Base amount-basb in taxinj

Hi,
if a PO condition is made with cond category "Insurance" and we do not want to activate it accrual since it will be part of inevntory cost and payable to vendor,then how to achieve the following;
PO:
Basic 100
Vat 10%
Insurance 20
At the time of GR
Inv Dr. 120
Gr/Ir Cr. 120
At the time of IR
Vendor Cr. 130
Gr/ir Dr. 120
Vat GL Dr. 10
but what is happening since BASB is getting a value of 120 so
At IR
Vendor Cr.132
Gr/Ir. Dr. 120
Vat GL Dr. 12
We do not want the same i.e. insurance value should not be added to BASB but insurance will be added to inventory and should be payable to vendor.
Rgds

The base amount basb at taxinj-tax procedure get value from PO pricing proc (m/08) .
there are certain rules that which condition value of PO will add up and flow to taxinj.
so my issue is there, the solution is not lying in the alignment of m/08.......hope it is clear now
rgds
Edited by: SAP-MM on Jul 8, 2010 3:27 PM

Similar Messages

Condition type to be loaded on Material cost after Taxes but shouldn't change Tax base Amount.

Customer requirement is that they want to deduct some amount after the Taxes (after BASB) &t load this amount value after taxes on Material cost (hence accrual KEY can't be used). but with the addition of this new condition type (for deduction) it shouldn't change the base amount for Tax condition type (BASB).
Basic Problem : new condition type value to be load on material (after taxes). but this condition value shouldn't change the Net price of PO(amount in BASB condition of Tax) so that base amount (BASB) of Tax procedure remain unchanged.
(Since it is to be loaded on material hence i cant use account key definitely. Also this cost to be loaded on material after taxes)
Ex -             PBXX =     100 base price
                 Freight =       20
   Tax base amnt =     120
               Tax (5%)=          6
                      Total =    126
     Other Charges=      10 (this 10 Rs amount in this condition type required to be loaded on material cost, at the same time this condition value shouldn't change the base amount for the Tax (BASB)
Please suggest (purpose is to load the deduction on material cost after Taxes & same time it shouldn't change the the amount after Tax base calculation)

Hi,
   Your condition type is without acrual flag in M/06. No acrual key is maintained in the MM pricing procedure.
   To achieve your requirement, maintain subtotal 6 against the condition type in your MM pricing procedure in M/08.
   Maintain the base type calc procedure as 362 against your BASB condition type in tax procedure. Keep the field blank for the tax condition type (VAT or CST / ED etc)
   Test the scenario again with a new PO. System will show the condition value in net amount field in PO, but the same wont be copied to BASB in tax procedure. Check the taxes pop up. Check the same and revert back.
Note: Similar requirement (not exact) for acrual conditions are mentioned in my doc: Tax Calculation on Freight - Different Scenarios You may refer it if required.
Regards,
AKPT

CST/VAT on Base amount+ CVD

Hi,
We have one requirement of buying material from local EOU unit in Indian scenario. In this we have to take care of CVD & education Ecess on CVD, which we have configured in local pricing procedure. It is working fine. But now, one more requirement is to calculate CST /VAT (which can be deductible or non-deductible) on total amount. This CST condition we have maintained in TAXINN pricing procedure. But in BASE AMOUNT (BASB), system is not adding CVD & ECESS on CVD in net amount. So CST is being calculated on NET amount & not on Total of NET , CVD & ECESS. How can we do this?
Thanks
mmsaperp

