Cisco Ceasing Development Of Load-Balancer Products
Has anybody heard of Cisco's ceasing on developing the ACEs past ACE30?
Thanks.
All-
At this current point in time, the ACE30 and ACE4710 will continue to be developed through A5(3.X) code as part of the planned lifecycle of those products. Any of the other future products including vACE, RISE, Nexus based Modules, appliances, etc. currently have no ETA, nor has any lifecycle ever been defined as they are not released products. There is also no official Cisco response at this point in time to the rumors of cancellation, holds, etc. despite the hinting of certain articles to "confirmed by Cisco resources" based comments.
Your best avenue for information is to talk with your local Cisco sales representative or account manager. They may have more specific information pertaining to questions at a per-product/per-scenario level. As well, they will have the ability to help you plan your future deployments and designs queries accordingly.
Regards,
Chris Higgins
Cisco ANS Escalation Team
Similar Messages
-
Cisco CSS 11503 Arrowpoint/Load Balance question
I am troubleshooting an issue with my 11503. I am running version 07.40.0.04. I have it configured as follows:
content upcadtoa-rule
add service cadtoa-wls1-e0
add service cadtoa-wls1-e1
add service cadtoa-wls2-e0
add service cadtoa-wls2-e1
add service cadtoa-wls3-e0
add service cadtoa-wls3-e1
add service cadtoa-wls4-e0
add service cadtoa-wls4-e1
add service cadtoa-wls5-e0
add service cadtoa-wls5-e1
add service cadtoa-wls6-e0
add service cadtoa-wls6-e1
arrowpoint-cookie expiration 00:00:15:00
protocol tcp
port 8001
advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
redundant-index 2
vip address 172.30.194.195 range 2
arrowpoint-cookie name TOA
active
However, the load-balancing across the servers does not seem to be doing much balancing. One of those servers is getting hit with 5 times as much traffic as another and another server is lucky to get a connection at all. With the cookie expiration set, one would think that this would all balance out over time.
I just came across this information from Cisco and I am wondering if it is relevant:
If you configure a balance or advanced-balance method on a content rule that requires the TCP protocol for Layer 5 (L5) spoofing, you should configure a default URL string, such as url "/*". The addition of the URL string forces the content rule to become an L5 rule and ensures L5 load balancing or stickiness. If you do not configure a default URL string, unexpected results can occur.
In the following configuration example, if you configure a Layer 3 (L3) content rule with an L5 balance method, the CSS performs L5 load balancing, but will reject UDP packets.
content testing
vip address 192.168.128.131
add service s1
balance url
active
The balance url method is an L5 load-balancing method in which the CSS must spoof the connection and examine the HTTP GET content request to perform load balancing. The CSS rejects the UDP packet sent to this rule because a UDP connection cannot be L5. Though the CSS allows this rule configuration, its expected behavior would be more clear if you promote the rule to L5 by configuring the url "/*" command.
In the next example, if you configure an L3 content rule with an L5 advanced-balance method, L5 stickiness will not work as expected.
content testing
vip address 192.168.128.131
add service s1
advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
active
The advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie method causes the CSS to spoof the connection, however, the CSS still marks it as an L3 rule. Thus, the CSS does not insert the generated cookie and the rule defaults to L3 stickiness (sticky-srcip). You must configure a URL like url "/*" to promote this rule to L5, ensuring that L5 stickiness works as expected.
Thanks in advance for any help you can give. The thing is not down, it is just balancing strangely causing application performance issues.
JamesHey James,
You will need to suspend the content rule in order to add the url statement. This will cause a quick downtime until the content rule is activated again. I have shown below the commands to add the statement. Perhaps you can create your commands in a Notepad file, then paste them all in so they execute quickly to minimize your downtime:
content MY-SITE
vip address 10.201.130.140
port 80
protocol tcp
add service MY-SERVER
active
CSS11503# config t
CSS11503(config)# owner TEST
CSS11503(config-owner[TEST])# content MY-SITE
CSS11503(config-owner-content[TEST-MY-SITE])# url "/*"
%% Attribute may not be modified on active rule
CSS11503(config-owner-content[TEST-MY-SITE])# suspend
CSS11503(config-owner-content[TEST-MY-SITE])# url "/*"
CSS11503(config-owner-content[TEST-MY-SITE])# active
CSS11503(config-owner-content[TEST-MY-SITE])# exit
CSS11503(config-owner[TEST])# exit
CSS11503(config)# exit
CSS11503# show run
content MY-SITE
vip address 10.201.130.140
add service MY-SERVER
port 80
protocol tcp
url "/*" <--------
active
Hope this helps,
Sean -
Cisco 1921 Dual ADSL Load Balancing/Failover?
Hello,
We have purchased a Cisco 1921 with twin ADSL after advice from a Cisco sales rep. However I am having trouble working out the load balancing/fail over config for the device.
I would like traffic to balance over both ADSL lines and if one goes down not to interrupt connectivity.
I had a look at ppp multilink but I am unsure our ISP (BT) support this?
This is my current config which I think only one ADSL line is being used. Some input would be appreciated
Robbie
! Last configuration change at 13:18:34 UTC Tue Mar 29 2011
version 15.0
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname xxxxxx
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no logging buffered
enable secret 5 xxxxx
enable password xxxx
no aaa new-model
no ipv6 cef
ip source-route
ip cef
ip name-server 194.74.65.68
ip name-server 194.72.0.114
multilink bundle-name authenticated
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-xxxxxx
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-xxxxx0
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-xxxxx!
