Cumulative ratio

Hi,
is it possible create a cumulative ratio (infoobject)?
In bex, i'd like to see the results like the following example. The cumulativegks columns is the sum of column values kgs:
year               kgs     cumulativekgs
2008              140     140
2009              138      278
2010              46        324
Total              324      324
Thanks in advance.
Regards

yes but, when begins a new year the most logical is that the first year of the new year has the cumulative quantity of the before year. In my example, Kgs Ac (cumulative columns) should be 36.000 + 9000 = 45.000 in ENE 2010, isn't it?
In the properties of key figure i've checked Cumulative and Results also apply to, both properties. Is is possible to achieve what i explain?
Año natural     Año natural/Mes     Kgs                    Kgs Ac
2009     NOV 2009                          18.000                          18.000
     DIC 2009                          18.000                          36.000
     Resultado                          36.000                          36.000
2010     ENE 2010                          9.000                          9.000
     FEB 2010                          18.000                          27.000
     Resultado                          27.000                          63.000
                     Resultado total                   63.000                          63.000

Similar Messages

WebI Report using YTD expression causes MDDataSetBW.GetCellData error

Hello everyone
We are using BusinessObjects XI 3.1 FP 1.8 on OS AIX 5.3 and we are obtaining information from SAP BI 7.0 Patch Level 19. We are using the Integration Kit for SAP Solutions.
We are developing a report in which we are trying to create a Year to Date cumulative ratio in a universe connected to a BI multiprovider, we are using the next expression:
<EXPRESSION>SUM(YTD(@Select(RatiosNúmero de Equipos Instalados)))</EXPRESSION>
When we check the integrity and grammar in the universe is OK.
But if we export the universe and try to use the variable in the WebIntelligence report, we got the next error:
u201CAn error in the database was produced. The database error text is: Error of MDDataSetBW.GetCellData. (WIS 10901)u201D
Thanks in advance for your help!
Edited by: Azucena de los Angeles Coronel Castañeda on Oct 8, 2009 11:00 AM

Hi,
whats the exepcted data volume ?
how may elements did you include into the Web Intelligence Query Panel ?
Ingo

BEx - Adding a cumulated column

Hi all,
I need to design a report like below, in line I have what is drilled down like material, plant, ....
WEEK 1--|WEEK 2|WEEK 2--
|....
Delivered | Total delivered | Delivered | Total delivered | Delivered | Total delivered |...
Material 1 |---100-|100|--50--|150|200--|---350--
|...
Material 2 |---200-|200|--50--|250|---0---|---350--
|...
I saw many subjects about that kind of problem but in that specific case I cannot use the SUMCT, SUMGT and/or SUMRT in a formula because the calculation is done according to the line and not the columns like I need.
I tried in ratio properties the "cumulated" option. Even if it looks fine it doesn't work since I need to do calculations for other ratios with the "Total delivered" column.
If you have any idea, you're welcome ;o)
Many thanks,
Corentin.

In fact I have 5 ratios per week. I think I could create 5x52 restricted key figures; but that would an ugly job ;o)
I believe I'll have to create this ratio in the cube and find the proper way to update this new KF.
Many thanks.

Performance Hit Ratios

Hi
I would like calculate the following hit ratios against my instance performance metrics
1.Buffer Cache Hit %
2.Library Cache Hit %
3.Redo No Wait %
4.Memory Sort %
5.Soft Parse %
6.Commit %
And I need to know what would be the optimal values against this hit ratio for 900 GB database with Aix 5.3 platform.
if i dont have optimal values with query results. What are all the parameter should i need to tune and how much i need to tune?
Kindly help me on this.
Thanks
Ranga

