Budget Funds check report

Dears,
I need to develop 1 report to find out before raising new Purchase requisition whether funds check limitation available or not.
GL natural account :: Budget value :: PO requisition made on account :: PO req status
e.g
Expense account :: allocated fund(1000) :: po req1 200, :: PO 1 approved
po req 2 400 :: PO2 submitted
cud any1 help me on the query pls.
thanks a lot n advance....

Dear Sandeep,
Thanks for ur reply. pls help me to understand Purchase requisition and po distributions has any link.at purchase requisition stage should i consider on encumberance value...pls advice...?? which tables wud help me to check the fund before requisition approval...thanks a lot n advance...

Similar Messages

Actual data is not populated in Budget Fund Check Results for Project Budge

Dear All,
Please help me with the following issue:
1) Create Project Budget integrated to GL Budget (Top Down Integration for encumbrance).
2) Enter Time Sheets through pre-approved batches (we are aware fund check will happen only for Requisition, PO & Supplier Invoices and not for other transactions).
3) Now Actual Cost is updated for the time sheet entered in point number (2) in Expenditure Inquiry & PSI.
4) But the same Actual Cost is not updated in Budget Fund Check Results window (hence funds available is not updated). Navagation: Projects implementation Super User Responsibility
Budget> History> Tools >View Fund Check Results
Please provide us solution why Actual Cost is not updated at Fund check Results window because of this there is a huge impact on funds available.

Hi,
Please check the below for more help
http://www.ncoaug.org/archives/ncoaug_20070613/presentations/2002-Aug/Projects_Koziski.ppt
Rgds
Raghu

PR funds check report

Dears,
I need to develop 1 report to find out before raising new Purchase requisition whether funds check limitation available or not.
GL natural account :: Budget value :: PO requisition made on account :: PO req status
e.g
Expense account :: allocated fund(1000) :: po req1 200, :: PO 1 approved
po req 2 400 :: PO2 submitted
cud any1 help me on the query pls.
thanks a lot n advance....

Dear Sandeep,
Thanks for ur reply. pls help me to understand Purchase requisition and po distributions has any link.at purchase requisition stage should i consider on encumberance value...pls advice...?? which tables wud help me to check the fund before requisition approval...thanks a lot n advance...

Fund Management Reporting

Dear FM master,
I need to extract out column for budget, actual and commitment amount for my recent PR reporting to get the available budget.
Have difficulties to find FM table name. I need to link from EBAN/EBKN to Fund Mgmt table thru PR printing report.
Currently we are in release SAP47.
Is there any Function module that I can use to expediate the processing time?
TQ so much.

Hi Anurag,
Please read mentioned link to know more about period based encumbrance
Example: Period-Based Encumbrance Tracking - Funds Management - SAP Library
You can control moth level budget's ,check mentioned link more details
Budget control period wise as well as Year wise
Regards
ManiKumar

Purchasing funds Check

I have set up encumbrance & budget but when I check funds or reserve encumbrance, the encumberance entries are happening but even when the funds are not available i get funds check pass with the result message as " This transaction does not reduce funds available"

Hi
I also need help with the issue expalined above.
Thanks
Stella

CANT FUNDS CHECK' HOLD

Has anyone see the CANT FUNDS CHECK hold reason in AP?
Scenario
Enter a mixed invoice
Run validation
Invoice gets put on CANT FUNDS CHECK hold
Hold cannot be removed
Sufficient Project and GL Budget exist
Hold cannot be removed. Does not happen wilth all invoices. Any ideas?

