Automatic Sub-Criteria: PRICE HISTORY in Vendor Evaluation

Hello All,
Can anybody help me in understanding what actually the following mean in Automatic Vendor Evaluation!!
1) Effective Price
2) Calculated Effective Price
3) Actual Effective Price
4) Calculated Effective Price for a particular Vendor
I see all this in the following link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cf8414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Under "How the System computes Scores:"
Under "Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria:Overview"
Under "Price History (Main Criterion "Price")"
Thanks

Hi ZEYNEP,
1) Effective price - End price after taking all conditions (for example, cash discounts, delivery costs etc.)  into account.
2) Total Price - Price arrived at after taking all discounts and surcharges into account
3) Total value = total quantity x price
When a price changes, the value of the stock changes, since the value is calculated from the price:
4) Effective (actual) price: Net price minus cash discount and plus miscellaneous provisions and delivery costs as well as non-deductible input tax
In simple - Total Cost - Expenditure on material till Goods Receipt (Procurement) and Effective cost - including all expenses till delivery from factory or some times till reach the consumer (vary depend upon the nature of business).
Here is an example
Material Price is $ 1000/-
& Discount is 10% and tax is 10% and freight is $ 50/-,Fixed( it may also %)
So Here the Material Price is called Gross Price $ 1000/-
Gross Price ($ 1000/-)- Discount {$ 100/-(10% of $ 1000/-)}= Net Price $ 900/-
Here Net Price $ 900/-
Tax $ 90/- ($ 900/- +$ 90 = $ 990/- is called sub-total)
Freight $ 50/-
$ 1040/-
The Total Price ($ 1040/-) is called Effective Price.
Hope this is helpful. Reward if useful.
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

    Dear all,
    I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
    For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
    Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
    Vendor XYZ
    Material ABC
    For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
    For 2010 Maket price 8.2  Effective price 8.5
    Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
    Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
    Vendor XYZ
    Material DEF
    For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
    For 2010 Maket price 20  Effective price 22
    Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
    When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
    5     Price behavior     5.0     10
    5     Price behavior     10.0     15
    5     Price behavior     20.0     20
    5     Price behavior     50.0     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0     10
    5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
    5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
    5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
    Pls help me resolve the issue
    Regards.
    Milind Dugade

    Hi Siva,
    [Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Reward if helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Naveen Dasari
    Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

  • Price level in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    I have created 1st PO with price 50 and checked the ME63, system showed score for price level as 40. Then I made another PO with price 55 and checked ME63, system displayed the same score 40,
    While there is change in price of 10 %, so I was expecting score of 10 .
    Can anyone explain about this.

    Hi,
    Following is the calculation procedure for
    1) Price Level -
    If you have maintained market price for the material, the system checks vendor's price level with the market price, otherwise it compares the vendor's price with average price of material by all vendors. Then the price variance is calculated in percentage. The score is awarded for this price variance as per settings in your system configuration. This process is repeated for all the materials supplied by the vendor. The overall score is the average of all these scores.
    2) Price Behaviour -
    System checks market price / average price of the material for last year as well as for current year. System calculates the percentage change for the market price. System repeats this procedure for price of material by vendor. Then system compares these two values & calculates percentage variance. The score is awarded for this variance as per system configuration. The overall score is the average of all these scores of the materials.
    3)Online Delivry statistics -
    System calculates the difference between scheduled delivery date in PO & actual delivery date & calculates the percentage variance. The score is awarded as per settings in system configuration. This process is repeated for each P.O. & overall score is average of all these values.
    Hope the answer is helpfull. For more details, you can avail online help at site http//:help.sap.com on subject Vendor Evaluation.
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

  • Vendor evaluation - Price level

    Hi,
    pls can anybody help me to explain procedure how system calculating the sub criteria PRICE LEVEL, PRICE HISTORY , ONTIME DELIVERY,QTY RELIABILITY (Under main criteria PRICE,DELIVERY) in vendor evaluation process.
    Possible give sample calculation.
    Aparji

    Price Level
    This subcriterion compares relationship of a vendor's price to the market price. If the vendor's price is lower than the market price, he/she receives a good score; if it is higher than the market price he/she is assigned a poor score.
    On the basis of the subcriterion "Price Level" you can compare a vendor's price to the current market price at a certain point in time.
    Price History
    This subcriterion compares the development of the vendor's price with the market price.
    On the basis of the subcriterion "Price History", you can determine whether the vendor's price has increased or decreased over a certain period in comparison with changes in the market price over the same period.
    Goods Receipt
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality of the material that the vendor delivers. Quality inspection takes place at the time of goods receipt.
    Quality Audit
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality assurance system used by a company in manufacturing products.
    Complaints/Rejection Level
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
    The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.
    On-Time Delivery Performance
    This subcriterion is used to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
    Quantity Reliability
    This subcriterion is used to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
    "On-Time Delivery Performance" and "Quantity Reliability" always have to be seen in conjunction. You can specify for each material (in the material master record) or for all materials (in the system settings) the minimum quantity of the ordered materials that must be delivered in order for a goods receipt to be included in the evaluation. This enables you to avoid a situation in which a punctual goods receipt involving only a small quantity of ordered materials is included in the evaluation with a good score for "On-Time Delivery Performance". If this minimum quantity is not delivered, the vendor is not awarded a score. However, in this case the vendor

