Cost element not display in grr3

Dear Experts,
I have a new cost element assigned in cost elemnt group zzz in KAH2
While running GRR3 the new cost element I have assigned did not display there.
Characteristic value for our report in Grr3 is taken from cost element group zzz.
Please advice
Thank you in advance

Also check account group KDH2
Sam

Similar Messages

Cost details not displaying in MCI3 for particular Month.

Hi,
In MCI3 report cost details are not displaying for particular month, for example Jan'09 to Jul'09 is appearing but Aug'09 is not appearing but Sep and Oct'09 is cost appearing in MCI3.
Let me know if Costing variant configuration are changed in the month October (and revoked late october) means it will not appear? Or what is the root cause for not appearing in particular month.
Regards
Kishore

Hello,
could you clarify if planned costs or actual costs are not displayed for August 09 ?? Or both ??

Product costing - cost elements not to be created

Hi
Can any one suggest on the list of G/L accounts for which cost elements not be created in CO in terms of product costing?
thanks
Moderator: Please, search before posting

hi,
Cost elements need to be created for those you want assign in your cost component structure.
Secondary cost elements for over heads material, Production with category - 41,
Cost elements for WIP calculation (All costs, Material costs)- 31 category
Cost elements for RA.
Primary cost elements are some how need to be created for the P/L accounts.
secondary cost elements are which are used inturn used for production process like over heads etc.
Why you are worried about GLs & cost elements not to be created.
Which are require you create them.
Edited by: santosh kumar on Feb 6, 2012 4:47 AM

TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

Hi PS Expets,
I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
But this also eliminate the display of the cost from the internal order.
Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
Kind regards,
Anne

Hello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid

Cost Elements not to br created

Hi Gurus,
Which Cost Elements should not created againts the GL accounts apart from Assets & Laibilties' GL.
Like WIP change A/c should not created as Cost Elements.
regards
Shiv.

Hi,
There are different kind of Cost Elements which depends upon the Cost Element Category...
01: Primary costs / cost-reducing revenues
This cost element category can be debited for all primary postings, for example, in Financial Accounting (FI) or in Materials Management (MM).
Cost-reducing revenues are revenues that are to be handled in CO similarly to overhead costs, and which reduce the prices of an activity type or the costs to be assessed. This is the case, for example, with rent revenues, which reduce the room costs to be assessed. Cash discount amounts and exchange rate amounts are also cost-reducing revenues.
03: Accrual Calculation Using the Percentage Method
You can only use this cost element category during accrual calculation in Cost Center Accounting (component CO-OM-CCA) when you are using the percentage method. You can post directly from FI to take account of the actual costs incurred. The system also uses cost elements of this category to post the accrual amounts within Cost Center Accounting CO-OM-CCA.
If you do take actual costs into account (say, for additional costs), create cost elements of this category in Controlling (CO) only. The account must be defined in the chart of accounts, but you do not need to create the general ledger account in FI.
04: Accrual Calculation Using the Target=Actual Method
Used in Cost Center Accounting (CO-OM-CCA) only for accrual calculation when you are using the target=actual method. You can post costs directly from FI to register actual costs incurred. At the same time, the system uses this category of cost element to post accrual cost amounts within Cost Center Accounting CO-OM-CCA.
If you do take actual costs into account (say, for additional costs), create cost elements of this category in Controlling (CO) only. The account must be defined in the chart of accounts, but you do not need to create the general ledger account in FI.
11: Revenues
Used to post revenues. These revenues are generally posted during make-to-stock-production directly into the operating profit, or with make-to-order-production to the sales order.
In Controlling (CO) revenues are displayed with negative +/- sign. An exception to this is Profitability Accounting (CO-PA, costing-based), in which all values, including revenues, are displayed with a positive +/- sign.
12: Sales Deductions
Used to post deductible items (sales adjustments, sales corrections) such as discounts and rebates. Certain deductible items (freight charged separately in the invoice, surcharges for small quantities, special orders) are not classified as sales deductions, but as revenue elements.
You can use this category in the same manner as revenue elements (category 11). Values on cost centers are displayed as statistical only.
22: External Settlement
Used to settle order costs, project costs, or cost object costs to objects outside of CO. These objects could be assets (Asset Management), materials (Materials Management), or general ledger accounts (Financial Accounting). The R/3 System creates an accounting document when the costs are settled.
Cost elements of this category cannot be used for settlement within CO (cost centers, orders, projects, and so on). Use secondary cost element category 21 for this purpose. The system does not create an accounting document when costs are settled within CO.
U can also create the cost element for Balance Sheet Account for below mentioned purpose
90: Cost Elements for Balance Sheet Accounts in FI
Automatically assigned when you create cost elements in CO whose general ledger accounts in FI are asset reconciliation accounts (special balance sheet accounts), not income statement accounts. You cannot change this category in CO master data maintenance.
FI does not require CO account assignments to cost elements of category 90. However, if you enter an account assignment, it is only recorded statistically for true objects.
Category 90 cost elements enable you to check the budget of an order or project when you acquire fixed assets that can be directly capitalized. To do this, enter the capital investment order or the WBS element in the corresponding field of the asset master data. Asset Management (AM) ensures that the specified order or WBS element is automatically entered in the document during the asset acquisition.
In CO the order or WBS element is debited statistically. This statistical debiting is checked by the system using the budget during availability control.
Hope you Understood....
Reward Points to Help You Better
Regards,
Jigar

