AUTOMATIC VENDOR EVALUATION

Dear SDN Experts & MM Gurus,
I had run automatic vendor evaluation in back groung . I need your experities in the following queries .
1. system is giving messsage weighing Key doesnot exists for the purchase organization & in overall score in Me62 or Me63 transaction showing Zero for all vendors .what is the difference between Me63 & me62 display.
2. After running the report for all vendors i want to view the comparision list or Rank for all vendors .
3. i would like to view the report by vendor code main crtieria scores & overall score ,but system is not showing report in this format ,is there any report where i can get the automatic vendor evaluated list in this form.
Thanks in Advance .
regards,
Injeti.

please advice /comment on the above query .
regds,
injeti

Similar Messages

Procedures of semi-automatic vendor evaluation

Dear Experts ,
Kindly help on the exact procedures of semi-automatic vendor evaluation which includes configuration steps and other steps .
Best Regards

Hi
check this link,it may helful to you
[http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Automatic Vendor Evaluation - Partner Roles

Hi SAP Gurus,
Please try to help me with the following scenario.
My client has different Goods Suppliers (GS1, GS2 and GS3) for a particular vendor (VN). They have been attached as three different partner roles for the vendor (VN).
They do evaluation for QUALITY - Subcriteria GR Inspection for each of the manufacturing locations (GS1, GS2 and GS3) through Automatic Vendor Evaluation for Quality - at GR Inspection.
The question is, when an Automatic Evaluation for Quality is done at the main vendor (VN) level, will those scores which have already been evaluated at the three Goods Supplier locations (GS1, GS2 and GS3), will be considered for the Automatic Vendor Evaluation for Quality - at GR Inspection at the main Vendor (VN) level?
Thanks in advance

It is consider only main vendor not GS level

Automatic Vendor Evaluation - Compliance with Shipping Instructions

Hi Gurus,
Can anybody help me for "Compliance with Shipping Instructions".
I have maintained the shipping instructions but i need to know where the receiving person needs to enter score for Vendor's compliance for shipping instructions before posting the GR inorder to do Vendor Evaluation.
Thanks

hi
u find out what is main criteria
if Sub criteria is Compliance with shipping instr
u need to find out which scoring method ur foloowing
if it is automatic u need to maintain points score for sub criteria then system automatically will do.
for that u need maintain Compliance with shipping at the time of GR
in WHERE tab page in item .
ok
nani

Automatic Sub-Criteria: PRICE HISTORY in Vendor Evaluation

Hello All,
Can anybody help me in understanding what actually the following mean in Automatic Vendor Evaluation!!
1) Effective Price
2) Calculated Effective Price
3) Actual Effective Price
4) Calculated Effective Price for a particular Vendor
I see all this in the following link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cf8414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Under "How the System computes Scores:"
Under "Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria:Overview"
Under "Price History (Main Criterion "Price")"
Thanks

Hi ZEYNEP,
1) Effective price - End price after taking all conditions (for example, cash discounts, delivery costs etc.) into account.
2) Total Price - Price arrived at after taking all discounts and surcharges into account
3) Total value = total quantity x price
When a price changes, the value of the stock changes, since the value is calculated from the price:
4) Effective (actual) price: Net price minus cash discount and plus miscellaneous provisions and delivery costs as well as non-deductible input tax
In simple - Total Cost - Expenditure on material till Goods Receipt (Procurement) and Effective cost - including all expenses till delivery from factory or some times till reach the consumer (vary depend upon the nature of business).
Here is an example
Material Price is $ 1000/-
& Discount is 10% and tax is 10% and freight is $ 50/-,Fixed( it may also %)
So Here the Material Price is called Gross Price $ 1000/-
Gross Price ($ 1000/-)- Discount {$ 100/-(10% of $ 1000/-)}= Net Price $ 900/-
Here Net Price $ 900/-
Tax $ 90/- ($ 900/- +$ 90 = $ 990/- is called sub-total)
Freight $ 50/-
$ 1040/-
The Total Price ($ 1040/-) is called Effective Price.
Hope this is helpful. Reward if useful.
Thanks

Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

Hi Gurus,
I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
Pls advice on this.
Regards,
Venu

