CUCM 8.6 Dropped call transfers involving SIP phones

Hi All,
I am a developer who has been tasked with figuring out why call transfers are being dropped by Cisco CUCM when the original call comes from a SIP phone.  This scenario works:
Cisco phone calls another Cisco phone, which transfers the original call to a SIP phone
These scenarios do not work:
SIP phone calls Cisco phone, which transfers the original call to another Cisco phone
SIP phone calls Cisco phone, which transfers the original call to another SIP phone
I have researched the Call Manager traces to the best of my ability, and I see some info in there that could potentially point to the source of the problem.  I am just unable to understand what the trace means:
10:23:08.672 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(1,74,2342)/ci=24377698/ccbId=175645/scbId=0/active_CcDisconnReq: ccDisconnReq.onBehalfOf=Media : ccDisconnReq.s.sv=2 : ccDisconnReq.c.cv=47 |1,100,63,1.93259^10.10.10.85^*
10:23:08.672 |//SIP/Stack/Info/0x0/sipConstructContainerContext #### Created container=0xb0b42f58|1,100,71,1.1^*^*
10:23:08.672 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(1,74,2342)/ci=24377698/ccbId=175645/scbId=0/appendReasonHdr: appendReasonHdr - Invalid Disconnect Cause(cause=47), No Reason Header Appended|1,100,63,1.93259^10.10.10.85^*
10:23:08.672 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(1,74,2342)/ci=24377698/ccbId=175645/scbId=0/appendRPIDHdrForOriginalCalledParty: SIP device does not Support Orig Dialled Phone nego: 0|1,100,63,1.93259^10.10.10.85^*
I have been wondering whether this could be a codec issue, however the SIP phones we are using are configured with the following codecs:
G711U
G711A
G722
ILBC
GSM
and our SIP software is  also set to accept the first codec offered by the remote side.  It seems from the SIP client logs that G722 is being used as the codec to communicate with the Cisco phones, but perhaps I'm misinterpreting.
I have attached a CUCM trace of a call from a SIP phone (ext. 491) to a Cisco handset (ext. 170) where the Cisco handset attempts to transfer the call to another SIP phone (ext. 492).  The trace snippet shown above is from this log.
I would really appreciate it if someone more experienced with VoIP/SIP/CUCM could take a look and offer any ideas on what the issue might be, and also how we might be able to address it.  I can try to provide more info about our CUCM configuration if needed.
Thanks in advance!

