Create "result line" when defining scrambling rule

When defining scrambling rules, there is a button called "create result line".
I am not sure how to use this feature.
Could somebody give some hints?
Thanks a lot!

Suman:
Here are the steps to reproduce:
- at activity "scrambling data"
- try to create a field-set
- you are now at the screen with "Field-Sets" as the title on the screen top.
- change to "modify" mode by clicking the "pen" at the lower portion of the screen.
- put the mouse on the button which is next to the "trash bin", you can see a little popup "create result-line"
Could you help explain how to use this feature?
Thanks!

Similar Messages

When defining copy rules, only one source field allowed

Our users have requested the facility to allow them to copy pricing condition records when in in VK12 transaction. But when configuring the copy rules, we have come across the following problem:
When configuring copying rules for copying pricing condition records,
there is no possibility to use more than one source/target fields.
In our example, the condition table created for a certain pricing
access sequence contains keys such as Sales Organization, Sold-to Party
"and" Product Hierarchies level 1 to level 9 (e.g. PH1 - PH9) .
In the condition table definition, fields PH1 to PH9, although key
fields, are also defined as footer fields. This means that per sales
organization and sold-to party, we can create more than one condition
record based on different combinations of PH1 to PH9.
However when setting up copy rules for conditions in SPRO (SD -
Pricing Control - Copy Control for Conditions) to allow our users to copy the condition records, for a given Source /
Target table, the standard selection screen only allows us to define one Source / Target field.
In our case, this is not helpful. The configurator should be allowed
to select more than one source field (i.e. PH1 and PH2 and ..... PH9). At this moment,
we can only select as source field PH1 or PH2 or PH3., etc..
Steps for the Reconstruction:
- Run Spro.
- Select SD --> Pricing --> Pricing control --> Copy control for conditions -- > Copying rule for conditions
- Select 'New Entries'. Selection screen is displayed. The issue is that in this selection screen, the configurator is allowed to select only one source field. He should be allowed to select multiple fields.
Can you help us with this problem please?
Your help is much appreciated!
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:50 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:52 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:53 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:55 PM
Edited by: C. Hassink on Feb 2, 2008 3:56 PM

Hi Ralph,
I don't like that methode. Importing the same transport 15 times, each time changing the source-system mapping and making sure, that source-system gets the changes seems to be a huge source of errors, which will be hard to find.
What do you think of the following idea to solve the issue a totally different way:
All transfer-rules directly connected to the source-systems are stripped of all Coding, so there is a plain 1 by 1 transformation including 0logsys.
The InfoSources attached all lead to one ODS-Object, which has the only purpose to collect the data from the source-system without any transformation. So some fields a filled by a system and other fields maybe not.
The coding specific for source-systems is moved to transfer- / update-rules from that ODS-Object to the original ODS-Objects / Cubes and the "collecting" ODS-Object is emptied after every loading process.
This will result in a single point of change. It will be quite a huge program (maybe in startroutine) but it's the one and only point, where changes and corrections have to be made.
Regards
Robert

Two clips that are overlaid creates white line when rendered

In Final Cut Pro 7, I have copied a clip on top of itself in the timeline.
- The clip on top was then moved to the right so that the clip below would be seen slightly ( I needed a way to scoot the subject over while preserving the background on the left side. It is a black and white image over a flush gray background).
- When the clips are renderd, a white vertical line appears between the two clips
- The white line remains when exporting, and remains when it is uploaded to vimeo
- I need it to be gone! It is not there before rendering the timeline, but appears afterward!!!

What happens if you crop the right image a bit more? Does the line show up?
x

Offset feature not creating clean lines when repeating pattern/image

Using PSE11, I have been working at several repeating patterns using the offset feature, but am having a problem with images not having a clean seam when connecting different layers to create the pattern.
Any recommendations?
Thanks.
Here's a screenshot of an example..

Again, how you feel is really of no interest at all. How you feel will not get you one whit closer to solving the problem you have, and will probably even get in the way. If you have a problem we can help. Any scolding I do is about your aggression. Think of it this way. If someone stops you in the street and politely asks the way to the train station you'll be a lot more likely to help him or her than a person swearing at how awful the street maps are and generally being aggressive.
Obviously you don't get the fundamental difference, or you wouldn't have the problem. And yes, your photos can remain exactly as you organised them, but if that's what you wanted why did you then use iPhoto? You used the file manager for this job on windows, now you're trying to use a database for the job on your Mac. So you've switched OS and then the method of managing your photos.
Now you need to decide. Do you want to work exactly as you did on Windows? If so, don't use iPhoto, just use the Finder (that's the file manager on the Mac.) That's what you did on Windows.
If you want to use iPhoto, and so take advantage of the extra features that it has, then you'll need to rethink your way of working just a little but we can get very close to what you have now. But it will not be identical.
If you don't want to use iPhoto just copy your folders of images over to the Mac. Job done. Otherwise, come back and let us know how your folders are arranged and we can try help you adapt that to iPhoto.

