Credit data inconsistency

Dear Experts !
Please help me in the below credit management scenario.
User observed some inconsistent data in transaction -VKM1 with respect to the FD33 screen . I checked the data in RVKRED88 report and found that open order value of the sales order-XXX was much lesser than the credit value of the same sales order in VKM1 transaction.
Could you please tell me whether the open order value in the report RVKRED88 is correct or that shows in VKM1 is correct and how to rectify this data inconsistency.
Thanks in advance !
Sandeep

Dear Sandeep,
There are two programmes to correct the Credit data inconsistency
First use the Program RVKRED77. the you can use the second Program RVKRED88. in SE38 transaction enter the programme then click on execute or press F8
There system will ask you to maintain the selecction criteria.
RVKRED77
Credit account
Credit control area
RVKRED88
Credit account
Credit control area
Document number
Best Regards,
Mh

Similar Messages

  • Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type (FAA_POST047)

    Hi colleagues!
    I have the following error:
    Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type
    Message no. FAA_POST047
    Diagnosis
    You are trying to post in company code 1000 with transaction type 130 in ledger group 0N. According to table TABWA, this transaction type is limited. Nonetheless, according to your entries, you want to post to area 11.
    System Response
    Using limited transaction types is obsolete and would lead to an inconsistent posting in this situation. The system rejects the posting.
    Procedure
    Use a transaction type that is not limited. And, if possible, choose the ledger group and/or depreciation area on the initial screen.
    According to specific accounting we shouldn't post to one of the depr. area, so most of the tr.types are restricted to post to all areas except this one.
    Because of this, posting from MM with acc.assignment 'A' is impossible - I have this error.
    Any ideas how to solve?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Anton
    This looks like your transaction type -130 is limited to post only in ledger group-0N as per the transaction type configuration. Due to which system is unable to post all the ledgers and hence this lead to inconsistency.
    Please verify the transaction type 130- in configuration T code - OAYA and see if it is restricted by depreciation area (eventually allow to post only ledger group- 0N.
    Tcode - OAYA (Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas)
    please verify and let us know the update. hope this helps
    Best Regards
    Jomon

  • How to fix calendar date inconsistency

    Hello,
    I have a problem with closing material period due to inconsistency with actual calendar date. Last closed period in material master of specific cc is 07.2009.(It is test system with IDES database). How to close remaining periods to 01.2012. I can not do it in mmpv.
    Regards
    Sylvester
    Moderator messaage: I cant see any proof for the calendar date inconsistency that you mentioned in the subject.
    It is the same question about month end closing which was answered many hundred times in this forum.,
    Please search the forum before asking the same questions again. Read the forum rules before posting.
    thread locked.
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Jan 19, 2012 10:42 PM

    Hi, If it is IDES follow below step, but never try this in Production system,
    First check in OX06 & OBY6, "Fiscal Year Variant" is maintained as K4,
    Then Use T-code OX18, delete all the assignments of your company code & plant,
    Now use T-code OMSY enter the year & period (2012 & 01)
    Noe again Use T-code OX18, and again do the assignments of the company codes & all plants

  • Reorganization of Credit data :

    Dear SAP Experts ,
    We have changed the Risk categories of some of the CUstomers . Now I have run the reorganization of the Credit Data.
    We have the following Message the NEw Credit Limit was created.
    Where can I view that what was changed and of which CUstomers.
    regards,
    A S

    Dear Gurunadh Kollipara,
    I have recreated the FI and SD data for the reorganization.
    Now in the FCV3 Report I can see there is double entry in the of all the Customers.
    The Payer Column there is one entry X and the other is Blank for each Customer.
    *The following is the help documents of the P( Payer:)
    FI checks only against current payer
    Indicates that credit checks against open items, oldest open item, and the highest dunning level are carried out using the open items and the dunning level of only the current payer (and not with data from all payers who are assigned to the credit customer).
    Note
    This is only the case if the payer is copied into the document on the basis of the partner determination procedure.*
    Why there is dual entry the report for all Customers.
    Please explain.
    Edited by: SAP Consultant on Dec 9, 2008 12:02 PM
    Edited by: SAP Consultant on Dec 9, 2008 12:23 PM

  • Tables for Credit data

    Hi all,
    please tell me the tables  for Credit data.
    Thanks,
    kishore.

