Conditon record is not picking in CRM

I have created new condition table with new combination and downloaded to CRM from R/3. After that i have new condition records with that combination and those records also came to CRM from R/3. But when i create service order this condtion record is not getting picked. Now can any one guide me like whether i missed anything.

Hi
You can do a Create PL simulation for that customer product to see why the condition records is not getting picked up. You can set a trace to see the access sequence and the condition type that gets picked up in the service order.
Ajay Gupta

Similar Messages

  • Scale maintained in info records but not picking up in scheduling agreement

    Hi,
    We have maintained scales for PB00 in info record (subcontracting), this scale is picked up in Subcontracting Purchase Order.
    But when we are trying to create Subcontracting scheduling agreement, this scale is not picked up by the system.
    Why the system is picking up scales for PO but not for scheduling agrmment?
    Regards,

    Hey there,
    Please check your InfoUpdate Indicator on the scheduling agreement.
    The indicator determines which prices and conditions are suggested in future PO items.
    Prices and conditions can apply to an entire purchasing organization or to a single plant within a purchasing organization.
    For example, if you create a purchase order for a plant for which an info record has been defined at plant level, the purchase order is based on the conditions in the plant info record and not on the conditions that apply to the purchasing organization.
    probably your info record is at the Porg level and not at the plant level and hence it's not picking it up.
    Hope this helps,
    Cheers,
    Dhaval

  • Condition Record is not picking

    Dear All,
    We are facing the problme while creating Sales Order.
    It showing Pricing error: Mandatory condition VR00 is missing
    I have done the follwoing activities:
    1.Created New Table with MVGR1 and MVGR2 (Material Group1 and 2) and Gennerated
    2.Created the new Acess Sequence and assigned to Newly created table
    3.Assigend the Acess Sequence to Condition type
    4. Created the condition records in VK11
    While creating the Sales Order it is showing Pricing error: Mandatory condition VR00 is missing
    In the Analysis it is showing Condition record is missing
    Please Guide me where im doing the mistake
    Thanks
    Vinay

    Hi Vinay,
    If you are getting the error like that means,
    In your pricing procedure apart from PR00, other condition type VR00 has been put check box as Mandatory.
    Remove that check now you will not be getting that error.
    See, you might be mainaianted condition record for PR00, for which its taking properly. But you might not maintained condition record for VR00. Check it out once. Mainainte condition record for VR00 or remove check box for "MANDATORY" in your pricing procedure.
    Hope this helps you.
    Reward if helpful
    Thanks,
    Praveen

  • PO not picking up the Price from Info Record ???

    Hi,
    Pricing Procedure and the Schema Grp is defined in Schema Determination in SPRO.
    Schema Grp has been assigned in the Vendor Master.
    Price has been maintained in the PB00 condition type in the Condition Supplements screen, but shows 'Zero' in the 'Purchasing Org. Data 1' screen of Info Record.
    However, while creating PO the system does not pick up the Price from the Info Record and both the Condition Types PB00 and PBXX appears and display the Amount as 0.00 ? Also the system does not take the value entered in the 'Net Price' field and the Price can only be entered manually in the Conditon Type in the Conditions Tab ?
    Can anyone help in resolving this issue ?
    Lucky.

    Hi Lucky
    1.Routine 6
    This is an example of a pricing requirement.  This requirement is met if the condition exclusion indicator is not equal to 'X'.  <b>This requirement can be assigned to a condition type in the pricing procedure to ensure that it is not accessed when a condition record with exclusion indicator 'X' has already been found</b>.  Condition exclusion is a general tool that can be used to exclude conditions from pricing based on previous conditions that have been found in the pricing procedure.  This requirement is intended for use in MM pricing versus SD pricing.  For SD pricing, a variation of requirement '2' should be used which would also check to see if the item category is relevant for pricing
    2. You have define all your supplementory condition in supplementory pricing procedure and you have to assign this supplementory procedure to your Condition type PB00.Then all these conditions will be displayed at item level for selection in drop down.
    Since the supplementory conditions are dependent on PB00, you have assign to the PB00.
    If you maintain the values for these conditions in info record, these values will be copied from info to PO.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Garageband is not picking sound from builtin mic (rMBP). I recorded some tracks, now it is not working. All other apps can use the mic. Monitoring is switched ON at GB, it picks sound only some other app, eg. Skype, is used to access the mic.

    Garageband is not picking sound from builtin mic (rMBP).
    I recorded some tracks, now it is not working. I have checked GB Preferences, Audio/MIDI > Audio Input > Built In Microphone.
    All other apps can use the mic. Dictation, Skype etc. can use the mic!
    Monitoring is switched ON at GB, it picks sound only some other app, eg. Skype, is used to access the mic.
    Can any one help me, Please!
    Many thanks!