  • Vendor Evaluation in ML81N

    Dear Gurus
    I need to maintain some additional sub criteria for External Services, since sap standard has only 2 Sub criteria, in ML81N the vendor evaluation TAB Appears over there.
    My problem is, I can add the additional sub criteria as business requirement, but in ML81N its not appearing for Manual Input, only SAP Standard 2 Sub criteria appears over there, not other additional sub criteria.
    How to make appear the additonal sub criteria in ML81n transcation>>Vendor evaluation tab???
    Please advise me on this. Your help is most appreciated
    Thanks
    RS
    Edited by: RS on Apr 27, 2009 3:18 PM

    Hello,
    Please maintain vendor evaluation for related purchasing organization. Afterwards, vendor evaluation tab will be appeared in ML81N.
    Thanks.
    Regards,

  • Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

    Dear Team,
    Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
    Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nireesh

    Hi,
    Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
    Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
    Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
    Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
    So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
    Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
    In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

  • Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

    Hi
    How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
    Regards
    Umapathy

    hi,
    Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
    Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
    > vendor evaluation
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
    Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
    weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
    Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
    Price 1 5
    Quality 1 5
    Delivery 1 2
    Gen. service/support 1 1
    Ext. service provision 1 2
    Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
    In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
    specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
    automatically.
    You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
    form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
    Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
    Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
    An example :-
    How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
    "On-Time Delivery Performance"?
    The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
    (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
    You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
    will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
    delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
    September 15.
    In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
    the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
    effect on the score for this goods receipt.
    However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
    which the vendor will actually adhere to.
    The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
    into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
    are the movement types 101 and 105.
    Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
    but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
    in Customizing.
    Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
    time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
    not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
    that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
    bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
    for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
    conjunction with quantity reliability.
    Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
    If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
    high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
    low percentage variance:
    The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
    the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
    The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
    12 / 20 x 100 = 60
    If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
    (12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
    If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
    the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
    statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
    Regards,
    Manish

  • Vendor Evaluation-market price

    Hi Experts,
    How to maintain market price in the system for vendor evaluation based on sub-criteria Price level??? What is the best and easiest practice. Please share your experience.
    Your replies will be appriciated with points.
    Regards,
    santosh

    Hello,
    The market price is entered in the transaction MEKH.
    About the Price level:
    This score is computed with the information between inforecords and Market Price.
    This compare is making for each material that a vendor has provided.
    This information is not contained in table S013 and is only calculated during an evaluation and saved in the table ELBP.
    Inforecords are per vendor X material – tables EINA and EINE, field NETPR.
    Market Prices are per Material X Material Group.
    I hope this information help.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

    Dear Gurus,
    Pls explain me Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the external vendors. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest points scored by vendor is selected for procurement.
    Follow the bellow steps:
    1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
    Select…………….Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
    2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
    Price,
    Quality,
    Delivery,
    Service
    For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
    Criteria Sub-Criteria
    Price, 1.Market Price,2. Price List
    Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
    Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation, 3.Shipment Intructions
    Service 1. Innovative, 2. Flexibility
    3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
    4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
    5. ME61
    With above, you need to explore urself and read SAP help files.
    Note: Follow the below link and check saphelp file
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Regards,

  • Vendor Evaluation Process

    Hi all,
        I want to know the vendor Evalution process in SAP. Plesae povide any documentation for it.
    Regards,
    Kapil.

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the vendors of the external vendor. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest scored vendor is selected for procurement.
    Follow the bellow steps:
    1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
    Select…………….Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
    2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
    Price,
    Quality,
    Delivery,
    Service
    For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
    Criteria Sub-Criteria
    Price, 1.Market Price,2.Price Lsit
    Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
    Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation,Shipment Intructions
    Service 1.Inovative, 2. Flexibility
    3.SPROMM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation-->Define Scope List.
    4. SPROMM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation--> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
    5. ME61
    For more check the links:
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Vendor evaluation - Confirmation Date

