Creation of invoice issue for a specific supplier

When the user is trying to create an invoice for a supplier, he is able to query the supplier name, the site. But when arriving at the invoice date the system will not allow him to move.
There are no error messages.
Grateful if anyone can pinpoint me to a solution or to a workaround.
Workaround- (Disable this supplier and create a new one. However will it have any impact if there are unpaid invoices for the supplier etc)
Thanks

I hope you have already verified whether that supplier is in active or inactive status.
You can create a new supplier & you can use supplier merge feature to merge existing supplier to new supplier.

Similar Messages

JSF Table StyleClass issue for a specific Field inside the Table

Hi There,
Am having an issue of dynamically setting the styleClass for a specific field inside a DataTable. Here is how the JSF code is ..
<h:column>
<h:panelGrid id="column4" columns="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<h:inputText id="numberOfApps" value="#{row.submitNumber}" styleClass="#{row.customStyleClass}" maxlength="6" converter="MyNumberConverter" />
</h:panelGrid>
</h:column>
This Table has a specific column which has a input Text Box where user enter's data. This data will be validated in the bean where in after the validation if its exceeding a limit we should throw an error message and also highlight the field with a specific styleClass.
I am setting the StyleClass dynamically based on the User Input, so that I can display a highlited Error Field on the screen. Strangely enough, styleclass is getting set as expected for the first submit but doesnt show any styles for further submits. Even the existing style is getting removed from the second submit onwards. I am setting this "customStleClass" dynamic parameter as a Bean Property. Am sure these values are properly set coz to make sure I have put an h:output tag inside that table to display the customStyleClass values and they are getting set as expected but I see blank value for the class="" in the source of the Page.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Edited by: Lalith on Jan 14, 2008 10:23 AM

One option is you find the data element of that field GUID.
Now go to SE11 transaction and in data type put that data element and press where used list. In that select tables.
This will give you a list of tables where that field is used.
But again if there are lots of them it will be difficult to find.
The only option in that case is debug the extractor and find out.

Print preview invoice issue for a parcular invoice in vf03

Hi,
I am facing an issue with the print preview invoice. I have 2 billing document nos., for billing document 3117101008 when I go to "Billing Document"->"Issue to output"-> and click on "print preview" I get an output, but for the other billing document 3117101007 when I click on "Print preview" nothing happens, it just keeps on loading and everything gets hanged.
Do I need to do any modifications in my custom include "YV0023INV_PRINT_F01" or is there anything linked with the header details table 'IT_HU_HEAD'.
Please advise, appreciate your efforts.
Thanks

Hello Bawneet,
Are you facing this issue only to this billing document ?
Did you check the same for 1008 billing document ? First try to open 1007 and then next open 1008 document, here please check are you facing the same issue like screen keeps on loading issue.
Please check this and come back with your issues.
Thanks & Regards,
Lakshmi S

Invoice issue for Multiple Account assigned PO

Hello
We are facing an issue with a Serive PO which has account assigned to cost centre (K).8 costcentres are assigned .
While booking invoice on one particular date the invoice amount got distributed among all the 8 cost centres but on some other day when invoice was booked it was allocated to only the first costcentre.
can somebody help me with the logic how the invoice gets distributed and what could be the reason the invoice amount is not distributed among all the costcentres and only one.
Regards
Sarika

Hi Sarika,
please have a look at the following notes:
568541     MIRO: Default values with multiple account assignme
457740     MIRO/MR1M: Default values, amts for multiple accou
395043     FAQ: Posting invoices using Transaction MIRO
428157 MIRO: percentage multiple accnt assgnt f. service-based IV
Please also check the customize settings to in Tr:OME9, under 'partial
invoice' what is the settings to the cost center.
Also note in MIRO, system distribute the corresponding GR quantity into
acc.assignment's items proportionately based on the indicator 'Partial
invoice' and the data 'Distribution percentage'(VPROZ) in the screening
'acc.assignment' within the PO/item.
You can change the "Partial invoice' in the screening 'acc.assignment"
as '1' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities one after another)
instead of using 2 "Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities
proportionately".
Please check also include LMRMKF02.
Regards,
Edit
Regards,
Edit

Excise invoice issue for non stock orders

Hi,
We are unable to create excise invoice for non stock materials. When we try to create excise invoice with refernce to the billing document, the following error appears (message no 81681: reference document of 2917 is not delivery document). This process was working properly before updating patches, but after the updation, we are not able to generate excise invoice for non stock materials. (FYI: In the case of non stock order we are using order related billing). Any solution to resolve this error??
regards
John
Edited by: Gino12 on Oct 28, 2010 10:00 AM

For sales with material type NLAG, Item category TAX and schedule line category CX contain the standard settings along with copy control settings (VTFL, item level requirement 004) that suit your case.

