CO_Order Archiving

We need to remove some internal orders which were prematurely created for our new fiscal year but will not be used after all due to changes to our chart of accounts paradigm. The obvious way to do this is to close and archive them off the system, and we have been attempting to simulate this processing in our development system prior to trying in our production system. The relevant archive object is CO_ORDER.
The internal order we are working with is closed, but is not picked up by the archive process. The archive process is configured that it doesn't require the order type of this order to remain on the system for any length of time after being closed. The order has no financial document postings, no PO's, no PR's.
Does anyone have any suggestions for determining why the order is being dropped (excluded) from the archive? I am new to archiving and do not know how to approach this problem.
Thank you,
Bob Unger

Hi Bob,
When there is no status I0013 for the internal order in table JEST, it means that Deletion Indicator (DLT) is not set for the order. To be able to archive internal orders the deletion indicator flag has to be set. The preprocessing program RKOREO01 is used to set the deletion indicator for the internal orders. You can access the preprocessing program via TA: SARA.
Your steps to archive CO_ORDER has to be as follows
1. Set Deletion Flag and Deletion Indicator by running preprocessing program available for CO_ORDER via SARA
2. Run the archiving job
Note: Deletion flag need to be set before you can set Deletion Indicator.
Refer the following link (SAP Help) for more details on archiving CO_ORDER
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/ae/bb963457889b37e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Samanjay

Similar Messages

There is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER archiving obj

Dear Experts,
I am facing issue for CO_ORDER archiving object. I am getting error saying like
" there is still a purchase order commitment for ORD 200060" and
"order 200060 still has at least one purchase order that you need to do".
screen shot attached for reference
so Please help me to solve this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Ningappa S M

Hello Manju Sir,
Now that issue setting of deletion indicator is got successful. I mean I set residence time 1 as 0 and I tried to archive and I got successful. but I am facing the issue saying " there is still a purchase order commitment" , "there is a still Purchase requisition assigned to order" and
"still has at least one purchase order that you need to delete" etc for all orders when i set residence time 1 as 39 months (even i tried by setting the residence time 1 as zero i am getting the same error messages) and residence time 2 as 0. for these orders deletion flag itself is not getting set. so please help me for this.
Thanks,
Ningappa

Reg: CO_ORDER Archiving

Dear All,
For Archiving using CO_ORDER Object, the Write Program of it doesnot have the Date/Year Field.
But, we need to archive only those document from 1998 to 2006. the rest should not be archived.
How can this restriction be included while archiving ?
Any clues ???
Regards,
Deepu.k

Hi Deepu,
Have you tried to limit by customizing the residence time in application specific customizing?
If you set the appropriate residence time in application specific customizing, then you need not limit the time period in the write program variant.
refer this for CO_ORDER application specific customizing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/ae/bb963457889b37e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Thanks,
Naveen

CO_Order cannot be archived

We have CO_Order that have the delete indicator set under the old SAP
version 3.1. These orders have status DLT.
We have since moved to version 4.7, and would like to actually archive
these orders, but the system will not perform the archive for these
orders.
The system kept giving us message that the order is flagged
as "deleted" (and it has been "deleted" for a long time, because we
upgraded from version 3.1 to 4.7 in 2004), so we should be able to
archive these. But these orders just don't get archived.
To be clear, the question is: how do we archive CO_Order under version
4.7, when the deletion indicator has been set under version 3.1?
Any ideas on how we can fix/continue with this is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Suri

