Auto-mapping (prefix/suffix)

Hi,
how can i change the suffix when i dont define a field mapping. Per
default you add an "x" to the Object Attribute and try to find the field
in the DB. I dont want to have that "x" added to the end.
Thanks. (i really read the docs, but couldnt find it)

You can either specify the column/table name in the metadata:
http://www.solarmetric.com/Software/Documentation/2.4.3/docs/ref_guide_meta_field.html
or you can subclass a DBDictionary's methods to do what you like. I
recommend looking and subclassing/editing one of the DBDictionary
implementations we ship with, as we also provide the source to them.
http://www.solarmetric.com/Software/Documentation/2.4.3/docs/javadoc/com/solarmetric/kodo/impl/jdbc/schema/DBDictionary.html
Marc wrote:
Hi,
how can i change the suffix when i dont define a field mapping. Per
default you add an "x" to the Object Attribute and try to find the field
in the DB. I dont want to have that "x" added to the end.
Thanks. (i really read the docs, but couldnt find it)
Stephen Kim
[email protected]
SolarMetric, Inc.
http://www.solarmetric.com

Similar Messages

XSLT Auto-mapping in 10g

Hi All,
I am working on XSLT in 10g(10.1.3.4), Also I would like to use auto-map option available in Jdev.
currently mapping is done as below,
<ProductName>
<xsl:value-of select="ProductName"/>
</ProductName>
But I would need each node encapsulated with xsl:if, so that epmty node will not present in output doc.
ExampleWith xsl:If
<xsl:if test="ProductName">
<ProductName>
<xsl:value-of select="ProductName"/>
</ProductName>
</xsl:if>
is this auto option is available in 10g?
Please help me to achieve this in 10 g XSLT.
thanks,
Santosh

I think there is a misunderstanding as to what a persistence layer is and does... To update your application with new state, you need to first update your object model (has nothing to do with TopLink), then your application (again, nothing to do with TopLink), and then your mappings and persistence layer code (has to do with TopLink). There is no magic here.
Auto-mapping is a feature in the Mapping Workbench to do much of the tedious O-R mapping automatically. It does not automatically keep your application up to date with schema chages.
- Don

Issue with Update Rollup 5 for Exchange 2010 SP3 - Mailboxes that were auto mapped not working

Below is my response in another thread but creating a new one in the hopes that someone has the same issue and a solution besides mine below.
Ever since we installed Update Rollup 5 for SP3 Exchange 2010 mailboxes that were auto mapped are not accessible. They all get the same error.
Cannot expand the folder. The set of folders cannot be opened. The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange has failed.
What I have been doing is removing the users permission, then adding them back using the noautomap switch in Powershell. After doing that, the user manually adds the mailbox and all is well.
Just a note here, I suspect it may have something to do with the version of Outlook 2010. We are running an older version here. I think only SP1 with no other incremental updates. Office is up to SP2. Also, one of the users I was working with could not access
the mailbox no matter what we tried but she can walk over to another workstation and open Outlook and access the very same mailbox so that pretty much proves its software related particularly with Outlook.
I cannot reproduce the problem on a workstation (XP) with a newer version of Outlook.
This has been wearing me out and I suspected the Update Rollup all long. Now I am confident as others are having the same problem. If you find out anything on how to fix this other than the steps above, let me know.

Not sure why it was suggested to use the auto mapping feature to grant permissions because that is the component that is causing the issue. Also, there is nothing wrong with the auto configuration because the user can access their own mailbox just fine and
also select mailboxes in their Outlook that were NOT auto mapped.
With that said, here is how I fixed them all.
Remove the permissions using the Exchange Console. Don't forget Send As
Wait about 15 minutes. The mailbox should disappear from the users Outlook
Open an Exchange PowerShell window and run the following command:
.\add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1 -Identity mailbox -User user -AccessRights FullAccess
Have the user add the mailbox to their Outlook using the manual process.
All is well....
If you don't have the PS script add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1, you can download it. I stumbled across it a few years ago and use it all the time. If you can't find it, just use the Exchange built in command for adding mailbox folder permissions but
specify automap $false.
The idea here is to grant the user access without auto mapping.

