Commitment item with schduling agreement

Friends,
Is it possible to restrict the user with budget at scheduling agreement level. if yes, how, please guide me for relevant configuration.
regards,

Hi,
Agreement does not create commitment in FM, therefore, cannot be restricted by FM budget.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Commitment Item with G/L Account

Dear All,
What is the main purpouse of assigning the Comittment Item to G/L Account. Is it Budget Purpouse or Cash flow Purpouse?
Regards

Hi,
Mainly, it's for FM component (budget).
Regards,
Eli

Reassignment of commitment items & fund centers in open PR, PO & MIGO docs

Hi
We are using Fund Management (BCS) in our system since last one year. Now starting from next fiscal year ( 01.04.2009) we want to replace some of the existing fund centers and commitment items with either newly created fund centers & commitment items or existing ones. We will be changing FM derivation strategy too.
How should one go about it? Whats should be the strategy and procedure for replacing the commitment items & fund centers in open PR, POs & other open document. I know there is option of reassignment of fund centers and commitment items using reassignment derivation strategy. But I am not clear about the steps involved and strategy one should use while doing so.
Pawan

Hello Pawan,
You can also combine reassignment with closing operations (Carryforward with reassignment)
Pls check the link, under 'Closing Operations -> Derivation Strategy for Reassignments with Closing Operations'
By doing so, you can carry forward for example open PO's assigned to given account assingment in 2008 to a new account assignment in 2009
Reassignment programs RFFMCHAN and RFFMCHAT are normally used when Wrongly assigned documents or changes in the responsibility areas of the functional assignment necessitate account assignment changes within the year, or when PSM-FM is implemented later than other components.
I hope this will help
Kind regards
Mar

Commitment item error at the time of Service entry Sheet

Hi experts,
I have created a service PO, in which I have given the GL. Now when I am going to post the service entry sheet, I am changing the GL account. But system is picking the commitment item with reference to the GL earlier provided in PO.
I want to pick the commitment item with reference to the GL I am providing in service entry sheet.
Pl suggest how can I achieve this.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Hi Eli,
Thanx for your response.
But derivation rule is same for all GL. Whether we put GL in PO or in Service entry sheet, system will derive the commitment item from the same single rule.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

FI 606 No Commitment Item Selected during MB01

Dear All,
I have a problem during GR/IR process in MB01. When logistic section want to post the GR process based on the PO reference, there is an error: No commitment items selected, message FI606.
I already created the commitment item with financial transaction 40, but it didn't affect anything during the GR. The error still the same.
When I try to post the GR, I already activated the trace. There is a GL account for RAVE account derived to another commitment item which does not suitable with the derivation I already inputted in FMDERIVER.
Why does it happen?
Thanks

Hi Aleksey,
Thanks for your reply.
I already set the fin. transaction for GR/IR account 40 and it didn't affect anything.
And I already check the note 148967 and I'm confused how to implement the note.
So the posted journal when GR saved:
Dr. Inventory (GL: 141097200) --> budget, fin.transaction/CI category: 30/3
Dr. RAVE Purchase (GL: 600504000) --> non budget, fin. transaction/CI category: 40/3
Cr. AP GR/IR (GL: 300503000) --> non budget, fin. transaction/CI category: 40/3
I activated the trace before post the GR. In the trace result, the commitment item derived only the inventory commitment item.
Though, the GL appeared in the trace is GL RAVE Purchase (600504000), the commitment item derived is Inventory Commitment item (141097200).
And I check the derivation GL to Commitment Item, the GL RAVE purchase is derived to RAVE Purchase commitment item.
I dont know how it can be happen.
Any solutions? Thanks

Mass chnage Commitment Item in GL account FS00

Hi,
I wan to add commitment items for GL account there are 1000 GL accounts for each 250 we have different commitment items is it possible to do mass change without BDC, can i use OB_GLACC12 but i have not found the filed commitment items for chnaging the parameters.
regards,
zafar
Moderator: Use LSMW

Hi,
you can change Commitment item with each 250 GL a/C
1 - use T.Code: MASS
2 - Select Object Type BUS3006 & Execute
3 - Select G/L account master (company code) (SKB1) & Execute
4 - Give Comp Code & GL from to number & Execute
Here select commintment item field and change Mass Records
If you required any help let us know.
Or Create LSMW
Regards
Viswa
Moderator: Points unassigned due to incorrect solution. If the user wants to assign different commitment item to G/L, MASS transaction is not efficient

