Consolidated companies 1000, 1500 are different

hi ,
when tried to do PGI(post goods issue) i am getting the below error
"consolidated companies (1000, 1500) are different ".
please suggest me .
regards,
deepa

PGI is the point where FI entries related to goods getting delivered are genereated.
Normally Finished Goods and Cost of Goods Sold GL of the same comapny are hit.
I guess in the particular case Finished Goods GL of one company code and cost of goods sold of different company is getting hit.
Thanks,
Ashish

Similar Messages

Error through F-44 that Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

Dear Expert
At the time of Vendor clearing through F-44 I get the
warning message that "Withholding tax information ignored"
where Withholding tax related customization and master has
been updated accordingly. If I ignore the same warning
and save the document as my all Debit and Credit transactions
are of equal amount ,i m getting the error that "Consolidated
companies 1000 and ' ' are different.
What specific setting is required for the same.
Thanks in advance
VG

Hi,
If you are getting error F5 080 then most probably this is because one of the documents to be cleared contains a different trading partner (field BSEG-VBUND).
Please check the contents of each customer/vendor line item concerning this field. The field can be viewed on the customer/vendor line item via button 'more data'. If the contents is different you have either to clear the items individually or you have to change the settings of the document type used for clearing. You can find out what document type is used for clearing in OBXH in the 'transfer with postings section'. Afterwards you can go to OBA7 and mark the flags 'Inter-company postings' and 'Enter trading partner'.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

Can anyone tell me the how to solve this error "Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different" which I am getting in F-04
Thanks,
Madan

Hi
Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
Regardss
Michael

Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different

Hi team,
While clearing TDS Salary GL system showing below error
Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different
     Message no. F5080
Diagnosis
     The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected
     document type for all line items. In this case at least two different
     companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does
     not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
     If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a
     document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please
     correct the entered account.
Actually what we done..........
1) In salary entry which was passed by HR payroll, we have distributed cost from company Code-2011 to another company code-5011.
2) Manse some staff in 2011 cost booked in another company code 5011.
3) in that way system passed automatic inter-company transaction, which is correct.
5) but while doing clearing of inter company GLs & other accounts wherever these type of document selected then system throwing above error.
Please guide use.

Hi
Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
Regardss
Michael

Error: Consolidated companies DCIUS and ' ' are different

Hi All,
When I try to post vendor invoice in FB60 I get the above given error . Message No. F5080.
I have created a group company and assigned to the expense GL account master in trading partner field.
GL is mapped to the group GL account.
No error is shown if I enter the group company id in the vendor master in the "trading partner" field.
But the vendor is not a cross company. My understanding is, we use the trading partner field in vendor master only if the vendor is an affiliated company.
What could be the reason for the error and how can I resolve this ?
Thanks
Anil

Hi Murali,
Thanks for your reply.
1. This is not an inter co postings. So I don't find any need to activate the same in doc type.
2. The error is shown only when I remove trading partner from vendor master (vendor is not a cross company).
3. Consolidation is required. But I have given the trading partner and group GL in all the GL accounts.
So I am at a loss why this error occurs.
Thanks
Anil

Consalidated companies 0 and are different

Hello Experts,
When I am processing with f-06 am getting the error consolidate companies 0 and ' ' are different.This is happening when it is with more than one customer.I have gone through some threads in forum but it is all about vendor and document type,but in my case it is when i use multiple customer.Please explain as to how i will proceed with that.
Thanks

Hello Binoj,
The message number is f5080
Diagnosis
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two differen companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.

Consolidated companies are different

Hi,
User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as consolidated companies are different. pls suggest.
Regards,
venki

Hi,
User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as "consolidated companies xxxx and " are different". pls suggest.
Regards,
venki

GRIR clearing: Different consolidation companies?

Hi All,
While trying to clear the GRIR account manually, I was trying to match two line items from one document to another document. They balance however, I'm not able to clear these as I get the following error:
'Consolidated companies WE1LC and ' ' are different"
I don't know Consolidation well, so it will be helpful if someone can tell me what to do and help me with how Consolidation is to be done.
Thanks,
Tejas

Thanks Sridhar! It worked!