Exchange 2010 Auto-Mapping not removing mailbox from Outlook

I am having an issue that others seem to have as well. When I give Full Access to another mailbox, auto-mapping brings it in to the users Outlook 2010 client. However, when I remove that users access to the shared mailbox it doesn't remove the
mailbox from Outlook.
I know that I can go the shared account in ADSIedit and edit the msExchDelegateListLink and remove the user that should no longer have access, but this is not a good solution. I feel this is a bug that Microsoft should address and release a patch for.
Does anyone know of a fix? Not a workaround, an actual fix?

Hi,
Based on my experience, we can take the following actions to remove the additional mailbox :
1. Turn off the auto-mapping feature for your account:
Add-MailboxPermission usermailbox –user PersonBeingGrantedRights –AccessRights ‘FullAccess’ –AutoMapping:$false
2. Remove the full access permission by using EMC or EMS.
3. Clear the msExchDelegateListLink attribute for all mailboxes which are being displayed as an additional mailbox in Outlook. In your case, you need change 10 msExchDelegateListLink attributes.
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Auto-Mapping Exchange 2013 Mailboxs in an Exchange 2010 Mailbox

We're in the middle of migrating mailboxes from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013. Many of our users have Auto-Mapped mailboxes as well. In my testing, I've found that I cannot Auto-Map a mailbox that's on Exchange 2013 in a Exchange 2010 mailbox. I can manually
add it and it works fine. Is this by design with this type of coexistence or is there a fix for it? Our current Exchange 2010 environment is at SP3 with UR2.
Orange County District Attorney

This issues is fixed in UR5 so suggest you to upgrade Exchange 2010 to SP3 UR5.
Reference Thread: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/a2aa4163-f74b-401f-aec5-13324e6b29c8/exchange-2010-mailbox-not-able-to-access-automapped-exchange-2013-cu3-mailbox?forum=exchangesvradmin
Blog |
Get Your Exchange Powershell Tip of the Day from here

Auto-mapping of shared mailboxes in a resource forest scenario

In a resource forest scenario you assign full access to a shared mailbox using:
Add-MailboxPermission -Identity SharedMailbox -User AccountForestDomain\UserID -AccessRights FullAccess
This provides the user in the account forest full access, but it will NOT auto-map the shared mailbox in Outlook.
If you use the command:
Add-MailboxPermission -Identity SharedMailbox -User UserID -AccessRights FullAccess
and UserID is the disabled account of the linked mailbox in the resource forest then the user in the account forest does not have the necessary permission to
open the mailbox, but the auto-mapping of the mailbox in Outlook works.
You have to use both commands to have the auto-mapping feature and have access to the shared mailbox.
This looks like another issue of the auto-mapping feature. The intention of the feature is good, but the way it was implemented can be improved.
How do you configure full access to shared mailboxes in a resource forest scenario?

Hi J-H,
Because i don’t have such a lab environment, so I am unable to do a test.
Now let’s separate the issue.
1. The first issue is
[email protected]
unable to auto configure outlook profile.
I suggest you
changing the user’s attributes in the account forest, does it work?
2. The second issue is
[email protected] unable to open a shared mailbox in the resource
forest.
At first, I suggest you create a shared mailbox in resource forest with this command.
New-Mailbox -name
<name> -Database <Database name> -OrganizationalUnit Users –UserPrincipalName
<UPN value, example: [email protected]> -<ResourceType: Room, Equipment or Shared>
Managing
Resource Mailboxes in Exchange Server 2007 (Part 1)
Then test if you can log on the shared mailbox via outlook.
If yes, then grant full access right for
[email protected]
to [email protected]
Resource:
Shared mailbox
permission in resource forest with linked users
Manage Full Access Permissions
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Auto-mapping in Toplink

how can TopLink's auto-mapping feature be coded if my application was deployed as a Java project?
the mapping information/descriptors (and all that) are in a java file. I am about to add 2 new fields to my database table, and would like to use TopLink's auto-map feature. Problem is, I don't have the workbench GUI interface.
I have instructions (thanks to Don) on how to map by hand-coding, but if there is a setting that I can code, say a one-liner or so, that would be great.

