Cross Company Charge

Hello All,
Does anyone know if standard SRM allows a user from one company code to create a shopping cart and charge it to another company code? Is this controlled through the org structure attributes or does it involve the use of BAdIs as well?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
SN

Hello
I did not get your question clearly.
Do you want to create SC for cross company codes? What is your business scenario.
For cross company purchasing, maintain multiple Compny codes with attribute BUK for the user in the org structure. Then in the SC you can select the company code you want.
Charging to different company codes is something not logical to any business.
You cannot select the CC from other company code as they are tied up to each other in FI and you will get an error.
Reward points if helpful.
Regards
Jagadish

Similar Messages

Configuring cross company charge

Happy new year to all!
I'd like to know if anyone has been successful at configuring EBP to allow an user to charge across multiple companies in one shopping cart. If so, could you please provide some info here on how to go about setting that up? Or where I could find further information on cross company charge?
Greatly appreciated,
SN

Hi,
Please assign the different company codes for user atribtes itself..then try to shop then definitely you must see differnet company codes if you go details tab...
Thanks
Ravi

GL account determination for vendor invoice in cross company sale sales

Hi
we are planning to implement cross company sales scenario.
High level design-
1) Sales Order is in co code X and the delivery is from group company lets say co code Y
2) The delivery from co code Y generates two invoices- one in Sales area of co code X for the final customer and 2nd in sales area of co code Y for the inter company
3) The intercompany invoice has EDI output type (Sap standard delivered object is RD04). The output generates a IDOC which has ability to post automatic vendor invoice in co code X crediting the inter company vendor Y.
4) The automatic vendor invoice GL account determination is via customisation OBCB and OBCE
I have some questions around this , particularly if in the vendor invoice we have to account for material and returnable packaging
In my current project there would FG packed in returnable packaging in co code Y
For Export there would be a dedicated co code(X).
Co code X gets orders from customers; and creates sales orders in its sales area with delivery plant of co code Y.
Along with FG returnable packaging is also charged as deposit by - co code X to customer and Co code Y to Co code X.
so in the vendor invoice how to generate the following entry
Inter company vendor              150 Cr
Cost of Goods sold         100 Dr
Returnable Packages deposit    50 Dr.
Similarly when the end customer returns the packaging generate the following entry via the cross company return order and intercompany invoice
intercompany vendor 50 Dr
Returnable packages 50 Cr
if you have worked on this kind of scenario and share how to customise to post for FG and Returnable packaging separately in the automatic vendor invoice it would be great.
Edited by: pravin_shah1403 on Nov 25, 2011 3:00 PM

Hi Pravin.
Did you figure this out?
I'm seeing that via OBCB we can hit only one G/L account.
We also need to hit multiple accounts.
We've figured out how to hit this via user-exit, however I'm hoping that I've missed something in configuration and that a resolution via configuration is possible?
Any ideas?

Cross company code downpayment posting error

Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
Shanid

Hi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu

Cross-company code postings - FI validation

Hi,
We start using the cross-company code postings (transaction OBYA) between company code A and company code B and have to give authorizations both company codes to the Finance users. The idea is to have a set of G/L accounts which are allowed to be used when company code A and B are posted via cross-company code posting.
SAP recommends to implement a validation in FI to restrict the Intercompany scenatios. I attempted to create a FI validation for complete document (call-point 3) with no success:
1)
IC Rule: BSEG-BUKRS = A and BSEG-BUKRS = B and BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC rule
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
When I test it, the Intercompany clearing account configured in OBYA, and which is in ACCOUNTSET, shows up in the error message, which unwanted.
2)
IC Rule 1: BKPF-BUKRS = '0017' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '0005'
IC Rule 2: BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC Rule 1 --> IC Rule 2
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
No error message is issued at all, even if the G/L account is not in ACCOUNTSET.
Please advise what I am missing.

