Boot problem for Ultra 60 running Solaris 9

I have a Sun Ultra 60 which, until the beginning of this month, was running Solaris 9 just fine. Following an emergency stop, the system refused to boot. At the ok prompt the boot command drew the response
Boot device: /pci@1f,4000/scsi@3/disk@0,0 file and args:
after which the system would hang, responding only to a mechanical power-off. The command boot -F failsafe gives the response
Boot device: /pci@1f,4000/scsi@3/disk@0,0 file and args -F failsafe
Boot load failed
The file just loaded does not appear to be executable
after which the system returns the ok prompt without hanging, but without booting either. All OpenBoot (v. 3.23) test and diagnostic commands return normal responses.
Raising the diag-level to max, changing the diag-device to disk, and setting diag-switch? to true gets the same responses, with the following additional information:
Boot device: /pci@1f,4000/scsi@3/disk0,0 File and args -F failsafe
Loading ufs-file-system package 1.4. 04 Aug 1995 13:02:54
FCode UFS Reader 1.12 00/07/17 15:48:16
Loading: /platform/SUNW, Ultra-60/failsafe
Loading: /platform/sun4u/failsafe
Boot load failed
The file just loaded does not appear to be executable
after which the system returns the ok prompt without booting.
Some fixes which do not work: I tried booting from CD, either the Solaris 9 software CDs or the Solaris 8 software CDs (obtained directly from Sun); these yield
Redirected to slice: 1
Loading: /platform/SUNW, Ultra-60/ufsboot
Loading: /platform/sun4u/ufsboot
after which the system hangs (only mechanical shutoff works), or if the flag -F failsafe is used, the failsafe file is loaded, ``the file just loaded does not appear to be executable,'' and the system returns the ok prompt. I also tried making a bootable floppy disk by installing a bootblock, the ufsboot executable, and the kernel/unix executable from a working SunBlade 150 onto a floppy. The command boot floppy works as above, and can be forced to load the ufsboot file from the floppy, but ``the file just loaded does not appear to be executable''; the system returns the ok prompt without booting, but at least without hanging.
Presumably this is a bootblock problem, or an OpenBoot problem. But how can I restore a system (restore what?) which will not boot in the first place? Any advice is much appreciated.

Some additional information which may (or may not) shed light on this problem: If the system hangs with diag-switch? set to true, then powering off and back on becomes rather difficult. The power-on led on the front panel may flash for several minutes, with no display on the monitor. If there is no CD in the cdrom drive and no floppy in the floppy drive, the led goes off (the system is on--I can hear the hard drives spinning) for about a minute, after which the test lights on the SCSI peripherals light up, and the monitor comes on. It shows a long series of ``Probing ... '' lines which look normal, followed by the usual banner, followed by ``Resetting memory at ...,'' which runs through a series of addresses. This is followed by ``Power On Self Test Failed Cause: SIMM U0701,'' then the usual ok prompt. Then all the OpenBoot commands except boot appear to operate normally. So--
1) Is this a hardware failure of one of the system's DIMM memory cards? Would that, in itself, account for the failure to boot, both from disk and from CD?
2) If so, and replacing this card would solve the problem, is the required DIMM a generic item or a component specific to the Ultra 60?
Any advice is much appreciated.

Similar Messages

  • Parallel port programming for a Sun Ultra 5 running Solaris 8

    Hi I'm trying to look for information about reading/writing to the parallel port of a Sun Ultra 5 running Solaris 8. I'd just like to see some basic programs written in C, nothing fancy, just reading and wrting to the port, getting the port address etc. toggling the lines.
    I've tried searching for this information and there is plenty of information about PC parallel port programming with windows or Linux. But there seems to be little for Sun's
    I've tried doing 'man ecpp' but that doesn't really give any clear example. What I need is an idiots guide.
    I've tried searching this Forum and I see that other people have asked the same question before but no one has replied to them. Why is this?
    Thanks if you can help.
    fishman.

