BP assignment issue

I have two Business partners for a user, example 1 and 2.
Currently BP 2 has org structure relationship in PPOMA_BBP.But i need the assignment for BP 1.How to do this.I have checked in BP transaction under Identification tab for employee data,It contains only User name and it do not have Personnel Number.I have tried by deleting the BP 2.It is not working.
Please suggest me how to assign Personnel number for BUP003 for the user.
With Regards
Ram

Hi
Check with these FMs
BAPI_BUPA_CREATE_FROM_DATA BAPI for business partner creation as Organization,Person or Group in general role. Same BAPI can be used to create Contact Person for the Business Partner
BAPI_BUPR_RELATIONSHIP_CREATE Function module to establish the Business Partner
and Contact Person Relationship. Pass the Relationship Category as u2018BUR001u2019
BAPI_BUPA_ROLE_ADD Add Role to Business Partner for e.g. Sold to Party u2018CRM001u2019, Contact Person u2018BUP001u2019
BAPI_BUPA_CENTRAL_CHANGE
Regards,
Sachin

Similar Messages

Collection assign issue in OID provisioning environment

Hy Tom,
I am interested in LDAP with OID PROVISIONING in portal 10g application.
we create a register procedure.
however. i got an error message as ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: NULL index table key value.
After debuging, we found that issue result assign null value .
when we assign as
user_vals(counter2) := entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2);
It seems that that we can not assign entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2) to other var two time in procedure.
It is server configuration issue or code issue.
Thanks
Newweber
*********************** Code
PROCEDURE pre_add (     ldapplugincontext IN ODS.plugincontext,
               dn IN VARCHAR2,
               entry IN ODS.entryobj,
               rc OUT INTEGER,
               errormsg OUT VARCHAR2
IS
ret                INTEGER;
l_portal_user      wwsec_person.USER_NAME%type;
l_first_name      wwsec_person.FIRST_NAME%type;
l_last_name      wwsec_person.LAST_NAME%type;
l_email      wwsec_person.EMAIL%type;
l_work_phone      wwsec_person.WORK_PHONE%type;
l_mobile      wwsec_person.MOBILE_PHONE%type;
counter1           pls_integer;
counter2           pls_integer;
retval                pls_integer := -1;
s                integer;
user_session           DBMS_LDAP.session;
user_dn           varchar(256);
user_array           DBMS_LDAP.mod_array;
user_vals           DBMS_LDAP.string_collection;
user_binvals           DBMS_LDAP.blob_collection;
indx                number := 1;
BEGIN
l_portal_user      :=null;
l_first_name      :=null;
l_last_name      :=null;
l_email      :=null;
l_work_phone      :=null;
l_mobile      :=null;
l_description      :=null;
rc := 0;
errormsg :=null;
-- Create a mod_array
user_array := dbms_ldap.create_mod_array(entry.binattr.count + entry.attr.count);
-- Create a user_dn
user_dn := substr(dn,1,instr(dn,',',1,1))||'cn=users,dc=e-hms,dc=net';
FOR l_counter1 IN 1..entry.attr.COUNT LOOP
     FOR l_counter2 IN 1..entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval.COUNT LOOP
     ckerror('second loop get value--'|| entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname || '[' || l_counter1 || ']' ||'.val[' || l_counter2 || '] = ' ||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2));
if entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2)     is null then
ckerror('handle null attribule ');
else
-- get value
          ckerror('get value2'||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname);
IF entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='givenname' then
               l_first_name :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('givename/firstname--'||l_first_name);
     elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='sn' then
               l_last_name :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('sn/lastname--'||l_last_name);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='mail' then
               l_email := entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror(' email--'||l_email);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='mobile' then
               l_mobile :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('mobile--'||l_mobile);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='telephonenumber' then
               l_work_phone :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('work telphone--'||l_work_phone);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='cn' then
               l_portal_user :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('cn/username--'||l_portal_user);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='description' then
               l_description :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('description--'||l_description );
          else
          ckerror('handle other entry name--'||     entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname);
          ckerror('handle other entry--'||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2) );
          end if;
end if;
ckerror('end compare at second loop');
ckerror('NULL ASSIGN ISSUE FOR 72 --'||entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2));
user_vals(counter2) := entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2);
END LOOP;
ckerror('end first loop');
--- put ldap
dbms_ldap.populate_mod_array(user_array,DBMS_LDAP.MOD_ADD, entry.attr(counter1).attrname,user_vals);
user_vals.delete;
END LOOP;
processs other (l_firstname...) vars in SQL sataement
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
ckerror( 'Exception in PRE_ADD plugin. Error code is ' || TO_CHAR(SQLCODE));
ckerror( ' ' || Sqlerrm);
rc := 909;
errormsg := 'Error code:'|| rc||' exception: pre_add data';
END;