Hi
There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards
Raja

QM Settings for Vendor Evaluation

Hi All,
I am having a small issue with QM settings in Vendor Evaluation.
Actual Scenario - My client makes use of "Weighted Charateristics" instead of "Usage Decisions" and decides whether the material can be used or rejected etc at the time of Quality Inspection.
And, i believe that whatever the score or decision regarding the material was observed, it will be stored in a file with scores.
Now, the problem is Automatic Vendor Evaluation is simply giving a single score of 82 for whatever decision they make. Please try to address my following queries
1) Where the person responsible in QM needs to maintain the actual file with scores so that Vendor Evaluation can pick those scores for calculation?
2) Is there any configuration involved in either QM or Vendor Evaluation?
I came to know that all the configuration on the Vendor Evaluation side is OK
Thanks

In the MM side for QM criteria you have to make automatic only than rest will take by the QM module
see below
Complaints/Rejection Level
This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.

System setting for vendor evaluation incomplete

HI....
I want to caryout automatic vendor evaluation when i run t code ME63, its show an error system setting for purchase org incomplete where as i have maintained all the parameters from standarfd 0001, can anyone tell me how to carry out ven evaluation.
Regards
SARFRAZ

Hi,
Select SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Vendor Evaluation. Select following criteria -
1) Define Weighing keys - Here define weighing keys in addition to 01- Equal Weighing & 02- Unequal Weighing (if required)
2) Define Criteria - Here 5 standard criteria are maintained. Maintain additional criteria if required. Also maintain sub-criteria. Each main criteria contains some standard subcriteria. If required you may maintain additional subcriteria upto 20 per main criteria.
3) Define Scope List - Here you may maintain how the evaluated vendors should be ranked.
4) Define Purchase Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation - Here you may maintain main criteria & sub-criteria for your purchasing organisation. Also maintain score for equal & unequal weighing. Maintain point score for automatic criteria for each percentage vainance
Hope this fulfils your query
Regards

Automatic criteria in Vendor evaluation

Can anybody tell me what is difference between automatic criteria and semi automatic creteria in vendor evaluation? can anyone explain me automatic criteria with some example?
Thanks and regards
sriram

hi sriram
vendor evaluation can be done
main criteria score from sub criteria
     sub criteria
           each sub criteria scores will be cal based
                1.maual
                2.semi auto
                3.automatic
if auto means u need to define points score for each sub criteria.once u define criteria for scoring based on that system automatically allot score for each sub criteria
if semi auto means u need to enter score manually at inforecord level for each subcriteria for each operation u do in purchasing.Here u r not defigning criteria for alloting score to sub criteria u need to enter manually for each operation.
ok
can u understand that
if ok assign points me
nani

Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
Pratap

Hello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards,

Vendor Evaluation semi-automatic TABLE ELBM

Hi,
i am BW consulting,
i want use the 0PUR_C06 cube but this use the extractor 0MM_PUR_VE_02 in R3, this extractor read information the ELBM table.
When run de vendor evaluation, fill de ELBP (customer level)table but not ELBM (material level) table.
someone knows how to fill the table?
or the procedure for vendor evaluation semi-automatic at the level of material?
Thanks!

Hi,
The table ELBM is filled in the info record. If you go to transaction ME12 and then to Extras/Vendor Evaluation, there you have a field Market behavior. This is the way this table is filled.
I hope this helps!.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Vendor Evaluation Automatically

Dear all
        Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi

Automatic Evaluation Data (Vendor Evaluation)

Hi Experts,
We have defined vendor evaluation in such a way. Price, Quality & Delivery - Automatic Evaluation and Service - Manually Entered. When we do Automatic evaluation thru T-Code ME61, Score of price, quality and delivery appears in the system. How can we see the backend data from which these scores derives. So that we can explain user, that the scores have come due to following data / calculation done by system in background.
Can anybody help me. Full points to helping answers.
Regards
GR

Hi GR,
In Help documentation you have the details how each score is getting calculated. We can use this documentation to explain to the client. Also you can take the help of OSS notes.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Regarding to know how the system arrived at that score, is very difficult as it calculates the score by taking all the trasactions happend for that period. And no where in the system it shows how it calculated per transaction-wise.
But if you are so determined, note down the previous score for the vendor, then do one transaction ( PO and GR). Manually Claculate the for one perticular criteria score as defined in the Help documentation. Then run the evaluation and cross check your manually calculated score to the new score.
Hope this helps you in answering your query,
With Regards,
Krishna

Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

Hi
How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
Regards
Umapathy

hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
> vendor evaluation
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
Regards,
Manish

AUTOMATIC VENDOR EVALUATION

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for