TO not created While GR revesral

Hello,
We have created the GR (movement type 101) (t code MIGO), system will created the TR and TO automaticaly. And i have checked in MSEG table TR entry available and in LTBP table  TO number is avaibale.
The same GR we are going to reverse (movement type 102), here system is created only TR (autonmaticly) , why system is not created TO also.
we need system should created TR and TO both while reversal of GR also. How to do this ? or is their any user exit is their for this.
regards
sapman man

In MIGO, display both material documents (created for 101 and 102).  You must be able to see the WM tab in in the detail data section at the bottom of MIGO screen.
Check what is the value for indicator 'Immediate TO'.  generally, for 101, it is selected.   For 102, it is not checked.
Because, in OMLR, you may not be having the proper settings fore 102.
But for 101, settings are properly maintained in OMLR.
Do a copy of 101 to 102 if 102 is not maintained in OMLR OR you can also set Immediate TO creation = A in OMLR against 102 mtype
regards,

Similar Messages

  • CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle

    Dear Experts,
    I have 4 company codes in my controlling area. I did all CO-PA configuration. But CO-PA Document is generated in Only one company code. Remaining company codes CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle
    I’ve carried a standard sales cycle that contains sales order (VA01),
    and (VF04,VF02). System should generate 4
    documents as follows
    1) FI Document
    2) CO Document
    3) Profit Center Accounting Document
    4) COPA Document
    But in my case for 3 company codes only 3 documents are generated instead of CO-PA. But for one company code 4 documents are generated.
    In my case i did all settings Operation concern level and assign to controlling area. I can,t Understood why system is generating CO-PA document for Only one company
    Please suggest me where i miss the settings..
    Regards,
    Krishna.V

    Dear Ajay,
    Cost element category is 01. Because hear is one another company they have FI only all transactions they maintain through FI only. so hear we maintain Cost elements category 01.
    I think it is not a problem. because hear i got CO-PA document from one company. Remaining 3 company is not generated.
    Hear we maintained all gl's chart of acc level and cost elements also.
    Please suggest me...
    Regards,
    Krishna. v

  • Transfer Order not created while performing GR for Production order

    Hi, I am facing a problem while recieving stock from a production order. The system does not create a transfer requirement or a TO.
    Let me give you a brief background.
    This is a new functionality introduced in ECC 6.0 for working with kanban in WM.
    Supply area is created for WM location.
    Control cycle is created for material, supply area. Warehouse, storage type and Bin is maintained in control cycle record. When the GR is done for production order material is recieved in this bin.
    1) Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
    2) Once the production order is confirmed the material automatically shows up in the bin.
    A material document is created which shows IM movement type 101 and WM movement type 103. Also in material document Immediate auto TO checkmark is blank.
    3) *PROBLEM* - System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin. How can we enable an auto TR and TO creation.
    Following are the settings which I have already checked:
    1) In IMG, WM movement type 103 has auto TO indicator set.
    2) IM-WM interface for 102 movement type and 103 movement type is maintained.
    The main problem is: Although the material document displays WM movement type 103 and the stock lies in WM bin, System never created a Transfer requirement or a Transfer order.
    I would really appreciate if anyone can help me in this.
    Thanks

    Hi Mike,
    I do not know this function in SAP, so these are just my ideas:
    1.
    System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin.
    I think it's a normal SAP behaviour. If you do GR against a PO the quant(s) will appear in interim storage bin w/o TO. The TO is to move the quants from one bin to another, but in this case the quant comes from 'nothing' and arrives at the bin.
    If you make confirmation and consume the components refering to a PrdOrd, the components will disappear w/o TO from storage type 100 + dynamic bin, because there's no TO that could move them from dynamic bin to 'nothing'.
    So, these 'movements' are to change the WM stock level and TOs are not designed for this.
    2.
    There's difference between auto creation of TO and immediate TO creation. Please check what SAP help says in case of TOs for outbound deliveries:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f8406c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    3.
    Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
    So, if you remove the stock from the Kanban it triggers the creation of a PrdOrd. This is very logical in a Kanban system because it is a pull system. but your problem is not this, it's clear.
    If you just created an automatic TO and would remove the stock from Kanban-bin, a new PrdOrd would be generated, and so on. As many times you remove the stock a new PrdOrd is created and this might be the reason why no TO is crated automatically. In this case this would be a push system and not kanban system.
    I do not know this process but if we concentrate only on the pull system, maybe this Kanaban is to store the FG until an event (e.g. shipment) should trigger the stock removal from this bin. (just my assumption)
    Please try to mark the TR creation for the movement type w/o auto / immediate TO and tell us the result (whether you get the TR if you confirm the PrdOrd).
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Workflow Item not created while processing draft PO from SOCO