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-xxxxxx
certificate self-signed 02 nvram:IOS-Self-Sig#4.cer
license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 xxxxx
username admin privilege 15 secret 5 xxxxxxxxxx/
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description lan$ETH-LAN$
ip address 10.0.8.1 255.255.248.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface ATM0/0/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
no atm ilmi-keepalive
dsl operating-mode adsl2
interface ATM0/0/0.1 point-to-point
description $ES_WAN$$FW_OUTSIDE$
ip flow ingress
pvc 0/38
encapsulation aal5mux ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 1
interface ATM0/1/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
no atm ilmi-keepalive
dsl operating-mode adsl2
interface ATM0/1/0.1 point-to-point
description $ES_WAN$$FW_OUTSIDE$
ip flow ingress
pvc 0/38
encapsulation aal5mux ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 1
interface Dialer0
mtu 1483
ip address negotiated
ip access-group spalding in
ip access-group spalding out
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
ppp authentication chap callin
ppp chap hostname xxxxx
ppp chap password 0 xxxxx
ppp multilink
ppp multilink links minimum 2
ppp multilink fragment disable
ppp timeout multilink link add 2
no cdp enable
interface Dialer1
mtu 1483
ip address negotiated
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
ppp authentication chap callin
ppp chap hostname xxxxx
ppp chap password 0 xxxxx
ppp link reorders
ppp multilink
ppp multilink links minimum 2
ppp multilink fragment disable
ppp timeout multilink link add 2
no cdp enable
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.15.201 3389 interface Dialer0 3389
ip nat outside source static tcp 195.194.75.218 3389 10.0.15.200 3389 extendable
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
access-list 1 remark INSIDE_IF=GigabitEthernet0/0
access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.254.255.255
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
control-plane
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
privilege level 15
login local
transport input telnet ssh
line vty 5 15
privilege level 15
login local
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
endHi,
Can anyone help me with this config? not very reliable.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 17349 bytes
! Last configuration change at 06:08:06 UTC Sun Apr 5 2015 by Shawn
version 15.4
no service pad
service tcp-keepalives-in
service tcp-keepalives-out
service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezone
service timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezone
service password-encryption
service sequence-numbers
hostname Router
boot-start-marker
boot system flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.154-3.M2.bin
boot-end-marker
security authentication failure rate 3 log
security passwords min-length 6
logging buffered 51200
logging console critical
enable secret 5 $1$sNeA$GB6.SMrcsxPf51tK2Eo9Z.
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login local_authen local
aaa authorization exec local_author local
aaa session-id common
no ip source-route
ip port-map user-protocol--8 port udp 3392
ip port-map user-protocol--9 port tcp 3397
ip port-map user-protocol--2 port udp 3391
ip port-map user-protocol--3 port tcp 14000
ip port-map user-protocol--1 port tcp 3391
ip port-map user-protocol--6 port udp 3394
ip port-map user-protocol--7 port tcp 3392
ip port-map user-protocol--4 port udp 14100
ip port-map user-protocol--5 port tcp 3394
ip port-map user-protocol--10 port udp 3397
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.49
ip dhcp pool DHCP_POOL1
import all
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
dns-server 139.130.4.4 203.50.2.71
default-router 192.168.1.1
lease infinite
ip dhcp pool ccp-pool1
import all
network 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
dns-server 139.130.4.4 203.50.2.71
default-router 192.168.10.1
lease infinite
no ip bootp server
ip host SHAWN-PC 192.168.1.10
ip host DIAG 192.168.1.5
ip host MSERV 192.168.1.13
ip name-server 139.130.4.4
ip name-server 203.50.2.71
ip cef
ip cef load-sharing algorithm include-ports source destination
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
cts logging verbose
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1982477479
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1982477479
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1982477479
license udi pid
license boot module c2900 technology-package securityk9
license boot module c2900 technology-package datak9
redundancy
controller VDSL 0/0/0
operating mode adsl2+
controller VDSL 0/1/0
operating mode adsl2+
no cdp run
track timer interface 5
track 1 interface Dialer0 ip routing
delay down 15 up 10
track 2 interface Dialer1 ip routing
delay down 15 up 10
ip tcp synwait-time 10
ip ssh time-out 60
ip ssh authentication-retries 2
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--7-1
match access-group 104
match protocol user-protocol--7
match access-group 102
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--4-2
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--4
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--6-1
match access-group 103
match protocol user-protocol--6
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--5-1
match access-group 103
match protocol user-protocol--5
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--4-1
match access-group 102
match protocol user-protocol--4
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--7-2
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--7
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--3-1
match access-group 102
match protocol user-protocol--3
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--2-1
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--2
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--1-2
match access-group 102
match protocol user-protocol--1
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--1-1
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--1
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--2-2
match access-group 102
match protocol user-protocol--2
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--3-2
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--3
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--8-2
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--8
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--9-2
match access-group 104
match protocol user-protocol--9
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-skinny-inspect
match protocol skinny
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--9-1
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--9
match access-group 104
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--8-1
match access-group 104
match protocol user-protocol--8
match access-group 102
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-h323nxg-inspect
match protocol h323-nxg
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-cls-icmp-access
match protocol icmp
match protocol tcp
match protocol udp
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--10-2
