Budget checking not happening
HI guru,
Budget checking is not properly working. we have two object (fund center and commitment item)
i create a derivation rule
source field - company code and in target field - fund center ,commitment item.
i aloted budget in FMBBC for that paritcular fund center to commitement item
post a documet in FB60 but my budget checking is not working properly. then i also trace in derivation rule i put the gl account no and i checked there is no error comming. but i am unable to find out the reason why budget is not checking properly.
Thanks and regards
Hi,
Your derivation strategy is not clear... If you have only company code as source field (by the way, this is a stange and rare parameter to base your strategy on), how do you derive specific fund centre and commitment item, which are relevant for the posting?
In the trace, you see the values coming; updating them manually, won't simulate the actual posting. Revise your derivation strategy and read relevant material on SDN forum: this issue is widely discussed and there is no room of opening a new thread for this.
Regards,
Eli
Similar Messages
-
Budget check not active for commitment & actual budget
Budget check runs fine while checking budget limits for Production order and vendor invoices i.e does not allow to further create production order and vendor invoices if budget limits exceeds the released budget.
But this budget check does not work on procurement processes ( PR, PO &GR).
No warning or error message pop out and the system allows to further create PR/PO/GR beyond released budget
What config changes are required to make budget check active for procurement processes.Hi vishal,
Check the Transcation groups in Budget tolerance limits.
PScostsbudget---define tolerance limits.
If you assign ++ All Activity groups it will activate the Budget avaliability control for all Transcation.
Check the avaliability control in OPS9 whether the activation type is 1 or 2 . If 2 run the avliability control CJBN.
Hope this will helpful,
Regards, -
Availibility check not happening after credit block is removed for order
Hi All,
When we are removing the credit block on a sales order through report RVKRED09, the availibility check is not performed again because the qty in sales order is not confirmed.
As per my understanding when the report RVKRED09 is run, the sales order is called in background and the credit status is changed and then subsequently, the user exit MV45AFZF is called. In this exit, the values in wa-ybuk-cmgst is compared against wa-xbuk-cmgst. if i think wa-ybuk-cmgst is A and wa-xbuk-cmgst is B, then it means the credit blocked is removed and the return code is 8 which means availibility check is to be performed.
However in our case availibility check is not happening since the values of wa-ybuk-cmgst and wa-xbuk-cmgst are same which is B i..e the credit block is not removed...but however the report RVKRED09 shows that cedit status is changed.
Something is happening somwhere which is causing this. could any one guide. Also what is the program name which confirms the availibility check in sales order and also what is the program name which changes the credit status for a sales order in VBUK table.
regards
sachinHi
So as per your query , you have gone with the user exit in the program MV45AFZF , so check wheather any subprogram has been included where availability check wont happen.So just take the help of ABAP;er and then check wheather any program has been included related to availability check.
Regards
Srinath -
Budget checking for services with "Unlilmited" indicator set
hi friends,
Under normal cases, the budget checking is happening properly for the services in a project.
But I have certain service activities where I require to set the "Unlimited" indicator set (in the service specification screen)and some other services where I set a value limit to the unplanned services (in the Limit section of the service specification screen).
In these cases, the budget checking is not happening as expected by the standard methods. Please note that the availability control is active.
Please help me out.
regards
Pratap.VHi Nitni,
Thanks for the prompt replies.
Now you have struck the point. Assume I have a budget of rs.50000. The planned services in PR is of Rs.20000 and I have set a limit of rs.50000 for the unplanned services in the same PR. Now my commitment is Rs.20000 only which is right.
In our specific case, the budget check will not happen at PR.
Now I am creating a PO of the above PR. So PO commt is rs.20000.
After this, when I go to the service entry sheet and enter a planned services of rs.20000 and unplanned services of rs.40000 (remember i set a 50000 limit for unplanned services in the PR). Hence my total actual cost is rs.60000. Obviously I want the system to do a budget check here and stop the user at the time of service entry sheet. But this is not happening. The budget check is not happening at service entry sheet if I am having any unplanned services in the PR or if I tick the "unlimited" indicator against a particular service.
Hope I have put my point clearly.
regards
Pratap -
Budget checking during proucerment and consumption
Hi experts
My client is having two budgets. procurement budget and consumption budget.Both are having different figures.
PR,PO,GR,Inv and Payment is related to procurement budget.and Goods Issue linked to Consumption Budget.
While Issuing Goods they asking budget check.
i have created payment budget Here, while doing PR budget check will be done.
While doing Goods issue consumption GLs will hit and budget check should happen at consumption GL level.
now i am using fund center and commitment item master data. i am geting bit confusion regarding some issue.
1. i want to know can i map derivation rule procurement budget and consumption by using only fund center and commitment item with payment budget type .
