Comment and quote issue

I found a bug in ODP.NET but I wasn't able to find a right place to submit it so I describe it here.
Not looking for a workaround. I just hope it will be fixed in the next release.
If a Query throw the ODP.NET Provider has parameters and contains an odd number of single quote characters in a comment you will get an error:
ORA-01008: not all variables bound
----- Here a code sample to reproduce the issue:
        private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
            string badCmdText = @"
                -- with a single quote in the comment the command dosn't work
                INSERT INTO TestTable ( colsA, colsB, colsC )
                VALUES     ('aa', :b, :c )";
            string goodCmdText = @"
                -- with a single quote in the comment the command dosn't work
                -- with a couple it's ok
                 INSERT INTO TestTable ( colsA, colsB, colsC )
                VALUES     ('aa', :b, :c )";
            var providerName = "Oracle.DataAccess.Client";
            using (var cn = DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(providerName).CreateConnection()) {
                cn.ConnectionString = "USER ID=YourUserId;PASSWORD=YourPassword;DATA SOURCE=YourServerName";
                cn.Open();
                using (var cmd = cn.CreateCommand()) {
                    cmd.CommandText = badCmdText;
                    //cmd.CommandText = goodCmdText;
                    var par = cmd.CreateParameter();
                    par.ParameterName = "b";
                    par.Value = "bb";
                    cmd.Parameters.Add(par);
                    par = cmd.CreateParameter();
                    par.ParameterName = "c";
                    par.Value = "cc";
                    cmd.Parameters.Add(par);
                    try {
                        var reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();
                        reader.Close();
                        MessageBox.Show("Command OK","Completed",MessageBoxButtons.OK,MessageBoxIcon.Information);
                    catch (Exception ex) {
                        MessageBox.Show(ex.Message,"Error",MessageBoxButtons.OK,MessageBoxIcon.Error);

I was searching for an answer FOREVER and finally found it (at least for me). If you have PDFlyer, that is the source of the problem. Easy fix:
Launch Adobe X.
Click Tools on the right side of the screen.
Click on PDFlyer.
Click Set Options.
Click Start up.
Unclick Restore standard toolbars on start up.
Close Adobe X and reopen.
Hope that helps!

Similar Messages

  • BPM 11G comments and file attachments issue on human tasks

    Hi all,
    We have used JDeveloper 11G and SOA suite 11G + BPM (with PS1,PS2) to create and deploy a simple BPM process. The process consists of two swim-lanes ( Business Analyst and Snr Executive). The BA swim-lane has a human task which which initiates the process and the second swim-lane (SE) has a voting task. Both forms were auto generated.
    ------ Process steps ----
    step 1. The initiator of the process( Business analyst) submits a document and adds comments on the form. (1st swim lane)
    step 2. The task is received by the Snr Executive group and they need to accept or reject the document.
    step 3. If any of the Snr Execs rejects the document, the process flow goes back to the Business analyst(the requester or initiator) for review.
    (the voting group is able to share comments and the file attachments).
    step 4. The business analyst receives a task on her list. This task list should have the comments made by the Snr Execs who rejected the document. ---This is where we are having a problem. The business Analyst, receives the task, but the document and comments are not updated. This still shows the original document and comments, she sent when initiating the process.
    We have opened a SR with My Oracle support and it was suggested we apply a hot fix 9958661, which was done (see output below). Unfortunately this did not solve the problem.
    Questions:
    1. Is the default behavior of BPM 11G ?
    2. How can we change this behavior to do what we want ?
    ---------------------------------------opatch update output -----------------------------------------------------------
    ApplySession adding interim patch '9958661' to inventory
    Verifying the update...
    Inventory check OK: Patch ID 9958661 is registered in Oracle Home inventory with proper meta-data.
    Files check OK: Files from Patch ID 9958661 are present in Oracle Home.
    The local system has been patched and can be restarted
    I any suggestions would be welcome.
    Thanks
    Mocheche