Material group Issue for Maintain specific EBP Purchasing org

Hi Grus
Can any one help me on this issue, is it possible to maintain some specific material group to one EBP purchasing org.
your answerer will be rewarded.
Thanks & Regards
Sada

Teja Provided some usfull document.
Thanks Teja
Sada

MIRO - Invoice Output types (MR90) Routines Based on Specific Suppliers

Hi All,
Requirement is to trigger Invoice outputs for a specific set of suppliers, while doing invoice verification in MIRO and the same need to be processed in MR90 for the output.
Is there a routine which triggers a invoice output ( type REKL) only for specfic set of suppliers, for e,g if the suppliers are all ERS suppliers then it should trigger "REKl" else not?
I am aware we have a routine 181 which can be modified but wanted to know from experts if this kind of requirements has a standard solution.
Will appreciate any help regarding this.
Note :Standard settings and customization have been done and triggering output is not an issue so please address the specific requiremennts.
Regards
Swagat Panda

Would like to know more on how your are cancelling ERS invoices already settled? as i am not able to cancel them in MR8M is there any other ways around it?
Also, Sub Cr we are using not for back dated price changes but since we are a service company we don't have concepts of MAP prices for the materials all are account assigned materials and get expensed and revaluation will just act as a statistical entry as there won't be stock at any point of time.
The invoice reduction we are not using as these are all ERS invoices and if there is any amount to be debited to the supplier we come to know after a settlement run (MRRL) is over and we see a "visual" quality defect at a later point of time as i mentioned earlier we don't have stock.
So this is one of the reason why we are debited the supplier at a later stage using Sub Cr and for this the vendor has to be sent a "notification" that we are going to debit him for a delivery ( account assigned ).
But your suggestions were helpful in setting up business rules.
Please be in touch.
Regards
Swagat Panda

Issue at the time of creation of transfer order for inbound delivery

Hello,
I am facing one issue at the time of creation of transfer order for inbound delivery.
If I create inbound delivery for purchase order with account assignment as 'M' (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO), inbound delivery is not updated. Also document flow for inbounde delivery s not updated. I can create N number of transfer orders for on inbound delivery. Need help to resolve issue.
If I create inbound delivery for purchase order with account assignment other than 'M' (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO), inbound delivery and document flow is updated.
Thanks and Regards,
Nikhil

Hi
In OMS2 t-code
for your material type and plant ,you have to mark value based and qunaity based updation mark
Regards
kailas Ugale

There is invoice workflow approval running and i want to exclude from it specific supplier

hi ,
please i am having some invoices from external system imported into oracle through interface , i want to import this invoices as approved or exclude it from the ap invoices approval workflow
will someone help me how this could be done ??
thanks

If it is a imported invoice, you can define the custom attribute based on source or specific vendor or both.
Below steps for approval not required for specific vendor
Please follow the below steps
1) Define custom attribute
Data type: Number
Usage Type: Dynamic
Value:
select vendor_id from ap_invoices_all where invoice_id = :transactionId
2) Define condition by using the above attribute, here give your vendor id (where approval is not required)
3) Define production rule & attach the above condition & ensure to select the following action type "NO INVOICE APPROVAL REQUIRED/INVOICE MATCHED"
4) initiate invoice approval for one invoice, the status of that invoice should be "Not Required"
Please update the test results once you are done.

EDI issue for PO creation

Hi,
I did configuration to trigger and IDOC via EDI when the PO was created and when it was changed. But it is not creating an IDOC while creating PO; generating error message " Purchasing order xxxxxx123 does not exist"; but when i repeat the output in ME22/ME22N for same PO, it is working fine.
I checked partner profile and everything looks fine. It's not working only for PO creation, it is working for PO change.
Can someone provide your suggestion to resolve this?
Environment: ECC 6.0
Recently we had support stack upgrade in our system.
Thanks,
Amal

