Cost roll up Process...

Dear Experts,
Please clarify the below issue.
Split valuation and Material Ledger is active for my client.
During 2010, they have changed price control indicator to Standard for Raw material.
One SFG, they have in-house production and external procurement (Domestic and Import)
Example:
If they maintain three prices for SFG:
In house: Rs 1/-
Import: Rs 2/-
Domestic: Rs 1.50/-
Then, during the cost roll up process what price the system will consider for SFG.
Thanks in advance..
Meena

Hi,
I am not suer I fully understand your question but here is some text from sap.help.com
The system first calculates the costs for the materials with the lowest costing level and assigns them to cost components.
The materials in the next highest costing level (such as semifinished materials) are then costed. The costs for the materials costed first are rolled up and become part of the costs of goods sold in the next highest level.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/7e/cb7ec743a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Regards.Declan

Similar Messages

Cost roll process

Hi
What is cost roll process > what is its purpose and how it is configured ? Is it in any way concerned to cost estimate of the material
please help
Pushkaraj

Hi,
I am not suer I fully understand your question but here is some text from sap.help.com
The system first calculates the costs for the materials with the lowest costing level and assigns them to cost components.
The materials in the next highest costing level (such as semifinished materials) are then costed. The costs for the materials costed first are rolled up and become part of the costs of goods sold in the next highest level.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/7e/cb7ec743a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Regards.Declan

Work Order Cost Rolling Up to WBS Element!

Hi everyone,
I created a Project A with WBS structure in PS (not statistical WBS structure). And then I assigned a work order to one of the WBS element A.0001. I did not post any cost to the WBS element directly. I only charged $1000 to the work order. Now when I use CN41N to generate the cost report and I found the $1000 in work order rolled up to WBS element A.0001 ($1000 showed at work order level and also WBS element level). Then I settled $1000 in the work order to a WBS element C.0001 in Project C. When I run CN41N again to see the cost in Project A, the $1000 still showed up at work order level, but it did not show up at WBS element level A.0001. I need the cost to roll up at WBS element level also, so this is a big problem for me.
I did several test. Assigned another work order to this WBS element A.0001 and charged another $1000 to the work order. Then I settled them to cost center directly instead of to WBS element. The $1000 showed up at the work order level and also at WBS element level (the cost rolled up from work order to the WBS element in that report). Then I tried to settle to GL account, the cost will roll up to WBS element too.
So I found only when I settle the cost to WBS element, the cost won't roll up. I think it might be a configuration problem. Does anyone know where I need to configure in order to let the cost roll up to the WBS element after I settle the Work order to a WBS elements?
Really appreciate your help!
Ting

Hi Martina,
This is awesome, very helpful! Now I know how to deal with it.
Thanks a lot!
Ting

Cost-Roll take follow-up material upon discontinuation effective-out date ?

Dear Expert,
If we use discontinuation/follow-up material, during Cost-Roll (CK11N), SAP will take default cost from discontinued material even if follow-up material is effective.
How to make SAP take cost of follow-up material after/on effective-out date ?
Example :
Parent "A" contains component "B" qty 3, to be follow-up with component "C" upon discontinuation of "B" on effective-out dated 1st Nov'07, and like-wise to take std cost of "B' before 1st Nov'07 cost-roll.
Thus, when I roll cost in December, I hope SAP would calculate for std cost of A to include std cost of "C" (for cost-roll after 1st Nov'07).
Setting :
Material Master of "B" MRP4 view :
- Discontinuation Indicator = 1
- Effective-out date = 1st Nov'07
- Follow-up Material = "C"
BOM of Parent "A" :
- Component "B" indicate discontinuation group "A1"
- Add component "C" and indicate follow-up group "A1".
Thanks for your guidance !

Hello,
We are having the same issue: is a BOM for costing the only way to handle this ? Controlling dept. here fear they wouldn't be maintained as accurately as the production ones (and they are right). We were also thinking to set the phased out materials (B in your example) as cost irrelevant when you add to new material in the BOM...and start costing the father (A in your example) directly with the new component. I would appreciate a lot to hear other examples of dealing with this issue if anybody has.
Thanks a lot,
Olivier

Costing varients in process order

Dear Gurus
Can u tell where we r assigning costing varients in process order cofiguration side (Planned & Actual)
Thanks & Regards
Ragesh

You have to assign these costing variants in COR4 transaction in controlling tab for process orders.
Regards
TAJUDDIN