OR
2. Can i create another master data fund for both proc.and consumptn budget for maping derivation rule.
thanks & regardsHi alex
thank a lot for your reply. i need some sugestion i configured the derivaion like this. i used only fund center and commitment item
GL account to Commitment item
GL account to Valuation class to Commitment item
Cost element to commitment item
Cost center to fund center
Commitment Item to Fund Center
for procurement i configured throught GL account to Valuation class to Commitment item
and for goods issued(consumption) i configured Cost center to fund center (budget checking required during goods issue)
let me know if i did any mistake
thanks
soraj -
I have clicked the Apple > Software Update,a window pops up with >Failed to check for updates.
The operation could not completed. >Operation not permitted. This is only occuring now.It did not happen
before.The Apple store in Sydney NSW Australia only reinstalled 10.7.4 Lion yesterday.I have downloaded my
Itunes song and reinstalled Intego antivirus.Will somebody please advise me what to do.It is 4:03 PM Saturday
here in Koolewong.
richard.Uninstall Intego...you don't need it.
-
Why budget check does not work with account assigment distrib. by quantity?
Hi Gurus,
I have an issue in the budget check for Purchase Order (PO).
I'm using the FM B31I_ACC_PURCHASE_ORDER_CHECK.
The case is next:
1 Item with 21 account assignment type AS and distribution by quantity:
ASSET_NO QUANTITY
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 1
9 1
10 1
11 1
12 1
13 1
14 1
15 1
16 1
17 1
18 1
19 1
20 1
21 1
All account assignment are for the same G/L account, fund, functional area...
The price for each item is $2,499.14, then total price is $52,481.94 (2,499.14 * 21).
I debugged the FM B31I_ACC_PURCHASE_ORDER_CHECK and found that in FM BBP_PD_COMMITMENT_FILL_BAPI it's making a rounding with percentage:
The system assume next:
Each item is 4.76% of total (result of divide 100% / 21 = 4.76190476...) but the percentage is rounded to 2 decimals.
Then it makes the conversion by the amount corresponding to each item:
($52,481.94 * 4.76) / 100 = $2,498.1403
Finally the budget is checked by $52,460.95 (2498.1403 * 21).
But available budget is $52,481.90, the check pass, but really there are 4 cents missing (total price is $52,481.94).
Can somebody say to me if this is a standard behavior?
It can be fixed with configuration?
The problem is for multiple account assignment with distribution by quantity and:
(100 / quantity) = not integer (or have more than 2 decimals)
For example: with quantity 20 it works because 100% / 20 = 5.00%, then the budget is check exactly.1503317 - System Behavior for Account Distribution between SRM and R/3 system
When using distribution by Value in a SRM document this value is not correct and a rounding occurs once this document is transferred to ERP system.
Cause
It is not possible transfer documents to the back end system with distribution by value, due to a back end restriction.
Resolution
The following information is the system behavior in R/3 / ERP:
in R/3, there is accounting distribution only by quantity or percentage. So when distribution by value is used, a rounding will always take place.
in R/3, the use of value based distribution in SRM will lead to rounding differences.
Distribution by quantity is allowed in SRM and MM side. However MM do not accept is distribution by value. This is internally converted to distribution percentage based.
Keywords
Distribution by Quantity, Distribution by Percentage, Distribution by Value -
Do not want Budget check & Commitment value for purchase Requisition
Hi Experts,
I hope you all are doing well.
My client's requirement is that at the time of Creation of Purchase Requisition there should be no budget check against WBS element and also Commitment value should not be for Purchase Requisition.
Please suggest.
Thanks & RegardsHi Gokul,
Thanks for ur quick reply.
I have done changes in tolerence limit (activated it for PO only).
Now i created 1 Project PR of more than value of budget (system didnt check the Budget against WBS) but when i am trying to create PO with reference to same PR, system is giving error of budget. That is OK for me.
Now my requirement is to not take PR value as commitment in my reports, i want only PO value in Commitment column of repport.
I have read all 3 notes suggested by you. Can u tell me whcih one should i implement to stop PR value as commitment in reports.
Thanks & Regards -
how can I save a jepg file in lower case letters? I check the use lower case box in preferences but it's not happening. PSCC
Let's try a preferences reset: (Windows)
Press and hold Control - Shift - Alt immediately upon cold-starting Photoshop. If you get the keys down quickly enough - and you have to be VERY quick - it will prompt you to confirm deletion of your established preferences, which will lead to them all being set to defaults. -
My primary keyboard is English UK and secondary one Spanish. Until now when switching keyboards languages the spell check would automatically change to the desired language. Somehow it does not happen anymore. Any ideas on how to fix this?
The keyboard doesn't normally play any role in Apple apps regarding spellcheck. That is determined by system prefs/keyboard/text/spelling. Go the setup item at the bottom of the list and make sure that British English and Spanish are the only two boxes checked, and then set it to Automatic. How well it works varies a lot. You may also need to check Edit > Spelling and Grammar > Show Spelling and Grammar.