Hi Nitin,
Thank you for your feeback.
I just wanted to clarify that the cross-company code posting is when company code A can intitiate a posting to company code B simultaneously (for example Intercompany re-charge, cash concentration, etc.). The trigger for cross-company code posting is the company code field on the line item. If company code A is in the header (BKPF-BUKRS) and at least one document line item filled up as company code B, the system created two documents for each company code, offsetting the Intercompany clearing account, configured in OBYA.
For example:
Posting via FB50: Leading company code = company code A (BKPF-BUKRS)
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200; Company code A (as a default)
Item 2: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100; Company code B (manually changed)
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300; Company code A (as a default)
The systen creates two postings:
Posting 1: company code A
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200;
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300;
Item 2: Debit ; I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
Posting 2: company code B
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100;
Item 2: Credit;I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
The only connection between the two is the cross-company code number (BKPF-BVORG), which assigned by the system once posted, as a logical connection.
I guess we could use a dedicated document type. If that's the case, how would the validation work then?
Coudl you please share more details on the BTE option?
Thank you,
Inna

Cross company Stock Transport with Intercompany billing

hi,
I'm trying to use the standard cross company stock transport order process, however, when i create the initail purchase order in the ordering company, the shipping tab does not appear, preventing me from creating a delivery. The customers and vendors have been assigned correctly. Can anybody help ???