    I have foud the solution - rather stupid. The system setting for audio input was at 70%, increasing it to 100% solves the problem!

  • PO not picking Purchasing org from info record

    Hi All,
    While creating PO system is not picking Purchasing org??? Rest capturing everything whatever is maintianed.
    Please tell me the solution
    Rgrds
    SS
    Edited by: SunilSisodia on Dec 14, 2011 8:59 PM

    Hi,
    Info record is combination of plant,material and vendor master record,all data from MMR  and Vendor get copied into Info record which flow IN PO while creating PO,
    when we enter vendor code and material master in PO then info-records come in PO
    check following like also
    [Info Record: Plant Vs Purchasing Org Level;
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee102f55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Net price not picking from info record

    I am creating a new PO, but net price is not picking from info record. Info record is getting copied in the line item for PO, but net price is not copied. Due to that I am unable to create PO. If I manually enter price PO can be created. Could someone tell me what might be the reason Price is not automatically taken from Info Record. Please guide me what all I need to check.
    The same data is working in one cleint, and in another client this data is facing problem.
    Thanks
    Vineeth

    Hi
    1) If there is condition record exit in system,then while creating po system will take condition record
    2) If In inforecord last po number is exist for material and vendor ,then system will take this into consideration
    3) if your creating po first time for material and vendor ,and we have maintain purchasing inforecord for purchasing organization and for plant,then system will take it into consideration
    40 If none is available we have to put condition manually in po
    Regards
    Kailas ugale

  • WICTMS not picking up wip_move_txn_interface records

    I am populating the wip_move_txn_interface table with a move record.  The WIP Move Transaction Manager (WICTMS) is running every 5 minutes.  But my record in the table is not getting processed.  3 days ago it was working, and the WICTMS pgm was recognizing the record and spawning the WIP Move Transaction Worker (WICTWS) program.  But today I am inserting a similar record with a move to next operation, and WICTMS is not picking up the record.  I can perform the move using the Oracle Apps move transaction form.
    Any ideas on what I am missing and why it worked 3 days ago but now is not working.  Below is my insert statement.
    insert into WIP_MOVE_TXN_INTERFACE
    (created_by_name
    ,creation_date
    ,fm_intraoperation_step_type
    ,fm_operation_seq_num
    ,last_update_date
    ,last_updated_by_name
    ,organization_id
    ,process_phase
    ,process_status
    ,to_intraoperation_step_type
    ,to_operation_seq_num
    ,transaction_date
    ,transaction_quantity
    ,transaction_uom
    ,wip_entity_name
    values
    ('name'   --created_by_name
    ,sysdate     --creation_date
    ,'1'         --fm_intraoperation_step_type
    ,30          --fm_operation_seq_num
    ,sysdate     --last_update_date
    ,'name'   --last_updated_by_name
    ,123         --organization_id
    ,1           --process_phase
    ,1           --process_status
    ,1           --to_intraoperation_step_type
    ,40          --to_operation_seq_num
    ,sysdate     --transaction_date
    ,1           --transaction_quantity
    ,'EA'        --transaction_uom
    ,'123456' --wip_entity_name

    Hi,
    Was it solved? .. I'm Facing a similar issue where the program runs fine and completes without any errors but it doesn't processes the record in the interface.
    Regards
    Ari

  • Pricing Condition not picking from Info record

    Dear Sapians
    We have made all the Changes for Higher Education Cess. Now while creating PO some conditions are not picking from info record(only for some materials). In Dev. server Everything working fine.
    What could be the problem?
    Warm Regards
    Sukumaran.E

    Hi Sukumaran,
    You need to go to PO -> item conditions -> press analysis button.
    double click on the pricing condition on left hand side screen. You will get proper analysis. Like "PBXX     111 Condition ignored (requirement 005 not fulfilled)"
    These descriptions will give clear hint on the reason of price not being picked up.
    - Sanjeev

  • PO having Item Category u0091Pu0092 or u0091Qu0092  price not picking from Condition Record

    Hi Guru,
    Purchase order having Item Category ‘P’ or ‘Q’ Price should pick from the condition type.
    Where my condition type against on material and WBS based on this Price will be fixed. 
    Now I create the PO for same, which the price was not picking from the Condition Record.
    Please help on this.
    Thanks
    Muthukumar

    The condition record was created and is being picked up in the calculation.  Also, I am now testing with a material that does not have a PIR created, so the PIR does have an impact on my current results.
    My current test has results as follows:  condition P101 = Std. Cost (as expect) $100.00; ZUPP = calculated at 5% (as expected) $105.00.  However, the Net Price in the PO line item is showing only $100.00, not the $105.00.
    A look at table EKPO shows the following: Net Price  (NETPR) $100.00; Net Value (NETWR) $100.00 ; Gross Value (BRTWR) $105.00.
    Can you tell me what I am missing with this setup?

