|Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

I am getting another error in Funds Management:
Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
Message no. FI_E008
Diagnosis
FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
Procedure
Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

Hi,
It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Funds Management related error while creating Purchase Requisition

Hi,
Am working in ECC6.0 system with Funds Management integration. While creating PR am getting below mentioned error
"At least one GL account was not derived by the budgetary ledger
Message no. FI_E034"
Diagnosis
You are using the Funds Management system integrated with the budgetary ledger (BL) active for FM area .
Postings into the budgetary ledger require a GL account for each of the budgetary ledger line items. However,
in this case, at least one of the line items in the BL interface table does not contain a GL account.
Use the link below to analyze the table contents before and after the account derivation process.
Budgetary ledger account derivation trace
System Response
The budgetary ledger cannot post this document. The BL document"
Can some body guide me how to fix this error.
Thanks in advance

hi
which component you are using?
FORMER BUDGETING OR BUDGET CONTROLSYSTEM( BCS)
CHECK YOUR DERIVATION STRATEGY BY USING FMDERIVE.
CHECK DERIVATION RULE FOR BUDGETERY LEDGER AND G/L ACCOUNT.
THANKS & REGARDS
MALA K VUNDELA

Relations with Fund Management and Ledger in General Ledger Accounting

We have already defined Leading Ledger in General Ledger Accounting. After activating the Fund Management, Leading Ledger is not displayed. We can not use FB01, FB03. How can we solve this problem?
Wbr.

Dear expert
use transaction FB01L or Fb03L,
i think You dont need to change any settings, as mentioned above you have to select the respective ledger and post in FB01L or FBO3L
Regards
Ajeesh.s

The application has accessed a fund managements or cash mgt module with par

When I am trying to post a entry Mesage appears F1030
The application has accessed a fund managements or cash mgt module with parameters missinfg or defective
Please solve

Hi,
This error occurs when you post data which is not related to that specific company code.
post the correct data and check.If the problem still exits.Please clearly explain the problem.
Thanks
micheal

Fi - HR integration with respect to ECM with Funds Management

Dear all,
I am involved in the implementation of SAP PCP&S along with ECM.
I know that we can crete the scenario and upload the PCP values in ECM for further budget creation and administration.
NOW from integration point of view I need to have the clarification that what is the role of funds management in it.
I mean Funds management can do the same functionality as well on the basis of fund center assigned to cost center. and same does the Budget unit which is linked to ORG unit and Org unit is lined to Cost center.
I would appreciate if some one to tell me the insight of this process.
Regards

Hi,
There is no integration between Funds Management and ECM. Budgeting in ECM is a tool that acts as a control mechanism for the administration process. You can work with budget allocations, monitor spending, link budgets to the plans, implement warning/error messages for out of limit budgets etc.
The budget units are assigned to the org. hierarchy and subsequently made available during the compensation administration process.
If you are using MSS, we have budgeting BSP with all the related processes.
If you want to import custom values or have a customer specific logic, you can use BAdI HRECM00_BDG0001.
Donnie

Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hello,
We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
Best Regards
Kuldeep

Hi Kuldeep,
There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
Best regards,
Shahaf Yaari
[email protected]

Fund managment exceeding the budgeted and committed items

Dear All,
In my client place we implement the fund management. we create the department wise fund center and related committed items.
For example for the Fund center Administration Expenses- Committed item is Advertising expenses. When ever i made the payment to that particular expenses if i exceed the budgeted amount it will though error .
Like this i am getting for the some of the fund center and commitment items. I am having department wise fund center and commitment items list of 50 under that for 25 fund center whenever i exceed the budget it shows the error message for the some of the fund centers it not showing any warning message. and also allowing to make entries so my fund center report is showing negative values. so please guide to solve this issue.
Regards
girija

