TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

Hi PS Expets,
I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                      or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
But this also eliminate the display of the cost from the internal order.
Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
Kind regards,
Anne

Hello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid

Similar Messages

Can i allocate cost from Internal order to PA?

can i allocate cost from Internal order to PA?
if i can .
please tell me how to do.

Hello Friend,
OKO7 is the tcode to settlement profile - here you can choose segement for allowable settlement object.
KO88 is the tcode of settlement of internal order.
Thanks
ravi

Internal orders to WBS Element

Hi,
I,m working in a Project System implementation project, where all other modules are already in use.As per the existing process, Internal orders are created for asset accounting.Those are of statistical. All the purchase orders & costs are booked referring to the internal orders, the same cost is directly settled to Asset Under Construction or Asset.As the internal orders are created as statistical, there is no seperate settlement process & all the costs are directly settled either in AUC or in Asset as & when they are incurred(posted).
Now as we are implementing Project Systems, Internal orders are going to be replaced by WBS Elements. Customer requirement is the same process of online settlement of costs to Assets from WBS Element & he doen't want to settle seperately.
Now the issue is, 1) how the process can be mapped in SAP?
I feel creating the WBS elements as statistical, the same process can be mapped. Is it possible/
2) As one project is already in progress & some postings have been taken place against internal orders, customer wants to see all those postings on new WBS element, now how to migrate the same to respective WBS element in the new system?
Thanks
Kishore

Hi Kishore Ji,
For your question, simple answer is, you want to continue all AUC under Project Systems. So far, you have considered statistical internal orders, anyway, which is not possible for you to settle directly. So, please take that amount generate uploading document by using same account and using WBS element as debit and internal order as credit and status you release for internal orders.
WBS elements you create as statistical without selecting account assignment category.
Your problem will be solved.
Assign points without fail.
ALL THE BEST.

Copy partner function from sales order to WBS element

Hello
Does someone know if it is possible to copy the partner function and its assignment from the sales order to the WBS element?
In our project, we create sales order with article having a strategy group (85) view MRP3. Thanks to that a network and a WBS element is created in background based on template. In the template a partner determination procedure is maintained => partner tab in the WBS element is displayed (CJ20N) but the partners maintained in the sales order are not populated.
Is something missing in the customizing?
Is it possible to do it in standard?
Kind regards
Chris

Hello Tison.
I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
Best regards.
Jens Schmid

Settling of Cost for Production Order via WBS Element

Hi Gurus,
Just would like to briefly understand, how I can make use of the WBS Element in the Production Order (Assignment tab) to use as cost settling for a production order? How do i automate the WBS Element in the production Order for a set of given parameters? Is there a config I can use to set a profile?
I have a scenario here as below:
I have various types of production orders:
PO 1 = Production A
PO 2 = Production B
PO 3 = Production C
And for each of the above, I will individually have a WBS Element.
PO1 - WBS Element A
PO2 - WBS Element B
PO3 - WBS Element C
And WBS Element A, B and C is a Level 2 WBS Element which are tied to WBS Element Z (Level 1 WBS Element), which will be settled to a project.
Appreciate your kind feedback on the above on how I can make it work in the PP Order.
Thanks.
Rgds.

Hi Manoj,
I need to understand your process in more detail.
How do you procure? Create a sales order with TAS item category to create a PReq and PO?
Very simple explanation: Resource Related billing/DIP profiles are used to accumulate costs on WBS elements and then bill the client as needed.

Settlement from internal order to asset under construction

HI All,
I have allocated some labors hours cost from production cost centers to real order which is created for allocating the internal cost to asset under construction.
when i allocate the labor hours by using the "KB21N" it has used the secondary cost element that is "Internal activity allocation" cost element "1200002".
i have given the source cost element "1200002" which is created as "internal activity allocation" and in settlement cost elements folder i have given receiving category is "FXA" and selected by cost element check box. i selected required entry field in settlement profile and assigned in order type.
when i do the settlement to asset under construction from internal order it is showing bellow errow.
"Settlement by cost element not possible due to secondary cost element
Message no. KD553
Diagnosis
You want to settle the secondary cost element 1200002 by cost element to an asset or G/L account, which is not allowed.
Procedure
Extend your allocation structure R3, so that secondary cost elements are not settled by cost element, but with a settlement cost element."
please let me know the problem and where i did mistake. give me the solution
thanks in advance
Mr.Rao

