Control the Posting of Quantity through Usage Decision

Hi Qm Gurus,
   How will i control the posting of quantities from quality inspection to any types of stock? For instance, If the Usage Decision Code made is Rejected, how will the user be controlled or prompted to post quantities only to blocked stock and not to unrestricted or any types; without viewing the Manager's Usage Decision "Rejected".This is very crucial to pharmaindustries because normally, the manager is the one who made the usage decision, and the rank and file will be assigned to post the quantities. how shall this be resolved. Hope anybody can help me. if possible teach me on how to configure this, and there tcodes to be used by different users. I think Qa11 by manager.
Regards,
Matildo, edsel
Qm Consultant

Dear Murugsan,
Can i control the posting of qty from UD in storage location level e.g. if a user give the UD from Q/INSP. location (1701) & by mistake he does not change the location TO (2500 BSR) then system put the qty in 1701(unrestricted) my requirement is that system by default pick the 2500 location if UD is given for acceptance as OK.I have seen your reply to another similar type of requirement but does not find any storage location option in QS51.
R SEHGAL

Similar Messages

  • Issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision

    Hi all,
    I have an issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision. Please find below the details.
    Inspection Lot  10000604689
    Material        1730PCPBS.0031
    Batch           QP611097      GQ02
    Out of total qty of 2100 we need to post the following
    To unrestricted use                     2,098
    To sample usage                         2
    Following error appears,
    Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 1,638 NO : 1730PCPBS.0031 62GQ GQ02 QP611097
    Message no. M7021
    Diagnosis
    Shortfall below the specified stock level or quantity amounting to 1,638 NO.
    System Response
    If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
    If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
    Procedure
    In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
    In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
    I have checked that quantity 2100 of material 1730PCPBS.0031 is in QI stock. Kindly advice what is the issue and why we are getting the error?
    Regards,
    Brijesh

    Hi Brijesh,
    What is the status of inspection lot?
    One of the possibilities I think could be inconsistencies between MM and QM.
    Have a look on SAP note 48815- Checking possible inconsistencies between MM and QM.
    Regards,
    Anand Rao

  • Reversal of 122 which will be posted through usage decision

    Hi expert
                i have done mistakenly  Usage decision of Semi finished product against order and post stock  122 (return to vendor) through usage decision. Now i want to reverse document  123( reversal of return to vendor)  but when i am going to reverse the document a message will be appear
    Document cannot be processed
    Kindly elaborate me
    Thanks
    Regards
    Priya Sharma

    cancellation of 122 movement type will automatically post for 123 ie reversal of returns to vendor through MIGO.
    This movement type has the same effects as movement type 101.Alternatively you can use MB1b->123->create 01 inspection type for this

  • Control the Post Date  when use BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC to PGI !

    Dear all,
       How can I control the Post Date (WADAT_IST) when I use BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC to PGI?
    Thanks to help me.

    In ECC 6.0, I used this BAPI to perform the picking using this way:
    1. Implement enhancement point  BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_D01 in enhancemnt spot ES_SAPLV50I to set the update picking flag on delivery control structure.
    GS_DLV_BAPI_CONTROL-UPDATE_PICKING = 'X'
    2. Implement enhancement of standard BADI SMOD_V50B0001. Use method EXIT_SAPLV50I_004 to loop at table CT_VBPOK and update the fields VBELN and POSNN with suitable values.
    There is one problem with this solution, though.  The delivery quantity cannot be updated.  Any increase in the delivery qty ITEM_DATA-DLV_QTY actually updates the picked quantity on the delivery.  Consequently, there is little practical use of this technique.
    John

  • Profile parameter to control the data valume going through PI

    Dear all,
    Now I'm doing the stress test on PI and found that some error occurs when executing the test of about 16MB data volume.
    Does anyone know some profile parameters (RZ10/RZ11 or someting like that ) to control the data valume going through PI ?
    Regards,
    Hideki Kozai

