Budget Consumption at the time of payment to vendor instead of booking expense

Hi,
as per my understanding In funds management budget is consumed at the time of booking invoice to vendor. that means that when expense id debited and vendor is credited budget against the commitment item entered or derived in expense line item will be consumed once its been saved. our requirement is to consume the budget at the time of payment to the vendor payment. let say that we have allocated a budget of 5000$ for traveling expense now when we actually book an invoice in the system for this expense system will hit the budget right away but let say i would like to hit this budget at the time when the payment is being made to the vendor. in this case i would like to map this commitment item with the outgoing bank account. the issue is we don't mention any const center in bank line so that system read the combination of cost center and cost element and derive the relevant fund fund center and commitment item. is there a way to handle this?
Regards,

You have to select update profile, which works with payment budget. Secondly, you have to define the settings for payment transfer in OF29 transaction. You should consult the following notes, in order to secure smooth payment transfer procedure:
For online update:
Note 1695556 - Main features of Customizing for onilne payment update
Note 882379 - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
In general:
Note 400924 - Recommendations and rules for the payment transfer in FM
Note 1466979 - FM Financial transactions to be used in FI line items

Similar Messages

  • Bank charges is not calculating at the time of payment to vendor by APP

    hi experts,
    In APP the paying company is paying to the vendor.Now they want to issue a DD (Demand Draft) to the vendor where a bank charges is involved.
    I have already customized the CHRGES/EXPENSES in Bank Determination Tab (transaction Code FBZP) to the corresponding Bank Subledger(outgoing) and also the Charge Indicator to the corressponding House Bank.
    the transaction key BSP is already assigned with the ledger(Bank Charges)
    I have already checked the Field status variant, it is ok
    But , that system is not calculating the bank charges as it is configured in the system at the time of payment through APP when a full MM invoice verification cycle is running
    Can anybody help me out?
    With regards,
    Sudipto Paul

    You have to select update profile, which works with payment budget. Secondly, you have to define the settings for payment transfer in OF29 transaction. You should consult the following notes, in order to secure smooth payment transfer procedure:
    For online update:
    Note 1695556 - Main features of Customizing for onilne payment update
    Note 882379 - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
    In general:
    Note 400924 - Recommendations and rules for the payment transfer in FM
    Note 1466979 - FM Financial transactions to be used in FI line items

  • Asset is getting capitalized at the time down payment to vendor for AssetPO

    Dear All,
    I am working on one scenario in which asset is getting capitalized at the time of down payment to vendor.
    I have created on Asset PO and i am doing downpayment to vendor against this Asset PO using F-48. Now it works fine and also this downpayment appear in that Asset PO also but i have only one problem when i have done with this downpayment, Asset is capitalized on down payment amount actually it should capitalized only when the actual goods received i.e at the time MIGO.
    Kindly let me know how to solve this issue. I dont want asset capitalized at the time of down payment.
    Thanks in advance.
    Marmik Shah

    This topic is already old but we had the same requirement. The asset should not be posted to during the down payment with F-48 but only during the good receipt.
    OSS note 310368 provides the solution for this. In short:
    - implement the corrections if needed
    - suppress the fields asset number/subnumber in the field group of the account allocated to the special G\L indicator "A - Down payment on current assets" (transaction OBC4)
    - change error message F5 378 to warning (transaction OBA5)
    After this, the down payment is only posting to the vendor and e.g. a bank account and the asset is only posted to during the goods receipt. Any additional AA customizing regarding account assignment for down payments is in this case also not needed.

  • At the time of Payment scheduling Bank Account List

    Hi All,
    As per my client requirement they want at the time of payment scheduling They have to know Bank Account status than they can do the payment scheduling. And they want process for multiple Vender and multiple House Bank.
    Payment by NEFT/RTGS/Check/Cash/DD other
    They want the system should have to identify which bank have sufficient amount than they make the payment by that process.
    Regards,
    Seema.
    Edited by: seemacg on Jun 27, 2011 7:48 AM

    Hi Vivek,
    Thanks for information But it is possible when we run payment scheduling process that time we see all Bank Account balance because my client want one list of Bank Balance as per this list they define the bank those run the payment for that outgoing payment.
    They want the assign one time the scheduled for Multipal Vendor and Multipal House Bank  and they make payment.
    What we do please help me.
    Regards,
    Seema
    Edited by: seemacg on Jun 28, 2011 1:50 PM