V$PGASTAT
This view gives instance-level statistics on the PGA memory usage and the automatic PGA memory manager. For example:
SELECT * FROM V$PGASTAT;
The output of this query might look like the following:
NAME VALUE UNIT
aggregate PGA target parameter 41156608 bytes
aggregate PGA auto target 21823488 bytes
global memory bound 2057216 bytes
total PGA inuse 16899072 bytes
total PGA allocated 35014656 bytes
maximum PGA allocated 136795136 bytes
total freeable PGA memory 524288 bytes
PGA memory freed back to OS 1713242112 bytes
total PGA used for auto workareas 0 bytes
maximum PGA used for auto workareas 2383872 bytes
total PGA used for manual workareas 0 bytes
maximum PGA used for manual workareas 8470528 bytes
over allocation count 291
bytes processed 2124600320 bytes
extra bytes read/written 39949312 bytes
cache hit percentage 98.15 percent
The main statistics displayed in V$PGASTAT are as follows:
aggregate PGA target parameter: This is the current value of the initialization parameter PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET. The default value is 20% of the SGA size. If you set this parameter to 0, automatic management of the PGA memory is disabled.
aggregate PGA auto target: This gives the amount of PGA memory Oracle can use for work areas running in automatic mode. This amount is dynamically derived from the value of the parameter PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET and the current work area workload. Hence, it is continuously adjusted by Oracle. If this value is small compared to the value of PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET, then a lot of PGA memory is used by other components of the system (for example, PL/SQL or Java memory) and little is left for sort work areas. You must ensure that enough PGA memory is left for work areas running in automatic mode.
global memory bound: This gives the maximum size of a work area executed in AUTO mode. This value is continuously adjusted by Oracle to reflect the current state of the work area workload. The global memory bound generally decreases when the number of active work areas is increasing in the system. As a rule of thumb, the value of the global bound should not decrease to less than one megabyte. If it does, then the value of PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET should probably be increased.
total PGA allocated: This gives the current amount of PGA memory allocated by the instance. Oracle tries to keep this number less than the value of PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET. However, it is possible for the PGA allocated to exceed that value by a small percentage and for a short period of time, when the work area workload is increasing very rapidly or when the initialization parameter PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET is set to a too small value.
total freeable PGA memory: This indicates how much allocated PGA memory which can be freed.
total PGA used for auto workareas: This indicates how much PGA memory is currently consumed by work areas running under automatic memory management mode. This number can be used to determine how much memory is consumed by other consumers of the PGA memory (for example, PL/SQL or Java):
PGA other = total PGA allocated - total PGA used for auto workareas
over allocation count: This statistic is cumulative from instance start-up. Over-allocating PGA memory can happen if the value of PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET is too small to accommodate the PGA other component in the previous equation plus the minimum memory required to execute the work area workload. When this happens, Oracle cannot honor the initialization parameter PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET, and extra PGA memory needs to be allocated. If over-allocation occurs, you should increase the value of PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET using the information provided by the advice view V$PGA_TARGET_ADVICE.
total bytes processed: This is the number of bytes processed by memory-intensive SQL operators since instance start-up. For example, the number of byte processed is the input size for a sort operation. This number is used to compute the cache hit percentage metric.
extra bytes read/written: When a work area cannot run optimally, one or more extra passes is performed over the input data. extra bytes read/written represents the number of bytes processed during these extra passes since instance start-up. This number is also used to compute the cache hit percentage. Ideally, it should be small compared to total bytes processed.
cache hit percentage: This metric is computed by Oracle to reflect the performance of the PGA memory component. It is cumulative from instance start-up. A value of 100% means that all work areas executed by the system since instance start-up have used an optimal amount of PGA memory. This is, of course, ideal but rarely happens except maybe for pure OLTP systems. In reality, some work areas run one-pass or even multi-pass, depending on the overall size of the PGA memory. When a work area cannot run optimally, one or more extra passes is performed over the input data. This reduces the cache hit percentage in proportion to the size of the input data and the number of extra passes performed. Example 7-3 shows how cache hit percentage is affected by extra passes.

What are the ideal specs for a DigiBeta master tape when authoring a "widescreen anamorphic" 16:9 SD DVD (original aspect ratio is 14:9)?

