Cost elements for TAX expenses

Dear all,
Is it necessory to create cost elements for following GL's ??
We are not going to implement PCA here.We are going to implement Product Costing.
50000031     EXCISE DUTY - PURHASE
50000032     SALES TAX  C.S.T-PUR
50000033     SALES TAX  M.S.T-PUR
50000034     EXCISE REBATE CENVAT
50000035     SALES TAX (PUR)
50000044     EXCISE REBATE CONSUM
50100000     CLOSING STOCK OF SEM
50100001     CLOSING STOCK OF FIN
50100002     OPENING STOCK - SEMI
50100003     OPENING STOCK - FINI
50100058     ROUNDING OFF
50100138     Cost of Goods Sold
50200011     PREVIOUS YEAR EXPENS
50200012     PREVIOUS YEAR TAXES
50200013     Doubtful Advances Provisions
50200014     Doubtful Debts Provisions
50200015     Realized Loss on Foregn exchange
50200016     Unrealized Loss on Foregn exchange
Thanks & regards,
Ranjeet

Ranjeet
Check your Previous threads answer
Anup

Similar Messages

  • Cost centre and GL A/c is not getting picked up for tax expenses

    i have  incoice from vendor for $ 106 and i pay $100 to vendor and $6 in tax
    i want to use the GL A/c and cost centre to pay $6 in tax. we want to use the same GL A/c and cost centre related to that PO only for tax expenses. and for another PO  another GL and cost centre related to that PO for tax exp
    What configuration i need?

    Hi,
    your tax expense is a liability a/c which is not supposed to be booked in cost centre.
    what is the purpose of bringing it to the cost centre..
    Regards,
    Divraj

  • Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR

    Hi, i work for real estate company and we just implemented SAP. were on our process of closing our books and we are tied by error during PS settlement. House repair, which is an income statement account and cost element as well, are monitored in Project Systems with settlement rule set to GL. Postings will initially be posted as Project Cost WBS and will be settled to house repair GL. however, someone advised us that only balance sheet accounts should be settled to GL. Cost and expenses should be settled to Cost Center and so we changed the configuration and business process to posting costs directly to GL house repair and settlemet rule is to be settled to CTR. After the change in configurations and settlement rule, we still cannot process settlement due to this error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR". Please help, i may have missed a step in system configurations. Thanks thanks

    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR
    Check in OKO6 whether you have defined the required Settlement Cost Element to the allocation structure.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Two Cost Element for the same GL

    Hi,
    We have 2 Company Codes - 1000 & 2000. We are using same CoA in both the Company Codes. We have a GL, say 12345678 for posting short/excess amount. So during MIRO, the accounting entry would be:
    GR/IR a/c dr.          10,000
    GL 12345678                  2
                       Vendor            10,002
    GL 12345678 would be dr or Cr would depend on short/excess amount.
    We have created Cost Element for this GL 12345678. If I post the MIRO without attaching a Cost Center to this Cost Element system thows an error to attach the Cost Center. I have separate Cost Center for Company Codes 1000 & 2000 however I can only put one Cost Center in this Cost Element.
    Can anyone advice how can I post the above mentioned entry with different Cost Center. This line item (GL 12345678) is generated automatically and the Cost Center field is greyed out hence I don't have option to enter the Cost Center during MIRO. I checked the FSG of this GL, Cost Center field is 'Optional' over there.
    Thanks,
    Sandy

    Solution Option* -You can  assign Differant Cost Centers to Company Code 1000 and Company Code 2000 in OKB9 Transaction Code.Follow the  below process....
    --- Go to OKB9
    --- Select New Entries button
    --- Give the Company Code 1000 in first row and 2000 in 2nd row
    --- Enter the Cost element 12345678 for company code 1000 and 2000
    --- Enter the relevent cost centers  for company code 1000 and 2000
    --- Select Save
    Thanks
    Fit 4 Nothing

  • How to get Cost element for a component in co03 cost analysis report

    Hi,
    I'm using table COSP to find the quantity for a production order component.  However, I need to identify the cost element first to get the unique data.  In CO03 cost analysis report, there is cost element for the component.  Does anyone know how to get it ?
    Thanks.

    CSKA stores the basic info about the cost element
    There is no data in CSKB.
    I'm trying to use different tables to get the cost element.
    AUFK, AFKO, AFPO, RESB, ...but no luck...