match access-group 104
match protocol user-protocol--10
class-map type inspect match-all sdm-nat-user-protocol--10-1
match access-group 101
match protocol user-protocol--10
match access-group 104
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-h225ras-inspect
match protocol h225ras
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-h323annexe-inspect
match protocol h323-annexe
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-cls-insp-traffic
match protocol pptp
match protocol dns
match protocol ftp
match protocol https
match protocol icmp
match protocol imap
match protocol pop3
match protocol netshow
match protocol shell
match protocol realmedia
match protocol rtsp
match protocol smtp
match protocol sql-net
match protocol streamworks
match protocol tftp
match protocol vdolive
match protocol tcp
match protocol udp
class-map type inspect match-all SDM_GRE
match access-group name SDM_GRE
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-h323-inspect
match protocol h323
class-map type inspect match-all ccp-invalid-src
match access-group 100
class-map type inspect match-any ccp-sip-inspect
match protocol sip
class-map type inspect match-all ccp-protocol-http
match protocol http
class-map type inspect match-any CCP_PPTP
match class-map SDM_GRE
class-map type inspect match-all ccp-insp-traffic
match class-map ccp-cls-insp-traffic
class-map type inspect match-all ccp-icmp-access
match class-map ccp-cls-icmp-access
policy-map type inspect ccp-inspect
class type inspect ccp-invalid-src
drop log
class type inspect ccp-protocol-http
inspect
class type inspect ccp-insp-traffic
inspect
class type inspect ccp-sip-inspect
inspect
class type inspect ccp-h323-inspect
inspect
class type inspect ccp-h323annexe-inspect
inspect
class type inspect ccp-h225ras-inspect
inspect
class type inspect ccp-h323nxg-inspect
inspect
class type inspect ccp-skinny-inspect
inspect
class class-default
drop
policy-map type inspect sdm-pol-NATOutsideToInside-1
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--1-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--2-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--3-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--4-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--5-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--6-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--7-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--8-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--9-1
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--10-1
inspect
class type inspect CCP_PPTP
pass
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--7-2
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--8-2
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--1-2
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--2-2
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--9-2
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--10-2
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--3-2
inspect
class type inspect sdm-nat-user-protocol--4-2
inspect
class class-default
drop log
policy-map type inspect ccp-permit
class class-default
drop
policy-map type inspect ccp-permit-icmpreply
class type inspect ccp-icmp-access
inspect
class class-default
pass
zone security in-zone
zone security out-zone
zone-pair security ccp-zp-self-out source self destination out-zone
service-policy type inspect ccp-permit-icmpreply
zone-pair security ccp-zp-in-out source in-zone destination out-zone
service-policy type inspect ccp-inspect
zone-pair security ccp-zp-out-self source out-zone destination self
service-policy type inspect ccp-permit
zone-pair security sdm-zp-NATOutsideToInside-1 source out-zone destination in-zone
service-policy type inspect sdm-pol-NATOutsideToInside-1
interface Null0
no ip unreachables
interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description $ETH-LAN$
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
duplex auto
speed auto
no mop enabled
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
no mop enabled
interface ATM0/0/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
no atm ilmi-keepalive
interface ATM0/0/0.1 point-to-point
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5mux ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 1
interface ATM0/0/0.2 point-to-point
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
interface Ethernet0/0/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
shutdown
no mop enabled
interface ATM0/1/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
no atm ilmi-keepalive
interface ATM0/1/0.1 point-to-point
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5mux ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 2
interface Ethernet0/1/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
shutdown
no mop enabled
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/0
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/1
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/2
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/3
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/4
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/5
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/6
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3/7
no ip address
interface Vlan1
description $FW_INSIDE$
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip flow ingress
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
zone-member security in-zone
interface Dialer0
description $FW_OUTSIDE$
ip address negotiated
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip flow ingress
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
zone-member security out-zone
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
ppp authentication chap pap callin
ppp chap hostname [email protected]
ppp chap password 7 1444405858557A
ppp pap sent-username [email protected] password 7 135645415F5D54
ppp multilink
interface Dialer1
description $FW_OUTSIDE$
ip address negotiated
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip flow ingress
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
zone-member security out-zone
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 2
dialer-group 2
ppp authentication chap pap callin
ppp chap hostname [email protected]
ppp chap password 7 01475E540E5D55
ppp pap sent-username [email protected] password 7 055F5E5F741A1D
ppp multilink
router eigrp as#
router eigrp 10
network 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.1.0
no auto-summary
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http access-class 3
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000
ip dns server
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.10 3392 interface Dialer1 3392
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.10 3392 interface Dialer1 3392
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.35 3391 interface Dialer0 3391
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.35 3391 interface Dialer0 3391
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.5 3394 interface Dialer0 3394
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.5 3394 interface Dialer0 3394
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.17 3397 interface Dialer0 3397
