Condition value coming while taking vehicle return

When we are taking vehicle return one condition ZBLK is coming which was not in original billing document when the vehicle was sold. Kindly suggest what is wrong.
Regards
Vivek

Hello,
Please check you pricing procedure, this could be condition type which has been configured and enhanced to charge the return charges for the vehicle.
also if possible please put some more details, does this condition have any value ?, is it mandatory to put in the value, is it a statistical condition ?
if you scroll on the condition tab you will find the statistical check mark.
Hope this helps
Regards

Similar Messages

Max condition value - exceeds while creating a SO

Hi All,
I have a requirement which we are trying to meet up by a solution:-
Requirement:-
A fund value (e.g. 1,00,000) is to be allocated on a particular spend which is offered to customers (e.g. discounts)
So as and when the discounts are offered on the customer orders (SO) the funds value should get depleted
this process goes on and the discounts are offered to the customers, but the total discounts offered till date has reached (98,000), hence when a new order where the discount offered is lets say (5000) it should not allow user to offer it, since it should not go beyond the total fund value i.e. (1,00,000)
Solution:-
Setup:-
A condition type for discount ZCDS is created with "condition update" flag marked
In the condition records of the above condition --> Additional sales data --> Max condition value we will put the total allowed fund of 1,00,000
Transactions:-
Mutliple SO's are created with ZCDS discounts condition types ((1) 30,000 2) 30,000 3) 30,000)
Now in the cumulative values of the ZCDS condition record shows 90,000 for the above 3 orders
Now a new SO is being created with ZCDS valuee of 30,000... IT SHOULD NOT ALLOW TO POPULATE THE ZCDS - CONDITION VALUE OF 30,000 IN THE SO, SINCE IT WILL EXCEED THE TOTAL FUND AMOUNT OF 1,00,000 WHICH IS ALREADY ASSIGNED IN THE "MAX CONDITION VALUE"
ISSUE:-
I am able to create a 4th SO with 30,000 in ZCDS condition type which is updating the "cumulative values" (1,20,000) in the ZCDS condition records as well
QUESTION:-
Can the above scenario met through the solution we have proposed ?
Will the max condition value of 100000 not restrict the condition value in the SO since it is exceeding it ?
Please suggest in case i may have to configure setup additional in it
Appreciate quick replies!
Jimit Shah

Hi
This maximum condition value i have tested some time back
But my results were quiet different
In your example for the 4 th order , when i tested system was taking only 10000 ( the balance of the max condition value)
If we create another order say 5 th order, then for that condition type ZCDS system was taking ZERO value
So it was limiting to the maximum of 100000
But it was allowing us to create N number of orders ( after max condition value was reached )
For those extra orders system was taking zero value for ZCDS ( which i think is meaning less)
When i find time i will test this once again and come back to you
I tested this once again today and found that once the maximum condition value is reached for the rest of orders system was taking the nett value as blank
This is the same with my earlier findings
In your example system will not take it to 120000 if the maximum condition value is set to 100000
If that is happening then there is problem somewhere
and in the condition item details analysis system very clearly tells that MAX value is reached for that condition
MAX condition value is working perfectly
Regards
Raja
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Feb 11, 2011 3:56 PM
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Feb 11, 2011 4:04 PM

Lumia 800- Red eye coming while taking picture

Hi friends,
while taking pictures red eye is coming.
Also in darker background picture comes not perfect.
Please give solution.
OS version:- 7.10.8773.98
Firmware:- 1750.0805.8773.12220

@parag4485
Look in Windows Marketplace:-
http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/store/app/red-eye-fix/197b5b69-dc00-e011-9264-00237de2db9e
http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/store/app/red-eye-remover/a93f4a5c-3e5b-49a3-8834-19e2594f18c2
Happy to have helped forum with a Support Ratio = 42.5

Process of replacement in case of vehicle returns

scenario:
the vehicle came returned;so now client wants to replace this to other;
how can v do it?
plz help regarding the above.
thanks in advance

sameer...create a seperate process for these kind of replacements..where you are not giving the customer return but actually swapping one material with another...create a new movement type through OMJJ...where accounting entries should be suppressed...with this..while taking the return customer credit limit should not updated..and then you can sell/swap the old material with new with reference to the old.
I hope you got the flavour of the idea.
Reward points if it helps,
Regards,
N

Condition value is not updating in shipment cost documents.