I think there is a misunderstanding as to what a persistence layer is and does... To update your application with new state, you need to first update your object model (has nothing to do with TopLink), then your application (again, nothing to do with TopLink), and then your mappings and persistence layer code (has to do with TopLink). There is no magic here.
Auto-mapping is a feature in the Mapping Workbench to do much of the tedious O-R mapping automatically. It does not automatically keep your application up to date with schema chages.
- Don

Exchange 2010 mailbox not able to access auto-mapped Exchange 2013 CU3 mailbox

Hi,
We are in co-existence with Exchange 2010 SP3 and Exchange 2013 CU3.
Outlook Anywhere and Autodiscover pointed towards Exchange 2013 CAS servers. Everything works fine irrespective where is mailbox is located Exchange 2010 or 2013.
When I tried to access auto-mapped mailbox from Exchange 2010 as primary mailbox accessing auto-mapped Exchange 2013 mailbox "Cannot expand the folder. The set of folders cannot be opened. Microsoft Exchange is not available. Either there are network
problems or the Exchange server is down for maintenance".
Exchange 2013 OutlookAnywhere "Externalclientauthenticationmethod" is Basic and "Internalclientauthencitcationmethod" is NTLM. Everything is setup as per the Tech-net recommendations.
Checked both these articles but still it is not working:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2839517
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2834139
Please let me know if there are any other ideas.
Raman

Hi,
I recommend you refer to the following articles to troubleshoot the issue:
Troubleshooting Mailbox Auto-Mapping : Autodiscover
Details about the shared mailbox that is to be accessed will be returned to the Outlook client by the autodiscover process. This is really handy to know if you are ever in the position where you need to troubleshoot why the auto-mapping feature isn’t working
correctly
Troubleshooting Mailbox Auto-Mapping : Permissions
When you use either the Exchange Management Console or the Exchange Management Shell to grant a user with full access permission against another mailbox, permissions changes are made to allow this as you might expect. Certain Active Directory attributes
are also updated to reflect both the Active Directory account of the mailbox being accessed as well as the Active Directory account of the accessing mailbox. Specifically, you can check the contents of the msExchDelegateListLink and msExchDelegateListBL Active
Directory attributes to see these details and it is worth checking these if you have any suspicions that things aren’t working correctly.
Hope this helps!
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Let Auto-Map in Transform work with COLLAPSED nodes/tags ?

When I open for a "Transform" activity the mapping editor and drag one complextype from one side to another on the other side then Auto-Mapping only works if the node/tag trees on both elements/sides are full expanded.
If they are collapsed then auto-map does (currently) not work.
Is there a way (option) to tell JDeveloper to look INSIDE collapsed nodes/trees and to auto-map the elements anyway?
Peter

Hi,
Have you checked if the "outside" ACL is getting hitcounts?
Could also be usefull to check the logs through ASDM monitoring and see what happens when you attempt the connection.
The NAT configurations seem correct to me.
Have you tried to test the connections by briefly allowing all traffic from outside? (Since the only place people could connect to is the forwarded ports.) Have you tried to add the current DHCP IP of "outside" to the ACL and see if it makes any difference?
If no configuration change makes a difference I would suggest using the ASDM monitoring to take logs of what happens.
You could also use the "packet-tracer" command
Format is
packet-tracer input outside tcp
And copy/paste the output here.
- Jouni

Posting rule to be specified in target field of mapping area/Mapping prefix in Search string use?

Posting rule change using search string configuration
Hello Friends - I have defined Search string and specified Posting rule in target field of mapping area and set up done on Search search use tab.
When I imported the Statement, based on text found on statement, Posting rule specified in Search string is determined.
I see Search strings already maintained in my system that Posting rule is maintained in Search string use tab - Mapping prefix.
My doubt is that if Posting rule can be maintained in any of the below:
Either at Posting rule to be specified in target field of mapping area or Mapping prefix in Search string use?
Thanks

Hello Kalim - Thanks. I have already configured Search string the way you suggested me last time and imported the statement during testing. It is working fine.
Can you pls tell me in which scenario "mapping prefix field" should be maintained. Now, I will try to understand this from F1 help.
For Search Strings already defined in our System long ago that Posting rule is not specified in Target field in mapping field, but maintained Mapping prefix.
Thanks,
GT

ACS 1121 (5.4) Username Prefix/Suffix Stripping

Hi.
Is it possible to strip the suffix from a username to authenticate against an active directory in ACS 5.4? I can find this when using an external proxy service, but not for network access.
Thanks.

