Benefit of 'ProcessControl' field in Shipment Type configuration

Dear Gurus,
what is the benefit of 'processcontrol' field in document content section under Shipment type config?
how to make use this field? pls kindly help.
thanks.
rudy.

hi ,
Seem this 'ProcessControl' field is not have restriction or control even when i use it for collective or individual process (either one or many mode of transport). how do i see this control restriction ? which scenario?
Regards,
Rudy.

Similar Messages

Configuring Kodo default implementation for field of Collection type

If I am not mistaken default implementation for field of Collection type in
Kodo is
LinkedList based proxy. It would be great if it were possible to configure
Kodo to use a proxy of my choosing
I did some tests and it seems to me that ArrayList is much more efficient
than Linked list (see below)
Is there any specific reason I am not aware of that makes LinkedList better
than array list
In my applications all collections a relatively small (or at least most of
my collections are definitely small)
and since I use Collection interface there is no inserts into middle of my
collections - only appends (which ArrayList handles very well)
So my question is can I make Kodo to use ArrayListProxy for fields of
Collection type
(except of course using ArrayList field instead of Collection which I do not
want to do)
below is some statistics on collection performance (populating and iterating
collections)
the same test against 3 collections implementations (JDK 1.4.1)
Not only ArrayList by far the fastest and memory friendly it also garbage
collected much sooner and better -
I show here max memory consumption and last to would not be garbage
collected till all memory is in use (old generation GC)
and ArrayList seems to be collected by young gen GC because it was collected
very quickly between test cycles why other only when all memory was used
So please make ArrayList your default collection implementation :-)
Small collection size (40)
time(ms) memory(kb)
ArrayList 5,218 62,154
LinkedList 14,125 240,066
HashSet 27,000 311,825
the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
append(object):
ArrayList 8937, 53591
LinkedList 15047, 240066
Larger collection size (200)
ArrayList 4860, 47709
LinkedList 18468, 290704
HashSet 34391, 422282
the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
append(object):
ArrayList 11844, 47709
LinkedList 25766, 290704

You should be able to accomplish this fairly easily by extending
SimpleProxyManager:
http://solarmetric.com/Software/Documentation/2.4.3/docs/javadoc/com/solarmetric/kodo/util/SimpleProxyManager.html
and overriding the appropriate methods (getCollectionCopy and
getCollectionProxy).
On Mon, 12 May 2003 12:26:21 -0400, Alex Roytman wrote:
If I am not mistaken default implementation for field of Collection type in
Kodo is
LinkedList based proxy. It would be great if it were possible to configure
Kodo to use a proxy of my choosing
I did some tests and it seems to me that ArrayList is much more efficient
than Linked list (see below)
Is there any specific reason I am not aware of that makes LinkedList better
than array list
In my applications all collections a relatively small (or at least most of
my collections are definitely small)
and since I use Collection interface there is no inserts into middle of my
collections - only appends (which ArrayList handles very well)
So my question is can I make Kodo to use ArrayListProxy for fields of
Collection type
(except of course using ArrayList field instead of Collection which I do not
want to do)
below is some statistics on collection performance (populating and iterating
collections)
the same test against 3 collections implementations (JDK 1.4.1)
Not only ArrayList by far the fastest and memory friendly it also garbage
collected much sooner and better -
I show here max memory consumption and last to would not be garbage
collected till all memory is in use (old generation GC)
and ArrayList seems to be collected by young gen GC because it was collected
very quickly between test cycles why other only when all memory was used
So please make ArrayList your default collection implementation :-)
Small collection size (40)
time(ms) memory(kb)
ArrayList 5,218 62,154
LinkedList 14,125 240,066
HashSet 27,000 311,825
the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
append(object):
ArrayList 8937, 53591
LinkedList 15047, 240066
Larger collection size (200)
ArrayList 4860, 47709
LinkedList 18468, 290704
HashSet 34391, 422282
the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
append(object):
ArrayList 11844, 47709
LinkedList 25766, 290704

Service level field in Shipment

Dear forum,
Does anyone know where to configure the service level field (VTTK-BFART) in the shipment?
I am creating a shipment with transaction VT01n, and want to select an own defined service level (VTTK-BFART) in the header of the shipment. So I need the IMG path to configure the service level, to be able to add own defined values.
I do not need the instructions in how it is possible to have a default service level suggested by shipment type. That I already know how to do.
Thanks,
Ola