Dear Alex,
in my client in Availability control limit
they send for
MSL MSL001 pb selected proceed ++ Action 1 usage % 90
Msl Ms002 Action 3 usage % 100
it is correct or not pl guide to solve this issue for half of the fund center and commitment item when exceed the budget it is through error but for the remaining fund center is is accepting.
Regards,
girija
Edited by: k.r.girija devi devi on Nov 13, 2009 5:14 AM

Mass Write Off - When Funds Management is active

Hi All,
I am working for ISU project and we have a business requirment to do Mass Write Off. We are not able to do it as Funds Management is active.
We had to activate Funds management as we need to send fund related information to Peoplesoft, which is the reporting engine for the client.
We are encountering this error:
Write-off over several fiscal years
Message no. FKKFMCHK038
Diagnosis
You are posting a document similar to a write-off that writes off documents from several fiscal years. This is not possible with the transaction used if Funds Management is active.
If anyone can throw some light on how to slove this, it would grealy help me.
Thanks,
Lalitha

Hi Lalitha,
The reason can be a commitment item with a wrong financial transaction. Therefore please check
the relevant bank clearing account and the assigned commitment item.
The commitment item should have financial transaction 90 in transaction FMCIA.
In the long text of SAP note 686383 you'll find more information regarding this topic. The point 3 under limitations is very
important for the described situation.
I believe this will help you.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

BAPI'S to activate for Funds managment

Hi All,
While creating purchase order we have an error related to Funds managment.
in the program we have the FM 'FM_ACCOUNT_DERIVE'.we have got an error like
funds centre value as taken Current date.
Through this FM only we got the current date value.
SO do we need to activate any relaed BAPI's
Could you please help me.
Thanks.

Hi All,
While creating purchase order we have an error related to Funds managment.
in the program we have the FM 'FM_ACCOUNT_DERIVE'.we have got an error like
funds centre value as taken Current date.
Through this FM only we got the current date value.
SO do we need to activate any relaed BADI's to funds managment.
Could you please help me.
Thanks.

Funds managed by fund managers - CFM/Treasury.

Hi Experts,
Can someone help me on how to maintain details of funds managed by fund managers (external agencies) by investing in many types of financial instruments (securities, money market, derivatives, etc.). At the month-end we will get a report about all the investments made, their base value, market value, etc., based on which we need to calculate fair value gain/loss as well as impairment loss/gain, if any.
Here all the funds are managed by fund managers and accounting part is taken care by custodian bank. Is there any way to upload/maintain such data in SAP Treasury (Transaction Manager) based on an excel sheet.
Can you please guide me which thread is answering queries/clarifications related to SAP FSCM Treasury & Risk Manager / SAP CFM Treasury & Risk Manager.
Really not getting any answere when I am posting it on ERP financials thread.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Mahesh

Hi Kalyan,
Thanks for your reply. We are implementing Treasury modlue and am aware of required configuration for various financial instruments in transaction manager.
- Client is managing some investments on their own for which we are doing required configuration and standard procedure for transaction & position management will be followed.
- Apart from funds managed on their own, external fund managers (multiple) are dealing with financial instruments based on investment mandate given by client and sending monthly reports on investments made, their values, expenses, transaction details, etc., being sent to client in the form of spread sheet.
- Client will also receive a statement from Custodian Bank with details of investments made by each fund manager.
Please clarify on the following:
- As per your reply there are standard BAPIs available for importing transactions to SAP. Fund Managers are investing in various type of financial instruments (securities, money market, forex, etc.) in various currencies.
- To import the investment details using BAPI do I need to make configuration settings for each type of financial instrument.
- The purpose is to arrive at fair value gain/loss and sum up expenses based on reports (spread sheets) received fund managers and pass journal entries.
- There is a requirement for preparation of disclosure reports on various investments based on these details received from custodian bank.
- Reconciliation of reports received from Custodian bank and fund managers.
You may please see my previous message also.
Please get back to me if you have any further clarifications.
with best wishes,
Mahesh

