Close the Process Orders

Hi All,
Need to close the process orders which are in TECO ststus.
There is no batch number assigned to the process order so no consumption of materials.
The activities are in CRTD WRCE status which are not allowing the process order to close.
Regards,
Mallika

Please follow the below path,
Cor2 --> Process Orders --> Functions --> Restrict Processing --> Complete Technically.
Once the Order are in TECO you cant do the change in its activity.

Similar Messages

  • Mass Close of Process Orders

    Is there any way to close multiple process orders at the same time?  I'm using COHVPI for doing mass TECO but it doesn't have a close option.
    Thanks,
    Rosalind

    Rosalind,
    Use transaction CORM for your purpose.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • How to close old process orders dated 2006?

    I have a open process order dated back to 2006. There is a negative balance of -$100 on this order.
    Now in 2010 i want to close this order. The status of this order is TECO. However when i want to close this order, the system says i need to settle the negative balance first before doing so.
    Hence when i run the settlement to material the system says the process order is not technically completed yet because i have not done the final delivery yet.
    When i do final delivery using a current date in 2010, the system said it could not determine the object currency for the activity types used in the order since the cost center tied to the activity type has a validity date of up to 31/12/2006 only.
    In this case i am stuck one after another situations. How can i close this order without going through all the above conditions?

    Hi,
    One alternative is to change the Settlement profile setting (attached to Order type) in OKO7 to 'Can be Settled' from 'To be settled in Full' briefly, which allows you to close the Order even with some balance on it. Revert back the setting once you are done.
    Hope this helps.

  • Process Order does Confirmations and GR even after the Process order is CNF

    Not Sure why the Formatting is lost.
    Hi Gurus,                                                                               
    I am a beginner in this area and request your help.                                                                               
    We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
    The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
    We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
    Case 1:
    1. Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only 100 is accepted.
    2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
    3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
    That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
    Case 2: (The one with the problem)
    1.  Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only the 100 is accepted.
    2.  25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
    3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
    At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
    4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
    The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
    5. The Process order  allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are  same .
    so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Suraj

    Hi Suraj,
    I am not positive, but I suspectt the problem lies in the BAPI.  It might be how you have the data set in MII, but it sounded like you are doing it correctly. 
    However there are a number of things you can do to troubleshoot your situation.
    First create a few process orders to test with. 
    Record the confirmation numbers and counters for each of the following:
    1) Do a final confirmation (for quantity of 25 instead of the 100) in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using). 
    2) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) in SE37 or BAPI in ERP using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
    3) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) from MII using your current transaction. 
    Review the confirmations in ERP to see if there are any differences.
    Review the confirmaitons in MII to see if there are any non visible differences (use a Tracer to retrieve the response segment from an execution of BAPI_PROCORDCONF_GETDETAIL using the recorded confirmation numbers and counters) 
    Case 1) If there are differences in the results, that should tell you how to modify your transaction to include or change the appropriate values in your inputs. 
    Case 2) If there are no differences, then it is most likely that there is something not working properly in the BAPI you are using.  It may not completely replicate the functionality in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using in ERP).  Then open a ticket, because the BAPI is not working as it should.
    Good luck,
    Mike
    Edited by: Michael Appleby on Aug 17, 2009 8:20 PM

  • Error while releasing the Process order

    while releasing the Process order i am getting the follwing error message
    Message no. CO118      Release of order not possible
    Cna you Please any body explain me detail of thi error ie where the error lies.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    In Process Order Header Screen Go to ---> Log ---> On Release.Here you will find the detail error behind this problem.Go though it .Resolve it and then try to release the Process Order, and if required get back to us.
    Suppose reason may be,
    - Missing part
    - Missing Capacity
    - Batch Determination is required to perform.
    - Any User Exit (Other then std. SAP)
    Regards,
    Dhaval

  • Error while saving the process order

    Hi All,
    I changed the quantities of the components and trying to save the process order. But I'm getting a message " "PLEASE REEXPLODE BOM, SINCE THE PROCESS ORDER COMPONENTS HAVE CHANGE". What would be the reason? It is not happening to all the users. Some users can able to save after changing the qty. Some users can't?
    Regards,
    Sureshbabu G.

    Hi,
    "PLEASE REEXPLODE BOM, SINCE THE PROCESS ORDER COMPONENTS HAVE CHANGE"
    I think it is your Develpment and not from SAP Standard One.So it is difficult to trace out the cause, better will be contact your devlopment team to trace out the reason.
    Regards,
    Dhaval

  • How does the GR processing time affect the scheduling of the process order & the latest start date in the operation.

    Hi
    Can anyone explain  how does the GR processing time affect the scheduling of the process order & the latest start date in the operation overview.

    Hi
    GR processing time means number of workdays required after receiving the material in storage.
    Check this link:GR Processing time
    Regards,
    Anupam Sharma

  • Not able to see the Cost analysis in the Process order (T-Code COR2).