Hy Tom,
I am interested in LDAP with OID PROVISIONING in portal 10g application.
we create a register procedure.
however. i got an error message as ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: NULL index table key value.
After debuging, we found that issue result assign null value .
when we assign as
user_vals(counter2) := entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2);
It seems that that we can not assign entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2) to other var two time in procedure.
It is server configuration issue or code issue.
Thanks
Newweber
*********************** Code
PROCEDURE pre_add (     ldapplugincontext IN ODS.plugincontext,
               dn IN VARCHAR2,
               entry IN ODS.entryobj,
               rc OUT INTEGER,
               errormsg OUT VARCHAR2
IS
ret                INTEGER;
l_portal_user      wwsec_person.USER_NAME%type;
l_first_name      wwsec_person.FIRST_NAME%type;
l_last_name      wwsec_person.LAST_NAME%type;
l_email      wwsec_person.EMAIL%type;
l_work_phone      wwsec_person.WORK_PHONE%type;
l_mobile      wwsec_person.MOBILE_PHONE%type;
counter1           pls_integer;
counter2           pls_integer;
retval                pls_integer := -1;
s                integer;
user_session           DBMS_LDAP.session;
user_dn           varchar(256);
user_array           DBMS_LDAP.mod_array;
user_vals           DBMS_LDAP.string_collection;
user_binvals           DBMS_LDAP.blob_collection;
indx                number := 1;
BEGIN
l_portal_user      :=null;
l_first_name      :=null;
l_last_name      :=null;
l_email      :=null;
l_work_phone      :=null;
l_mobile      :=null;
l_description      :=null;
rc := 0;
errormsg :=null;
-- Create a mod_array
user_array := dbms_ldap.create_mod_array(entry.binattr.count + entry.attr.count);
-- Create a user_dn
user_dn := substr(dn,1,instr(dn,',',1,1))||'cn=users,dc=e-hms,dc=net';
FOR l_counter1 IN 1..entry.attr.COUNT LOOP
     FOR l_counter2 IN 1..entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval.COUNT LOOP
     ckerror('second loop get value--'|| entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname || '[' || l_counter1 || ']' ||'.val[' || l_counter2 || '] = ' ||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2));
if entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2)     is null then
ckerror('handle null attribule ');
else
-- get value
          ckerror('get value2'||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname);
IF entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='givenname' then
               l_first_name :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('givename/firstname--'||l_first_name);
     elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='sn' then
               l_last_name :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('sn/lastname--'||l_last_name);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='mail' then
               l_email := entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror(' email--'||l_email);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='mobile' then
               l_mobile :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('mobile--'||l_mobile);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='telephonenumber' then
               l_work_phone :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('work telphone--'||l_work_phone);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='cn' then
               l_portal_user :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('cn/username--'||l_portal_user);
          elsif entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname ='description' then
               l_description :=entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2);
               ckerror('description--'||l_description );
          else
          ckerror('handle other entry name--'||     entry.attr(l_counter1).attrname);
          ckerror('handle other entry--'||entry.attr(l_counter1).attrval(l_counter2) );
          end if;
end if;
ckerror('end compare at second loop');
ckerror('NULL ASSIGN ISSUE FOR 72 --'||entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2));
user_vals(counter2) := entry.attr(counter1).attrval(counter2);
END LOOP;
ckerror('end first loop');
--- put ldap
dbms_ldap.populate_mod_array(user_array,DBMS_LDAP.MOD_ADD, entry.attr(counter1).attrname,user_vals);
user_vals.delete;
END LOOP;
processs other (l_firstname...) vars in SQL sataement
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
ckerror( 'Exception in PRE_ADD plugin. Error code is ' || TO_CHAR(SQLCODE));
ckerror( ' ' || Sqlerrm);
rc := 909;
errormsg := 'Error code:'|| rc||' exception: pre_add data';
END;