Funds management and project system

hi fico experts
i am new to the fund management and project system
but my client implementing both funds management and project system
can u pls send me the related documents and configuration steps and tables
it is very urgent send me as early as possible
regards
venkataswamy

hi
for Project systems
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MYSAP/SR_PS.pdf
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CAARCPS/CAARCPS.pdf
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PS/PS.pdf
funds management
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/FIFM/FIFM.pdf
nagesh

Usage of FMBV in funds management

Dear Experts
Iam creating one po at the time the following message displayed
ITEM 010 2000 /4105200000/ COMMITMENT BUDGET FOR 2011EXCEED .
But i opened FMBV T code and gave funds management area, fiscal year and commitment item and funds and executed , the problem automatically solved . I dont know what is the relation this t code .
Can any one tell me the usage of FMBV Tcode in funds management ,
Thanks & Regards
Vijay Kumar

Hi,
FMBV executes a program to reconstruct AVC ledger for Former budgeting in FM (for BCS there is a similar transaction FMAVCREINIT). This transaction has to be executed sometimes in oredr to correct inconsistencies in budget control tables.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Management - Reconstruct payment data

Hello,
I have implement Funds Management with Multi-Year Budget Execution and update profile 00101 (posting date) and realize that my commitment item for vendor account was 40 and not 60 so I have some invoices that are not updated with the payment in FM. How can I reconstruct my data? I used the report RFFMRPFI but is not working as I expect. I still have teh invoice open in FM.
Thank you,
Angela Costa

Hi Angela,
There are only 2 ways to make a FI payment be a payment also in FM (value type 57) and it is not related to the financial transaction of the commitment item.
1 - Run of the Payment Selection Program (report RFFMS200)
SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> Funds Management Government -> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration -> Integration -> Define Settings for Payment Transfer
Please check the documentation icon available in front of this line.
2 - Payment Update Online
You check if you are using payment update online in transaction OF29.
It seems to be that you are not using Payment Update online otherwise the value type 57 would be generated automatically in FM table. Therefore, please run the report of item 1.
I dont know in which release you are but from ECC600 on, customers are not allowed to use program RFFMS200 but only use the payment update online.
Therefore, I will give you some additional information regarding Payment Update Online:
CONSULTING NOTES
================
882379 - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
435328 - Analysis programs for the payment update
1234391 - Incorrect payment update in FM or in NewGL split information
1030497 - SAP ERP 6.0: Public sector scenarios in new general ledger
Please check carefully the notes. Since Release EA-PS 6.00, only the online payment update in Funds Management using the new general ledger with document splitting is supported. Therefore, you must have NewGl with document splitting. You will find additional information in the PDF attached and also in the notes mentioned above.
I hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

PSM - Funds Management - Subsequent Posting (transaction FMB0)

Good day to all forumites. I am currently implementing Funds Management at our company (City Power Johannesburg South Africa) an electricity utility. The aim of implementing FM is to activate active availibility control (AVC) for cost center/cost element expenditure. We use cost element/center planning for budgeting purposes and intend to remain so for the future. We are on ECC6 and Funds Management has also been upgraded to the latest version.
I have made the configuration settings as I think best including a full derivation strategy for cost elements/centers to commitment items/funds centers on a one-to-one basis i.e. for every cost element/center combination there is a corresponding entry in table FMFMOACP91000001. This table is created as resut of creating the derivation steps with transactions FMDERIVER.
I have sucessfully transferred all CO Plan Data with transaction FMCYCOPI_CO form CO Planning to FM. My problem arises with the transfer of actual CO postings from CO to FM using transaction FMB0 (subsequent posting). When running a test sample of previously posted documents (in CO) I get error messages which refer to a funds center required in the derivation strategy. The error message isn't very clear to me as I have as stated created a derivation strategy. I am not sure if for e.g. if there is a G/L account as offsetting account in the CO posting document it creates the error message. I have created an additional step in the derivation strategy to link all our gl accounts to one commitment item but this also does not seem to fix the problem.
During the implementaion there have been several instances where notes had to be applied. This was as result of error messages I had encountered during the initial testing after the base configuration had been completed. I am not sure if there could be a program error.
I would appreciate any suggestions/advice on fixing the posting problem.
Best Regards
Mike Olwagen
FICO Functional Analyst
City Power JHB