HI,
in your allocation structure R3 you entered in the view "Settlement cost element" that settlement receiver categoy FXA receives values "by cost element". This is only possible for primary cost elements. For internal activities do not tick "by cost element" but use a settlement cost element with cost element category "22".
best regards, Christian

Production order variance settlement to cost centers/internal order

Hi,
I am looking to configure the settlement of production order variances to cost centers/internal order. Is there a way to do this in the settlement profile. Would appreciate your help.
Thank you,
Ram

OKO7 will allow you to configure the Settlement Profile by selecting valid receivers.
This should be done with/or by FICO.
Then test, test, test
award points if helpful
Althea

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Sales order - show total plan costs (from production order) on sales order

Hi all,
I have the following question/scenario:
We create prodction order to collect cost (hours) for a service. There exists also a material master for this service.
The confirmed hours are posted on the production order and then setteld to the respective sales order (settlement rule SDI).
What to I have to maintain/customize to show the total plan cost (for the service) on gthe sales order?
If I check the sales order via VA03 --> environment --> cost report , I can see the planned sales revenue but no planned costs?
(the actual value flows work so far, postings via settlement or billing document).
I hope the topic is understandable. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Butch66 on Sep 27, 2010 7:07 PM
Edited by: Butch66 on Sep 27, 2010 7:08 PM

Hi
Planned costs from prod order can not show on sale order.. Both are 2 separate entities in their own respects
Unless you calculate sales order cost estimate on your sales order, you cant see planned costs on sale order...
To calculate sale order cost estimate, make settings in your requirement class...
1. Go to procurement tab of sale order
2. See whats the requirement type
3. Go to IMG > Controlling > Prod cost Contr > Cost Obj Contr > Prod Cost by Sales Order > Control of Requirements
4. Here you can see mapping of req type to req class....
5. If you want to have sales order costing and have sales order as CO object inorder to have sales order wise profitability, you should have following settings in Req class...
>Acct Assignment Category should be E
>Costing: Either Blank or X
>Costing Id and Costing Method: As per your requirement
Regards
Ajay M

Settlment from Internal order to asset

Hi Guru!
I have some problem about integrate between Internal order (Investment funtion) and Asset
I have Internal order master and assign investment profile in master and in Internal order link to AUC automatic. End of period I input Asset no 100001 , 100002 in settlment rule by Transaction code KOB5 (line item settlement orders and then) and I settlment by t. code KO88. The result is expense from Internal order transfer to AUC only not transfer to Asset no. 100001 , 100002. after settlment in Asset module have transcation type 116 Acquisition - internal settlement to AuC only but not have 336,339 Acquirg transfer of curr-yr acquis from inv.meas. I need 336, 339 for transfer value from AUC to Fixed Asset . How I solve this problem?
thanks

Hi,
In OAXG, select the transaction type 336 & 339.
In this go to Other features
Remove the tick from the Checkbox Cannot be used manually. Try to excute the transaction.
Regards,
Amit

BAPI KPF6 POST PLAN COST FOR INTERNAL ORDER AND COST ELEMENT

Hi all gurus,
I would like to use in a custom report a BAPI/Function Module that help me to simulate KPF6 in order to post planning costs for internal order and cost element (layout 1-401).
So the input should be:
1) Version
2) period from
3) periodo to
4) year
5) internal order n.
6) cost element n.
7) value
I found a lot of BAPI but don't know the correct one and how to use it (example how to fill the input value).
Can anyone help me on that?
Kind Regards

In additio to the previous I found the BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTPRIMCOST but don't know if it's the correct one and how to use it (some example fitting the my case will be very appreciated).
If the quoted BAPI is correct.
I tested it filling all fields as following:
HEADERINFO:
CO_AREA=FFCA
FISC_YEAR=2008
PERIOD_FROM=001
PERIOD_TO=012
DOC_HDR_TX='blank'
INDEXSTRUCTURE:
OBJECT_INDEX=000001
VALUE_INDEX=000004 (hope this point at Interna Order)
ATTRIB_INDEX=000000
COOBJECT:
OBJECT_INDEX=000001
ORDERID=ZO53-08IMZ
TOTVALUE:
VALUE_INDEX=000004
COST_ELEM=3224048
FIX_VALUE= 200,0000
DIST_KEY_FIX_VAL=2
The Return table is set to 0. Nothing happens.....I suspect something related to indexstructure or index is wrong..
Could anyone help me on that?
Kind Regards

WBS settled cost in sales order

Hi,
We settlele the WBS to Sales order and where we can see the settled cost in sales order.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,

