Check Run Issue

Hi Guru's,
HI Guru's,
I have a an issue with the check run. Created a check run yesterday and went through all the steps...
- Parameters have been entered
- Payment proposal created
- Payment run has been carried out
- Posting orders 77, generated, 77 completed.
*- Printing Data and log have been deleted *
I can not remember what I click on and it caused this.
Please can someone help and tell me know how can I either re-run this check run I mean the physical checks or how can I go about this and delete this run and re-run from Scratch.
Best Regards,
Yasmeen

You could try going to tcode SE38 and then execute RFFOUS_C program from there.
Select your check variant,  enter the same program run date and ID that produced your 77 checks.
Look over your print controls to make sure hte correct printer is populated.
Scroll down to the very bottom of the screen and check "Void and reprint checks from payment run already printed."
Enter the Check Numbers that was produced before.
Enter a Void Reason Code.
Hope that helps.
Cindy

Similar Messages

  • AP - F110 - SAPFPAYM - Adobe Checks - Printing Issue

    We have ECC 6.0, and we recently started using Payment medium workbench to print adobe check forms.  All configuration and programming is done, except that we encounter an issue once in a while.
    Using F110, we will complete a proposal, review it and then execute the payment medium run.  Out of 60 or so check runs, we will have a batch that does not print the last few checks out.
    For example, in one instance, out of 100-200 checks, the last 4-6 did not print.  All tables (PAYR, etc.) and vendor were updated with a payment document and check number, and the spool does show an adobe image available for those particular items.
    The most recent occurrence involved 587 checks, where the last 54 did not print.  They are visible on the spool. 
    The logs of the payment run do not show any error messages or warnings.  We verified with our Basis team that there are no messages or logs associated with the actual printers, and yet, they just do not print!
    I have searched notes, forums and boards trying to find anyone with a similar issue but no luck thus far.
    I have created the issue in Qas as well, by using the same steps to create 588 checks via F110, but only 27 print out?  I tried the "Reprint" option on the F110 screen, and the same 27 checks print out.  (Its the first 27 of the spool that print each time.) 
    Again, the spool shows all 588 checks with images and all data/tables are updated appropriately.
    In OBPM4, we have the box for "Payment Document Validation" checked, and the correct printers assigned.
    Does anyone have any suggestions on what might trigger this? 
    Where else should we be looking to find some type of status or error message?
    Would it be helpful to run through the process with some type of trace running in the background?

    Thank you for your response.
    I wondered about a printer memory issue as well...however, I am not sure how much space an adobe check might take up versus the SapScript check form we used before. 
    Any suggestions on how to go about verifying this theory?  (Basis should monitor from their side when I start the print program?)  (Is there a report or status I can physically check or create from the printer itself?)

  • Check run failing

    A regular check run is failing at the formatting phase, even if its just one single invoice. Now, it works fine in the UAT instance, but fails on development or testing instances which are clones of each other.
    Could this be a setup configuration issue? Please advice.
    Exception error: ora-01403: no data found in package iby_disburse_ui_api_pub_pkg procedure iby_disburse_ui_api_pub_pkg.perform_check_print

    981362 wrote:
    A regular check run is failing at the formatting phase, even if its just one single invoice. Now, it works fine in the UAT instance, but fails on development or testing instances which are clones of each other.
    Could this be a setup configuration issue? Please advice.
    Exception error: ora-01403: no data found in package iby_disburse_ui_api_pub_pkg procedure iby_disburse_ui_api_pub_pkg.perform_check_printPlease do not post duplicates -- Check run failing

  • Availability check run requirement in the Sales order Save user Exit.

    Hi Gurus,
    As per the requirment we are using a user exit SAVE SALE ORDER PREPARE for BOM purpose to reconfirm the confirmation qty.
    Now we need to add one more logic in the same user exit, which will run the availabilty check run for each of the line items of the BOM and consider latest confirmation qty from it. So my concern is it possible that we can call the availabilty check run event with in the user exit SAVE SALE ORDER PREPARE or this not advisable?
    Please let me know..
      Regards,
      Babs

    HI Venkat,
    Thanks for your reply.Yes you are right availability check runs automatically at sub item level.
    But please note the customer requirment iteself is is little different from std BOM configuration.
    Currently the availabilty check is activated both at header and sub item level. They are maintaining the stock for header and sub item level.Also the these sub items are some time being sold as invidual materials. hence there exist a mismatch in the stock value between header and sub items.
    when a sales order is created both header and sub items will have confirmation with different value between each and the same mismatched values are being passed in to delivery. But the deliveries can not be processed for PGI because of the mismatched confirmation qty between header and item level.
    I guess now you the rrequirment.
    So we are using the SAVE SALE ORDER exit which will re check the confirmed qty between header and item and takes lowest confirmed qty and change the confirmed quantities from all the line items to lowest one, so that confirmation qty among all the line items are same. This is the first logic we are planning.
    Further there is one more additional process BOP need to be run for this header and sub items, which will change the confirmed qty based on the latest stock for individual line item. even in this case also the user exit SAVE Sale order is being called but we need to run the availability check run additionally because of which our requirment will be taken care.
    Regards,
    Babs