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.17 3397 interface Dialer0 3397
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.10 14000 interface Dialer0 14000
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.10 14100 interface Dialer0 14100
ip nat inside source route-map ADSL0 interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map ADSL1 interface Dialer1 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 track 1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 track 2
ip access-list extended NAT
remark CCP_ACL Category=18
permit ip 192.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
ip access-list extended SDM_GRE
remark CCP_ACL Category=1
permit gre any any
remark CCP_ACL Category=1
ip access-list extended STATIC-NAT-SERVICES
permit ip host 192.168.1.35 any
permit ip host 192.168.1.5 any
permit ip host 192.168.1.10 any
permit ip host 192.168.1.17 any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
dialer-list 2 protocol ip permit
route-map ADSL0 permit 10
match ip address NAT
match interface Dialer0
route-map ADSL1 permit 10
match ip address NAT
match interface Dialer1
access-list 1 remark INSIDE_IF=Vlan1
access-list 1 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 remark HTTP Access-class list
access-list 2 remark CCP_ACL Category=1
access-list 2 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 deny any
access-list 2 remark HTTP Access-class list
access-list 2 remark CCP_ACL Category=1
access-list 3 remark HTTP Access-class list
access-list 3 remark CCP_ACL Category=1
access-list 3 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 3 deny any
access-list 10 remark INSIDE_IF=NAT
access-list 10 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 10 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 remark CCP_ACL Category=128
access-list 100 permit ip host 255.255.255.255 any
access-list 100 permit ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
access-list 100 permit ip 139.130.227.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 100 permit ip 203.45.106.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=0
access-list 101 permit ip any host 192.168.1.10
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=0
access-list 101 permit ip any host 192.168.1.35
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www
access-list 102 remark CCP_ACL Category=0
access-list 102 permit ip any host 192.168.1.35
access-list 102 remark CCP_ACL Category=0
access-list 102 permit ip any host 192.168.1.10
access-list 103 remark CCP_ACL Category=0
access-list 103 permit ip any host 192.168.1.5
access-list 104 remark CCP_ACL Category=0
access-list 104 permit ip any host 192.168.1.17
control-plane
banner login ^CCE-Rescue Systems^C
line con 0
login authentication local_authen
transport output telnet
line aux 0
login authentication local_authen
transport output telnet
line 2
no activation-character
no exec
transport preferred none
transport output lat pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh
stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
authorization exec local_author
login authentication local_authen
transport input telnet ssh
line vty 5 15
authorization exec local_author
login authentication local_authen
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end
Thanks
Shawn -
Cisco RV042 - Dual Wan Load Balancing - Secure Site (HTTPS) Trouble
PID VID :
RV042 V03
Firmware Version :
v4.0.0.07-tm (Aug 19 2010 19:19:50)
Ever since I setup my RV042 with load balancing using the Dual Wan system I have had trouble staying connected to some secure sites. After doing some searching I found that the potential issue is the IP change mid session.
"http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r25537589-Cisco-RV042-can-not-use-load-balancing-for-some-web-sites"
Although my interface is significantly different I was able to find the same area in my RV042 admin area however, it doesn't seem to work.
System Management
> Dual Wan
In Wan 1 & Wan 2 I have HTTPS and HTTPS Secondary all forwarded to use Wan 2 under Protocol Binding
This however has not managed to do anything at all for my network and every computer conneceted experiences the same HTTPS irregularities at some websites.
I'm sure I must be doing something wrong, but I don't know what it is.
Both incoming connections are from the same service provider although the plans are different.
Any help with this would greatly help me stop losing my mind trying to fight with my website control panel for 10 minutes to just login and get something done.
ThanksAny ideas or advice from anyone?
-
Cisco MDS Port channel load balancing
A customer recently asked an interesting question about exchange based load balancing on an FC port channel. The platform is UCS with an 8 and 16 port channel per fabric interconnect on two separate UCS domains. The application is Oracles data warehousing which has been known to saturate 4 x 8gb fc links. Since the balancing method is exchange based what constitutes the start and end of an exchange? We are trying to avoid a condition where and intense read write conversation locks to a single link in the port channel and not spread across 8/16 links. Where can I find more information about exchange based routing protocol or how should I go about managing extreme io in a converged infrastructure.
The default loadbalance method on FI and MDS is src-dst-ox-id based. Note that loadbalancing is done by a device on *outgoing traffic*. FI and MDS do not have to negotiate anything here. Technically, one device can do src-dst-id based while the other can use src-dst-ox-id. However, in your case there is no reason for such a change.
As I wrote before, If all of the links in the port-channel are touching the max capacity, you should recommend your customer to increase links in the bundle (max 16) or upgrade to 16G links. If few of the links are heavily utilized while other links in the same port-channel are under utilized, you may want to check the application or HBA for capability of breaking down the large reads/writes under smaller exchanges. If no traffic is going on few of the links at all, then I would suspect UCS to FI pinning as well. -
Cisco switches and virtual ip address(load balancing address) on xenapp portals
Hi I am quite new in configuring cisco switches and stumble across an issue after installing xenapp7.6 with load balanced portal to the ddc`s
It seems i only can ping or get access to portal if using real ip address behind cisco switch from other subnets in my network.
I can ping ddc01 and ddc02 and connect to the portal with http without problem. However when i triy to access the load balancing address of the ddc`s
it wont answer to ping or http
In same subnett it is no problem connecting to the load balancing address of the ddc`s, but in loactions on other subnets i only can access real server ip
eks
dd01 192.168.1.4 ok ping and access behind cisco switch from subnets
ddc02 192.168.1.5 ok to ping access behind cisco switch from subnets
load balancing for both ddc 192.168.1.6 not able to get answer og access from subnets, only in same subnett
Is there any way to configure switch to access the load balancing address of the ddc`s ?