    Dear SAP SRM Experts,
    In SRM 7.0, I've a scenario where I create a PO draft in sourcing.
    In the 3step of the GAF, I've the option to
    1. Edit the PO and order it.
    2. Directly process the PO draft to create a PO..
    While in case one the WF item is created with status awaiting approval, in the second case (when I directly process the draft) the workflow item is not created but the status is still 'Awaiting Approval' !!.
    Use of PC workflow is done and the PO is not auto approved.
    Any pointer regarding this would be very helpful.
    The call stack is way different between the first step and second.
    My understanding is if there is some error in the follow on PO, the work item would not be created. But the SC in soco is similar and while in first case it does create the workitem in second case it doesn't.
    When does the decision to create workflow item is decided in second case?
    Thanks.
    Shushant

    Hi Guys,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    The problem has been identified. The error is because  the vendors are deleted completly from the system. And those were  earlier used in shopping cart as preffered vendor. Thats why the system is throwing the error message. 
    As we can not process this SC further we want to delete this SC (line item).  But again while deleting the SC the system is throwing the error message . "Business partner xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx not found."  Thus its not allowing us to delete the SC.
    Do you have any ideas how we can delete the SC line items, or  SC ?  Any FM ?
    Thank you,

  • Roaming profiles not created while the creation of user account

    Hello,
    Our file server (running windows server 2003) is hosting Roaming profiles for users (in active directory running 2003). And that worked just fine till this week, when trying to create some users, we figured out that their roaming profiles are not created
    (after their first logon the the domain of course)
    We checked out the NTFS permissions and the SMB share permissions, and everything looks correct.I have even modified the permissions as Microsoft recommands. But still nothing has changed.
    What could be the problem? or where to look for some paths to troubleshoot this problem??
    Thanks in advance!
    Lotfi BOUCHERIT

    Hi Lotfi B,
    According to your description
    the user, is not able to access the share from the Explorer, as Awinish said, there may be a network or Firewall issue.
    Please try to troubleshoot the network issue referring to the following article:
    Troubleshoot network connection problems
    In addition, it would be helpful if you could help to collect the following information:
    Could the old users access the share?
    Did the GPResult show the GPO had applied successfully? Please run
    Gpresult /h > C:\temp\gpresult.html  (“C:\temp\”is the path of the gpresult.html,
    you can set it yourself) in Command Prompt, the file gpresult.html is used for checking the resultant of Group Policy information.
    Regards,
    Lany Zhang

  • Outbound ORDRSP IDOC not created while processing  using ALE_PROCESSING .

    HI ALL,
    i have done all the requiured config for o/b message control for ORDRSP idoc along with config in sale for dist.. model and assigning msg type to model etc and when i save my PO i can see the o/p being proposed but when i process that with A as medium, it is incorectly processed and no ordrsp idoc is created.i am using std idoc_output_ordrsp FM,  when i debug the code the see an error in ALE_PROCESSING IN the perform new_dyn_perform
    can anyone pls tell me why the idoc is not created.
    thanks,

    Hi eswar,
    i have configured the partner profile for the LOGICAL SYSTEM that i hav created along with the message control deatils in msg ctrl tab( which i think should not really matter) as i have already created a distrib. model for my log. sys and attached my msg typ to that.
    when i debug the flow ( rsnast00-rsnasted-ale_processing-idoc_output_ordrsp) i think the error is somewhere in the call function tede1-routid( idoc_output_ordrsp) in the new_dyn_perform subroutine.
    but that FM is holding good for other ORDRSP idocs.i am really unable to understand where the error actually is.
    thanks

  • Customer is not created, while updating in a Tcode BP for a existing BP No

    Hi,
    Customer is not created against the Comapny code and business partner. suggest any notes to be implemted.
    thnaks,
    deepthi.