We are creating a shipment cost document and condition value is not updating automatically when we enter the amount.
Regards,
Jagadeesh

Dears,
The material master of the material is not maintained with gross weight and net weight, hence automatic updation for condition value is not taking place, i resolved the issue.
Thanks,
Jagadeesh

PR/ Sales order value not coming in condition value routine

As per the requirement while creating a PO I need to add a new condition type and need to calculate condition price for this newly added condition based on some matrix.
For this requirement PO will always be created with reference to PR and with account assignment category as 'E' .
(Hence sales order number /item will be copied from PR to PO in account assignment tab )
Now I have created a new pricing requirement routine ( To add the condition type ) and new condition routine to calculate and update the price.
These routines are working fine if i check them with hard coded price values.
But the problem is that I need the PR number(which we put in item overview ) / Sales order item number (from account assignment ). these values are not coming in pricing tables in the routine...structure EKPO come blank, KOMP-AUBEL is also blank).
Please give your suggestions how i can i get PR/ SO in the condition values routine .
Please reply

resolved my self

BAPI_CUSTOMERQUOTATION_CHANGE - error while changing a condition value

Hallo Gurus,
I am trying to use tshi BAPI BAPI_CUSTOMERQUOTATION_CHANGE to change a condition value of a condition record of a quotation.
Every time I execute the BAPI, instead of the condition tyoe being changed, a new record is added to the list of conditions!
Can someone please help!
Thsi is my piece of code::
itab_BAPISDH1X-UPDATEFLAG = 'U'.
append itab_BAPISDH1X.
itab_BAPICOND-ITM_NUMBER = '10'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_ST_NO = '31'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_COUNT = '00'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_TYPE = 'ZST3'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_VALUE = '15.00'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_UPDAT = 'X'.
append itab_BAPICOND.
itab_BAPICONDX-ITM_NUMBER = '10'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_ST_NO = '31'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_COUNT = '00'.
itab_BAPICONDX-COND_TYPE = 'ZST3'.
itab_BAPICONDX-UPDATEFLAG = 'X'.
itab_BAPICONDX-COND_VALUE = 'X'.
append itab_BAPICONDX.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_CUSTOMERQUOTATION_CHANGE'
EXPORTING
    salesdocument                = p_vbeln
QUOTATION_HEADER_IN          =
    quotation_header_inx         = itab_BAPISDH1X
tables
    return                       = itab_BAPIRET2
   CONDITIONS_IN                = itab_BAPICOND
   CONDITIONS_INX               = itab_BAPICONDX
Thanks!
Mukta

Hmm...
Change the following....and check..
itab_BAPICONDX-ITM_NUMBER = '10'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_ST_NO = '31'.
itab_BAPICOND-COND_COUNT = '00'.
itab_BAPICONDX-COND_TYPE = 'ZST3'.
itab_BAPICONDX-UPDATEFLAG = 'X'.
itab_BAPICONDX-COND_VALUE = 'X'.
append itab_BAPICONDX.
"change the above to.....
ab_BAPICONDX-COND_TYPE = 'X'.
append itab_BAPICONDX.
The BAPICONDX.. should contain only X.. in the fields which you want to update.. try this change..and let us know if it works.
Also have a look at the FUNCTION MODULE DOCUMENTATION for this bapi in SM37.
Cheers...

Condition value in billing not coming properly.