Leslie, so here is what I found from the traces....
To understand the difference we need to understand how cucm performs call transfers from a sccp signalling point and a sip signalling point
SCCP
When the transfer key is pressed
1. CUCM sends a CloseReceiveChannel and StopMediaTransmission to the IP phone involved in active media (referenced by the callids)
NB, here CUCM updates the call state on the phone to a call state of 8 which is "Hold"
2.CUCM tells the held party to listen MOH from MOH server
3.CUCM establishes newcall leg with the intended transfered destination..Once this call is connected
4.CUCM receives a new Transfer instruction from the transferring phone to connect the held party
5..CUCM sends a CloseReceiveChannel between the held phone and MOH server (to tear down the media)
6. Next CUCM sends a CloseReceiveChannel and StopMediaTransmission to the transfering party & transfered party to remove Xferring party from call
7. finally CUCM sends OpenReceiveChannel between the original called party and the transfered party..and call is done
For SIP signalling. when the first transfer key is pressed
1. CUCM sends invite (re-invite) with an inactive SDP (a=inactive) to indicate a break in media path
2. CUCM sends a Delayed offer to insert MOH or to resume Media stream
NB: CUCM expects a sendrecv offer with SDP to the DO. (NB:if cucm gets an inactive offer SDP in the 200 OK instead of providing a send-recv offer SDP, the media path remains in an inactive state and causes calls to dropcall will drop),CUCM sends an ACK with sendonly to the 200 OK
3.CUCM establishes newcall leg with the intended transfered destination..Once this call is connected
4.CUCM receives a new Transfer instruction from the transferring phone to connect the held party
5. Next CUCM sends a re-invite with an inactive SDP to indicate a break in media path to MOH (in attempt to complete transfer)
6.Next CUCM sends an inactive SDP to indicate a break in media path between transfering party & transfered party to remove Xferring party from call
7. Next CUCM sends a DO re-invite to connect the transfered party. The far end then sends 200 OK with the required SDP to connect the call
Now having explained all of these, we need to look at where the call is failing for SIP-----SCCP----SIP calls without MTP
lets look at succesful SCCP-----SCCP-----SIP without MTP
Point 4 above
++++++++Extension 170 presses the transfer button to connect the two calls (Callid=24378483)+++++++++++++
(0003395) SoftKeyEvent softKeyEvent=4(Trnsfer) lineInstance=1 callReference=24378483
Point 5 above
++++Next CUCM closed the media between extension 160 and MOH server callid=24378480(this is the only active call on this callid)+++
(0003396) CloseReceiveChannel conferenceID=24378480 passThruPartyID=16777845.  myIP: IpAddr.type:0 ipv4Addr:0x0a0a0a89(10.10.10.137)
Point 6 Above
+++++Next cucm closes the call between extension 170 and 490 callid=(24378483)++++++++
(0003395) CloseReceiveChannel conferenceID=24378483 passThruPartyID=16777847.  myIP: IpAddr.type:0 ipv4Addr:0x0a0a0a8b(10.10.10.139)
(0003395) StopMediaTransmission conferenceID=24378483 passThruPartyID=16777847.  myIP: IpAddr.type:0 ipv4Addr:0x0a0a0a8b(10.10.10.139)
Point 6 above for the sip side (since the destination is SIP, to tear down media to SCCP phone, so as to connect the caller to the xfered party)
+++++++Next CUCM sends a re-invite with a=inactive SDP to the sip phone ++++++++++++
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP TCP message to 10.10.10.104 on port 62220 index 1890
[885626,NET]
INVITE sip:[email protected]:62220;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK23332dbee978
From: ;tag=192115~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378484
o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 192115 2 IN IP4 10.10.10.195
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
m=audio 24560 RTP/AVP 9 101
a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000
a=ptime:20
a=inactive-----------------------------------------------------Inactive
Still part of Point 6 for SIP signalling
++++++++++++Next sip phone responds with a 200 OK recevonly SDP +++++++++++++++++++
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message from 10.10.10.104 on port 62220 index 1890 with 683 bytes:
[885628,NET]
SIP/2.0 200 OK
v=0
o=- 18077 11099 IN IP4 10.10.10.104
s=yasdjip
c=IN IP4 10.10.10.104
t=0 0
a=ptime:20
a=recvonly-------------------------------------a=recvonly
Finally Point 7 above..
+++++++++++++=Next cucm sends a DO re-invite to extension 492-sip phone++++++++++
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP TCP message to 10.10.10.104 on port 62220 index 1890
[885630,NET]
INVITE sip:[email protected]:62220;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK233534ffec4a
From: ;tag=192115~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378484
To: ;tag=5B0E9816C2CA6D70F3166FB972EDE4C2
+++++++Next we get a 200 OK from sip phone with sdp=sendrecv+++++++++=
/SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message from 10.10.10.104 on port 62220 index 1890 with 683 bytes:
[885634,NET]
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK233534ffec4a
Contact:
From: ;tag=192115~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378484
Call-ID: [email protected]
v=0
o=- 18077 11099 IN IP4 10.10.10.104
s=yasdjip
c=IN IP4 10.10.10.104
t=0 0
m=audio 16574 RTP/AVP 9 101
a=rtpmap:101 TELEPHONE-EVENT/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=ptime:20
a=sendrecv
+Now CUCM sends an OpenReceiveChannel and start media xmission to sccp phone (callid=24378480) with media parameters of sip phone++++++
(0003396) OpenReceiveChannel conferenceID=24378480 passThruPartyID=16777848 millisecondPacketSize=20 compressionType=6(Media_Payload_G722_64k) RFC2833PayloadType=101 qualifierIn=? sourceIpAddr=IpAddr.type:0 ipAddr:0x0a0a0a68000000000000000000000000(10.10.10.104). myIP: IpAddr.type:0 ipv4Addr:0x0a0a0a89(10.10.10.137)
(0003396) startMediaTransmission conferenceID=24378480 passThruPartyID=16777848 remoteIpAddress=IpAddr.type:0 ipAddr:0x0a0a0a68000000000000000000000000(10.10.10.104)
remotePortNumber=16574 milliSecondPacketSize=20 compressType=6(Media_Payload_G722_64k) RFC2833PayloadType=101 qualifierOut=?. myIP: IpAddr.type:0 ipv4Addr:0x0a0a0a89(10.10.10.137)
+++++++++++=Next Phone sends its ACK+++++++++++++++
(0003396) OpenReceiveChannelAck Status=0, IpAddr=IpAddr.type:0 ipAddr:0x0a0a0a89000000000000000000000000(10.10.10.137), Port=20352, PartyID=16777848
+++++++++++=Next CUCM sends ACK to 200 OK from SIP Phone+++++++++++
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP TCP message to 10.10.10.104 on port 62220 index 1890
[885635,NET]
ACK sip:[email protected]:62220;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK23366067b8c0
From: ;tag=192115~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378484
To: ;tag=5B0E9816C2CA6D70F3166FB972EDE4C2
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:44:45 GMT
Call-ID: [email protected]
Max-Forwards: 70
CSeq: 103 ACK
Allow-Events: presence
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 237
v=0
o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 192115 3 IN IP4 10.10.10.195
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 10.10.10.137
b=TIAS:64000
b=AS:64
t=0 0
m=audio 20352 RTP/AVP 9 101
a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000
a=ptime:20
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