Hey
Username suffix/prefix stripping is possible when using:
LDAP
Radius Identity server
External Proxy
With AD, the option is unavailable.
Self proxy + AD is a workaround but that has some limitations and is a complex configuration.
Rate if Useful :)
Sharing knowledge makes you Immortal.
Regards,
Ed

Media shares auto mapping drive in Windows 8.1 Pro

What setting in Windows 8.1 is causing the automatic mapping of several shared folders named media?
I work in a university environment with staff, faculty, and students using wired and wireless networks. I have a user with a Surface Pro 3 that has started to automatically map, what seems like random addresses on the wireless network, to file shares
named media. When I setup these computers for the users I always have the media sharing turned off and I've never had cause to use it myself so I'm only a little familiar with what the settings do. I've tried to change my own settings to reproduce
the problem but I can't seem to find the correct setting so that I can reverse it. Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks,

Hi Pete de Pistola,
If your machine keeps reconnecting to a map drive, from driver path you should be able to track down which machine is shearing folder. Also since it is a Wifi network we wonder if users could use their own device which is not configured by administrator.
As I know to prevent file sharing, group policy might be the only option.
Enable or disable File Sharing with Group Policy
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754359(WS.10).aspx
Regards

Creating Auto Fill Prefix for filling out forms

I am trying to find a program or a setting in Safari that lets me save different profiles for filling out forms on different websites. I am a realtor who does several reports a week, and it would be nice for auto fill to fill out the form completely and then I can just go back and make a few changes. Is there a way to do this, and can I set up different templates so I can switch the autofill depending on the site / property?

HI,
From your Safari menu bar, click Safari / Preferences then select the Autofill tab. Make sure *Other forms* is selected. Once you've filled out data one any site, Safari should "remember" and autofill for you.
Other than that, you could try the Safari Extensions Gallery here.
Carolyn

Auto-dial prefix, no # or *. Why, Apple, WHY?

I have an iPhone through my employer. Lucky me.
In order to make private calls that are billed to me rather than my employer, I need to add a prefix containing # and *. For some reason, Apple has made this a real pain. The most obvious way to do this would be if the phone simply had a feature to add a prefix to any call. Failing that, a third party app should do the trick (by a button press, by modifying the address book, as a default sequence or a range of similar options).
However, no such feature exists in the phone, and third party apps are not allowed to append # and * to phone numbers.
First, is there any rational explanation for disallowing this? Why are Apple this evil?
Second, is there any workaround, e.g. batch-editing the address book on my computer or similar? An obvious solution would be to traverse each address book entry on my computer and add a number containing the prefix. Could be done manually I suppose, but, hey, this is the computer age. We even have supercomputers now, Apple.

"even if Apple offer this version (easy for non-tech people to use)
and an iOS version (for the geeks) who have iPhones, iPads and want
to play Angry Birds on their TV - or better still, both, have an iOS
button on the Remote so you can change to iOS when you want Apps?"
Who says they didn't do this? I see no difference in using AirPlay for movies than I do for a game or mobile safari. Also, the new TV has Bluetooth - wonder why....

Outlook 2010 - Automatic signatures for auto-mapped shared mailbox..

Hi,
I have recently received below 02 requests for a shared mailbox:
Automatic signature or standard bottom lines for shared mailbox, user have full mailbox and send as permission?
Automatic response and auto delete of all incoming mails for shared mailbox?
Is there a way to achieve this, Please help!

Hi,
If you want to set separately default signatures for each mailbox, primary mailbox and shared mailbox, I'm afraid there is no way to achive this goal from Exchange side, you may need some third party software.
Here is a similar thread for your reference.
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/5c62c553-7533-4547-b49d-dcbffeb447e1/outlook-2010-automatic-signatures-for-automapped-shared-accounts?forum=outlook
To create automatic reply, you can use the Set-MailboxAutoReplyConfiguration command. And if you want to delete all messages for incoming to this share mailbox, you can run the New-InboxRule command to create an inbox rule for this shared mailbox to delete
incoming messages.
More information about these commands:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638217(v=exchg.141).aspx
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335170(v=exchg.141).aspx
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Auto-mapping (prefix/suffix)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for