Hi All,
We have an issue wherein the condition value in billing document is not coming properly.
When qty is multiplied by the price the value should come as 208.04 ( 54.51 * 4 qty ), but the condition value is coming as 16.77.
We checked but could not find any proper reason for this.
When checked in details of condition type, we can see the Condition Origin as manually entered, but we are ot ale to trace the changes and also who entered the condition manually.
Kindly advise on the issue as it

Hi Mr. Satish,
I agree with Mr. Rajesh and for your 2nd question.
We can easily track down who entered the condition type in order
there are two possiblities
Either user who created the order, enter that condition type, that will not recorded in the changes so you can see the user id at header level--> on sales data page "Created by"
If some other user come in VA02 and enter the condition type then you can see it in
Go to Menu "Enviroment" --> Click at changes --> your document number is there --> Execute and see who entered it
Regards
MT

At time of return depot invoice creation , not capture Excise Condition Value

Hi,
my queastion is that
In retun process from Customer to Depot,
when user create return Depot invoice through t-code VF01 then Not capture Excise Condition Value ( JEXP - Basic Excise Duty , JCEP- Edu. Cess Duty and JA1X - Additional tax. ) at time of Depot. Invoice Creation.
we can also check Table J_1IRG23D, in this table have value of these Excise Cond. Value.
But Delivery No. is not update in table J_1IRG23D.
and I applied condition formula 356 in Procedure ZDOM02 ( Traders Pricing Procedure).
How can capture condition value of JEXP, JCEP and JA1X at time of Retrun Depot Invoice Creation ?
Guide me .....

Hi,
I have flow your define step:
Returns from Customer to Depot
1     Create a return order in Depot
2     Key in the invoice number and execute
3     Assign Order Reason and save
4     Create a return delivery and do PGR. Maintain storage location 1030
5     Create Transfer posting in MB1B with movement type 453, storage location 1030 and save
6     Note down the material document reference
7     Go to J1IG to reverse excise issue posting
8     Click "Capture"
9     Key in the material document number and series group
10     Click "Details". Now select the line item and again click "More documents"
11     Key in the original excise invoice reference created at supplying plant
12     Skip all warning message and go back
13     Maintain the internal number and the year.
14     With this, entry from RG23D will be reversed
But still the excise condition values are not being captured during invoice VF01 and std depot routing 356 is being used.
Program name of depot routing is FV64A356.
we can also check Table J_1IRG23D, in this table have value of these Excise Cond. Value.
But Delivery No. is not update in table J_1IRG23D.
Guide me.........

VPRS has condition value 0 in Returns Order item

Hi Experts,
Our customer created a returns order refer to F2 invoice, but in returns order its VPRS has condition value 0. It caused accouting document error in Credit for Returns. There was no cost related accouting posted.
Our Credit for Returns is order-ralated.
But when we update the pricing in returns order item, VPRS has the right value.
Any advice will be appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Richard

In addition to the suggestions already given, you may also have a look at the following notes which may help you.
1) Note 27062 - VPRS: deliv-related billing document for returns
2) Note 615432 - No cost with non-valuated goods receipts
3) Note 672681 - VPRS calculation in RK document
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Referencing condition values when creating return order is wrong...

Hello Experts,
Lets say I have a billing document that has 3 line items namely material A, B and C.
Now, I created a return order for material A with 2 separate line items because of different
storage locations. Now, is there a user-exit that lets my 2nd line item copy the condition values of the
1st line item of the reference billing document? because they are of the same material(A).
Currently, we are having problems when creating a return order having multiple line items of the same material
because the succeeding line items copies the wrong condition values of the referenced billing doc.
For example:
Original billing document:
Material      Discount
A          100
B          200
C          300
Return Order:
Material     Discount
A          100
A          200
A          300
The succeeding line items of my return order must point to the first line item since they are of the
same material. Hope you can help me guys. Thank you and take care!

You may need to explore in the copy control definition, especially the pricing type defined. Check if any customized requirements exists for condition which checks w.r.t to the document number instead of reference document number item.