    1) Check to see if there are any entries in table S066 and S067. These SIS tables hold the credit data for sales order value and delivery order value.
    hope it helps

  • IDOC data inconsistency

    Hi experts,
    i have an issue that there is  data inconsistency in IDOC( delivery address created with respect to PLANT instead of STORAGE LOCATION).
    now i want to rectify the issue by checking the mapping in the program , the IDOC is created by standard procude ( thorough ME21N).
    can anybody tell me how can i find the program/interface name where the logic is written for filed mapping for IDOC
    IDOC type ORDERS05
    Message type ORDERS
    Thanks
    Niru

    Hi ,
    I have put a breakpoint inside the FM IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDERS and try to reprocess the idoc from WE19, but the control not stoped at Break point .
    assume below is validation inside the FM makng the issue.
    IF pekko-werks NE space AND
          pekko-kunnr EQ space AND
          pekko-emlif EQ space AND
          pekko-adrn2 EQ space AND
          pekko-adrnr EQ space.
         CLEAR int_edidd.
         CLEAR e1edka1.
         int_edidd-segnam = 'E1EDKA1'.
         e1edka1-parvw = 'WE'.
    *- if Third party order, send customer number of first S.O. item -----*
         PERFORM fill_kunnr_header.
         e1edka1-lifnr = pekko-werks.
         lv_prog = 'SAPLEINM'.
         PERFORM fill_e1edka1_we_gln IN PROGRAM (lv_prog) IF FOUND.
         PERFORM edka1_fuellen.
    * Call Method PROCESS_IDOC_SEGMENT (BADI MM_EDI_ORDERS_OUT)
         PERFORM badi_process_idoc_segment.
    * Call Customer Function 002 (enhancement MM06E001)
         PERFORM customer_function.
    *   Außenhandelsdaten
    *   Partnerzusatz für IMPINV01 ab Release 4.0A z.B. Zoll-ID-Nummer
         IF control_record_out-idoctp(6) EQ 'IMPINV'.
           PERFORM fill_e1edkaz.
         ENDIF.
       ENDIF.
    *- Manuelle Anlieferungsanschrift, wenn in allen Positionen gleich ----
       IF pekko-adrnr NE space AND
          pekko-kunnr EQ space.
         CLEAR int_edidd.
         CLEAR e1edka1.
         int_edidd-segnam = 'E1EDKA1'.
    can you please tell me how can control stoped at this code?
    regards
    niru

  • Migration CC and FF data from Virsa 4.0 to GRC 10.1 Data Inconsistency

    Hello Guru's
    We have done Migration from VIRSA 4.0 Compliance Calibrator (CC) and Firefighter (FF) data from  to GRCAC 10.1 system.
    After Migration, data inconsistency is coming while validation.
    Followed standard sap migration guide virsa 4.0 to 10.0
    Patch level  - GRC AC 10.1 system
    SAP_BASIS
    740
    0008
    SAPKB74008
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP Basis Component
    SAP_ABA
    740
    0008
    SAPKA74008
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    Cross-Application Component
    SAP_GWFND
    740
    0008
    SAPK-74008INSAPGWFND
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP Gateway Foundation 7.40
    SAP_UI
    740
    0010
    SAPK-74010INSAPUI
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    User Interface Technology 7.40
    PI_BASIS
    740
    0008
    SAPK-74008INPIBASIS
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    Basis Plug-In
    ST-PI
    740
    0000
    0000
    SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
    SAP_BW
    740
    0008
    SAPKW74008
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP Business Warehouse
    GRCFND_A
    V1100
    0006
    SAPK-V1106INGRCFNDA
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    GRC Foundation ABAP
    GRCPINW
    V1100_731
    0006
    SAPK-11506INGRCPINW
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP GRC NetWeaver Plug-In
    IW_FNDGC
    100
    0002
    SAPK-10002INIWFNDGC
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP IW FNDGC 100
    WEBCUIF
    747
    0005
    SAPK-74705INWEBCUIF
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP Web UI Framework
    IW_CBS
    200
    0009
    SAPK-20009INIWCBS
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP IW CBS 200
    IW_CNT
    200
    0009
    SAPK-20009INIWCNT
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    SAP IW CNT 200
    IW_SCS
    200
    0009
    SAPK-20009INIWSCS
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    Screen Scraping
    POASBC
    100_731
    0001
    SAPK-10201INPOASBC
    0000
    @6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
    POA Shared Business Components
    Patch level VIRSA 4.0 system
    GRCPINW
    V1100_731
    0008
    SAPK-11508INGRCPINW
    SAP GRC NetWeaver Plug-In
    Kindly let us know after migration, any sap notes need to install.
    Regards,
    karunakar