    The key is gettting the port into diag mode. Here's a quickly little example that turns all the data pins on and then turns them off:
    #include <sys/types.h>
    #include <sys/conf.h>
    #include <sys/stat.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <stropts.h>
    #include <fcntl.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <sys/ecppio.h>
    int fd = 0;
    // ecpp structures
    ecpp_transfer_parms etp;
    ecpp_regs eregs;
    // returns -1 if error otherwise returns fd
    int openoutput()
    fd = open("/dev/ecpp0",O_RDWR);
    if (fd==-1) { return -1; }
    // default is 90
    etp.write_timeout = 10;
    // the big secret
    etp.mode = ECPP_DIAG_MODE;
    ioctl(fd,ECPPIOC_SETPARMS,&etp);
    return fd;
    unsigned char in()
    unsigned char data;
    // from the man pages
    ioctl(fd,ECPPIOC_GETREGS,&eregs);
    data = eregs.dsr;
    return data;
    void out( unsigned char data )
    write(fd,&data,1);
    int main( void )
    int dummy;
    openoutput();
    //all data pins on
    out( 255 );
    scanf("%d", &dummy);
    //all data pins off
    out( 0 );
    scanf("%d", &dummy);
    close( fd );
    return 0;
    }

  • Is it possible to make a DVD rom work on Sparc Ultra 5 running Solaris 2.6?

    I have been asked to try and get a DVD drive to work on a sparc ultra 5 running Solaris 2.6.
    Its been a while since I have done much with an ultra 5. My first reaction was no. However I thought that I should ask just in case it can be done.
    Its got to be Solaris 2.6 because of other applications running on it. I believe that the DVD has been installed using an IDE cable.
    Can anybody give me any advice?
    Thanks
    Phil

    I have a vague recollection that the filesystem structure of DVD versus CD
    (and perhaps its capacity differences... )
    I said the recollection was vague...
    are why the DVD optical media was not functional or usable.until Solaris 8.
    Try an experiment.
    Put such a drive into the system, get a copy of CDRTOOLS for Solaris 2.6(SPARC)
    [http://www.sunfreeware.com/indexsparc26.html]
    and see if you can do anything with it.
    Better yet, suggest to the system's owner that they go do it.
    It'd be a learning experience for them.
    I agree with Harold that Sol10 would be too much for that beastie.
    The sweet spot was Solaris 7 or 8.
    Edit: ... and give the Duke Stars to Harold.

  • Boot problems with snow leopard running bot camp

      I have used this computer with boot camp for over a year, when I try to boot the mac drive it freezes. If I boot using the option key I can boot into windows normally.  Even using restart from yhr bootcamp menu causes a freezup if i try to boot to apple. any suggestions?

    I had this same problem -- machine would boot, but loop at two blue screens before the login window. I sshed into the machine and checked /private/var/log/system.log and /var/log/secure.log which showed a unexpected character in /etc/authorization. Basically, the authorization file was corrupted (most likely by bad RAM.) The solution was to replace this file with one copied from another machine. I didn't match models, but did match OS when copying the file (i don't know if this matters at all), and as soon as the "cp" command was entered, the login window popped up. <-- totes awesome. The machine has been reliable since (all of 15 minutes)

  • We have a PCI-6110S to run our VIs. But, we are planing to buy another card (PCI-6024E​) to run real time PID vi. So, if they are installed at the same computer, would it be a problem for LabVIEW to run both of them at the same time.

    We have PCI-6110 S series installed in our computer. We are planing to purchase PCI-6024 E series card. They will be both installed at the same computer.
    1) I am wondering if we run both of them at the same time, would we have any problem?
    2) To run PID real time, can any E series of PCI card be used?
    Thanks...