Cost elements not appearing in report

Hi,
We have reports done in report painter. we use cost element group to retrieve the amounts posted to that group.
I added 2 more accounts to the cost element group and saved.
but it is not appearing when I run the reports which shows cost element wise amounst for teh period.
rgds
Neha

Hi sanjay,
thanks.
But GR53 gives me Library and report group.
when i go to GRR2, gives the library I see in GR53, and search report group in list of values ,
I am not able to see the report group as above.
When I manually type in it says
Report Y511 does not exist
Message no. KH 502
Diagnosis
You tried to change a row/column structure which does not exist.
Procedure
Choose an existing row/column structure or creating a new one using
    'Row/column structure' -> 'Create'.
Pl advice.
thanks
neha

Exempted cost element not working for budget availability control

Hi,
I have configure the exempted cost element in our sandbox client. In the SAP IMG menu Project System -> Costs ->Budget-> Specify exempted cost element I maintain the following entry.
COAr cost element Origin Group
0200 433010 *
Then in the material master of a material I maintain the origin group in costing 1 view as 001. Then I do a material issue against the network of a WBS in MB1A tr code mvt type 281 and post the cost to the cost element 433010. As per the exempted cost element logic this should not affect the budget availability since the cost element 433010 is define as an exempted cost element. But the system shows actual incurrence for this transaction and reduce that must amount from the budget. I check this is the S_ALR_87013558 report. To re-ensure I do the Project Info database rebuilt in CJEN tr code then activate the availability control in CJBN but this is of no use. The S_ALR_87013558 still shows the budget available as total budget minus the cost incurred in the cost element 433010 in the above transaction.
Please let me know if anybody has configured the exempted cost element in their client and have resolve this issue.
Thanks and regards'
Preetam

Hi,
This is a std SAP Functionality and system should exempt the costs for the cost element maintained in the Configuration for that Controlling Area.
Muzamil

Cost Elements not to be created

< MODERATOR: Message locked. Please post this message in the [Controlling forum|SAP ERP Financials - Controlling;. >
Hi All,
Can you please let us know, which type of P&L accounts should not be created as Cost Elements in Controlling . . .
We have list of such accounts which are not to be created as Cost Elements. Pl let us if the list is correct or not.
Cost Elements should not be created for the following.
1 Change in work in process WIP
2. Cost element for cost of goods sold transactions. (P&L Accounts maintained in OBYC > GBB > General Modification VAX)
3. Production order variances. (P&L Accounts maintained in OBYC > PRD > General Modification PRF)
4. Do not create any cost elements for financial and tax expenses if you want your CO-PA structure to stop at earnings before interest and taxes
5. Price Difference account should not be made as cost element.
Please explain for situation where COPA is implemented and where COPA is not implemented . . .
Any guidence in this regard will be of grate help . . .
Regards,
Ravi Kumar

Hi,
Your list is not viable.
See, cost element only can be made for P&L item.
U can't make cost element for B/S item.
For P/L item also , u need to understand company's policy and requirement.
In your list
change in WIP is a B/s item so it is not a cost element item.
O ther Gl like cost of goods sold , generaly no company follow this GL as such head is a part of costing sheet reporting .
U need to asssigne GL which is related with that head in costing sheet.
Any way your gl like price difference, Prod order diff etc must have cost element . other wise U will get fake report on Controling.
Regards,
Pari

Cost elements not being recognized in results analysis

Hi,
I have set up the RA update correctly as shown in this screen shot http://wikisend.com/download/465092/ra_log.JPG however i am not sure why the system still says it cannot find the cost elements assignment. I ran kka1 with full log to see what config parameters the system is considering and what are the cost elements which are still not mapped. The screen shot above is the result of kka1 execution.
If you cannot view the screen shot please see the following of the same KKA1 results :-
Parameters for assignmt
CostElem   Orig CostCtr    ActTyp BusProcess   D V AR AI ValidFrm RC RC%    OC OC%    CBC CBC%
2150912    ++++                                + +    ++ 001.1997 SET 100.00      0.00       0.00
2110111    ++++                                + +    ++ 001.1997 COP 100.00      0.00       0.00
Char. w/o assignment
CostElem   Orig CostCtr    ActTyp BusProcess   D V AR AI VFrom    ValidTo
2110111    COIL                                D V       006.2012 006.2012
2110111    WILO                                D V       006.2012 006.2012
2150912    FG00                                S F       006.2012 006.2012
2150912    FG00                                S V       006.2012 006.2012

Hi
Please go through the below mentioned link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c5/b56fa582700b488dda002bb136deff/content.htm
Hope it may help you
Regards
Praveen P C

Activity types cost Elements not reflecting in Cost Centre Report.