    Hi,
    In Tcode BP, I am selecting a Role with the Business Partner number. COMPANY CODE Push button on the Top is Enabled and Click on that.
    Enter the Company Code and provide the details in Account management tab by providing Reconciliation Acct 120113, Sort key as 035, Planning Group as E1. Go to Payment Transaction Tab, Enter the Payment terms as Z003, check Record payment history. Now, Click on SAVE Button on the TOP.
    The issue is that, The screen values are not retained in the Payment terms tab and Customer is not Created after saving of a BP Number.
    Regards,
    Deepthi.

  • Excel file not created while running application using executable on different PC

    Hi,
    I have created an executable and an installer for an application. In this application I am saving data to an excel file using a template. This works fine when I run using the executable on development PC. However when I deploy this application on another PC, excel application opens the template and writes the data but the file is not saved or created at the desired destination.
    The path for file to be saved is coming up right but no file is saved.
    Development Machine details:
    OS: Windows 7
    Office version: 2010 (but I am saving file in 97-2003 format)
    LV version: 2012
    I had checked 'Unlock' option while building the application but stil faced the same issue

    This error means that the VI which is downloaded to the FPGA was changed on the host/development system, but has not been recompiled. By recompiling it you resolve this problem.
    When a LabVIEW FPGA VI is compiled for the FPGA, the bit stream, which will be downloaded to the FPGA, is stored in the VI file. When LabVIEW RT or LabVIEW Windows attempts to download the bit stream to the RIO card, it makes sure the bit stream corresponds to the VI source code in the same file. This is necessary so that the host application can properly communicate with the VI on the FPGA. If the two are not the same, this error is generated from the Open FPGA VI Reference function in the host application.
    Christian L
    NI Consulting Services
    Christian Loew, CLA
    Principal Systems Engineer, National Instruments
    Please tip your answer providers with kudos.
    Any attached Code is provided As Is. It has not been tested or validated as a product, for use in a deployed application or system,
    or for use in hazardous environments. You assume all risks for use of the Code and use of the Code is subject
    to the Sample Code License Terms which can be found at: http://ni.com/samplecodelicense

  • Database folder is not created while installing sap netweaver 7.01

    Hello,
    i am trying to install sap netweaver on my laptop, but i am facing a problem while installing it.
    installation gets completed within few minutes and even no databse folder is being created in the drive.
    when i try to start the the application server a error message appears
    "service name is invalid,
    more help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 2185
    start database failed"
    suggest me a solution please.
    is it so because before running the main setup, i installed the maxdb seprately and then later i uninstalled it before running the main setup??
    laptop configuration
    ram 1 gb, installing in e:,java version latest.
    Regards,
    Umesh

