GRIR clearing: Different consolidation companies?

Hi All,
While trying to clear the GRIR account manually, I was trying to match two line items from one document to another document. They balance however, I'm not able to clear these as I get the following error:
'Consolidated companies WE1LC and ' ' are different"
I don't know Consolidation well, so it will be helpful if someone can tell me what to do and help me with how Consolidation is to be done.
Thanks,
Tejas

Thanks Sridhar! It worked!

Similar Messages

  • Error through F-44 that  Consolidated  companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Dear Expert
    At the time of Vendor clearing through F-44 I get the
    warning message that "Withholding tax information ignored"
    where Withholding tax related customization and master has
    been updated accordingly. If I ignore the same warning
    and save the document as my all Debit and Credit transactions
    are of equal amount ,i m getting the error that "Consolidated
    companies 1000 and ' ' are different.
    What specific setting is required for the same.
    Thanks in advance
    VG

    Hi,
    If you are getting error F5 080 then most probably this is because one of the documents to be cleared contains a different trading partner (field BSEG-VBUND).
    Please check the contents of each customer/vendor line item concerning this field. The field can be viewed on the customer/vendor line item via button 'more data'. If the contents is different you have either to clear the items individually or you have to change the settings of the document type used for clearing.  You can find out what document type is used for clearing in OBXH in the 'transfer with postings section'.  Afterwards you can go to OBA7 and mark the flags 'Inter-company postings' and 'Enter trading partner'.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • F.13 clearing SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5  080 Consolidated companies UTCL and '

    Hi All
    I am getting the following error message while clearing customer transactions through F.13 and F-32
    SAPMF05A 0131 S    F5  074 2 items were selected
    SAPMF05A 0700 E    F5  080 Consolidated companies UTCL and ' ' are different
    anyone can help in this?
    rgds/Reddy
    Edited by: kpkreddy on Aug 30, 2010 1:55 PM

    Hi Reddy,
    Please check the document type used in OBXH and select UMBUCHNG check for document type assigned there defalut is AB
    ensure document type AB have Inter-company posting checked in OBA7
    Edited by: Ravi Rana on Aug 30, 2010 2:15 PM

  • Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different

    Hi team,
    While clearing TDS Salary GL system showing below error
    Consolidated companies KGOI and ' ' are different
         Message no. F5080
    Diagnosis
         The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected
         document type for all line items. In this case at least two different
         companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does
         not belong to a company are stated.
    Procedure
         If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a
         document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please
         correct the entered account.
    Actually what we done..........
    1) In salary entry which was passed by HR payroll, we have distributed cost from company Code-2011 to another company code-5011.
    2) Manse some staff in 2011 cost booked in another company code 5011.
    3) in that way system passed automatic inter-company transaction, which is correct.
    5) but while doing clearing of inter company GLs & other accounts wherever these type of document selected then system throwing above error.
    Please guide use.

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Can anyone tell me the how to solve this error "Consolidated companies 1000 and ' ' are different"  which I am getting in F-04
    Thanks,
    Madan

    Hi
    Yes you are correct, transports required through to production for this.
    The side affect of this I think is that if there are any documents (containing the document types that you have chnaged) posted while this chnage is in production, it would mean that those documents would be populated by the Partner Business Place (ie second company code) in their header record if they cross company codes. That would mean that they could then later be cleared from the second company code against the first. Also when changing the Intra Posting flag on the documnet type do an F1 Help on the filed and consider the SAPHelp on that topic.
    Overall I don't think this would be a big issue. But anyway if you transport this through at a period that is planned as low system activity this should ensure you don't post any docs while the chnage is in place and youy are doing the clearing.
    Regardss
    Michael

  • Consolidated companies 1000, 1500 are different

    hi ,
    when tried to do PGI(post goods issue) i am getting the below error
    "consolidated companies (1000, 1500) are different ".
    please suggest me .
    regards,
    deepa

