Cost component report

this is the z report we are using for cost component report .when run the report for perticular movement type system taking the total value of the one movement type .But when you give two movement type (ex :601 and 602 ) the ststem giving only one moment type total amount not both movement type total .what is the reason for this case .can u please provide the solution for this .i hope i will get the suitable solution for this case
EX : with movement type 601 cost report total is 5000 .but when run with two movement types (601 and 602 ) the system picking the cost report total is 5000 only that is only movement type 601 total .System does not picking the both movment type totals .what is the reason please hope suitable answer from your end .Thank you...........
601 - goods delivery
602 -goods delivery reverse
Regards
Raj

not answered

Similar Messages

Auxiliary Cost Component- report

Dear Experts,
Is there any report available (similar to S_P99_41000111) that show cost component structure based on Auxiliary Cost Component?
Thanks
babu

Dear Babu Bhai
In CK13N when you see the cost details at that point when you click Cost component button as highlighted below screen1 you get a button for CCS as highlighted as screen2 which gives you opportunity to see Aux CCS.
Screen1
Screen 2
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena

Cost component with quantity

Hi SAP Experts
My client want material actual cost component report not only with value amount, but also with quantity.
The material ledger was activated, I know using standard function, we can have material actual cost component report with value amount, like Tcode:MLCCSPD, but cannot find any quantity information.
Do anyone have the kind of requirement and how to achieve it ?
If only customer development method, how to do it. thanks a lot!

I tested the CKMLQS, it only get the current period BOM quantity, cannot trace to origin component quantity.
for example:
Previous Period: material A Qty 10 -----produce------> material B Qty 10
Current Period : material B Qty 7 -----produce-------> material C Qty 7
Now, Using report:CKMLQS, it only show material B quantity 7 consumed for material C, cannot see the origin component material A consumed quantity.
I need to trace origin component(the lowest level of BOM) quantity, like amount value report(Tcode:MLCCSPD).
Anyone have suggestions? thanks
Regards
Robin

Change Analyze cost component split CK80_99 or CK13N.

HI experts,
How or where can i change report CK80_99 or CK13N? I don´t know which is it report? I need some summarization row to this report, for example:
Cost component split:
10 raw material
20 wraps
10-20 material in sum - Summarization
30 wages
40 overhead
10-40 production costs - sumarization
Thanks a lot, for Your help.
Gustavo

Hi,
CK13N transaction allows you to see information of standard costs in below formts.
1.Cost itemisation-cost of each item which is responsible for standard cost and summation of all elements in last row.
2.Cost component-these are configured cost sets based on local cost reporting method.
3.Costing level with cost component-This replica of your BOM structure with additional information cost for each level.
Your issue is realated with #2 in the above list.
I hope following steps will help you to get that information,
In CK13 transaction call the cost component report.Download this report into excel format and sum up as per your requirement.
or else if you want configure existing cost components under expected groups in cost component config.
Hope this helps you.
Ashok

Standard Report for Materials Cost Component Structure - PO Condition Type

Dear experts,
We are using below cost component structure (CCS) for materials:
- Direct materials
- import duty
- import handling
In which, all those above CCS are achieved through below condition type in Purchasing Info Record. When doing the standard cost estimate through costing run, we have successfully grouped all those condition types into their respective CCS. The problem is, while executing the standard report of "result of costing run" (S_ALR_87099930), the sytem groups all those three CCS into CCS "Direct materials" only.
I have tried different standard layouts, but still got no way to show all those CCS separately in the standard report.
Please kindly suggest what approach should i take
Thank you very much
BR, Erwin
@edit
Solved.
Edited by: Erwin Hartono on Nov 16, 2011 9:16 AM

Hi
Check cost elements assigned to structure. For this go to transaction code OKTZ and select your CCS and double click on Assignment Cost Component-Cost element interval.
Srinivas

Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

Hello Gurus,
Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
Thanks
RG

Hi Raghu,
After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
You will be able to get the comparison...
Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
Srikanth Munnaluri

Cost component structure in CO-OM Reporting

Hi there,
we want to run cost center reports, that show us the balance on a cost center per primary cost element, after we have allocated some of the costs from the cost center into production orders.
I thought this can be achieved by having the tariffs we use for the internal activity allocation been broken into their cost component structure so that on the cost center, the respective primary cost elements are debited by the activity allocation.
However, this is not happening in my system. While the activity tariffs are correctly calculated with a component split (according the 1SKS-001 report), the standard cost center report still shows the debit on the cost center with the secondary cost element of the activity.
Does this mean I cannot see the component split of my activities in normal OM reporting?
Thanks
Kai

Hi
Make cost splitting structure and assigne to Production Cost Center.
Run Cost splitting KSS2 for cost splitting according to activity types.
bukhari

Cost component structure in copa report

HI Gurus
1We are doing REM Process and costing variant "PREM"
2. We are going for moving average price for all Material type there is no standard cost estimate
3. My client want to see the cost component structure in copa reports like
sales
exice
ram material
packing material
labour
overehad
selling and distributioh overhead
I have done all necessary setting in costing key
I have done pa trasnfer structre also
But Cost component spill is not happening in copa report
Can we get cost component struture in copa report with moving average price if yes
Please advice me how to geneate the report
Thanks & Regards
KISHORE

Hi Aravind
Thanks for your reply, But in our business process there is not Standard cost estimation,bcoz, Price control in material master is MAP. Can we get cost component strudcture in copa if we are going for MAP in MM.
I have done all the Setting IN KE4R also. But i am unable to see the values in COPA report
Thanks
KISHORE

How to get Cost element for a component in co03 cost analysis report

Hi,
I'm using table COSP to find the quantity for a production order component. However, I need to identify the cost element first to get the unique data. In CO03 cost analysis report, there is cost element for the component. Does anyone know how to get it ?
Thanks.

CSKA stores the basic info about the cost element
There is no data in CSKB.
I'm trying to use different tables to get the cost element.
AUFK, AFKO, AFPO, RESB, ...but no luck...

Report for cost component wise standard cost

Dear All,
I can view cost component structure wise breakup of cost for materials through various options in controlling.
But, I can view that only material wise, I am unable to find any report which can allow me to view cost component structure wise breakup for say 1000 odd materials at one go.
Kindly let me know if there is any report which allows me to view cost component structure wise breakup for mutilple materials.
Regards
SM

Hi
Refer S_P99_41000111 ... If that helps.. It does not provide cost componnets
Most of companies develop their own report using tables KEKO, KEPH, MARC, MBEW,etc.. there is no Std report in SAP which can give you Cost Comp Wise view for multiple materials due to technical limitations
refer Note 149261 - Problems with customer reports tables KKBC, KKBE. ..., which confirms the same point
br, Ajay M

COPA Gross Margin report Cost component roll up

Hi,
I have a question about COPA valuation using standard cost estimate and roll up of cost components in Gross Margin report.
I would like to build a simple Gross Margin Report in KE30 showing Billed quantity, Revenues and COGS split to Material, Labour and Overhead Components, but with cost components roll-up from SGH to FG.
In order to have the split of COGS I believe I need to maintain Valuation using Standard cost estimate in COPA. However, from my experience, I think that in Gross Margin reports I saw in COPA in the past - there was no cost component rollup from Semi finished to Finished products.
I mean if we sold 1 piece of FG at a price of 20 EUR and cost components for it would split into:10 - Materials, 2 - Labor,3 - Overhead (Total COGS of 15 EUR)
If this is 2-level production and this FG has SFG in its cost estimate, the SFG cost split into: 3 - Materials, 1 -Labor and 2 - Overhead
From my experience all costs of SFG used to produce that FG would go under Materials Component in Gross Margin report (312=5 from SFG would go to Material component of Sold Finished Product). Is it possible to have in Gross Margin report situation where Material Component from SFG would be rolled up to Material component in Sold Finished Product, Labor component from SFG rolled up to Labour component in FG... etc?
Regards,
Karol