Hello,
If residence time 2 is 1 month, have you waited 1 month since setting the delete indicator before running the archive write job?
Here is an example archiving scenario:
residence time 1 = 1 month
residence time 2 = 1 month
You would first need to run the pre-processing job to set the deletion flag.
You then need to wait 1 month and run the pre-processing job AGAIN, to set the deletion indicator.
You would then need to wait 1 month before running the archive write job.
SAP Help Text on this:
Checks for Internal Orders (CO-OM-OPA)
Because the create archive program only selects orders that can be deleted, the criteria for deleting data is the same as for archiving data.
Internal orders have a deletion flag and a deletion indicator. Both are set by task functions.
Setting and deleting the deletion flag
You activate or reset the deletion flag for an internal order in the master data maintenance. If you set the deletion flag, the system checks whether the order can be deleted. Normally, you can only set the deletion flag if the order balance is zero. The following are exceptions:
Statistical orders
Orders for which the settlement profile is set up so that the actual costs are not to be settled or do not require settlement.
Setting the deletion indicator
Before you can set the deletion indicator, you need to set the delete flag. Residence time one must also have expired. You cannot reverse the deletion indicator once it is set.
You can set both the deletion flag and the deletion indicator in mass processing. In the Internal Orders menu, choose Tools ® Archiving ® Orders and then Preparation.
This process only archives orders for which the deletion indicator is set and for which residence time two has expired.
Both the residence times are part of the order type. You can change them in the implementation guide for internal orders by choosing Order Master Data ® Define Order Types.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Karin Tillotson

Tables not archived with CO_ORDER

Hi All,
CO_ORDER is the archiving object for archiving orders in CO
The following tables though they are listed in DB15 transaction are not getting archived with CO_ORDER but the table entries are deleted while running the delete program pertaining to CO_ORDER. These tables however are getting archived and deleted with CO_ITEM archiving object with object type ORD
The list of tables that are getting deleted are COBK,COBK_INDX,COEJ,COEJL,COEJR,COEP,COEPB,COEPL,COEPR.
If CO_ORDER object alone has to be archived, then these tables will not get archived but will be directly deleted.
Is there any sequence in archiving CO_ITEM and CO_ORDER?
Any pointers to the same will be helpful.

Hi,
Refer to the following note and its referenced corresponding notes for further information into this issue.
Note: 110923 Archives cannot be read or accessed
In addition, also refer to the following note that provides further clarity on the use of archiving and analysis (especially the information in relation to Programs RARCCOA1, RARCCOA2)
Note: 138688 Archiving/Controlling: table analysis
If this is an issue that the archive files for CO_ORDER are no longer available (Deleted), then please refer to the following information:
If you run the Analysis Program RKAARCS1 and the selection for the archive files shows a 'lightning bolt' this means the files are not accessible.
You can then check the archive information structures for CO_ORDER and if they are built. If they are not built there will be a 'red light' which indicates to build the structure via transaction SARI and Status. This is not possible if the Archive Files are not available though.
You will either have to restore the Archive files or Create a new Archive file. Care should be taken when you create Archive files that they are stored in a secure location and backed up on a seperate schedule than your normal backup.
I hope this information helps you get the results you are seeking.
Kind Regards,
Brendan
Edited by: Brendan O'Brien on Sep 2, 2008 2:21 PM

Should object CO_PROCESS be archived?

Hi gurus,
I need to archive my whole company codes transaction data for the previous years.
Please guide me should CO_PROCESS be archived.
As per my knowledge, EC_PCA_ITM, COPA2_xxxx, CO_ITEM, CO_COPC, CO_ORDER and CO_TOTAL should be archived.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Regards,
Devang

Hi,
Please, consult 138688 note for this issue.
Regards,
Eli

Help on archiving object - table AUFK

hi,
for table AUFK i would like to perform a test archiving scenario. currently i'm at the identifying the archiving object stage.
From TAANA i was able to see the data distribution across the order categories and its entries as below
Order category    entries
1                           1.844.505
20                           88.642
30                         80.473
10                       14.558
3                          1
DB15 has following archiving objects
CO_ORDER
PM_ORDER
PP_ORDER
PR_ORDER
PS_PROJECT
Can you please help me out find out the right archiving object in these, I'm at SE16 but not getting a clue to find out how the order category is linked to this object.
Please suggest.

thanks

Reg : Archiving of Internal Order

Hai Friends I am working on Archiving of Control Orders(Internal Orders) using KO02.
Archiving can be done only when deletion flag is set for Internal Order.
My issue is I want to set deletion flag for the Internal Order without going into the TCode KO02
and setting deletion flag.
Is there any other option for doing this.....

unless i am very much mistaken, internal orders follow the same algorithms as service orders or production orders, so you can set the deletion mark/flag using the archiving preproc. tx. SARA -> CO_ORDER -> PREPROC -> create variant. check whether you have to set times of residence in the configuration of the order type.