    Hello Baho,
    1) Using Traditional NI-DAQ, there could be problems with the fact that the NI-DAQ driver is not multi-threaded; meaning that while waiting for one operation to complete, the driver could cause another operation to time out. On the other hand, DAQmx is multi-threaded, and would eliminate this problem. At the time of this writing though, DAQmx does not yet support simultaneous-sampling boards like the PCI-6110S. A good solution then would be to use Traditional DAQ for the 6110S and DAQmx for the E-series board, and they would by default run in separate threads.
    2) No, using a PCI E-Series board, the LabVIEW VI would have to run in a Windows OS and would not be Real Time or run deterministically. You can run the PID program in Windows, but the
    results could be inconsistent. The advantage of a Real Time is that the OS is deterministic or that the OS allows you to tightly control or determine the maximum time any function takes to operate. This kind of control of the maximum operation time is not possible with non-Real Time OSs such as Windows.
    If you would like to get set up with a Real Time System, I suggest you contact your Technical Sales Representative.
    Regards,
    Chad Evans
    National Instruments

  • Problems patching a box running Solaris 9

    We've been recommended to install patch 112233-12 on our Solaris box by sun - to check whether that stops various hangs and so forth.
    The problem is as follows:
    # uname -a
    SunOS $host 5.9 Generic_112233-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80
    # patchadd 112233-12
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    112233-12 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    # echo $?
    8
    # showrev -p
    No patches are installed
    Okay, first of all, this system has been patched with Suns clusterpatches several times, as indicated by our current kernel revision number in uname -a. Secondly, I fail to see how a return code of 8 (package not installed..) can be correct for a kernel patch ...
    So, any input on what is wrong here?
    regards,
    Rune Kristian Viken

    Rune,
    Solaris 9 kernel version 112233-11 is from April 2004, so your system's patch level is almost two years out of date. Version 112233-12 was from August 2004 and also has been obsoleted by other, subsequent, kernel patches..
    Glance at this other posting -
    http://supportforum.sun.com/sunos/index.php?t=msg&goto=9 422
    I suggest you work with your local Sun support center to get the entire Solaris 9 Recommended Patch Cluster onto the system.

  • Is there any problem for the board running HTT@1100mhz?

    Well, I'm running my system 275x4=1100HTT, can I keep this if it's stable or is it risky? I think I've read somewhere that HTT shouldn't go beyond 1000mhz, could someone elucidate me?
    Thanks.

    I used 1100(2200) for a while and it was stable, but any thing above that appeared unstable. This was at default voltage with winchester 3500+ processor. Maybe under upped mobo voltage things look different.. ;-)

  • Boot Problems for a205 s5879

    My Toshiba a205 - s5879 will not boot up.  It opens with the Toshiba logo screen  that says Toshiba Leading Innovation and the bottom says press f2 for setup and f12 for boot selection menu.  It will not go past this screen.  I have already tried all of the battery stuff on all of the forums.  I have a  Vista boot recovery disk and it doesn't do anything either.  I can hit f2 or f12, but it doen't do anything either.  Is there any solution?  I am desperate.  My business depends on this. 

    Hello, Have you tried holding the Zero Key while booting. This will bring up the recovery menu and this may be your last option. If it works you may look Here on how to complete this process. Refer to page 61.
    I am a student at DeVry University

  • Is there any problem for the board running HTT@1100mhz (k8n neo2)?

    Well, I'm running my system 275x4=1100HTT, can I keep this if it's stable or is it risky? I think I've read somewhere that HTT shouldn't go beyond 1000mhz, could someone elucidate me?
    Thanks.

    You'll get no advantage from doing so. Best quote i heard about htt(ldt) is
    Quote
    RGone(DFISt)
    Speeding HTT out of spec has about the same significance as 8 cars traveling the same direction on a 16 lane highway and you suddenly make the highway 20 lanes wide. It does not speed up anything. All 8 cars already had their own lane and adding lanes did nothing to speed up anything.
    most pps drop the 4 to 3 when going past say 255/260
    luck