Vendor Payment-Cheque Assignment Issue

Hi,
I am facing one of the issue related to vendor payment. Issue description is as below.
1. We do have weekly payment parameter creation (F110) and one of the parameter was created on Wednesday.
2. Another job use to run for that parameter (where vendor name is mention) and creates payment document for open item for mention vendor (clearing document)
3. Then cheque will gets assign to all those payment documents created in step 2 using program RFFOUS_C.
4. There are total 616 documents selected by program RFFOUS_C but out of which this program assign cheques only for 590 documents and remaining 26 payment documents kept as it is and no cheques were assign and not even consider in cheque file too.
5. I am confuse why system not consider these 26 documents were I didnu2019t see any difference in document and all documents were having same payment method too.
Can someone advise me where could be the problem?
Thanks
Parag

No. If you see my original issue i mention in that all the documents clear successfully. Only 26 clearing document dont have cheques assing and thats why vendor payment is hanging. Say for example if you go in FB03 and put your clearing document and once inside that document click on environment menu where CHEQUE INFORMATION is option. If Cheque number will be assign to that particular document then system will immidiately show you cheque details. In my case no cheque is assing by program RFFOUC_C. So why is it so?
Parag

Analysis Authorization - Assignment Issue

Hi,
Created a analysis auth: and assigned the same to one user. But the issue is that the assignment holds true for all the users. how can i make it assigned to one single user? Is this suppose to work this way or am i assuming things?
Thanks,
Sri

Hi Sri,
I doubt your issue.
please search the forums first before posting questions. This avoids redundant effort and saves time and resources of your peers.
There are many threads available if you search with the search criteria Authorization.
Cheers
SAP NetWeaver BI Organisation

SAP MRS Assignment Issue!

Hi,
I have an Issue after upgrading to MRS 900.
I have an order created and the opertaions are having different Control Keys
Operation 10 - Control Key Z001
Opertioan 20 - Control Key ZFAC
Operation 30 - Control Key Z001
In the configuration i allowed Scheduling for operations only with Control Key Z001, it is perfect only the operation control Key Z001 is flown to MRS planning board. that is operation 10 and 30.
When i do the assignment in planning board for operation 10, the assignment remains after saving the planning board which is correct.
when i do the assignment for the operation 30 for the same or different resource, it gets assgined and when i save the planning board assignment disappears.
The problem is for the subsequent operations of the operation with Control key ZFAC. So able to schedule 10 and unable to schedule 30.
Rgds
Sudhir

Hi,
implement the Note - 2038445
Rgds,
Sudhir

Result Set re assign issue.

Just a novice question. I have a code like
ResultSet rs = psmt.executeQuery("some query here");
// perform iterate on rs.
rs = psmt.executeQuery("some other query here");
on finally,
rs.close();
My question is will it create two instance on rs and left one closed and another unclosed or will it close both the ResultSet?
Regards,
A.

Ananth Durai wrote:
The real question is on issuing finally {rs.close}, will it close both instance?No, it won't. close() is invoked on the currently referenced object. Which is why I pointed out that you should close resources when done with them. Before even thinking of assigning the same variable to another instance, and before the variable goes out of scope.
If you need two ResultSets in the same scope, use two variables. Than you can close both in the same finally block.
will it cause memory leak?Probably. I don't do JDBC, so I won't categorically say it will.
db

PO release - Wrong agent assignment issue

Hello friends,
i have a strange issue with PO release strategy . A particular PO has been assigned to release group EG and release code F2 .
But F2 has no agent assignment defined . However , The PO approval is going for another agent belonging to release code F1 . there are no user exist or BADI defined .
Please assist me what could be the issue ? i do not have debug access and the data is not consistent on test system .
thanks
Raghu V

Hi,
Which Workflow is used?
If it is the standard one then rule 20000027 is used for agent determination.
Kind regards, Rob Dielemans

Dynamic VLAN assignment issue with ACS & WLC

I have configured an ACS (v4.2) & a WLC 4402 (5.2.193.0) according to the document listed at: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008076317c.shtml
When I attempt to authenticate a user in the ACS local user database, I receive an auth failure. I have enabled debugging in the WLC's CLI and I see that I get an authentication failure from the ACS. Upon reviewing the ACS's 'failed attempts' log, I see the username I attempt to authenticare with but it reports 'CN user unknown' even though this user is the local database.
During troubleshooting, I discovered that if I modify the AAA client for the WLC and change it to 'Cisco Aironet' rather than 'Cisco Airespace', authentication works perfectly, the proper user is authenticated to the local database and I am able to connect to the SSID. The only issue is that because I'm now using Aironet instead of Airespace, the IETF attributes 064, 065, and 081 (VLAN, 802, and the VLAN ID respectively) do not properly assign the VLAN that the user needs to be on.
Am I missing something?