Check is there any runtime error?
Regards
Praveen

AD DNS resolution Issue for specific Site

Hello Experts,
Currently I am facing issue for DNS Resolution.
I have 2 Sites
Site A(2003 R2 DC) & Site B(2008 R2 ADC)
my domain name is abc.co.in
and I have another forwardlookup zone abcl.com (mail.abcl.com/Dev.abcl.com)
I am able to resolve host recoreds for abc.co.in & abcl.com from site A
I am facing issue for Site B
unable to resolve A records for mail.abcl.com
when I am trying to resolve using
============================================================
nslookup mail.abcl.com 192.168.0.5 (Site B ADC)
getting below output
Server : adc01siteB.abc.co.in
Address : 192.168.0.5
Non autoritative answer :
Name : com.co.in
address : 192.254.185.209
Aliases : mail.abcl.com.co.in
==============================================================
mail.abcl.com - 192.168.0.11 (Actual Internal A record)
I want to know why this trying to resolve from external DNS (192.254.185.209)
your help / pointers will be appreciable
R Udeg

Is your settings for site B the same for site A in the DNS Server properties?
Did you make sure that UDP and TCP port 53 is open both ways?
Did you make sure all resource records have been updated?
Did you flush the cache/ scavenging happened?
Did you check the DNS forwaders and recursion?
Remember if a DNS server fails to resolve a name for which it is not authoritative, the cause is usually a failed recursive query. Recursive queries are used frequently by DNS servers to resolve remote names that are delegated to other DNS zones and servers.
Note: If you disable recursion on the DNS server, you will not be able to use forwarders on the same server.

Excise invoice does not exist in supplying plant

Dear all,
We are having a scenario where in we are doing stock transfer from one plant to other the system gives an error message that the excise invoice does not exist in supplying plant.
Created a PO for stock transfer, posted GI against it, created excise invoice in J1IS with transaction type other. We are having separate excise registeration for the two plants.
Secondly request to kinldy let me know what account enteries should be generated when we post excise invoice for the supplying plant.
Regards,
mahesh.

Hi,
In case of STO process using SD the process flow is like
1. Create a PR against the supplying Plant (ME51N)
2. Create a STO (PO) with ref to the PR (ME21N)
3. Create a Outbound Delivery with ref to the STO. (VL10B/VL10D)
4. Create a Proforma Inv (VF01) No Acc docs gets generated.
5. Create a Excise Inv for the supplying Plant (J1IIN) Accounting Doc gets Generated.
The Accounting Entries at the time of Excise Inv creation for the supplying Plant is:
Excise Duty Expenses on Sale                               Dr
Excise Duty Payable                                    Cr
Sec.& Higher Edu Cess Payable on Excise               Cr
Edu .Cess Payable on Excise                    Cr
At the time of Goods Receipt at plant
1.Good Receipt at Receiving Plant (MIGO) - No Accounting docs get generated only Qty update takesplace.
2. Capture & post the excise @ the Receiving Plant during MIGO by entering the Supplying Plant excise inv as reference.
Hope it is Clear.
Revert incase of any queries.
Regards,

Problem in invoice printout for second line item of the contract.

Hi,
There are two line items in the contract. Both with different material and different plants. 1st line item with plant japan, and 2nd line item with plant singapore. But, when i try to take printout for 2nd line item after invoicing it, the address appearing in printout is of Japan instead of singapore.
Any idea why this happening?
Please revert back asap.

Hi Chetan,
If that is a header output, then there are issues at the design level itself. You have an output as header output and you expect the item level details to be printed in two different printouts.How is this handled in the program. Mostly header outputs are used to print the details abotu all the items in the doucment , not for a specific item. If you want to print a specific item only , then it is always advisable to configure the output as item output.
Leaving that aside, the problem lies in the code. You may be selecting the item number when you are printing the details of the second item, but for printing address, you are not coding using the item number.
To prove this test this scenario.
Create an order with first item belonging to Singapore plant and second item Japan plant.
Now create the otuput for item1----it will work fine
Do the same for item2-----Now, the plant address will be of Singapore, while the material belongs to Japan.
If this happens, it can be safely assumed that problem lies in the code. Do this test and then if the problem is in the program, discuss with your developer, he will rectify the bug for you.
You can reward me if this solves your problem.