  • Solaris 8 boot problems

    I'm new to Unix so please bear with me.
    We had a Ultra 10 running solaris 8 and the motherboard went. So we bought a replacement on ebay. Exact same hardware. Swapped out the drives with our old drives and booted. The new system was set up to boot off disk1 and our boot was on disk0. So at the ok prompt I typed "boot disk0" and up came the system. I should have stopped there since I know very little about Unix but I wanted to make it so that when the system rebooted it didn't first fail with disk1 and need the user to type "boot disk0". So after a little googling I found the "setenv boot-device disk0" command. I ran this command and then a reset and started to get a "The file just loaded does not appear to be executable." error. I then followed the directions here to reload the boot block.
    (http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:8Jkk36RiNOwJ:sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do%3Fassetkey%3D1-25-16778+The+file+just+loaded+does+not+appear+to+be+executable&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us)
    When I got to the "# fsck -F ufs -y /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0" command it started clearing sectors that it said unfixable and now I think I really messed up the drive. After that command I can't find any files on the drive. How can I retrieve the data off the drive and restore the system?
    Thanks
    Jason

    looks like your kernel path is corrupt. You will need to rebuild the os

  • Cpu socket looks strange-can be cause of boot problem?

    Actual question: can cpu socket like on attached picture cause boot problems?
    tinypic.com/r/1pxnxs/6
    (Some pins look strange while I am sure I did not do anything which can cause that)
    (Sorry was not able attach pic, so shared on external site - blame android?)
    I got problem with booting msi g33m motherboard, I tried various ways and was able to boot couple times, but after reboot the problem returns. When disassembly components for nth time, I noticed strange hole in cpu socket, so I wonder if it can be reason for boot problems? Currently fans run in ÷half speed when nothing connected to mb, if I connect gpu or sata drive, fans are pulsing, and led near power button on tower is blinking, but nothing more happens.

     The pin(s) are bent it seems and can be carefully bent back to proper alignment most of the time using tweezers and or tiny jewelers/eyeglass screwdriver.
     Yes the problem you describe can definitely be caused by poor pin contact with the pads on the CPU. Depending on what pins are bent or make poor contact there could be many different kinds of problems. In fact many more on newer ones with memory controller and other controllers in the CPU that used to be in the northbridge chip. If you or a friend, family member can't bend pin(s) back into alignment then possibly you could have a local jeweler or watch repair shop do it for you.

  • Solaris 10 beta 7 boot problem; stops after loading mmu32 module

    Hi,
    I'm having a problem getting beta 7 to boot on my system, using boot -v it appears to hang right after the mmu32 module is loaded.
    Is there a more detailed debug option I can use on the boot line to track down more precisely where the hang is occuring?
    Solaris WAS booting intermittedly for a while, ran DAMN WELL TOO!
    Hardware is a VIA CM266 motherboard, Via 1GHz C3 CPU. Solaris is installed on partition 2; NetBSD on 0, Fedora Core 3 on 1. I'm using grub but that doesn't seem to change behavior; booting off the Solaris install CD will hang in about the same place as well.
    Any info/pointers/debugging hints appreciated!
    -Rob

    Hello,
    Thanks for the informative post. I am trying to install Solaris 10 on an Athlon system. All works fine except for the nic card.
    Can you provide info on what nic card your system uses?
    The built in nic on my system is a Sis900 and i have not been able to locate a driver.
    I tried installing a Linksys Gigabit card (EG1032). Linksys supports Solaris drivers, but not Solaris 10. (I tried the Solaris 9 driver but it would not install. The error message said 32 bit drivers could not be installed in a 64 bit kernel)
    Thanks in advance.

  • WONK,BONZ , i thinki got the answer for the boot problem :)