    Ok, this is what i did:
    - I have a Process Data Object called CustomComments with just 1 attribute called comments.
    - I have added that object to my user screens (adf page)
    - Changed its columns att to 65 and rows to 8 (i chose that layout)
    - Used a tableLayout to add an icon next to this text area to allow the user to add comments:
    <af:commandImageLink shortDesc="addCommentImage" id="addCommentImage" partialSubmit="true" icon="/hw_images/new_ena.png">
         <af:clientListener method="myFunction" type="click"/>
         <af:clientAttribute name="attributeName" value="attributeValue"/>
    </af:commandImageLink>
    I use that clientAttribute to send the logged user to the javascipt.
    - I added this after the af:document on top of the page to make the customComments readonly to the user (you need to do it here because if you set it in the properties the element is not updated later), so the user has to use the button i put to add comments:
    <f:facet name="metaContainer">
         <f:facet name="metaContainer">
         <af:resource type="javascript">
              function readOnly(){
                   var comms = document.getElementById("it1::content");
                   comms.setAttribute("readOnly","true")
         </af:resource>
    </f:facet>
    <af:clientListener method="readOnly" type="load"/>
    - Somewhere i added the javascript the commandLink calls:
    <trh:script id="myScripts">
         function addComment(evt){
              var commentArea = document.getElementById("it1::content");
    var user = evt.getSource().getProperty("user");
    var comm = prompt("Please enter your comment: ","");
              if (comm != null) {
                   if (comm != ""){
                        if (commentArea.value !=""){commentArea.value = commentArea.value + "\n"}
                        commentArea.value = commentArea.value + "user.value" + " : " + comm;
    </trh:script>
    After all this, you have an object that carries the comments from one screen (UI project) to another and is updated each time.
    I know it may not be the perfect solution and that it could be improved a lot, but so far it does what i need so i use it.
    If there is anything i wasnt clear enough, please let me know. Hope this helps.

  • Issues with Commenting and Signing

    I'm using the latest update of version 10. When I have a document that has comments and I use the sign tool and then it saves the document the comments disapear. I've tried just about everything I can think of but it seems like after you use the sign feature it wipes all the comments and sticky notes out. Any ideas or fixes for this?
    Thank you in advance!

    This can be done using the Sign pane without having to print the PDF/scanning pages after adding comments/signatures.
    You can add text comments using the 'Add text' tool from Sign pane, add your signature using the 'Place signature' option where you can choose from 3 different signing options (typewritten signature, hand-drawn signature or importing signature from an image which can be a scanned image of your signature). After one person has added his comments and signature, you can choose to "finalize" the PDF which flattens the PDF so that the comments/signature of this person cannnot be modified by others. The next person can now add his comments/signatures on this PDF again. After all people are done with signing, you can attach the final PDF to your accounting program. This should work seamlessly.
    Hope that helps!

  • Execution times and other issues in changing TextEdit documents

    (HNY -- back to terrorize everyone with off-the-wall questions)
    --This relates to other questions I've asked recently, but that may be neither here nor there.
    --Basically, I want to change a specific character in an open TextEdit document, in text that can be pretty lengthy. But I don't want pre-existing formatting of the text to change.
    --For test purposes the front TextEdit document is simply an unbroken string of letters (say, all "q's") ranging in number from 5 and upwards. Following are some of the results I've gotten:
    --1) Using a do shell script routine (below), the execution is very fast, well under 0.1 second for changing 250 q's to e's and changing the front document. The problem is that the formatting of the first character becomes the formatting for the entire string (in fact, for the entire document if there is subsequent text). So that doesn't meet my needs, although I certainly like the speed.
    --SCRIPT 1
    tell application "TextEdit"
    set T to text of front document
    set Tnew to do shell script "echo " & quoted form of T & " | sed 's/q/e/g'"
    set text of front document to Tnew
    end tell
    --END SCRIPT 1
    --The only practical way I've found to change a character AND maintain formatting is the "set every character where it is "q" to "e"" routine (below). But, for long text, I've run into a serious execution speed problem. For example, if the string consists of 10 q's, the script executes in about 0.03 second. If the string is 40 characters, the execution is 0.14 second, a roughly linear increase. If the string is 100 characters, the execution is 2.00 seconds, which doesn't correlate to a linear increase at all. And if the string is 250 characters, I'm looking at 70 seconds. At some point, increasing the number of string characters leads to a timeout or stall. One interesting aspect of this is that, if only the last 4 characters (example) of the 250-character string are "q", then the execution time is again very quick.
    --SCRIPT 2
    tell application "TextEdit"
    set T to text of front document
    tell text of front document
    set every character where it is "q" to "e"
    end tell
    end tell
    --END SCRIPT 2
    --Any insight into this issue (or workaround) will be appreciated.
    --In the real world, I most often encounter the issue when trying to deal with spaces in long text, which can be numerous.