Now at this point all is well...and the call is connected....
Now here is where the call is failing on the SIP-SCCP-SIP call without MTP
From Point 2 above, CUCM sends a DO to insert MOH, and then gets response, then sends an ACK to 200 Ok back to SIP Phone..
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP TCP message to 10.10.10.104 on port 53361 index 1810
[881160,NET]
ACK sip:[email protected]:53361;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22035ecc1fcb
From: ;tag=190666~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378214
To: "492" ;tag=97C34E1FB9A11F83DD8D8F5BA4C87C57
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:38:50 GMT
Call-ID: 1CCA5149B966DC89AE0F752B8EF86480BC7102DB
Max-Forwards: 70
CSeq: 102 ACK
o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 190666 3 IN IP4 10.10.10.195
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 10.10.10.195---------------------------------------IP address of MOH server
t=0 0
m=audio 4000 RTP/AVP 0--------------------------------MOH port 4000
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=ptime:20
a=sendonly---------------------------------------------------------sendonly
+++++NOW Point 6 above (SIP) CUCM sends a=inactive to break media path to MOH server to connect caller and xfered party++++++
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP TCP message to 10.10.10.104 on port 53361 index 1810
[881161,NET]
INVITE sip:[email protected]:53361;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22045bb7f918
From: ;tag=190666~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378214
To: "492" ;tag=97C34E1FB9A11F83DD8D8F5BA4C87C57
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:39:04 GMT
Call-ID: 1CCA5149B966DC89AE0F752B8EF86480BC7102DB
Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
Min-SE:  1800
User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM8.6
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
CSeq: 103 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: presence
Remote-Party-ID: ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Contact:
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 164
v=0
o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 190666 4 IN IP4 10.10.10.195
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0--------------------------------------------------------------------Media IP is 0.0.0.0
t=0 0
m=audio 4000 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=ptime:20
a=inactive---------------------------------------------------------------------media inactive
At this point, we should get a response back from the sip phone...
and here is what we got..
++Trying which is expected++++
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message from 10.10.10.104 on port 53361 index 1810 with 331 bytes:
[881162,NET]
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK22045bb7f918
From: ;tag=190666~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378214
Call-ID: 1CCA5149B966DC89AE0F752B8EF86480BC7102DB
CSeq: 103 INVITE
To: "492" ;tag=97C34E1FB9A11F83DD8D8F5BA4C87C57
Content-Length: 0
++++++++Then we get a BYE+++++++++++++++
/SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message from 10.10.10.104 on port 53361 index 1810 with 576 bytes:
[881163,NET]
BYE sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.104:53361;branch=z9hG4bKa2vdQvR7J9OiMyjU;rport
Contact:
Max-Forwards: 70
From: "492" ;tag=97C34E1FB9A11F83DD8D8F5BA4C87C57
Allow: OPTIONS, INVITE, ACK, REFER, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY
Supported: replaces, path
User-Agent: Acrobits Softphone Business/2.4.8
To: ;tag=190666~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378214
Call-ID: 1CCA5149B966DC89AE0F752B8EF86480BC7102DB
CSeq: 3 BYE
Content-Length: 0
So this is the root cause of the problem. Your SIP phone does not know how to respond to multiple media break between it and the MOH server.
The difference between this and the succesful SCCP-SIP--SCCP, is that the held party was a sccp phone, hence the sip phone only has to process one a=inactive SDP message, where as in the SIP-SCCP-SIP, the help party was sip, so the sip phone has to process two a=inactive SDP messages
Now what is the difference when MTP is involved! A Big difference. MTP stays in the media path. So there is never a break in media and no inactive SDP attribute is sent. The flow looks like below:
for the initial call...The SIP phone sends its media to MTP and likewise the SCCP phone
SIP------Media------MTP------------Media-------SCCP Phone
When the new destination is dialled and transfer is commited,
SIP-------------media----MTP--------media---------MTP
The final invoite sent to connect 492 and 491 has MTP as the IP address to connect Media to.
++++++++Ivite to 492 ++++++++++++++
INVITE sip:[email protected]:61303;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK231a3b24b862
From: ;tag=192048~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378472
To: ;tag=78FF5BF6C019A55EA020B69BB6A767E2
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:24:59 GMT
Call-ID: [email protected]
Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
Min-SE:  1800
User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM8.6
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: presence
Remote-Party-ID: ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Contact:
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 214
v=0
o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 192048 1 IN IP4 10.10.10.195
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 10.10.10.195---------------------------------------------------------------the MTP ip address
t=0 0
m=audio 25038 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=ptime:20
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
+++++++Invite to 491 +++++++++++++++++
//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP TCP message to 10.10.10.94 on port 50376 index 1887
[885429,NET]
INVITE sip:[email protected]:50376;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.10.195:5060;branch=z9hG4bK231b78d1b56
From: ;tag=192046~d8e94532-127d-4dca-bba0-64b1675da032-24378467
To: "491" ;tag=F13CE94DE942C47680356A647DC7F916
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:24:59 GMT
Call-ID: AE7045FFB2D8D9C28D54651473A14A5D41B5B93C
Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
Min-SE:  1800
User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM8.6
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: presence
Remote-Party-ID: "Leslie2" ;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=off
Contact:
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 237
v=0
o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 192046 1 IN IP4 10.10.10.195
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 10.10.10.195----------------------------------------MTP
b=TIAS:64000
b=AS:64
t=0 0
m=audio 25030 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=ptime:20
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
Wao! That was a long one isnt it...It was fun too.
So now you can look at your sip phones and see if they can accept two inactive sdp messages within the same call. That way you can remove MTP. otherwise you will have MTP involved in every single call involving a sip phone, even if they do not involve transfers
Please rate all useful posts
"opportunity is a haughty goddess who waste no time with those who are unprepared"