  • Suggestion for not picking up the same record

    Hi All,
    I have a plsql procedure that picks up the records from the same table from multiple threads. Different threads should not pick up the same record.
    Current Logic:
    I am locking the row that has been picked up the current thread and the next thread should pick up the next row but unfortunately i have a problem here, The inner query will pick up the same record until the status of that particular row is changed since I am picking them up in a FIFO order.
    I am not able to add the lock row in the inner query since oracle does not support it. Is there any other way to do it simpler?
    XXRM_ARM_HEADER
    header_id
    service_id
    XXRM_ARM_LINES
    line_id
    header_id
    status
    Query
    SELECT dl.header_id, dl.line_id
    FROM xxrm_arm_header dh, xxrm_arm_lines dl
    WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
    AND dh.service_id = 4
    AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
    AND dl.line_id = (SELECT LINE_ID
    FROM ( SELECT dl.line_id
    FROM xxrm_arm_lines dl,
    xxrm_arm_header dh
    WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
    AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
    AND dh.service_id = 4
    ORDER BY dl.line_id ASC)
    WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
    FOR UPDATE OF dl.status NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED

    Robert Angel wrote:
    forgive me if I am naive, but why wouldn't each thread updating its selected rows with a nowait and if exception pick the next range mechanism work?It is not that simple. You can get race conditions between threads as they process the same rows in the same order attempting to "beat" one another by being the first to lock it. The more threads there are, the potentially worse this situation.
    There's also the issue of performance. The thread concept (aka parallel processing) in this respect has a single primary aim. Increase performance and scalability. But does it?
    How is I/O reduced when 50% or more of the reads done by the thread (to find a row to process) is wasted I/O as rows being read have already been locked by other processes/threads?
    The fact remains that if you give the same set of rows to a bunch of threads (e.g. DBMS_JOB processes) for processing, they will contend for the same rows. There will be overheads. There will be wasted I/O.
    So what I am suggesting is each thread; -
    1. Look for rows unprocessed, I usually use atribute field in e-Business suite for this purpose
    2. Attempt to update them with nowait, to INPROCESS
    3. If 2 fails, try the next range - repeat until 2 is possible or end of rangeAnd step 3 is the one that will waste I/O and waste time - as the time it spend looking for a row to process could have been spend on actually processing a row.
    4. You could also improve this by specialising each thread to have its own preferences, if there exists a mechanism that would mean fair distribution between the threads..Yes, and this is a key factor to removing contention between threads, reducing their I/O overheads and reducing their time being spend on finding unprocessed rows to lock and process.
    Then there's Oracle technical issues. On 11gr2 for example, despite using skip locked or nowait (that cannot be used together in a single clause like in 10g), I'm seeing deadlocks when threads contend for the same rows. Same code works fine in 10g without deadlocks. So the approach one chooses need careful testing on that specific Oracle version to ensure it behaves as expected and meets the performance requirements.
    Bottom line is that parallel processing is not as straight forward as simply slapping a nowait clause onto a select statement in order to skip locked rows.

  • Price from Pur Info record not picking up

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement to pick Price from Purchasing Info record for Standard Cost estimate (CK11N/CK40N).
    The purchase info record has been created and price maintained in both u201CNet Priceu201D and u201CEffective Priceu201D fields in info record.
    I have selected Strategy L Price from Purchasing Info record and maintained sub-strategies 3, 4 and 5 in Valuation variant:
    Strategy 3 u2013 Net Quotation Price
    Strategy 4 u2013 Gross Quotation Price
    Strategy 5 u2013 Effective Price from Quotation
    Though I maintained the above, system is not picking up price from info record in CK11N.
    Am I missing anything on this?
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Sree

    Sreechakravarty,
    Per your description, system picked up the price other than the Purchase Info Record price, right? If so, you can try to remove other pricing priorities while only leave the pricing priority "L", and then run CK11N again to see whether system can find the info record, otherwise system will give error message such like "can not find material price in plant code &1/batch &2".
    If the system do can not find the purchase info record, you should check anything wrongly maintained to the info record such like valid period. Make sure the valuation date you entered during CK11N should be within the valid period of the info record.

