Customer is not created, while updating in a Tcode BP for a existing BP No

Hi,
Customer is not created against the Comapny code and business partner. suggest any notes to be implemted.
thnaks,
deepthi.

Hi,
In Tcode BP, I am selecting a Role with the Business Partner number. COMPANY CODE Push button on the Top is Enabled and Click on that.
Enter the Company Code and provide the details in Account management tab by providing Reconciliation Acct 120113, Sort key as 035, Planning Group as E1. Go to Payment Transaction Tab, Enter the Payment terms as Z003, check Record payment history. Now, Click on SAVE Button on the TOP.
The issue is that, The screen values are not retained in the Payment terms tab and Customer is not Created after saving of a BP Number.
Regards,
Deepthi.

Similar Messages

CIN: Items are not displayed while updating the RG1 Register using T Code:

Hi Experts,
Items are not displayed while updating the RG1 Register using T Code: J1I5.
System is not showing any error message.
Can any one explain to update the RG1 Register?
Thanks
Chandra

Hi,
dont go the table again and again . the table is updated at intial stage only for stock update but not when SAP is running.
In day to day bussiness the flow is as follows:
Production - MB31 - to Unres stock
Sales - VL02n - PGI - to customer - i.e out of unres stock
Every day u can run TC J1i5 once in a day as decided and update the register so all transactions which have happend in that day gets updated i.e both input and output.
and this will happen every day.
hence dont use table as it is only for intial data upload i.e just before golive.
Hope i am clear.
krishna

Customer is not created in sales area

hello gurus,
when i am creating sales order the output is not triggered and i am getting the error Customer is not created in sales area
how to solve this problem ichecked vd02 trasncsiotn and this custoemr exists for the sales area
afzal

Hi,
Check whether the partner function has been assigned the out put type or not?
Suresh
Edited by: sureshbabusure on May 8, 2010 9:07 AM

CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle

Dear Experts,
I have 4 company codes in my controlling area. I did all CO-PA configuration. But CO-PA Document is generated in Only one company code. Remaining company codes CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle
Ive carried a standard sales cycle that contains sales order (VA01),
and (VF04,VF02). System should generate 4
documents as follows
1) FI Document
2) CO Document
3) Profit Center Accounting Document
4) COPA Document
But in my case for 3 company codes only 3 documents are generated instead of CO-PA. But for one company code 4 documents are generated.
In my case i did all settings Operation concern level and assign to controlling area. I can,t Understood why system is generating CO-PA document for Only one company
Please suggest me where i miss the settings..
Regards,
Krishna.V

Dear Ajay,
Cost element category is 01. Because hear is one another company they have FI only all transactions they maintain through FI only. so hear we maintain Cost elements category 01.
I think it is not a problem. because hear i got CO-PA document from one company. Remaining 3 company is not generated.
Hear we maintained all gl's chart of acc level and cost elements also.
Please suggest me...
Regards,
Krishna. v

Firmware file not compatable while updating ios 6 direct download.

firmware file not compatable while updating ios 6 direct download.
its not a jb,

Are you trying to use Software Update on the iPhone?
Try updating using iTunes.

Error while updating HRA in infotype 581 for the employees.

Hi,
System is showing an error while updating HRA in infotype 581 for the employees.
The error is No Automatic updation for IT0008. Allowance Grouping not found.
What is this error. Please advice what to do in this case.

Hi Deepthi,
Check Table V_T7INA5,V_T7INA1,V_T7INA3 and V_T7INA9 also.
Check it,
Regards,
Vinod.
Edited by: vinod rao on Jul 30, 2008 1:23 PM

Trigger is not working while updating the values of UDF

Dear Freind,
I have created one Trigger for ORDR for Sales order. It is working fine. For that i have created two UDF to Title level. When i fill all fields it shows the correct result in DocTotal. But problem is that, while updateing specific record it also update but only refresh the DocTotal.
Means suppose i change the value of UDF fields that time it is not working it gives following error.
"There is difference between the document total and component total"
ALTER TRIGGER AmountForPC1
ON dbo.ORDR
AFTER INSERT,
UPDATE
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
UPDATE x
SET x.DocTotal = COALESCE(i.DocTotalSy, 0) + COALESCE(i.U_Ref, 0) + COALESCE(i.U_Sub, 0)
FROM dbo.ORDR AS x
INNER JOIN inserted AS i ON i.DocEntry = x.DocEntry
Thanks
Swapnil