  • Vendor's check run clearind date

    hi all,
    this question is regarding clearing date of vendor's check run.
    They found out that one vendor from today's check run had a clearing date of 10/23/07 instead of 10/16/07. I checked and all the other payments from today's run had a 10/16/07 clearing date. My understanding is that becoz there was one invoice that was inadvetently posted with a 10/18 date, somehow it caused the payment run to pick up that date. Please advise.
    thanks.

    When clearing, the <b>last posting date of all the documents involved</b> in clearing is set as the clearing date.
    A rental invoice for December is entered on 11/28/1997 and the posting date is set to 12/01/1997. The rent is paid on 11/30/1997 and is also posted under this date. 12/01/1997 is then set as the clearing date, in other words the posting date of the invoice.

  • F110:  What is best method in voiding an EFT payment after check run?

    What is the best method in voiding or reversing an EFT payment after a check run (F110)?
    Thanks!

    have you figureed it out?
    if I didn't remember wrong, we first find the clearing document number in proposal log, and used FBRA to reset the clearing items, then reverse the document
    I am also interested in setting a dummy check number for EFT, anyone can throw some ideas here?
    thanks
    Keqin

  • Void a printed check run

    Please tell me what transaction code to use so I can void an entire printed Accounts Payable Check Run.
    Points will be awarded .
    Thanks!
    Kathy

    Thats the reason I suggetsed to use FCH9. There is no transcation code that exists for deletion of range of checks.
    In future if you encounter the same, then I suggest you to use LSMW to delete without going one by one. This as a work around you can use.
    FCH3 is not for your requiremnt. This is used when in the cheque lot if you have some unused checks which were torn or damaged then you use this tcode.
    By using FCHD you have deleted the check information for the payment run but the vendor or customer acount line items were cleared.
    Try FCH7

  • Check Run

    HI Guru's.
    Can some please tell me how I can get a list of checks by vendor, check number and amount for each check run? I tried running the check register by date but it gives me all the checks that were run for that date. I need it broken down by check run and we have had multiple check runs on some days.
    I tried running table REGUP - but that seems to give me some duplicate entries and it's not giving me all the runs. Some of the runs use the same identification id but on different days? It that a problem?
    Best Regards,
    Yasmeen

    I ran the PAYR table and got all the infomation. Thanks !
    Best Regards,
    Yasmeen

  • Check run does not create check register

    Hi,
    X report that is expected to be generated as a result of the check run being performed is the "Payment Summary" report.  Currently, this is not automatically printing.   To print same, the command "SP01" must be accessed, subsequent to the check run being performed. 
    And, also, as before, with the check registers printed from this command, the printing has been on only 1 side of the paper.
    In the variant, "print payment summary" is checked and "print immediatly" is also checked.
    Can anyone help me in this
    thanks

    Hi,
    Please check if correct SAP configured Printer name is given in the variant.
    Regards
    Anuradha

  • How do I delete/cancel  a check run proposal?

    How do I delete/cancel  a check run proposal?
    Points will be awarded.
    Thanks.
    Kathy

    Hi
    Go to F110, Edit-Proposa-Delete.
    Assign points if useful
    ~Rajesh

  • AP  invoice is not offsetting in the AP system when we perform a check run

    Hi Everyone,
    The invoice is not offsetting in the AP system when we perform a check run. They are remaining as outstanding in AP. Can you please tell us why? There are several of these in the system and I need them cleared out.
    Plz help me as early as possible.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    The status is not changing to "Paid". In this case Iam trying to apply a Credit memo(dated on 01-dec-09 & GL date 15-dec-09),the invoice date was 01-jul-2007,the Invoice and Credit memo transaction amount was 500 each.
    Invoice amount = 500 USD
    Credit memo = <500> USD
    The transactions should knock off.
    Pls Suggest me the solution.
    Thanks for your early response.

