Change Bid response Status

Hi to all Gurus,
Currently I am using bapi_quotec_create to create bid responses in SRM 6.0. All went well, except that the status is set to Held. I also have the field document_incomplete set to 'X' in table bbp_pdhsd.
May I know how to set the status to bid submitted? Points will be awarded. Thank you!

Hi Mani and Disha,
Thanks for the help. Because I created the bid responses using BAPI_QUOTEC_CREATE, the GUID returned is in char format.
I converted the GUID to raw using GUID_CONVERT so that I can pass it as a parameters into BBP_PD_QUOT_SAVE. However this cause me a program termination. This is the steps i take: call bapi_quotec_create, call bbp_pd_quot_save and then bapi_transaction_commit.
I have yet to try bbp_pb_status_change because I suspect the status "Held" is a result of not inserting the bid invitation history version GUID into the field BI_VERSION_GUID field in table bbp_pdhsb.
Points have been awarded. Thank you again!

Similar Messages

Change status of PO created from Bid response

Hi,
Can anyone let me know - which BADI or IMG Setting can be used to change the PO status to customized user status while creating Purchase Order from Bid Response accepted from a vendor ?
Regards,
Rajeshree

Hi All,
I tried using the SPRO settings for creating status profile with all user defined statuses and then attached this status profile to the transaction type for BUS2201 (PO) but it does not work. PO always shows awaiting approval status.
Do we have to implement a BADI in this case ?? please suggest...something.
BR,
Rajeshree

Changing Student Header status in Student file

Hi,
I want to change the header status of student in student file wrt to the reason of cancellations assigned during de-registration. I have created student status and cancellation reasons. Assigned these to RW01 activity. This activity is assigned to call up point 041( create de-registration) but no results. What shall i do to change system status?
Regards
Vinod Kumar

Hi, i configured various status but getting this error on execution.
Which infotype and subtypes are used to store status?
Entry 9008 does not exist for Subtype; check your input
Message no. HRPIQ00ST_E108
Diagnosis
Entry 9008 does not exist for Subtype in table T777Z.
System Response
The program is terminated.
Procedure
Check your input value for Subtype. The value should exist in the value table.
Regards
Vinod

Response status has number of values different from request

Hi,
I'm getting the following message when I try to refresh a worksheet from a workbook.
"Response status has number of values different from request"
Has anyone encountered this message? what does this mean?
I'm using SmartView 11.1.2.1.103 on HFM 11.1.2.1.103 environment.
Thanks in advance,
Ram

Try removing external calculations (/$C$1) and see if the error message changes.

Unable to create Bid Response in SRM7.0

Hi,
I have created a RFX (Bid) and I have assigend multiple vendors as bidders.
I have also updated the Suppliers with Surrogate bidding checkbox.
Now I would like to enter bid responses for the bids. I could not find a link.
Please let me know what we are missing.
We are in SRM7.0 ECC 6.0. we are not using SUS at this moment.
Thanks

The step by step procedure is as follows:
1. Create an RFx
2. Enter all the mandatory fields.
3. Add bidders
4. Add items
5. Publish the RFx
Now check the status of the RFx ..It should be published( Not in awaiting approval. If it is waiting for approval then the respective person should accept it)
Once the RFx is published:
1. Bidder can use the link which they got to create a response or
2. The purchaser can create a response on behalf of the bidder, provided surrogate bidding is enabled for that particular bidder.
Bidder can create a response only if the start date has reached and submission deadline has not yet been reached.
If the RFx is public then any bidder can create a response for that by registering.

How do I set the response status code for a request in ADF?

For example:
I have a page accessible like page.jspx?id=$ID, in which $ID identifies an object stored in a database. The user navigates to page.jspx?id=abc. abc does not exist or has been deleted. I wish to set the response status code to 404 for the page request, like, for instance, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=abc does. How do I do this?
PS: Changing the status code for subsequent partial submits on the page if the object is deleted while the user is on the page (e.g. if the user attempts to delete an already deleted object through a "Delete" button on the page) may also be desirable, but would probably not fit in as well with the ADF lifecycle or be as useful.