okie

How to include a condition value in Tax Base Value BASB

Hi friends,
I have created a separate pricing procedure as per the price of a vendor which charges as follows.
A. Gross price Rs.100
B. Discount
C. Sub Total: A-B
D. Depo Charges % on C
E. Sub Total(C+D)
F. Entry Tax % on E
F. Sub Total (E+F)
G.NAVS on F
H. Sub Total (F+G)
For Depo Charges & Entry Tax I created new conditions ZDC1 & ZENT
Both the conditions are defined as
Condition Class A (Discount/Surcharge)
Calculation type A (Percentage)
Both are marked as item conditions without accrual tick.
Than I put them in a new calculation schema as follows .But the problem is NAVS, which is getting calculated on Sub Total u201CEu201D, i.e., without taking the Entry Tax value in to Sales Tax Base Value (BASB).
This is to indicate that our Tax procedure is TAXINJ and it is without any excise conditions.
The structure of the calculation schema is like this.
Step     Cntr     CTyp     Description     From     To
001     01     PB00     Gross Price     000     000
001     02     PBXX     Gross Price     000     000
010     01     RA00     Discount % on Net     000     000
010     02     RA01     Discount % on Gross     001     000
020     00          NetValueincldiscount     000     000
030     01     ZDC1     Depo Charges (%)     020     000
035     00          Sub Total          020           030
040     01     ZENT     Entry Tax %      035     000
060     00          Sub Total                     035     040
070     00     NAVS     Non-Deductible Tax     000     000
071     00          Sub Total                     060     070
Than other conditiontypes..........
What else am I missing for getting the right calculation?
Dhruba

Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba

Tax procedure for VAT calculation on Base amount + WHT amount

Hi All,
Needed your inputs on definition of tax procedure, to calculate VAT tax where base amount + withholding tax amount are tax base components.
E.g. in AR line item:
     Revenue: 950 (FB70 ->Editing options: calculate taxes on net amount check box is enabled)
     WHT: 50 (5%) (Re-grossing method using)
     VAT: 70 (7%)
To achieve as above how to define tax procedure: current procedure definition as below.
StepCounter-Ctyp----Description-From--To
100--0---     -BASB--Base Amount
117--0---     -J1W1Output Tax----100
118--0MWS1-Subtotal--100----117
120--0---     -MWASOutput Tax------118
Please through some light on this.
Thanks in advance.
SK

Dear all,
Any comments please.
Highly appreciated calculating VAT tax on base amount and WHT (re-grossing up).
Thanks in advance.
SK

Base amount condition type

please tell me how does system picks the value of base amount for the condition type BASB in tax calculation procedure.
as per my understadning system should pick this value automatically and should calulate differnt taxes on that
as atthe tim eof miro i am making use of some tax code but system is not picking the base amount for the tax code

hi,
these steps are following
1. define condition type t.code OBYZ
2. Define accounting keys        OBCN
3. define calculation procedure OBYZ
4. Assign tax procedure to country OBBG
5. Define tax codes                    FTXP
6. define tax accounts                OB40
tax calculation mention customer/vendor , PO, MIGO, MIRO,
sales order, billing documents,
before posting Assign to tax procedure to country.
calculation procedure example
under control data
steps     counter            condition type     from   to     A.keys
10            0                      BASB             -           -       -
100          0                       vs01               10                vs1
110          0                       vs02               100     110     vs2
same level
base acondition 10

Excise base amount for Import PO in MIGO

Dear All,
I have create the Import Po and maintain all conditions i.e.JCDB,JCV1,JECV,J1CV,JEDB,JSDB,JADC and assign the custom vendor to conditions and make the custom payment through MIRO for planned delivery cost.
Then while doing the MIGO with referance to PO and commercial invoice,all duties are captyring correctly but excise base amount is showing base amount plus basic custom duty.Please give the solution is any setting missing in costomizing.
And in MIGO item screen BED %(CVD%) is not showing but AED,ECSS,SECESS is showing correctly.
Please give solution urgently.
Regards,
Vinay

hi
check following configuration
path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
if it is been done then check whole config as follows
TOTAL IMPORT CONFIGURATION AND CYCLE
in ur pricing u have to create following
JCDB IN: Basic Custom Duty
JCV1 IN : CVD
JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC Additional Duty of Custom
JCV1, JECV, J1CV and JADC will go to Excise MODVAT Accounts and JCDB, JEDB and JSDB will get loaded on inventory.
In M/06, for all above conditions, keep following controls;
Cond. class A (Discount or surcharge) Plus/minus A (Positive)
Calculat.type A (Percentage)
Cond.category B (Delivery costs)
Activate "Currency Conversion" and "Accrual"
Now for setoff
maintain the following conditions in excise default settings.
JCV1, JECV, JADC
path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
along with ur tax procedure maintain these conditions in the specified fields
JCV1 in CVD condition field.
JECV in ECS condition field.
JADC in ACD condition field.
in case of SECess on CVD, no need to maintain.
it is hardcode in the standard
Vendor in GR 2 (Entry always possible)
Import scenario
1.Create material master of import goods.
2. Create vendor master record of import vendor and Customs clearing vendor.
3. Maintain CIN settings.
4. Maintain J1id.
5. Maintain Pricing procedure SAP standard JIMPOR.., maintain required conditions..JCDB, JCV1...
6.Assign the schema to respective import vendor in purchasing view of VMR.
7. Create import PO, check in conditions of JCDB, JCV1 the customs clearing vendor(Indian vendor) and percentage is assigned. This can be done by In condition tab select condtion then click on display, then enter.
Save the PO.
8. MIRO --Capture Bill Of Entry.(Commercial Invoice No.,).Customs clearing first .Here CVD will b converted to BED.
9. Capture Excises invoice--j1iex.
10.MIGO.
12.Post Excise Invoice.
13.MIRO...Payment to vendor(import vendor)