Invalid financial transaction of derived commitment item SALESREVENUE

Dear Sir,
I am Facing error while using T-code : VF02 (ReleasetoAccounting).
Invalid financial transaction of derived commitment item SALESREVENUE
Message no. FMBS105
Diagnosis
The derivation strategy (environment) derives an invalid account assignment of the budget address: the assigned commitment item SALESREVENUE has financial transaction 40. However, only commitment items with financial transaction 30 are allowed for budget addresses.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check the derivation strategy used for deriving the budget addresses in the budget structure settings of BCS in IMG activity Define Derivation Strategy for Budget Addresses.
Please advise me.
Dinesh

Hi,
Please consult your FICO consultant.
Thanks,
Vrajesh

Derivation of wrong commitment item in ML81N

Dear all,
A material document is created in ML81N with expenses a/c Dr. & provision for expenses a/c Cr & the budget is cosumed with debit of the expenses.& also Cr of this provision for expenses.Because the system defaulting the committment item of the expenses which is different from the commitment item attached to the provision for expenses G/L.
I have enhanced the derivation rule in FMDERIVE with checking the business transaction,G/L & commitment item.Then switch on Trace. Then while saving/posting/checking transaction i can see business transaction and other details also.
Even then the same problem is exist.
Now can any one advice me how to proceed further.
Thanks
Shivaji

Hi Shivaji,
Please check the following hints:
1) First of all, we need to be sure that all existent correction notes are implemented in your system. Please check if the following notes are applied in your system (including manual steps):
1289547 FM account assignment incorrect in GR/IR clearing in service
1450965 FM account assignment incorrectly inherited from PO
1480503 FM account assignment for GL line overwritten in MIRO
1502874 Planned Delivery Costs are not updated during GR/IR postings
These notes correct wrong behaviours in include LFMCOBLF06 related to account assignment.
If the notes are not there (and valid to your release/package), please apply all in one test system and retest your issue.
2) Regarding inheriting the FM assignments, material po's can retrieve the FM account assignments from the FM tables. This insures that the current FM account assigments are always used.
However, in the case of Services, it is not possible to use the FM tables as it is not guaranteed that the correct Account assigment will be retrieved. So, the SES table ESKN is used instead. The ESKN record is created at the time the SES is created.
So, the Invoice should inherit from the GR. But, it is not possible to read the FM tables to get the account assignment.
3) Talking about your derivation rules (i believe you checked this already), please enter in the derivation rule -> Definition Tab, double click in the name of your Target Field (bottom part of the screen).
There you will find the fields:
( ) Do not overwrite if Fld Already Filled
( ) Overwrite with new value
( ) Overwrite with new value if new value is not empty.
I believe you should have marked the first option due to your business requirements described in this thread.
4) I believe you have set your derivation rule to derive commitment item with the function module FMDT_READ_MD_ACCOUNT_COMPANY "Read Account Master Data". For additional information, check note
839488.
5) You can also add Conditions to your Derivation step regarding commitment item to not perform the step when (VORGN = 'RMWE' AND KTOSL = 'WRX') OR (VORGN = 'RMRP' AND KTOSL = 'WRX'). To simplify the maintenance of this condition, the Temporary flag could be used instead. You can set this flag in a previous step using the attributes above and then use that in the Condition list.
I hope this helps. If nothing helped, let me know the content of table FM01X in your system and your current release/package.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Commitment Item error-FIPOS

Hello Experts
As per our business requirement,we have activated FM area for our 3 company codes, & because of this we need to create commitment item with FIPOS tcode for each new or existing GL's
1) But now a days when we create commitment item, some GL's status shown in this tcode as different(item catagory changes automatically without manual intervention in this tcode)
2) Secondly since the activation of fm area, at the time of any kind of data entry system shows an error as " Item 00002: Commitment item -
gl no-- differs from item in account (- gl no.----
concern gl no changes as per entries
what should be the reason for the same.

Thanks Paolo
1) Regarding my first problem, is it so, that at the time of creating commitment item range shouldnot be given for gl for which commitment item alredy created?
& i know about edit individual commitment item, but that time also it's the combination of fin.tran. & item catagory vs default fin.tran. & default item catagary.(our difference shown because of non-syncro of this two so to whom we should take a base correct one & change the another one according to that?)
Plus how this status change automatically as when 4 days back i created commitment item by giving full range of gl for one company code that status was ok for all gl & when 1 day back i try by giving same range it show 11 gl with different status
2) secondly i check the master of gl, they have the same no. for commitment item.there is no problem with master but my message still comes
i) here i am giving one example of message wherin gl no starts with 4 is the expenses gl & gl starts with 2 is my recon account for vendor(this message comes at the time of bill booking by fb60)
Item 00002: Commitment item 411000004 differs from item in account (255300001)
ii) is it just warning message or does it have any future implecation?