Hi Swapnil,
Are you aware that you might run into trouble, at least when it comes to a support case, because you have created triggers?
Accordingly to note [896891|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMSZ3PTU4ODAwMDAr)/bc/bsp/spn/smb_searchnotes/display.htm?note_langu=E&note_numm=896891] triggers are not supported.
Regards
Mario

Business partner Customer is not created for Sales B Role in R/3

Hi,
I am trying to create Customer for a business partner associated with itin Tcdoe BP. I m giving the account management and Payment terms Tab details and clicking on SAVE button. The screen values are not retained and the Customer,Comapny code combination is also not created.
thanks,
Deepthi.

OSS Note 1254214 is applied and it is solved.

Transfer Order not created while performing GR for Production order

Hi, I am facing a problem while recieving stock from a production order. The system does not create a transfer requirement or a TO.
Let me give you a brief background.
This is a new functionality introduced in ECC 6.0 for working with kanban in WM.
Supply area is created for WM location.
Control cycle is created for material, supply area. Warehouse, storage type and Bin is maintained in control cycle record. When the GR is done for production order material is recieved in this bin.
1) Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
2) Once the production order is confirmed the material automatically shows up in the bin.
A material document is created which shows IM movement type 101 and WM movement type 103. Also in material document Immediate auto TO checkmark is blank.
3) *PROBLEM* - System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin. How can we enable an auto TR and TO creation.
Following are the settings which I have already checked:
1) In IMG, WM movement type 103 has auto TO indicator set.
2) IM-WM interface for 102 movement type and 103 movement type is maintained.
The main problem is: Although the material document displays WM movement type 103 and the stock lies in WM bin, System never created a Transfer requirement or a Transfer order.
I would really appreciate if anyone can help me in this.
Thanks

Hi Mike,
I do not know this function in SAP, so these are just my ideas:
1.
System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin.
I think it's a normal SAP behaviour. If you do GR against a PO the quant(s) will appear in interim storage bin w/o TO. The TO is to move the quants from one bin to another, but in this case the quant comes from 'nothing' and arrives at the bin.
If you make confirmation and consume the components refering to a PrdOrd, the components will disappear w/o TO from storage type 100 + dynamic bin, because there's no TO that could move them from dynamic bin to 'nothing'.
So, these 'movements' are to change the WM stock level and TOs are not designed for this.
2.
There's difference between auto creation of TO and immediate TO creation. Please check what SAP help says in case of TOs for outbound deliveries:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f8406c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
3.
Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
So, if you remove the stock from the Kanban it triggers the creation of a PrdOrd. This is very logical in a Kanban system because it is a pull system. but your problem is not this, it's clear.
If you just created an automatic TO and would remove the stock from Kanban-bin, a new PrdOrd would be generated, and so on. As many times you remove the stock a new PrdOrd is created and this might be the reason why no TO is crated automatically. In this case this would be a push system and not kanban system.
I do not know this process but if we concentrate only on the pull system, maybe this Kanaban is to store the FG until an event (e.g. shipment) should trigger the stock removal from this bin. (just my assumption)
Please try to mark the TR creation for the movement type w/o auto / immediate TO and tell us the result (whether you get the TR if you confirm the PrdOrd).
Regards,
Csaba

Excel file not created while running application using executable on different PC

Hi,
I have created an executable and an installer for an application. In this application I am saving data to an excel file using a template. This works fine when I run using the executable on development PC. However when I deploy this application on another PC, excel application opens the template and writes the data but the file is not saved or created at the desired destination.
The path for file to be saved is coming up right but no file is saved.
Development Machine details:
OS: Windows 7
Office version: 2010 (but I am saving file in 97-2003 format)
LV version: 2012
I had checked 'Unlock' option while building the application but stil faced the same issue