    Hi Hideki,
      In your XI system, use T Code SXMB_ADM.....got to Integration Engine Configuration....select category-> Runtime...there u will find a parameter MAX_MESSAGE_TRANSFER_SIZE which enables you to set the maximum size in MB of the message packages to be transferred from one system to another in a message transfer....u can set values upto 100 MB.
    Another important parameter is EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT, u will find this in category Tuning....this parameter enables serial processing....also it is is designed to improve performance since there is often not enough memory to process multiple large messages simultaneously......possible values is 0 - 2,097,151 (KB).
    Regds,
    Pinangshuk.

  • Automatic derivation of service tax (derived flow) flow during the posting of charges through FWBS in Security Module.

    Hi
    Case: Automatic derivation of service tax (derived flow) flow during the posting of charges through FWBS in Security Module.
    I am trying  to post the charges using Manual Posting FWBS but system not generating (automatically)  derived flow for the service tax flow on charges.
    I have done below mentioned  steps for configuration:
    Define the derivation procedure and Rules.
    Assign the update type to the function of security account management.- Define update type fo manual posting.
    Kindly advise.
    Regards

    Hi,
    The definition of "Define Derivation Procedures and Rules" for derived flows are only taken into account during transaction management, deriving one flow type from origin flow type. This customizing does not have effect for FWBS. You may check the below customizing:
    1) Transaction Manager > Securities > Master Data > Product Types > Define Company Code-Dependent Settings for the Product Type: mark the indicator "Generate taxes" in Settings for tax generation.
    2) Transaction Manager > Securities > Position Management  > Securities Account Management > Define Tax Rates.
    Further you may consider the implementation of BAdI TPM_TAX_CALCULATION (please see note 1159408) to calculate the tax depending on your requirements. Note: the above BAdI is called only in the case the required settings are done in 'Define Tax Rates' in the Customizing.
    Best regards,
    Jasmine

  • How to control the  authorization of IM05 through  authorization object

    Now we want to control the  authorization of IM05 through  authorization object C_PRPS_USR, but C_PRPS_USR is not assigned to tcode im05.How can we assign authorization object C_PRPS_USR to tcode im05? OR do we have any other method to obtain the same result?

    write a factory method that controls the number of instances for you:
    import java.util.List;
    import java.util.Arrays;
    public class Bar
       private static final int MAX_BARS = 5;
       private static int numBars = 0;
       private int id;
       public static void main(String [] args)
          try
             int numBars = ((args.length > 0) ? Integer.parseInt(args[0]) : MAX_BARS+1);
             Bar [] bars = new Bar[numBars];
             for (int i = 0; i < bars.length; ++i)
                bars[i] = Bar.create();
             System.out.println(Arrays.asList(bars));
          catch (Exception e)
             e.printStackTrace();
       private Bar() { this.id = numBars++; }
       public String toString() { return "I am bar number " + this.id; }
       public static Bar create()
          Bar nextBar = null;
          if (numBars < MAX_BARS)
             nextBar = new Bar();
          return nextBar;
    }%

  • AFS-QM Error in stock posting performed by taking Usage decision

    Hi all,
    during stock posting with 105 mov type performed by taking Usage Decision (QA11), I faced with a strange system behavior, described beneath.
    Previuos steps:
    Purchase order creation
    Partial Good receipt performed by MIGO, mov type 103 (Blocked stock from PO)
    Automatic Creation of Inspection Lot
    Error encountered:
    If I take usage decision (QA11) for the inspection lot created, putting the stock checked in Unrestricted Use (correspondant mov type = 105), in the following good receipt (related to the same purchase order), the incoming stock available is less of the real quantity, previously accepted..
    After some checks we understood that with 105 mov type the system doubles the real quantity previoulsy accepted, acting in the following manner:
    Initial PO: 100 PZ
    1° Good receipt: 30 PZ
    (automatic creation of inspection lot)
    If we take a usage decision, posting stock to unrestricted use (mov type 105), in the 2° Good receipt, the quantity available from the same PO is not 70 PZ (100 - 30), but only 40 PZ ! !  (100 - (30 * 2)) = 40
    Please note that it does not occur if we post stock (always 105 mov type) with a MIGO transaction, so we are forced to think that the problem is strictly related to AFS-QM inventory posting, and not to 105 mov type or inbounding process.
    Thanks for your collaboration,
    Regards,
    Ale