F.13 clearing SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5 080 Consolidated companies UTCL and '

Hi All
I am getting the following error message while clearing customer transactions through F.13 and F-32
SAPMF05A 0131 S    F5 074 2 items were selected
SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5 080 Consolidated companies UTCL and ' ' are different
anyone can help in this?
rgds/Reddy
Edited by: kpkreddy on Aug 30, 2010 1:55 PM

Hi Reddy,
Please check the document type used in OBXH and select UMBUCHNG check for document type assigned there defalut is AB
ensure document type AB have Inter-company posting checked in OBA7
Edited by: Ravi Rana on Aug 30, 2010 2:15 PM

SEM-BCS how to make Consolidation Unit with Business Area

Hi all,
I am newbie in SEM-BCS and implementing BW-based BCS. Our situation is as follows.
Situation
- we have 7 companies worldwide and 4 different Business areas.
   Every company consists of at least two business areas in R/3.
- we have sales transaction in FI among companies.
requirement
- we need consolidated F/S in whole consolidation group and consolidated F/S in Business area level.
actually, we are planning to make the consolidation unit in company level.
Do we have to break down consolidation unit in business area? or just breakdown category solves our requirement?
If we have sales transaction even between business areas within certain company, do we have to make it in business area?

Following are the answer to your questions
Q:   What to do for using this cube in BCS?
A:    Add the business area to the cube. Generate the data basis and the business area gets added to all ODS/DSO , virtual cube.
Suggestion: To avoid deleting the Profit center cube, since you can reduce the complication.
Q:   Is it the problem about DATA BASIS Role?
A:   No. Assign the role of subassignment or consolidation unit as needed. If you are giving the role of consolidation unit to business area, you need to insert the char Partner business area also in the cube.
Q:   Is there some materials to solve this situation?
A:   Refer the matrix consolidation material in help.sap.com from BCS portion. As per SAP literature any relevant object can be made as second consolidation unit such as business area, functional area etc. Dont fear. Once you start it the issue will be resolved in few days.
Expected complication:
If you are going to make business area as subassignment then it is simple. But if you are making business area as Consolidation unit, go for partner business area in cube.
Ensure with your BI consultant that all BCS messages are addressed in BI infoobject for business area specifically.
Things can get complicated only if we allow for it get complicated. But you are doing great.. Keep posted.. Good luck.!!!..

F-04 posting error - Consolidated companies

Dear all,
I have a error message for a particular customer while posting using T Code - F-04, I got an error message saying - " Consolidated Companies XXXX & "" are different.
Samunder Singh

HI,
Can u explain the Scenerio for which your working, whether ur using Cosolidation for all company codes.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Utilization(J2IUN) in case of Sales plant and Mfg plants are different

Hello,
we are having two company codes 1000 and 2000,
1000 is having the Manufturing plant- 1000
2000 is having the sales plant - 2000
Both the plant are having the same excise group-10
The company will procure a materials in 1000 plant and CENVAT is credited at 1000 Plant. The 1000 plant never dispatch materials to customers, The company want to take Monthly utilization from 2000 company code and 2000 plant.
The company first make STO from 1000 plant to 2000 (Inter company STO), then 2000 company will sell that material to customer or delear or etc.
Manufaturing plant and disptach plants are different
How to take utilization in above said scenario.
Regards
sapman man

Hi
we are having two company codes 1000 and 2000,
1000 is having the Manufturing plant- 1000
2000 is having the sales plant - 2000
Both the plant are having the same excise group-10
The company will procure a materials in 1000 plant and CENVAT is credited at 1000 Plant. The 1000 plant never dispatch materials to customers, The company want to take Monthly utilization from 2000 company code and 2000 plant.
The company first make STO from 1000 plant to 2000 (Inter company STO), then 2000 company will sell that material to customer or delear or etc.
Manufaturing plant and disptach plants are different
How to take utilization in above said scenario.
As per above your input would like narrate as under.
As per SAP & Statutory norms Utilization is only happen when you avail credit and availing of credit is only possible when your plant is register with Excise thats only possible when you can declare your plant is in actively invloves in manfacturing activity ( Input and out put material will be differ) then you can register with Excise and get excise register the sam eyou can maintain in J1ID.
Now coming t your case which not possible as plant 2000 becomes Depot and depot scenario you can not utilize as you are not availing any input credit.
Son what you can do is pass the credit to 2000 plant and utilise in 1000 plants which is quite easy
And request you to create two different excise group as you can not assign same excise group to plant and deopt.
Hope this helps you