This error means that the VI which is downloaded to the FPGA was changed on the host/development system, but has not been recompiled. By recompiling it you resolve this problem.
When a LabVIEW FPGA VI is compiled for the FPGA, the bit stream, which will be downloaded to the FPGA, is stored in the VI file. When LabVIEW RT or LabVIEW Windows attempts to download the bit stream to the RIO card, it makes sure the bit stream corresponds to the VI source code in the same file. This is necessary so that the host application can properly communicate with the VI on the FPGA. If the two are not the same, this error is generated from the Open FPGA VI Reference function in the host application.
Christian L
NI Consulting Services
Christian Loew, CLA
Principal Systems Engineer, National Instruments
Please tip your answer providers with kudos.
Any attached Code is provided As Is. It has not been tested or validated as a product, for use in a deployed application or system,
or for use in hazardous environments. You assume all risks for use of the Code and use of the Code is subject
to the Sample Code License Terms which can be found at: http://ni.com/samplecodelicense

Workflow Item not created while processing draft PO from SOCO

Dear SAP SRM Experts,
In SRM 7.0, I've a scenario where I create a PO draft in sourcing.
In the 3step of the GAF, I've the option to
1. Edit the PO and order it.
2. Directly process the PO draft to create a PO..
While in case one the WF item is created with status awaiting approval, in the second case (when I directly process the draft) the workflow item is not created but the status is still 'Awaiting Approval' !!.
Use of PC workflow is done and the PO is not auto approved.
Any pointer regarding this would be very helpful.
The call stack is way different between the first step and second.
My understanding is if there is some error in the follow on PO, the work item would not be created. But the SC in soco is similar and while in first case it does create the workitem in second case it doesn't.
When does the decision to create workflow item is decided in second case?
Thanks.
Shushant

Hi Guys,
Thanks for your inputs.
The problem has been identified. The error is because the vendors are deleted completly from the system. And those were earlier used in shopping cart as preffered vendor. Thats why the system is throwing the error message.
As we can not process this SC further we want to delete this SC (line item). But again while deleting the SC the system is throwing the error message . "Business partner xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx not found." Thus its not allowing us to delete the SC.
Do you have any ideas how we can delete the SC line items, or SC ? Any FM ?
Thank you,

'timezone region not found' while updating connection pool

Hi Experts,
We have upgraded our weblogic server from 10.3.3.0(11.1.1.3.0) to 10.3.6.0(11.1.1.6.0)
All the data sources and connection pools were created in the previous version(11.1.1.3.0) and it worked fine.
After the upgrade has done, we tried to run a BPEL web service which is using a database connection to get some data.
Then the below error has thrown out in EM.
*<part name="summary">*
*<summary>Exception occured when binding was invoked. Exception occured during invocation of JCA binding: "JCA Binding execute of Reference operation 'Validate_Invoice' failed due to: Could not create/access the TopLink Session. This session is used to connect to the datastore. Caused by Exception [EclipseLink-7060] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.3.1.v20111018-r10243): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.ValidationException Exception Description: Cannot acquire data source [jdbc/EBSAPPS]. Internal Exception: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Unable to resolve 'jdbc.EBSAPPS'. Resolved 'jdbc'; remaining name 'EBSAPPS'. You may need to configure the connection settings in the deployment descriptor (i.e. DbAdapter.rar#META-INF/weblogic-ra.xml) and restart the server. This exception is considered not retriable, likely due to a modelling mistake. ". The invoked JCA adapter raised a resource exception. Please examine the above error message carefully to determine a resolution. </summary>*
*</part>*
*<part name="detail">*
*<detail> Exception Description: Cannot acquire data source [jdbc/EBSAPPS]. Internal Exception: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Unable to resolve 'jdbc.EBSAPPS'. Resolved 'jdbc'; remaining name 'EBSAPPS'</detail>*
*</part>*
Then I tried to recreate the data source and jndi name.
Then I got below error while creating connection pool,
An error occured during activation of changes. Please see the log for details.
Weblogic.Application.ModuleExeption
ORA-00604: Error occurred at recursive sql level 1ORA 1882:timezone region not found.
Database OS level timezone is - SLT
Weblogic server OS level timezone is - IST
As i remember above are the timezones there earlier also....
What can do??
Thanks in advance....