I determined that a NAP was blocking my authentication using Airespace and can successfully authenticate with both Aironet and Airespace now. I also reviewed the debug output of both types of connections and I can see the proper attributes coming through, but the wireless clients just won't assign to the right VLAN interface.
I've reviewed all of the configuration settings per the document about 40 or 50 times now and I am certain I'm not missing anything. I do indeed have override enabled but the configured interface 'management' is still the one the user is assigned to every time, even in the client connection details under the monitor tab. ARGH!!

Vendor and Account Assignment Issues

Hi All,
Iam Working in ECS SRM 5.0,
When We are trying to creat SC, we are getting following errors :
1.Vendor 0000100029 not intended for purch. org. (Item Sourcing Strategy & Plan Consulting )
SOS is automatically assiged to particular product ID thru Purchasing Contract (Purchasing Contract created locally).Vendor is assigned to the Purchasing Contract.Vendor is properly mapped to the respective Purchasing Organization as recored in the table BBPM_BUT_FRG0061.Purchasing Contract is also mapped to the same Purchasing Organization of Vendor.
2.Account 50011 requires an assignment to a CO object (Item Sourcing Strategy & Plan Consulting )
2.1 Error in account assignment for item 1
Account assignment Categories and G/L Acc. are properly maintained and activated in SRM for each Product Category. same values for G/L Acc. and Acc.Assignment Categories are maintained in R/3. In R/3 when we checked in the tables SKA1,SKB1 & SKAT all these entries are maintained properly.
In our project Scenario we don't require CO Component only AP Component is Configured for our Business Requirement.
Full points will be rewarded for the solution.
([email protected])

Hi
Please go through this ->
Please implement following SAP OSS Notes ->
Note 1026168 - Vendor &1 not intended for purch. org. &2
[ This is caused due to a program error. The reason for this error is, purchasing organization and purchasing group are always assigned at header level and in this case SRM is passing the item guid to determine the backend purchasing organization and purchasing.group. The header guid should be passed instead. ]
Q 3: Why does the system issue message KI 235 - 'Account & requires an assignment to a CO object'?
Answer ->
--> In SRM, you always have to post to a G/L account and to a CO object. Exceptions: Direct material scenario - account assignment occurs in the OLTP regardless of what was previously entered in SRM. For external requirements, the primary system is the OLTP from which the demand is issued and sent to SRM. In this case, account assignment changes are not allowed in SRM because this would lead to inconsistencies (in follow-on documents as well) when compared to the primary system.
--> In /OBA5, you can suppress the message or define it as a warning message. Since only error messages are transferred to SRM (BBP_PD 047), the message then no longer is issued in SRM. Do not consult the FI/CO team when implementing the changes.
(See related SAP Consulting Notes - Release-Independent
Note 815849 - FAQ: Account assignment system response)
Hope this will definitely help. Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Shared services- Access Assign issue for Essbase

Hi All,
I need to associate Filter with a group in Shared Services, but when I go to Application Groups, right click on the Application name and select "Assign access control", but in the list of Groups that come in the very first window, i dont see all the grousp listed there, has anyoen seen thsi issue before and knows teh fix for it?

We dont have direct Role provisioning to teh groups. Here we actualy have a group AllUsers and have added all other grousp as "GRoup membere" to thsi group/ Now this AllUsers group has teh roel provisioned to it. So in such a case, to see the grousp listed under "Assign Access Control" do they need to eb provisioned individually as well at group level, or teh above scenario that I mentioned also works fine?

SAP IDM 7.1 Role assignment issue

Hello IDM Experts,
I am facing one critical issue here. We have connected SAP GRC with SAP IDM for risk analysis and CUP approvals and then once the approvers have approved the requests, IDM assigns these approved roles to users in backend SAP Systems.
We are now facing issue here past 1-month. Before we never faced this issue.
The issue is when the Roles are approved from GRC-CUP AC 5.3, post the approvals, the IDM is pulling the data and some of the roles are not getting assigned in SAP Backend systems. In the 1st and 2nd attempt it is not getting assigned however sometimes in the 3rd attempt it is getting assigned. This kind of weird behavior we have come across first time. Has anyone come across such issues before?
What could be the possible reason for the roles not getting assigned in SAP Backend system from IDM?
We checked everything right from dispatchers, connectors, workflow, SQL Logs, Job logs but we are unable to figure out the reason for this issue.
Do we need to restart the dispatcher or is there any issue with cache memory?
Can anyone help here to resolve this High Priority issue?
Thanks in advance!