Hi,
Nope, the service level (VTTK-BFART) is not maintainable via customization. You can understand this when you press F1 and 7th tab { key like} is disabled.
But, you can add new entries in development with developer access key going in BFART domain.
Hope this is helpful for you.
Hrishi

IPC:bute in the field catalogue while processing configuration or pricing i

Hi,
I get this error (Message Class: PRC_MESSAGES_EXT (Messages for Calling Public Pricing Modules), Message Type: E, Message Number 099, Message variables: Message variables 1-4: IPC:bute in the field catalogue while processing configuration or pricing in context spe.condmgnt.customizing.dba.imp.AttributeClassObjectManager.createAttributeClassAttributeClassObjectManager.java)
when we ran IPC userexits.
We've added a field ZZPSTYV in the communication structure and modified the method to define this field like follows:
     public String[] determineRelevantAttributesForRequirement(
          boolean headerAttributes,
          int reqNo) {                         String[] relevantAttributes = new String[0];
     //Header?
     if (headerAttributes) {          }
     //Item
     else {
     //KOMP fields
     switch (reqNo){
          case 900:                              relevantAttributes = new String[] {"ZZPSTYV" };                                   break;
    return relevantAttributes;
Running this code we get the above listed error. Same error if we define unnecessarily a standard field, such as SOLD_TO_PARTY in place of ZZPSTYV.
Can anyone give us some advise as what we did wrong? Appreciate it very much,
Yanhui

Hi Yanhui,
Is it a item field? Remember that mixed fields should be declared at the header in the IPC.
Missing any other requirements?
Cheers
Andrew

Field Partner Bank Type in Credit notes in AR

Dear all,
We sometimes need to pay by bank transfer credit notes to some of our customers.
I know that it is possible to maintain the field Partner Bank Type in the customer master data for different bank accounts and then select in the AR item which bank account we want to use in the payment run.
However, this field (BSEG-BVTYP) does not seem to be available when the line item in AR corresponds to a credit. Is there any configuration setting that can be amended in order to achieve this?
Many thanks.

per SAP standard, the posting key's have some fields suppressed. Please check the credit posting key you are using (for e.g. 11) ,T.code OB41. Look into the payment transaction section & make the bank partner field Opt.Entry.
Hope this helps you.

Document Type Configuration question

Hi,
What does Condition type Line Items (Condition type for copying costs from line items) mean in a sales document type configuration.I am not clear even after reading the F1 help on this field.
I know that it has something to do with the pricing condition types EK01 and EK02 but still am not able to relate it completely with business point of view.
I know the differences between EK01 and EK02 and am also aware of the concept but I want to know the usage of giving picing Condition type at document type level.
It can come directly from the Pricing procedure then why do we give here?

Laxmi or Bala or Venkat..Anybody can reply if they have some suggestions?

Mapping Dock Version field in Shipment Create

Hi Guru's
i am facing problem in mapping dock version field in shipment create. Details are as fallows..............
Dock Version reference number is mapping to VTTK-TPBEZ(Shipment Description) from TIBCO. And the reqiure ment is there was a field VTTK-ZZVERSION (z field). I need to map VTTK-ZZVERSION field to (Basic type TPSSHT01)
Segment E1TPSHH-DESCRP which is typically linked to TPBEZ.
i have to make changes in the ZFM(Shipment Idoc Create). After executing the function module shipment will be created.
And when i run the Transacion VT03N in TAB IDENTIFICATION the "Shipment Description" field should be blank.
Thanks in advance..........

Hello.
I have no solution to your problem, but I have noticed something which I very much need. I want to be able to extract entries from JAR file which I specified in JNLP application descriptor. The word is about COM libraries which I want to copy and register on every client. But I have no chance to open JAR file which is specified in the JNLP app-desc.
In your code, you do this:
InputStream bla = clazz.getResourceAsStream();
which is not different from delegating the call directly to class' ClassLoader, which is the thing I do. I refer to the JAR file without path, like this:
InputStream huh = this.getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("some.jar");
Returns null pointer. As far as I know (I tested it before) Java Web Start does not put its cache paths in "java.class.path" and "java.library.path" system properties, so I cannot hope to know certain path from which I could download my JAR.
So, is there a way to access those JAR files, to copy them locally somewhere, to extract files from them, etc?
Dimitar