If you are still using Pages 4, spellcheck is determined by Inspector > Text > More > Language. Make sure that is set to the right thing for what you want to do. -
I have checked “Search for text when I start typing” but it is not happening since your latest update. This is very important to me as I keyboard - not use the mouse. What can I do? Also, before the last update I could leave the window (alt+tab) and return and just type and it would type it is the search box. Now I have to take my hand off the keyboard and get the mouse three times for every search, slowing my work way, way down. What other flag do I need to put this back the way it was? Should I also remove the “Automatically check for updates” so that this will not happen again? Please, please help.
Hi CynthiaP,
You should look at the article [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Preferences_not_saved Preferences not saved]. It may just be an issue with the pref file!
Hopefully this helps! -
Changes in Budget checking during creation of purchase requisition
Hi Experts,
My client wants changes the current Internal Order BUget checking. Currently Budget checking happens with availability control ie. 105% Suppose current budget is 8000. It will add 5% and Purchase reqn checks the fund available with 8400 less budget utlised, but client wants 8000 less budget utilised as they want to keep 5% aside for the unforseen cases.
Cilent does not want to change the current availability setting i.e 105%, retaining that availability check, client wants to check the availability excluding tolerance. What is the solution for this.
Appriciate your immediate response.
Thanks & regards
Veda PanditHi,
I think you shall set 100 % limit for purchase order and purchase requisition and 105% for good receipt.
You can do so in customizing "Define Tolerance Limits for Availability Control" , using the activity group.
Paolo -
Budget check for purchase order
Hi everyone!
We have NO problems with budget check for the SC. But when we create a PO and exceeds the budget no message are displayed. The only thing that happens is that the PO gets status "error in process". But if we change the PO (still exceeding budget) we receive a correct message. Is this a program error?
Sincerely
AndersHi
Temporarily deactivate budget check: SRM: using Badi
BBP_BUDGET_CHECK, AVC Backend customizing.
Did you do budget check while creating sc? what did it says?
Refere this old notes.
Note 740933 - Incorrct purchasing budget for currencies w/o decimal
places
Note 747143 - User purchasing budget in pop-up incorrectly formatted
regards
Muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Nov 5, 2008 3:08 PM -
Budget Checks in Classic for PO
Hi everyone,
We have a doubt with the budget checks in classic scenario and we need your help. We know when we create a SC, SRM verifies the budget in the ERP as a simulation. If there is not budget the system sends a error, but what happend with the PO?
For example:
Case 1: We create a SC. The SC is sent to SoCo. In SoCo, the strategic purchaser creates a bid invitation. A bidder wins the process and we whant to create a PO. When the budget is verified? The budget is checked before the PO is created in ECC or when? If there is not budget, the PO would not be created in ECC??
Case 2: We create a SC. The SC is sent to SoCo. In SoCo, the strategic purchaser assigns a contract then, he wants to create a PO. When the budget is verified? The budget is checked before the PO is created in ECC or when? If there is not budget, the PO would not be created in ECC??
We are working in SRM 7 with ECC 6 EhP 4.
BR
IváHi,
In classic deployment, commitment of budget only happens when the PR or PO follow-on documents are created in the ERP system. SRM SC has no capability to lock commitment in the ERP when the SC is released.
If you are looking at the commitment locking in the ERP when SC is released, you may like to look at the SRM PPS which has this capability in the extended classic deployment.
Regards.
YS -
BAPI_NETWORK_MAINTAIN Budget Check
Hello Experts,
Does anybody know why this BAPI FM is doing the Budget Check and Determining Costs when I Create the Network Activities for a Project with it?
All the activities have no price or cost, and I have nu material components in the project.
This Budget Check takes a lot of minuts, and I really don't need it.
Thank you.Hi
Network will be created individually but the reading happens as project, WBS, activities and then network. When you upload the activities system will check for budget on WBS element. System may try to read the activities under network first (though they are not created) and thus checks for budget. I am not sure but when I checked up with SAP this is the answer from them.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Message and no sounds - anyone with the same problem?
Hi, since a few days I have always the same message (usually after I switched on the iPhone or after the iPhone was in the docking station and I took it out of the docking station): "This accessory is not made to work with iPhone. Would you like to t
-
Mouse & Screen Jump around at various times
If I left my mouse stand still the mouse cursor will jump around. Also, the screen will automatically switch screens moving to the left or to the right to a new screen or sit there half way. It's happening while typing this message. Also the mouse pa
-
I run off of Mac os 10.4 and have been using my video iPod to view my To-do's for some time now. So today I activated my iPhone and while it displays my iCal wonderfully and lets me edit and add events, it doesn't display my To-do's anywhere I can se
-
8.1.7.0 functionality
May I ask the limited 8.1.7.0 functionality when I uses SQL Developper?
-
I'm fed up of being fobbed off
When we first got BT infinity it was great no problems no issues. After a few months speed dropped, connection dropped intermittently. We phoned they sent new hub, it was fine. Then we started with devices disconnecting. Phoned BT again and was told