IDM Experts,
Can I get response on this topic from the experts?
Will restarting the dispatchers help in this situation? Is this related to housekeeping issue of dispatcher.
Why are some roles from IDM are not getting assigned in SAP Backend system? Also it is getting rejected 1st and 2nd time and during 3rd time it is getting approved. Please advise
Regards
Malini Rao

OSB, xquery and Assign issue

Hello all
I have an issue that I cannot quite understand...
I have a very simple proxy service, that I would like to receive an xml of this form:
<SO so_att1="soatt" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="Split.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
 <MLI mli_att1="mli1att">
 <LI li_att1="li1_att1">
 <name>String</name>
 <value>String</value>
 <action>String</action>
 </LI>
 <LI li_att1="li2_att1">
 <name>String</name>
 <value>String</value>
 <action>String</action>
 </LI>
 <LI li_att1="li3_att1">
 <name>String</name>
 <value>String</value>
 <action>String</action>
 </LI>
 <LI li_att1="li4_att1">
 <name>String</name>
 <value>String</value>
 <action>String</action>
 </LI>
 <LI li_att1="li5_att1">
 <name>String</name>
 <value>String</value>
 <action>String</action>
 </LI>
 <name>String</name>
 <value>String</value>
 <action>String</action>
 </MLI>
</SO>
in order to transform it to a general data model of this form:
<CDM>
 <Item so_att="soatt" mli_att="mli1att">
 <name>MLI1_name</name>
 <value>MLI1_value</value>
 <action>MLI1_action</action>
 </Item>
 <Item so_att="soatt" mli_att="mli1att" li_att="li1att">
 <name>LI1_name</name>
 <value>LI1_value</value>
 <action>LI1_action</action>
 </Item>
 <Item so_att="soatt" mli_att="mli1att" li_att="li2att">
 <name>LI2_name</name>
 <value>LI2_value</value>
 <action>LI2_action</action>
 </Item>
 <Item so_att="soatt" mli_att="mli1att" li_att="li3att">
 <name>LI3_name</name>
 <value>LI3_value</value>
 <action>LI3_action</action>
 </Item>
 <Item so_att="soatt" mli_att="mli1att" li_att="li4att">
 <name>LI4_name</name>
 <value>LI4_value</value>
 <action>LI4_action</action>
 </Item>
 <Item so_att="soatt" mli_att="mli1att" li_att="li5att">
 <name>LI5_name</name>
 <value>LI5_value</value>
 <action>LI5_action</action>
 </Item>
</CDM>
The common idea is to split the XML in to pieces with attributes inheritance. I have created 3 Assign actions. the 1st one has the xquery for seperating the MLI nodes with the correct attribues:
for $i in (1 to fn:count($body/MLI))
return
<Item so_att1 = "{ data($body/@so_att1) }"
mli_att1 = "{ data($body/MLI[$i]/@mli_att1) }">
for $name in $body/MLI[$i]/name
return
<name>{ data($name) }</name>
for $value in $body/MLI[$i]/value
return
<value>{ data($value) }</value>
for $action in $body/MLI[$i]/action
return
<action>{ data($action) }</action>
</Item>
And it is saved in variable MLI
The 2nd one is similar to this and saves to variable LI while the 3rd assign concats the variables like this: fn:concat('<CDM>', $MLI, $LI, '</CDM>') and saves in new variable...
My problem comes, when I run on server the proxy. It is echoing (of course, cause there is no routing) but the incoming message passes only from third assign, ignoring the first and the second... Any idea why this is happening? The xqueries while tested inside the XQuery editor, works like charm...
Thank you in advance

Not sure if this is what you mean, but if you want to store elements in a variable during your XQuery you can use the "let" command.
This way you can use them during your Xquery but it doesn't replace the Assign or Replace action in your message flow.
let $x := 1
let $y := $x + 1