Pl do not post duplicate threads - CANT FUNDS CHECK - AP Invoice

Funds Check failed

Dear All...
Invoice is failing funds check at resource level ( F108) ..
the actual cost budget for that resource is 27400
the commitment is 28676.19
balance is -1276.19
so the solution is to increase the cost budget by the balance amount ????
please help...
thanx in advance

Hi
Normally if the commitment amount is higher than the budget, you should not go on and increase the budget. In reality you are expected to decrease the purchase requisition.
Based on the company procedures you might be allowed to increase the resource budget amount, while decreasing the budget of another resource, so the total budget at project level remain the same.
Dina

API for fund check in AP and PO

hi All,
I want to check the availability of fund while customizing invoice apporval AME. Is there any API to do the budgetery control check. Please advise.
Regards,
Ashok

As far as I know, there is no API for funds check. However, you can refer to
Budgetary Control And Budget Integration-Technical Overview [ID 835136.1].
It explains the main tables involved and the packages/procedures used in Oracle's fund check.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Staff Budget / Actual Variance report

Hi,
What is 'Staff Budget / Actual Variance report'.
Is there any Business Content Reports avaliable for this purpose.
Please provide me information on Which Data Target 9Technical Name) i can do this report.
Thanks

Hi,
This InfoCube contains all costs and quantities on WBS elements (plan and actual using delta extraction, commitment, budget, accruals) that were transferred from the source system(s).
You can also use this InfoCube to access your own fields. For more information, see Customer-Defined Fields.
For background information on the concept of InfoCubes, see InfoCubes in Controlling.
Higher-Level Objects
Queries
The following queries can access this InfoCube:
·         0WBS_C11_Q0001: WBS Element (Detail): Plan/Actual
·         0WBS_C11_Q0002: WBS Elements (List): Budget/Actual/Commitment
·         0WBS_C11_Q0003: WBS Elements (List): Overall Planning/Actual/Commitment
·         0WBS_C11_Q0301: PSM: WBS Element (Detail): Plan/Actual
·         0WBS_C11_Q0002: PSM: WBS Elements (List): Budget/Actual/Commitment
Notes on Query Definition
If you attempt to sum across different valuation views and currency types, your query results will be incorrect. Summing across different values of these characteristics does not provide useful information.
InfoSources
·         0CO_OM_WBS_1: WBS Elements: Costs
·         0CO_OM_WBS_2: WBS Elements: Budget
·         0CO_OM_WBS_3: WBS Elements: Overall Plan
·         0CO_OM_WBS_6: WBS Elements: Actual Costs Using Delta Extraction
Characteristics
InfoObject
Description
0WBS_ELEMT
PSP element
0COSTELMNT
Cost element
0CO_AREA
Controlling area
0CURTYPE
Currency type
0PIOBJSV
Partner object type
0PIOVALUE
Partner object
0METYPE
Key figure category
0VERSION
Version
0VTDETAIL
Details of value type
0VTYPE
Value type for reporting
0DB_CR_IND
Sender/receiver indicator
0VALUATION
Valuation view
0VTSTAT
Statistics indicator for value type
0FM_AREA
FM area
0FUND
Fund
0FUNC_AREA
Functional area
0GRANT_NBR
Grant
0PFUND
Partner fund
0PFUNC_AREA
Partner functional area
0PGRANT_NBR
Partner grant
Navigation Attributes
The following navigation attributes have been activated. This is a sample selection. You are free to activate additional attributes, or deactivate attributes to improve performance.
InfoObject
Description
0WBS_ELEMT__0CO_AREA
Controlling area
0WBS_ELEMT__0PROFIT_CTR
Profit center
Time Characteristics
InfoObject
Description
0FISCPER
Fiscal year/period
0FISCVARNT
Fiscal year variant
0FISCPER3
Posting period
0FISCYEAR
Fiscal year
·        The characteristics fiscal year (0FISCYEAR) and posting period (0FISCPER3) are filled by the fiscal year period field (0FISCPER) in the InfoSource.