    OK, Camelot, helpful but maddening. Based on your response. I elected to look at this some more, even though I'm stuck with TextEdit on this project. Here's what I found, not necessarily in the order I did things:
    1) I ran your "repeat" script on my usual machine (2.7 PPC with 10.4.6)) and was surprised to consisently get about 4.25 seconds -- I didn't think it should matter, but I happened to run it with Script Debugger.
    2) Then, curious as to what a slower processor speed would do, I ran it at ancient history speed -- a 7500 souped up to 700 MHz. On a 10.4.6 partition, the execution time was about 17 seconds, but on a 10.3.6 partition it was only about 9.5 seconds. (The other complication with this older machine is that it uses XPostFacto to accommodate OS X.) And I don't have Script Debugger for 10.3.x, so I ran the script in Script Editor on that partition.
    3) That got me wondering about Script Editor vs. Script Debugger, so (using 10.4.6) I ran the script on both the old machine and my (fast) usual machine using Script Editor. On the old machine, it was somewhat faster at about 14 seconds. But, surprise!, on the current machine it took twice as long at 8.6 seconds. The story doesn't end here.
    (BTW, I added a "ticks" routine to the script, so the method of measuring time should be consistent. And I've been copying and pasting the script to the various editors, so there shouldn't be any inconsistencies with it. I've consistently used a 250-character unbroken string of the target in a TextEdit document.)
    4) Mixed in with all these trials, I wrote a script to get a list of offsets of all the target characters; it can be configured to change the characters or not. But I found some intriguing SE vs. SD differences there also. In tests on the fast machine, running the script simply to get the offset list (without making any changes), the list is generated in under a second -- but sometimes barely so. The surprise was that SE ran it in about half the time as SD. although SD was about twice as fast with a script that called for changes. Go figure.
    5) Since getting the offset list is pretty fast in either case, I was hoping to think up some innovative way of using the offset list to make changes in the document more quickly. But running a repeat routine with the list simply isn't innovative, and the result is roughly what I get with your repeat script coupled with an added fraction of a second for generating the list. Changing each character as each offset is generated also yields about the same result.
    My conclusion from all this is that the very fast approaches (which lose formatting) are changing the characters globally, not one at a time as occurs visibly with techniques where the formatting isn't lost. I don't know what to make of SE vs. SD, but I repeated the runs several times in each editor, with consistent results.
    Finally, while writing the offset list script, I encountered a couple AS issues that I've seen several times in the past (having nothing specifically to do with this topic), but I'll present that as a new post.
    Thanks for your comments and any others will be welcome.

  • Shared Review comment server setup issues

    I've been having some issues setting up a comment server/repository for Shared Reviews in Acrobat 8 (for our all-Mac network). I've done extensive research on how to set up a Network Folder and a WebDAV folder (since those are the only two supported methods in Acrobat 8).
    - For the Network Folder setup, I created a folder on one of the machines on our network and shared it using SMB. When specifying that location (using smb://IPAddress/Folder/), Acrobat either 1) brings up a login screen, into which I enter the proper credentials, and after pressing OK, it says the connection could not be made, or 2) it verifies the shared folder location, but when I make comments and then choose Publish Comments, a red box appears saying something to the effect of "cannot access IPAddress, will keep trying."
    - I also tried using WebDAV. Solutions I found online mostly consisted of using the Terminal to access system files and entering numerous lines of code. I pretty much had to learn about WebDAV from scratch today in order to get the Shared Reviews process set up, but I feel like there is something I'm missing regording its implementation.
    I suppose this post can be boiled down to three questions:
    1) What is the best way to set up a Shared Review system, and how can it be done in the simplest manner possible?
    2) What am I missing from my knowledge of Network Folders and WebDAV folders in this regard?
    3) Would functionality be benefited by simply upgrading to Acrobat X?
    Thank you all in advance for your responses and help. If there is any more information required in order to provide a solution, please let me know.