Asset Master Business Area Different, PO Business Area Different

Hi Experts,
When FI person creates asset master, he gives business area suppose 1000, plant 1000. But when we make po, somebody makes po in 2000 business area, plant 2000 and give 1000 business area asset master, and po saves and gr, miro done. In our case business area and plant nomenclature are same.
My question is system does not give any message, when somebody gives wrong asset master which is for different business area while creating PO. How can we check this.
Can anybody helps me.
Full points to helping answers.
Thanks
GR.

Hi experts.....
we have the same issue where our plants is our profitcenters.
user had created a asset Purchase order for plant 1000(P.C 1000) by refering asset master releated to P.C 2000, GRN, MIRO have done values have gone to PC 2000 instead of 1000, There is no way to cancel those documents MM & FI periods are closed so can u povide a solution for this case with out opening the periods.
And also require how to control this type of errors
thanks in advance
vardhan.k
Edited by: vardhan kopparappu on Aug 21, 2008 2:09 PM

Anyone knows the difference between this Protocol Encryption status or why there status are different?

I am confused why there Protocol Encryption Status are different from each other they are all using AnyConnect client v2.5.
user 1 - AnyConnect-Parent SSL-Tunnel RC4
user 2 - AnyConnect-Parent SSL-Tunnel DTLS-Tunnel RC4 AES128
user 3 - Clientless SSL-Tunnel DTLS-Tunnel (this user is using an AnyConnect client, but when she connects her status show Clientless)

The 17" MBP has an extra USB 2.0 port and also comes with a FireWire 800 port.
As far as the GPUs go, they are the same: ATi Mobility Radeon X1600.
As far as the GPU-dedicated-RAM (VRAM) goes, the only difference is the amount (128MB vs 256MB). More VRAM is better if you are going to be running video intensive apps, eg. multimedia apps and/or 3D games. The VRAM is GDDR3 which provides greater bandwidth than the DDR2 technology used in the 512MB/1GB/2GB of 'main memory'.
There is, of course, the different CPU multipliers. The 1.83GHz has an 11x multiplier while the 2.00GHz has a 12x multiplier. The 2.16GHz CPU of the 17" MBP has a 13x CPU multiplier.
The Front Side Bus speed is the same 667MHz on all three models. It drops down to 167MHz at the boundary of the CPU to which is applied the above multipliers, ie:
667MHz FSB / 4 = 167MHz
167MHz x 11 = 1.83GHz
167MHz x 12 = 2.00GHz
167MHz x 13 = 2.16GHz
N.B. 167MHz is really 1000/6.

I recently upgraded to iWork v9.0.3, but when I access each applications the versions are different (i.e. Pages V.4.1, Numbers V2.6, Keynote V5.1.1) with a install date of 3/18/09 -- which is not the current install date of 2 weeks ago. Why?

I recently upgraded to iWork v9.0.3, but when I access each applications the versions are different (i.e. Pages V.4.1, Numbers V2.6, Keynote V5.1.1) with a install date of 3/18/09 -- which is not the current install date of 2 weeks ago. Shouldn't Pages, Numbers, and Keynote show version 9.?? My MAC confirned installation of v9.0.3 and even accepted the software code. With this discrepancy, how can I determine if the latest was installed and operational? I even downloading v9.0.4, 9.0.5, and 9.1. When I tried installing these downloads it popped up note stating that a later version of Keynote was already installed.

You used the data. Verizon can not see what it was sued for. However your phone can see whats apps used the data. go to settings-data usage- there will be a place that says data usage cycle. line the dates up with your cycle. then there will be a bar graph below that extend bother white bars one all the way to the left and one all the way to the right. after those are extended below that will be a list of apps, there should be one that used over 2 gb and that will show you what app used that data in her purse

Consolidated companies 1000, 1500 are different

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for