Maybe I should be more specific about the current state of the code. It's something functionally similar in relevant portions to the following. For the purposes of this code, assume the ID maps only to a name, rather than a more complicated object:
page.jspx looks like:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"
     xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
     xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich"
     xmlns:trh="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/html" version="1.2">
     <jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
     <f:view>
          <af:document binding="#{pageInitializer.dummyComponent}" title="#{pageData.name != null ? pageData.name : 'Object Not Found'}">
               <af:outputText rendered="#{pageData.name != null}" value="#{pageData.name}" />
               <af:outputText rendered="#{pageData.name == null}" value="No object was found at this URL." />
          </af:document>
     </f:view>
</jsp:root>pageInitializer and pageData are pageFlow-scoped beans with the following code:
class PageInitializer {
     @Inject private PageData pageData;
     @Inject private NameDao nameDao;
     @PostConstruct
     void initialize() {
          String name = nameDao.getNameById(FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().getRequestParameterMap().get("id"));
          if (name != null)
               pageData.setName(name);
          else
               // TODO: Set status code 404
     public void setDummyComponent(UIComponent dummyComponent) {
     public UIComponent getDummyComponent() {
          return null;
public class PageData {
     private String name;
     public String getName() {
          return name;
     public void setName(String name) {
          this.name = name;
}The code initializes the data from the database through the initilaizer of a pageFlow-scoped bean with a dummy setter for the document because I read somewhere that that would work, and it seems to work, even though it seems hacky.
Ideally, the code would render the 404 where it currently says (// TODO: Set status code 404). I realize this may not even be possible given the current architecture, because part of the response body has already been rendered, and I believe, but cannot find a source to cite, that the status code and headers cannot be set after the body has started being rendered. Is there any architecture that would get me this page's functionality (even if it's two JSPXs on the backend (which might be ideal)) and be able to render a 404 for an inexistent object?
Edited by: 907794 on Feb 1, 2012 3:55 PM
Edited by: 907794 on Feb 1, 2012 3:58 PM

Firefox 3.6.3, windows 7 HP,flash player 10.1.53.64---unexpected http response-status code 13030--

windows 7 HP, Firefox 3.6.3,flash player 10.1.53.64--unexpected HTTP response-status code 13030- any idea on what to do?
== URL of affected sites ==
yahoo mail

Same problem here! Actually took me quite awhile to figure out what the hell was causing the slight screen flicker when going on Youtube, but I'm confirming this. With Hardware Acceleration enabled, Flash changes GPU Memory (VRAM) frequency and locks it so that it can't be changed until the video page is closed. Mine downshifts from 950 down to 500, which is quite of an achievment as for some reason this card with it's fancy schmancy GDDR5 memory isn't too keen on underclocking the VRAM..
Hardware:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2,4Ghz @ 3 Ghz
RAM: 4GB A-Data 800mhz
GPU: ATI Redeon HD 4870
GPU clock settings:
- GPU: 790 MHZ/ default 750 MHZ
- VRAM 950 MHZ/ default 900 MHZ
MB: MSI P35 Neo Combo
Software:
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Browser: Firefox 3.6.3 and it's speedy variant Pale Moon (http://www.palemoon.org)

OIM 9.1 DB Recon Changes Locked Account status in OIM back to Provisioned

Hi,
I have a scheduled task that runs the OIM DBAccessReconTask but am seeing some unexpected behavior. Here are the steps to produce the error:
1. Provision a DB account to a user in OIM (this creates an account in the target database and the account shows in the user's resource profile with a status of "Provisioned")
2. Disable the DB account in OIM from the User's Resource profile screen (this successfully disables the account in the database and changes the account status to "Disabled")
3. Run the DBAccessReconTask
4. After the DBAccessRecon task completes the status of the DB account in the database is still disabled but in OIM on the user's resource profile screen it is marked as "Provisioned"
I did not expect this to be changed to provisioned in OIM since it is disabled in the database. Has anyone seen similar issues when running the DBAccessReconTask or know a way to fix this?