    Dear all,
    am trying to run vendor evaluation for - confirmation date..
    i have create a new confirmation  spro - MM -purchasing - confirmations - define external conf , setup conf  control
    i have included this confirmation in the PO ..delivery date in po item line is 23.06.2014.. delivery date in conf in item details 22.06.2014  GR date is 23.06
    when i run vend evaluation, 4 Adher. to Conf. Date is coming zero ---
    can you pls advise what could be the reason...  is my understanding to this Subcriterion is correct

    Hi,
    As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
    Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
    Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
    an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
    here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

  • Vendor Evaluation Delivery Subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date

    Hi experts,
    I have Vendor Evaluation configured for Delivery subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date.  These are set to scoring method 6 and B respectively.  In the Purchasing Org Data, for subcriteria Delivery, I have equal weighting set for all 4 subcriteria (on-time del, quantity reliability, shipping instr, and adher to conf date).  When I run the vendor evaluation in ME61, and look at the evaluation of subcriteria, I see a score and weight for on-time delivery, and quantity reliablity.  But for shipping instructions and adher to Conf Date, there is no score and the weight is 0.0.  Does anyone know why there is no weight shown?  I know I have to maintain the scores for shipping instr and adher to conf date but I should see weight as 25% since I set these 4 subcriteria to equal weighting.  Can anyone help?  Thanks!
    Regards,
    Julie

    Hi,
    As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
    Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
    Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
    an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
    here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

  • Vendor Evaluation tab not coming in Service Entry sheet.

    Please guide me to get the vendor eval tab in Service entry sheet creation and also provide the what are the transaction code to be used.
    How to run the back ground job.
    In Vendor evaluation each and every vendor need to be maintained the scores?
    Regards,
    Hanuman.

    Hi,
    T.code: ML81N below mentioned tabs are coming.
    1. Basic Data
    2. Accept data
    3. Value
    4. Long txt.
    5. History.
    Vendor Evaluation tab not coming
    Regards,
    Hanuman

  • Vendor Evaluation - Price history

    Hi
    In vendor evaluation the score for the subcriteria Price History is not getting calculated.
    The scoring method that I have used is : Automatic Determ. from Purch. Statistics: Price Behavior
    What can be the reason? How it is calculated?
    Regards

    to determine how a vendor's price for a material has changed over the last few years, the material's price history is compared with the market price history.
    The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained the current market price and last year's market price for the material.
    If not, the system uses the price for the material group to which the material belongs.
    If this price is not maintained either, the system uses the effective prices from the previous year and the current year. Prices from standard purchase orders for materials and prices from subcontract orders are dealt with separately.
    The system then calculates the percentage variance between the old and new market prices.
    The vendor's effective price is re-calculated with this percentage variance. The result represents the effective price the vendor should be asking if his price had changed over time in the same way as the market price.
    This calculated effective price is then compared with the actual effective price, and a percentage variance is determined.
    The system then awards the vendor the score you have maintained in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    The system repeats this process for all the materials you procure from the vendor. Each time you start an evaluation, the system calculates the average score for all the materials. The result is the vendor's score for the subcriterion "Price History".

  • Automatic criteria in Vendor evaluation

    Can anybody tell me what is difference between automatic criteria and semi automatic creteria in vendor evaluation? can anyone explain me automatic criteria with some example?
    Thanks and regards
    sriram

    hi sriram
    vendor evaluation can be done
    main criteria score from sub criteria
         sub criteria
               each sub criteria scores will be cal based
                    1.maual
                    2.semi auto
                    3.automatic
    if auto means u need to define points score for each sub criteria.once u define criteria for scoring based on that system automatically allot score for each sub criteria
    if semi auto means u need to enter score manually at inforecord level for each  subcriteria for each operation u do in purchasing.Here u r not defigning criteria for alloting score to sub criteria u need to enter manually for each operation.
    ok
    can u understand that
    if ok assign points me
    nani

Maybe you are looking for

  • Server manager, not logged on

    what am i missing here?? SVRMGR> connect internal Connected. SVRMGR> startup nomount pfile= $ORACLE_HOME/dbs/init_oldbs.ora SVRMGR> CREATE DATABASE "oldbs" maxdatafiles 254 maxinstances 8 maxlogfiles 32 character set US7ASCII national character set U

  • Can't remember screen lock password

    can't remember screen lock password!

  • Button movie clip

    hello, i am building a full flash site, and i have created animated buttons seperatley,outwith the main fla, and i have imported them into the main timeline. The button file is a movie clip,and works beautifully when testing from its own fla,but it d

  • Cant find system restore

    i lost the restore disk to my mac os 9.2.2 and on all the support things i cant find it?? please some one send me a link to download it please.

  • TECO is not allowed without closing the inspection lot

    Hello I have implemented 03 & o4 inspection. When I made TECO of Process Order system is allowed without making UD of inspection lot. I required if the inspection lots are open of particular process order system should not allow for TECO. Please sugg