Clearing Storage type 902

Hi Guys,
When we receive stock in our warehouse we use STO to post stock from SIT to 902 snd send stock to 500 for putaways.
Some end-user reversed the GR and GI from the STO,NOW 902 is sitting with a negative amount,how can i solve this issue?

Silas,
The reason you have this problem is as follows
1 You processed the 101 receipt for a STO. The stock was receipted into 902. You then moved some of this stock from 902 to 500 then into the racks.
2 A small balance of the stock remained in 902 which you were asked to clear by reversing it.
3 Instead of reversing just the stock in 902, the full STO was reversed using a 102 movement
This reversal created the negative stock in 902.
You need to reverse the 102 movement which will reverse your negative stock.
If you think about it. in 902 you had say -100 cases, in the racks you have 100 cases. This results in a total stock holding of zero stock. Because your delivery was created before the STO reversal and the TOs afterwards, WM found the stock in the racks and created pick instructions which you executed. When you can to do the post goods issue, SAP issued a error message telling you you had a deficit of stock in IM becuase in IM your stock is zero. Reversing the STO will include the stock in IM and nett off the negative stock and then you will be able to PGI.
Cheryl

Similar Messages

Question about storage type 902

Hello Everybody!
I´m implementing SAP WM and I have a doubt and is the next one:
When I do a material movement, system returns an error if the material is not create in the destiny storage type.
On the other hand, I create a purchase order and when I make the good entrance, the system stocks the material in the storage type 902 even the material is not create in this storage type.
Why is the reason for this? Is not necessary to create the materials in the standar storage type like 902?
Thank you very much for your help!

Hello Javier
You are right when it comes to goods receipt or goods issue. All the 9** series storage types are interim storage types which are fictitious. You only have to create 1 bin for each interim storage types. When you create the material master maintain the WM views only for the warehouse number and the other storage types that you use where all the bins are located. For storage types 902 the PO/inbound delivery number and for 916 outbound delivery number will be displayed as the bin numbers which are dynamic bins that gets deleted automatically once you complete the movements.
Thanks
Anandha

Stock transfer Order goods receipt puts goods into storage type 902 Q

How do we configure the STO GR to use storage type 917 as our purchase oders do?
Thanks

Hi,
Please check your settings in WM-IM interface (SPRO > LE > WM > Interfaces > IM > Define Movement Types). HEre you can check which WM-mvt belongs to (trough reference mvt) the IM-mvt.
After that (knowing which WM-mvt is to be modified), in SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Transfers > Define Movement Types, you can define the interim storage type for your WM-mvt (please take care of choosing the proper WH & mvt combination).
Regards,
Csaba

Storage Bin for Interim Storage Type 902 for GR

Hi,
We know that the the dynamic storage bin for goods receipt for PO is the PO number. However, when we are posting GR, system creates TR with interim storage bin as material document number.
I looked into the movement type config. However, we can only state that whether interim bin should be cordinates or fixed bin or dynamic bin. It has no way to mention what that dynamic bin would be.
Can you please suggest a way to change the dynamic storage bin as PO number instead of material document number.
Thanks,
Shekhar

Dear Shekhar,
Could you please check in view V_T308 (transaction code OMNF) whether the indicator "Dynamic bin material document" is set for your warehouse number and requirement type B?
Best regards,
Christiane
Edited by: Christiane Schnellenbach on Apr 12, 2010 10:25 PM

WM- Wrongly triggered storage section in 902 storage type

hi
   I maintained the storage section( B11) in 902/ WE-ZONE . When i generated the GRN against purchase order ,
   during transfer syatem storage type 902 is triggering the storage section 001.. i dont want system trigger the storage
   section 001 for storage type 902..the system should generate the 902 for storage section(B11)
With Regards
Dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Dec 29, 2011 5:22 AM

Hi,
This is a std system behaviour, since the configuration is done like this in SPRO.Please check for the settings against storage type 902.
spro->Logistics execution->WM->Master data-->Define storage type -
>Define stsorage section
The system picks the section from here
Regards,
Velu

ECC6.0 WM creation of one TO per Storage Type

Hello,
I'm currently implementing WM at my customer using various Storage Types. During testing we created GR in IM for 2 materials (in one document), one of them is relevant to quality inspection but the other one is not.
TO creation has been done automatically (as expected) from interim storage type 902 GR area) to interim storage type 917 (quality area) for the first position. Also a position for the second line has been created from 902 to storage type 042 (main shelf).
Technically this is all OK. However I was expecting to have 2 TO's instead of 1 TO with 2 positions. How can I trigger the system to create a seperate TO per destination storage type?
Thanks beforehand big time!
Alex

Hi,
It was working at the time I posted...so, please complain at SAP AG...
You can use this link to access online SAP help:
http://help.sap.com/
('SAP R/3 and R/3 Enterprise' - on the left)
E.g.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
(you can use search term 'Transfer order split')
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f83df24afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Additionally you can use this as well:
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LEWM/MMWM.pdf
BR
Csaba

