Asset-fund management

Hi,
I want to have fund management control in asset accounting. But in integration in fm i am not getting any setting for asset filed as it is for order field. How i can do this.
Thanks

Hi,
Your question is not giving full details of your requirement. For asset you can do following
1. Create commitment item and link it to asset accounts in FMDERIVE.
2. You can activate Asset transactions that can be relevant for FM control.
3. You can Activate Account Assignment Objects for asset acoounting thru path IMG> Financial Accounting (New)> Asset Accounting> Integration with the General Ledger> Additional Account Assignment Objects> Activate Account Assignment Objects.
I hope this will help you.
Warm Regards

Similar Messages

Funds Management and Budget Check on Settlement of Assets

Dear All
We are implementing Funds Management module with BCS as budgetary tool. We have a requirement like this. At the time of PR or PO for AUC, budget need to be checked, whereas at the time of settlement of this AUC to a fixed Asset there should not be any budget check
Kindly let me know whether, this scenario can be mapped in SAP using Funds Management Module
Regards
Vivek MG

Hi,
You can build a derivation rule in FMDERIVE basing it on business transaction field. In case of assets settlement, you can derive a dummy commitment item.
Regards,
Eli

Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.

alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine.

Fund Management

Hello All,
My client has implemented fund management so i need to ask , when i do advance payment to vender against Purchase order then will it affect the find budget.
suggest

Hi,
this is the Fixed Asset Accounting forum, hence not the appropriate one for your inquiry. You should create a thread in the Industry Solution Forum "Public Sector".
Regards,
Markus

What are the expected implications in implentation of Fund Management.

Dear All,
We are in the live Environment of ECC 6.0, currently we have FICO and HR module Implemented. we have been gone live since January 2007.
In FI, we have GL, AR, AP, Fixed Assets. Banking, IM and PS.In treasury we have loan management and Time deposits. In controlling we have Cost Center Accounting, Cost Element Account, Internal orders and some parts of COPA.
Currently MM and PM Implementation is going on, now we are thinking to implement Fund Management to control the budget. (our objective is to control Operational budget)
Can any body guides us with respect to the followings:
what can be the impact of Implementing Fund Management in Live Enivornment? (Please be noted we are using New GL Functonality as well).
How it effects the cost cycles? (we have series of complex Cost Cycles)
Any other impact of Implementing Fund Management?
Regards,

Dear All,
We are in the live Environment of ECC 6.0, currently we have FICO and HR module Implemented. we have been gone live since January 2007.
In FI, we have GL, AR, AP, Fixed Assets. Banking, IM and PS.In treasury we have loan management and Time deposits. In controlling we have Cost Center Accounting, Cost Element Account, Internal orders and some parts of COPA.
Currently MM and PM Implementation is going on, now we are thinking to implement Fund Management to control the budget. (our objective is to control Operational budget)
Can any body guides us with respect to the followings:
what can be the impact of Implementing Fund Management in Live Enivornment? (Please be noted we are using New GL Functonality as well).
How it effects the cost cycles? (we have series of complex Cost Cycles)
Any other impact of Implementing Fund Management?
Regards,

Funds Management -Error

Hi,
I had implemented funds management so while creating normal Purchase order for raw material system is giving below error.
For the particular material i had maintained configuration in FMLF -warehouse integration and derivative rule=valuation class-commoitment item,GL-conmmitment item.
Suggest something.
Item 00010 contains commitment item with financial transaction other than 30
Message no. FICUSTOM000
Diagnosis
Item 00010 contains a commitment item with <DS:GLOS.Financial transaction Financial transaction unequal to 30 (Post revenue, expenses, assets). In Funds Management (and in the Cash Management project) only postings containing the transaction 30 are updated.
Procedure
Check your entry and enter a commitment item with financial transaction 30.
Regards
Deepa

Hi Deepa,
Use transaction FMCIC and enter your FM area. Then enter the this committment item and check there is 30 in the Financial Transaction field. If not then make it so.
System is causing the error because purchase order transaction is allowed for this committment type.
By keeping financial transaction 30 will resolve the issue. You can use FMCIA to change committment item.
If document is posted to this then you will not be able to change then it is better that you create new committment type and start posting.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Funds Management - Commitment items for all GLs

Hello -
When we activate Funds Management, System expects a commitment item for every GL, including Bank accounts and Inventory accounts. I want system to expect commitment item only for expense accounts. How can I Do it. As such, we donu2019t have a budget for bank accounts.
Thanks in advance.
Chris
Edited by: Chris Farr on Nov 24, 2008 12:14 PM