dear govender
refer this
STO PROCESS
Stock Transfer Orders comes into picture when the stock is moving / Transferring between two different plants with two Different Company Codes or Stock Transfer between two plants with One Company Code the Difference are given below:
P.O Order types and Delivery Types
STO: - Stock Transfer Order Intra Company
Stock Transfer between Two Plants with One Company code.
The Purchase Order Type is Used in this case is "UB".
And the Delivery Type Used here is "NL".
Goods Movement type: 641
Item Category in delivery is NLN
STPO: - Stock Transfer Purchase Order Inter Company
Stock Transfer Purchase Orders between Two Plants with Two Different Company Codes.
The Purchase Order Type is Used in this case is "NB".
And the Delivery Type Used here is "NLCC".
Goods Movement type: 643
Item Category in delivery is NLC
A. Configure Intercompany Stock Transport Order
Material should exist in both the plants (Delivering & Ordering),
Internal customer should be assigned to the ordering plant ( MM -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Setup stock transport order -> assign the internal customer to the ordering plant and assign the Sales area of the internal customer.
Assign its Sales area to the delivering plant
Assign the document type and Delivery type NB and NLCC
Assign the Supplying plant --> Receiving Plant --> NB
Take the delivering plant and assign the sales area.
Vendor master has to be created and assign the supply source (Delivering Plant).
Create a purchase order ME21N ---> Save
Delivery VL10 G ---> Calculation rule (appropriate) --> Assign the purchase order number here and execute.
Select the Delivery creation line and do the back ground process.
Start the log display and see the delivery document number by the documents button
Goto VL02N --> do picking and PGI --> Then do the MIGO with respect to the delivery document.
Billing (Intercompany pricing conditions should be set).
AND
1. Customer No. for the Goods Receiving Plant - OMGN
2. Availability Check- Checking Rule (if necessary) - OMGN
3. Assign a Delivery Type for the Delivering Plant - OMGN (for Stock Transport Orders, NLCC)
4. PO type (which i believe you have done) - OMGN
5. Assign Vendor No. to the Supplying Plant (done) - VK02
6. Assign Customer No. to the Purchasing Plant for the Inter-Company Invoice (but you need to assign this to the Sales Organization pre-assigned to the Purchasing Plant),
IMG-SD-Billing-InterCompany Billing-Define Internal Customer No. by Sales Org
***and by the way for the Invoice to work between Cross-Company Plants, you need also to have a Sales Org for the Supplying Plant and a Pricing Determination Procedure
INTERCOMPANY PRICING:
PI01 Intercompany: fixed amount per material unit
PI02 Intercompany: percentage of the net invoice amount
These condition types specify that the price charged by the delivering plant to the sales organization is shown as a statistical value in the sales order and an effective charge in the internal invoice.
The condition records you create and maintain for intercompany billing are the same kind of records that you create for pricing in general.
IV01 Inter-company Price ERLOS Revenue
IV02 Inter-company % ERLOS Revenue
STO CONFIG:
The following steps have to be followed in order to configure stock transport order between two plants.
1. Create a vendor for the Company code of the receiving plant using account group 0007 via T-Code XK01.
2. In the purchasing data view assign the supplying plant and the schema group
3. Create customer with the sales area of the vendor.
4. The shipping conditions, the delivering plant and the transportation zone determine the route in the STO.
5. In the pricing procedure determination relevant to the STO assign document pricing procedure and customer pricing procedure to get the pricing in the invoice.
6. Maintain condition records for pricing condition.
7. Maintain carrier as a partner in the customer master.
8. In OMGN select the supplying plant and assign the company code and sales area. Similarly select the receiving plant and assign the company code and sales area (The company code to which the plant is assigned to).
9. Assign the delivery type and checking rule to the document type.
10. And finally, assign the purchasing document type to the supplying plant and the receiving plant.
11. Create the STO using T-Code ME 21N and save.
12. Check for release strategy if any and release using T-Code ME 28.
13. Create delivery in background using VL10G.
14. If delivery is created, it is an indication of correct configuration and master data creation.
Stock transfer between two plants in different company codes is known as inter company stock transfer.
Material should be maintained in both supplying and receiving plant MM01
Stock should maintain only in supplying plant MB1C
Create receiving plant as a customer in supplying plants company code and sales area XD01
Assign this customer number in receiving plant details OMGN
Assign supplying sales area in supplying plant details OMGN
Assign delivery type NB for in combination of supplying/ receiving plants.
Create STO ME21N
As it is normal there in the item details we should get shipping date i.e. customer number
Go for Delivery VL10B
Shipping point *****
Select PO go for execute
then select the delivery then go for delvy ............create delvy,,,, delvy number generated.
Goods Issue VL02
Delvy doc **********
Click on picking
enter the picking qty
Click on PGI
in the mean time check in the PO history you will get the details
Goods receipt MIGO
Stock overview the stock will be updated....
Check the below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4d/2ba31643ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Stock transfers that include deliveries and billing documents/invoices are only possible between plants belonging to different company codes.
If you want to carry out a cross-company-code stock transport order with delivery but without a billing document, you must set the Relevant for Billing (data element FKREL) indicator in Customizing of the item type to "blank" (Not relevant for billing).
The following applications are involved in this type of stock transfer:
Purchasing (MM-PUR) in entering the order
Shipping (LE-SHP) in making the delivery from the issuing plant
Billing (SD-BIL) in creating the billing document for the delivery
Inventory Management (MM-IM) at goods receipt in the receiving plant
Invoice Verification (MM-IV) at invoice receipt in the receiving
Transfer of goods from one location to another location, it may be between plants within the same company code or in different company code's plants.
within the company code, but plants,
receiving plant will raise the STO in Supplying/issuing plant-ME21n,
Supplying plant will deliver the goods to receiving plants ,
then we need to pick n post the Goods Issue-VL02n,
now when we can observe that the STO qty will be added into receiving plant and reduced in Delivering plant,
To do this, we need do prior customization in SPRO-IMG,-
material should be created in both plants( receiving & Supplying)
-maintain the stock only in supplying plant
-create a dummy customer in supplying plant's sales area(if u have one sales area, create in tat comp code n sales area)
-assign this customer number to receiving plant's details along with the sales area,
-Assign the STO doc type(UB) to Supplying plant, along with checking rule
-Assign the Del type (NL/NLCC) to Supplying n receiving plant.
*Del type=NL is not relevant for billing, where as NLCC is relevant for billing
rewards if it helps
siva