Similar Messages

  • How to set busy trigger and max number of calls for a sip phone in SRST

    How is it possible to set the maximum number of calls and busy trigger for a line on a sip phone in SRST .There is no commands like dual-line or octo-line for the max-dn like under call-manager-fallback .
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

    So is the answer then that there is no way for a SIP phone in SRST mode to handle multiple calls? I have a site currently failed over in SRST mode, and I have noticed that the reception phone can only handle one call at a time. If I place a second call to it I get a busy signal.

  • Constantly dropping calls no matter the phone

    All Verizon phones constantly drop calls in my house.  Signal constantly bounces from 2-4 bars when the phones aren't moving.  The only place I can make calls without dropping signal is if I step out in my back yard.  How do I put in a ticket or have someone check this out.  The problem has been here since I moved in 2 years ago, however it's progressively gotten worse.  Phones are HTC Winphone 8x and Samsung Brightside, but family's Droid X2, Iphone 4, Iphone 5, LG showtime, and a couple other basic phones all have same issue.

        Hi mtpica112471!
    I apologize for the inconvenience because I realize the importance of operable service! Let's look into this. Current zip code? There can challenges present with indoor coverage.
    Thanks,
    AyaniB_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • CUCM 8.6 call busy between SIP phones and thirdparty phones

    Hi Everybody,
    I have the following error on my logs:
    Invalid Disconnect Cause(cause=47), No Reason Header Appended
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/getXCiscoViPRFallbackIDAndDTMFKey: Device type 8, Pstn Fallback is not enabled|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/getDefCcRegister: Secure status=1, mSrtpPresent=0|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/compareAndUpdateMedia: sdpStatus=0, CMEndPointSDP role=1, SIPEndPointSdpRole=2|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/getDefCcRegister: Secure status=1, mSrtpPresent=0|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/handleSIPUACSessionExpires: isMidCall[0], response[200], method[102]|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/parseSessionExpires: refresh_interval[1800], refresher[uas]|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/setSIPSessionExpiresTimer: interval[1768] secs|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/handleSecureRec: enforce srtp flag: 0, remote end srtp support: 0|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/updateCNToCC: identityCngFlag[0x1f], isConnInfoInd[1], ccContactHeader[]|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/handleSIPConnectInd: Exit with state = outCall_200Rcvd|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/handleSIPConnectInd: Exit with state = outCall_200Rcvd|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.091 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/setSIPUpdateFlags: mIsUpdateForSignalingAllowed = 1  mIsUpdateForMediaAllowed = 1  mPendingOutgoingUpdate = 0|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/appendReasonHdr: appendReasonHdr - Invalid Disconnect Cause(cause=47), No Reason Header Appended|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/addTransparencyInfo: attaching transparency object|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/appendRPIDHdrForOriginalCalledParty: SIP device does not Support Orig Dialled Phone nego: 0|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |//SIP/SIPCdpc(3,74,281707)/ci=144600614/ccbId=35257792/scbId=0/getDefAe: SIPCdpc=281707, nodeId=3, processNumber=73  ci=144600614, branch=0|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |MRM::waiting_MrmDeallocateMtpResourceReq- Deallocate received for CI=53993831 count=0|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |MRM::waiting_DeallocateMtpResourceReq- ERROR  Deallocate received for an unknown Call Identifier  Ci = 53993831|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |//SIP/SIPHandler/ccbId=0/scbId=0/sip_stop_timer: type=SIP_TIMER_DISCONNECT value=500 retries=10|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |//SIP/SIPHandler/ccbId=0/scbId=0/sip_start_timer: type=SIP_TIMER_DISCONNECT value=500 retries=10|3,100,63,1.36454459^192.168.0.15^*
    14:46:50.098 |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP UDP message to 192.168.0.15:[5060]:
    the calling number is 34967850938
    the callied number is 19026

    Julien,
    Please use the link be low to collect cucm traces and use the advanced editor on the forum (located on top right hand corner of the discussion widnow) to attach the trace
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29901
    Ensure you collect the trace from the folowing
    1. the server that the phone is registered to
    2. If this server is different from the server in the cucm group of the sip trunk, then you need to also collect traces from the server (s) in the cucm group assiged to the sip trunk that connects to the 3rd party cluster...
    NB: If you have three servers in the cucm group of the sip trunk, you have to collect the trace from all three servers. This is because calls are dsitributed in a round robin fashion to servers in a sip trunk...
    FInally before you send the trace over, please ensure the calling and called numbers are present. Also include the time of the test call
    Please rate all useful posts
    "opportunity is a haughty goddess who waste no time with those who are unprepared"

  • Why am I dropping calls on my I phone 5s?