  • Check run in F110

    Hello Friends,
    A check run was done using F110 which worked fine.  When the checks were printing the paper jamed and in the middle of the run.  So half of the checks were printed fine.  How do I void the bad checks and reprint what was left using the same check numbers.  The rest of the batch was printed on white paper not the checks so I would like to use those checks instead of wasting them.  Please guide me on how I can fix this problem.   Thank you inadvance for your help.
    Monika

    Hi Monika,
    Please check your vendor Accounts it s cleared? its clear
    you go to T code FCHN  here available Doc No and  Check number also. based on document no and check no you can print manually remind checks T code FBZ5
    Regards,
    K.Satish

  • F110 Payment run issue

    Hi,
    We have created a payment run 1a  for a range o vendors  1 - 200  scheduled the payment run, vendor no 10 was included. Then 10 mins later scheduled another payment run for vendor number 10 only the payment run was scheduled. Now the issue is for both payment runs the backgorund jobs are still running after 4 hours!
    In FBL1n for the vendor 10 invoices have been cleared by both payment runs, which is ok.  In SM50 both background jobs I can see they are stuck in program "CL_BCS_EMAIL_ADDRESS==========CP"  this is the part of the BTC used to determine the email address of the vendor.
    Has anyone come across this issue before?
    thanks
    Joe

    Hi,
    yes, though couldn't figure out the reason, however if you check SP02 in the spool area you will be able to view all the advices.
    best regds
    Subha

  • DW CS3 Check Spelling Issue

    Back ground: I have a long IT career but have never really done any web dev before.  This is my first real stab at building a website so this may be a 101 coding error but I had a heck of a time figuring it out so I thought I'd share incase another newbie had a similar issue.
    After creating 1,164+ pages for my website, which has not yet been uploaded, I was doing a round of pre-upload spelling, code validations and link checks but could not get check spelling to work, no matter what I did it just wouldn’t highlight on the text dropdown menu nor could I use the keyboard short cut to initiate it. The pages were saved as .htm which is functionally the same as .html. I tried saving a test page as .html but is made no difference.
    All other fesatures worked and the code was recognised, previewing in a browser was fine, no problems there but I still couldn't check spelling in DW CS3.
    I knew it would be something stupid on my part… well I was right.  This must have happened when setting up the first page for the site, and was experimenting until I got it to look right and feel that way I wanted, I saved it and have used it at the ‘authoritative source’ or ‘template’ for all pages created.  First I created the template from it I created a template for each of the major sections of the site.  From them I have created all 1,164+ pages to date...
    I’ve sent this problem to every webhead that I know … I’ve even took it to work and had a couple guys there look at it.  No one had any idea, I think it’s because it was so simple everyone had looked right past it. I finally did a bit-by-bit comparison with another test site that spl chk worked on and even then I missed it because I was ignoring the automatically generated stuff up at the top.
    At the very top of the code:
    <!DOCTYPE htmPUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
    It is supposed to be:
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
    <html lang="en">
    At the bottom of the code:
    </htm>
    It is supposed to be:
    </html>
    Even though you can save this page as a ‘.htm’ file, the HTML notations have to be included.   Take them out and guess what:  ‘check spelling’ disappears. Why spelling does that but everything else still works… who knows, but it does!
    I’ve already made the correction to all pages.  Now I can forgo checking all 1,164 pages by hand (or cut-n-past into word) and now I can get the spelling, validation and link checks done so I can do the initial upload for this site.
    (I really wish you could check all "text" spelling for the site and spelling corrections as you type were offered... I did put in a request)
    So WOOO HOO!

    I'm not sure about what you mean but i do know that if you
    run the installation from your hard drive you don't need a disk or
    you could get the CS4 trial from Adobe.com and install with the key
    that came with CS4.

  • Project Based MRP run issue

    Hi Friends,
    There is one issue reg. Project Based MRP Run as below :
    We are running MRP through MD51 (Project based MRP run). For this we are assigning FG material code under respective WBS Element which generates Network reservation with movement type 281Q  which is base of MRP run in MD51. After MRP run we get planned order generation and then convert it to Production order and execute Production Order to receive Project Stock after GR.
    After receiving Project stock and then selling it through Post Goods Issue through SD cycle, project stock is consumed but network reservation is not getting closed which results in again generation of planned order if MRP is run again. 
    I need your valuable inputs if we are missing any configuration setting which can set Final issue indicator in reservation while Posting Goods Issue (PGI) in SD because FI indicator checking will only ensure reservation doesnu2019t take part in planning again.
    Your earliest reply will be highly appreaciated.
    Regards,
    Tejas

    Hi Vivek,
    Thanks for your reply. Actually my issue has got resolved the way suggested by Mario Adler.
    Hi Mario,
    Thanks for your solution. PGI through Project is working fine for me.
    Hi Krishna,
    Follow the procedure as suggested by Mario which will resolve your issue.
    Once again thank you all for spending your precious time to respond my query.
    Regards,
    Tejas

Maybe you are looking for