How to create an EVENT when defining a JOB

Hi,
I would like to run an abap program in background after a process order has been saved (transactions COR1-COR2).
In the save exit (EXIT_SAPLCOZV_001) of the process order, I create the job that will run the abap program. after the process order is saved
I created an event with SM62 but I do not know how to set it up.
Or may be there is another solution.
Thanks for your help.

You can use the function module BP_EVENT_RAISE to raise the event. This can be called inside your user exit.
First create an event in SM62.
Now go to SM36 and create the job and give the ABAP program name you want to execute. Under START DATE select option AFTER EVENT. Then enter your SAP event name. After entering other information save the job.
Please see this site for more info.
http://www.sapfans.com/sapfans/sapfaq/robert.htm
Events are mainly used to trigger from outside SAP.
Thanks
Vinod
Message was edited by: Vinod C

KKA3 "Do not create line IDs of 'Settlement' cat. when defining assignmnt"

Hi gurus,
when i am runing KKA3 getting message "Do not create line IDs of 'Settlement' cat. when defining assignmnt rules". can any one guid me to come out from this issue.
Regards,
Ram

Hi Ram,
I am sorry, but as I wrote this might be not just the technical issue when you can simply change from category A to category N. In OKG4 you classify the line ID to one of the SAP predefined categories, while in OKG5 you define the sourse for the line ID. Both settings require understanding of business requirements and knowledge of many other things, not just Result Analysis, but also cost element coding rules, etc. Try to get in touch with functional guys who are the design owners.
Paulo

Where can i define a rule for copying ATP results to purchasing?

Hello Gurus,
Where can i define a rule for copying ATP results to purchasing? i read from http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/543835bc0f357ee10000000a11466f/content.htm that we can define this rule.
Thanks

Hello,
i defined that part before, what i would like to define is below:
Thanks
●     Rule for availability check
Define a rule for copying ATP results to purchasing.
This rule controls how the system behaves in material shortage situations, and how the delivery proposal (confirmation proposal) is displayed.
<b>You can control the following factors in Customizing:</b>
○     Display of results
You define how the system copies results of the availability check to the stock transfer document. In other words, you define how the delivery proposal is displayed in the delivery schedule line view.
You can choose between the following rules:
■      One-time delivery (rescheduling: delivery proposal) <blank>
This setting corresponds to the system behavior up to and including SAP ERP Central Component, Release 5.0.
■      One-time delivery A
■      Complete delivery B
■      Delivery proposal C
■      Selection window for material shortage (batch: one-time delivery) D
■      Selection window for material shortage (batch: delivery proposal) E
■      Selection window for material shortage (batch: complete delivery) U

Office PDF Print and office PDF creator(adobe plugin) create different line thickness result

Hi together,
Office PDF Print and office abobe PDF creator(adobe plugin) create different result. It seems that Adobe PDf creater improves line thickness to 1pt instead of 0,3pt. Is there a setting to change to original 0,3 because this 0,3 are standard line thickness for our documents. with adobe V9 the line was 0,3pt. (we need thin, mid and thick lines)
After 2 day's google searching this is the last change for hope :-)
Software Versions
Windows 7
MS Office 2007 (12.0.6668.5000) SP3 MSO (12.0.6662.5000)
Adobe Acrobat X (10.1.7)
Left: MSO Adobe Plugin / MId: MS Word / Rigth: PDF printed over "print" AdobePDF printer

Hi Bill,
Thanks a lot for the fast reply, i have tested it with 300dpi but I didn't get a different result. The bad thing is that not all lines getting thicker. if there is no arrow or ball at the end of the line the line thickness will not change (see Pic). I think this is a Acrobat error, i don't think that this will improve the pdf quality if the progam changes only some lanes and not all to 1pt.
I Think we must downgrade to version 9.

Stop creating multiple points when making a line

Hello, new to this and for some reason when I go to create a line or shape it keeps creating multiple end points like a fan for example when using the line, or multiple boxes from the same start point etc...any help? Can't seem to find any content on this.

That was it exactly, huge thanks to you!

How do I remove the Stroke lines when I'm creating a blog section?