    The roundcube db schema needs to setup manually. See /usr/share/webapps/roundcube/INSTALL
    Also, from your /etc/webapps/postfixadmin/config.inc.php:
    $CONF['domain_path'] = 'NO';
    $CONF['domain_in_mailbox'] = 'YES';
    $CONF['maildir_name_hook'] = 'NO';
    ..which results in /var/mail/vmail/[email protected]
    From your dovecot.conf
    mail_home = /var/mail/vmail/%d/%u
    ...which results in /var/mail/vmail/domain.com/user
    That doesn't fit together.

  • SQL Loader and whitespace issues

    Hello users,
    I've got an issue that I know is breaking based on a comments field, which allows nearly every type of character in it.
    Long story short, I'm trying to upload an Access table, turned to .csv file into Oracle via SQL Loader.
    I'm able to do it if I delete or set the COMMENTS column to null before doing so.
    If I try the option with the contents of this field populated, it blows up. I've got it terminated by a tilde in the control file, which the COMMENTS field does not contain at all, even with some 5.000+ records.
    However, people upon entering comments have put many carriage returns in there. I noticed once I export the data to text or csv, then open in Excel, it shows the column breaking and spilling over into fields it shouldn't, thereby causing the big problem.
    I've been searching but haven't found a way I can wrap these whitespaces or have SQL Loader ignore them.
    I can't use TERMINATED BY WHITESPACE in the SQL Loader control file because that will cause the field to break without all the comments and I can't use optionally enclosed by " because these people have also used " in the COMMENTS field.
    Do I have any option here, other than to brute force make an update query of some kind to manually populate the data? I can do that if I have to but i'd sure rather have all the data dump in via SQL Loader if I can.
    Thanks!

    Actually, it wasn't related to the size of the column. I made it like 3000, to hold 3000 characters, which was plenty.
    But I used
    PRESERVE BLANKS and then it worked fine!

  • Why Firefox 25.0 does not show Google ads and Facebook comments and likes. All other browsers do.

    I've just upgraded to FireFox 25.0 and I have issues viewing Google ads and Facebook comments and likes on my website (wellfitstyle.com). All other browsers show Google adds in the right sidebar and Facebook comments and likes under each post. Great number of people in Eastern Europe (where I am) use FireFox and I would like to know how this issue can be fixed.
    Tnx.

    Hi there,
    Starting in Firefox 23, if a secure page includes certain types of insecure content, Firefox blocks the insecure content and a shield icon will appear in the address bar. See this article for more information about the new mixed content blocker: [[How does content that isn't secure affect my safety?]]
    To temporarily allow the mixed content to be displayed:
    *Click the '''shield icon''' [[Image:Mixed Content Shield]] in the address bar and choose '''Disable Protection on This Page''' from the dropdown menu.
    [[Image:Fx23MixedContentBlocker]]
    To allow insecure content to be displayed in all secure pages, enter '''about:config''' in the address bar and double-click on this preference, to toggle it from true to false:
    '''security.mixed_content.block_active_content'''
    You can also use this add-on instead, to toggle the preference:
    *[https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/toggle-mixed-active-content/ Toggle Mixed active content] add-on
    You may want to do this only for the current session, then reset the preference back to "true" and check back with the site to see whether it's been fixed, since this is a global setting that exposes you on all sites, not just the one you care about.

  • Archiving Options for BPEL Instances, Comments and Attachments.