·        The characteristics and the cost element are not filled for overall budgets or overall plan values. The posting period and the cost element characteristic are not filled for annual budgets or annual plan values. This provides values with the format 000.YYYY (where YYYY is the fiscal year), particularly for the 0FISCPER characteristic.
Key Figures
InfoObject
Description
0AMOUNT
Amount
0QUANTITY
Consumption quantity
Restricted Key Figures
The restricted key figures are divided into several groups.
The basic key figures cannot be used without restricting some of the characteristics. For this reason you should use only the supplied restricted key figures in queries you have defined yourself, or analyze the supplied restricted key figures and modify them to suit your requirements.
InfoObject
Restriction
Costs Group
Data for all restricted key figures of the group
Key figure category = 1000 (costs and associated quantities)
Valuation view = 0 (legal valuation)
Version = 0 (current variant)
Key figure = 0AMOUNT (amount)
0WBS_C11_RK0002 Actual costs
Sender/receiver = S (debit posting or receiver debit)
Value type = 10 (actual)
0WBS_C11_RK0001 Planned costs
Sender/receiver = S (debit posting or receiver debit)
Value type = 20 (plan)
0WBS_C11_RK0006 Settled costs
Sender/receiver = H (credit posting or sender debit)
Value type = 10 (actual)
0WBS_C11_RK0003 Commitments
Sender/receiver = S (debit posting or receiver debit)
Value type = 40 (commitment)
0WBS_C11_RK0004 Budget (per fiscal year)
Value type = 50 (budget)
0WBS_C11_RK0005 overall planning (per fiscal year)
Value type = 20 (plan)
Revenues Group
Data for all restricted key figures of the group
Sender/receiver = H (credit posting or sender debit)
Key figure category = 1001 (costs and associated quantities)
Valuation view = 0 (legal valuation)
Version = 0 (current variant)
Key figure = 0QUANTITY (quantity)
0WBS_C11_RK0008 Actual revenue
Value type = 10 (actual)
0WBS_C11_RK0007 Planned revenue
Value type = 20 (plan)
Quantities Group
Data for all restricted key figures of the group
Sender/receiver = S (debit posting or receiver debit)
Key figure category = 1000 (costs and associated quantities)
Valuation view = 0 (legal valuation)
Version = 0 (current variant)
Key figure = 0QUANTITY (quantity)
0WBS_C11_RK0021 Actual consumption quantity
Value type = 10 (actual)
0WBS_C11_RK0022 Plan consumption quantity
Value type = 20 (plan)
WIP Group
Data for all restricted key figures of the group
Sender/receiver = S (debit posting or receiver debit)
Key figure category = 1410 (inventory (WIP))
Valuation view = 0 (legal valuation), version = results analysis version
Value type = 80 (results analysis)
Key figure = 0AMOUNT (amount)
0WBS_C11_RK0011 WIP: Revenue in excess of billings
Detail for value type = 10
0WBS_C11_RK0009 WIP: Work in process
Detail for value type = 1, 2
0WBS_C11_RK0010 WIP: Cannot be activated
Detail for value type = 3
Results Group
Data for all restricted key figures of the group
Sender/receiver = S (debit posting or receiver debit)
Key figure category = 1400 (accrual calculation)
Valuation view = 0 (legal valuation)
Version = accrual version
Value type = 80 (results analysis)
Key figure = 0QUANTITY (quantity)
0WBS_C11_RK0018 Revenue affecting net income
Detail for value type = 12
0WBS_C11_RK0014 Cost of sales
Detail for value type = 3, 4
0WBS_C11_RK0015 Cost of sales (cannot be capitalized)
Detail for value type = 5
0WBS_C11_RK0017 Realized loss
Detail for value type = 11
0WBS_C11_RK0012 Reserves for imminent losses
Detail for value type = 1
0WBS_C11_RK0013 Reserves for imminent losses - inclusion cannot be capitalized
Detail for value type = 2
0WBS_C11_RK0016 Loss
Detail for value type = 10
Reserves Group
Data for all restricted key figures of the group
Sender/receiver = S (debit posting or receiver debit)
Key figure category = 1420 (reserves)
Valuation view = 0 (legal valuation), version = results analysis version
Value type = 80 (results analysis)
Key figure = 0AMOUNT (amount)
0WBS_C11_RK0019 Reserve: unrealized costs
Detail for value type = 1, 2
0WBS_C11_RK0020 Reserve: unrealized costs, not capitalized
Detail for value type = 3
Units
InfoObject
Description
0CURRENCY
Currency key
0UNIT
Unit of measure
Hareesh