Sale order canu2019t be archived u2013 Open PO items exists

Hi all
While doing sale order archive, it says it has open PO items. But the PO line items and relevant PR line items are deleted. Still canu2019t archive the sale order. Pls guideu2026
Thanks in advance
ARAS

Hi
Can u send us the exact Error message??
Ravi.

Follow-up to archived thread "Another Error (I think) In the 12.1 New Features Guide"

I hoped to be able to add a reply to the most recent reply on March 8 in the "Another Error (I think) In the 12.1 New Features Guide" thread (https://community.oracle.com/thread/3526588), but since that thread has been archived, I am doing what was suggested elsewhere: create a new thread referencing the old one. My reply is:
Thank you for your explanation about preferring PDF over HTML. That is perfectly fine and understandable. Also, we very much appreciate your documentation feedback in this forum, and encourage you to continue to report any issues here.
I apologize for not replying much sooner. I either didn't get or overlooked an original notification about "Recent activity" after your reply; otherwise, I would have replied then.

Thanks for that comment. I have sent a pointer to it to the writer for that book. Note that with the New Features Guide, most of the content is automatically drawn from an internal system that tracks projects and features; so if a change is needed, the writer will notify the owner of that content (typically a developer or a product manager) to investigate and (if necessary) modify the underlying data, after which the changed information will be picked up for a future revision of the book.
Also, while anyone is welcome to enter documentation comments in this forum, another option that may be more convenient for comments on specific sections is the Reader Comment area at the bottom of each HTML page (such as http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16655_01/server.121/e17906/chapter1.htm#NEWFT495 for the page containing Section 1.5.9.8). Any comments entered in a Reader Comment area go to someone in our documentation production group, who forwards them to the appropriate writers.
However, if a comment involves multiple HTML pages or books, or if you want the matter to be in a public forum for visibility and searchability, posting in this forum is a good option.

Issue MM PO Archiving

Hello all,
we had an issue in archiving Purchase Orders.
Frist of all, we have a large number of open purchase orders. Means that the "delivery complete" flag is missing and the "final invoice" flag is missing.
These PO´s cant be deleted.
So these flags have to be set. We created a report which uses ME22N and sets those flags. After this, our issue appeared.
Unfortenally many purchase orders created new messages and send them directly to the vendor. Had a lot of trouble with this.
How can this happen? Why is this flag a indicator for message determination?
How can i prevent this?
I coud set the flags directly on the DB, but our company doesn´t want to make updates direclty on db.
Any ideas?
thanks for help

Hi Christian,
Other idea. If you don't want to change any customizing, you can create your own Outputs routine numbers in VOFM to rule this requirement. In SPRO/ Mat.managament / purchasing / messages / output control / accesses sequence, you can set it and avoid to create the message. See SAP Note 39462 - Expand field catalog in message determination for purchasing to create a new field (for instance, date of PO). You can set a condition to set SY-SUBRC = 4 (ie: output not created) if the difference in days is greater than n days.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

How can I disable iMessages from archiving messages and attachments?

I noticed while browsing ~/Library\Messages/ that iMessages has been archiving my messages (Archive folder) and saving attachments (in a separate Attachment folder). Under the settings for iMessages on OS X 10.8.2 Mountain Lion, I don't see any options to disable this. The only thing close to that is already unchecked: Save history when conversations are closed.
Any ideas why iMessages is saving all this information? How do I disable it? My concern is that it's going to keep accumulating data overtime. I don't want to keep having to go back in there and delete those two folders constantly.