Cross-company purchasing

Hi,
In my company we have a scenario where one purchasing org serving 2 co.code. This has been set up nicely in ECC, and we suppose to have the same scenario in SRM as well.
First, I do this:
a. Create company A and company B
b. Create org unit below A which is linked to central purchasing org X in backend,
c. Making sure that attribute BUK (Co.code) A, B assigned to purchasing org X.
d. Create org unit below purch org X, and linked to purchasing group Y in backend,
e. Create person Z below purchasing group Y, the attribute BUK of A, B is inherited to him.
Using user id Z I make a test, create PO using cost center in co.code B, and it works well, the PO created passed to backend using purch org X, co.code B
When testing creating PO using cost center in co.code A, it fail. It seems that somehow co.code B is defaulted in PO, and it trigger error saying cross-company purchasing not allowed (I think because I'm using PO with co.code B to charge Cost center in A).
At first I hope that setting BOTH co.code for the purchaser will lead SAP to use location to derive the co.code, but I was wrong. SAP still take the FIRST co.code it found in the attribute.
Then, I plan to use BADI for document change; and to my suprise there is no way to change the co.code in the BADI. So I'm stuck in here as well.
Lastly, I did this:
a. Moving purch org X (and all below, including purch group Y and person Z) to the root,
b. I remove the attribute BUK in the purchasing org
With this I hope that SAP cannot find the co.code from attribute and for the last resort derive the co.code from the location.
Then when creating the PO, I got error message that SAP cannot derive co.code, and cannot continue
Then I'm in dead end now. Is it really NOT possible to have central purchasing in SRM? This seems to be wrong. I mean as SRM is targeted to make procurement simple and regulated, it sure SHOULD think about central purchasing. Even in ECC we can have a central procurement serving 2 company codes.
Or is there any other way? Appreciate if someone can shed some light on this.
Best regards,
John

This is related to change co.code in PO. SAP give note 1079525 as how to change web dynpro so field co.code will appear and letting purchaser to choose co.code. This has solved our issue

Cross Company MIRO Transaction - BSEG-TXGRP Not Valued for Account Type "S"

I am working with the ABAP group to create tax reports for audits and sales tax charged by vendor. I am basically wanting a line item report of all purchases along with any tax applied to each line. Therefore, I am, for the most part, using tables BKPF, BSEG, and BSET. For our US transactions, we have one company paying the invoice on behalf of all other US companies. Essentially, every transaction is a cross-company transaction. The problem is I am having a hard time tying BSEG to BSET by line item. For FB60 transactions, I can tie BSEG-TXGRP to BSET-TXGRP; however, for MIRO transactions, BSEG-TXGRP is not valued for Account Type "S" (GL Accounts). Any ideas? I could not find a note to capture this issue. There was a note, but it was with regard to Account Types "D" and "K" I believe, vendor and customer accounts.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Deanna

So,
Did you ever resolve this. I have the EXACT problem right now. Inter-co. MIRO documents only getting TAXGRP popuplated for Original Co. Document (not cross-co. document).
Thanks,
- Tim

CIN Cross Company Code Utilisation

Hi Gurus,
Business requires Cenvat available in one plant of one company code to be utilised in another plant of another company code.
Comapny Code A is a trader and Company Code B is a manufacturer. (Both Company Code are under one Company ABand balance sheet is prepared at company AB Level )
Company Code A receives material in plant A1 from external Vendor and sends that material to Company Code B in Plant B1for job Work.
The External Vendor Charges excise duty on material supplied to company A.
Company A wants the excise duty charged by external vendor to be transferred to Company Code B.
Company Code B will utilise this Cevat for setoff against the excise duty it will charge for doing job work
How can this be done through cross company JV (manual accounting) or through CIN process??

Hi, ok17 is not for cross company,but for CO-FI real time integration.
Ex. you maintained for "RKL Actual activity allocation" Dr 123 Cr 567
Then while posting activity allocation in CO you'll get posting like Dr 123 Cr 567 (with corresponding CO objects)

IDOC INPUT INVOIC FI Issue (Cross Company Sales)

Hello All,
As you know this IDOC posts the FI document for the cross company sales in the receiving company code.
I have found some business issues that I need advice for:-
1. If part of the sale has "free good" then SAP is grabbing the "cost price VPRS" from the billing document.
2. No material numbr from the SD billing document is added into the FI item. When I display the FI document the material is in the screen control. I guess I may need to use a userexit that allows me to add it manually in the field or as a text item.
3. CO-PA posting doesn't exist for the FI document as SAP advises that the GL account in OBCB is not a cost element. If I added the GL as a cost element then I would need to use a substitution or userexit ... to then change profit centre, etc. Note, if costs are not going into CO-PA then this will show incorrect sales profit figures, as cross company invoice is flowing into CO-PA.
4. Italy "free goods" have VAT charged, so I'm thinking that the IDOC cannot be used for Italy as mentioned in (1) above.
Looking for some handy advice. Note I have seen IDOC questions here and in SD, so not too sure this is the best place.
Regards and Thanks
Waza

hi
In Segment E1EDK01 there is a field EIGENUINR which holds the VaT number.
Regards
Prajwala K.