  • Pricing condition records should not be picked up

    Hi,
    I have configured a scenario for Supplementary Invoice for which I created a new sales order type. The requirement is such that this order type should not pick the pricing condition records that have been created in VK11. Please suggest how can this be configured.
    Do I have to use any Userexits, if so which one?
    Regards,
    Abhishek

    As mentioned by you, you have created a new Sales Order Type, you can create a new document pricing procedure, based on which you can determine a new pricing procedure.
    To configure new Document Pricing Procedure:
    IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Define Document Pricing Procedure. (Maintain the new Document Pricing Procedure in new Sales Order Type)
    Maintain a new Pricing Procedure, maintaining the Condition Types as manual. Maintain the determination of Pricing Procedure appropriately.
    Pricing Procedure Determination:
    In SD, Pricing Procedure is determined (T.Code: OVKK) based on Sales Area (Sales Organization + Distribution Centre + Division) + Customer Pricing Procedure + Document Pricing Procedure. Sales Area is determined in Sales Order Header Level. Customer Pricing Procedure is determined from Customer Master. Document Pricing Procedure is determined from Sales Document Type / Billing Type (if configured). Once the pricing procedure is determined, Condition records are fetched. If appropriate condition records are found, the price is determined. If Mandatory pricing condition is missing, system will through an error message.
    Pricing Procedure Configuration:
    In SD, the steps to configure Pricing procedure are as under:
    Step 1:
    Condition table (T.Code: V/04): If existing condition table meets the requirement, we need not create a new condition table. Considering the requirement for new condition table, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Condition Table (select the required fields combination, which will store condition record).
    Step 2:
    Access Sequence (T.Code: V/07): If existing access sequence meets the requirement, we need not create a new access sequence. Considering the requirement for new sequence, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Access Sequence (Access sequence is made up of Accesses (Tables) & the order of priority in which it is to be accessed. Here we assign the condition table to access sequence.
    Step 3:
    Condition Type (T.Code: V/06): If existing condition type meets the requirement, we need not create a new condition type. Considering the requirement for new condition type, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Condition Type. It is always recommended to copy an existing similar condition type & make the neccessary changes. Here we assign Access sequence to Condition type.
    Step 4:
    a. Pricing Procedure (T.Code: V/08):  It is recommended to copy a similar pricing procedure & make the neccesary changes in new pricing procedure. Pricing Procedure is a set of condition type & arranged in the sequence in which it has to perform the calculation. Considering the requirement for new Pricing Procedure, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Maintain Pricing Procedure.
    b. Pricing Procedure (T.Code: VOK0): After maintaining the pricing procedure the next step will be determination of pricing procedure. Configuration for determining pricing procedure in SPRO is as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Determine Pricing Procedure.
    5. Condition record (T.Code: VK11 / VK12): Condition record is a master data, which is required to be maintained by Core team / person responsible from the client. During new implementation, the condition records can be uploaded using tools like SCAT, LSMW, etc. Condition Record is maintained in T.Code: VK11 / VK12, which are captured in Sales Order & Billing.
    Also check document pricing procedure in Sales Document Type (T.Code: VOV8 - Sales order Type, VOFA: Billing Type (If Required)), customer pricing procedure in Customer Master Data (T.Code: XD02), ... are in place.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka

  • My speaker does not pick up sound when i video with my iphone or use the speaker,  yet the voice recorder works?

    my speaker does not pick up sound when i video with my iphone or use the speaker,  yet the voice recorder works? any ideas why? thanks

    Speakers have never picked up sound.
    Microphones record sound.