    Hello Prasant,
    We have migrated VIRSA 4 0 to GRC 10.1 system, after migration we have below issues.
    1. In table GRACSODRISK (not able to see the medium risk, but in NWBC screen (Access Risks) we are seeing the medium risks.
    2. In Function Permission.txt file ( only AND is coming for all, but some OR is avaiable in VIRSA 4 0 system.
    And for gap (it automatically taken AND
    Example:
    AM02
    FB02
    F_BKPF_BED
    ACTVT
    2
    AND
    0
    AM02
    FB02
    F_BKPF_BED
    ACTVT
    3
    AND
    1
    AM02
    FB02
    F_BKPF_BED
    BRGRU
    AND
    1
    AM02
    FB02
    F_BKPF_BEK
    ACTVT
    2
    AND
    0
    AM02
    FB02
    F_BKPF_BEK
    ACTVT
    3
    AND
    1
    AM02
    FB02
    F_BKPF_BEK
    BRGRU
    AND
    1
    kindly suggest.
    Regards,
    Karunakar

  • Credit data Message no. V1677

    Hello experts,
    After entering VA32, I press enter. A message pops up below. Why such a message pops up? You know, I have not changed anything as I just press enter. If I change price / payment terms, any impact? Thanks.
    "Credit data will not be redetermined
    Message no. V1677
    Diagnosis
    Because the document has changed, new credit data, new payer data or another credit control area has been created.
    System Response
    The system will not create any new credit data."

    I believe, if there is a change in Credit Control Area, then system will pop up this message.  If not, have a look at the following notes:-
    Note 1587661 - External number assignment: Error message V1 677 displayed
    Note  432507 - Credit status is lost after the payer is changed
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Credit data in Biller direct

    Hi All,
      I am working on UCES Biller direct portal in which we have a CREDIT tab .
    Firstly,I want to know that is it referring to the credit data or the creditworthiness.(I suppose its credit data).
    Secondly, If it is credit , where can i actually see this credit data as it is not refecting in my portal. Even though i can see all other data related to payments through FPL9 and on the portal as well except this on portal.
    Is it something else that is missing from my side for the credit data to be seen on the portal?
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Richa Tyagi

    Hi still you are looking for answer? let me know

  • Recreation of Credit Data puts Delivery notes on hold

    Hi All,
    We run the standard SAP report RFDKLI20 any time we change a credit limit on a customer. This updates the backlog with the new Credit limit. It also updates the delivery notes which had already been approved to ship and are in process at the warehouse (eg: not yet goods issued). This program places the delivery notes back on referral to release again.
    The requirement is that the backlog update should not have any affect on existing /created delivery notes that have not yet been goods issued and shipped. Please provide me some pointers on how to achieve this.
    Regards,
    Praveen

    hi
       report which you have specified is f.28 transaction and while using this system recreates the credit data irrespective of open /approved/released /status of sales order/open delivery /open picked delivery/ docs.
    so if you want system not run thru all open del/open picked del docs,which are already released from credit check ,then for those credit controll area u should not assign the credit check rule B and C ,so that when u run the below report system doesnot behave like what u have mentioned.
    reward if helps !!!!!!

  • Exception message 62 - Master Data Inconsistant

    I'm getting the referenced exception message when generating an MRP run with scheduling value of "lead time scheduling and capacity planning".  I've done consistency checks on all master records - routings, work centers, etc - and all have come back clean.  Anyone have any idea why this may be happening?
    Thanks!
    Bob

    Hi,
        62 Scheduling: Master data inconsistent Check master data !
    Remove "In House Processing Time" from the Material Master MRP2
    view. Ensure that the Production Version & Routing are correct. Run
    MPS/MRP manually once corrected.
    Regards
    Sunil