Sculpture automation & Controller assignment issues

Hey guys,
I have an instance on Sculpture in a project i am working on. Everything is fine until the point where i try to manually write some automation in the arrange window. As soon as I select the parameter i want to change (LFO1 rate in this case) the sound of sculpture gets all weird and sounds nothing like the one before.
Is this some kind of bug? has anyone encountered this?
I also have another question and as im posting this anyway ill just put it here.
Im trying to set up a nanoKontrol2. Ctrl+k, created several modes (fader, es2, ultrabeat etc). I've assigned several buttons to switch between the modes but the assigned functions wont operate until i also choose that particular instrument in the arrange window.
Is there a way around this? i.e switch bet modes and actually affect that instrument without having to use a mouse to choose it?
Im also having problems with the fader mappings when trying to control volume levels of multi output instruments exs24, ultrabeat. When i move a fader of the overall instrument only the volume of one (unassigned) fader of lets say output 3-4 of that instrument will get affected. Im i doing something wrong?
Cheers

I'm not sure if this will help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvBmsMB2XSQ&feature=PlayList&p=5B14BDD35A022ED3&i ndex=45
I spent a whole day following the above advice, assigning controls for my M-Audio keyrig 25 to 18 different logic native plugins (Channel EQ, Guitar Amp Pro, Tape Delay, etc etc). And then assigning'no-mode mode change' (if you follow me) to different letters on my 'caps lock keyboard'. This worked great yesterday. Now today it's all flaky: The caps lock keyboard doesn't change modes anymore, and only one of the assignment 'maps' seems to work. (Even making sure all target plug ins were on the same SELECTED track, and the plugin in question had 'focus' by clicking on it). Does anyone know if there's a known issue with controller assignment recall in Logic Pro (8)?
JD

CUP UWL and HR assignement issues

Hello all,
Does anyone know if:
1/ is there a possibility to send a request for approvel to the UWL task list or only to the CUP task list?
2/ is there a restriction of opening a request for another user based on an organizational assignment? (the requestor will be able to open a request for a user who is in the same HR org unit as the requestor)
Thanks

I am using Role mapping in my company.
Our need for role mapping is due to our CUA composite structure containing shell roles with pointers (RFC target destinations) to the child systems containing single roles with authorisations.
Mapping overcame a limitation in RAR to analyse the authorisations obtained through RFC pointers.
So far we have only used a sample set of composites with singles mapped to them but will be uploading thousands next week.
The potential issues you face depend on your authorisation concept in use.
For example, in your mapping reflects your Composite/Single Role assignment, then you will face the following.
Adding a composite using CUP will also add the singles mapped to the composite. So in the CUA system you will see the same single role twice, one in blue (assigned via composite) and one in black (assigned via CUP Mapping).
I'm happy to discuss further on the phone if easier where we can share more of our challenges.
Thanks,
Babak

No Portal Roles assigned issue

Hi Experts ,
We had recently integrated CRM with portal , but some users inspite of having the portal roles assigned to their id were getting an Access Denied page (we had customized the "no portal roles assigned " error page ) . Knowing the dependency of portal on IE and browser settings , this issue is sometimes resolved by clearing cache , cookies , and changing a few browser settings etc on IE 6.0 . If this doesn't work then upgrading to IE 7.0 definetly helps . Since this is just a workaround , I would like to know if anyone has experienced such a thing before and has a solution for this . Your inputs will be highly appreciated .
Regards
Mayank

Hi Mayank,
This is an error which happens when there is No roles assigned to the user. I am not sure how your systems are designed for User Management. Say for example in some cases LDAP is used to maintain Group to User Relationships and Portal Roles are connected to Groups therfore all users in the group is assigned to the Role. In some cases UME is used.
Having said that you can disable the cache for the browser. You have to compromise with the performance however, this will ensure that everytime the user logs in, the request will always go to the server.
Regards
Avik

Smart list assign issue

hi all,
How to give the smartlist datasource or data values using csv file or txt file and assign it to the entity dimension or any of the standard dimension
the source csv file for smart list
NEWBIE,Entity
one,Uk
25,US
marks,India
Stud,India
is this correct way ?
How to smart list data source iam confused
Regards
Shenna

Hi Alp Burak,
Thank you very much for you help and the link. My company is IT research company and has many branches in all over the world. basically we are creating smart list for Japan, Canada, and USA. In this case I not sure how many employees are there but it is my VP's requirement.
I am going to browse your given link will update you with the results...
Again I will welcome anyone's comments and help in this issue and thanking to everyone in a advance.
Thanks and Regards,
Safi

BP assignment issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for