Hi Karol
I dont think that SAP functions this way... In your eg, the Cost of SFG (321) does not roll upto to the Material cost of FG
Moreover, it is not controlled in COPA, but in Product Costing
When you define your Cost Comp Str in OKTZ, you can tick the check box "Roll up Cost Component" in each of the cost components.... Once you do this, the Overhead cost in SFG will be rolled up to the Overhead cost of FG (And Not to Material Cost of FG)...
Costing keys would simply fetch the cost estimates and transfer it to COPA.... So, set it up right at the source in OKTZ and it should be done
br, Ajay M

Product cost component

Hello all,
I am trying to create a report painter report which dsiplays all the cost components on the columns and materials along the rows. I have chosen structure KKBE library 7EE to accomplisg the task. However I cannot come up witht the report I want to.
I have started doubting if the table and library even provides with the capability to achieve a report of such nature.
Please advice me whether the library and structure that I am using is right? if not what is the best structure that can be used??
What kind of reports can I make using structure KKBE?
I have been suggested that ABAP report is the best option that we have. Can you please confirm that for me?
I want to know what reason should I put before the management to effectively convince them that report Painter dosen't possess the capability and that ABAP needs to be used? (If that is truely the case)
Points will be duely assigned for all helpfull answers.
Thanks,
NIK

I tried defining the report however this is the error message I get when I try and execute the report.
Can someone please advise on how to fix this probs. Above all, please explain in plain english what the message is all about.
"Report contains more than one report object"
Message no. KN089
Diagnosis
The report is for more than one report object. This causes performance problems. This is not supportedc in product costing in particular.
Can't really understand what that means?
Also can you tell me what characteristics do I need to pull to define the column for cost component lets say "Direct Depreciation". If you can tell me for 1 cost comp I can emulate the info to define the rest of the columns for diff cost comp.
thanks
NIK

Primary cost component split not happening

Hello Experts,
I am trying to create a Primary cost component split for Products with following settings
1. Creation of Primary cost component structure "1N" and marking it as Primary cost component
2. Assigning the Primary cost elements to the Cost component structure
3. Assigning the Primary cost component structure for the Company code and Plant
4. Assigning the Primary cost component structure to "Version" under "Price calculation" tab.
5. Activity type with Activity type category "1- Manual entry, Manual allocation" and Price Indicator "1 - Plan price, automatically based on activity"
6. Activity output planning for Cost center
7. Primary cost planning for the Cost centers
8. Activity price calculation. (Update run) - Prices are changed in KP26 also
9. After all the above steps I checked report S_ALR_87013644, Plan price is existing in the report as mentioned in SAP note: 1658589
After all the above steps, I tried running Cost estimate for a product. I am getting the error message
Cost element 90001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Also, I am getting a message
No structure could be determined for internal activity TEB (M0001)
Message no. CK694
Therefore the Cost component is showing only the Material component.
Where "90001" is a secondary cost element. I am not sure why system is still searching for Secondary cost element where we have assigned Primary cost component structure. I also ensured that Primary cost elements used in planning are all assigned to a Component in Cost component structure.
I checked for SAP note "1736332", which is not applicable for my system version. Current version of SAP_APPL is Release 606 and Support package SAPKH60607.
Please help. Am I missing any settings.
Thank you in advance.
Muneer Ahamed N