Hi Eli thank you very much for your help. By activating the trace I have removed half of my error messages. Most of the error messages relate to secondary cost elements which I have assigned per cost center to a generic commitment item and funds center i.e. many to one as suggested in the SAP Help documentation. What now remains is that the second line of a document for e.g. of an entry where an order for e.g. PM Order is referenced as object in the document line. I tried creating a second derivation step with the cost element and PM order field as source fields and a common funds center and commitment item as destination fields. The pm number range is used as the source field range as the numbers are too many for me to make a field entry with each individual pm order number. The error as described above however remains. I am not sure if I am creating the second derivation step incorrectly as it says on the screen the steps have to be in logical ord
Can you perhaps suggest a way forward in terms of a derivation step whereby the system would recognise an order and derive the generic destination field(s) as explained above.
Regards
Mike Olwagen

Funds Management and Fiscal Year Variant Change

Hello !
We are configuring a new fiscal year variant.
Currently, the system is on a CALENDAR YEAR FY variant and we are doing the following:
1. creating a shortened FY of Jan 2009 - Mar 2009
2. new fiscal year from April 2009 - Mar 2010
We are trying to change the FY variant for Funds Management via OF15 but receive the error FI674.
FI674:
You must not change the fiscal year variant in Cash Budget Management or Funds Management for FM area FM01 if actual data already exists for FM area FM01, or if one or more of the company codes assigned to FM area FM01 is active.
We have found oss note 719597 which details how to change the FY variant for Cash Budget Mgmt, but it does not apply to Funds management.
I could find no other supporting documentation.
Can anyone guide us as to how to deal with this issue?
Thank=you !

Hello Patti,
The point is that it is not possible to change fiscal year variant if actual values exists.
You are trying to do a change in January. You probably have some postings in 2009 already.
In the area of PSM-FM there is no note like 719597 of TR-CB.
Only if no actual values exist, this customizing change would be possible and reasonable.
If you are doing this setting in your customizing client, you can delete the postings (please DO NOT do it if you are in production) that exist in 2009 and try again.
SAP do not recommend to change a Fiscal Year Variant that has already been assigned to a company code and has already some postings. This may create database inconsistencies.
You can create another Fiscal Year Variant with the information that you want to be customize, and this variant you will be able to assign to a company code. Before you assign this new variant to a company
code please be sure that none of the information that you already posted in this company code will be affected, this information you may review it with your consultant on-site.
Also please review/apply note 173636, 202687, 10945, 193713, 123026, 210861 which may happen in your system.
The fiscal period is related to the posting date via the fiscal year variant. E.g.: I you do a posting on 5.5.2009 it will be posted e.g. in period 5 for fiscal year variant 'A'. This period is not only used in the document header table (BKPF,VBRK,MKPF ...) but also in several balance table (GLT0, KNC1 ...) not only in FI but also in SD, MM, CO .... If in the new fiscal year variant 'B' this posting date is related to another period e.g. 7 the relation between documents and Periods and balances will be destroyed.
The problem will be enhanced if the posting-date would be related to diffrent fiscal years.
In addition several reports in AP/AR and GL reread period-depend data by selecting the posting-date regardless of the period in the document because it's not normal practise to change the fiscal year variant of a company code.
Some of the involved issues are:
- FM actuals and commitments may need to be reconstructed if their period- (or even fiscal year-) assignments is changed.
- FM actuals/commitments can not be reconstructed if fiscal year change activities have already been performed (commitment carry forward, FMJ1, FMJ2).
- Budgeting data and assigned values may principally be concerned as well, especially if you are working with period values in budgeting.
The change of fiscal year variant has several implications and should be analyzed very carefully.
Please check note below for more information:
Note 672255 Shortened fiscal year / changing fiscal periods
I hope it helps you and good luck
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

|Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for