Target cost calculation in Process Order based on Variance Calculation

Hi all,
I have a question on Target cost calculation in Process Order. My understanding is, the Target Costs gets calculated when the confirmation and GR is made for the Process Order.
But if the confirmation/GR is not done, whether the target costs gets calculated for only the activity types after the Variance Calculation (KKS2).
I have two scenarios. In one, the target costs got calculated for the activity types without the confirmation/GR after the Variance calculation.
In another scenario, the target costs are not getting calculated for the activity types without the confirmation/GR if I try to do the variance calculation in KKS2.
SO i want to know which scenario is correct?
Can anyone answer this question?
Thanks and Regards,
Brijesh

Hi,
In general, the target costs are calculated once you deliver the order.
Target costs for the components and the activities are updated only once you deliver the order and the target cost for the finished product gets updated when you do the variance calculation.
Consider your scenario number 1 - you said the target costs got calculated for activity types without confirmation / GR after variance calculation.
Now, if the order is not having any status like PDLV, DLV or TECO it will not calculate the variances in the first place.
Your second scenario is correct - without GR the system does not calculate any target costs. Also it will not calculate any variances because the order status is still not DLV.
Best Regards,
Sameer

Cost roll up for financial reporting

Hi Experts,
I have requirement to have financial and management reporting with cost roll up.
As per my understanding, cost roll up happen based on cost center and profit center relationship.
But in my scenario, i have org unit defined as parent only but not maintained as cost center or profit center. (shown below)
In such case, will cost roll up function works??
Is org unit still available for reporting (without cost center and profit center)?
Thanks in advance
Govind Sharma

Hi Puru,
We dont need to use parent cost centers for cost collection, parent cost centers are only use for reporting (group or local reporting).
Business need all accounting have to be perrfomed at child level only- as shown below
Kindly let me know if you need more details on the same.
Thanks
Govind Sharma

Error in Including Roll Up Process Type into Process Chain

Dear Experts,
On BI 7.0, I found an error, when including the Roll Up Process Type into my process chain. The sequence of my first process chain looks like this.
Start -> Execute Infopackage -> Execute DTP to load data to DSO -> Delete Cube Index -> Execute DTP to load data to cube -> Create Cube Index -> Roll Up
I found this error when activating the process chain
'No type "Delete Index" process can be in front of process "Roll Up of Filled Aggregates/BIA Indexes" variable ROLLUP_ZHRF_C04
Then, after looking through the forum, I found someone suggest using 'Initial Fill' before 'Roll Up'. I followed his sugguestion, so my second process chain looks like this.
Start -> Execute Infopackage -> Execute DTP to load data to DSO -> Delete Cube Index -> Execute DTP to load data to cube -> Create Cube Index -> Initial Fill -> Roll Up
The same message is shown; however, this time it just a warning message instead of the error msg.
1) How can I solve this problem?
2) In which sequence of process types I should take for my process chain?
3) Must I always use the Initial Fill before the Roll Up in the process chain?

Hello,
This issue is with patch 16 of BI. The only solution i think is you need to create a local chain with start process -> rollup and include all the roll up cubes in that variant and include this local chain at the end of the main chain. Hope this helps.
REgds,
Shashank

PLANNED AND ACTUAL COST IN A PROCESS ORDER

From where the planned cost of material and activity types in cost itemizationafter creation flow ?From where the actual cost of a material and activity types in cost analysis of process order after confirmation flow?

You may be knowing you give Costing Variants ( Both actual as well as Planned ) in Order type. These Costing variants contains Valuation variants which says which costs are to be taken while creation ( for Planned Cost ) and Actual cost ( while confirming and Moving Goods) to be calculate. These Variants decides mode of Cost Flows.
Now, Data in Planned costs are Standard Cost figures or Current prices for material or Planned Prices of Activities.
As far as Actual costs are considered it may be the price for the consumed quantity @ the moving average price of the day or activity price for the qty. consumed which include up planned consumption too.....
Reward if you find useful

Cost roll

Hi,
In cost roll for a material, when the material picks up PO price the cost is flowing correctly to the material and surcharge cost components but when there is no PO it picks up planned price but the price goes to surcharge instead of material, what could be the reason? how can we make the cost to flow to material cost component instead of surcharge.
Thank you.

Hi,
The Mass edit program are meant to change the cost for specific item or range. Once you perform the mass edit why are you perfroming the cost roll up again?
The ideal Scenario is that you should do cost rollup. If you find that no the cost of materail / material overhead is incorrect and you need to change it with specific value. The you should use mass edit to perfrom the cost change.
Also if you do it vice versa (current case) the cost that is rolled up in cost roll up is and should mandatory update th cost that has been perviously updated by mass edit.