How do I remove those stupid Stroke lines when I'm creating a blog section?
I would show you but i cant post pics here.
http://www.greenpointcity.com

See my javascript widget here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8573276&#8573276

GP task is not going to UWL when defining the substitution rule

Hi experts,
I have defined substitution rule for user in UWL, all task is going to assigned user's UWL
but GP task is not going .
How to solve this ??
Regards,
Piyush

Add a dummy execute sql task as first step inside loop and add a breakpoint to that for OnPreExecute event and check value of variable during each iteration to see if it gets value of each child package witin folder correctly.
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

Product costing error while defining posting rules

Hi Friends,
When I'm trying to define posting rules for settling WIP using OKG8,
I get an error msg "GL account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element" and the aforesaid account is WIP (P&L account).
The long text of the error msg is as follows:
G/L account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element
Message no. KQ119
Diagnosis
When maintaining the posting rules for passing on results analysis data to Financial Accounting, you entered a G/L account that is defined as a primary cost element in cost and revenue element accounting. This is not allowed. You must enter a G/L account in the posting rules that is not defined as a cost element.
System Response
The entry invalid.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Enter a G/L account for which no cost element is specified in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
You can change the message type with user-defined error management (transaction OPR4_KKA). What should be observed when you enter a G/L account in a posting rule that is defined as a primary cost element in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting? You need to define a CO account assignment so that the posting defined in the posting rule can be executed. You do this with transaction OKB9 (default account assignment) or OKC9 (substitution), or using the default account assignment in the cost element master.
Could anyone suggest me on this.
The steps that I've already defined as far as the account are concerned:
1. Have defined the aforesaid account as a cost element
2. Assigned Prodn. C CTR in OKB9 agnst the same.
But then I dont understand why the system pops up this msg, saying, cannot be created as a cost element, wherein the account is already a cost element.
Plz suggest
regards
sandhya

Hiya,
WIP accounts (neither Inventory nor Offset) should NEVER be created as Cost Elements.
In most manufacturing scenarios, costs are tracked on the P&L. During period-end, since there is the risk of writing off some issues to the Production/Process/Sales Order, SAP has introduced the complex but ingenious system called Results Analysis that moves the balance of all open Orders to the Balance Sheet.
If the Order balance is (+)ve, the P&L is credited and the Balance Sheet is debited and vice versa. When you display the Order costs at period-end, the WIP costs are not considered. In order to calculate WIP, we have separate RA GL accounts that track costs independently of the Orders. Therefore, these are never created as Cost Elements. Creating these as Cost Elements would force the system to inadvertently post the WIP costs back on the Order (alongwith posting these to the B/S??? - an unimaginable situation).
At period-end, you have postings like:
Dr WIP Inventory Account
Cr WIP Offset Account
and, this is reversed at settlement:
Cr WIP Offset Account
Dr WIP Inventory Account
Along with this, the system calculates the Actual COS for the finished product. Neither of the two WIP accounts used above is created as a Cost Element. If you have created any of these as Cost Elements, the system will not allow you to save OKG8. Delete the Cost Element and then try saving the posting rule.
(PS: The "Cost Element" field in this screen has a different use. It is used to specify if a Secondary Cost Element from the RA Update table should be posted to a G/L Account. This is not meant for Primary Cost Elements. I think these Secondary CEs are of type 31 (requires confirmation - no SAP access right now). As you may have guessed, you can only enter either the RA Category or this Secondary CE).
You may also delete the OKB9 assignment to the Cost Centre. It is redundant.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

What's the data type when defining a KF to show an integer with a sign?

We want show some days difference which should be an integer with either a positive or negative sign. I used to design a KF with type of Number with "DEC - Counter or amount field with comma and sign" as the Data Type, but find it shows 25.000 if the day difference is 25 days. We want to show it as 25 other than 25.000. Then what type would we pick when defining the KF? Use Integer as the type? But we also want it to show the sign symbol.
The type field is dimmed as long as the InfoObj. is activated that I have to remove this field. I've delete all the data loaded in ODS, PSA and etc., and I have successfully remove this KF from InfoSource, but when I try to remove it from the ODS, always get the msg "Can't move/delete locked InfoObjects" even if the InfoObject is not locked (I've tried SM12 to delete all locked entries and also tried relog on, but not helpful). If someone gives any idea, I would be very appreciated on how to remove this KF from ODS and also let me what type should I use when creating a new KF which only shows integer with a sign!
Thanks

hey Siggi,
Now after I right click the ODS and select "Delete Data", the KF eventually gets removed from the ODS without any error, then I continue to delete this InfoObj.
However, when I run the InfoPackage to load data to the ODS, get a msg (see below in between two dashed lines):
Syntax error in GP_ERR_RSDRO_UPDATE, row 1,210 (-> long text)
Message no. RG102
Diagnosis
The data object "I_S_OLDDATA" does not have a component called "/BIC/Z_field".
Where Z_field is the InfoObject we deleted. With this error, that's even worse since that stops any data coming in! How to get rid of this error that we can continue to load data?
Thanks