Hello SAP Gurus,,
1. Here we are facing one issue in Zreport. total is not matching, compare with KSB1.
Values are more in Zreport, in other words activity type cost elements are not reflecting in Zreport, but it reflecting in KSB1.
example: flow from PM module.
Actually we had used logic based on the Cost Centres, in that cost centre by taking Object number and it passes to COEP table, then we are getting values as same as KSB1.
As per investigation i found that the object number is differ from COEP table and CSKS table.
Exapmple : 1410000 object number in CSKS table, 1410000EL in COEP table, thats why in Zreport these values are not reflecting.Finally our requirment is , Zreport values should same as KSB1 vlaues.
2. We need same functionality as same as KSB1 for match code or drop down menu functionality for Cost Centre Group and Cost Element Group, but while user wants select from match code or drop menu (F4), as of now i didnt given any logic to abap for match code functionality or drop down menu (F4),so in this case which logic or table i have to use.
So please give me inputs or logic how to over come the above points.
Regards,
Raj.

The OBJNR field structure is as follows :-
AABBBBCCCCCCCCCCDDDDDD
AA = object type eg. KS (cost center)
BBBB = controlling area
CCCCCCCCCC = cost center
DDDDDD = activity type
Based on the structure, you will be able to filter the relevant cost center/activity types. You can also use other fields eg. cost element, partner object, source object, value type, etc. to get your desired figures as per KSB1.

Cost elements not included in Cost Component

We are getting an error which I do not get any clue.
In the costing run message is coming that Cost elements 670001 & 400098 not assigned to a cost component. However, when I checked the cost component structure, both these cost elements are included there. Then why the system is saying that they are not included in the cost component ?

Hi,
In the Costing data tab of the cost estimation screen you have Costing variant.
Click on the costing variant, then in the Assignment tab you have cost component structure filed click it and check which is being used.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi

AFAB asking for new cost elements not used before.

AFAB returns error indicating a range of cost elements that was not existing in the previous system and in the new system (ECC6) as well.
I like to know why this error when it is not being used and how to rectify to allow AFAB.

Hi,
Cost elements does not exsist so there is no question of validity in master data.
It is asking to create cost elements. So, i want to know why the system is asking or from where it is picking up?
We have not used this cost elements before.

Cost element not assigned to any line id

when i excute the transction kkax i am getting cost element is not assigned to any id
would you please explin the wip configuration steps.
i am not aware the masked cost element
with regards
Srinivas

You need to read the error to find out which cost element needs assignment.
You need to assign the source cost elements (through t-code OKGB), that are expected in the production order to various line ID already created. You maintain this data for CO area, RA version and RA key combination. You use masking when you mention which cost element to be assigned to various IDs. You can also direct various cost element, if it comes with a combination of particular cost center and activity type to a particular Line ID. If you need to keep it simple, just enter +++++++++ for cost centers, activity types and Business processes. Cost elements can be masked as follows; for eg. All cost primray cost elements for materials, if they start from 210001 to 219999, the you can mask them like 00021+++++. Give the line ID in the column Required to Capitailze.
Your line IDs typically would reflect the cost component structure.

Overhead Cost Element not update

Hi,
I have created Cost sheet , assigned to Production plant, for FG Material,
Overhear updated when run SCE, and production order also updated but after settlement secondary GL a/c with Credit cost center not update. in system show no value in particular overhead
Please help me
Thanks & regards.
Vinu.

Hi Ajay,
Yeah I have maintained inventory valuation (Fixed and variable costs)
overhead cost should be calculate, Fixed and variable cost so i have maintained (Fixed and variable costs)
in cost sheet i have maintained only plan rate not actual.is it ok ?.
Thanks & Regards.
Vinu,
Edited by: vinutha1010 on Oct 25, 2010 7:37 PM

The additive cost can not display on the work order plan cost

dear friends
first i run the ck74n for the additive cost ,second i run the ck11n for cost estimate ,i can see that the additive cost update to the standard cost successfully ,at last i run the ck24 mark and release the standard cost,but when i raise a work order ,i can not see the additive cost in the plan cost ,i do not know the reason ,do you have some suggestion
thanks

Hi
This behaviour is expected and standard...
In Std cost estimate, you have the option of inputting components manually in CK74N... But the actual costs in Prod order will come either from Material issues/Activity Confirmations or manual postings from FI... There is no option to enter additive costs in actuals.. Hence, there is no option of "additive costs" in the Planned costng variant of Prod order
If you enter any additive costs in CK11N, It is done because you cant estimate it through Qty Structure.. But, during actuals, the actual costs are all available through Material issues/Activity Confirmations.. hence, the additive costs does not apply here
BR,Ajay M

Cost element not display in grr3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for