  • ORDERS05 IDOC - ZTERM "Critical credit data changed" problem

    Hello everyone!
    I have configured a scenario where XI sends an IDOC (ORDERS.ORDERS05) to an SAP system to create a Sales Order (SO).
    I have a problem with the Payment Terms (...EDI_DC40/ZTERM) field. Whenever I send an SO with the ZTERM field mapped, I get an error "Critical credit data changed" and as a result, the SO is not created; however, when I leave the field blank, the message goes through successfully.
    Apparently, a popup saying "Critical credit data changed" shows even when creating SOs manually. My question is this, is there any way I can bypass this message through XI, so that I can create the SO with the ZTERM field populated? Are there any qualifiers I should be looking into?
    Looking forward to your responses!
    Warm regards,
    Glenn

    Hello Anil,
    Thank you very much for your reply! Unfortunately, that configuration is part of the auto credit checking. When I create SOs manually and change the payment terms field, a popup says "Critical credit data changed", I can simply tick the 'check' mark and the SO saves. However, if the SO is sent via XI, the popup causes an error. Is there any information we can provide in the IDOC so that it bypasses those kinds of popup messages?

  • Data inconsistency problem TABLES: VBUK/VBUP vs VBAK/VBAP

    Hi,
    I have the fun task of trying to solve a data inconsistency problem caused by a faulty network connection between R/3 and our SQL server.
    To add to the fun my knowledge of the outbound systems is pretty close to zero.
    Apparently our warehouse was booking stock and after booking they process the STO NO in VL10B.
    While posting the outbound in VL02n some of the lines did not generate.
    So they deleted the outbound and tried again.
    After they finished playing around and our connections acted funky, I now have data for the outbound in tables VBUP/VBUK (Outbound status tables), but seemingly nowhere else.
    There is no data in ekpo, lips, vbak or vbap.
    So the question is:
    How on earth do I get rid of these entries safely, or otherwise try to generate the missing data?
    Just changing the statuses to completed did not work as they end up having problems when trying to pick more stock on articles that had entries on the missing outbound.
    Any other ideas?
    What other tables do I need to check for entries?
    Thanks
    Charl
    Message was edited(typos) by:
            Charl Holtzhausen

    Hi,
    With the help of SAP we solved the problem.
    Apart from VBUP/VBUK there was data in table VBBE (stock movement).
    Deleting the entries in these cleared the problem.
    It was important to check that further STOs were not adversely affected, which it seems it was not.
    Regards

  • Data Inconsistency on MI Client

    Hi,
    I am using MI 7.0 SP13 Client. I have deployed MAU3.0 and I am facing major Data Inconsistency Issues.
    On Sync, it gives error - Problems during syncronization.
    On the middleware, in Merep_mon, with my intervention, some of the queues are in finished and some in ignore state and this is the deadlock I have achieved for now.
    I am thinking of following this link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/4c/7862a6642eab40ac7abf34e9048c93/frameset.htm
    Following this I want to achieve an initial download of the whole data set.
    This link talks about manually deleting the data files from the client and this is where I have some confusion.
    There are a lot many files in the data folder in root MI folder. Shall I delete everything in it? Or what exactly is to be deleted?
    And what happens if I choose - Refresh Replica Database - as suggested in that link without deleting any data from the client?
    (And will this be a good option, if I uninstall the application and reinstall it again and then Sync for the data - I think it should work but I dont want to follow this path for now)
    Ankur

    Hi Ankur,
    the initial question is: why do you have anything in ignore state?
    As long as you can sync and the sync does not give major exceptions, you can follow the path and delete the local dataset with the button on the settings screen. This will give you a complete new dataset from the middleware.
    If you get an exception with every sync you do, then you can either reinstall the device or delete the files. Well, try to delete the files and play a little with it, you get the feeling about the correct files soon. But as I said: as long as you can sync and just have data inconsistency between backend and lcient - you can reset the client persistence form the settings screen of MI. But again: why do you have this? It must be a major problem in ypur enhancements then, cause normal MAM does not have these issues in normal case!
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Oliver

  • UPDATION OF CUSTOMER CREDIT DATA IN CONTRACT

    Hi all
    We have a scenario where the payer is changed in the Sold to party and we can see the change done in contract(payer).
    But we observe that the Customer credit data does not change.It is still picking the old payer's
    credit data!
    Any one could help us in resolving this issue.
    Regards
    Srikanth

    Dear Freind,
    You have Changed the credit Data in FD32 or the Payer in Customer Master . for This I believe you need to Carry out Reorganization of FI & SD credit Data .
    Please run the report : F.28 and recreate the Credit Data .
    Hope your Problem Will be solved.
    regards,
    A S

Maybe you are looking for