Create multiple line item from one line item in BizTalk mapping

Hi,
In one of our new requirement we need to create 3 line items for every line item we are receiving with same value but in the below format.
Sample Input:
<EmpId>1234</EmpId><Name>ABCD></Name><Dept>YYY</Dept><Year>2014</Year><Desc1>D1</Desc1><Desc2>D2</Desc2><Desc3>D3</Desc3><Valid>Yes</Valid>
Sample Output in Flatfile:
1234,ABCD,,,D1,Yes
1234,ABCD,YYY,,D2,Yes
1234,ABCD,YYY,2014,D3,Yes
Can you Pls help me in creating the mapping in above format.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Elango
Chennai.
Mark As Answer or Vote As Helpful if My Reply Does.

Elango,
Before I explain about the solution, make sure when you give inputs/requirement in forums for us to help you, pay attention.
The input instance you have shown
Doesn’t have a root element
Has a typo - <Name>ABCD></Name> -Element has invalid “>” character.
This makes us to spend more time in cleansing your input and then find out solution.
We are here to help you, so help us to help you better.
Anyway, coming to the solution
You have to create map with a structure similar to the below shown image:
Here destination schema is a flat file schema with comma-delimited fields.
If you look into the destination schema, it look similar to your input schema, but there is just one “Desc” field instead of “Desc1”, “Desc2”, “Desc3” in your source schema. In destination, the
record has to repeat with same values for rest of the fields. And for “Desc” in destination schema will have corresponding index value of “Desc1” or “Desc2” or “Desc3” from source. i.e. first node of destination will have value of “Desc1” from source to “Desc”
field in destination, second node of destination will have value of “Desc2” from source to “Desc” field in destination and third node of destination will have value of “Desc3” from source to “Desc” field in destination.
I use XSLT in the map, with recursive template which will repeat for 3 times. I have given comment in the XSLT for your benefit.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:msxsl="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xslt" xmlns:var="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/var" exclude-result-prefixes="msxsl var" version="1.0">
<xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" method="xml" version="1.0" />
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates select="/Root" />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="/Root">
<Record>

<xsl:call-template name="LintItemTemp">
<xsl:with-param name="i">1</xsl:with-param>
<xsl:with-param name="count">3</xsl:with-param>
</xsl:call-template>
</Record>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="LintItemTemp">
<xsl:param name="i" />
<xsl:param name="count" />
<Details>
<EmpId>
<xsl:value-of select="EmpId/text()" />
</EmpId>
<Name>
<xsl:value-of select="Name/text()" />
</Name>
<Dept>
<xsl:value-of select="Dept/text()" />
</Dept>
<Year>
<xsl:value-of select="Year/text()" />
</Year>

<xsl:if test ="($i =1)">
<Desc>
<xsl:value-of select="Desc1/text()" />
</Desc>
</xsl:if>

<xsl:if test ="($i =2)">
<Desc>
<xsl:value-of select="Desc2/text()" />
</Desc>
</xsl:if>

<xsl:if test ="($i =3)">
<Desc>
<xsl:value-of select="Desc3/text()" />
</Desc>
</xsl:if>
<Valid>
<xsl:value-of select="Valid/text()" />
</Valid>
<xsl:value-of select="./text()" />
</Details>

<xsl:if test="$i < $count">
<xsl:call-template name="LintItemTemp">
<xsl:with-param name="i">
<xsl:value-of select="$i + 1"/>
</xsl:with-param>
<xsl:with-param name="count">
<xsl:value-of select="$count"/>
</xsl:with-param>
</xsl:call-template>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
So the input and output will look like the below:
You can change the schema/XSLT and its corresponding namespaces as you want.
When the above shown output is send to a custom-pipeline with flat file assembler in send port will output the above shown output to the flat-file structure as you wanted. Again, I repeat you
to use flat-file file schema with comma-delimited fields as the destination schema in the above shown map for you to get the flat-file output as you needed.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Converting contract to sales order does not auto create schedule lines

Hi
When I convert quotation to sales order, then schedule lines get auto created.
But when I convert contract to sales order, then schedule lines don't be auto created. Instead, a confirmation screen for proposal delivery date pops up for every line item in the sales order.
Is there any suggestion how can I solve my problem ?
Thanks..

Hi,
In standard SD module, system checks availability for each line item, gives you popup screen of confirmation.
If you don't want availability or popuscreen of confirmation,then
Go to VOV6 >>> Select schedule line which you are using in sales order for line item >>> Remove tick mark of availability check.
Else
Remove availability check rule from material master >>> Under tab Sales : ganral/plant
kapil

Create "result line" when defining scrambling rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for