No commitment items selected

I use Fund Management and Material Ledger in ECC 6.0.
When I excute the post closing in the CKMLCP Edit Costing Run, and the system show a error message
No commitment items selected
Message no. FI606
I search the solution on SDN Community, and find someone said that "create a comittment item with Financial transaction: 40. Strange".
But I don't know where to create a committment item with Financial transaction: 40"
Could anyone tell me the IMG Path? thank you very much

Hi,
The issue has to do with the integration of Material Ledger with Funds Management.
Please refer to the note: 148967 Integration of material ledger to FM
It is recommended that any FM area would have at least one technical commitment item of each type of the following financial transactions: 40, 50, 60, 90 no matter how your FM area is customized.
It is known that each line item of each document posted in an integrated component should have an FM address (fund + funds center + commitment item) if FM is activated.
For some cases it is done automatically by searching for a valid FM address that is not relevant for FM update at the same time, thus having a commitment item ws fin.transaction 50, for example.
For ML documents, system is looking for a commitment item with FT 40 or 50, even if FM is not to be updated afterwards. Hence, please create at least one commitment item with Financial Transaction 50 and retest the situation.
Please check also the following:
-Make sure that you are working under any of the 4 Warehouse concepts supported by SAP. See note 700485.
-Check/apply (if missing) note 148967 Integration of material ledger to FM. As of this note, you should derive a commitment item with financial transaction not equal to 30 nor 40 in ML postings
-Note 980168 FI 313 for commitment item with financial transaction <> 30 should be also implemented
Upon verification of the above, please activate trace for FMDERIVE (see note 666322) again and review your derivation.
Important:
Before creating any commitment item in FMCIA or consider any change in your customizing settings, please discuss with your Funds Mangement (PSM-FM) consultant.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Budgetory Commitment Items for Recon. accounts

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement of budgeting trade creditors in SAP. Currently in our legacy system we are budgeting trade creditors as well as expenses.
Now as per SAP point of view my understanding is that we can only budget expense and revenue items. But for recon. accounts like vendor and customer, budgeting is not possible in SAP. I tried creating a commitment item for vendor recon. account with financial transaction 30 and commitment item category 3 and the same was assigned to recon. account in FS00. I posted budget in this commitment item with reference to fund and fund center through FMBB(T.code). Budget category "payment" was used for posting this budget and budget was successfully posted. Now when i tried to post the invoice to vendor, the system asks me to enter fund and fund center in vendor line item as well. i provided the fund and fund center in vendor line item to which i posted budget earlier in FMBB. the document gets posted without any error but when i view the budget consumption report instead of deducting invoice amount from the consumable budget amount and show the net available budget system add this in the consumable budget and shows the net result as bellow:
can any one guide if budgeting of such item is possible in sap FM or can we just budget P/L items? need your guidance please.

Hi,
Payments made to a vendor can be tracked through FI/FI-CA modules.
As for PSM-FM, please, comprehend and explain to your client two important points:
a) You won't be able to budget a vendor separately, but only, and still hypothetically, through reconciliation account, which makes the whole thing meaningless, as there will be no control on specific vendor
b) You won't stop payment, from business perspective, to a vendor on duly registered invoice just because 'the budget was exceeded'
If your client is interested to follow the payments, he can 'budget' bank accounts. Again, this does not make any sense (at least, a blocking budgeting), because the control is already applied through treasury components and bank account balance itself. Still, technically, it could be done.
Regards,
Eli

Static Fund Center and Commitment Item

Dear All,
We have recently implemented Funds Management in our organisation and there are a few issues due to corrections in the account assignment derivation data by the user.
We have a derivation strategy that gets the Funds Center and Commitment Item values from the GL/Cost Center combination.
Now, the user frequently changes the cost center as there is little clarity with regards to which cost center should the assigned costs go to.
Now when the user enters the Cost Center and the GL the first time, the FC and CI get populated in the PR - fine till now...But when before saving the PR, he changes the cost center, the new assignment does not get picked up. The budget consumption too happens in the old fund center and commitment item corresponding to the first entered cost center / gl combination.
We ran a trace and we found that the trace has the new cost center in it, but the old funds center and commitment item, with the explanation that "None of the target fields are to be derived."
We have given account assignment as changeable in the cost center (K) account assignment. And the FC and CI are in the optional mode with the account assignment.
Is there any way by which the FC and CI value gets picked based on the latest changes and not on the last held data ? Or any user exit that might get the values from the FMDERIVE each time the data is entered and the return key hit ?
Thanks and Regards,
Wy.