    I have dropped more in a week with the 5s the in 2. Years with the 4s.

    if it works with headset connected then it's stuck it's a hardware issue
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3896498?start=0&tstart=0

  • Using Hookflash to set up conference calls in CUCM 7 with a Sip Phone

    Hi all,
    Not sure if I'm going the right way about this or if this is even possible, let me start by setting the scenario:
    We have Cisco Unified Call Manager 7 and have recently installed an non Cisco IP based telephone in a boardroom which we have successfully registered to the Call Manager using SIP.
    We would like to be able to setup audio conference calls from this SIP phone. It has a flash (hookflash) button which I believe can be used for this very purpose (it signals and offhook/onhook/offhook condition) which can be used to instruct a voice switch that it is requesting services (like conferencing).
    However I'm strugging to see how to set this up.
    Can anybody offer any advice on this subject?
    Regards,
    Martin

    SG
    Just an update to the question that I presented when I started this thread.
    You really never did say what type of a User Account you are using in your Premiere Elements 8.0/8.0.1 on Windows 7? But based on the information provided by several users, User Account with Administrative Rights seems to be the way to go since all of them were using it and had systems that were running well. I would have expected that based on the Premiere Elements Windows XP requirements. I have yet to have someone come forward to say that they are using Premiere Elements 8.0/8.0.1 on Windows 7 with a User Account with Standard Rights and the program is running well. Will you be that one?
    Besides me switching from Windows XP to Windows 7 in the near future, what motivated this line of questioning was the report that I had seen of a user with Premiere Elements 8.0/8.0.1on Windows 7 who was reporting "permission" error messages when trying to archive a project with the Project Archiver (Archiver "Trimmed" and Copy options). Further questioning brought out that the problem extended to the AutoSave feature as well. The user claimed to be saving to an external hard drive (formatted NTFS) with about 800 MB free space. And still further questioning brought out that the error message included a free space and/or permissions error. Yes, there were extremely large file sizes involved here (way over 4 GB)
    The story had a happy ending where the remedies were:
    1. User Account with Administrative Rights
    and the major
    2. Formatting the thought to be NTFS external hard drive from FAT32 to NTFS.
    ATR

  • Drop calls on landline phone

    I'm receiving more and more instances of drop calls on my home phone--both cordless and land line phone. Why?
    I was told that with fios this wouldn't happen.

    Your calls should not be dropping like that. You can reset the ONT box by using the following steps...
    Unplug the electrical power cord of your Battery Backup Unit (BBU) from the wall outlet.
    Open the battery cabinet on the BBU (you may need a screwdriver to do this).
    Disconnect the batter leads and wait 3 min. Reconnect the battery leads.
    Put the battery cabinet back on and then plug the power cord back into the wall
    This reboots the fiber optic terminal where all your services come in. If you are still having troubles, please send me a private message.  
    Anthony_VZ
    **If someones post has helped you, please acknowledge their assistance by clicking the red thumbs up button to give them Kudos. If you are the original poster and any response gave you your answer, please mark the post that had the answer as the solution**
    Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or plan

  • Third Party SIP Phone Alerting name

    Hello,
    We are having cisco ip phones & third party sip phones in our company. both are registered to same cucm 9.X.
    Now when cisco phones calls sip Phones. we are able to see the alerting name on cisco phone.
    Say, Cisco Phone "Phone-A" calls Third Party Sip phone "Phone-B". So, on cisco ip Phone display we are able to see "Phone-B".
    But same when we try from SIP phones to Cisco phones, we are unable to see the Alert name on the Sip Phone. only the Number we can see on the Sip phone.
    Any help will be highly appriciated.
    Thanks,

    Hi Amod.
    I'm terribly sorry cause I got what you are asking only now :(
    This behaviour depends on client capability.
    CUCM always send RPID ( remote-party ID) to the third party SIP client/phone on ring.
    If the client is capable to update the calling number into what it receives as RPID, than you'll be able to see calling name.
    I've read some release notes of XLITE and other  SIP Desk phone and it seems to be not mentioned.
    Sorry again
    Regards
    Carlo

  • CUCM: Third Party SIP Phone "Caller ID" is not displaying for outgoing calls

    Hi Team,
    we are running CUCM 9.1(2a),
    we have integrated Third Party SIP Phone(Avaya 1230 SIP Phone) with CUCM,
    Issue: Third Party SIP Phone "Caller ID" is not displaying for outgoing calls, we are able to see only the dailed Number,
    When "A" calls to "B", "A" can see only the dailed number of "B" but not the "Caller ID"
    Regards
    Ananthakumar

    Are A and B both Avaya phones?
    So it looks like you're not seeing the alerting name/connected name getting updated then?  Do you have alerting names configured on the directory numbers?  Might need to take a look at the SIP messaging to see if the alerting name/connected name is being sent to the Avaya phones and maybe they just aren't displaying it.  Might just be something that needs to be tweaked in the 46xxsettings.txt file.

  • Phone Dropping calls and disappointed in Verizon

    Very disappointed in Verizon Wirelessly. Over the past year my phone has continuously dropped calls. It's getting worse and worse. I went from have decent service  3 years ago to only being able to talk in my bedroom and kitchen over the past year. over the past six months I had to start going outside and now that's become a problem. Even in the town I live there are now many dead spots. 90 percent of my calls drop a day. at times phone won't even ring Some calls and text don't even come through until hours later. People are thinking that I am ducking thief calls, and I'm tired of explaining the situation to them. To make matters worse I have contacting Verizon several times over the past year only to be given the run around. I've been promised help but nothing. some were supposed to call me back with a solution but nothing. I was told a tech was coming, never saw them. I was told to buy a network extender almost 300.00 dollars, but why should I have to pay for this when I'm alrwady paying you every month. I tired of giving Verizon the benefit of the doubt, but I'm close to leaving them and taking many in my community with me, cause im not the only one suffering. Verizon step it up and give me what you promised "the most reliable service in America"
    oh and yes I have powered off phone, reset phone, replaced phones 3 times. I've done it all. So once and for all please HELP!!