I just received the masters for a new SD DVD. I would like to author a "widescreen anamorphic" SD DVD horizontally squeezed widescreen image stored in a standard 4:3 aspect ratio DVD image frame. (On 4:3 displays, mattes should preserve the original aspect ratio. On 16:9 displays the image will fill the screen at the highest possible resolution.)
Below I've listed the specs of the Digi Beta master tapes the producers have sent to me for digitizing. I'd like to know this: What are the ideal specs for a DigiBeta master tape when authoring a widescreen anamorphic SD DVD, using material with an original aspect ratio of 14:9?
I've also listed my guesses below. Please let me know if my guesses are right. If not, please suggest alternatives (and if possible explain why.)
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF EXISTING MASTER:
Tape: DigiBeta
Original Aspect Ratio: 1.55 (14:9)
Vid Rate: 29.97 fps
Pixel Aspect: NTSC - CCIR 601
Frame Size: 720 x 480
Anamorphic: Full-Height Anamorphic (16:9 image displayed in letterboxed, non-distored 4:3)
Display Format: 4:3 Letterbox
MY GUESS AT IDEAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (for a DigiBeta, that is):
Tape: DigiBeta
Original Aspect Ratio: 1.55 (14:9)
Vid Rate: 29.97 fps
Pixel Aspect: Square
Frame Size: 720 x 540
Anamorphic: YES
Display Format: 16:9 Anamorphic (horizontally squeezed widescreen image)
Please feel free to ask for clarification or further information you need to answer my question.
Thank you so much in advance for your help!
Best, Noetical.
BTW, I can't wait for the day when everything has gone digital and we get digital intermediates instead of tapes to digitize!

Hi Nick...thanks for taking the time to reply to my question.
Nick Holmes wrote:
What you have there is a mess.
NTSC pixels are never square.
NTSC is 720x486, even when it is Anamorphic.
You shouldn't be using an already letterboxed master to make an Anamorphic version. Get the master that was made before the letterboxing stage.
When you make an Anamorphic DVD it should display as 16:9 full screen automatically on widescreen TVs.
The same DVD will automatically letterbox on 4:3 TVs.
Um yeah...duh. That's exactly what I was trying to explain in the preface of my question. I'm sorry if I didn't make it clear...all these things you mention are the reasons I'm putting together a list of the technical specs of the DigiBeta I need so I can have them send that instead of the stupid letterboxed version.
Look, I'm sending this request to some intern at their offices in England, asking for a master with which I can make an Anamorphic DVD. They already sent me this master, which as you and I both agree is an idiotic asset to use for these purposes. As such, I was hoping for advice on a more precise way of requesting the master that I need than asking for "the master that was made before the letterboxing stage." Upon reflection, perhaps I'll just do that. If you or anyone else has a suggestion about something I should add to my request that would improve the odds of them sending the tape I need, please repond. Thank you!
BTW, It's been a long time since anyone has responded to something I've written or said as though I'm an idiot. I remember now that I don't really like it. (Moving along...)

XML file from '08 has a different aspect ratio in FCP 6?

I have the new canon vixia hg 21 which is avchd and FCP 6 isn't recognizing it. Using Imovie to recognize the files works fine, the problem is that when you export from imovie '08 into FCP via xml, it imports fine, but I get a display issue with black bars surrounding the footage, only in the canvas. It appears fine in the viewer and in it's own sequence in the timeline. But when you mix the different camera footage together, the other being the Canon XH A1, it appears as a different aspect ratio??? What the? and for the life of me, I've re imported using 16:9, no difference...I have no idea what's going on.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

You should really take this to the Final Cut Pro forum as the codecs and the interface is different for Final Cut Express.

Non-cumulative Values not showing in Inventory Management Queries

Hi:
Has anyone had a problem with the new version and Non-cumulative key figures not showing up in Bex for Inventory Managemet reports? Specifically, they showed and validated back to ECC for our Development and QA boxes but now in our Regression box they are all showing zeros. Our Cumulative values are all showing correctly still within the Regression box. For example, Total Receipts and Total Issues are correctly poplating values but Total Stock is not.
I have checked and validate that the configuration in the Regression box matches or Dev and QA box.

Found the problem. It had to do with the compression variant in the delta process chain. The compression was set to 'no marker update'. Since we only started receiving measureable deltas in or regression box this is where the incorrect setting showed up. Reinitalized and the deltas are working correctly now.

Video pixel ratio in Adobe Bridge CS3

How do I get the video Pixel Ratio to show in Bridge CS3? I went to preference and it is already checked. But, I can't seem to figure out how it show in the metadata tab. Thanks for your help.
Perry

In the Find box the Match drop down has 2 options. "If all criteria is met" is like "and" while "if any criteria met" is like "or" logic.