Net value issue while creating return order with reference to billing

Dear All,
I created SO / DEL/ BILLING for qty 100 say net value-20000.When i created Return order with refrence to billing document,
net value appearing same ( 20000) for 50 quantity.Pl do advise asap as its required urgently.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
raj
Edited by: raj_sapsd on Aug 20, 2010 9:18 AM

surelly problem in VTAF
F2 to RE
DATAT: 103
DATAT: 103
DATAT: 003
Coping requirement 021
item level TAN and ietm cat proposal G2N
DataT: 153
Datat: 104
datat: 004
Coping requirement 303
Update doc Flow X
only possibilites Removed my Moderator
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Aug 21, 2010 9:31 AM
Please avoid asking for points

The return statement is expected to return a conditional value: found type VARCHAR . (COR-10622)

Hi Gurus,
As I am totally new to the SAP Information Steward, Please help me in the below if condition:
BEGIN
IF($Rule_CHAR_REM LIKE ('.%')) RETURN replace_substr($Rule_CHAR_REM, '.', '', 1, 1);
END
$Rule_CHAR_REM is the parameter which i created and I need to search if the field record is starting from '.' and if it is present than remove the '.'.
Regards,
DJ

dear dj
Try this
data nPos type i.
SEARCH $Rule_CHAR_REM FOR '.'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0 .
      nPos = SY-FDPOS .
       if nPos = 0 .
           REPLACE FIRST OCCURRENCES OF '.' IN
             $Rule_CHAR_REM WITH ''.
       endif.
ENDIF.
Regards
Parveen

Getting error while taking MAX DB trans log backup.

Hi,
I am getting error while taking trans log backup of Maxdb database for archived log through data protector as below,
[Critical] From: OB2BAR_SAPDBBAR@ttcmaxdb "MAX" Time: 08/19/10 02:10:41
Unable to back up archive logs: no autolog medium found in media list
But i am able to take complete data and incremental backup through data protector.
I have already enabled the autolog for MAX DB database and it is writing that log file directly to HP-UX file system. Now i want to take backup of this archived log backup through data protector i.e. through trans log backup. So that the archived log which is on the file system after trans log backup completed will delete the archived logs in filesystem. So that i don;t have to manually delete the archived logs from file system.
Thanks,
Subba