SD Billing - Avoid Cancellation Creation if Invoice has not been posted yet

Dear all,
I have noticed this problem in my company system.
Problem descripion:
- you creates an invoice and the system doesn't post it for any reason
- then you create the cancel of the invoice, BEFORE forcing the posting of the invoice
--> user creates Cancel, Cancel is not posted as well.
--> from now it is impossible to post both invoices: if you try to post the Invoice after the cancel creation, the VF02 recongnise that a CANCEL exists and do not allow for the posting
--> standard VFX3 doesn't signal this kind of not posted documents situation.
Ok, The right procedure for thes user should be: create invoice, if not posted then try to understand why not posted, and not CANCEL it.
But in this case VFK3 was not able to detect the invoice was not posted: it was not in the list.
So the 2 ways must be:
1) one possibility could be undestand in VFX3 could be enhanced: I checked in OSS but I didn't find anything.
2) other possibility: add a further check in interface between SD and FI in order to check if original invoice is not posted to FI and in this case block the cancel creation, as instead standard SAP does.
Could you please give me an idea on how it would be better proceed?
Thank You very much.
Raffaella

Dear,
thank you for your feedback.
in VOFA the flag is not ticked.
The problem was that In VFX3 no data were found for the specified document (with all "Inclomplete Due To" check box flagged), even if invoice and relative cancel were already created, but not posted.
When we tryied to to post them, via VF02 for example, the system didn't warned anything specific and, doing the posting via debug, we discovered that the posting was stopped because VBRK-RFBSK = E = "Billing Document Cancelled".
So, forcing via debug that value = ' ', because of the urgency of Finance Office, we could invoice it and then do the same for its cancel.
So at the moment it is not possible for me to reproduce the error in the system.
The only workaround I can imagine, is to find a way to avoid cancel creation if invoice is not posted yet.
Do you think this is feasible way?
Thank You veyr much for your suggestions.
KR
Raffaella
Edited by: Raffaella Sacchetto on Nov 29, 2010 3:43 PM

Using Async to wait for a specific event

I've simplified the creation and deletion calls and used a generic item. In my before method, I call Async.handleEvent to wait for PropertyChangeEvents, but this only waits for the first one. My problem lies in the fact that ItemManager is an IEventDispatcher that sends multiple property change events, but I need to wait for the specific event with the property "item". However, when I call Async inside the handler, it does not keep the Test method from running, Before assumes that it's Async responsibilities have been fulfilled and launches the next stage of tests. How can I keep Before from moving on until an event with a specific property has been received?
public class Test
        private static const TIME_OUT:int = 3000;
        [Before(async)]
        public function runBeforeEveryTest() : void
            // Create a new item
            item.create(); // This is an asynchronous creation that sends many Property Change events
            //Wait for the item to be created before continuing tests.
            Async.handleEvent( this, ItemManager.instance, PropertyChangeEvent.PROPERTY_CHANGE, handlePropertyChangeForItem, TIME_OUT);
        [After]
        public function runAfterEveryTest() : void
            // Delete the Item
            item.delete();
        [Test(async)]
        public function itemExists() : void
                  Assert.assertTrue( item.exists() );
       private function handlePropertyChangeForItem(evt:PropertyChangeEvent, eventObject:Object) : void
             if (evt.property == "item")
                 // Now that the item has been created, we can start the tests.
                 return;
             else
                 // Keep waiting.
                 Async.handleEvent( this, ItemManager.instance, PropertyChangeEvent.PROPERTY_CHANGE, handlePropertyChangeForItem, TIME_OUT);
Thanks in advance, it's greatly appreciated!

I can't reproduce this issue. All seems to be working fine with multiple deferred Async calls. I am pasting my code in. Since I did not have your manager, I tried to repiicate this with a timer. If you could look at my code and see if it differs from yours in a significant way, I can take another shot, but it seems to be working as expected.
package
import flash.events.TimerEvent;
import flash.utils.Timer;
import mx.events.PropertyChangeEvent;
import org.flexunit.Assert;
import org.flexunit.async.Async;
public class NestedAsync {
private static const TIME_OUT:int = 3000;
private var timer:Timer;
Before(async)]
public function runBeforeEveryTest() : void { timer =
new Timer( 1000, 5 );
Async.handleEvent(this, timer, TimerEvent.TIMER, handleTimerTick, TIME_OUT);timer.start();}
[After]
public function runAfterEveryTest() : void { timer.stop();
timer =
null;}
Test(async)]
public function itemExists() : void {Assert.assertTrue(
true );}
private function handleTimerTick(evt:TimerEvent, eventObject:Object) : void {
if ( timer.currentCount == 5 ) {
    // Now that the item has been created, we can start the tests.
    return; }
else {
    // Keep waiting.    Async.handleEvent(
this, timer, TimerEvent.TIMER, handlePropertyChangeForItem, TIME_OUT);
suite.cases {

Creation of invoice issue for a specific supplier

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for