Hi,
This somewhat date back to the way iChat's Saved Chats were once Stored.
At iChat 5 (in Snow Leopard) you could choose to see the last chat - (when opening an new chat with a person you had chatted with before) or parts of the Last Chat in terms of the Last so many IMs.
Example Pic of iChat 5's Prefs
Since then the management choices of the Save Chats has changed in both iChat 6 and Messages.
Messages stores Chats two ways if they are iMessages.
You can elect to Save them in Messages > Preferences > Messages.
It also store the chat.db and other databases items which includes the Attachment items
The chat.db is the bit that fill in the "history" if you iMessage the same person even if you are not saving the Chat in a formal sense in the App's Preferences.
This is irrespective if your delete the Conversation from the Messages main window.
How big these Databases get obviously depends on your iMessages usage.
Striker's link seems to be about a similar issue on an iPhone (I presume it transfers to other iOS devices) but I am not sure that it is relevant in this situation.
Edit.
I should have been clear that you cannot change the database behaviour.
9:49 pm Sunday; October 6, 2013
 iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Mountain Lion 10.8.4)
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
 Mac OS X (10.6.8),
 Couple of iPhones and an iPad
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously
Message was edited by: Ralph Johns (UK)

How do I manually archive 1 redo log at a time?

The database is configured in archive mode, but automatic archiving is turned off.
For both Oracle 901 and 920 on Windows, when I try to manually archive a single redo log, the database
archives as many logs as it can up to the log just before the current log:
For example:
SQL> select * from v$log order by sequence#;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIM
1 1 14 104857600 1 NO INACTIVE 424246 19-JAN-05
2 1 15 104857600 1 NO INACTIVE 425087 28-MAR-05
3 1 16 104857600 1 NO INACTIVE 425088 28-MAR-05
4 1 17 512000 1 NO INACTIVE 425092 28-MAR-05
5 1 18 512000 1 NO INACTIVE 425100 28-MAR-05
6 1 19 512000 1 NO CURRENT 425102 28-MAR-05
6 rows selected.
SQL> alter system archive log next;
System altered.
SQL> select * from v$log order by sequence#;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIM
1 1 14 104857600 1 YES INACTIVE 424246 19-JAN-05
2 1 15 104857600 1 YES INACTIVE 425087 28-MAR-05
3 1 16 104857600 1 YES INACTIVE 425088 28-MAR-05
4 1 17 512000 1 YES INACTIVE 425092 28-MAR-05
5 1 18 512000 1 NO INACTIVE 425100 28-MAR-05
6 1 19 512000 1 NO CURRENT 425102 28-MAR-05
See - instead of only 1 log being archive, 4 of them were. Oracle behaves the same way if I use the "sequence" option:
SQL> select * from v$log order by sequence#;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIM
1 1 14 104857600 1 NO INACTIVE 424246 19-JAN-05
2 1 15 104857600 1 NO INACTIVE 425087 28-MAR-05
3 1 16 104857600 1 NO INACTIVE 425088 28-MAR-05
4 1 17 512000 1 NO INACTIVE 425092 28-MAR-05
5 1 18 512000 1 NO INACTIVE 425100 28-MAR-05
6 1 19 512000 1 NO CURRENT 425102 28-MAR-05
6 rows selected.
SQL> alter system archive log next;
System altered.
SQL> select * from v$log order by sequence#;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIM
1 1 14 104857600 1 YES INACTIVE 424246 19-JAN-05
2 1 15 104857600 1 YES INACTIVE 425087 28-MAR-05
3 1 16 104857600 1 YES INACTIVE 425088 28-MAR-05
4 1 17 512000 1 YES INACTIVE 425092 28-MAR-05
5 1 18 512000 1 NO INACTIVE 425100 28-MAR-05
6 1 19 512000 1 NO CURRENT 425102 28-MAR-05
Is there some default system configuration property telling Oracle to archive as many logs as it can?
Thanks,
DGR