Regards
Pål Arne RøbergWrong forum. This forum is dedicated to feedback related to CSC framework itself. You should not wish for response here.
Moved by moderator, no longer apply. -
Load Balancing b/w two cisco router
Hello Friends,
Please advise me,We are using two Cisco Routers with F5 Load balancer,
Router A (Cisco 2811) has one ISP configured
Router B (Cisco 3825) has the other ISP configured
ISP on Router A has 5 Mbps Bandwidth
ISP on Router B has 10 Mbps Bandwidth
My Doubt is if the load balancer is down,how to utilize the ISP (or) How to divert the connection ?
Here i have attached my N/w diagram for ur reference..........
Can someone solve my question.............please
Thank you.Hi Mohamed,
With default routing in use you can just configure one default route on each router But it would only do load sharing not load balancing.
PFR(performance routing) is a better solution but have never tried with two diffferent router series. Also need to validate if the router series you are using supports PFR.
Regards,
Sathvik K V -
Difference between Clustering and Load balancing
What is the difference between Clustering and Load balancing?
For example, We use Cisco Arrowpoint to do load balancing and it works fine for 3
Sun solaris boxes/WebLogic 6.1 SP1.
So what is the value addition to buy clustering license?
Thanks
Selvaraj
Hi.
Among other things, clustering allows you to share app data (such as http session
data) across cluster members, allowing you to failover should one cluster member
crash.
If your app is stateless then this doesn't mean much - load balancing alone would
probably be ok for you.
Regards,
Michael
Selvaraji wrote:
> What is the difference between Clustering and Load balancing?
>
> For example, We use Cisco Arrowpoint to do load balancing and it works fine for 3
> Sun solaris boxes/WebLogic 6.1 SP1.
>
> So what is the value addition to buy clustering license?
>
> Thanks
>
> Selvaraj
Michael Young
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support
-
Cluster/load balance weblogic using L4 switch like Alteon
Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more server and
cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like Alteon Layer4
switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to maintain a single copy
of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among servers)?
BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use a Layer 4
switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the application server
layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a single server
(it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers or 20 weblogic
servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable, sacalable and fast.
I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers need to
share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this approach will
fail.
So My understanding is:
Alteon with WL 6.0 can do load balancing for:
entity bean
stateless session bean
but can't do load balancing for:
stateful session bean (will persistent/sticky binding solve part of the
problem except fail-over)
in-memory replication
am I right?
Pao Wan
"Don Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> It is possible to configure Alteon to understand the WebLogic 6.0 cookie
format
> and have a proxy-less cluster configuration that performs load balancing
and
> fail over of session state.
>
> It is also possible to configure Alteon's hardware-based SSL decryption
for really
> fast HTTPS processing.
>
> We are working on a white paper that describes how to configure Alteon for
use
> with WebLogic Server 6.0.
>
> -Don
>
>
> Robert Patrick wrote:
>
> > Cameron,
> >
> > I believe that BEA tested their new proxy-less web clustering solution
with
> > load-balancing products from Alteon and several other vendors
(Arrowpoint ?--
> > which is now Cisco). However, it was my understanding that these
products do
> > not understand how to decrypt our cookies and extract IP addresses but
rather
> > these products are capable of doing sticky load balancing based on the
Session
> > ID contained in our cookie.
> >
> > If this is correct, then what this means is that when the primary server
fails,
> > the request will be routed to "some other server" in the cluster but not
> > necessarily the one that holds the secondary copy of the user's session.
The
> > change in WLS 6.0 is that WLS will accept these misdirected requests and
it will
> > go out to the correct server and "migrate" the session to the server
that
> > received the request making that server the new primary (and
regenerating the
> > Session ID).
> >
> > I am sure if this is wrong that our product manager or one of our
engineers will
> > correct me (please?)...
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > Robert
> >
> > Cameron Purdy wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Robert,
> > >
> > > FWIW - There are several vendors (Primeon? Arrowpoint?) who claim to
> > > understand WL cookies and parse the IPs out. (I haven't verified it
myself
> > > though.)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cameron Purdy
> > > Tangosol, Inc.
> > > http://www.tangosol.com
> > > +1.617.623.5782
> > > WebLogic Consulting Available
> > >
> > > "Robert Patrick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > There are not any hardware vendors (yet) that can understand
WebLogic's
> > > session
> > > > ID. While you might be able to use the load balancer without the
proxy on
> > > 5.1,
> > > > you would not be able to take advantage of in-memory replication
failover
> > > unless
> > > > you only had two machines in the cluster. Like you said, everything
will
> > > work
> > > > with 6.0 regardless of how the load balancer works (though you
really,
> > > really
> > > > want to minimize the number of times the requests come into the
wrong
> > > server by
> > > > utilizing sticky load balancing).
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps,
> > > > Robert
> > > >
> > > > Cameron Purdy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Rajesh,
> > > > >
> > > > > I meant that it would work in lieu of a proxy (such as Apache or
NES)
> > > with
> > > > > 5.1, but only if both the hw load balancer and WL were set up to
use
> > > > > cookies. Some hw load balancers rely on IP and that doesn't
work -- AOL
> > > > > connections for example can change the source IP on the fly.