Excise Base amount not updated in J_1iexcdtl table -reg

Dear Gurus,
We have used SAP Ecc 5.0 Patch level 21. In patch level 20, SAP admit without delivery , can do commercial billing and excise billing in foreground. After batch update SAP not support excise invoice creation in foreground. It support only background. We have 2 senario. 1 is capex sales . ie. without material stock we have raise the comm.billing and excise billing. 2 is supplimentary billing. both the senario now getting effected because of no delivery. Asper SAP advise we have setting for background process excise invoice creation. Excise invoice created. but excise base amount not updated in j_1iexcdtl table. Using J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE user exit we are trying to update the same. For single material it works fine. But more than one material for the first material's base amount is updated in all materials. for your reference i have mentioned the codding . SAP advise it is possible to update excise base amount. But not possible to do. pl.adivse if any correct or guide to solve it.
FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE.
""Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE KOMV-KAWRT
*"     VALUE(POSNR) TYPE VBRP-POSNR
*" EXPORTING
*"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE KOMV-KAWRT
*" TABLES
*"      KONV STRUCTURE KONV
*{   INSERT         RDSK925285                                        1
TABLES : KONV.
data :   W_INDEX LIKE SY-TABIX.
DATA :ITAB LIKE TABLE OF KONV WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA :ITAB1 LIKE TABLE OF KOmV WITH HEADER LINE.
ITAB1[] = KONV[].
DATA : BEGIN OF I_TAB OCCURS 0,
       KAWRT LIKE KONV-KAWRT,
       POSNR LIKE VBRP-POSNR,
       END OF I_TAB.
LOOP AT ITAB1.
READ TABLE ITAB1 WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JMOD' KPOSN = ITAB1-KPOSN.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
    EXCITM_BASE = ITAB1-KAWRT.
    POSNR = ITAB1-KPOSN.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
*}   INSERT
ENDFUNCTION.
Thanks & Regards
R.Udayakumar

solved with the same user exit

Excise Duty Base Amount J_1IEXCDTL

Hi All,
After Creation of Excise Invoice the Field " Excise Duty Base Amount " is not getting updated , can any one give some idea on this
Thanks In advance
Siva

Hi,
Kindly ensure that in your SD Pricing procedure the condition type which
has the Assesable value has been defined with Condition category 'H'
through the transaction V/06, it is also expected to be non statistical
in your pricing procedure. If it is statistical then refer the SAP
note 1003634 which has the user exit J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE. This
user exit has the KON strcuture of your billing, you can derevive the
base value and pass it to the parameter EXCITM_BASE so that the excise
base can be updated during billing. This has to implemented through
SE37 transaction.
Please note that the old documents can not be resolved with the above
solution, you will have to write your own ABAP code and update the base
price in the table J_1iexcdtl for the excise invoice created when you
transfer the goods from factory.
Regards,
Murali

Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE -1

Dear Friends,
While Iam creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice - Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE1
thanks
Sasi

Dear Lakshmipathi,
Earlier Liable to AT1 is ticked but not Indicator NCCD,I have checked after ticking the NCCD as well....
In my pricing procedure i dont have the NCCD condition .....as its not required.
In classify consditiontypes: I have maintained PR00 condition type as well along with Excise condition types...Do i need to maintain this PR00 anywhere else
or
Is there anything I need to do with the assesable value.......if so how should be the entry like in the pricing procedure?
Can someone please provide me the solution...its very urgent
Thanks
Sasi

Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?