    I'm not familiar with the specific apparel and footwear solution but with regards to QM, if you are using the standard SAP delivered stock postings, it should use 105 to accept the material to unrestricted for the GR blocked. 
    I would first use MB51 for the material and batch and review all the material movement documents.  Look at the trail of movements and try to see where the changes happen.
    In your example, what did the unrestricted inventory and GR blocked inventory show as stock levels?
    I'd also check OSS for issues related to AFS/QM.  This is not new functionality in SAP so I would be surprised if this was an actual bug or problem in the system that hasn't been seen before.
    FF

  • Transfer Posting error upon u201CQM Usage Decision with WM HUu201D

    Hello,
    I am switching from the SAP system u201CUsing MIGO with WM (no SU) and Inspection Lot processingu201D to a process using u201CInbound Delivery with WM-HU and Inspection Lot processingu201D.
    For e.g. I have a material with 10 pcs packed in one HU, PGRd and putaway. Inspection Lot is created for the HU containing 10 pcs. I am ideally hoping to do Posting change of 6 pcs to Unrestricted (with underlying mvmt typ 321) and Transfer Posting of 4 pcs to Qty. for Sample usage (with underlying mvmt typ 331).
    In QA11, when I select posting key u201CVMENGE01 To Unrestricted useu201D, I get the error message u201CHandling Unit is locked. No assignment possible. Message No. HUFUNCTIONS007u201D. (I donu2019t have any document open to cause locking).
    When I select posting key u201CVMENGE03 Qty. for Sample usageu201D, I get the error message u201CHandling Unit is locked. No assignment possible. Message No. QHU17u201D.
    Here is the status in u201CInspection Lot Stocku201D tab of QA11.
    u2022     Inspection Lot Qty.: 10 pcs
    u2022     Sample size: 4 pcs
    u2022     Status for u201CHU Transfer Postingu201D is Green
    I am currently doing GR first and then putaway. Though I am open to doing putaway and then do PGR, if that can help, in any way.
    Can anyone please help me with this issue? Please let me know if I need to provide more info. Thanks for your help in advance.

    hi
    I did GR for 10 PCs with serial numbers. During QM, when usage decision, in the tab "Inspection lot stock", I input 8 PCs to the unres, 2 to blocked stock.
    Upon posting, system pops up a Serial Number dialog showing "TF quality to unrest" with No. serial no is 10/8, and a list of 10 serial numbers.
    I select 8 serial to post to unres. But still, the system keeps having error "Exactly 8 serial numbers must be selected (instead of 10)"...
    This error is dur to
    You have selected 28 to U/r & rest you want to put to Block.
    so what system does is by default it will select first U/R qty which is 8.
    While stock posting it is showing 10 Sr numbers.out of which you have to select 8 for U/R.
    so only select those 2 numbers which you want to put to block...Click on delet(bucket)
    now only 8 will remain which you wnat to put to U/R.
    select all 8 and click on ok
    save.
    Rest of the 2 Sr number will automatically move to unrestricted.
    This is how sap in UD works for Sr nos.
    This will solve your problem.
    Regards
    Sujit

  • Reset Usage Decision and reverse posting in tcode QA12

    Hi Friends,
    I have a requirement to reset usage decision by creating a customer funtion button in tcode QA12 and reverse the posting quantity from restricted area to to be posted area.
    I have implemented SAP Note# 175842.So now decision is getting reset but for reverse posting, i need to run RQEVAC50 program separately.But i need it in one go,like if user presses 'customer function' button, system should both reset the decision as well as reverse the posting quantity.
    Can anybody tell me how to do this...
    Many Thanks,
    Madhu