    Hi
    We have a SOA11g BPEL and Human Tasks custom application running for past one and half year, and we have lot of instances completed in the BPEL flow.
    Are they any default options in SOA Suite where the instances get archived after specific period? If not what are the options to archive the Completed instance and respective Comments and Attachments. And to view them when required from the BPM worklist application.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Hi,
    This somewhat date back to the way iChat's Saved Chats were once Stored.
    At iChat 5 (in Snow Leopard) you could choose to see the last chat - (when opening an new chat with a person you had chatted with before) or parts of the Last Chat in terms of the Last so many IMs.
    Example Pic of iChat 5's Prefs
    Since then the management choices of the Save Chats has changed in both iChat 6 and Messages.
    Messages stores Chats two ways if they are iMessages.
    You can elect to Save them in Messages > Preferences > Messages.
    It also store the chat.db and other databases items which includes the Attachment items
    The chat.db is the bit that fill in the "history" if you iMessage the same person even if you are not saving the Chat in a formal sense in the App's Preferences.
    This is irrespective if your delete the Conversation from the Messages main window.
    How big these Databases get obviously depends on your iMessages usage.
    Striker's link seems to be about a similar issue on an iPhone (I presume it transfers to other iOS devices) but I am not sure that it is relevant in this situation.
    Edit.
    I should have been clear that you cannot change the database behaviour.
    9:49 pm      Sunday; October 6, 2013
      iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Mountain Lion 10.8.4)
     G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
     MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
     Mac OS X (10.6.8),
     Couple of iPhones and an iPad
    "Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously
    Message was edited by: Ralph Johns (UK)

  • BDC and Performance Issue

    When performing a Call Transaction, is it better to use a synchronous or asynchronous update mode for a large number of records?  Right now, we have a BDC that is running on synchronous update but is taking forever to update. Sometimes it even causes system problems.
    I'm also looking into using a BAPI instead of the BDC. I think using a BAPI is preferable than a BDC.
    Comments and suggestions on these 2 issues  are highly appreciated.

    For many cases BDC is required to run in synchronous transaction,
    so the result will be able to be processed for further action ( for ex: to be displayed ).
    If possible, find an existing BAPI to replace the BDC.
    This will save time and maintenance effort.
    What kind of transaction are you using in the BDC ?

  • DC Won't Print Comments and Markups

    The Acrobat DC won't print the comments and markups
    All check boxes filled to print it and in print dialog too.
    It a poor version to top it off

    Hi Jim,
    I am sorry that you are experiencing this issue.
    Please follow the steps in this KB doc. Print comments | Acrobat, Reader
    Hopefully this will resolve your issue.
    In case if you still experience any issue, please let us know.
    Regards,
    Aadesh

  • Comments and edits cause "insufficient data"

    My co-workers and I use text edits and 'sticky notes' in Acrobat quite a lot. Some of us have started to run into an issue. After adding a few comments, and a few text edits, the document will go blank, and the error "Insufficient data for image" appears. The sticky notes are still there, but not the image. You cannot save the pdf with the comments. You're forced to close without saving, and then re-open the PDF and re-create all the sticky notes again.
    Does anyone have any light to shed on this? At first I thought it was a disconnecting issue--the PDFs live on our server--but it happens even when the computer is hardwired into the network. We're losing valuable time and causing tons of frustration.
    We're all using Macs running 10.8.2, and our Acrobat versions are 9.5.2.
    Thanks

    Are these PDFs that have been received via e-mail ?
    In doing the research on this error, it seems that there isn'nt any commonality except that these are PDFs being received either from the web or via e-mail. In one case the fella solved it my realizing that the image was 24/bit but had been saved as 8/bit (not sure if that was a source problem or transfer issue). But that might have been a one off solution.
    A lot of users were complaining about this problem after receiving a PDF via e-mail. Sending PDFs through e-mail wthout using an archive format such as "zip/WinRAR" can be problematic as some e-mail servers/clients assume that the PDF is text and munge it.
    Is this one user using the same e-mail client with the exact same settings as everyone else ?