    I am very disappointed at Verizon.  I am very very angry right now.  I called their customer service about getting a second line on my account and asked them if they had a return policy or if the device is lost or stolen would I be liable.  Both customer service reps that I spoke to on the phone both said that I would be able to stop the service as long as it was within the 14 days of purchase.  The only money I would not get back would be the money that I would have paid for the telephone, the activation fee and that is ALL.  I was going to take the risk and do this and ofcourse we would have to purchase the insurance.  But I even had the second customer service rep verify with her supervisor that if the phone was lost or stolen that we could stop the service and would not be responsible for anything more and the two year activation would be stopped.  She put me on hold and verified it and came back and said that I was correct and that that was true.  So I told her then I will go ahead and go to a verizon store and purchase a phone.  When I got there, I was told that it was NOT true.  I asked them to open the conversation from customer service and they did and he saw it, but the supervisor at the store would not let me see it.. as if it is a BIG secret.  If they can't be honest about it in the beginning then imagine how they are going to screw you in the end.  I finally had to walk out and I am so so so disappointed.  I want to cancel my existing service, but they have everyone by the balls... and they now it.  Something has got to change... Government, NOW it's time to get involved.  Anyone with me... say HEY!

  • CME SIP phone outside call issue

    Dear all,
    i have cme version 9.1 on router 2921 with 7962 sccp phones and 3905 sip phone.
    when i place outside call ( to pstn) using the below dial peer, call is processed. 
    when the call is answered by the autoattendent of the called company ( assume i called x company)  , i cant press any other numbers using the sip phones.
    i mean if i want to press zero for help or internal extension of the x company, these pressed numbered are not recognized by the analog panasonic PBX of the x company.
    Sccp phones works well.
    Any help please and below is the dial-peer.
    dial-peer voice 1003 pots
     trunkgroup 1
     corlist outgoing CITIES
     description CALLING CITIES
     destination-pattern 90[1-9]......
     forward-digits 8
    voice service voip
     allow-connections h323 to h323
     allow-connections h323 to sip
     allow-connections sip to h323
     allow-connections sip to sip
     no supplementary-service sip handle-replaces
     fax protocol t38 version 0 ls-redundancy 0 hs-redundancy 0 fallback none
     sip
      bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/2.10
      bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/2.10
      registrar server expires max 36000 min 600
    voice class codec 5
     codec preference 1 g729r8
     codec preference 2 g711ulaw
    voice register global
     mode cme
     source-address 10.100.4.20 port 5060
     max-dn 200
     max-pool 100
     load 3905 CP3905.9-2-1-0.loads
     authenticate register
     timezone 31
     date-format D/M/Y
     voicemail 177
     tftp-path flash:
     create profile sync 000473524028932A
     conference hardware
    voice register dn  1
     number 109
     allow watch
     pickup-call any-group
     pickup-group 170
     shared-line max-calls 3
    voice register pool  1
     id mac 6C99.8984.9678
     type 3905
     number 1 dn 1
     template 1
     dtmf-relay sip-notify
     voice-class codec 5
     username SFD1 password SFD1
    thanks

    Hi Yahsiel,
    firstly thanks for help, secondly if you don't mind i want to ask you the below if possible:
    1- in my cme, is there a way when i call an internal extension (e.g 110) from an internal phone it rings normally but when i call from outside-->autoattendent answers-->when i press 110 it get transferred to another phone (e.g 111)....????
    2- when i call from outside(pstn) to the cme -->when the plar command is directly to the internal extension the caller id appears but when the autoattendent answers and then transfer to the operator (by pressing zero) the caller id appears as unknown number ??????
    3- is the 3905 sip phone support 1Gbps when connected to the PC, as after connecting the phones to the PCs the speed decreased up to 100Mbps?? or it is another matter?
    (poe switches is cisco SG200)
    regards,

  • IPhone 5 drops calls as fast as my confidence in Verizon

    I've been a happy Verizon wireless subscriber for roughly the past 7 years. I've always had LG flip phones, and in that time have had perhaps 2 dropped calls. In July 2013, I upgraded to an Apple iPhone 5 16GB in black. As each day passes, and my iPhone 5 drops more and more calls, my regret about the poor choice I made in accepting Verizon's offer to upgrade, exponentially increases.
    I live in the same home as I did with all of my LG flip phones that performed flawlessly on the Verizon Network. Never was there a dropped phone call. I transmitted a great deal of data via text and picture messaging with out any significant or frequent slowdowns in speed. I never had problems in the timely receipt of my incoming texts. When I turn on either of my old LG phones and place them next to my Apple iPhone 5, they all match, showing 2 or 3 bars of service and LTE.
    Conversely, my regrettable, disappointing, and obviously flawed Apple iPhone 5 does outperform all others when it comes to call dropping dependability. I can count on my iPhone to drop 100% of the incoming and outgoing calls, 100% of the time in my bedroom and in my home office. The rest of my home is about a 70/30 crap shoot in favor of it eventually dropping the call where none were ever dropped in the prior 7 years of my Verizon service using LG phones. People will send me text messages over the span of hours, or a day, and they appear to stack up somewhere until I receive an incoming phone call which pushes all of them through at the same moment as the phone begins to ring. Never had that problem before. People will phone me, and I never hear my phone ring or receive a missed call notification. Hours later my iPhone will suddenly go off with the voice mail notification, all the while between showing 2 or 3 bars of reception when I check the phone wondering why expected calls haven't called me, yet. Short of having to walk outside, trying to have a voice conversation on my iPhone 5 reminds me of the old days, and the family having to get into those awkward "TV viewing positions" and holding old style TV antennas and aluminum foil just to get a favorite station to come in better. Thanks to my Apple iPhone 5, I have to do the same "assume the position" when trying to send any picture or large data files.
    No, I do not have a case on, or around my phone.
    Yes, I keep my iPhone 5 in the same indoor locations that worked well for LG, and have looked for other "convenient" places to locate them for potentially better reception, with no luck.
    I am located in zip code 98663.
    The 4G coverage map indicates my location is deep within Verizon's  "supposed" coverage area.
    I've done the recent IOS 7.0.4 software upgrade, and I think it got worse afterwards, if possible.
    All 3 roaming functions are enabled.
    I've tested the device in multiple places in and out of the house. It does NOT drop calls outside and data is faster, HOWEVER the iPhone continues to register the same 2 or 3 bars of reception outside as it does inside, including LTE.
    I do not power cycle daily, but I do power cycle often.
    I have tried resetting the Network Settings in the past.
    When others are in my home and are serviced by Sprint and AT&T and others, I can use their non-Apple, non-Verizon, phones, and have ZERO DROPPED CALLS indoors.
    I've been told I need one of those $250 network extenders. HAHAHAHA!!! Never had one problem in 7 years in the same house on the Verizon wireless network prior to my poor decision to accept Verizon's upgrade offer. Why, exactly, is it my responsibility to pay $250 to fix a problem that has clearly resulted from either a phone that is lacking in quality that Verizon (ironically?) "upgraded" me to into, a wireless network that is inadequately designed in my area to be compatible with some of the products Verizon sells, or both. 
    This whole nightmare has severely diminished my confidence in Verizon's commitments to both quality and customer care. I sincerely hope that this plea for help from Verizon will bring an acceptable resolution and restoration of my confidence that Verizon is still willing to defend it's once good reputation, and is the wireless provider that I should be proud to be a member of, for the rest of my life. Hate to jump ship, but if there is no loyalty towards customers, why stay?
    Thank you.