Others
> > > produce
> > > > > their own cookies, that will work. Some even can use WL cookies
and
> > > parse
> > > > > them to determine where to go. According to what I've read, with
6.0 if
> > > the
> > > > > WL primary dies or for some other reason the request shows up at
the
> > > "wrong"
> > > > > server, it will be handled correctly. That means you are pretty
safe
> > > with
> > > > > hw load balancers and 6.0, almost regardless of the sticky
> > > implementation
> > > > > that they use.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cameron Purdy
> > > > > Tangosol, Inc.
> > > > > http://www.tangosol.com
> > > > > +1.617.623.5782
> > > > > WebLogic Consulting Available
> > > > >
> > > > > "Rajesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Cameron,
> > > > > > Can you elaborate on how it would work with WL5.1 since no in
memory
> > > > > replication
> > > > > > would happen if the servers are standalone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >Yes, this will work fine with WL6. (WL5.1 will work fine as
long as
> > > > > cookies
> > > > > > >are used by the load balancer.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >Cameron Purdy
> > > > > > >Tangosol, Inc.
> > > > > > >http://www.tangosol.com
> > > > > > >+1.617.623.5782
> > > > > > >WebLogic Consulting Available
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >"paowan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > > >news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > >> Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more
server
> > > and
> > > > > > >> cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like
Alteon
> > > > > Layer4
> > > > > > >> switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to
maintain a
> > > single
> > > > > > >copy
> > > > > > >> of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among
servers)?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use
a
> > > Layer
> > > > > > >4
> > > > > > >> switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the
application
> > > > > server
> > > > > > >> layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a
single
> > > > > server
> > > > > > >> (it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers
or 20
> > > > > weblogic
> > > > > > >> servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable,
sacalable
> > > and
> > > > > > >fast.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers
need to
> > > > > > >> share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this
> > > approach
> > > > > will
> > > > > > >> fail.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
>
-
Ise & vlan load balancing (user balancing)
As far as I know anb based on some esperience in a test environment it seems that cisco ISE among two load balancing radius kind of attributes supports only vlan gropu assignment, this means that on the switches vlan group assignment is required.
A second method of passing multiple vlans or vlan IDs by radius attributes is not allowed.
Am I wrong?
The issue I'm trying to overcome is the following
Subnet1 /24
Subnet2 /22
Many, many switches
(and the situation can't be changed)
Assuming the vlan assignment is local to the switch and with a round robin method, once the IPs are exhausted on Subnet1 only half of the clients that authenticate will obtain an IP (on Subnet2) while the rest will get stuck on Subnet1 without an IP
The same situation comes up when considering an odd number of authenticated clients on every switch and with two /24 subnets: it is likely possible that Subnet1 will be "full" before the second subnet does falling in the previous situation.
is there any solution?
thank you in advanceDon,
You are right. I should have said - Forte uses its own partitioning scheme
not the default scheme you see when you open partition workshop.
Nirmal
From: Don Nelson <[email protected]>
To: Nirmal P Uppalapati <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing, User Visible Service objects, Running man
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 10:45 PM
Nirmal,
One note on the "running man"...
At 08:12 PM 10/22/97 -0500, Nirmal P Uppalapati wrote:
3. Running Man
When you run an application by clicking on the running man Forte uses
its
default partitioning scheme and runs the application. The partitionscheme
that you made will be used only when you run the application distributedor
from the partition workshop. This is the time you might encounter errorsif
your partitioning is not right.
Actually, clicking on the "running man" from the repository or project
workshop will cause the application to be run VERY differently thanrunning
it distributed.
It's not technically correct to say that the default partitioning schemeis
used with the running man.
Forte consulting offers a deployment workshop that covers the finerpoints
of this and other distributed issues.
Don
============================================
Don Nelson
Regional Consulting Manager - Rocky Mountain Region
Forte Software, Inc.
Denver, CO
Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
aka: [email protected]
============================================
"If you ask me, though, any game without push-ups, hits, burns or noogies
is a sissy game." - Calvin -
3rd party distributed SW load balancing with In-Memory Replication
Hi,
Could someone please comment on the feasibility of the following setup?
I've started testing replication with a software load balancing product. This
product lets all nodes receive all packets and uses a kernel-level filter
to let only one node at the time receive it. Since there's minimum 1 heartbeat
between the nodes, there are several NICs in each node.
At the moment it seems like it doesn't work: - I use the SessionServlet - with
a 2-node cluster I first have the 2 nodes up and I access it with a single client:
.the LB is configured to be sticky wrt. source IP address, so the same node gets
all the traffic - when I stop the node receiving the traffic the other node takes
over (I changed the colours of SessionServlet) . however, the counter restarts
at zero
From what I read of the in-memory replication documentation I thought that it
might work also with a distributed software load balancing cluster. Any comments
on the feasability of this?
Is there a way to debug replication (in WLS6SP1)? I don't see any replication
messages in the logs, so I'm not even sure that it works at all. - I do get a
message about "Clustering Services startting" when I start the examples server
on each node - is there anything tto look for in the console to make sure that
things are working? - the evaluation license for WLS6SP1 on NT seems to support
In-Memory Replication and Cluster. However, I've also seen a Cluster-II somewhere:
is that needed?
Thanks for your attention!