    hi there wonk and bonz
    well mine i think u will be suspecting the psu bcos u have told me that my psu combined watt is lesser than 160
    hmmm well now ia around 2am here in singapore..
    no choice, i need to setup new computer for my friend , yet i have not settle my own one first...
    so i just cant wait and i take allthe tools out, and modify the L11 bridge to 1.7 volt by default...
    and guess what? when i set to 166 fsb , it manage to boot up normally without using the reset button , i think 20 out of 20 times that i have tried
    i am just suspecting why if the default voltage work so good while if i modify the voltage to non hw default, my pc will not boot up without the a press on the reset button .... , hmm i wonder is it bios problem or the board itself  ?(
    another thing is , my pc wont be stable at first, then i plug in the 4pin 12volt plug onto the board, and it boot up fine and running win Xp at 11.5 x170 now : )
    manage to finish super pi 1mb using 44 seconds  
    Hmmm well hope all this can help anyone out there with the booting problem and of course, they must be willing to connect the L11 bridge on their athlonXP
    Well of course i Hope Msi will look into these problem in order to fix that , hmmm dont tell me that i am lucky to fix it in such a way? Well hope Msi will regain its reputation back  )
    Thanxx Wonk and Bonz and everyone out there who helped me with advice  :D
    here is my specs again
    tBred A 1800 @2400(11.5X170)
    vcore 1.7 default(modified using L11)agp clock 85 ,
    PCI autodetect disabled
    2x kingston 512 333DDR at 2.5 6-3-3
    Wd800JB, Samsung 48x24x48x 8mb buffer
    Inno3d geforce4MX@300core x440mem

    hi backwoodz : )
    ohh its because if i alter the voltage through the bios, it wont boot up normally , just like what others complaining about , it wont boot up when u press the power button , but after u pressed the reset button , it will boot up if u a re lucky , sometimes i have to press more than 20 times of reset in order to have it boot up
    so i doubt that this msi board do have some flaw in terms of Vcore voltage management.
    its like if u pull out the power chord( which means your comp lose power completely) then u put it back and u push the power button , it wont boot up , the D Bracket will get stuck at random order sometimes cpu faulty and mostly its memory checking hang.....
    so in order to overclock my cpu without altering the BIOS vCore, i can only mod the athlon chip :P
    ohh dont worry about the bump, last few days i set up a pc for my friend , its a new chip , same to have kinda a thick black line on one side of the cpu DIE, i think its normal one
    maybe u guys never encounter the boot problem bcos :
    a)lucky :P
    b) u guys having good type of memory?
    c) good psu??
    but among all the user having boot problem i have seen in their specs having antec power supply, and corsair memory? so i dont think thats the main problem , i still suspect the way this board work out with the bios Vcore setting :P
    hopefully someone can confirm with me ab out this  : )

  • How to run solaris 10 and windows, dual booting.

    I installed solaris 10 first and then windows 2000 on my celeron pc. Nopw every time i start pc, it starts windows, coz of windows mbr.
    how to set at startup before booting the option which ask for solaris or windows? suggest me a easy way as i am a new user of solaris.

    The procedure to reinstall the Solaris boot sector
    (along with lots of info on dual booting) can be
    found here: http://multiboot.solaris-x86.org
    Another approach is to use the Windows 2000/XP boot
    menu. Assuming your S10 DVD is on D:\, type at a
    command prompt:
    copy
    d:\Solaris_10\Tools\Boot\usr\lib\fs\ufs\mboot
    c:\bootsect.solThen add the following line at the end of the
    C:\boot.ini file:
    C:\bootsect.sol="Solaris"(google "boot.ini" for more info on the above)
    Now Windows will display a boot menu where you can
    choose between Win2K and Solaris.
    BlaiseThe menu appears as you mentioned but there is another problem it tells me that there is no active partitions.
    i have to hards in my system, and it seems i screwed the booting thing during installation since this is the first time i install solaris.
    regards
    firas nemer

  • I have always heard that Macs are less likely to get infected with a virus.  My computer has been running much slower since I installed Maverick.  Just not sure what the problem might be.  Is there a way for me to run a diagnosis?

    I have always heard that Macs are less likely to get infected with a virus.  My computer has been running much slower since I installed Maverick.  Just not sure what the problem might be.  Is there a way for me to run a diagnosis?

    Some have found relief just by reinstalling, but it is more than likely incompatible third-party applications that slow it down.
    You will have to investigate to see what it is.
    Open Activity Monitor and see if anything is using a lot of CPU% or Memory. If they are, check to see if there is an update for them.
    Another place to look is the Console. See if anything is logging repeating messages with throttling and/or respawn in the All Messages list.
    Sometimes it is not that easy to root out the problems, but if you have anything that purported to clean, protect, optimize, maintain, or flush your system, then that is likely the cause.

Maybe you are looking for