Interim Storage Type Configuration

Hi All
I want to find out on interim storage type configuration, if it is possible and flexible in that you are able to configure it in such a way that you are able to separate the movements into the storage types according to the diffrent commodities (material types) and within those commodities, you can separate/filter your gains, losses and adjustments. What I am looking at, at the end of the day is to be able to pull through a report of interim storage type where I would be able to see all my losses, gains and adjustments in terms of quantity sitting on the interim storage type.
Regards
Khuselwa

Hi
I am not sure what you want to see as stock in interim st types are not neccessarily gains or losses.
Interim st types are used in SAP to recognise that some stock exists and needs to be moved such as 902 for goods receipt or 921 for stock transfers.
If you have gains or losses which are created by adjustments you can use the 'Reason For Movement' field when you create the gain or loss (this field needs to be congigured) and then you can run a report MBGR to see them.
I hope that this helps

How to freeze shipment type for a region

Hi
My requirement is that my user want , shipment type to be road for a particular region. And i no case should any one should be able to change the shipment type.
Is there any standard solution for this ?

Hello,
There is no standard solution for your requirement.
One standard solution is to make the Field in Sales non-editable, but you want the Shipment Type to be proposed based on Region. Thus this will not be possible in Standard.
You will have go to Enhancement & apply User exit.
Please speak to your ABAP & he can insert a code to suit your requirement.
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Field Symbol - Assign type conflict.

Hi, i active successfully my program. This is the code:
DATA ls_g_oref_appl(21) TYPE C.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_appl> TYPE REF TO cl_ftr_mj_appl.
ls_g_oref_appl = '(SAPLTB4E)g_oref_appl'.
ASSIGN (ls_g_oref_appl) TO <fs_appl>.
But when i execute it, i get a dump with this message:
"ASSIGN_TYPE_CONFLICT : You attempted to assign a field to a typed field symbol,but the field does not have the required type. "
Also, i get sy-subrc = 0, so the field symbol <fs_appl> has a value assign.
Any suggestions? I tried by changing the type of the field to ANY, but it didnt compile.
Thanks for the help,
Karla

Hi Daniel, I verified again the type of g_oref_appl, and it is : cl_ftr_mj_appl. I check the top of the include and g_oref_appl is there :
' DATA g_oref_appl TYPE REF TO cl_ftr_mj_appl. '
Hi, Naren, also i tried with the TYPE ANY, but it doesnt compile.
I notice this:
CLASS cl_ftr_mj_appl DEFINITION ABSTRACT.
Is there a problem with field symbols and abstracts class???
Thanks for all your help,
Karla.
Edited by: Karla Tinoco on Mar 5, 2008 11:46 PM