Hi Joe,
Thanks for the reply...
But it seems answers are given related to 'Application Express Listener'.
The thing is we got this issue once we upgrade the middleware tier. We cannot do anything on database side. (Remote database)
The solution should be in middleware, Weblogic server side.
Our live environment still in the 10.3.3.0 version. It works fine..
any suggestions ???
Thanks....

TO not created While GR revesral

Hello,
We have created the GR (movement type 101) (t code MIGO), system will created the TR and TO automaticaly. And i have checked in MSEG table TR entry available and in LTBP table TO number is avaibale.
The same GR we are going to reverse (movement type 102), here system is created only TR (autonmaticly) , why system is not created TO also.
we need system should created TR and TO both while reversal of GR also. How to do this ? or is their any user exit is their for this.
regards
sapman man

In MIGO, display both material documents (created for 101 and 102). You must be able to see the WM tab in in the detail data section at the bottom of MIGO screen.
Check what is the value for indicator 'Immediate TO'. generally, for 101, it is selected. For 102, it is not checked.
Because, in OMLR, you may not be having the proper settings fore 102.
But for 101, settings are properly maintained in OMLR.
Do a copy of 101 to 102 if 102 is not maintained in OMLR OR you can also set Immediate TO creation = A in OMLR against 102 mtype
regards,

Roaming profiles not created while the creation of user account

Hello,
Our file server (running windows server 2003) is hosting Roaming profiles for users (in active directory running 2003). And that worked just fine till this week, when trying to create some users, we figured out that their roaming profiles are not created
(after their first logon the the domain of course)
We checked out the NTFS permissions and the SMB share permissions, and everything looks correct.I have even modified the permissions as Microsoft recommands. But still nothing has changed.
What could be the problem? or where to look for some paths to troubleshoot this problem??
Thanks in advance!
Lotfi BOUCHERIT

Hi Lotfi B,
According to your description
the user, is not able to access the share from the Explorer, as Awinish said, there may be a network or Firewall issue.
Please try to troubleshoot the network issue referring to the following article:
Troubleshoot network connection problems
In addition, it would be helpful if you could help to collect the following information:
Could the old users access the share?
Did the GPResult show the GPO had applied successfully? Please run
Gpresult /h > C:\temp\gpresult.html (“C:\temp\”is the path of the gpresult.html,
you can set it yourself) in Command Prompt, the file gpresult.html is used for checking the resultant of Group Policy information.
Regards,
Lany Zhang

Outbound ORDRSP IDOC not created while processing using ALE_PROCESSING .

HI ALL,
i have done all the requiured config for o/b message control for ORDRSP idoc along with config in sale for dist.. model and assigning msg type to model etc and when i save my PO i can see the o/p being proposed but when i process that with A as medium, it is incorectly processed and no ordrsp idoc is created.i am using std idoc_output_ordrsp FM, when i debug the code the see an error in ALE_PROCESSING IN the perform new_dyn_perform
can anyone pls tell me why the idoc is not created.
thanks,

Hi eswar,
i have configured the partner profile for the LOGICAL SYSTEM that i hav created along with the message control deatils in msg ctrl tab( which i think should not really matter) as i have already created a distrib. model for my log. sys and attached my msg typ to that.
when i debug the flow ( rsnast00-rsnasted-ale_processing-idoc_output_ordrsp) i think the error is somewhere in the call function tede1-routid( idoc_output_ordrsp) in the new_dyn_perform subroutine.
but that FM is holding good for other ORDRSP idocs.i am really unable to understand where the error actually is.
thanks

Customer is not created, while updating in a Tcode BP for a existing BP No

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for