  • COPA: how to identify which cost element for sender and receiver in IMG

    Hi Guru,
    I know my cost element for sender and receiver from the settlement document, but where in IMG, i can identify how it settup to use which cost element for my sender - order , which cost element should be used for my reciever profit segment.
    Thanks,
    Kick

    Hi,
    Go to KEI1
    Select your transfer structure
    double click on assignment lines
    check the source and value fields to get the mapping.
    Regards,
    Sridevi
    <i><b>Pls. assign points, if useful</b></i>

  • Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA

    Hi,
    While settling the AUC internal order,i am gettingg the below error.Kindly advice me
    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
    Message no. KD506
    Diagnosis
    In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
    Procedure
    Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi Supriya,
    Go to SPRO-> Controlling > Internal orders>Actual postings>Settlement> Maintain Allocation structures & choose A1 and go to assignment, select the relevant category like raw material / consumption and then go to source, check the range of cost elements first then click the settlement cos t element and under that choose FXA and define the settlement cost element which must be created under 22 category.
    After maintainig the above, you will not get the error anymore.
    Thanks & Regards
    Anuj Agarwal

  • Cost elements for WIP (TCODE : OKGA)

    Hi All,
    I am working with Production Order wip calculation, varaince and settlement.
    In the RA key configuraion,(for WIP calculation)In OKGA, tcode we define, the cost elements for a perticular line id, for WIP calculation.
    I wanted to know, what is the purpose of these two cost elements.
    If I execute line item report, I dont see any value on these cost elements, after wip calc and settlement.
    However, I see the work in process on it, in the layout. I want to know, the exact purpose of these cost elements assignment.
    Is there any internal controlling document that is getting posted?
    Regards
    SR

    Hi Swastik,
    Those cost elements (category 31) are used to calculate and store WIP values at the detailed level of so called line IDs.
    Line IDs are groups of cost elements that were posted to production order.
    For example you can calculate and store WIP separately for Raw Materials, Semis, Activities and overhead.
    You can also settle them to different GL Accounts via mapping in txn.OKG8.
    Hope it helps,
    Szymon

  • Can we create a cost element for a Balance Sheet account?

    Hi folks,
    Is it possible to create a cost element for a balance sheet account? If yes, what are the scenerios we would need it and how is it done?
    thanks in advance

    Hello
    Please review the below information regarding cost elements category 90 : Financial Accounting Balance Sheet Accounts                                                                               
    Category 90  is automatically assigned when you create cost elements in CO whose   general ledger accounts in FI are asset reconciliation accounts            
    (special balance sheet accounts), not income statement accounts. You       
    cannot change this category in CO master data maintenance.                                                                               
    FI does not require CO account assignments to cost elements of             
    category 90. However, if you enter an account assignment, it is only       
    recorded statistically for real objects.                                                                               
    Category 90 allows you to check order or project budgets for fixed         
    asset procurement. To do so, enter the investment order or WBS element     
    in the corresponding field in the asset master. The Asset Management       
    component ensures that the order or element automatically appears in       
    the document when you access the asset procurement.                        
    The R/3 System debits the order/WBS element statistically in the           
    Controlling component, which you can then monitor with availability        
    control.                                                                   
    You can treat cost elements of category 90 as activity-independent as      
    part of cost center planning. 
    Also see note 75980  for further information.  From the note:
      The use of cost element category 90 is only provided in the standard        
      system in the following two cases:                                                                               
    1.  As of Release 3.0G, asset acquisitions and down payments which are      
          assigned directly to a fixed asset or asset under construction can      
          be assigned to an account on internal orders or WBS elements            
          statistically. In this manner, for example, an availability check       
          can be triggered on the order or the WBS element for asset posting.                                                                               
    2.  As of Release 4.0, cost elements of category 90 can also be created     
          for material stock accounts to display material make-to-order stocks    
          on sales orders or customer projects.                                   
    Regards
    Javier Reviriego

  • Is there a way to bypass activity type/ cost element for CJ20n Activity?

    Hi Experts,
    Is there a way to bypass the activity type set in the Internal tab of a particular activity in CJ20n?
    Here's a background of the scenario:.
    - In CJ20n, under WBS element 100->Network 10->Activity 1, under the internal tab, the activity type set up is ACT1
    - Under person assignment, I have 2 resources assigned Person 1 and Person 2, with the following values:
      Person 1          Work: 1.0h Dur. 10D
      Person 2          Work: 2.0h Dur. 15D
    - In infotype 135, person 1 has a cost element set as ACT2 and person 2 has a cost element ACT3.
    - The problem is that when you bring up the Plan/ Actual comparision report (ctrl+F11 in CJ20n), the costs are consolidated for ACT1 and negates the cost elements for Person 1 and Person 2
    Is there a way to bypass this and use the individual cost elements set up for person 1 and person 2?

    I dont think this is possible for the scenario that you explained. I mean, you have a single activity which has 2 resources assigned and each of these resources has a different activity type. Standard SAP allows only 1 activity type for an activity.
    Just a query, why dont you create 2 different activities for these resources since the activity types are diff for both?