Regards, Frank Olsen
We are considering Resonate as one of the software load balancer. We haven't certified
them yet. I have no idea how long its going to take.
As a base rule if the SWLB can do the load balancing and maintain stickyness that is fine
with us as long as it doesn't modify the cookie or the URL if URL rewriting is enabled.
Having said that if you run into problems we won't be able to support you since it is not
certified.
-- Prasad
Frank Olsen wrote:
> Prasad Peddada <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Frank Olsen wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> > We don't support any 3rd party software load balancers.
>
> Does that mean that there are technical reasones why it won't work, or just that
> you haven't tested it?
>
> > As >I said before I am thinking your configuration is >incorrect if n-memory
> replication is not working. I would >strongly suggest you look at webapp deployment
> descriptor and >then the config.xml file.
>
> OK.
>
> >Also doing sticky based on source ip address is not good. You >should do it based
> on passive cookie persistence or active >cookie persistence (with cookie insert,
> a new one).
> >
>
> I agree that various source-based sticky options (IP, port; network) are not the
> best solution. In our current implementation we can't do this because the SW load
> balancer is based on filtering IP packets on the driver level.
>
> Currently I'm more interested in understanding whether it can our SW load balancer
> can work with your replication at all?
>
> What makes me think that it could work is that in WLS6.0 a session failed over
> to any cluster node can recover the replicated session.
>
> Can there be a problem with the cookies?
> - are the P/S for replication put in the cookie by the node itself or by the proxy/HW
> load balancer?
>
> >
> >The options are -Dweblogic.debug.DebugReplication=true and
> >-Dweblogic.debug.DebugReplicationDetails=true
> >
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Frank Olsen
-
JOLT JSL Load Balancing ?
Hello
Question: If I have hundreds of JOLT clients accessing Tux services behind a
firewall, can/should I load balance across multiple JRLYs? Has anyone done
this with a Cisco, F5 or other load balancer? Or have you instead just
tinkered with the "appAddress" on the JOLT client.
Here's why I ask:
From the JOLT 1.2 documentation...
- Under normal conditions, only one JRLY can communicate with one JRAD.
- A JRAD can only point to one JSL.
So given the constraints above, it would look something like...
JRLYx ------||-------JRAD-------------JSL/JSH (Node X)
FireW
JRLYy ------||-------JRAD-------------JSL/JSH (Node Y)
If all JOLT requests to go one JRLY, they will pound the JSL/JSH on one
node. So load balancing would be preferred and I'd like to do something
smarter than defining half the clients with appAddress=JRLYx and the other
half with appAddress=JRLYy.
Thanks for taking the time to read this. I would imagine I'm not the first
to run into this.
-JonJolt, by definition, requires a Tuxedo setup. By specifying multiple
addresses in the appaddrlist, the Jolt connection pool will distribute
the connections across the addresses supplied. So yes, the appaddrlist
is only used to establish the physical connection. The JoltPoolManager
will hand out the connections in such a way as to distribute the load
across the existing connections.
Hope this helps,
Robert
Laurent Nel wrote:
> Robert Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
> >The Jolt connection pool can be configured to distribute
> >its connections
> >across multiple JSL on multiple machines (by specifying
> >more than one
> >address in the appaddrlist argument in the configuration
> >of the pool).
> >Obviously, once a request is sent from WLS to a specific
> >JSH process,
> >Tuxedo load-balancing is used to determine which Tuxedo
> >server will
> >process the request.
>
> So, does this requires a Tuxedo setup ?
> I would like to know if it is possible to do load-balancing using
> only the appaddrlist of the Jolt pool ?
> My understanding of this list is that it is used only to determine
> to which tuxedo server the jolt client is going to open a connection.
> The online doc says that the server is choosen 'randomly' (I guess
> that it means in a unpredictable way).
>
> Laurent
-
Hi guys,
I put this question on Spiceworks and someone chimed in and said it wasn't possible due to the nature of how etherchanel balances, but I wanted to double check. Here is my question:
I have a cisco SG200-18 managed switch configured with LAG with LACP and a new Supermicro X9SCM-F motherboard that uses two Intel NICs (82579LM & 82574L). The server is running Server 2012 r2 standard and I'm teaming the NICs via intel's driver. The team type is set to IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic Link Aggregation. From my understand that means that inbound and outbound packets should be able to utilize the increased bandwidth (thus the dynamic part). So far in my testing coping files to and from the server from multiple PCs at the same time only files being copied from the server utilize the increased bandwidth. I can see in task manager on the server that the ethernet is using over 1 Gbps. However, files going TO the server from multiple computers at the same time max out at 1Gbps.
Any insight on why this would be?
Edit: Also want to note that the switch is running the most recent version of the firmware.
Attached you'll find some screen setups of the different windows on the server & the switch. Thanks!Hello,
This is a common question with LACP and LAGs in general.
It all comes down to this. Any single connection will only ever be able to use a single member of the LAG. Meaning that whatever the maximum speed (1Gbps) of one physical link is, that is the limit of the transfer.
It is because of how the load balancing algorithm works. When a packet comes in, the switch hashes either the IP or MAC address of the source and destination, and comes up with a number. If your LAG has 4 links, it is a number from 1-4. That determines which link in the LAG gets used in that connection. That connection will only ever use that LAG member, and cannot spill over, even if the link it is using gets full.