AP R12 Invoice Fund check Error

Hello guys,
I have got AP invoice that failed validation due to error- " funds checking could not be performed".
However, there is no budgetary control setup on the Ledger and no budgets setup on the ledger either.
But mistakenly, Payable option for the Encumbrance tab: Use Requisition and Use PO" where checked.
This two options were later unchecked and saved.
But the error could not disappear after trying to revalidate the invoice again.
All subsequent and newly entered invoices are fine with validation, but just the failed initially ones.
Any idea will help.

Please see the following docs.
R12: APXINWKB: Validating an Invoice Gets 'Funds Checking Could Not Be Performed' Hold [ID 803663.1]
Information Center: Using Oracle Payables [ID 1417577.2]
11i: Encumbrance and Funds Inquiry - Setup and Usage [ID 389485.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

We want to stop Budget AVC checks for MIGO & MIRO in Live System

HI Everyone.
We are using Funds Management (BCS) and at the inital stage we are checking the budget at PR, PO, GR & Invoice level.
Now, due to the functional constraints we've decided to remove the Budget AVC checks for GR (MIGO) and IR (MIRO)
Note: At the movement we are not using any activity groups w.r.t tolerance groups, bcoz if we specify the activity groups for only PR & PO, system wont check the budget at GR & IR but, system will post the negative values (FMB_PT01)
So, as a work around, we've defined derivation steps at business transaction level (RMWE & RMRP) by assigning commitment item which is having financial transaction 40 & commitment item type 3, where system wont check the budget.
But, system is not performing the derivation based on this rule in PRD, where with the same config system able to work properly as we desired in DEV client and able to bypass the MIGO & MIRO.
Can anyone, give some suggestions or best way to achieve the said requirement of avoiding the AVC check @ MIGO & MIRO level.
Thanks in Advance.
Raja Sekhar

Dear Mar,
I've maintained the Pre-development parameters in PRD and it is working fine as per my Derivation rule.
Can you tell me is there is similar kind of parameter, for service entry sheet also for the same purpose.
i've tried by maintaining parameter FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in FM01X, due to which in ML81N system taking the fund center as per the derivation, but when i am creating PO for services, system is not able to derive the fund center,
where as previously, before maintaining the above parameter, system use to derive the fund center based on cost center, which is not working after this maintainance.
Any suggestions on this.
Thanks for your support
Raja Talluri

Budget Authorization Checking

Dear Expert,
I have to check authorization about who can change budget for each WBS in CJ30 (Ex : 1 person can see 3 WBS for change can not see all WBS ).
1. I have idea to check by User exits (Enhancement : CNEX0002 ) but it's not work becuase i need to replace 'Person Responsibilities' value for Authorize Role (c_prps_vnr) system check and my user didn't maintain 'Number of Person Responsibilities' for each WBS master.
2. I used Substitution for this case can replace 'Person Responsibilities' value but when I use CJ30 not break point my substitute.
How can i do for resolve this problem? Any one have some idea to share with me?
Thanks in Advance. "^.-"

Hi,
Your issue is clear now. Basically you have combination of two requirements ie authorisation with amount check. I can think of 2 solutions:
1. Create different roles as discussed earlier and some developement will be required for budget amount check. You will have to look out for user exit in CJ30.
2. You can use the Budget release functionality wherein authorisation for budget entry will be given to all but release authorisation will be given to seniors only.
I understand that 2nd solution doesnt take care of your requirement fully as still there may be wrong current budget in the reports but still released budget would be correct. But this option is easier to implement. I would lookd for some user exits in CJ30 and get back to you.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Regards
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 23, 2008 11:52 AM