    PGI is the point where FI entries related to goods getting delivered are genereated.
    Normally Finished Goods and Cost of Goods Sold GL of the same comapny are hit.
    I guess in the particular case Finished Goods GL of one company code and cost of goods sold of different company is getting hit.
    Thanks,
    Ashish

  • Consolidated companies are different

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as consolidated companies are different. pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

    Hi,
    User is trying to make an invoice through MIRO, he is getting the error as "consolidated companies xxxx and " are different". pls suggest.
    Regards,
    venki

  • Account assignment deatils of PO in GRIR clearing line item

    Hi
    Can we get the account assignment details from purchase order in line item of GRIR clearing account at the time of Goods receipt? We have created a purchase order with account assignment a WBS element. At the time of goods receipt the WBS element is appearing in P&L account but it’s not in GRIR clearing account but at the time of Invoice verification (MIRO) the WBS element updated in the line item of GRIR clearing account.
    Thanks and Regards
    Vinay Thakre

    Hi...
    I'm rather new but maybe my ideas can help you.
    Have you maintained a warehouse for this plant? (In my company some plants don't have) Is there a G/L account assigned?(I think this can be configured, because we have at least 3 different) Is maybe the material blocked for warehouse? (we have materials that are for direct consumption only).
    Just ideas.
    Regards, good luck. Paul

  • Acct assignment required for GRIR clearing

    Hi,
    User was performing GRIR clearing and has the following error :
    "...require G/L 600008 to match to an assignment..."
    When checked under OKB9, the company code has 2 plants assigned to 2 different cost centers for this GL acct / cost element.
    Please advise.
    thanks.
    Angel.

    Hi
    Can you specify the full Text of the message and also the message no
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • GRIR clearing not happening

    Friends,
    I am facing the following problem. Please help me out
    While GR is made, vendor number is updated agaist each line item, i.e, 'inventory debit line item' and 'GRIR clearing line item' each has the vendor number.
    But while doing MIRO,
    only the line item for 'Vendor account debit' is having the vendor number against it . The 'GRIR clearing credit' line item is not having the vendor number against it. This is creating problem. We need to configure so that the vendor number is copied against this line item also.
    Beacause of this , the GRIR clearing account is not cleared automatically.
    Can anybody suggest what is to be done so that the vendor number is also updated in the accounting document generated while posting invoice (MIRO)

    Hi,
    the standard practice is just Assignment (ZUONR) which is in turn sort key 014 (PO + line). Re vendor, see my previous post. Re business area, that should not be a problem at all as the business area should be derived from the plant which is the same in the GR and in the IR documents, so if the PO line is the same, the BA cannot be different. Same is true for material, it is either empty (service PO's) or the same in GR and IR.
    There is one more thing to mention here: if you are using goods receipt based invioce verification (flag in he PO line, Delivery tab), then the matching of the GR/IR items should not be made on PO line level (= assignment), but also based on the goods receipt document number. I.e, an invoice must be assigned to a particular GR (and not to any GR). This is typical for scheduling agreements. Pls. refer to the F1-help on the checkbox "GR/IR account special process." on the selection screen of F.13, it should explain very well how it is working. No additional setup needed here, so the above are still valid: use only ZUONR and nothing else as the clearing criteria for GR/IR accounts.
    Hope that helps, points welcome
    Csaba

  • F-04 posting error - Consolidated companies

    Dear all,
    I have a error message for a particular customer while posting using T Code - F-04, I got an error message saying - " Consolidated Companies XXXX & "" are different.
    Samunder Singh

    HI,
    Can u explain the Scenerio for which your working, whether ur using Cosolidation for all company codes.
    Regards,
    Sreekanth