Thanks Yoann (and Syed Jaffar Jaffar Hussain too),
but I don't have a problem finding the group to archive or executing the alter system archive log command.
My problem is that Oracle doesn't work as I expect it.
This comes from the Oracle 9.2 online doc:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96540/statements_23a.htm#2053642
"Specify SEQUENCE to manually archive the online redo log file group identified by the log sequence number integer in the specified thread."
This implies that Oracle will only archive the log group identified by the log sequence number I specify in the alter system archive log sequence statement. However, Oracle is archiving almost all of the log groups (see my first post for an example).
This appears to be a bug, unless there is some other system parameter that is configured (by default) to allow Oracle to archive as many log groups as possible.
As to the reason why - it is an application requirement. The Oracle db must be in archive mode, automatic archiving must be disabled and the application must control online redo log archiving.
DGR

Archiving cds and why do i need id3 tags

here comes another one of those questions looking at which codec to use to store music.....i also have tag questions.....
i'm about to (re-)rip my cd collection and looking at some info re codecs and id3 tags
now.....i believe i understand the benefits of alac (lower file sizes, keeping id3 tags, lossless compression) v wav(no compression)
however (and for some out there) if we just entertain the fact that wav may have some minute benefit for me depending on my questions and answers given.....and yes i know wav and alac will sound the same to the human ear - i accept that as a given of lossless compression ......
points i'd like to outline:
i am looking to rip my cds, firstly and mostly, for an archiving purpose!! purpose numero uno!!
i could well want to re-create cds with these archived records in the future
size of files is of no concern to me at all
i'm using a mac nowadays
i will convert most of these files, where needed, to use with a portable music player (i'm not bothered with having, say a wav file and then also converting and having an alac file, as crazy as that sounds)
this is where i ask for info re the benefits of embedded tags that are found in alac:
are these tags that important?
where do they come into play in ripping and later converting music?
are these uses just bells and whistles that have no benefit to my needs?
if i rip cds to wav (or aiff), say, using itunes, will cd info and track listings be available on the downloading database (eg itunes) to name these wav files?
if i then ensure these song files are kept under the album's folder, have i just done what tags do? surely not. that is all i have needed in the past.
this is where i feel i may be really missing what id tags (can) do
are tags more than just managing song files and where they belong and where they have come from?
is it just a convenience of not personally managing your song files (as per previous paragraph)?
(in the past i had ripped cds to mp3 codec. i think i used "cd rip" or something like that on my pc.
my mp3 files were individually named and sorted and kept under album folders under artist name folders.
apart form the very odd occasion all track and album info i needed was found on a database that was attached to the ripping software.
i never had a problem managing/maintaining these files and folders.)
i welcome some enlightenment on some of my questions above and other info that may be relevant
and yes, i understand that music will sound the same as a wav file or alac file - but humour me re using wav and tell me why i need id3 tags
i guess the crux of it is:
why do i need id3 tags?
does my managing of my song file in the album folder do what tags do?
what problems/shortcomings/headaches may i encounter by not having those tags if i use wav as opposed to alac?
what do i not know about these little buggers?
what codec is best for my purpose of archiving and re creating of cds (for playing in cd players)
thanks in advance for your input and any clarity that i may experience through this
peter t
excuse my long windedness (i have spent some time editing this entry)