Budget/Actual/Commitments Report in PM Order

Dear Experts,
I am using the scenario of PM and PS integration. In which i am creating a project with WBS elements. & each WBS is having some budget and is also released. I am using one of the WBS in PM order in additional data tab page. After that i am releasing the order and doing the time confirmation. In the cost tab of PM order the actual cost is coming . Now i am trying to see the report Budget/Actual/Commitments by clicking on Rep.Budget/Commit. button.
Here in a report no budget is appearing only actual cost is coming.
Kindly let me know why budget is not appearing in the report , even though the budget has been assigned to WBS which has been used in PM Order and released.
Regards
Amar

Hi,
Note that WBS element used here is for rolling up cost to WBS element from work order.When you define WBS element that will act as settlement receiver for work order.There is no other connection between WBS and work order to budget/actual report on cost tab of work order.Hence, you can see only costs related to order on order cost reports and no budget from WBS.
If you want to see budget/actual cost report on order then you need to activate budgeting functionality for work order object.This is done by assigning budget profile to order type which will act many times as internal order in FI area.Then you need to use budget functionality on order level by supplement/availability control functionality.Then only you can see budget/actual/committment cost report as it is relevant to order as an object.
So dont get confused with this budget cost report with WBS budget.
Reports on WBS/project objects are seen in respective PS cost reports.
regds,
atul

AP Checks Report RTF or PDF??

Hi all,
I just started working on the AP Checks report in XML Publisher. I was wondering whether I need to use the RTF type or PDF type template. I was told that the PDF type template is better for check printing, because it allows us print the data out in fixed position. Is that right?
Any thoughts???
Thanks!!

Hi,
I am struggling to complete the AP Cheque Printing report.
Could you please let me know the step which you followed and could you please send the rtf that you are using.
Followings are the steps I did.
1. Create rdf and register in APPS.
Executable is defined in Customization AP application
Concurrent Program is in Payables application.
2. Create Data Definition and Template in XML Publisher administrator in Payables.
3. Attached the Concurrent program in AP Format set up.
4. Make the Payment, The report is calling and showing completed normal but the output is not coming.
5. Then I run the XML report Publisher and pass the request id then the output is coming as PDF.
But the requirement is when we make the payment , The output should come and it will go to the printer for printing..
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pradipta

Financial Statement - FGI3 for fund balance reporting from FMGLFLEXT

Hi Guys,
We are on ECC 6.0 with PSM and new GL turned on. The issue is that my users want to see the same financial statement as they saw in classic GL with their R/3.
SAP has a fund balance report or otherwise the financial statements for public sector with its ISPS components like fund and grants from FMGLFLEXT, which is the totals table.
To arrive at the financial statements, we have a report group which can be run from FGI3 and it pulls values out of FMGLFLEXT and SAP's standard combination for slicing on the report feature are
1. account number
2. FS item/account description (the further click on this account name gives you account number)
3. Funds and
4. possible account assignments from FM like grants or business area depending on your active components.
Is there a standard display, wherein, it gives a FS Item/Acct number/account name like the standard reporting feature in classic GL. It makes it so easy to read the financial statements. Since they being a report painter/writer reports, we can tweek them to get the desired output but shouldnt it be the standard feature of SAP to provide that.
I was curious to know, if SAP delivers that reporting feature and i am not able to spot it or is it that we have to change it.
It will be very helpful, we are going live in a very short time.
Thanks

Hello
Business area balance sheet extracts are not legally or statutorily complete because there are certain GL account balances like, reserves, equity, some unsecured loans which are difficult to be assigned to a specific business area.
Ideally, business area analysis is restricted to profitablity and an overview of assets & liabilities specific to BA.
So your requirement is tough and even if you shift to PCA, these issues still arise.
Since they are internal to the client, better look for workaround solutions.
Reg
Suresh

Budget Funds check report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for