Cross company tax transfer posting

Dear All
The following transaction is cross company related
For cocd 4100
Bank charges Export sales   Rs 1000 Dr    Tax code S1
Service tax                                   100 Dr                    S1
E.cess                                      2 Dr                    S1
H cess                                          1 Dr                     S1
Cross Co Clearing A/c                   1103 Cr
For Cocd 1000
   HDFC bank                    1103 Cr
   Cross co clearing a/c                        1103 Dr.
Our client would like to post the tax amount on co.code 1000.
I have already set the configuration for
SPRO>Financial Accounting (New)> Financial Accounting Basic Settings (New)> Tax on Sales/Purchases>Posting>Transfer Posting of Tax for Cross-Company Code Transactions
Co.cd1        Cocd2      Taxcdorgin
4100            1000            S1
Then I have run Program RFBUST10 through T/code SE38 but system showing u201CNo lsit generatedu201D
Please advice.
Regards
Avijit

Issue resolved by self !

Cross Company Services

Hi Friends
Plz find the details of scenario of our current project,
we have two plants which are 1000, 1010
Hide quoted text -
These two plants are having two different company codes,
Maintenance plant is subdivided by location to facilitate the maintenance jobs. The 1010 maintenance jobs are organized directly from central maintenance department 1000.
Preventive maintenance & routine maintenance for packaging machines of 1010 is carried out by 1010 (team of attendants).
Preventive maintenance & routine maintenance for bulk manufacturing of 1010 is carried out by central maintenance department 1000.
Preventive and routine maintenance of all the equipments related to HVAC & utility services attached to 1010 plant is managed by central maintenance team 1000.
Mazal will give every moth service charges to 1000 for handling rest of all maintenance activities (with out packing area).
Plz suggest me how to map this in SAP. In this mainly my problem is these two are different company codes.
And also if u have any expericnce in this first option plz send me detailed information.
Thanks & Regards,
Raj

Hi, ok17 is not for cross company,but for CO-FI real time integration.
Ex. you maintained for "RKL Actual activity allocation" Dr 123 Cr 567
Then while posting activity allocation in CO you'll get posting like Dr 123 Cr 567 (with corresponding CO objects)

Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

Hi
I have just joined the community and ready with 3 queries.
Please.......... help me to resolve.
i) While executing the cross company payment ( company code 1300 making payment for vendor in company code 0013) using transaction code F-53, I am getting error 'vendor not defined in company code 1300'.
For F-53 screen, vendor is selected from company code 0013.
I have executed APP (F110) successfully in company code 1300 for paying the same vendor in company code 0013.
ii) For check deposit transaction, error is " entry 1300 is missing in table TO43S'. (1300 is a company code)
iii) For check issue transaction, error is "no batch input data for screen SAPMF05A'
Thanks
Rekha

1. Don't give vendor number in the main screen, give all remaining inouts and press enter, then it'll show the second screen
there you can give the company code and vendor account.
2. Cretae a tolerance group for GL accounts in OBA0.
Don't post more than one query in the same thread.
Rgds
Murali. N

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Stock report for cross-company sales

Dear all,
We are using for our Saudi Arabia company the cross-company sales process with sourcing unit in another country.
There is a Legal requirement in Saudi to provide a Stock report (with "stock in", "stock out" quantities and values).
But with the cross-company sales process the stock movements are not visible in Saudi.
Any advice ? Is there a report in SAP for this legal reqirement in Saudi Arabia ?
Best regards

Hi,
Try to use t-code MB51, will give you a list with the relevant movement types!
Good luck
Tao

Cross Company Charge

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for