Hi Aleksey,
Thanks for the note !
Looks like the note was implemented already for a previous storage location-based development.
We have now made a change to the existing path - the existing FC/CI values are deleted first and the new values picked from FMDERIVE everytime we hit 'ENTER' or 'SAVE'.
This way, every change to the PR has the FMDERIVE check, and the values are indirectly refreshed this way.
Not sure if this is the right path, but could not find a better alternative to account for the innumerable corrections to the purchasing documents that take place at our organisation.
Regards,
Wy.

Scheduling Agreement Item not reflected as commitment item in CO

HI SAP MM Gurus,
Good day!
Here is my scenario:
We need to create scheduling agreements with Account Assignment F which needs to have the commitment items reflected upon creation of the delivery schedule. This works ok if I create the documents (Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Schedule) manually, with the field EKPO-XOBLR being set to X to have the items pass through to CO
The problem is, due to the volume of documents processed, we need to create an upload program using the function module BAPI_SAG_CREATE. Upon observation, this does not update the commitments for the shceduling agreement items even though both the scheduling agreement and delivery schedule were created.
Any thoughts on how I can resolve this?
Kind regards,
DeLo

Are u sure the transaction code is ME33L, contracts use ME33K
Now this is tricky.
One way of finding the condition table used is (working backwards)...
go to table KONH
in the field VAKEY enter your contract(10 chars as in EKKO/EKPO w/ leading zeroes or trailing spaces) and contract line(5 chars w/ leading zeroes).
look at KVEWE (A in my case) and KOTABNR (16 in my case) used now join the two (A016 add the zero in between) now this is the condition table.
working forward.
if the condition table is A016
Get A016-KNUMH from A016
A016-KAPPL = 'M'
A016-KSCHL = 'PB00' (condition you are looking for)
A016-EVRTN = Your Contract Number
A016-EVRTP = Your Contract Line Number
Select DATAB (Validity Start Date), DATBI (Validity End Date) from KONH
where KNUMH EQ A016-KNUMH
Cheers!
Rishi

GR/IR Account with Wrong Commitment Item

Dear Experts,
When we doing GR(MIGO), system is not deriving the commitment item from FMDerive, istead taking the commitment item from offsetting GL entry. Is it common behavior? If not, how to force GR act derived into right commitment item which its category (40/3). Please kindly advise. Thank you.

Hi kkbdsp,
My issue is this GR account is never derived from FMDerive. And i searched in forum, this is common behavior in SAP like Ming Hong post below :
" What you described is a SAP standard behavior. For GR/IR account, system ignores whatever settings you made in FMDERIVE. FM account assignment is inherited from the PO. For example your consumption PO has expense account 456 with CI 456, Fund and FC; your GR/IR account is 123 with CI 123.
GR posting:
DR 456 with CI 456/Fund/FC
CR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
IR posting:
DR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
CR Vendor
Regards,
Ming
And my concern are :
- I am just wondering why do we need to make CI setting for GR/IR with category 40/30?
- if GR act is always derived from its offseting acct (expense acct 30/3), why then SAP give error message "GR reduction impossible. Wrong CI with FT 30 instead of 40 in GR/IR acct"?
Please kindly advise. Thanks.

Payment budget check with other superior commitment item

Dear Experts,
One issue regarding checking of payment budget.
Superior Commitment items : A1
Actual Commitment Items: A01,A02
Superior Commitment items : B1
Actual Commitment Items: B01,B02
Client can assign commitment budgets at A01,A02,B01 & B02 Level.
But Payment Budget can be done only at A1 level in some cases. At the time of payments budget can be consumed from A1 for A01,A02,B01 & B02.
How can achieve derviation strategy to meet this requirement.

Hi.
'But Payment Budget can be done only at A1 level in some cases'-what are the cases?
Actually you can build you Budget addresses depend on posting ledger(9A,9B). So you can use FMDT_READ_HIER_CMMT_ITEM function,where overwrite HIROOT_FIP with CMMTITEM, if PLDNR=9A. In this case budget address will be Superior CI if ledger=9A.
For another ledger (if actual=budget) you can to not write derivation, it'd be by default

Commitment item with schduling agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for