Costing run ck11n

Dear experts,
I am working on process order scenario. I have one FG which is maintaines as raw material.
It has a BOM , master recipe, prod. version.
but when I do CK11N, it is not picking BOM & REcipe.
Plz guide where I am missing
Thanks & regards,
sachin ghogale

Dear Sameer,
Please check what's your quantity structure date,costing date from in CK11N and also the valdidity
dates of your BOM and Master recipe.All these dates should match.
Are you using ECM for BOM creation?If so means ,if you have used change number with release key
means,check whether the release key has been set or not in CC03,If no means,first set and then check.
Check and revert back.
If not solved means,then you have to ask your CO consultant for further help.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Similar Messages

Does Costing Run CK11n update the Info record?

Hi,
Will a costing run (Transaction CK11n) update the purchasing info record? In the source list for the material, the vendor is fixed.
Sincerely,
Ketan

No, Costing runs will only update the material with standard costs. For this standard costs it might refer the price maintained in the info-record, but the only update is on the material master, nowhere else

Difference in last year and current year Cost Run (CK11N)

Hi Experts,
I am getting the difference in Costing Run as explained below,
1, Costing Run of year 2009 is not picking the two overheads as against 2008.
What may be the couse, all overhead keys are extended to year 2009.
Waiting for your reply.
Sham

Hi,
Please check the validity of those 2 overhead rates. Probably the validity is till 12/31/2008, that's why it is not picking. In that case you can create another row with validity dates from 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009 or 12/31/9999 as the case may be.
The path for the same is mentioned below:
IMG>Controlling>Product Cost Controlling>Product Cost Planning>Basic Settings for Material Costing>Overhead>Costing Sheet:Components>Define Percentage Overhead.
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

ERROR in COST RUN (MSG NO K0 105)

While running cost run CK11N or CK40N. I am getting Error msg. Group 2950 doest not Exit (K0105).
But Cost Element Group 2950 is available.
Regards,
Velmurugan.S

Can you cross check the Cost Element assign to your Credit Keys?
Did you define it by Origin Group? Does that correspond to the one (if any) on your Material Master?
Cheers.

Cost Center Planning done but correct price is no shouing in Costing run

Hi,
In cost center activity planning (KP26). i have planned cost of Setup Activity type is 10 rs per 1 min (Fixed). but when i am running Costing run (CK11N) it is not showing correct price which we have given in cost center planning (KP26).
Cost Element category is 43
in Work center i assigned cost Center and setup activity.
So What is the problem. is this problem related to CO or from Workceter.
anybody could help on this.
Thanks
NAG

Dear,
If it is low consumable material then remove its cost relevency from BOM item details. So it will not come in costing run.
Also refer this link,
Order Costing in diffrent UOM
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

CK11n Costing Run does not pull purchasing price from info record.

Hi,
I have material which is a semi finished product (Material type: SEMI) and is purchased from a fixed vendor (specified in the source list).
The costing run does not pick up the purchasing price from the purchasing info record but
instead incorrectly picks up the standard price from the material master (Costing 2 view).
Can you please help me solve this issue?
Thanks,
Ketan

Execute OPL1
or
SPRo>>IMG>>Controlling>>Product Cost Controlling>>Cost Object Controlling>>Product Cost by Order>>manufacturing Order>>Check Costing Variants for Manufacturing Orders (PP)
Select the costing variant in the table from "Change Costing Variant: Overview" Overview Screen
Click Detail Button
Click Valuation Variant Button in the Control Tab
Change View Valaution Variant Detail Screen Appears
In Material Valuation Tab Set Price from Purchase Inforecord as Priority 1 if you want to use Price from Purchase Inforecord for semi-finished product during CK11N
You can list down Priority 2 to 5 depending on your requirement
This would solve your problem
Edited by: Paul Pandian on Mar 17, 2009 3:01 AM

Scrap Costing while CK11N Std Cost Run

Dear CO Experts,
I want know that scrap costing while run CK11N, how the system takes either Assemble, Operation & Component scraps?
Can any body give brief clarification regarding this. Is there any to take scrap is as by product ?
Normally we can give either Material Master or BOM as percentage.
Regards,
KBREDDY.

Hi ,
Please refer to the following Link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb84ab43a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm

Costing Run Error

Hi All,
I am currently trying to roll cost for materials but have an error that i can not seem to resolve, i hope someone can assist me and help me understand.
While rolling the cost for a specific material the MFG Overhead cost is not being calculated correctly, i have looked at the routings for this material and do see where the error might stem from, but i do not think it can be corrected from there.
The error is that in the routing the cost for MFG Overhead is calculated by adding Labour (1H) and Setup (0.017) and MFG Overhead = 1.017. The lot size of this material is 300 but when roll up the cost with CK11N per unit the Set up value is 0.003 but the MFG Overhead does not calculate in the same fashion it remains as 1.017 (it should be 1.017/300 = 0.0033 ) This is causing a massive discrepancy in costing. Now one solution is that the amount can be corrected externally and then update the routing and run the costing, but there will be an issue if the lot size is increased in the future (instead of 300 the lot size is increased to 400, now the routing will have to be change to 1.017/400 = 0.0025). How can i correct the logic within SAP? I have tried configuring the costing sheet, but i am not not sure where to change it. In my costing run i am using costing variant PPC1.
I have tried being as detailed as possible, and i hope it is coherent.
I would really appreciate you help and points will be awarded.
Thanks in advance