Dear All,
I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
Where I am doing wrong?
please guide.
Using:
SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
Location : India.
Thanks.

Hi ,
maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
1846344 - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
Symptom
This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
Solution
Patch installation options:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
Patch content:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
Patch download:
Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
Header Data
Released On
02.05.2013 02:34:18
Release Status
Released for Customer
Component
SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade
Priority
Recommendations/additional info
Category
Upgrade information
References
This document refers to:
SAP Business One Notes
1482452
IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
1650289
Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
1678528
Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
1754529
Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
1756263
Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
1757641
Year-end closing
1757690
SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
1757898
Incoming Bank File Format
1757904
Outgoing Bank File Format
1762860
Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
1770690
Pro Forma Invoice
1776948
Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
1780460
OINM column description is not translated
1780486
UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
1788256
Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
1788372
ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
1788818
RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
1790404
Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
1791295
B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
1791416
Adding a new item to BoM is slow
1794111
Text is overlapping in specific localization
1795595
Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
1797292
Queries in alerts should support more query results
1800055
B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
1802580
Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
1803586
Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
1803751
Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
1804340
LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
1805554
G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
1806576
Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
1807611
Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
1807654
Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
1808694
BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
1809398
CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
1809758
Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
1810099
Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
1811270
Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
1811846
Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
1812344
Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
1812740
DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
1813029
US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
1813835
Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
1814207
Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
1814860
Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
1815535
RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
1815810
GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
1816191
BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
1816611
CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte

Base Amount of CST/VAT with Excise tax code

Hi Experts,
Please tell us the base amount on which CST will triggered in BED+CST combination of TAX CODE.
Regards
Amit Tyagi

Hai!
Wherever BED is coming then exsice should be for its's manufacturing price not for purcahse price.so, use Assessable value as base amount for this combinations.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K

Excise Duty Base Amount in J1IEX in case of Import Purchasing

While posting Excise Invoice in case of Import Purchasing, duty values are coming from CVD, ACD, CVD Ecess & CVD SEcess. But I am not able to understand from where "Excise Duty Base Amount" is coming in J1IEX.
Can anyone throw light on this?
Thanks in advance

This is known that CVD, ACD, CVD Ecess & CVD SEcess are coming from PO u2013 MIRO and Excise default (in SPRO).
But my question is from where u201CExcise Duty Base Amountu201D is coming as it is neither maintained in PO nor in MIRO.
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance

Change in excise base amount in J1IEX in case of import PO

Hi,
In case of import PO when we are making J1IEX ref. to MIRO number the excise base amount which is comin gin mIRO is different but all the Excise tax condition amount are coming properly.
in one case in miro.
CVD : 10% = 3950.70
Ecess          = 79.00
SECESS       = 39.50
Add. duty     = 1743.0
according to this excise base amount should be 39507.00 but when we are capturing invoice ref. to MIRO in J1IEX excise base amount is coming aroung 20138,
can u help on this issue.
regards,
zafar

HII
Might be , while doing delivery cost invoice verification, u have done some mistake in MIRO.
SO check the MIRO ,acconting document which has been generated during deliver cost verification.
Then do J1IEX with refer to MIRO.
Or Do it reference throu PO.
Thanks

Creation of Service Tax code 10.30% on the 25% of the Base Amount

Dear Team,
We want to create a service tax code of 10.3% on the 25% of the Base amount.
Base Amount - 100.00
25% of the base amount(100/25) = 25.00
service tax(10.30%) to be calculate on Rs. 25.00
25*10.30% = 2.57
Base amount --> 100.00
Service Tax -->      2.57
      Total:                     102.57
Can somebody let me how to create the service tax code for this.
Regards,
Siva.

Hi Randeep,
As they said it is service tax GTA.Right we are doing out of SAP, we want it to be done in SAP
The tax calculation will be like below
service tax of 10.3% has to caluclate on the 25% of the Base amount. Like
25% is taxable and 75% is livied.
Base Amount - 100.00
25% of the base amount(100/25) = 25.00
service tax(10.30%) to be calculate on Rs. 25.00
25*10.30% = 2.57
Base amount --> 100.00
Service Tax -->      2.57
        Total:           102.57
Regards,
Siva.

Base amount-basb in taxinj

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for