Crows2012 wrote:
as mentioned earlier if i just have songs (wav) in album folders, when i import these albums into itunes, do you know if these will come up under AN album with their file names purely using my filename setup (but with no artwork)?
Yes, iTunes will read the filename, such as "Track 1" or something else and display it. But nothing else. No Album or Artist.
so the tracks will remain grouped as an album based on their initial folder and the albums and tracks as per file name?
Crows2012 wrote:
also, does aiff have limitations (apart from the full size of the file)?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. For all practical purposes AIFF and WAV are exactly the same thing. They're just file containers.
i thought that i had read somewhere that aiff tags could run into some issues with its tags - ie may not always be transferred 100% accurately with certain players (or hardware maybe)
Crows2012 wrote:
and how do these codecs work re-creating an album for the purposes of playing in a cd player? - this is a crucial question for the purpose of my archiving/backup of CDs THEMSELVES
That's actually going to depend on what burning software you use. Once you rip the tracks to whatever file container you choose (WAV/AIFF/ALAC) you'll never really exactly re-create the album. But for archiving purposes all three file containers will do what you want, which is to create a lossless archive. AIFF has the advantage of supporting embedded ID3, which ALAC has the additional advantage of the files also being about half the size of AIFF/WAV files.
i was thinking that maybe wav was able to recreate an album (in effect duplicate one) if my cd was lost or damaged in the future. i was thinking this IF when ripping to wav everything is unchanged (unless there is other data on the original cd). and maybe only possible with wav. the purpose for this would be to play recreated cds on my cd player
any idea on this one?
(i havent looked too thoroughly on this angle but i'll keep googling on this one)
much appreciate all info thus far
peter t

Time Machine no longer backs up after archive & install

I have just had something mysterious happen to my Macbook - it spontaneously shut down, then wouldn't restart past a gray screen with Apple logo. After trying every troubleshooting page I could find, I ended up doing an archive and (re)install of Leopard on my hard drive. (btw, I ran the Disk Utility hard drive diagnostic, and it said the HD is fine, though I'm skeptical because it's making new noises I've never heard before.)
I finished that install, restarted, everything seemed fine, and I re-connected the external hard drive that had been used for my Time Machine backups before. Now, every time it attempts to back up, it's stuck on "preparing" for 30 minutes, then starts copying SLOWLY and the progress bar says "6 KB of 10 GB." Well, I have a lot more than 10 GB to back up. Then the process halts and I get an error message: "Unable to complete backup. An error occurred while copying files to the backup volume." And I can't get any more specific information about the error - can't find a log file or anything.
I know that there's a troubleshooting article about Time Machine issues with only backing up 10 GB, but mine doesn't even get that far, and besides, this is not my first Time Machine backup - I have no other external drive big enough to transfer my older data to while I reformat this drive as the support article suggests.
I was thinking that perhaps a system setting got messed up somehow and that maybe I should just forget this archive & install thing I did and instead do a fresh erase & install on my Macbook hard drive and then restore from Time Machine's old backup (a day or so before my Macbook started acting weird). But 1. would that make a difference? And 2. if Leopard gives me an error while backing up in Time Machine, what if I do the erase & install and I get an error trying to restore from Time Machine? That would be a nightmare.
My Macbook has always been so reliable - I'm very confused about what's going on! Any help would be appreciated.

Hmm; the external drive had no errors, according to Disk Utility.
Here are the time machine logs from Console:
1/13/08 12:14:47 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.backupd[301]) Exited abnormally: Bus error
1/13/08 1:10:28 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.backupd[430]) Exited abnormally: Bus error
1/13/08 2:21:23 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.backupd[519]) Exited abnormally: Bus error
1/13/08 4:12:57 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.backupd[612]) Exited abnormally: Bus error
1/13/08 5:22:59 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.backupd[818]) Exited abnormally: Bus error
1/13/08 6:24:00 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.backupd[915]) Exited abnormally: Bus error
1/13/08 7:24:52 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.backupd[1012]) Exited abnormally: Bus error
Also, I tried to repair permissions on my internal drive and I got the following error messages:
Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/load_hdi" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DiskManagement.framework/Versions/A/Resources /DiskManagementTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DesktopServicesPriv.framework/Versions/A/Reso urces/Locum" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Install.framework/Versions/A/Resources/runner " has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/readconf ig" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/writecon fig" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/authopen" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.
Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAg ent" has been modified and will not be repaired.

CO_Order Archiving

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for