Control wss_loggin database size

HI
in my sharepoint farm wss_logging database size is increasing how i control it,
also its log file size also increasing
Drives used for SQL databases are running out of free space.
Severity
1 - Error
Category
Availability
Explanation
The following databases have one or more files that may exceed the available free drive space. If this happens, operations will start to fail. SharePoint_Config on xyzDB01, WSS_Logging on xyzDB01
Remedy
Examine the drives containing the specified databases' log and data files. Free space on these drives or move the database files to another drive. A drive should have enough free space for the largest database file on it to autogrow twice.
For more information about this rule, see "http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=163560".
Failing Servers
Failing Services
SPTimerService (SPTimerV4)
also i am receiving errors in event viewer.
The Execute method of job definition Microsoft.SharePoint.Diagnostics.SPWebFrontEndDiagnosticsPerformanceCounterProvider (ID 8c11b823-ae23-4e4f-bd05-1bd1f2b3a048) threw an exception. More information is included below.
Could not allocate a new page for database 'WSS_Logging' because of insufficient disk space in filegroup 'PRIMARY'. Create the necessary space by dropping objects in the filegroup, adding additional files to the filegroup, or setting autogrowth on for existing
files in the filegroup.
adil

Hi Greetings.
pls check this link
http://www.toddklindt.com/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=400
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/c7011765-c6bf-451c-aabc-6b1a53cace16/how-do-i-reduce-the-size-of-the-wsslogging-database
Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' on the answer if it helps you

Similar Messages

Database size unavailable in Grid Control

On one of the 10g databases that I monitoring through Grid Control, under space summary, its shows the database size as Unavailable. When I open up db console, it does show the size of the database but not under Grid Control. Please help!
Edited by: zee_dba on Oct 15, 2009 7:34 AM

Agent is up and running. I was getting Metrics "Current Open Cursors Count" error. After increasing the open_cursor parameter, I got rid of that error, restarted the agent, but still the database size is unavailable.
Database Size (GB) Unavailable
Problem Tablespaces 0
Segment Advisor Recommendations 62
Space Violations 1
Dump Area Used (%) 81

Sharepoint 2010 - configuration database size limit

Hi,
We have below scenario in our production farm. Ours is a SharePoint 2010 Enterprise Edition server.
Medium size farm (4 WFE, 4 App Servers, Content DBs in separate tier. No SharePoint search in this farm)
Configuration DB reached 250+ GB. Please clarify below queries.
1. What is the boundary limit for configuration database size?
2. How we can scale the configuration database?
3. Can we add multiple configuration database per farm?
4. What are the best practices and regular maintenance activities to be done to keep the configuration db size under control?
It would be really really great if someone gives some good knowledge in this area.

1) Not aware of one
2) You can add multiple files to the file group
3) No
Is the growth in the MDF or the LDF (log file)? If it is in the log file, are you using high availability (Clustering, Mirroring, Log Shipping, AlwaysOn)? If so, you need to run a BACKUP LOG periodically to maintain the LDF size, or allow you to truncate
the LDF.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Target database size limit to monitor

Hi,
What is the Maximum database size OEM 10g Grid Control can monitor?
Regards,
msen

I dont think there is limitation on GC for db size. It's monitoring tool. I dont think they have any limitations.

Should We consider Temp Data Files While Estimating The Database Size

Hi,
The Database Size is sum of physical files like
Control file
redo log file
datafiles
temp files
so i want to know why are we considering the temp files..Because it's temporary. At one stage of database, temp size it could me more and at one stage it could be less.
So why consider the temp file???
Please share your views on it..
Thanks
Umesh