  • Receiving Open Interface not picking Inter-Org records from Interface

    Hi,
    I am trying to receive the inter org transfer through the Receiving Open interface, but the interface not picking the data from the interface tables (RCV_HEADERS_INTERFACE, RCV_TRANSACTION_INTERFACE).
    I am in 11.5.10.2, all the sources worked fine like Vendor, Internal Order, Customer but the issue is with the Inventory source (inter orgs)
    Please could you advise what could be the reason for the interface for not picking the Inventory source data from the interface table.
    Below are the interface insert script that am using..
    INSERT INTO RCV_HEADERS_INTERFACE
    (HEADER_INTERFACE_ID,
    GROUP_ID,
    PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE,
    RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE,
    TRANSACTION_TYPE,
    AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE,
    LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
    LAST_UPDATED_BY,
    LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
    CREATION_DATE,
    CREATED_BY,
    SHIPMENT_NUM,
    RECEIPT_HEADER_ID,
    SHIP_TO_ORGANIZATION_ID,
    EXPECTED_RECEIPT_DATE,
    EMPLOYEE_ID,
    VALIDATION_FLAG
    VALUES
    (rcv_headers_interface_s.nextval , --Header_Interface_Id
    rcv_interface_groups_s.nextval, --Group_Id
    'PENDING', --Processing_Status_Code
    'INVENTORY', --Receipt_Source_Code
    'RECEIVE', --Transaction_Type
    'DELIVER', --Auto_Transact_Code
    SYSDATE, --Last_Update_Date
    -1, --Last_Updated_By
    -1, --Last_Update_Login
    SYSDATE, --Creation_Date
    -1, --Created_By
    'ICR-001', --SHIPMENT_NUM
    21073573, --RECEIPT_HEADER_ID
    2266, -- SHIP_TO_ORGANIZATION_ID
    SYSDATE+1, --Expected_Receipt_Date
    5543, --Employee_Id,
    'Y' --Validation_Flag
    INSERT INTO RCV_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE
    (INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID,
    GROUP_ID,
    LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
    LAST_UPDATED_BY,
    CREATION_DATE,
    CREATED_BY,
    LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
    TRANSACTION_TYPE,
    TRANSACTION_DATE,
    PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE,
    PROCESSING_MODE_CODE,
    TRANSACTION_STATUS_CODE,
    CATEGORY_ID,
    QUANTITY,
    UNIT_OF_MEASURE,
    ITEM_ID,
    AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE,
    SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID,
    SHIPMENT_LINE_ID,
    SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID,
    RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE,
    TO_ORGANIZATION_ID,
    DESTINATION_TYPE_CODE,
    DELIVER_TO_PERSON_ID,
    LOCATION_ID,
    DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID,
    SUBINVENTORY,
    LOCATOR_ID,
    HEADER_INTERFACE_ID,
    VALIDATION_FLAG,
    SHIPPED_DATE
    --SELECT
    VALUES
    rcv_transactions_interface_s.nextval, --Interface_Transaction_id
    rcv_interface_groups_s.currval, --Group_id
    SYSDATE, --Last_update_date
    -1, --Last_updated_by
    SYSDATE, --Creation_date
    -1, --Created_by
    -1, --Last_update_login
    'RECEIVE', --TRANSACTION_TYPE_RECEIVE
    SYSDATE, --TRANSACTION_DATE
    'PENDING', --PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE
    'BATCH', --PROCESSING_MODE_CODE
    'PENDING', --TRANSACTION_STATUS_CODE
    203, -- CATEGORY_ID
    20, --QUANTITY
    'EACH', --UNIT_OF_MEASURE
    4379131, --ITEM_ID
    'DELIVER', --AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE
    21073573, --SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
    16566939, --SHIPMENT_LINE_ID
    101629781, --SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID
    'INVENTORY', --RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE
    2266, --TO_ORGANIZATION_ID
    'INVENTORY', --DESTINATION_TYPE_CODE
    13706, --DELIVER_TO_PERSON_ID
    101629781, --LOCATION_ID
    101629781, --DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID
    'FG', --SUBINVENTORY 
    46259, --LOCATOR_ID  
    rcv_headers_interface_s.currval, --Header_interface_id
    'Y', --VALIDATION_FLAG 
    SYSDATE
    Thank you,
    Genoo
    Edited by: Geno on May 25, 2013 4:54 AM

    Any suggestion/advise please!
    Thanks,
    Genoo

Maybe you are looking for

  • Phone not recognized by itunes

    I just plugged in my iPhone 4 and it is no longer recognized by iTunes.  It also says that the camera is not recognized,.  I have reset the phone, redownloaded and installed iTunes.  Nothing is working.

  • Itunes Library New Internal Hard Drive

    2009 iMac 27' OSX 10.6.8 I bought an external hard and moved the iTunes media folder location and all media via Preference/Advanced/Change... blah blah blah.  Worked great.no problems and all new iTunes media downloads and media additions were going

  • New NIS Installation on a Veritas Cluster

    I am getting the following error after running the following command: #ypinit -m Can't get local host's domain name. Please check your path. Any ideas ? Everything seems to look ok.

  • Oracle 10g Deprecated parameters !!

    We are planning to upgrade the database. I ran the u101iu.sql before the upgrade to know the Deprecated parameters and obsolete parameters. From Upgrade guide : it tells me the following parameters have been obsolete : DBLINK_ENCRYPT_LOGIN HASH_JOIN_

  • Generic Host Process failure on battery boot

    When I boot on battery 'DEP'(data execution prevention) closes the Generic Host Process for Win32 Services. I had a blue screen first but changed the gv3.sys driver from the Intel Pentium M processor to intelppm.sys. I'm not having the blue screen an