Cost Roll-Inventory Evaluation

Hi we recently did a cost roll after Go Live as we had some Problems with Master Data ,so after doing Cost roll the inventory gone up by $50K,so we need to do some adjustment to our inventory as our Stock Material Inventory Account Shows a increased amount of $50K when compared to before cost roll.
Could anyone please suggest What are the entries can be made so that it can reflect in the company Income Statement?
Regards,,,
Hartz

Hi,
There are 2 ways to handle this.
1. Use CKR1 and delete the wrong cost roll up and redo Ck11n with correct materials in BOM and routing.
2. Use MR21 and reduce the price of the material directly.
Above both solutions will reduce the stock value.
Vijay

Graphing measurement versus position for a continuous roll based process

I am working on a DAQ application for a continuous roll-based process. What I want to do is plot measurement versus position. What is unique is that the graph x axis has to reset for each new roll that is created for the process. i.e. I want to plot measurement versus position in a roll. The attached file shows what I am trying to do. Has anyone tried this? Is it even possible to have positive numbers on both sides of a zero point in a graph?
Thanks,
John
Attachments:
Labview Roll Graph.jpg ‏33 KB

John,
Unfortunately, there wouldn't be a way to have an arbitrarily numbered x-axis as you are describing. In cartesian coordinates, you cannot have repeated points like this.
If you know how many points are acquired per roll, one way to do this is to clear a charts history after this number of points and for every clear increment a roll counter. See the attached VI for an idea of what I'm talking about.
Regards,
Craig D
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
Attachments:
Clear Chart History.vi ‏18 KB

Standard Cost from External Process

Hi Experts.
I have a finished goods procured from other plant, need to send for additional process
I want capture the cost for additional process without Purchase Info.
I maintained the price details in the routing external process tab.price unit & net price.
But while doing the CK11N it is not picking these cost element.
Pls explain what would be the additional setting I suppose to do.

Dear Sriram,
Check what costing variant are you using in the initial screen of CK11N,now take this costing variant
and check in OKKN--->(click on)valuation variant--->(Click on )Ext.Processing and check the priority
defined,only if the value is set as price from operation,then the system picks up the value maintained
in the routing(operation),also ensure the costing relevancy is set in the control key of that particular
operation.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Is there away to define FIFO costing to a Process Manufacturing Organizatio

Hi Experts,
This is in R12.1.1.
The requirement is process manufacturing should be in FIFO Costing.
However I haven't read any FIFO costing from oracle documentation.
Is there way to assign FIFO costing to a Process Manufacturing enabled Organization?
Please share links if you have regarding this requirements.
Thanks,
Nuel

Hi,
Using the ParallelModel.seq as the base
The new process model in the zip file has a new step in the Initialize TestSocket sequence which generates a new Client Sequence File path based on the Computer Motherboard Test Sequence.seq string.
This new path name is passed as a parameter to the Create Test Socket Execution for each of the test socket executions.
Unzip the file and place the new Process Model into \Components\User\Model\TestStand and place the test sequences into the folder \Examples\Demo\LabVIEW\Computer Motherboard Test.
Launch the seq editor and set the Station Model to use the new Pocess model ( you can set it back when you have finished). Open one of the new test sequences and select the Test UUTs to start the sequences. The
four new sequences will be launched.
I can see that the sequence that you initially open wont be your test sequence but a sequence that allows your test selection or sets up the sequences to run, setups your process model to run etc.
(This new Process Model sequence is from Teststand 2.01 beta, so if you have any problems then cut the new step and paste it into your ParallelModel sequence)
Hope this is a start
Regards
Ray Farmer
Regards
Ray Farmer
Attachments:
New_Process_Model.zip ‏54 KB

Cost component or cost roll-up issue

Hi
This is with reference to new issue that surfaced in costing recently. In the company I am working for cost component structure setup is like this : 1) raw material is considered as variable cost 2) activity as fixed and when it rolls-up cost of semifinished will have both fixed and variable since fixed and variable are active for semifinished and that's way its set up for finished goods.
The above set up was designed based upon existing business process. As per that process raw material is always procured from external vendor. Recently for the one of the new plant the process changed a bit i.e. raw material is manufactured. Now the manufactured and purchased raw material flows to same GL account. With the existing set up the system allowed to create product estimate and PREM cost for both manufactured and purchased raw material. But recently the system started giving an error saying that fixed cost field is not activated for raw material. The error makes sense but we don't understand how it worked before and what triggered this error now.
Did anybody come across this issue?
Thanks
Joseph

Hi,
May be for the material in new plant, you may have some fixed cost , through some activity type etc.. Please check.
You can always change your cost component in OKTZ to allow for fixed cost also. But we careful while doing this , as after this you wont be able to see the pased saved data in cost component view. As based on cost component strcuture SAP alling the cost value field in KEPH table and it fixed and variable are stored in two different vaue field in KEPH.
Regards
Ranjan Kumar

Cost roll up Process...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for