Query help, Percentages / ratio to reports / nests

Hi
I have a query that returns data like this
D_NO POINTS COUNT_POINTS ID_COUNT
4002 L_T_69 12 282
4219 L_T_69 1 151
4228 L_T_69 18 193
4229 L_T_69 7 181
4230 L_T_69 0 197
I need to also output a column that works out a percentage of count_points and Id_count. e.g 12/282 * 100 = 4.2
I had a try with ratio to reports function but no joy for me. I think i need to add in
another nested select or something but what i was trying wasnt working.
Can anyone help.
here is the query so far
SELECT D_NO,
GROUPS.POINTS,
DECODE(GROUPS.POINTS, 'L_T_69' , L_T_69) AS COUNT_POINTS,
ID_COUNT
FROM
     (SELECT D_NO,
     Count (CASE WHEN VERBAL <= 69 THEN 1
          END) AS L_T_69,
     COUNT(ID_NUMBER) AS ID_COUNT
     FROM TBL_1
     WHERE VERBAL IS NOT NULL
     group by D_NO)
TBL_1,
( SELECT 'L_T_69' POINTS FROM DUAL )GROUPS
thank you

Not sure if this is what you're looking for but it may give you some clues:
select object_type
      ,has_a_c
      ,type_total
      ,round(100 * (has_a_c / type_total),2) ratio
from
   select object_type
         ,sum (case when instr(object_name,'C') <> 0 then 1
                    else 0
               end) has_a_c
         ,count(*) type_total
   from   all_objects
   group by object_type
OBJECT_TYPE          HAS_A_C   TYPE_TOTAL   RATIO
CONSUMER GROUP             1            2      50
EVALUATION CONTEXT         1            1     100
FUNCTION                  50          113   44.25
INDEX                      7           20      35
LIBRARY                    0            2       0
OPERATOR                   1            2      50
PACKAGE                  500         1158   43.18
PACKAGE BODY             487         1126   43.25
PROCEDURE                 54           86   62.79
SEQUENCE                  62          116   53.45
SYNONYM                 1060         2298   46.13
TABLE                    365          721   50.62
TABLE PARTITION           15           15     100
TYPE                     104          272   38.24
VIEW                     834         1896   43.99
15 rows selected.

In normal view, half the page disappears off right of screen. in full screen this does not happen. what can be done to correct the screen ratio for normal screen?

version 5 loaded on windows 7. all went well for a while. one day while using, ratio of normal screen doubled in width; i.e. half the page disappears off the screen to the right (on a wide screen). when full screen mode applied, ratio is fine. it only happens in normal view, which is the usually prefered option. I cannot determine any means within the program to resize the normal screen. nothing else is affected, only mozilla firefox in normal view. not that when program is opened from keyboard the page is correct for a moment, then enlarges the width with 1/2 page dissappearing.

This issue can be caused by the Babylon Toolbar 1.1.8 extension
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode

How to fix an error in sequnece setting (aspect ratio)?

Hi,
I have been working for a while on a project in CS4. I have created a sequence in it with an aspect ratio (AR) of 4:3 - worked for hours on it - but I should had the sequence created instead in 16:9. I realised it a bit too late...
So how do I fix it?
Apparently amending the sequence setting for AR cannot be done - please let me know if there is any way of doing this.
Someone suggested editing the PRPROJ file of the project - but when I opened it I was unable to detect under the sequence name (I found a few entries with it) where I can easily change the sequence to 16:9.
So then I found people suggesting I copy/paste all the assets from the sequence into a new one that is correctly configured with 16:9. When I did this - CTRL+A and Copy, then paste into a new sequence in the same project - it copied all the clips and I think also all the transitions. But the key element that it did not copy over were all the changes I have done to the sound - I have been editing via the sound mixer (in Write mode) the sound, and then also made changes to the master track volume levels. These were not copied over.
I really don't want to have to do the mixing all over again. If someone can explain how I can fix the problem in any way I would be most thankful.
While I am here asking - another 2 small questions that have been bugging me:
How I can copy and paste volume keyframes from either the master track or a clip and apply it on another clip/section of the clip that would be very helpful. This would for example be useful if I am able to find a certain volume level that I would like to apply to the desired section without the need to sit and "record" (using the Write function) those settings on the desired area. If there is any means to apply the properties on audio track this way - that would be really useful and time saving.
A best practice hint: when you try and create a sound level for a project - what PC volume level setting do you set in your PC that you use as a benchmark by which we then work out the sound level that would be created in the project? Obviously if I push my PC volume al the way up I would probably mix my sound in the project too low. And if I set the PC volume too low - than I would probably be setting the overall sound level too high and get distortion. As the movies I created would be burnt onto a DVD - what is the volume level on the PC (if there is any means of establishing a standard volume) that I need to match first before I go and figure out what level of sound the finished DVD would have? Of course I can work on say a 50% and then apply gains and volume increases based on that 50% of the max sound my PC plays out. But that sounds pretty much like a random setting and not optimised for other devices.
My system:
Windows 7, 32-bit
CS4, v. 4.2.1
This looks like a fairly basic question but I am unable to find a good answer to it...
Many thanks to the person who shows me how this can be done without me going crazy over the need to start all over again...
Eroka00