Hi Muneer,
Please check whether you have maintained cost center splitting structure properly and assigned to the respective cost center for which you have maintained output planning and input planning.
This splitting structure is much required because there only we maintain the relationship between primary cost elements and activities.
Coming to your first message, yes system expects maintenance of secondary cost elements also in the cost component structure which is not primary CCS.
Inorder to show primary cost component structure view:
First, system calculates the direct activity cost in terms of secondary cost elements...
Next, it verifies the cost center splitting structure you made,
Then, system is going to convert the direct activity cost in terms of primary cost elements based on the splitting structure and Finally displays the primary cost component view
I suppose second message speaking about cost center splitting structure only, please go through it carefully
Other than these whatever the process you specified is right only..
Regards...
Jose

Itemization does not match cost component split

Hi,
I need your help or could you please shed some light as to how to fix .
A new Overhead was created, in order to add expenses to the pricing of the product. For it a variant of different pricing to which is used currently was created, and so for maintain a historic one of the information.
In addition, in the cost component Structure an adjustment of the configuration was carried out, this was done because the previous the cost component Structure contained 18 elements of costs, which the most of the elements were specified as fixed and variable costs, therefore the system only permitted the addition of 2 more elements (SAP only permits 20 elements of fixed and variable costs), nevertheless was necessary to create a total of 23 elements of costs. For it the previous elements have to be modified and to change some elements as variable costs, specifically the elements corresponding to the accounts of materials. using tcode OKTZ
The addition of 5 more elements of costs, corresponding to overhead elements, where the type 41 costs classes were configured from the plan of surcharge created.
After carrying out the changes and to transport them the client of production, when i execute the T-code ck13n an inconsistency in the previous pricings was generated, because the cost component Structure was modified and the the following one Nº message was showed: CK869 " Mat.XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split, the report of itemization shows different values to the reports of Costed Mutilevel BOM and of Cost Components. Additionally to the error shown by the system, also is observed that to the Cost Components report a cost in the new elements of overhead was added, even when the calculation of previous cost did not contain the determination of overhead.
In order to fix the error, I modified the cost component structure as it was before and the created another cost component structure with the required changes requested by the client specifying that it should start to be current this year. However after that change the error message nºCK869 continue: Mat. XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split. Adding to that error message, the cost of the finished product changes with reference to the calculus of the previous product after modified the configuration and that is because the cost of the semifinished product is not being taken the values of the row material, and it is appearing with cost 0 and the only value that is taking on the matter are the costs of the activities types.

If you want the message to go away then you need to mark and releasse the estimate. However, there is no requirement that you do this. The message you are getting is an informational message only. You can continue without re-costing the item. If you do re-cost the material the new cost estimate will reflect and changes you've made to the components, so there is a good chance you will get a different value with the new estimate. So if that's ok, go ahead and mark and release the new estimate.

Cost component split datasource

Hi,
We recently activated 0CO_PC_ACT_10 Cost Component Split datasource and bringing info into 0COPC_C07 cube for the costing analysis.
Acccording to the requirement need to extact the cost of finished material and cost of semi finished material into BW. The relevent costs are avaialble in R/3 in T code CKM3N. The finished and semi finished materials are differenciated in R/3 with Prefix C. ex: If material is 10000 then semi finished material will be C10000.
We modelling as per SAP standard and loaded, we are able to load cost of finished material with sales order but not able to load cost of semi finished material with sales order. (need to analyse cost of semi finished material with sales order in reporting)
Any inputs on how to bring cost of semi finished material with sales order in BW cubes. Also we are thinking to write new extractor as this standard extractor is not meeting our requirement.
I would like to know is anybody got similar requirement, or is anybody involved in enhancing this datasource for getting sales order with semi finished materials?
Please let me know your thoughts. If you need any more info from my side let me know.
Thanks
Naveen

Hi Rakesh ,
The datasource 0CO_PC_ACT_10 uses the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA to extract its data .
And in the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA,
i could locate these tables - ckmlhd and ckmlmv011 .
So you can check these tables for your information .
You can also have a look at this :
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/a2e338d96cd84fe10000000a11405a/frameset.htm]
Thanks ,
Lokesh

Cost component report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for