So, in essence the size of your datafiles is the size of your tablespaces?No. The size of the tablespace is the sum of the sizes of the datafiles in the tablespace --- i.e. the datafiles determine the tablespace size, not the other way round.
(Although when you CREATE or ALTER TABLESPACE, you specify the sizes of the datafiles that you want to belong to the tablespace).
the temporary tablespace has space allocated to it regardless of whether there are temporary tables in that tablespace or not.Two points here :
1. On most OSs the temporary tablespace tempfile is created as a "sparse" file. So, if you issue a CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE TEMP TEMPFILE 'xyz.dbf' SIZE 1000M; and then did an "ls -l" at the OS level, "xyz.dbf' would appear to be only a few tens of KBs in size. The OS "grows" the file to 1000M as necessary.
When talking to your OS administrator ensure that you get 1000M (or the AUTOEXTEND MAXSIZE !!) space allocated even though he might "see" only a few 10s of KBs used on the first day.
2. The temporary tablespace does not have objects (other than "global temporary tables" that overflow from memory to disk). It is really temporary space for joins, sorts, order bys etc.
So, your datafile size is not affected regardless of your temporary tables coming and going.Yes, your datafile sizes and tempfile sizes are independent. Yet, when "sizing" disk space for the database you must include the tempfile size. However, when reporting to IT Management with a statement "our database size is ".. you might want to break it up into components like Data Dictionary, Tables, Indexes, TemporarySpace, RedoLogs and ArchiveLogs. You could also differentiate between OS-allocated space (sizes of datafiles) and Oracle-allocated space (sizes of segments) and actual used space (which you'd have to compute !) .
Hemant K Chitale
Edited by: Hemant K Chitale on Feb 17, 2011 10:42 PM
Added (Although ....) paragraph to first point.

SQL azure database size not dropping down after deleting all table

Dear all,
I have a simple database on Azure for which I have deleted all table data. The size of the database is still showing 5Mb of data and I am charge for that. I have heard that this may happen from cluster index getting fragmented.
I have run a querry I found on internet on all my table index to show percentage of fragmentation and all report 0%.
DBA is not so my job but what could it be or how can I reduce that size ?
ON premise I would use COMPACT DB but not available in azure like some others DB action
Thnaks for tips
regards

user created objects/data are not the only ones stored in your database. you got system objects and metadata as Mike mentions above.
are you trying to skip being charged if you're not storing data? looking at the pricing table, you'll still get charged the $4.995 for the 0-100MB database size range.

Tables are deleted but database size does not change in sql server 2008r2

Hi All,
20GB Tables are deleted in my database but database size does not change and disk size showing same size.

Hi ,
I have ran the Disk usage by Top Tables report and Identified couple of tables with unwanted data for last 5 years. I have deleted the data for the first 3 years and then ran the Disk usage by Top Tables report again. When I compared the report before
and after the data deletion, I have noticed certain facts which is not matching with what I know or learned from experts like you. The following are the points where I am looking for clarification:
1.Reserved (KB) has been reduced. I was expecting the data Reserved (KB) will remain the same after the data deletion.
2. The Data(KB) and Indexes(KB) fields have been reduced as expected. The Unused(KB) field have been increased as expected.
I was expecting the total of Data(KB) and Indexes(KB) field space gained will be equal to the Unused(KB) field gained after deleting the data. But that is not the case. When I deducted(subtracted) the difference in the Reserved(KB)(Difference before
and after data deletion) field from the Total of space gained from the data deletion is equal to the Unused(KB) gained field value.
I am not a SQL expert and not questioning but trying to understand whether we really gain space by deleting data from the tables. Also keen to get the concepts right, but my testing by deleting some records confused me.
Looking ahead to all your expert advice.
Thanks,
Vennayat

What is the best practice on mailbox database size in exchange 2013

Hi,
does anybody have any links to good sites that gives some pros/cons when it comes to the mailbox database sizes in exchange 2013? I've tried to google it - but hasn't found any good answers. I would like to know if I really need more than 5 mailbox databases
or not on my exchange environment.