Hi Althea,
Thank you for your response.
In the routing we have removed the MFG Overhead and now are using the Costing Sheet to calculate the Overhead. I think i have updated everything, eg costing sheet, costing sheet components, percentage overhead rates, costing variants. But now the requirement has changed again!!!! Just when you think you have crawled your way out of a ditch, someone pulls you back in.
In the legacy system they were able to calculate overhead in relation to cost centers ( Setup, Labor and Overhead for 403, Setup, Labor and Overhead for 403B and for 407 etc), but in the costing sheet you can only enter one cost center, is it possible to enter multiple cost centers and where would i do that?
Now i had a cost element for Overhead, but in the cost element category was incorrectly selected as 43 (Internal activity allocation) instead of 41 (Overhead rates) now when i am trying to use select that Cost Element in the Costing Sheet under the credit area it will not allow me to save it. I have created a new cost element but i am not certain what the impact might be
Please help!!!
Thanks in advance

Freight Calculation in Standard cost Run

Hi,
The requirement is while doing the standard cost calculation through CK11N / CK40N system should show seperately how much is freight plan cost &; how much is duty plan cost.e.g.
100 is material price as per condition PB00 Cost element 355100
10 is freight cost (ZFR1 10%) Cost element 363170
5 is duty cost (Zduty lets say 0.5%) Cost element 363171
So taotal cost will be 115
I wanted to get this in cost component wise. Client does not want manual intervention so do not want to go for additive cost method
I had tried through Purchasing info record. I have maintained the valuation variant accordingly. Assigned correct sub strategy to it & also maintained delivery cost button in the same screen to assign conditions to origin group.
Also I had maintained purchasing info record through me11 ; mainteined conditions there.
These above mentioned cost elements are mapped in cost component structure in T code OKTZ. Seperately for material ,freight &; duty
Now when I make a PO, system is showing correct calculation as per the conditions.When I do the GR the Freight &; duty is getting posted &; these GLs are having above mentioned primary cost elements . .So the primary cost element is also getting posted correctly.
Now the problem is
While doing the cost run system shows me Seperate cost for material as 100 , seperate for freight 10 & seperate for duty 5, but to the same cost element i.e. 355100. So all the cost is shown as material cost ; nothing is displayed as freight or duty
If I see the cost element report the corresponding value is flown to the corresponding cost element. But it is not reflecting in proper cost component in cost run
.Please guide me why this is happening. How can I resolve this
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi Ajay,
I was waiting for your reply.
As mentioned by you, I have mapped my cost component structure like Raw material, Freigh, Duty & assigned the corresponding cost elements to it.. But still in itemisation view it shows three values
consumption cost element 355100 - 100
consumption cost element 355100 - 10 (which should go to freight component where I have assigned the Freight cost element)
consumption cost element 355100 -5 (which should go to Duty component where I have assigned the Duty cost element)
FI entries are getting posted correctly. Values are flown to coresponding cost elements.
For the time being We will keep duty part side. We are discussing with client on this.
But, what could be the reason of this problem. How I can achieve the below mentioned result.
Cost component view
Raw material -100
Freight - 10
Duty - 5

Cost Run for Raw Material taking Standard Price instead of Moving Price

Hi all,
We ran a material costimate with normal components FG>SFG>RM. The RM price Control is set to
V (Moving Average Price) and for SFG & FG it is S(Std. Price). After we run CK11N, the price for
RM in Material Master changes as per Moving Price. We found that the RM Component is
costed based on Standard Price and not on the previous cost run Moving Average Price. After
certain period, if we again do cost run, the sytem is again picking up the standard price for costing
not the revised Moving Price. We have checked the Valuation Variant in the Costing Variant, where the strategy given is 1. Moving Average Price 2. Standard Price. We also tried to change the
sequence as 1. Price as per Purchase Info Record 2. Moving Average Price and 3. Standard Price and
also 1. Standard Price and 2. Moving Average Price. Our requirement is when we run the cost estimate the raw material has to pick the price of previous moving price stored in the Material Master. Kindly tell us where to set the indicator.
Thanks,
Sadashivan

Hi Srikanth,
Problem solved. I checked the sequence in Valuation Variant and modified in Valuation Variant for Plant which I have not set previously and now the system is working correctly.
Thanks,
Sadashivan

Delete cost run & reset release for current month

For our client we have created a new plant while testing this plant user created a material and they have done a cost run in ck11n with costing varient zv01 but in they released the cost with costing varient ppc1 with this system got inconsistency and not not allowing to release cost for any other material in the current month if we try to mark it for next month it is working fine.
we deleted the cost run through ck44 & ckr1 then also we are faceing the same problem. Kindly give me the solution how can i reset the release and later i want to run the ck11n & ck24 for material in the current month to do the production cycle. please consider this is as a urgent.
Regards
Chakravarthy