Hi Lars,
Thanks for the reply...
Now i am able to take archive log backup but the problem is i can take only one archive file backup. Not multiple arhive log files generated by autolog at filesystem i.e /sapdb/MAX/saparch.
I have enabled autolog and it is putting auto log file at unix directory i.e. /sapdb/MAX/saparch
And then i am using the DataProtector 6.11 with trans log backup to backup the archived files in /sapdb/MAX/saparch. When i start the trans backup session through data protector it uses the archive stage command as "archive_stage BACKDP-Archive LOGBackup NOVERIFY REMOVE" If /sapdb/MAX/saparch has only one archive file it will backup and remove the file successfully. But if /sapdb/MAX/saparch has multiple archive files it gives an error as below,
Preparing backup.
            Setting environment variable 'BI_CALLER' to value 'DBMSRV'.
            Setting environment variable 'BI_REQUEST' to value 'OLD'.
            Setting environment variable 'BI_BACKUP' to value 'ARCHIVE'.
            Constructed Backint for MaxDB call '/opt/omni/lbin/sapdb_backint -u MAX -f backup -t file -p SAPDB.13576.1283767878.par -i /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.
bsi_in -c'.
            Created temporary file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out' as output for Backint for MaxDB.
            Created temporary file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err' as error output for Backint for MaxDB.
            Writing '/sapdb/data/wrk/MAX/dbm.ebf' to the input file.
            Writing '/sapdb/data/wrk/MAX/dbm.knl' to the input file.
        Prepare passed successfully.
        Starting Backint for MaxDB.
            Starting Backint for MaxDB process '/opt/omni/lbin/sapdb_backint -u MAX -f backup -t file -p SAPDB.13576.1283767878.par -i /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.
bsi_in -c >>/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out 2>>/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err'.
            Process was started successfully.
        Backint for MaxDB has been started successfully.
        Waiting for the end of Backint for MaxDB.
            2010-09-06 03:15:21 The backup tool is running.
            2010-09-06 03:15:24 The backup tool process has finished work with return code 0.
        Ended the waiting.
        Checking output of Backint for MaxDB.
        Have found all BID's as expected.
    Have saved the Backup History files successfully.
    Cleaning up.
        Removing data transfer pipes.
            Removing data transfer pipe /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.BACKDP-Archive.1 ... Done.
        Removed data transfer pipes successfully.
        Copying output of Backint for MaxDB to this file.
Begin of output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out)----
            #SAVED 1009067:1 /sapdb/data/wrk/MAX/dbm.ebf
            #SAVED 1009067:1 /sapdb/data/wrk/MAX/dbm.knl
End of output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out)----
        Removed Backint for MaxDB's temporary output file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out'.
        Copying error output of Backint for MaxDB to this file.
Begin of error output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err)----
End of error output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err)----
        Removed Backint for MaxDB's temporary error output file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err'.
        Removed the Backint for MaxDB input file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_in'.
    Have finished clean up successfully.
The backup of stage file '/export/sapdb/arch/MAX_LOG.040' was successful.
2010-09-06 03:15:24
Backing up stage file '/export/sapdb/arch/MAX_LOG.041'.
    Creating pipes for data transfer.
        Creating pipe '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.BACKDP-Archive.1' ... Done.
    All data transfer pipes have been created.
    Preparing backup tool.
        Setting environment variable 'BI_CALLER' to value 'DBMSRV'.
        Setting environment variable 'BI_REQUEST' to value 'OLD'.
        Setting environment variable 'BI_BACKUP' to value 'ARCHIVE'.
        Constructed Backint for MaxDB call '/opt/omni/lbin/sapdb_backint -u MAX -f backup -t file -p SAPDB.13576.1283767878.par -i /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_
in -c'.
        Created temporary file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out' as output for Backint for MaxDB.
        Created temporary file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err' as error output for Backint for MaxDB.
        Writing '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.BACKDP-Archive.1 #PIPE' to the input file.
    Prepare passed successfully.
    Constructed pipe2file call 'pipe2file -d file2pipe -f /export/sapdb/arch/MAX_LOG.041 -p /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.BACKDP-Archive.1 -nowait'.
    Starting pipe2file for stage file '/export/sapdb/arch/MAX_LOG.041'.
        Starting pipe2file process 'pipe2file -d file2pipe -f /export/sapdb/arch/MAX_LOG.041 -p /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.BACKDP-Archive.1 -nowait >>/var/tmp/tem
p1283767880-0 2>>/var/tmp/temp1283767880-1'.
        Process was started successfully.
    Pipe2file has been started successfully.
    Starting Backint for MaxDB.
        Starting Backint for MaxDB process '/opt/omni/lbin/sapdb_backint -u MAX -f backup -t file -p SAPDB.13576.1283767878.par -i /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_
in -c >>/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out 2>>/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err'.
        Process was started successfully.
    Backint for MaxDB has been started successfully.
    Waiting for end of the backup operation.
        2010-09-06 03:15:25 The backup tool process has finished work with return code 2.
        2010-09-06 03:15:25 The backup tool is not running.
        2010-09-06 03:15:25 Pipe2file is running.
        2010-09-06 03:15:25 Pipe2file is running.
        2010-09-06 03:15:30 Pipe2file is running.
        2010-09-06 03:15:40 Pipe2file is running.
        2010-09-06 03:15:55 Pipe2file is running.
        2010-09-06 03:16:15 Pipe2file is running.
        Killing not reacting pipe2file process.
        Pipe2file killed successfully.
        2010-09-06 03:16:26 The pipe2file process has finished work with return code -1.
    The backup operation has ended.
    Filling reply buffer.
        Have encountered error -24920:
            The backup tool failed with 2 as sum of exit codes and pipe2file was killed.
        Constructed the following reply:
            ERR
            -24920,ERR_BACKUPOP: backup operation was unsuccessful
            The backup tool failed with 2 as sum of exit codes and pipe2file was killed.
    Reply buffer filled.
    Cleaning up.
        Removing data transfer pipes.
            Removing data transfer pipe /var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.BACKDP-Archive.1 ... Done.
        Removed data transfer pipes successfully.
        Copying output of Backint for MaxDB to this file.
Begin of output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out)----
End of output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out)----
        Removed Backint for MaxDB's temporary output file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_out'.
        Copying error output of Backint for MaxDB to this file.
Begin of error output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err)----
End of error output of Backint for MaxDB (/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err)----
        Removed Backint for MaxDB's temporary error output file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_err'.
        Removed the Backint for MaxDB input file '/var/opt/omni/tmp/MAX.bsi_in'.
        Copying pipe2file output to this file.
Begin of pipe2file output (/var/tmp/temp1283767880-0)----
End of pipe2file output (/var/tmp/temp1283767880-0)----
        Removed pipe2file output '/var/tmp/temp1283767880-0'.
        Copying pipe2file error output to this file.
Begin of pipe2file error output (/var/tmp/temp1283767880-1)----
End of pipe2file error output (/var/tmp/temp1283767880-1)----
        Removed pipe2file error output '/var/tmp/temp1283767880-1'.
    Have finished clean up successfully.
The backup of stage file '/export/sapdb/arch/MAX_LOG.041' was unsuccessful.
2010-09-06 03:16:26
Cleaning up.
    Have encountered error -24919:
        Can not remove file '/var/tmp/temp1283767880-0'.
        (System error 2; No such file or directory)
    Could not remove temporary output file of pipe2file ('/var/tmp/temp1283767880-0' ).
    Have encountered error -24919:
        Can not remove file '/var/tmp/temp1283767880-1'.
        (System error 2; No such file or directory)
    Could not remove temporary output file of pipe2file ('/var/tmp/temp1283767880-1' ).
Have finished clean up successfully.
Thanks,
Subba