    I am not sure but I have tried the same thing combining is possible when you do not have any stock posting praposal for selected set of UD.
    What you have to do is make a separate program where implement aforesaid SAP note( as suggested in the note) and in the same program call for the screen to cancel the Usage decision(Read the user exit carefully)
    QEVA0008-->Usage decision: Customer function key (e.g. to cancel UD) you can create a routine to call the screen & make changes in the background.
    Seek help of Abaper !!

  • USAGE Decision required before stock posting

    Hi QM Gurus!
    How do i configure the system so that it will require the user to ENTER A USAGE DECISION for a inspection lot  first before he can make a posting in the INSPECTION LOT STOCK TAB in the same screen.
    the requirement is that the user cannot make any postings from QM without making a usage decision.
    I would appreciate any help.
    Thank you,
    Heinrick Palad

    Hi,
    The same can be acheived by creating a status profile with suitable object type (Insp. lot with or w/o plan or char.)using "BS02" & assign it to the Inspection type.
    In the user status create an initial status say "INIT' & click on "Forbidden" against "Start inv. pstg bef. UsageDec". Create a second status say "UDAL' & click on "Set" against "Make usage decision".
    This will surely solve your problem. Just test & revert.
    Reward points if useful.
    Rgds,
    Srini
    Edited by: Srini k on Dec 17, 2007 1:24 PM

  • Posting after making usage decision-QM

    hi all,
    i have done the usage decision and posted only partial quantities, then how can i post the remaining materials in to unrestricted stock.
    regards
    thyagarajan

    Thyagarajan,
    In QA32 transaction selct the lot, click on Usage Decision button. In the Insp Stock posting tab page enter the remaining qty and save.
    While selecting the lot in the initail screen choose the radio button "Lots with Usage Decision" or "All Inspection Lots".
    Regards
    Ram
    Message was edited by:
            Ramanujan Chitrakootam

  • To control the frequency of Idocs to be posted in SAP

    Hi,
    Our scenario is from flat file to Idoc,When Idoc is getting posted,it is invoking BAPI.
    Idocs are getting posted frequently.
    In our case whts is happening,when one Idoc is posted,The BAPI will be locked by that Idoc,when 2,3 and 4th,etc.Idocs will come then those Idocs are failing as BAPI is locked by the first Idoc.Is there any way in XI with which we can control the posting of Idocs in SAP,So that all the Idocs will be getting posted successfully and BAPI will not be locked when the 2,3 and 4th,etc. will come?
    Best Regards,
    Harleen Kaur Chadha

    Hi !
    By definition the incoming IDOCs in ECC should go to a queue, to avoid blocking calls and make an asynchronous scenario. Then ECC will process each IDOC of the queue when the resources are available.
    Maybe I just don't understand how this BAPI is affecting the idocs that come after the first one with problems. What are the problem syntoms? any error message? XI should be able to send all IDOCs to ECC without failing and then ECC should process them in without affecting XI.
    If you go to tn BD87 in ECC, what are the statuses of the IDOCs?
    Are you using a standard IDOC ? is your BAPI stateless?
    Regards,
    Matias.
    Edited by: Matias Denker on Jan 7, 2008 11:51 AM