Hi
As far as I know, 2TB is recommended maximum database size for Exchange 2013 databases.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here
Terence Yu
TechNet Community Support

How to get the database size of several system

Hi
We've got a lot of database system on our landscape. I want to make a simple report to get the size the all our database on a weekly base.
I try to get a RZ20 value on it without succes.
Do you know a sql request that i could launch on all my database to get this information ? i did'nt find any V$^view with this information.
thanks for your help
florent

"The database size" can be
- the total size
- the filled size
- the filled size without undo/temp
You can use DBACOCKPIT to centrally manage multiple instance and check the sizes.
Markus

How to determine the database size corresponding to the nber records in DSO

Hi Colleagues,
I would like to determine the database size corresponding to my new BI project.
I know the number of records uploaded in the DSO from the source system for the intialization phase.
How can I deduct the database size / disk size corresponding to the number of record uploaded ?
Thanks,

Hi Ram,
I am with SAP BI Release SAPKW70019
I do not have the option Single Table analysis -
I have in DB02 or ST04 the following options.
*- Space*
-- space overview
->database
--overview
->users
--overview
--detailed analysis
-> tablespaces
--overview
--detailed analysis
-> segments
--overview
--Detailed analysis
--Detailed Analysis Aggregated
-> Additional Functions
--Collector Logs
--BW Analysis
Where should I go through ?
Thanks

Best Trategy to reduce the Database Size

Hi Everyone,
In our Client's Landscape SAP systems have been upgraded to newer versions whereas our client want
one copy of older Production systems (one copy to retain)
1) SAP R/3 4.6 C system (database size of this system is approx 2TB)
2) SAP BW 3.0 (database size of this system is approx 2TB)
Now CLient wants us to reduce the database size via re-organization because Archiving of IDOCs & Links we have already done
Client has recommended for :
1) Oracle Export/Import: Only Oracle DBA can do (ignore this one)
2) Database Reorganization : We have tried Reoragnization via BRtools but found very tedious 9 (ignore this one)
3) SAP Export/Import : Via this way we want to reduce the database size
Can anybody Tell us How much Free space do we require in order at OS level in order to store the Database Export
of Two Databases of size around 4TB & what would be the best strategy of reducing the Dabase size.
Via SAP Export/Import how much approx how much database size will be reduced
Thanks & Regards
Deepak Gosain

Hi,
>Can anybody Tell us How much Free space do we require in order at OS level in order to store the Database Export
>of Two Databases of size around 4TB & what would be the best strategy of reducing the Dabase size.
The only realistic way to know is to do a system copy of the production system on a testbed system and to test the Database Export.
If you really want to decrease the database size you will have to archive a lot more than the IDOC archiving object.
Regards,
Olivier

Best practice on mailbox database size & we need how many server for deployment exchange server 2013

Dear all,
We have an server that runs Microsoft exchange server 2007 with the following specification:
4 servers: Hub&CAS1 & Hub&CAS2 & Mailbox1 & Mailbox2
Operating System : Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64
6 mailbox databases
1500 Mailboxes
We need to upgrade our exchange server from 2007 to 2013 to fulfill the following requirment:
I want to upgrade the exchange server 2007 to exchange server 2013 and implement the following details:
1500 mailboxes
10GB or 15GB mailbox quota for each user
How many
servers and databases are
required for this migration<ins cite="mailto:Mohammad%20Ashouri" datetime="2014-05-18T22:41"></ins>?
Number of the servers:
Number of the databases:
Size of each database:
Many thanks.

You will also need to check server role requirement in exchange 2013. Please go through this link to calculate the server role requirement : http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/05/14/released-exchange-2013-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx
2TB is recommended maximum database size for Exchange 2013 databases.
Here is the complete checklist to upgrade from exchange 2007 to 2013 : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff805032%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx
Meanwhile, to reduce the risks and time consumed during the completion of migration process, you can have a look at this proficient application(http://www.exchangemigrationtool.com/) that would also be
a good approach for 1500 users. It will help you to ensure the data security during the migration between exchange 2007 and 2013.