Transfer condition values with +/- signs to CO-PA (Explain the purpose)

Dear Sap guru's,
Could you please guide me on the below issue, We make a new condition type zne1 which is excise duty free items, Based on cleint requirement. a/c entry like this ( example )
10) 210 ea            net value 23,153.04 cost 21,600.00
20) 0 ea              net value 0               cost 2400
           Customer AC           DR 20163 Rs
           Excise duty payble   Cr 432 -
           Sales                      Cr 22721-
           vat payable              cr 3010-
           excise duty payble   cr 48-
           Excise duty free       cr 48-
           Excise duty free       dr 48
           sales                       dr 48
Here client pay the excise duty for free goods issue items, For this situation what ever the amount he paid in the excise duty free item that same amount he wants to reduce in sales ie it should be debit in my exaple it is 48 rs.
My problem is i configured ZNE1 condtion assgined to value filed ERLOS. While release to a/c system returns "CHEK VALUE FILED ASSIGNEMENT TO CONDITION TYPE". when I make the settings +/- sign for the conditon system allow me to release and save. Please guide me whithout assignment how to release billing document?
Regards
Maruthi

Hi
Conditions from SD are always transferred to CO-PA with "+" signs, with the exception of credit memos and returns. The reasons for this is that the signs for revenues are handled differently in the different applications of the R/3 System. For example, revenues are positive in SD, while they are negative in FI. Consequently, CO-PA accepts all the values as positive, and then subtracts deductions and costs from revenues in the information system.
This configuration needs to be done in the system if you have the CO-PA active and the SD flows are configured. Unfortunately you will not be able to ignore this. Please see below some SAP help snippets for your benefit.
Note that certain limitations exist on the transfer of condition values of billing documents to CO-PA.
1. To transfer condition types for sales revenues and sales deductions to CO-PA, you need to make sure that the condition types and linked to an account in FI that is also defined as a cost element of the category "11" (revenue element) or "12" (sales deduction) in CO. These condition types must be assigned to a CO-PA value field.
Condition types linked to FI accounts that are defined as cost elements of another category are not transferred to CO-PA, even when the condition type has been assigned to a CO-PA value field.
2. Condition types such as "VPRS" ("Cost") that are defined as statistical in SD are always transferred to CO-PA if they are assigned to a value field.
3. All condition types that you want to transfer to CO-PA must be active in the SD pricing procedure. Inactive conditions in a billing item are not transferred. If all the conditions in a billing item are inactive, that item is not transferred to CO-PA.
Conditions do not need to be active, however, to be transferred with sales order items, since the transfer of incoming sales orders is always statistical.
It is also possible to transfer conditions from MM to update billing data in pooled payment in the IS Retail system. These are transferred according to the same rules as SD conditions
Hope it was helpful.
Karthik

Condition value coming while taking vehicle return

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for