    KinquanaH_VZw:
    Thank you for the reply to my concerns.
    I have not had a trouble ticket created over this problem. Since the iPhone 5 continuously drops calls, I have not tried to call *611 from it due to the long hold times. Early on, I made several attempts from my land line to call the 800-922-0204 number for customer service. After holding for up to 20 minutes on different days of the week and at different times of the day and never reaching an agent I became frustrated and chose to live with the problem, realizing that Verizon would be of no help to me. When I finally became disgusted with the call dropping, and related poor reception issues, I decided to research the problem, read what others had experienced, how they coped, what  problems they specifically reported,  how they communicated their problems, how they were treated by Verizon, and finally what solutions were offered by Verizon, and the ability of those solutions to improve the problem to the satisfaction of the complaining/unhappy customers.
    From what I was able to dig up, it appeared that replacing the iPhone was successful in satisfying the customers issues with call dropping less than 10% of the time. Statistically speaking, I felt that replacing one iPhone for another would be a waste of my time. Besides, if I can't get through to customer service on the phone, requesting a replacement is the least of my concerns.
    You mention some other things that can affect service:
    -Location of tower - Lived in same home for almost 50 years. Unless you moved the tower the day I activated my iPhone and deactivated my LG Chocolate (which received flawless reception in my home). I doubt that is the problem.
    -Building structure - Again lived here for almost 50 years. It has not changed since the LG had flawless reception and the iPhone has been less than satisfactory.
    -Weather - In the 4 years with the LG Chocolate we had about every type of weather that is typical for this region, and never a problem. In the 6 months I've had the iPhone, the weather here has been pretty consistent and good and there is no noticeable difference to the constant call dropping.
    -Tower congestion - Admittedly there were consistent blocks of time Monday-Friday that I did notice the LG slow a bit on data transmission, and attributed it to tower congestion. However, even at minimal usage times, such as 2, or 3, or 4 AM, the iPhone still is quite reliable in it's ability to drop calls and transmit data slowly.
    In addition to the above things that can affect service, please keep this in mind, I have friends with smart phones on other networks, specifically Sprint and At&T. When they visit my home, I am quite envious of their reception, even when putting the phones side by side in worst spots in my home, theirs outperform mine in every test I have asked them humor me by doing. Other friends with Verizon smart phones that are not Apple products, receive better phone and data service/reception in my house than I do, but not as good as those with other providers.
    From the data I was able to research, customer complaints and resolutions, and comparisons of reception in my home before and after the iPhone and with other providers, I concluded this:
    Were I someday able to get through to customer service, I would be willing to jump through the hoops, as I am now, so that you can verify and collect what ever technical data you need regarding this problem.
    Ultimately, I would be offered the same choice, or two, as all others having the same problem with their iPhone as I am. Exchange it for another iPhone, which is unsuccessful about 90% of the time, and/or I should purchase at my own expense a network extender. If I, and others, had always had poor reception/service in my home, I would have no problem paying for one. Since the case is the other way around, I decided to be proactive about my feelings on having to purchase one, resulting in my plea for help on the message board.
    I do apologize for the length of my message, but I wanted to try to cover all of the potential questions that would be posed to me in an effort to look for causes that would eliminate the iPhone or the signal quality provided by Verizon of any blame.
    Anyway, I am happy to have you open a trouble ticket and to answer any questions that anyone needs to ask, and do what needs to be done to find a solution. If you were unable to locate my account through my user name or email address I will provide that information below so that you can get started. If there is anything that involves asking a lot of questions, I suggest it be done via email, as over the phone will probably even frustrate the technician or CSR who has to call me back 20 times to complete the questions due to call dropping.
    I sincerely hope that you are able to find a mutually beneficial solution to this problem.
    Thank you,
    >>Personal information removed to comply with the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service<<
    Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

  • Incoming calls issue in Third Party SIP Phone

    Hi,
    Yesterday I configured my third party sip phone which is yealink in this case on cucm and successfully registered it with cucm, despite of registration i have some calling issue in this phone. I am able to make outbound calls from this phone to any other phone however issue is related to inbound calls.I tried calling its DN from anywhere but call disconnect after sometime. Also didnt get any proper sip session trace in RTMT. Kindly suggest some step to sortout this issue.
    Thanks

    Dear Manish,
    Call normally dicsonnected after 30-40 sec with termination code 102 in session trace. PFB SDI  trace with 5030 is Thirdparty sip phone and 5033 is c7945. Looking forward for your suggestion.
    CallingPartyNumber=5033
    |DialingPartition=
    |DialingPattern=5030
    |FullyQualifiedCalledPartyNumber=5030
    |DialingPatternRegularExpression=(5030)
    |DialingWhere=
    |PatternType=Enterprise
    |PotentialMatches=NoPotentialMatchesExist
    |DialingSdlProcessId=(0,0,0)
    |PretransformDigitString=5030
    |PretransformTagsList=SUBSCRIBER
    |PretransformPositionalMatchList=5030
    |CollectedDigits=5030
    |UnconsumedDigits=
    |TagsList=SUBSCRIBER
    |PositionalMatchList=5030
    |VoiceMailbox=
    |VoiceMailCallingSearchSpace=PT-LHR-LOCAL:PT-Local:Unityvmpt:PT-F6-Local:PT-ISL-LOCAL:PT-KHI-LOCAL:PT_Operator_LHR:PT_Operator_KHI:PT_Operator_ISL
    |VoiceMailPilotNumber=7103
    |RouteBlockFlag=RouteThisPattern
    |RouteBlockCause=0
    |AlertingName=Syed Ahmer
    |UnicodeDisplayName=Syed Ahmer
    |DisplayNameLocale=1
    |OverlapSendingFlagEnabled=0
    12:17:38.028 |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP UDP message to 172.16.200.21:[5062]:
    [23928282,NET]
    INVITE sip:[email protected]:5062 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.100.200.11:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1ca0cc6e317649
    From: "Syed Ahmer" ;tag=8787406~039e2a80-8561-4586-8954-d01ed2aa12c8-246211918
    To:
    Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:17:38 GMT
    Call-ID: [email protected]
    Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
    Min-SE:  1800
    User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM8.5
    Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
    CSeq: 101 INVITE
    Expires: 180
    Allow-Events: presence
    Send-Info: conference, x-cisco-conference
    Alert-Info:
    Contact:
    Remote-Party-ID: "Syed Ahmer" ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
    Max-Forwards: 70
    Content-Length: 0
    |14,100,50,1.14103336^10.163.14.4^SEP00230432C828
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal() varId = 0|14,100,50,1.14103336^10.163.14.4^SEP00230432C828
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpHandler::fireSignal - SEND: index = 0, handler = 0xaf299320|*^*^*
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpPort::fireSignal - SEND, destination = 172.16.200.21:5062|*^*^*
    12:17:38.028 |EnvProcessUdpPort - EnvProcessUdpHandler::send(buff, 850, 172.16.200.21:5062)|*^*^*

