and one more line item wil b generated with clearing document M I right? Is there any setting in ECC 6. through which partial payment will directly get cleared.
plz need some input regardin clearing doucment
I have tried but unable to come to conclusion
thanks thanks a lot
Regards
AnamikaAnamika
The whole logic of having a partial item is that the open item will remain open until the whole amount is paid. There is no meaning in clearing it completely when there is a partial clearing. For the customer clearing, you select other accounts, select the vendor account and the account type K and clear the open items. Let me know if it helped.
Karthik -
GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items
Hello All,
we have different business areas, and some times we create a PO for all business areas and invoice it in a specific business area
in F.13 automatic clearing:
for GR/IR account
Documents with different business area cannot be cleared.
any idea to solve this issue is appreciated,Thanks for your reply,
I've tried such a solution with more parameters ( EBELN, XREF3 and EBELP)
but in F.13 :
- the document cannot be cleared when >>> selecting GR/IR account special process.
if we treat GR account as a normal GL account, I mean without selecting GR/IR account special process.
the document can be clear
i want to be able to clear the document with selecting GR/IR field ( is it possible )
and if it is not allowed, do we will face a problem by clearing GR account without selecting GR/IR parameter ??
Many Thanks -
Posting date and clearing date different in G/L clearing document
Hi Friends,
While clearing a G/L manually using F-03, the clearing date is entered in the selection screen.
The clearing document which is posted is posted with the posting date same as the clearing date mentioned in the selection screen of F-03.
In what situations can the posting date of a G/l clearing document be different from the clearing date?
Regards,
ShilpiHi,
The Clearing Date in F-03 is actually the Posting date, so in this case the posting date will be same as clearing date. But a clearing document can also be created when you reverse a FI document, in this case the Reversal document will have a clearing date different than posting date. Let me know if this info helps you
Maybe you are looking for
-
LMS 3.2 on Solaris 10 - DFM 3.2 Shows VIP as Duplicate IP
Hi, I have a few alerts created by DFM regarding duplicate ip addresses. It happens that those duplicate ips are in reality virtual ip addresses configured on our load balancers. Is there a way to resolve this issue? Thanks Jose Ribeiro
-
hi, i face problem of printing my PO in duplex mode, i have set the print mode in script as duplex, by it still doesnt come out in duplex. i have tested with SAP standard text :SAPSCRIPT-PRINTMODETEST and it shows correctly that the printer works for
-
Trap the Correct Event to manipulate matrix
Hi expert, another question from me I need to modify value in a standard form (Quotation Form). When the user change the "ItemCode" value I want to change the value in some UDF (User Defined Field) in the row. The UDF i want to change is named "U_II_
-
I want to verify my account !!
i want to verify my account !!
-
Can't install Adobe Acrobat XI
I downloaded the trial version of Adobe Acrobat XI Pro but it do not install, It's given me the command "this app cannot run on your PC". This is a brand new PC that I had to purchase after they stole my previous one. It's a Hewlett Packard Pavilion