Hi
Whether you should do MR21 or not ??
a. If the cost estimate you reversed belongs to Last month and you are going to post the GR in last month then you should do MR21
b. if the cost estimate you reversed belongs to may and GR will also be posted in May - No need for Mr21... Because, even though you release cost on say, may 2nd, the cost always gets released from the Start of the Month
br, Ajay M

New costing run within same period for relased cost estimate

Hi All
Once we have run the costing run. The price is marked and released. Then If we have to again runthe costing run, system says price for the priod has been released and doesnt allow to proceed.
How to overcome this? Cant we run costing run as and when required and multiple times release it in the same period?
Please help me
Regards
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh,
I would like to know what is your requirement of running the Standard Cost Estimate for second or third time in the same period...?
If you feel that, Standard Cost which was marked and released needs to be updated as per the changes in BOM, Routing etc, you can still do it...
First, go to transaction code CKR1 (Re-organization of Cost Estimates), select the parameters like company code, plant, material (for which you want to reverse the Cost Estimate), select the radio button for "Current Standard Cost Estimate" and execute.
Then, Current Standard Cost Estimate will get reversed. You check for confirmation in the respective material master -- Costing 2 View whether the Current Planned Price has become blank or not.
Then you do CK11N and CK24 again for marking and releasing....
Try this and pls revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Costing run & MM period

Dear All,
Can someone clarify the below question :
Current period - 7
Date - 26.07-2011
Procedure 1 :
a) Run MMPV to close period 7 & open period 8 2011
b) Mark & execute Costing run
Procedure 2 :
a) Mark & execute Costing run
b) Run MMPV to close period 7 & open period 8 2011
Which is the right approach ? and also can we use both procedure in practise ?
Thanks in advance
Pbb

Hi
Simple answer is whichever period you are releasing the cost in, has to be open Both in MM & FI
If you wanna release in July, then P7needs to be open
By the way, 26 July is already gone... So, if your Costing date from was 26.07, you will have to rerun Ck11N as on today and then do CK24
br, Ajay M

Costing Run for all Hub Plants

I just want to understand from you regarding your Monthly Costing Run for all Plants.Actually we have Plant 5000 (Ruwais) which is our Manufacturing Plant having BOM.
We have two other Plants 7000 ( Shanghai ) and 7100 ( Singapore ) these are our Hub Plants not Manufacturing Plants and having no BOMs.
When we run our Monthly Costing Run for Plant 5000 using TCode (CK40N), its completes smoothly without any error.
We have to create a material cost estimate in monthly basis using TCode (KKPAN) before we execute cost estimate for both Plants 7000 & 7100.
We see these runs at the months end as very time consuming and we are not manage on time set for such update in SAP as part of the month end procedure.

Hello Yasir,
In our system I see that PC01 and PC02 are the same for cross plant costing:
1 - Future Cost Estimate - valid for fiscal year
2 - Current Cost Estimate - no age restriction
3 - Previous Cost estimate - no age restriction
If your system is set this way, then for cross plant costing, it does not make a difference which one you use.
If all plants are in one company code then the currency should be the same in all, so P rate should not be an issue.
Take one part number: What period and FY is your current cost estimate? What are the validity dates?
go to CK11n, input the part number; <b>hub plant</b> number and create cost estimate.
On the Tab "QTY STRUCT." you should see only Special procurement data, the plant number should be the mfg plant.
Look at the Costing Structure. Top level should be the part in hub plant.
The first level below should be the part in the mfg plant.
theTosts should be the same and I would expect it to be the same as the current cost estimate. (Pay attention to the currency)
If the first level from the mfg plant is not the same as the current cost estimate, you will need to figure out where that cost estimate is coming from.
If you would like to send screen shots of your cost estimate screens, give me your e-mail and I will contact you with pictures of what I expect to see.
Althea

Costing run for materials with special procurement key

Hello,
Since moving to ECC6, the costing run for materials with special procurement keys is not pulling the marked price from the materials the special procurement keys point to. Only the released prices are pulled.
Example:
Material A, plant A has a future price (costing 2 tab) of 100 and a current price of 99
Material A, plant B has special procurement key Z1 (costing 1 tab) which pulls the costing from Material A, plant A
In our old system (46c) the costing run for Material A, plant B would pull 100.
In ECC6, the costing run for Material A, plant B pulls 99
Anyone that can push me in the right direction?

Hi,
Based on the info provided thus far, the result that you notice in ECC 6.0 is right as it is picking the current standard price based on your setup.
Now why it is picking the future price in 4.6c, well for that you will have to do a detail check as in which variant is being used etc. I would suggest you to work with your CO personnel on this. Do a costing run for this particular material via CK11n using the variant which you mentioned & see the results.
Or if you can upload the screenshots (picasaweb or some other portal) of the valuation variant you're using in 4.6c, along with Acctng view 1 & 2, costing view 1 & 2 details of the material it would help to have a better understanding.
Regards,
Vivek

Costing run ck11n

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for