Storage types

Hi All
The user requirement is
M-MATERIAL
If the material is received through AIR(aeroplane) it has to follow one storage type search strategy and if the procuremnt is through road transportation it has to follow another strategy.
For eg: Through Air-storage types -ch1,ch2,ch3
Through road-ch3,ch2,ch1
How to configure this in the storage type search table cfor the same material.
Regards
tcr

when you receive materials with MIGO, you do not enter anything in MIGO to let SAP know whether it was received from plane or truck. This info is probably only in your purchase order.
Even further, this MIGO receipt creates inventory in storage type 902 along with a transport request. And when you convert this TR into a TO, then the putaway strategy comes into the game.
Means you are 2 steps beyond the the element that has the information that the material should come by plane or truck.
The quant in 902 storage type does not know anything about how it came, nor the transport request.
In customizing of putaway strategy you can see the fields that can be used to differentiate the storage type search
as well as in this docu: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_insu464/helpdata/EN/2e/1939516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
So, the only option you have is probably a user exit, where you read the PO again to get knowledge about the shipping mode, and to decide then which strategy you want use.

Bins in the interim storage type

Hi
The client has a requirement where the interim storage type 902 (GR Area External Receipts) needs to be bin managed. i.e. it should be possible to select the bins manually. Std. system has PO no. as dynamic bin. Is this possible? If yes, how??
Thanks in advance
DB

yes, this is possible..
Check the documentation(sap library) on this for details..

In WM how to clear partially difference in an open storage type with one mi

Hi
I would like to know how in WM to clear partially differences in an open storage type with one mixed bin not totally counted?
thanks in advance
cadanj

Please do the inventory check for the whole bin.Count the each quant of the material. Difference can be cleared.Use following transactions.
1.LI01N-Create Inventory document.
2.LI11N-Enter inventory count.
3.LI20-Clear WM differences
4.LI21-Clera IM differences.
Let me know if u have any other question.
Regards,
PRashant

Issue with clearing the Differences in 999 storage type in HU managed S.Loc

Hi Experts,
We are trying to writeoff the differences stocks which are there in 999 storage type, but getting an error message 'Quantity difference document line item for HU's' with Message class L6 & Message number 606. Any idea how this can be resolved?
I can see that for this product/batch combination there is another HU in packing area 923 which is acting as a SU because the item level details are deleted for this HU. Could this be the issue for the errror? Would need some pointers to clear this stocks.
Thanks,
Harish

The item details of the HU seems to be have deleted, causing the difference between HU, IM/WM stocks. We have deleted the HU using HUMO & then the HU difference quantity was posted using HUDIFF.
Thanks,
Harish

Transfer between storage types and putaway strategies

Dear All,
Here is my scenario and please guide me on as detailes as you gurus can on how to proceed achieve this:
When receiving good from a PO the materials are received in 902: How to move them to my Raw materials storage type?
Note: I have defined 4 storages types, one for raw materials, one for production, one for Finished goods and one for spare parts.
And once I move the materials into the warehouse, what strategies do I have to define in order to place the materials in specific bins? Here's an explanation on how I need the putaway:
I have 5 different racks or stacks but I need all materials to be placed in a specific row of the first level, lets say material A in 01-A-01 the first 2 digits are stack then level then row(SS-L-RR); Material B should be placed 01-A-02 Material C 01-A-03; meaning all the materials should be placed in the level A of stack 1 but if there is another recepit of material A and it is already full then the system should propose another bin doesn't matter which one as long as it is not in the first level (because this positions are reserved for other materials).
This is the same for materials D, E, F but those are to be placed in stack 02 in level A
I need this because that's the way my client work right now, it is like Lean manufacturing strategy, so whenever they need to pick materials they always have them available at the lowest level
Is there an automatic bin to bin TO creation for when the picking empty the bin at the lowest level then a TO should be triggered automaticaly saying move from whatever bin the material is available to the "fixed" bin assigned in level A
Stack 1                         Stack 2
Level     1     2     3          Level     1     2     3
D     free     free     free          D     free     free     free
C     free     free     free          C     free     free     free
B     free     free     free          B     free     free     free
A     A     B     C          A     D     E     F
The variable here is that as I said before I have 5 Racks so in the other 3 stacks doesn't matter the levels, the materials can be placed wherever, and this will happen when receiving material A but all stack 1 is full then system should try to place it in the nearest bin available of stack 2 (only levels B, C, D) or if this is also full, then goes to stack 3 ( all levels available)
Please advise on how to map this, and the transactions and mvt types involved, and also please explain how should I make the picking or removal strategy to propose the picking always from the specific lower level bin, if not enough qty available then go and pick from other bin (and if it is possible at this point to create a TO to refill the fixed lower bin)
Thanks in advande to all.
Julio

Hi,
Try using movement type 313 and 315
313 -- Transfer posting SL to SL --- Remove from issuing SL
315 -- Transfer posting SL to SL -- Placing in Receiving SL
Regards

Production Order backflush creating Negative in Storage Type

Hi All,
We have setup storage types into which stock is replenished based on Min/Max. These storage types have been setup in a control cycle and supply area to backflush upon confirmation of the production order.
I know this is user error, but when doing confirmation (CO15) or clearing COGI the user enters a batch not in one of those storage types (but available at IM level), it creates a negative in these storage types for that batch even though the storage types are setup NOT to allow negative stock.
Is there any other setting or any notes that can be applied to avoid this issue?
Thanks
J

OSS note 489754:
The settings in Customizing which define that no negative stocks are allowed for the storage type, have only an effect on the transfer orders. In addition, you must also set message L9040 as an error message. For this, call up the Customizing and branch to: 'Logistics Execution -> Warehouse Management -> Interfaces -> Inventory Management -> Allow negative Stocks in Interim Storage Types'. There, execute point 'Control of System Messages in Warehouse Management' and enter message type 'E' for message number L9040.