Hi Ann,
Your tip saved me a lot of time indeed....!
So I created a new sequence, made sure it was 16:9, copy pasted all of the assets, but then had to do the following:
1. Copy/Paste Attributes for all the video clips (these do not transfer);
2. As you suggested used the whole of the old sequence as a nested sequence in the new one, eliminating the video altogether.
I still had a nagging issue that the project would not render or export well - but that turned out to be an issue with rendeiring large files (the video was an uncut clip of almost 10GB, andother of 6GB). Splicing these into 10 minute segments and rendering them separately did the trick.
It's ben amlong Xmas weekend and endless hours spendt on this project. Yaikes!
Thanks for the workaround idea!

Neo2 Platnum - memory ratio issues, please help!

hey all
very strang stuff...
just got a 3200+ winchester .90 CPU, its nice. also have 2x twinx corsair 3200 non LL ram.
idea: I had in mind that since my ram doesnt OC very well (220 max) I was going to get the neo2 and play with the FSB and set the ratio of the ram to 166 or something so that I could up the FSB which would in turn up the ram to around 200 or a bit over. thats the idea anyways...
result: initially I could not even post with this ram, had to flash to 1.3 but now it works. when I try to set the ram to 166 and start upping the fsb, I can get to around 220 fine. any more than 225 and I cant post... huh??? the ram is only running at 183 or so mhz at this point so I know its not that. I raised the voltage of both the cpu and ram to 10% and 2.80v and still had same problem...
ok, so I thought I would just change the fsb to 133... well again around 225 or so I cant post... ram is running at 150 only then, so definately not ram. I am lowering the HT to 4x and 3x and still no difference..
my last resort was 100mhz.... well oddly enough, when I set the ram to 100 I can up the FSB to 270 and it posts! I can boot windows at 260 fine, cpu is 2600 and ram is 133 at that point... well the ram doesnt bench too good there obviously, like 3100 in sandra.
the only other thing I could thing of was upping the FSB as high as I could go to get the ram up there and lower the cpu multi while leaving the ram at 100... I was able to get it up to 300 which the ram runs at 150 and booted into windows. but zcup said that HT was running at 300mhz... when I tried to up it from 3x to 4x it posted all weird, so I dont really want to stay at that level...
anyone else had issues changing the ratio?? I tried 1.37 with the same result.
facts: in 1:1 I can run up to 220 and boot windows, so ram runs fine at 220
: the CPU runs fine at 2.6ghz so the cpu is ok
the only conclusion I can come to is that the motherboard is wacked out.. I think the bios is crummy or something. I cant afford new ram; I only wish I could change the multi on the CPU!! waaaaaa
any thought are appreciated

Try reposting in the Overclocking forum, and include your complete system specs in your signature.