Field Symbols Assign Type Conflict

Hi,
 I am working on a BAdi Implementation and have the following code.
method IF_EX_DPR_ATTRIBUTES~SET_DEFAULTS_UPON_CREATION .
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
 <ls_attributes> TYPE dpr_ts_project_ext.
ASSIGN cs_attributes TO <ls_attributes> .
CASE flt_val.
 WHEN cl_dpr_co=>sc_ot_project.
 <ls_attributes>-extended_attributes-ZZSOL_PRJ_ID = 'C0001'.
ENDCASE.
ENDMETHOD.
This is the sample implementation code provided by SAP. However, when I implement the above code, the system dumps at the statement
 ASSIGN cs_attributes TO <ls_attributes> .
and cs_attributes is of type any.
I tried the same code by adding "CASTING" at the end of above line. But, it still gives the dump. Below, is the dump message.
Note
The following error text was processed in the system BS3 : Error in ASSIGN in the program ZCL_IM_DPR_ATTRIBUTES=========CP .
The error occurred on the application server acequad_BS3_30 and in the work process 0 .
The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
The ABAP call stack was:
Form: IF_EX_DPR_ATTRIBUTES~SET_DEFAULTS_UPON_CREATION of program ZCL_IM_DPR_ATTRIBUTES=========CP
Form: IF_EX_DPR_ATTRIBUTES~SET_DEFAULTS_UPON_CREATION of program CL_EX_DPR_ATTRIBUTES==========CP
Form: ATTRIBUTES_DEFLTS_UPON_ACTION of program CL_DPR_BADI_SERVICES==========CP
Form: ATTRIBUTES_DEFAULTS_UPON_CREA of program CL_DPR_BADI_SERVICES==========CP
Form: SET_DEFAULTS_UPON_CREATION of program CL_DPR_PROJECT================CP
Form: SET_DEFAULTS_UPON_CREATION of program CL_DPR_PROJECT_O==============CP
Form: CONSTRUCTOR of program CL_DPR_PROJECT_O==============CP
Form: IF_DPR_APPL_OBJECT_FACTORY~CREATE_PROJECT of program CL_DPR_APPL_OBJECT_FACTORY====CP
Form: CREATE of program CL_DPR_BSP_APPLICATION========CP
Form: DO_HANDLE_EVENT of program CL_DPR_BSP_C_TOOLS============CP
Any ideas on how to use field symbols in the above context??
Thanks,
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh,
The reason it is dumping is because the actually type of the variable passed in CS_ATTRIBUTES is not fixed this is why they have specified it's type as type any.
The sample code in this regard is not correct, you should fist check the value of FLT_VAL to determine what type of variable CS_ATTRIBUTES actually is.
In the BADI documentation there is a list of values for field FLT_VALUE and the corresponding data type of CS_ATTRIBUTES for that value (According to the documentation the data type for FLT_VAL sc_ot_project is DPR_TS_PROJECT_INT).
method IF_EX_DPR_ATTRIBUTES~SET_DEFAULTS_UPON_CREATION .
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<ls_attributes> TYPE dpr_ts_project_int.
* ASSIGN cs_attributes TO <ls_attributes> .
CASE flt_val.
WHEN cl_dpr_co=>sc_ot_project.
ASSIGN cs_attributes TO <ls_attributes> .
<ls_attributes>-extended_attributes-ZZSOL_PRJ_ID
 = 'C0001'.
ENDCASE.
ENDMETHOD.
In this example you will ultimately end up with multiple field symbols for representing the CS_ATTRIBUTES parameter, one field symbol for each filter value you intend handling.
From
De Wildt

Is it possible to add text field in condition type in PO?

Dear Guru,
Please kindly advice. Is it possible to add text field in condition type?
I mean I have seen condition type "FRB1" Freight value in the condition detail we can input vendor code.
So I would like to know is it possible to add text field in condition detail and how to set it up.
Thank you very much.

We would like to maintain some text in condition because of we would like to get that text to PO print out and we don't want to do enhancement.
Ex: Condition Type: ZZZZ Insurance
PO Print out show
Item No. Desc Qty Unit Price Amount
10 Item description 10000 10 100000
20 Item description 10000 10 100000
30 Item description 10000 10 100000
 Insurance <<Description about insurance>> 9,999
Edited by: Saiyaman on Oct 1, 2009 1:35 PM
Edited by: Saiyaman on Oct 1, 2009 1:36 PM

Adding fields with data type "TIMS" to the BP transaction

hi all,
This is Anil regarding the addition of fields to the BP transaction.
here my problem is for BP transaction I could not find any BADI or screen exit to add the fields. Even EEWB tool does not allow us to cretate the fields with data type "TIMS". so could you please suggest any other way to add these fields to BP?
when I enter the values to the time fields in BP transaction, they must reflect in
BUT000 table also?
Regards,
Anil .

In the physical layer, Column Properties change the data type to int.
If still problem exists, In the Business Model, write a case statement like
case when column1=1 then 1 end
and apply count aggregation on the new calculated column,add the column to presentation table, use that new calculated column for report.
- Madan

Movement type configuration and account determination

Hi Experts,
Is movement type config SD responsibility?
Should it be MM?
How is movement type important for account determination?
Where to configure it? From SD point of view, can i say just configure in Material master?
regards
Tom
certified but jobless

Hi,
Is movement type config SD responsibility?
Should it be MM?
Movement types configuration is part of MM (most of time no need to configure new as standards are enough)
How is movement type important for account determination?
Movement type are not considered for account determination in SD
Account determination is carried out in VKOA
Where to configure it? From SD point of view, can i say just configure in Material master?
NA

Adobe Acrobat X Version 10.1.9 - looking to find out why my form fields, comments, or type that we a

Adobe Acrobat X Version 10.1.9 - looking to find out why my form fields, comments, or type that we add to our pdf's are not appearing when we send to our clients?

George, thank you for your help. I actually figured it out!! I need to flatten my documents before I can send them to my clients for signing.
Take care,

Benefit of 'ProcessControl' field in Shipment Type configuration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for