    Hi SAP Guru's
    Csoting in the Process order Configuration.
    I have done the Config setting related to the Product Costing Controlling with regard to the
    Cost Sheet, Cost Componet Structure.Overheads, asssigning the Cost elements in the Costing sheet.
    assigned the same in the Process order.
    And also the Costing variant options seen in OPL1 t-code can not be displayed in the Process order Csoting Variant selection.
    where as the in the Costing variant for the cost component structure, i can see  the Xompany code with required plant details.
    looking  the costing alanysis data in Process order, unable to see

    Hi,
    If you are looking at cost analysis.  You will get this only some you do confirmations to the production or process Order.
    I hope you did confirmation of material and quantities to the Process Order
    Best Regards
    Surya

  • Fiscal Year Not allowed while creating the Process order (COR1)

    Hi Friends,
    My Indian client is following the Fiscal year of 2011 for the period of April 2010 to March 2011). We have gone live one month before. But now the problem we are facing is while creating the process order (T.Code COR1) system gives the error message "Fiscal year 2010 is not allowed".
    The Diagnosis shows as below
    Fiscal year 2010 is not allowed
    Message no. F5568
    Diagnosis
    The fiscal year entered (2010) is different from the fiscal year derived from the posting date and fiscal year variant (2011).
    System Response
    Error.
    Procedure
    Correct the fiscal year entered.
    I have Checked the Controlling area version. Fiscal Year 2011 starts from 01.04.2010. This issue is only at the time of Process oder creation and not in other module like FI, MM, SD, PS, QM and PM. I have checked with V3 Variant also and there is no problem with that.
    Can any one help me where the setting is missing or what whould be the probable reason for this issue.
    Regards,
    Deva

    Hi Prakash,
    Thank you for your reply. I have checked the MMPV and MMRV set up and that is fine with fiscal year 2011. We are also processed lot many Material receipts for the fiscal year 2011. I have checked with OB52 for finace it is opened for the entire year of 2011 from 2009 for all periods.
    We are facing only when we try to create the process order. When we enter the starte date as 24.11.2010 the derived period shows as fiscal year 2011. But entered fiscal year shows as 2010. We are not entering any other dates in the process order.
    Is there any other probablity the date is picking from any Production related set ups??
    The costing version fiscal year 2011 starts from 01.04.2010. So no problem with Controlling area. I have Checked the Factory calendar. The calendar starts from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.2010 for the year 2010.
    Is there any other possibility of the missing settings or problem in date control???
    Regards,
    Deva

  • Problem of Missing parts during the Process Order release

    Hi
    For a Make to Order strategy, I have run MRP for a sales order which resulted in planned order for the material. But when I try to convert the Planned Order to Process Order, I am getting error Parts are missing during the availabilty check even though the components are available in the stock.
    But when I create a Process Order manually, I am not facing the problem of missing parts as stock for components are available in stock.
    Please advice why I am facing the problem with Planned Orders which are created via MRP.
    Regards
    Brijesh

    Dear all,
    If we set the Individual requirement (1) in MRP4 view of the material master for the component, the system will not consider the plant stock and it will give the message like Parts are missing during the Process Order process even though the plant stock is exists for the component.
    So I would like to where in customization you define this?
    --> To not consider the plant stock if individual req is set (1)
    --> To consider the plant stock if collective req is set (2)
    Kindly advice,
    Regards,
    Brijesh

  • Problem in TECOing/Closing the process order.

    Hi PP Gurus,
    We're facing a problem when trying to TECO the process order and system is generating the error message
    Message no. BS013 (System status CRCR is active (ORD 1000xxxxxx))
    We're using Browser based PI sheet here to process the order.
    If anybody faced the same, please reply.
    Regards,
    Abu Arbab

    Hi Rupesh,
    Thanks for reply
    Though we set 'Clear Reservation' in intial screen of COR6N/CORK/CO15/Co11N, it'll wok only for those components which are having Backflush indicator set. As in PI sheet, Goods Issues section is completely different and Ticket confirmation is different. And the components that we're using are not backflushed components, so it makes no sense though we put Clear Reservation in confirmation through PI sheet.
    Now the actual issue comes into picture when in Goods Issue table we put Issue indicator= final and it is properly updated for that component in MSEG table. But when we go and check in RESB table or COR3/COR2 there is no final indicator set in Component detail. Is this standard behavior of SAP or are we missing something here?
    Please help
    Regards,
    Abu Arbab

  • Confirmation number sequence in the process order

    Hi,
    When we create a process order , system assigns the confirmation no for each of the operation & these confirmation numbers are in sequence.
    In our case we have activity numbers in the recipe as 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0050, 0060...... Subsequently we have inserted operations..now the sequence has become 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0041, 0042, 0050, 0060...... Now when we create the process order, the confirmation numbers for operations 0041, 0042 comes after 0060. We have a development which has a pre-requisite that the sequence of confirmation no's should be as per sequence of operations.
    Any idea how to achieve the correct sequence of confirmation no's?
    regards,
    Mohit