Dear Sudha,
You can check if the costs are transferred from WBS element in CJI3 (you will see a credit posting for the WBS element)
You can check if the costs are debited to the Sales Order using KVBI (you wlll see a debit posting for the Sales Order item)
Note: Cost elements that you see could be a settlement cost element /original cost element based on the allocation structure used.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

CRM- Find Service contract from Internal Order Number

Hi Friends,
I would like to know how to get service contract from internal oredr number.
From service contract we can find internal order number by using CRM_ORDER_READ function module- table et_document_flow, but my requirement is how to find service contract from Internal order number.Any function module or BAPI available for this requierement ?
Regards
Vinayak Sapkal

Hi,
when the costs are transferred from CRM to R3, they are posted to an internal order. When a service order or incident is transferred to R3, we have to create an internal order for it, regardless of whether or not a contract has been assigned.
This is all linked to the logic used in CO to find the appropriate internal order. It works as follows:
The internal order is stored in the table IAOM_ASSIGNMENTS. This is accessed by a guid (the account assignment guid).
To get this guid, there is a second table IAOM_EXT_OBJ_INF. This table links the GUIDs coming from CRM, dependent on the CO Customizing for CRM (Mass Controlling, Header level, item level controlling etc.)
This is how we manage to link a service order to the internal order of a contract in the first place.
When we call CO, CO first looks for an assignment for the object guid passed. If a service order has been linked to a contract, nothing will be found for the object guid. CO will then check for assignments to the reference guid and find the contract entry.
If no contract has been assigned, CO will create an internal order based on the service order guid.
From a CRM point of view, costs are assigned directly to an item, and so it makes no sense to have a reference guid for the costs or the possibility to change the guid via BADI.
regards
Waman

Costing on Internal Orders with different plan versions

Hi,
Is it possible to carry out Costing on Internal Orders using different plan versions?
I would like to carry out more than one costing on Internal Order so that I could compare different versions. Maybe there are other parameters (other than plan versions) which can be used for executing different parallel costing.
Best wishes,
Karol

Hi Karol,
In Release 3.0, the following new planning functions are available in order planning:
<b>Copy plan versions</b>
In Release 3.0, you can plan order costs for internal orders in different versions. In contrast to earlier releases, you can now
1. change versions
2. copy versions
3. Here you can select :
the planned values to be copied: annual or total values
whether the planned values in the target version are to be retained or overwritten compare versions using the information system
Planned values are not revaluated in the target version (for example, when you change the value date).
Overhead and settlements are not copied and, if required, must be repeated in the target version
Regards,
Hemachandra K S
<b>Please, donot forget to mark the answer as Helpful, Very Helpful or Problem solved.</b>

Settle AUC without internal order

Is it possible to settle AUC without Internal Order???

Hello,
Yes, it is possible. You can settle AUC in two ways
1. through internal order (KO88)
2. Through distribution and settlement (AIAB and AIBU)
The major difference between the two is that in case of Internal Order you can establish budgets in the Internal Order which is Control the costs. But in case of direct posting to the AUC, you would not be able to control the cost.
In the Internal Order scenario all the cost is first pooled to the Order and then settled to the Asset at regular intervals. Where as in case of the second method all the expenses are posted directly to the AUC and then it is being Distributed and settled to various Assets as required
1. Asset settlement thought internal order is general used for assets under construction. All costs are pooled in the internal order. Periodically or whenever wants the internal order is settled (within a fiscal year) i.e. the amounts in the internal order are capitalized.
First create an internal order (KO01), take object class as investment and give investment profile. Now system asks and creates one AUC account under asset class 4001.
Then create settlement rule (KO02) and release the order (control data tab) Post some amounts (like wages or non-production material) to internal order. Then come to KO88, first take the automatic settlement and run.
The accounting entry passed is
Asset under construction a/c Dr
To Wages a/c
If you want to complete the settlement to auc, then take now full settlement option and run then accounting entry passed is
Asset a/c Dr
To Asset under construction a/c
While doing settlement in KO88, you can give any settlement period, posting period and asset date, but all should be in the same fiscal year. If you want to close the order go to KO02, give order number and take control data tab and click on technical complete tab on the screen and save. Internal order will be closed.
2. If your AUC is under Asset class 4000
this auc account is created directly because of direct postings to AUC account. Posting are made through F-90 For example
AUC a/c dr
To vendor or bank account
Go to AIAB ---> Give distribution rule and go to AIBU --> Settle the asset
Entry passed is
Asset a/c Dr
To AUC a/c
Thanks
Para

TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for