Neo2 Memory ratio issues, please read

hey all
very strang stuff...
just got a 3200+ winchester .90 CPU, its nice. also have 2x twinx corsair 3200 non LL ram.
idea: I had in mind that since my ram doesnt OC very well (220 max) I was going to get the neo2 and play with the FSB and set the ratio of the ram to 166 or something so that I could up the FSB which would in turn up the ram to around 200 or a bit over. thats the idea anyways...
result: initially I could not even post with this ram, had to flash to 1.3 but now it works. when I try to set the ram to 166 and start upping the fsb, I can get to around 220 fine. any more than 225 and I cant post... huh??? the ram is only running at 183 or so mhz at this point so I know its not that. I raised the voltage of both the cpu and ram to 10% and 2.80v and still had same problem...
ok, so I thought I would just change the fsb to 133... well again around 225 or so I cant post... ram is running at 150 only then, so definately not ram. I am lowering the HT to 4x and 3x and still no difference..
my last resort was 100mhz.... well oddly enough, when I set the ram to 100 I can up the FSB to 270 and it posts! I can boot windows at 260 fine, cpu is 2600 and ram is 133 at that point... well the ram doesnt bench too good there obviously, like 3100 in sandra.
the only other thing I could thing of was upping the FSB as high as I could go to get the ram up there and lower the cpu multi while leaving the ram at 100... I was able to get it up to 300 which the ram runs at 150 and booted into windows. but zcup said that HT was running at 300mhz... when I tried to up it from 3x to 4x it posted all weird, so I dont really want to stay at that level...
anyone else had issues changing the ratio?? I tried 1.37 with the same result.
facts: in 1:1 I can run up to 220 and boot windows, so ram runs fine at 220
: the CPU runs fine at 2.6ghz so the cpu is ok
the only conclusion I can come to is that the motherboard is wacked out.. I think the bios is crummy or something. I cant afford new ram; I just want to be able to change the ratio to 166 and have it work, is this too much to ask?
Should I RMA the board?

I use an Antec TruPower and that is hindering my performance right now.
If its your ram that is failing use memtest to see at what speed it's failing. I started at (1:1) at 2.0 Ghz dropped the multi to 9 and slowly raised the fsb until memtest would give me errors. After finding a setting that was error free i then ran prime95 to see if it was really stable. I haven't been able to run 1:1 but i do hit 2.5Ghz without any memtest or prime95 errors.
"the only other thing I could thing of was upping the FSB as high as I could go to get the ram up there and lower the cpu multi while leaving the ram at 100... I was able to get it up to 300 which the ram runs at 150 and booted into windows. but zcup said that HT was running at 300mhz... when I tried to up it from 3x to 4x it posted all weird, so I dont really want to stay at that level..."
You were running HT at 300 and tried to go from x3 to x4? I don't remember the exact number but you can't go over 1020-1040 on HT.
Edit: finally... (1:1), now just gotta test for hours on prime95...ugh.

Aggregates on Non-cumulative InfoCubes, stock key figures, stock, stocks,

Hi..Guru's
Please let me know if anybody has created aggregates on Non-Cumulative Cubes or key figure (i.e. 0IC_C03 Inventory Management.)
I am facing the problem of performance related at the time of execution of query in 0IC_C03.( runtime dump )
I have tried lot on to create aggregate by using proposal from query and other options. But its not working or using that aggr by query.
Can somebody tell me about any sample aggr. which they are using on 0ic_c03.
Or any tool to get better performance to execute query of the said cube.
One more clarification req that what is Move the Marker pointer for stock calculation. I have compressed only two inital data loading req. should I compress the all req in cube (Regularly)
If so there would be any option to get req compress automatically after successfully load in data target.
We are using all three data sources 2lis_03_bx,bf & um for the same.
Regards,
Navin

Hi,
Definately the compression has lot of effect on the quey execution time for Inventory cubes <b>than</b> other cumulated cubes.
So Do compression reqularly, once you feel that the deletion of request is not needed any more.
And ,If the query do not has calday characterstic and need only month characterstic ,use Snap shot Info cube(which is mentioned and procedure is given in How to paper) and divert the month wise(and higher granularity on time characterstic ,like quarter & year) queries to this cube.
And, the percentage of improvement in qury execution time in case of aggregates is less for non cumulated cubes when compared to other normal(cumulated) cubes. But still there is improvement in using aggregates.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P
Message was edited by: Anil Kumar Sharma

New ratio doesn't appear in Bex Query designer

Hello Experts,
I added 2 ratios to my infocube. It activated without any problem. I then added these 2 ratios to my multiprovider and activated it after affecting them to the previous infocube.
Then I connected to the Bex query designer and loaded a report in order to add these ratios, but there are not available for selection in the Ratio menu of the multiprovider.
Has anyone faced this problem?
Thanks

Try reactivating the Multiprovider again and see if that works !
I had this issue earlier, where I couldn't see two of the newly added characteristics in the multiprovider. But simply reactivating the multiprovider solved my issue.
- Danny

Cumulative ratio

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for