  • Want to change the cost element for a activity type (KP26)

    Hi,
    I want to change the Allocation cost element for an activity type in KP26. I have already changed the cost element in the activity master data in KL02. Now i want to change it in KP26. I am trying to delete the existing line item in KP26  to create the new line item with the new cost element, but system not allowing to delete the existing one. It throws the error message ""Allocations with XXXXXXX/XXXX (Cost center/Activity type)  exist ; deletion not possible". Can someone please help me to change the cost element?
    Regards
    Dev

    Hi Rao and Lalit,
    Thanx for you people for helping me. i havin gone doubt here. If i am deleting the existing line in KP26 and create new line with appropriage cost element will it be cause the existing datas? I don't want to go for another activity type, because our process is a complex process exist all over the world in more than 300 company codes. So i want to use the existing activity type but want to change the allocation cost element alone. Is there any possibility to change the cost element alone?
    Regards,
    Dev

  • Using Primay cost element instead of secondary cost element for expenses tr

    Hai  SAP Guru
    WE are developer company, so when a land is acquired we create the project under business development with nomenclature "BD/LG/01" with  corporate  profit centre linked to it (as we are not sure if the project takes of due to various issues.)
    When the project commences we create another project structure with nomenclature "BE/LG/01u201D  with new profit centre.
    So when we transfer the cost lying in u201C BD u201D  project to u201C BE u201C project by giving settlement profile, the cost get transferred using secondary cost element. when we see the statement through CJI3 report the cost would have get transferred but when we
    see the report through Finance Profit Centre report the cost would have not transferred.
    So in order to get the report in profit centre, can we use primary cost element instead of secondary cost element, if we use the primary cost element what the consequence and what care needs to be taken for settlement.
    Thanks.

    Thanks.

  • When not to create cost elements for P&L accounts? Implications?

    I noticed some P&L gl accounts are not created as cost elements eg. R&D expense, COGS (posted during SD delivery), sales (posted during SD billing), freight charges, production variance (posted during prod.order settlement), etc.. I'm thinking if cost elements are not created, FI and CO will not reconcile.
    Example of our SD delivery posting :
    Debit   COGS (sales order assignment)
    Credit    Stock
    From above posting, there is amount posted to COGS gl account but no CO assignment except for sales order. Is there supposed to be a follow-up to this posting to reconcile FI with CO ? Or is our setup wrong?
    Fyi we do not use CO-PA.
    Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: Pixel8 ation on Aug 3, 2010 5:16 PM

    Hi,
    Sorry, I probably confused things by mentioning Revenue. Your settings are correct, with Revenue defined as a revenue element (11) rather than a cost element (1).
    With respect to WIP (P&L), I would create it as a cost element, since it represents the absorption of cost centre costs and materials into the production of goods, even though the goods are not yet complete. When the goods are completed they will be credited in CO-OM and debited to stock using a similar entry. The impact of these credits (to WIP or to Stock) is to move costs out of CO-OM into the goods produced (CoGS). In CO-OM, the net result of Costs less credits to WIP/Stock, indicates the efficiency of your cost centres or the accuracy of your standards.
    I would also create the manufacturing variance accounts as Cost Elements and settle them back to your production costs centres (or possibly CO-PA if you used it), since they are also a reflection of the efficiency of your cost centres - i.e. if a Cost Centre manager is not achieving the standards, (s)he should be accountable for the variance, and if you are concerned about reconciling CO-OM and the costs in P&L, you won't reconcile if the variances aren't posted back to CO.
    Regards,
    Marc

  • G/L accounts or cost elements for maintenance order

    Hi,
    Can anybody explain the following.
    1- What are the applications of inventory and consumption cost element / GL accounts, while posting goods issuance, good receipt and maintain service entry sheet with reference of maintenance orders' reservations and purchase requisitions? I want to know which cost element or GL account is debit and credit during every posting. And What are their impacts on maintenance order?
    2- What is the purpose of "source" (cost element group) and "settlement cost element assignment" in allocation structure when we want settle maintenance order on cost center?
    3- On which accounting term, the maintenance order should be settled, cost center or GL account? what is the best practices?
    Regards,

    Goods Issue & Goods Receipt:
    In OBYC, G/L account for Inventory posting & Offset account for that Inventory posting will be maintained. Inventory posting will be BSX & Offset will be GBB.
    In Material Master, valuation class will be assigned. Based on this valuation class, this entry will be taken.
    Service Entry Sheet:
    Problem with Service Entry Sheet creation through ML81N
    service entry sheet

  • Cost elements for account Profit or loss on exchange rate valuation

    I am running transaction F110 and among the invoices to be paid there are foreign denominated invoices. I have 4 business areas set up and have one GL account where all the gains and losses arising from the exchange rate fluctuation are posted (this account has been assigned a cost element).
    When I run F110 i get error that the gain/loss on valuation account requires a CO object. I thot the system would be able to determine all the CO objects from the invoices selected for payment. In a payment run, there are a number of invoices belonging to different CO objects.
    Is there a way i can get around this. If i delete the cost element will i be able to draw up financial satements per business area.

    Hi,
    You can set up in OKB9 for Co Object determination.
    You can set Business Area as mandatory in OKB9 and then click on Detail per business Area and another screen will open up, there you can enter, Cost center against Business Areas.
    This will resolve your issue.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

Maybe you are looking for