  • Automatic Usage Decision

    Dear all,
    There is this checkbox control in the inspection type setup in the material master, called u201CAutomatic UDu201D.
    It said:
    If you set this indicator, the system can automatically make usage decisions for inspection lots.
    The inspection lots must meet the following conditions:
    u2022     All characteristics have been completed
    u2022     None of the characteristics have been rejected
    u2022     No defects have been recorded, or No quality notifications created
    u2022     The waiting time set in Customizing must have elapsed.
    Yet when I test a scenario in which the inspection characteristic has been valuated as accepted and close (i.e. no rejected), and no defect is recorded.
    However, the valuation Code field shown u201CNot Valuatedu201D, and the UD code field is blank in this inspection lot overview (i.e. QA03).
    Shouldnu2019t the usage decision should take place automatically on this since I have fulfill the requirement on the setup? Did I miss out anything?
    Thanks
    YY

    Hi
    1.What is setting at plant level you have done for Skip lot?
    2.Status of all char must be 5
    3.Have you done scheduling through QA10
    or QA16.
    4.Schedule must run in background.
    just making char skips & tick on "Skip" in QM view will not take auto UD
    Regards
    Sujit

  • Solution to Non-Reversal of Usage Decision

    Hi Experts,
    I have facing an Issue over Goods movement .
    Issue is User has done GR against PO using Transaction MIGO with mvmt Type - 101 and GR is posted to Quality stock for inspection , there user has accepted the usage Decision using QA32 and posted the Stock to Unrestricted using movement type -321. But Now they want to cancel the GR earlier done because they have posted wrong Quantity.
    Now since reversal of UD is not a standard solution and also is not a immediate solution to this problem, so what solution i should suggest to client to have his requirement fulfilled for this Issue without doing reversal of UD. We can think of Developing Zprogram of reversal of UD later.
    your response will be appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    kaushik Ghosh

    It is time to correct something.
    first of all the initial question was already a frequently discussed question.
    The question " will any accounting entries get effected" is again a basic and frequently discussed question.
    You have to search before posting - this is a rule in SCN
    Unfortunately I was not present to reject this question right away, as this would have been a better solution, as it had forced you to search. But rejecting it now will only create damage since you got wrong advice.
    Not sure where all these myths come from and why they are spread.
    A return is something quite different from a cancellation, even that both lead to zero stock at the end, a return is used in external processing, it is about sending materials back to your vendor, a cancellation of a receipt is pure internal processing to correct a wrong entered value (no physical movement). It is statistically not the same, receiving and cancelling it again is just as good as not received anything as it nullifies. Receiving and doing a return are different processes , an inbound and an outbound process, it is visible separately. It is taken into account in vendor evaluation.
    To cancel the receipt movement after the usage decision you can use MIGO, but do not choose cancel material document, because the material document only knows that the stock is in quality status, which is not the case anymore after a usage decision.
    just do again goods receipt - reference to PO - but change then the movement type to the cancellation movement type (102).
    Then goto the detail into WHERE tab and change status to the stock status your stock has right now.
    Do you really think that "Developing Zprogram of reversal of UD" would do any good (or just create inconsistencies) if the processes and basic handling of MIGO are not even understood?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Flatfile to XML

    Hello Everybody, My scenario is SFTP -> Proxy: Input File will look like this: "ET-00.0001";"BOSSARD";"3062096 "ET-00.0001";"BOSSARD";"3062096 "ET-00.0001";"BOSSARD";"3062096 Output structure should look like this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8

  • HOw do I create a ringtone for iphone5 using the new itunes

    How can I create a ringtone for my iphone 5 using the newest version of itunes. Thanks

  • Save as EPS and maintain layers?

    Hi, Is it possible to save a .psd file as a .eps and maintain the layers? When I convert the file to EPS, the layers are merged. I don't see an option in the "Save As" process that would prevent this from happning. Thanks!

  • How to configare in SLD in web as java in Portal ?

    hi Experts   I configare in sld in Web As Java, But it's not configare; plz send the in details Regards & Thanks chandu

  • Upgrading my MacBook Pro?

    I bought my MacBook Pro at the beginning of last summer and it worked great for a while and still runs pretty decent. However I run a lot of programs at once (Flash 8, Photoshop CS2, Illustrator CS2, Dreamweaver 8 etc..) and I would like to know if i