Hi Suren,
Thanks for the reply. Originally I thought your solution would work but after analyzing it closer there is a more fundamental problem we are having with the DBReconTask. We only want the reconciliation to take place going from OIM to the database and not vice versa (i.e. changes to an account in OIM should be pushed to the database but not from the database to OIM). However, currently if a change is made in the database (a role is added, the profile is changed, etc...) and the DBReconTask is run then it will be updated in OIM. Do you know how this can be achieved? These are the properties we currently use when creating the task:
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put("Target System Login Recon - Resource Object name:", ro.getName());
props.put("Target System User Recon - Resource Object name:", ro.getName());
props.put("Trusted Source Recon - Resource Object name:", "Xellerate User");
props.put("Server", itResource.getName());
props.put("Record Size", "ALL");
props.put("isTrusted", "NO");
props.put("DBName", "nodata");
props.put("ExcludeSystemUsers", "nodata");
props.put("ReconcileLockedUser", "YES");
props.put("Login Name", "nodata");

Change the transaction status when creating a follow up activity

Hello All
We need to change the activity status if a follow up document is created from. E.g. If an activity is created type 001 then a follow-up activity type 003 as a follow up document from 001 the system automatically changes the activity status from open to in process. I need detailed steps regarding how to reach this
Regards
Jacopo

See if you can "exploit" CRM_COPY_BADI and function modules CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN to change the User status or CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN for System status.

Is it possible to change the user status of a TECO Order

Hello Folks
Is it possible to changes the user status of a TECO Order?
I have tried to change it using the FM 'STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN'. Its working fine for NON TECO Orders but not for TECO Orders.
On the other hand I was able to manually change the user status for a TECO Order in transaction IW32.
I need to change the user status from NFBK to FBK.
Please provide some inputs for the same.
Thanks n Regards
Ramesh

The simple way is via the Internationalization settings via ARD or RDP or Screen Sharing, either via System Preferences or (if enabled) via the menu bar. If you're looking for a lower-level approach, there's not AFAIK a direct command for this. As for one possible approach, might [threadID=2106201|http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2106201] help?

Exit or Badi for controlling the change of user status in notification

Hi,
I want to check the current user status of notification while saving the notificaton. If the current user status satisifies particular situation, then the notification should be save else not.
Is there any user exit or Badi which can be used to control the change of user status in notification.
Thanks
SUMIT

Hi Pushpa,
Thanks for the reply.
the problem over here is that the BADi IQS0_STATUS_MAINTAIN only allows to disable the user status.
the other function module STATUS_READ only fetches the data from JEST.
whereas my problem is that i want to check on the changed status on the screen(which is not saved also).
Appreciate your reply on the same.
Thanks
SUMIT

Possible to Change the Order Status

Hai
When i am booking the sales order the status is showing the Booked is it possible to change the Booked status according to the customer requirement ....
thanks in advance
M.Meenashi Sundaram

Hai its possible to change the order status from the
setup>quick codes>order management>
type --flow status
we can able to change it
thanks
M.Meenashi Sundaram

How to change Work order status ?

Hi,
I am using an ABAP program to change the user status of a work order to "CLOP" , This is like IW32 , Here Which function module I can use to do this ?
Thank you for your help.
Thanks

Hi,
You can use the FM 'STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN' for updating the user status. and 'STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN for updating the system status.
Hope this solves your problem.
Regards,
Hari

TO change the user status in the PM order

Hi,
My requirement is that a techician is assiged to do the work using MRS and based on that user status is update in the PM when the save button is clicked on the MRS board.
Now according to my requirement if anybody click on the save button and the technician is assigned to do the operation is done through MRS than the User status in the PM order should get changed.
As a part of standard functionality the user status is not updated.
A new user status is created in the trasaction BS02.
Can anybody please let us know how to achieve this functionality
Thanks
Mohit

We had a similar requirement and this is what we did :
1) Set up a task as a reciever for the WORKORDER SAVE event.
2) In this task called a method of a business object.
3) In the method called STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN to change the user status.

How to change the IO status to CLOSE after it has been settled through ko8g

hi ,
I have the following scenario : An internal order is assigned to a PO and after setllement of such an order i need to CLOSE the order .
The PO has a GR done (no IR) . Currently Internal Order is in the status : TECO [technically complete] and setlement has ben doneusing Actual Settlemnet Run using KO8G.
Now i need to change the IO status to [ CLOSE ] : it is gving an error in KO02 : Balance is not zero .
How to change the Internal Order status to CLOSE or rather how to make teh balance in that Order toZero?
Is it reqd to process some GR's for teh same PO ?
Thansk
Trina

Hi,
Check the order balance in Ko02
Menu --> Extras --> Order Balance if balance exist it means that the order has not completely settled.
Regards,
Raj

Change Bid response Status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for