  • Additional Service tax line items at the time of payment

    Hi friends,
    Please look into the following requirement:
    At the time of vendor invoice, following entry is passed:
    Dr. Expenses                                             3000
    Dr. Service Tax (ST) not accrued Due             100
    Dr. Ed. Cess on ST Not accried Due                20
    Dr. SHE Cess on ST Not accrued Due             10
    Cr. Supplier                                          3130
    In the normal course, at the time of payment the following entries are generated:
    Dr. Suppliera/c.    3130
    Cr. Bank a/c.                 3130
    My requirement is:  at the time of payment, the service tax components debit entries should be nullified by credit entries and these three items should be debited to new accounts and the entries should be:
    =========================
    Dr. Suppliera/c.                            3130
    Dr. Service Tax (ST) 'accrued Due'  100
    Dr. Ed. Cess on ST 'accrued Due'      20
    Dr. SHE Cess on ST 'accrued Due'   10
    Cr. Service Tax (ST) Not accrued Due 100
    Cr. Ed. Cess on ST Not accried Due     20
    Cr. SHE Cess on ST Not accrued Due   10
    Cr. Bank a/c.                                      3130
    ==========================
    The purpose of the above is to carry forward only the tax applicable to the due account at the time of paying the vendor. 
    These additionally created three items as 'accrued due' should be taken for adjustment against the output tax liability at the time of making the payment of tax to the Government.
    I am not sure whether this is what being following as a general practice.
    If this is not so, I look forward your remarks on the procedure to be followed or updation of any SAP Notes.
    Full points will be awarded for eligible answers.
    Regards,

    Yes yar.  I know the concept of special GL.  But I fail to understand how that would be applied in the case. 
    My requirement is in another terms: 
    At the time of posting vendor invoice, the ST line items are created and is taken for input credit. 
    But I dont want that to be taken for credit at that time.  Only at the time of payment to the vendor, the same should be credited to my 'due' account.  So the line items generated at the time of invoice posting should be nullified with equal credit entries and additional credit entries for availing credit should be generated at the time of payment.  This process should happen in the case of output service tax also. 
    The processes should generate those additional nullifying and crediting 'due' accounts manually when you select the outstanding invoice and click on it for processing.
    Am I more clear to you now ?  Please offer your comments.  Is there any SAP Notes for coping the situation.
    Regards

  • WHT on Advance payment is getting reversed at the time of Payment

    Hi,
    WHT on advance payment is getting reversed at the time of payment.
    The configuration is as follows:
    1)  "No Central Invoice" Option is selected in WHT type for payment posting
    2) TDS base is manually entering at the time of Invoice after deducting the Advance amount.
    3) WHT codes are not entered (deleated at the time of Invoice posting)  at the time of Invoice entry.
    Could you please let me know what to do for not reversing the WHT on advance payment at the time of Payment of Invoie.
    Example: 
    1) Advance paid 5000    TDS deduted 113
    2) Invoice is 10,000, TDS is deducted only on 5000 (i.e. 113 Rs again) after deduting the advance payment
    3) Advance is adjusted against the invice using F-54.
    4) TDS on Rs.5000 advance payment is getting reversed at the time of F-53 payment of balance amount.
    Advance thanks for your help
    Regards
    Koteswara Rao Padarti

    Hi KRP,
    The alternative ways for avoiding reversal of TDS related to advance payment is as follows:
    1) select central inv prop radio button at the time of creating tax type for payment posting.
    2)Adv payment vide F-48
    3) Invioce posting vide FB60/F-43.In withholding tax screen update the base amount as net of advance.
    4) while making payment vide F-53 select the Special GL  indicator A for clearing the advance.
    5) While creating remittance challan vide J1INCERT select all the document number i.e. doc no pertaining to adv payment as well as inv posting.
    6) Update bank challan vide J1INBANK.
    7) Print withholding tax certificate vide J1INCERT.
    I do hope you will be able to overcome your problem.
    with best wishes
    Monoj

  • While running F110 mail trigger should happen at the time of payment Run

    Hi Experts,
    I have configured FBZP and automatic mail trigger for Payment Advice also.  Now while running F110 then at the time of Proposal Run the mail is getting triggered. But since its proposal it can be edited also. So I need the mail should trigger at the time of Payment Run. Plz suggest how to achieve this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Arabinda

    Check this note: 836169
    may be helpful with the config and setup, its a consulting note....

  • House Bank selection at the time of Payment run

    Hello All,
    At the time of automatic payment program, The user has to select the house bank for the payment irrespective of ranking order maintained in the FBZP. And I dont want to give the house bank in all the line item at the time of posting or reallocate at the time of payment run.
    Is there any option to maintain the house bank in a single place before the payment run, so that for that particular payment run picks the house bank.
    Hope the question is clear.
    Raja.A

    Hi,
    the user should use the "available amounts" in bank selection and put zero in the bank he doesn't want to use, and put an amount in the bank he wants tu use.
    The available amounts may be changed from the F110 transaction, environment menu, maintain config, bank determination.