  • FSRM and Quota's showing incorrect values

    Hi,
    I have set up folder quota's, and on one folder I have set it to 100GB.  This Quota shows as 99% used, but the actual folder in Explorer shows only as 28GB used.  What am I missing, or set up wrong, or is there a fix that needs to
    be applied? (I don't think my maths is that bad as I am pretty sure 28 is not 99% of 100.)
    Can anyone help or point me in the right direction.
    Thanks!
    Ben 

    I think I have a similar situation with my file cluster here, and this thread seems to be the closes I have found to what I'm seeing. For starters my file cluster servers up shares for my users, these shares are spread across 9 drives, and I have a folder
    quota on the share of each drive. For example:
    My username is jspatton, so my files are stored on
    \\people\i\jspatton the physical drive on the server is the K: drive and the root folder is I (for users I - J). This folder is shared out, and this folder is where the quota is applied. I have it set at 640GB hard, and I have 80GB available to grow into
    as needed. I think this is fairly common for most folks out there.
    My problem started about 5 days ago when one of my disks dropped to under 1gb of free space. I have a script that runs on my file servers that emails me when a drive drops below a certain threshold. I received that email 5 days ago, followed by a notification
    in SCOM that the disk was low. When I logon to the note the node and open Windows Explorer, I see that the free space is indeed under 1gb. When I use powershell to show me free-space I get a similar answer.
    The odd thing for me is disk management. Down below in the graphical portion it's reporting the disk as 678GB NTFS which is accurate in an attempt to resolve the quota issue I set the quota to max space. But up above it's reporting something different.
    V: 550gb (capacity) 830mb (free)
    The disk is basic, and is in fact 678GB here is the info from fsrm which is also interesting..and maybe i'm just missing something.
    Quota details V:
    Limit 678GB (Hard)
    Used 547GB (80%), Peak Usage: 547GB (80%) Peak Time 3:/16/2012 10:23PM
    Available 131GB
    Volume Details V:
    Capacity 550GB
    Hard quota allocation 678GB (123%)
    available 477 MB
    What have I done recently?
    I increased the quota to equal the total space of the disk.
    I disabled the quota and re-enabled it
    On the file server I have emptied the recycle bin, but I don't really think that has an impact on those folders.
    If anyone can shed some light I would be very grateful.
    Thanks!
    Jeffrey S. Patton Assistant Director of IT School of Engineering Computing Services University of Kansas 1520 West 15th Street Lawrence, KS. 66045-7621 | http://patton-tech.com

  • Comments on query issue

    Hi experts,
    We have an opption in the Portal like when we have a BI query displayed in portal as iview we will get one tab called comment  where we can enter the comments for the query, how can we set an indicator when some comments exist for the query.
    for example
    A executes the query in the portal and he notices some issue with the report like say sales is lower than expected and he writes a comment on that issue. so if B executes the same query he should be able to know that a comment exists for that query automatically by flagging an indicator...or something
    because they have to open the comments to see whether any comments exists or not.
    any option in the WAD (WEB ITEM) to display all messages.
    Thanks and regards

    interesting question... my suggestion would be to try creating a cell but am not sure if you can feed in data on a daily basis on a cell it might be a lil confusing and complicated for the end user to keep feeding in this information... but please keep me posted on how you achieve this...
    pls email me [email protected]
    george

  • Comment and Markup toolbar doesn´t show

    Hi,
    I am using a third party application which uses Adobe Reader 9.2 Pro.
    Actually the application is hosted on 2 Citrix servers that points to the application server.
    Scenario:
    When hitting "Comment" option on the application, it launches an IE explorer reader with Adobe.
    The server 1 uses IE Explorer 8.0.6001.19579, after hitting comment, the IE reader opens the pdf with the toolbar of Comment and Markup whitout issue.
    The server 2 uses IE 8.0.7601.17514, and after hitting comment, the IE reader opens the PDF without the toolbar of Comment and Markup,i have checked and is not hidden / unchecked.
    Both servers has the same configuration besides IE version.
    Do you know why is this happening? I am not able to figure out this
    Thanks,
    Gustavo!