Just read Eli's msg clearly, its mentioned that GLs have to be assigned to Commitment with right category and Fin transacton. Just explored the IDES FM areas 1000,3000 and 4000 and understood the following but with couple of questions ( mentioned below)
Expenditure     30/3
Asset exp                     30/3
GR/IR - Clearing     40/3
Misc clearing      40/3
Liquid funds / Bank a/cs     90/1
All other bank chk pable/ Recbles     80/3
Trade recble     60/2     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
Trade payable     60/3     it make sense, but in FM area 3000, Receivables defined as 30/3 ?
Tax payable     30/2     Why category '2' here?
Input tax                     30/2     Why category '2' here?
WOULD APPRECIATE IF SOMEBODY CAN CLARIFY MY QUESTIONS ABOVE.
Hope this info is useful and not mis guiding
Thanks
Chris

Double Check of Budget in Funds Management at the time of Full Settlement

Hello Experts,
We are in porcess of implementing MYERP2005. Currently we are on 4.7 EXT 1.0.
In 4.7 when we do full settlement the system to the fixed assets the system was configured not to check the budget in Funds Management. The budget is checked at the time creation of PO.
However I have issue with MYERP2005, i.e., when we do the full settlement to the fixed assets it checks the budget again. I know there must be some switch in configuration that allows not to check the budget again at the time of settlement to the fixed assets.
Does any body know where I need to change the configuration?
Thanks for looking into this matter.

Hi
If I can understand you correctly, you are talking about the asset under construction which are done in either PS or Internal Order.
Since the budget is checked up when it hits the PS or internal order, hence it is not required to check up again at the time of settlement.
Since settlement is controlling transaction, remove the relevant controlling business transactions under PSM-FM-Former budgeting->Integration->>
Please Assign Points if the solution is found useful.
Regards,
Suraj

System error in Funds Management update

Dear you,
Have anyone seen the following when updating FM from FI document:
"System error:Funds management update (FMRI, CHECK_WE_RE)"
Any ideas what to do?
Thanks
Sonja

Hi there,
The update problem occurs both if we try to post with FB50L or if I try to make a transfer of FI postings in FM. This all happens in the new installation where we plan to use new GL and FM.
This note you gave did not ring a bell for me
The error message is FI057. But we have not yet found a suitable note.
Therefore any ideas are still welcomed.

Funds management cube getting data from 4 ods, data not seen in cube

Hello all,
I am working on funds management cubes (0PU_C02 and 0PU_C03). These two cubes get data from like 7 or 8 ODS. Can someone tell me which are the ODS which feed to respective cubes. I have the mappings done but i am getting very confused.
In the ods 0PU_O44 there is RLDNR for Ledger and I can see that data in ODS but when i run load to cube I dont see the ledger data (its direct mapping there are no routines or rules).
Is there any sequence with wihic we have to load the data?
Thanks
Message was edited by: Raj M

Hi Raj,
I was going thru the forums who has knowledge in Public sector when i came accross ur forum.Can i get your email id..i have some questions to ask regarding student administration.
thanks.

|Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

I am getting another error in Funds Management:
Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
Message no. FI_E008
Diagnosis
FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
Procedure
Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

Hi,
It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

Hi,
In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
and
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

Hi,
Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ming

Error while Activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM)

Hi,
I am getting the below error while activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) in Funds Management.
Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt
Message no. ZZ003
Kindly help me in fix this issue....
Thanks
Kishore

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. But can you clarify me why we need to delete the row Z_LEAVE in SE11 for FMISPS table. Because here ABAPER is objecting to do this as they feel there may be some impact if we delete this.
Kindly clarify me
Thanks
Kishore

After Funds Management activation we got error in travel managment

Hi All,
After activating funds management in the system, while creating a travel request we got the following error. Anyone can help on this, for idenifying the problem.
In the travel request portal we are getting this error :
" com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException: No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE and No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE "
regards,
Sabari Prabhu.

Hi
I have a question, I udnerstand in (Create one expense type "Estimated Costs") but my question is in using transaction
When you start using the trip transaction and select a travel request the system send you to the TP04 transaction... now
with this new function, I have to use the transaction PR05 its right? becouse the TP04 ask the VORS expense type, and sap says to dont delete record
Please could you tell me with wich transaction you start to create a travel request? I have the same problem of the screen but Im not sure to use the TP04 transaction wit this solution
Thanks a lot

Status of PO becomes F in fund management

Hi,
recently we have upgrade SAP from ECC6 to EHP4 and found some of the PO's Status becomes F in fund management, so we are not able to make service entry sheet and payment as system asking for further budget though actually POs value has not reduced fully.
Plz help to remove the status F from FM so that it can be able to make payment.
P K Sahoo

Hi, try to reconstract PO(I don't remember tcode, but you can find it in spro like M*4N)

Asset-fund management

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for