One of the BizTalk Server processes in the affected computer is being throttled for significant periods because of high database size exceeding the threshold

Hello Experts,
I have complex Biz Talk 2013 farm having 20 servers,15 Hosts. In my production environment even if there is no traffic i am getting throttling errors from SCOM for my all the production hosts.
Error : One of the BizTalk Server processes in the affected computer is being throttled for significant
periods because of high database size exceeding the threshold
I checked following things:
1. MsgBoxDB size 748732 KB
2. Spool table size 53 MB
3. Tracking DB size 26724 KB
4. Host settings -- Message Queue Size = 100, MsgCount = 50000 , Spool MP = 10 , Tracking MP = 10
5. Ran Message Box viewer and did not found any error related to DB size. (which counter i should focus on in MBV)
Note -- for DB i am sharing full backup size because it does not have log file size.
Please suggest where i should focus?
Is SCOM reporting correctly because everything is fine in biztalk ?
Thanks
Yagya
https://www.mcpvirtualbusinesscard.com/VBCServer/card.aspx?tag=YagyaDattMishra&wa=wsignin1.0

Hi Yagyam
I remember this error from SCOM when you use the standard SCOM BizTalk pack.
Check the eventlog of the server, do you see any errors in event log, this could give some clue to the root cause. Whenever you have this alert from SCOM, you must have
some entries in eventlog relating to the alert raised by SCOM.
Is your message processing by BizTalk hosts are normal? Run the performance monitor to see the bottleneck. Check if there is really throttling.
As mentioned in this blog, check the state of the SQL Agent on BizTalk's SQL database server, may be try restart the SQL Agent on BizTalk's SQL database server.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/timdel/archive/2008/11/19/why-i-love-scom.aspx
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

How to increase the database size

Hi All ,
Our Client is going to increase their customers from 3.5 million to 5 millions
(12 millions in future ) and there is no increase in the existing licenses..
At present we have very less space in Data base server. We are Going Live at the End of the Month.
How to increase the database size to meet the Client requirements.
we have to increase the No of Processerors etc...
Below are the details of Servers:
System Model: IBM,7040-681
Machine Serial Number: 830D5BF
Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER4
Number Of Processors: 2
Processor Clock Speed: 1904 MHz
CPU Type: 64-bit
Kernel Type: 64-bit
LPAR Info: 4 bgl-svr-biap
Memory Size: 4096 MB
Good Memory Size: 4096 MB
Note : Server is IBM P690.
1) System Lansdcape --> Two System Landsacpe ( Dev to Prod )
2) BW Version --> 3.5
3) SAP Basis --- > 6.4
4) No of Application servers currently having --> Only One Server
Can any body suggest me how to solve this.....
Thanks in Advance..
Kasi Chukka

Hi Kasi,
Your question is not very clear, from the looks of it, the load on your client's system will be doubling soon.
You need to look at the system stats on how the system is handling the current load, use transactions ST06, ST04 and ST02 to check if the DB hit ratios are as expected, the cpu idle time, the busy periods. Identify if there is large amounts of paging on the server(candidate for increase in real memory).
On AIX level, you will need to look at CPU / Memory usage.
On SAP Application server, you need to look at SAP Buffers.
On Oracle end, look at SGA stats, if it need to increase, the data growth that is current and estimated growth (DB02).
You will not get an exact answer to it, you will need to analyze the existing load and then estimate (guess). The hardware upgrade will also depend on what the client is willing to spend, its always a good practise to add 20% to what you have estimated as these figures are never accurate.
All the best.
Cheers,
Nisch

How to know the database size

can one tell how to find the database size?

Depends what you mean by database size and how you want the output to look?
Are you referring to the number of rows across all tables of a schema? The number of bytes used by the rows? The number of bytes used by the tablespaces? The number of bytes used by the datafiles? etc. etc. etc. So many options.
Be more clear in your requirements please.

Control wss_loggin database size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for