    hello.
    thanks you all for replies.
    i have installed a fresh window finally to install sap netweaver abap trial version.
    windows xp service pack 2.
    jre1.4.1_07
    and finally i am getting a following error log.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:09 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Expected service (SAPNSP_00) is not currently running
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:09 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, wrn, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Service SAPNSP_00 is not available, retry after 10 s.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:19 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Expected service (SAPNSP_00) is not currently running
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:19 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, wrn, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Service SAPNSP_00 is not available, retry after 10 s.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:29 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Expected service (SAPNSP_00) is not currently running
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:29 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, wrn, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Service SAPNSP_00 is not available, retry after 10 s.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:39 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Expected service (SAPNSP_00) is not currently running
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:39 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, wrn, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Service SAPNSP_00 is not available, retry after 10 s.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:49 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Expected service (SAPNSP_00) is not currently running
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:49 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, wrn, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Service SAPNSP_00 is not available, retry after 10 s.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:59 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Expected service (SAPNSP_00) is not currently running
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:16:59 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, wrn, CheckServicesAction(bean17): Service SAPNSP_00 is not available, retry after 10 s.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:17:09 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, An error occurred and product installation failed.  Look at the log file e:\SAP\NSP\log.txt for details.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:17:09 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction, err, ProductException: (error code = 601; message="Services failed to start (see the log for details)")
    STACK_TRACE: 12
    ProductException: (error code = 601; message="Services failed to start (see the log for details)")
         at com.sap.installshield.CheckServicesAction.install(CheckServicesAction.java:95)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl.installProductAction(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.getResultForProductAction(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitComponent(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitInstallableComponents(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitProductBeans(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.install(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$Installer.execute(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.wizard.service.AsynchronousOperation.run(Unknown Source)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:17:15 PM), Install, com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct, err, An error occurred and product uninstallation failed.  Look at the log file e:\SAP\NSP\log.txt for details.
    (Sep 18, 2010 3:17:15 PM), Install, com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles, err, ProductException: (error code = 200; message="Java error"; exception = [java.lang.Exception])
    STACK_TRACE: 15
    ProductException: (error code = 200; message="Java error"; exception = [java.lang.Exception])
         at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.execute(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:254)
         at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.executeAllSteps(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:224)
         at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.executeAllUninstallationSteps(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:192)
         at com.sap.installshield.sdcstepswrapper.StepWrapperInstallFiles.uninstall(StepWrapperInstallFiles.java:313)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl.uninstallProductAction(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.processActionsFailed(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitComponent(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitInstallableComponents(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.InstallableObjectVisitor.visitProductBeans(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$InstallProduct.install(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.product.service.product.PureJavaProductServiceImpl$Installer.execute(Unknown Source)
         at com.installshield.wizard.service.AsynchronousOperation.run(Unknown Source)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
    please help.

  • Multiple document numbers not created while creating multiple idocs.

    Hi Experts,
    we have developed one the interface file to idoc, whenever invoice number change it will create a multiple idocs.
    but i am facing some issue with context handling, can you suggest the suitable mapping / UDF for the below issue.
    Our customized idoc structure has header and line items and both are in not same level-its parent child structure.
    in our sample file there are three different invoice number and as per the requirement its creating three idocs and corresponding headers but not line item details.
    all line item details creating in 1st idoc itself and 2nd and 3rd idoc has only header items no line items. but tried fix with graphical mapping context handling for this problem but not resolved. please advise.
    Regards,
    Krushi.

    hi Hareesh,
    thank you for your quick response.
    after the File Adapter FCC, below is the inbound payload, first four feilds we mapped to header and rest for line items.
    <SettlementDetails>
    <row>
      <PaymentType>CHECK</PaymentType>
      <Filler></Filler>
      <Currency>IN</Currency>
      <Filler1></Filler1>
      <Invoice>100410-133MT5-MH</Invoice>
      <Filler2></Filler2>
      <SettlementMethod>4</SettlementMethod>
      <Filler3></Filler3>
      <PreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>MT</PreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>
      <Filler4></Filler4>
      <FinalPayAmount>12.00</FinalPayAmount>
      <Filler5></Filler5>
      <ProductIDUnformatted>55111064001</ProductIDUnformatted>
      <Filler6></Filler6>
      <Filler7></Filler7>
      <Filler8></Filler8>
      <PaytoPreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>MT</PaytoPreferredTradingPartnerIdentifier>
      <ClaimType>ORIG</ClaimType>
      <CMSRecordID>FFSU</CMSRecordID>
    </row>
    </SettlementDetails>
    multiple settlement details will be there.
    regards,
    krushi.