    Not a problem at all.
    For Adobe Reader 9 to have use of Commentng & Review the open PDF must have been reader enabled by Acrobat Pro or LiveCycle ES.
    New with Adobe Reader X is the built-in use of Highlight and Sticky Note (no reader enabled required).
    Be well...

  • Package comments and excluded files

    I have an ant target to generate javadoc for a whole package structure minus one sub-package and one class, plus a few classes from another package:
      <target name="doc">
        <mkdir dir="${build}/docs/api"/>
        <javadoc destdir="${build}/docs/api/"
          use="true"
          windowtitle="Public API">
          <classpath>
            <path refid="3rdparty.jar.path"/>
          </classpath>
          <fileset dir="${build}">
            <include name="com/company/pkg1/**"/>
            <exclude name="com/company/pkg1/util/**"/>
            <exclude name="com/company/pkg1/server/ServiceMBean.java"/>
            <include name="com/company/pkg2/CustomerReport.java"/>
            <include name="com/company/pkg2/DeprecatedReport.java"/>
            <include name="com/company/pkg2/Report.java"/>
            <include name="com/company/pkg2/TagReport.java"/>
          </fileset>
        </javadoc>
      </target>This worked fine until I started including package.html files for package documentation. Running this with package.html in com/company/pkg1 gives the following error:
    javadoc: Illegal package name: "C:\abc\def\com\company\pkg1\package.html"
    After playing around, I found that if I shift the 3 <include> and <exclude> lines referring to pkg1 out of the <fileset> tag and into a <packageset> tag, then the package comments work. However, then the exclude for the individual java class (ServiceMBean.java) does not work. Likewise, shifting the file exclude back to the fileset tag still does not exclude it.
    It seems that I must decide whether to have package comments or the ability to exclude individual files, but not both. Is there any way around this?

    Well, it is a known issue. And actually, issue is with DBMS_METADATA, not with DATAPUMP, which simply uses DBMS_METADATA:
    SQL> create or replace package
      2  --comment
      3  MyPkg
      4  is
      5  a number;
      6  end;
      7  /
    Package created.
    SQL> select text from user_source where name = 'MYPKG' order by line;
    TEXT
    package
    --comment
    MyPkg
    is
    a number;
    end;
    6 rows selected.
    SQL> select dbms_metadata.get_ddl('PACKAGE','MYPKG') from dual;
    DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL('PACKAGE','MYPKG')
      CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE "SCOTT"."MYPKG"
    is
    a number;
    end;
    SQL> You should put comments after package name:
    SQL> create or replace package
      2  MyPkg
      3  --comment
      4  is
      5  a number;
      6  end;
      7  /
    Package created.
    SQL> select dbms_metadata.get_ddl('PACKAGE','MYPKG') from dual;
    DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL('PACKAGE','MYPKG')
      CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE "SCOTT"."MYPKG"
    --comment
    is
    a number;
    end;
    SQL> SY.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Any hope of a new CourseBuilder?

    Any hope of a new version of CourseBuilder for CS3? With added features? Compatible with Firefox (drag and drop, timer, slider...)? We have hundreds of exercises based on CB? We have tailored the interactions to our needs. We suppose we are not alone

  • URL rewriting for a WebService Consumer Proxy

    Hi all, Did anybody come across this issue? I have a SAP System - let's call it "TM" -  that I want to bind with another non-SAP one - let's call it "FB" - without any PI between them. The communication is made as a Service Consumer (TM side), the Pr

  • Extending classes at runtime

    Hi, Is there a way to extend a class at runtime? What I'd like to do is the following: I want to have a tabbed pane component that does not stretch its tabs when there are several lines of tabs. The stretching of the tabs is implemented in the UI com

  • My update says that its going to take 6 hours to install , is this normal?

    my update says that its going to take 6 hours to install , is this normal?

  • Adobe reader. Cannot view or download web .pdfs: Mac OS X 10.6.8 Safari 5.1.5

    I have followed the help intructions: Adobe Reader preferences>Internet> Web Browser Options.  But the 'Display PDF in browser usng' box is not highlighted  (i.e. it is selected but cannot be used). This has happened since I downloaded the latest Rea