High Level Bin Search, before Storage Type Search

Hi,
Can anyone help me to guide, which user Exit/Badi, be used for searching Empty bins, before storage type search. I come to know from one of colleague below message.
"" if you want to check the quantities on a higher level (before storage type search ), you can use the user exit "+++".""
I am unable to understand which kind of user exit "+++".
Background: Want to do putaway with storage type 007: Our high rack is having space (Bins) with different capacity. One rack can have 4 type of racks.
We want to putaway material with different bin types in one storage type.
Regards,
Mainsh Gupta

Hi Vijay,
Thanks for your quick reply. I am trying user exit given by you. Once again I would like to submit my requirements here.
a) We have 98 racks in Warehouse.
b) Product is Ball Bearing.
c) Bearings are handeled in Ea, Issue and Stock unit is Ea
d) Alternate Unit of Measure is Box, i.e. per box quantity is mentioned into Material Master.
e) Each Rack is having 5 different type of bins.
f) We want to fill rack from bottom to top for first rack, and then next rack.
g) Once we do putaway for any material, each time system should pick Next empty bin, and each bin type is different.
Case 1) If going with Storage Type 007:
                i) Need to maintain palletization data in Material master WM view 2.
               ii) Can not maintain any capacity check for Capacity utilization in Material Master. Capacity is only Pallatization data.
              iii) While creating TO, System goes for placemet of material from bottom to Top in Rack, but give similar quantity for each bin, & these quantities are defined from Material Master from Palletization data.
              iv) In this case it is not checking bin capacity.
My query:
i) How can we split quantity during TO Creation based on Next Empty Bin avaialbe with certain capacity and all further bins with other capacity.
ii) Can we have different type of bins in one storage type if we are going for Storage type 007. or it is mandatory to have similar kind of bins.
Case 2) If going for Storage type 002:
              i) Not maintined Palletiztaion data in Material master.
             ii) Maintining capacity check in WM View 1.
            iii) Maintained Capacity check in Bin master.
            iv) WHile careting TO , system doesnot spilt quantity for next empty bins avaialbe, Only one line item comes for whole quantities. and system throw an error.
Message Number: Message no. L3068
Message Details: Maximum quantity for storage bin TR-15 will be exceeded by 740.000 PC
My query: How can we split TO quantity as per next empty bins available.
If you will give me your contact number, I can speak to you over phone and eleborate in more details for your clear understanding my issue.
Regards,
Manish

Fixed / non-fixed storage in one storage type

Hi,
Within our warehouse we have one area with fixed locations for some products, other products not. No clear physical separation can be made.
Is it possible to create one(!) storage type in which fixed and non-fixed can be stored while using one putaway strategy. If so, how to set this up?
Thanks!

Hi,
Point is that we want to keep the warehouse as flexible as possible. By using storage sections you still have to assign bin locations to a specific section.
Within a range of 300 bins we might only want to use bin 20, 35 and 231 as fixed. In the future we might want to use bin 22 as well for a specific article. Based on your suggestion of using sections we have to assign bin 20, 35, 231 and 22 to a specific section. Correct?
Based on your suggestion; is the storage type putaway strategy "F" (Fixed) or "L" (First empty bin)?
Thanks, Roel
PS Somehow I logged in as someone else, therefor the reply as if I was the one of the first post...

Regard an error "Storage type & notsuitable as interface (SU mgmt is active

Hi All,
I am trying to do the inventory clearing in both warehouse and Inventory management using the transactions LI20 and LI21 after counting the inventory. But whenever I am trying to do the writeoff's I am facing with an error "Storage type & not suitable as an interface (SU management is active)"
I couldnt able to figure out the main cause for this error. Your valuable suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Shane

Hi Jürgen L,
My objective is to do physical inventory and of ther are any differences then write them........in this sytem Both Grants and fund management is involved?
I am getting this message while I am doing LI21. And you have suggested that, the difference storage type SU managed. which is a 999 storage type. and this is not SU managed.
I would also like to ask regarding the clearing of differences in warehouse and Inventory mangement. I am using the mvmt types 711 and 712, But what account documents will get generated. I am thinking there will be no account documents that will get generated. Adding to this I am getting "Account 6701 requires an assignment to a CO object with Message no. KI235". If we do this assignment to this CO object......... doesnt the transaction go and hit the balance sheet account.
I am lil baffled with this whole process. If you could give me your valuable information, that will help me a lot.
Shane.

Clearing Storage type 902

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for