  • F.19  (Analyz GRIR Clearing..) picking up non-open item

    Dear People,
    1. For a particular Co Code, the GRIR was not set as an Open Item Management account.
    2. A GR was posted on 14.5.2008.
    3. On 9.6.2008, the GRIR account was changed to an Open Item Management account by zerorising the account and reposting the GR above through journal.
    4. on 13.6.2008 LIV was done and it was cleared against the item posted in (3) above.
    5. At this time no postings are generated by F.19 (Analyz GRIR Clearing..) since there are no open items left in GRIR account.
    6. But after one year, in August 2009, F.19 suddenly picks item 2 as Goods Rec Not Inv. although this item is not an open item and it has already been cleared in 4 above. And this had been going on until now.
    Any idea why this happened? Is it caused by certain Support Package updates?
    Thank you very much.
    Edited by: Darth Maut on Jan 13, 2010 12:56 PM

    Dear People,
    1. For a particular Co Code, the GRIR was not set as an Open Item Management account.
    2. A GR was posted on 14.5.2008.
    3. On 9.6.2008, the GRIR account was changed to an Open Item Management account by zerorising the account and reposting the GR above through journal.
    4. on 13.6.2008 LIV was done and it was cleared against the item posted in (3) above.
    5. At this time no postings are generated by F.19 (Analyz GRIR Clearing..) since there are no open items left in GRIR account.
    6. But after one year, in August 2009, F.19 suddenly picks item 2 as Goods Rec Not Inv. although this item is not an open item and it has already been cleared in 4 above. And this had been going on until now.
    Any idea why this happened? Is it caused by certain Support Package updates?
    Thank you very much.
    Edited by: Darth Maut on Jan 13, 2010 12:56 PM

  • Fixed Assets - Calc of monthly depreciation charge after GRIR clearing

    Hi all,
    For a particular asset in our company - this asset was to be written off in November 2005.
    GRIR clearing was done on asset xxx in September and then reversed in the same month.
    The net effect on the asset value was zero but this caused SAP to recalculate the depreciation charge from the start of the year. It appears to have ignored the reversal and wants to write back amount x(months Jan to Aug) and charge amount y(chg for Sep).  Also for some reason this has appeared in November and not September, the month of posting the GRIR clearing.
    The asset in question should have reached the end of it's useful life in November but the re-calculation of depreciation would have resulted in depreciation being charged for a further 7 months in 2006. The manual work around was to change the depreciation key to xxxx to force SAP to calculate the "expected" charge for November. This has worked in this particular instance but is not ideal, running depreciation run again is not the solution to this type of problem.  
    User wants to know if using the MR11 transaction (GRIR reversal for PO)will always cause SAP to re-calculate depreciation from the start of the year.
    Sorry for long post - have tried to give as many details as possible.
    Any ideas / comments  /thoughts - please do reply
    Many thanks in advance
    Rahul Kochhar

    Search in Revalution on this forum and look to the SAP help. Then you have all the information you need to set this up.
    Search on revaluation and AR29 - Post Revaluation

  • Tcode F.19 and program  RFWERE00 - Analyze GRIR Clearing accounts

    Friends,
    My client requirement is to include the field WBS Element in the report - Analyze GRIR Clearing accounts (F.19).
    Also how to capture the WBS Element assigned to a PO at the time of Goods receipt in the GRIR account.
    Please do the needful.
    Regards
    SELVA

    Hi,
      I don't think that is possible using SAP Standard.
      You may try out with Enhancement concept if you are in Updated version in SAP standard or you can
      go for a Custom program if vendor designation and code is requried.
    Regards,
    Devendra.

  • Pass single entry for GRIR clearing

    Dear Expert,
    I want single entry for GRIR clearing by F.13 in spite of multiple Clearing entries, can anyone tell me how to configure this?
    Regards,
    Saurabh Chaplot

    Hi
    System groups the items based on clearing criteria in OB74. The purpose of this setup is to correctly match the open items during clearing. If this is not the case, open items cannot be related to open Purchase orders. If this requirement is only for specific cases, then better use manual classic clearing transactions.

Maybe you are looking for