  • UCCX drops calls

    Hi,
    We use UCCX 5.0.2 and CUCM 6.1.2.
    Several times a day some calls are dropped as soon as the agent picks up the call.
    If i do a debug isdn q931, I see that call was disconnected from the side of agent. Am I right?
    But agent doesn't drop that call.
    How can I resolve this problem?
    ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x813E
    <009>Channel ID i = 0xA98389
    <009><009>Exclusive, Channel 9
    ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX -> ALERTING pd = 8  callref = 0x813E
    <009>Facility i = 0x9FAA06800100820100A10B0201010201018003495652
    <009>Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available
    ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x813E
    <009>Facility i = 0x9FAA06800100820100A10B0201020201028003495652
    <009>Connected Number i = 0x0081, '1502'
    .Oct 20 12:13:53: ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: RX <- CONNECT_ACK pd = 8  callref = 0x013E
    .Oct 20 12:13:53: ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX -> FACILITY pd = 8  callref = 0x813C
    <009>Facility i = 0x9FAA06800100820100A11A0202D39902010C30110A0100A0098004313835320A01010A0100
    ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x8134
    <009>Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing
    ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x0134
    ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 0x8134

    Graham, We use g711 codec and have two regions, but in this call only one region takes part(with g711).
    I noticed that some day it happens with one agent most of all, someday with another agent..
    Logs from CAD of agent:
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1883 GetDebugInfo --------------------- Begin: AGENT_STATE_EVENT ---------------------
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1937 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: MonitorID is 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1938 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: AgentState is TALKING
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1939 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: NextAgentState is AVAILABLE
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1940 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: SkillGroupStateElement is 4
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1941 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: StateDurationElement is 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1942 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: SkillGroupNumberElement is -1
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1943 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: SkillGroupIDElement is -1
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1944 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: SkillGroupPriorityElement is 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1945 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: EventReasonCodeElement is 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1946 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: AgentIDElement is EREG-24
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1947 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: AgentExtensionElement is 1854
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1948 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: AgentInstrumentElement is (null)
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1949 AGENT_STATE_EVENT: AgentID_LongElement is EREG-24
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2195 GetDebugInfo --------------------- End: AGENT_STATE_EVENT ---------------------
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1815 AgentState TALKING NextAgentState AVAILABLE
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0177 StateCallback - CallID:0, CallState:AS_INSESSIONPENDING_READY
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0255 Begin ProcessEvent, CallID:0, CallState:AS_INSESSIONPENDING_READY
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: ASM0212 Begin handling agent state event - AS_INSESSIONPENDING_READY with reason code 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: ASM0273 Update StatusBar text with agent state: Talking
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: CChatAPI::SetAgentAcdState for Ext-1854|State-2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClient::setAgentAcdState: Begin.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClient::setAgentAcdState: Begin. Ext: 1854, agentState: Unknown, stateTransitionMask: 590021, reasonCode: .
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClient::setAgentAcdState: Calling the server IDL setAgentAcdState function.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClient::setAgentAcdState: End. return_code: 0.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: ASM0497 Begin writing agent state data to RASCAL
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: ASM0683 Sending AS_SELECTED agent state change to RASCAL with GID=1319774680
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: ASM0747 End writing agent state data to RASCAL
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: ASM0425 End handling agent state event - AS_INSESSIONPENDING_READY
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: VCL0249 Begin update for callID 0 with call state AS_INSESSIONPENDING_READY and new callID 0.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: VCL0259 CallID is empty - nothing to update - returning.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0738 End ProcessEvent, CallID:0, CallState:AS_INSESSIONPENDING_READY
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1883 GetDebugInfo --------------------- Begin: CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT ---------------------
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2037 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: MonitorID = 1854
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2038 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: ConnectionCallID = 23041381
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2039 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: LocalConnectionState = LCS_NONE
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2040 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: EventCause = CEC_REDIRECTED
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2041 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: ReleasingDeviceID = 1550
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.286 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2195 GetDebugInfo --------------------- End: CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT ---------------------
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: MF2813 User clicked ANSWER/DROP button
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: MF2857 User clicked DROP button
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1298 Drop: Success to Drop call to callID 23041381. InvokeID 146
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] STCPClient::Receive: bytesRead = 8, bytesReceived/bytesExpected = 8/8
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] STCPClient::Receive: bytesRead = 4, bytesReceived/bytesExpected = 4/4
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] PhoneDev: PD0440 HandleMesgFunc: Posting WM_ACMIEVENT
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] STCPClient::Receive: bytesRead = 8, bytesReceived/bytesExpected = 8/8
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] STCPClient::Receive: bytesRead = 36, bytesReceived/bytesExpected = 36/36
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] PhoneDev: PD0440 HandleMesgFunc: Posting WM_ACMIEVENT
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] STCPClient::Receive: bytesRead = 8, bytesReceived/bytesExpected = 8/8
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] STCPClient::Receive: bytesRead = 85, bytesReceived/bytesExpected = 85/85
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.739 DEBUG [0x47c] PhoneDev: PD0440 HandleMesgFunc: Posting WM_ACMIEVENT
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD1883 GetDebugInfo --------------------- Begin: CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT ---------------------
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2037 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: MonitorID = 1854
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2038 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: ConnectionCallID = 23041381
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2039 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: LocalConnectionState = LCS_NONE
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2040 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: EventCause = CEC_NONE
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2041 CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT: ReleasingDeviceID = 1854
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] PhoneDev: PD2195 GetDebugInfo --------------------- End: CALL_CONNECTION_CLEARED_EVENT ---------------------
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0177 StateCallback - CallID:23041381, CallState:CS_DISCONNECTED
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0255 Begin ProcessEvent, CallID:23041381, CallState:CS_DISCONNECTED
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: CChatAPI::ChangeCallStatus for this party: Ext-1854|Type-2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::tpCallStatus: Begin.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::tpCallStatus: Begin. ext: 1854, userType: Agent, userName: 1854, callID: 23041381, callState: Inactive, duration: 0, direction: Inbound, SkillGroup: .
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::tpCallStatus: Calling the server IDL callStatus function.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::updateCallIDMap: Call state is inactive. Deleting the call party from the call list.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::updateCallIDMap: call id <23041381>:
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::updateCallIDMap: party 1854;
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::updateCallIDMap: .
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::updateCallIDMap: remove call party <1854> from call list.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::updateCallIDMap: No party on this call, delete the call from call list.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] FCCClientAPI::tpCallStatus: End. return_code: 0.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0592 Process Event - Delete the appearance for CallID:23041381, CallState:CS_DISCONNECTED
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW1746 Sending call data to RASCAL with GID=83690280
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW1106 Entering CheckCallStateRules
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW1172 Entering CheckEventRules
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AP1240 Rule: , Event Name: Dropped
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW1285 Leaving CheckEventRules
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW1163 Leaving CheckCallStateRules
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0967 Entering DeleteAppearance, pos = 4F39FAC
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW1045 Leaving DeleteAppearance
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: TF0120 New Event : CS_DISCONNECTED with CallID 23041381 and NewCallID 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: TF0177 Retaining call data on disconnect for CallID 23041381
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: TF0292 Raw Enterprise Data for CallID[23041381]: ANI
    3832181278
    255
    DNIS
    3998
    254
    Layout
    default
    252
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: TF0254 Raw Call Activity Data for CallID[23041381]: 3998,Route Point 3998,9,1319777924,1319777924,1319777924|4,ER_CSQ,10,0,1319777938,0|1854,EREG-24 ,2,1319777938,0,0|
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: CV0693 About to display data...
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: CV0845 Found timer for CallID 23041381
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: CV0876 Deleted timer to list for CallID 23041381
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: VCL0249 Begin update for callID 23041381 with call state CS_DISCONNECTED and new callID 0.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: VCL0309 No appearance data found for callID 23041381, checking to see if call in list needs to be deleted.
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: VCL0321 Deleted Call ID:23041381 from list (Row:0)
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0872 CLayoutManager::VoiceContactListHide current height is 38
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0416 CLayoutManager::ShrinkMainWindow current height is 76
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0417 CLayoutManager::ShrinkMainWindow reqeusted change in height is 38
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0542 CLayoutManager::ShrinkMainWindow new height is now 38
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0544 CLayoutManager::ShrinkMainWindow height will not be locked
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0548 CLayoutManager::ShrinkMainWindow covered height is 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0549 CLayoutManager::ShrinkMainWindow locked height is 0
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: LM0550 CLayoutManager::ShrinkMainWindow new height is 38
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: VCL0343 Update completed with no appearances left - returning
    2011-10-28 12:02:04.755 DEBUG [0x9e8] Agent: AW0738 End ProcessEvent, CallID:23041381, CallState:CS_DISCONNECTED
    It looks like agent clicks drop, but agent doesn't do it.
    After th logout and login of CAD it helps for approximately an hour, and then dropped calls appear again.
    In MIVR there is first CLEAR_CONNECTION_REQ from connectionDeviceId: 1854 too.
    166342872: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-ICD_CTI-7-UNK:ClientConnMgr: Processing msg on socket:Socket[addr=10.205.3.32,port=56077,localport=42027] Msg is {length=28 type=CLEAR_CONNECTION_REQ,invokeId=65, peripheralId:1, connectionCallId:23015022, connectionDeviceIdType: 0, connectionDeviceId: 1854, agentInstrument: 1854 }
    166342873: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:Processing msg: CTIClearConnectionReqMsg CTIMgrTPCCReqMsg Socket:Socket[addr=10.205.3.32,port=56077,localport=42027] invokeID:65, peripheralId:1, connectionCallId:23015022, connectionDeviceIdType: 0, connectionDeviceId: 1854, agentInstrument: 1854
    166342874: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:TPCCRegMsgHandler.getRmCmCallContact: agent ext - 1854 callId - 23015022
    166342875: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-ICD_CTI-7-UNK:OutboundMsgProcessor: got message: { CLEAR_CONNECTION_CONF }
    166342876: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:RIMgrAddressCallObserver: TermConnDroppedEv received for call 23015022 [6237806/1] and agent EREG-24
    166342877: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-ICD_CTI-7-UNK:OutboundMessageprocessor : sending msg : { length=-1 type=CLEAR_CONNECTION_CONF,invokeId=65 to socket: Socket[addr=10.205.3.32,port=56077,localport=42027] }
    166342878: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_CM-7-UNK:ContactMgr.getRmCmContact(6237806/1) returns 23015022 [6237806/1]
    166342879: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:classifyCall: 6237806/1 1854
    166342880: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:RmCm contact 23015022 [6237806/1] has internal type IAQ, contact type: IAQ for agent EREG-24
    166342881: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-ICD_CTI-7-UNK:MsgHandler : Sent : { CLEAR_CONNECTION_CONF to Socket[addr=10.205.3.32,port=56077,localport=42027] }
    166342882: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:classifyCall 6237806/1 Rsrc: EREG-24 CallingAddr: 1548 LRAddr:1548 Type:IAQ(Normal)
    166342883: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:RIMgrAddressCallObserver: CallInvalidEv received for call:23015022 [6237806/1]
    166342884: Oct 27 11:40:21.296 NOVST %MIVR-SS_RM-7-UNK:Processing msg: SessionTerminatedMsg (Rsrc:EREG-24 ID:6237806/1 Type:IAQ Cause:DROPPED Abort Exception:null)
    I can't find any reason for this behavior..:(

  • Video call from Cisco 8945 SCCP to Polycom VVX 1500 Third party Sip Phones between intercluster trunks is not working

    Dear All,
                   We have two cucm Clusters in Different Locations between that clusters i created
    Inter-Cluster Trunk (Non-Gatekeeper Controlled) Now all are working fine Between Clusters
    audio calls & Video calls between sccp 8945 phones  , but iam facing a Problem with third party
    Video Phones (Polycom VVX 1500 ) Third Party SIP Phones located in second cluster, From 1 st cluster cisco 8945 Video
    phone to  2nd cluster Polycom Video phone all calls are works for voice call only, but no video ,
    Please Suggest me Solution.
    Thank you,
    Sriman

    Try setting up a SIP trunk between the two clusters and set a route patten just to the VVX 1500 and check how that goes. 
    From memory inter-cluster trunks are a H.323 like protocol which might have video inter-op issues with the Polycom device.

Maybe you are looking for