The load balancing algorithm can be changed to better utilize the links, however the test of a single computer transferring to another computer will always give the results you saw.
There are several enterprise level Cisco switches which can load balance based on source and destination port number, which could enable two computers to utilize multiple links, if they were transferring data on different TCP ports. However the small business switches are only able to load balance by MAC/IP. You can experiment with the load balancing setting to see which setting optimizes your link usage. You may also be able to tweak this setting on the server side, but that one is up to you.
Hope that helps a bit, you've done some nice testing already, so I'm really just confirming what you've already seen.
Thank you for choosing Cisco,
Christopher Ebert
Network Support Engineer - Cisco Small Business Support Center -
Network load balancer for Agentry applications
Hi Expert,
I'm going to implement a SAP Mobile Platform solution that will use an agentry application and I need some clarification about the HA configuration and the usage of the network load balancer and relay server. Just for information I'm going to use SMP 2.3 SP4.
My understanding is that Relay server is a reverse proxy and load balancer for SMP but It can't be used for the agentry applications. Is this correct?
Based on the standard configuration in order to balance the load of the client devices in the SMP cluster I have to use a Network load balancer, therefore the technical architecture of my solution should be the following:
|Agentry Client device| ----> | Network Load Balancer | ----> | SMP and Agentry Cluster| -----> |Back end systems|
Is this correct? I didn't find specifications about the Network load balancer.. Is there a list of the Network load balancer products supported from SAP for agentry application. Is there any best practice on the network load balancer?
Thank you in advance for you collaboration.
BR
g.
Tags edited by: Michael ApplebyBecause we don't test any directly with our QA we don't have have a preferred products. Talking to our consulting group they normally just use what the customer already has installed in their network. Both Software or hardware load balancers has been used.
The key part needed for the load balancer for Agentry 6.0.x and SMP 2.3 (not SMP 3) that it is set to TCP Pass through.
Stephen -
Aggressive Load Balancing = unstable network
Last week we upgraded 26 WLCs 4400 controllers from version 5.2.178 to version 6.0.188.0/6.0.196.0.
Two days after the upgrade, IT-administrators had reported problems with 15 of the WLCs.
The symptoms was:
- Problems conntecting to SSIDs
- Unstable network when connected
- Clients didnt get a IP-adress
- Unstable signal strength
After some troubleshooting, it turned out "Aggressive load-balancing" was enabled on the WLCs having these problems.
Output from one WLC:
(Cisco Controller) >show load-balancing
Aggressive Load Balancing........................ Enabled
Aggressive Load Balancing Window................. 0 clients
Aggressive Load Balancing Denial Count........... 3
Statistics
Total Denied Count............................... 5873 clients
Total Denial Sent................................ 14067 messages
Exceeded Denial Max Limit Count.................. 2924 times
None 5G Candidate Count.......................... 8215 times
None 2.4G Candidate Count........................ 2331 times
Yesterday we ran this command on these WLCs:
config load-balancing aggressive disable
..and the problems now seem to have dissappeared.
Aggressive load-balancing is disabled as default in the newest versions of WLC software, but we have upgraded since version 4.0.155.5 (where I think this was enabled as default), and I guess this setting was enabled because of that.
Some info from cisco.com about aggressive load balancing:
Aggressive load-balancing works at the association phase. If enabled and the conditions to load-balance are met, when a wireless client attempts to associate to a LAP, association response frames are sent to the client with an 802.11 response packet that includes status code 17. This code indicates that the AP is too busy to accept any more associations.
It is the responsibility of the client to honor, process or discard that association response frame with reason code 17. Some clients ignore it, even though it is part of the 802.11 specification. The standard dictates that the client driver must look for another AP to connect to since it receives a "busy" message from the first AP it tries. Many clients do not do this and send the association request again. The client in question is allowed on to the wireless network upon subsequent attempts to associate.
Just wanted to post this in case others are experiencing problems like we didTweak your RF. You need to adjust the TX power and the data rates. The reason you have one AP with 9 clients is probably because that AP has the lowest TX power setting like 7-8. Make each AP the same TX power level, depending on how many AP's and how big the room is. You will need to play around with this and the data rates to achieve what you want.
Here is a guide to look at too
http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/education/cisco_wlan_design_guide.pdf
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
Maybe you are looking for
-
hi, i have a problem when trying to install gcc on solaris 10. my path: PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/sfw/lib:/usr/sfw/libexec # gcc test.c gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory i don't know what the probl
-
Label printing issues in Sapscript
We are struggling with building a new label for a finished good. On previous labels we used barcode BC_CD39. This new label requires a mix of same barcode and 2D barcode. One of the issues is BC_CD39 is it is too big at 13mm. So we want to use CD
-
Problem with advanced data Grid
Hi, I am new to flex. I am designing the UI using flex. I need to that know tht using advanced datagrid when i click the add button the content in my textbox need to be displayed in my ADG, and also i need to know when i click the add button i should
-
on normal view my website displays well but on edit the page is distorted that Iis the parts of the pages move away from there normal position.Its like the css is not implemented.
-
Unable to load .xmp files
I'm having a difficult, okay, impossible time getting previously created .xmp side-cart files to load and I'm wondering if there's a compatibility issue going on here. Originally, the files were created from RAW files in LR 1.5 on a MAC. I've since u