    Dear Mohit,
    I have find the route cause BUT I Don't know how to fix it
    Based on Operation ID, system is creating a confirmation No
    Since you have created a operation 41 and 42,  System gives the operation ID next to 60
    Thats the reason system is giving the confirmation No after 60
    I don't know how To add operation ID in routing

  • Reprint the processed order with BDC call transaction

    Hi Mentors,
    I have a problem with printing the order which is coming in a cockpit program.
    for that i am using the bdc and call transaction 'ZVA31' which is exactly the standard program 'SD70AV1A'.
    but after first processing i am not able to reprint the processed order.
    Below is my bdc code and i am using processing mode 1 at the time of recording.
    FORM ZSD70AV1A_PRINT_BA01 USING p_vbeln TYPE vbeln.
    DATA: wa_ba01 TYPE nast-kschl VALUE 'BA01'.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SD70AV1A' '1000'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
    'RG_KSCHL-LOW'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
    '=ONLI'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RG_KSCHL-LOW'
    wa_ba01."wa_ba01."'ba01'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'PM_NSORT'
    '01'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'PM_VERMO'
    '1'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RG_VBELN-LOW'
    p_vbeln."'513785'.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMSSY0' '0120'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
    '04/03'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
    '=&ALL'.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMSSY0' '0120'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
    '04/03'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
    '=PROC'.
    CALL TRANSACTION 'ZVA31' USING BDCDATA
    MODE   'A'
    MESSAGES INTO MESSTAB.
    CLEAR BDCDATA[].
    ENDFORM.                    " ZSD70AV1A_PRINT_BA01
    Br,
    Surya

    Solved myself.
    DATA: wa_ba00 TYPE nast-kschl VALUE 'BA00'.
    DATA: p_vermo TYPE kschl.
    DATA: cur_vstat TYPE nast-vstat.
    SELECT SINGLE vstat INTO cur_vstat FROM nast
    WHERE objky = p_vbeln
    AND   kschl = 'BA00'.
    IF sy-subrc = 0 AND cur_vstat = 0.
    p_vermo = '1'."wa_vstat.
    ELSE.
    p_vermo = '2'.
    ENDIF.
    p_vermo is processing status.
    Br,
    Surya

  • Mass updation of Priority field in the process order header screen

    Hi Friends,
    Can any body knows on how to do mass update the Priority field in the process orders after release.(with out upload using BDC).
    or can we update the priority field in process order during mass release of process orders using  T- code: COHVPI?
    Is there any standard transaction? else please tell me the solution if there is any other way of doing this task.
    thanks&regards,
    Purna

    Purnachander,
    Your requirement can not be fullfilled with any standard transaction.
    BDC is best suitable option.
    Hope this helps you.
    SmanS

  • Unable to Close the Purchase order : You cannot post acquisitions to asset

    Hi All
    Purchase order unable to close due to asset being capitalised and captured in last FY.
    We are getting the below error message.
    You cannot post acquisitions to asset 125782
    Message no. AA394
    Diagnosis
    You want to post an acquisition to this asset. However, according to depreciation key Z620 that was used, acquisition postings are only possible in the year of the initial acquisition or of the capitalization date.
    Procedure
    Check the asset number, the asset value date and the transaction type. You have to create sub-numbers for subsequent acquisitions using this depreciation key. However, these sub-numbers cannot adopt their depreciation start date from the main asset number.
    Please help us to resolve the issue and how to close the Purchase order.

    Hi,
    Please notice that error AA394 may be displayed correctly due to customizing settings of the depreciation key in transaction AFAMA when setting field XNAZUG (Acq.only allowed in capitalization year)  > YES                                                                               
    The only workaround  is to change your settings regarding field 'Acquisition only allowed in capitalization year'   > NO                                                                               
    Also have a look at SAP Note No. 211283 to understand how the flag operates.  
    I hope this helps to clarify.
    Kind regards,
    Brigitte

Maybe you are looking for

  • Suddenly unable to delete files from within the Dock

    I got my iMac about 2 months ago, and I'm pretty sure I was always able to drag a file (or folder) from, say, the Downloads stack directly to the Trash without having to open Downloads in Finder. For some reason it doesn't work any more, and I have t

  • ALV Grid output in background Job

    Hello everyone, Can someonen plz tell me if I execute my report (with Grid ALV Display) in background (sy-batch not initial ) , will the ALV Grid be displayed ? If no, then in order to show success do I have to 'WRITE' the success message ? Thanks

  • I want to block my ipad

    i want to block my ipad as it is robbed

  • Proposal.:.Multiple Purchase Unit of Measure and pricing

    The objective of this message is to start a discussion around procurement unit of measure and pricing. Currently, some of our clients are facing the following limitation: - They stock an item in a specific unit of measure (let say metre) - They buy i

  • Locate a photo's 'album'?

    My iPhoto library is gradually expanding and at times I forgot which album a photo is in, because some photos of mine belongs to different albums! I have some albums used primarily for 'theme-focused' photos. For example, a photo could be in both Oce