  • FM - Budget check at the time of procurement and at the time of Issue

    Hi
    For a Material there is a budget for a procurement ( Check should happen at the time of procurement and a seperate budget for consumption ( Check should happen at the time of issue).How can I map this in FM- BCS.I am thinking of creating two commitmen items one for Procurement , to be derived thorugh matl grp at the time of PR / PO and  One commitment item for consumption to be derived through consumption GL . Does it work , any comments?
    Thanks in advance
    Chris

    Yes you are right , I have to make to sure stock budget doesn't get credited.
    If you remember in one of my other threads, i wanted to derive commitment item from Matl grp, it was for this purpose. I will derive commitment through matl group at the time of procurement / GR etc and assign a dummy commitment item to stock a/cs. Where as i will derive a consumption commiment item from consumption GLs.
    Thank you
    Chris

  • Budget Error at the time of Release of Purchase order

    Hi,
    We are using former budgeting and getting budget payment budget exceeding error at the time of releasing a carry forward PO.
    PO has been successfully carried forward to next year and we are not making any changes in the PO. While releasing the same via ME28, system is giving budget exceeding error.
    Screens shot is attached herewith for reference.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Mar,
    The root cause of the issue is incorrect updation of taxes value in EKPO table for that PO, which causes the system to consume less budget at the time of saving of PO.
    Now while releasing the PO, system is checking for whole tax amount and sufficient budget is not available in the budget address.
    Hope you able to connect the issue.....:P
    Regards
    Rohit Chopra

  • WBS budget reduction at the time of PO creation

    Hi,
    1. When a PO is created against a WBS element, at this point is there any budget check? If so is it against RELEASED budget or TOTAL BUDGET.
    2. If at the time of PO creation the budget check is against TOTAL, does the system check at the time of invoice posting against RELEASED?
    I have the following scenario in PRODUCTION.
    WBS  TOTAL budget - 200,000
    WBS RELEASED budget - 100,000
    System is allowing to post POs and INVOICES fro Rs.180,000 (more than RELEASED). WBS availability check is active.
    Any idea why system is allowing to post both PO and INVOICES more than released??
    Regards
    Prajith

    Hi,
    The budget is checked against the assigned values.
    The assigned value for projects is calculated from:
    1. Actual costs on the budget carrying WBS element
    2. Statistical actual costs on the budget carrying WBS element
    3. Actual costs from lower-level WBS elements, if these do not have any budget
    4. Statistical actual costs from lower-level WBS elements, if these do not have any budget
    5. Commitments on the budget carrying WBS element
    6. Commitments from lower-level WBS elements, if these do not have any budget.
    7. Maximum from plan and actual costs + commitments from assigned networks or orders
    To know more about the assigned values: Go to CJ30 enter in the budget distribution screen then Extras->Availability control>analysis.
    Also check the transaction group in tolerence limit in SPRO
    For more details please refer the following note: 178837.
    hope its useful.
    Reward points if useful.
    Thanks..

  • Budget check at the time of goods issue

    Friendds,
    can we do budget check ( with Funds Mgt ), at the time of goods issue ( mb21), if yes, pl share withme.
    regards

    Hi,
    MB21 is MM reservation. This kind of transaction has no impact on FM tables, but you can achieve this by activating a business function (see note 1321375).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Budget Exceeds at the time of Reverse the MIRO

    HI All,
    At the time of Reverse the MIRO system is hitting a WBS Budget exceed.  Here the actually thing is why the system is checking the budget at the time of
    Regards

    Hi,
    Please check the currency for the invoice value. if it is foreign currency then system may be calculating it for currect exchange rate maintained. Please check this.
    In your case availability check for the budget is active at all stages / transcation so system is checking for the budget availability.
    regards,

  • Budget consuming at the time of excise

    HI All,
    Recently i have encountered one Budget related error.  At the Time of J1IIIN system is consuming the Budget. Is it the reason of Cost Element Category 1?
    Here one more intresting things is, sytem is consume budget at the time of J1IEX also.  Is it system standard behaviour?
    Regards

    HI nkonnipati,
    I hope you were understand the problem.  If the cost object would not be available at the time of J1IEX & J1IIN.  without Cost Object how the system will consume the Budge?
    Pl see the below explanation:
    If i post through expenss through  F-02:
    Case 1:
    40 Expness A/C Dr .   TO 50 Bank Account.  Here i am not giving any Internal Order & WBS.  Is this case Budget will consume?
    Case 2:
    40 Expness A/C Dr .   TO 50 Bank Account.  Here i am giving any Internal Order & WBS.  Here Budget would consume.
    Here my doubt is how the budget would consume at 1st Case.
    Regards

  • TDS Problem at the time of Advance to Vendor

    Hi
    here is a proplem at the time of Vendors Advance payment thro f-48, aft complition of document when simulating the document ,it come Vendor-----Dr,Bank A/C--
    Cr, but TDS amount is not shown(At the time of its Invoicing Every things is ok,TDS is also Deducted ) and when it massage come like that
    Withholding tax amount exeeds total bank line item amounts
    Massage no 7Q320
    kindly look this matter
    Regards
    Akhil

    Hi,
    Please check the following settings.
    This error occures due to bank GL that we post during down payment. Go to FS00, put that GL & in "Create/bank/interest" tab tick on relevent to cash flow.
    Also check in Customizing that You have maintained the Withholding tax type for Payment Posting?
    First of all, apply forst option. May be your problem will be resolved.
    Pls assign points if found useful
    Regards,
    Jigar

Maybe you are looking for