  • CO document not created while billing

    Hi,
    When a sales document is released to accounting, the controlling document is not being generated.
    The following documents are being generated.
    Accounting document
    Profitability Analysis document
    Special purpose ledger document.
    Could you please help me out to find out why the controlling document is not being generated.
    Thanks,
    Venkat

    Why would yo uwant to generate a controlling document?
    Its not necessary.
    You define revenue accounts as category 11 accounts, hence not necessarily they post to CO - objects like cost center. It would get posted to CO PA only.
    The system is behaving correctly.
    Please proceed.
    Regards
    Anantha

  • Control Recipe not created

    Hi PP Gurus,
              I have issue of Control recipe not created while creating the process order. So that log on PI generation/ ctrl recipe creation is empty. It is not possible to enter data for PI sheet as it is not generated while creating process order.
             Could you please suggest, what are the probable reasons which are leading to this issue?
    Thanks,
    Reddy

    Hi Pankaj,
            Thanks for your response. I have tested control recipe creation from the process order, before posting the issue. It seems few issues related to process instructions.
    I have got a solution for creating Control recipe and PI sheet by spending some time on this issue.
    I am closing this issue.
    Thanks,
    Reddy

  • COPA DOCUMENT NOT CREATED AFTER BILLING

    HI
    COPA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle
    I’ve carried a standard sales cycle that contains sales order (VA01),
    Delivery (VL01n) and billing document (VF01). System should generate 4
    documents as follows
    1) FI Document
    2) CO Document
    3) Profit Center Accounting Document
    4) COPA Document
    But in my case only 3 documents are generated instead of COPA.
    I completed the total COPA configuration with creation of operating concern and assigned SD condition types. And also maintained number range for actual copa line items.
    Fllowing things are done.
    1) assignment of controlling area to Operating concern .
    2) controlling area setting activate profitability analysis.
    3)Valuation Strategies are assigned to the Points of Valuation in ke4u.
    4)SD Quantity Field to a COPA Quantity Field (Normally FKIMG assigned to ABSMG).
    when we excute the transcation  KE4S system display the error  Document "XXXXXXXXXX" is not profit-related and thus could not be transferred.
    when we go back  to the Billing Document in the Change mode, click on the PSG button in Account Assignment it is showing some characterstics also.

    Hi
    I have already mentioned in my pervious mail what the activities done by me. Quantity filed are already assign KE4M.Please do needful for me and give me suitable answer.

  • Error occured for "APP-PO-14090: Document was not created

    Hi All,
    Can anbody please help for the error occured as
    "APP-PO-14090: Document was not created", while creating purchase order through Auto create feature in Purchasing Module.
    So request you please help me.
    Thanks for your response in advance.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ram.V

    Hi All,
    Thanks for the replies, I found the sollution.
    for further references here I am providing the sollution.
    The issue happens when ship to bill to location is there but the organization is not given in the location definition form while defining the location. In order to reference the organization to location please perform the following steps:-
    1. Go into the responsibility: India Local Inventory
    2. Navigate to Oracle Inventory > Setup > Organizations > Locations > Query Location
    3. Navigate to Other tab and provide the name of organization. Save changes.
    4. Retest the issue.
    5. Migrate the solution as appropriate to other environments.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ram.V
    Edited by: 901012 on Dec 11, 2011 11:31 PM

  • Inspection lot not created (QA32)

    HI , QM/PP Expert,
    1.for the raw material Inspection lot is not created while posting . I have done settings in mat. mast.
    2.Can tell while doing MIGO we have change stock type or system teckes automatically.
    Nitu..........

    Hi Nitu,
    You have maintained inspection type, number ranges etc etc perfectly, correct?
    Then now check the same "stock type" (that you have checked in MIGO) in Purchase Order also. It is be check for line item details--> Delivery tab.
    When the PO is get posted system checks the inspection type activation in the, if it is activated then it will set the "stock type" as Quality Inspection, at PO itself and then the same thing copied over to GR. So if the inspection type is maintained accurately then all the processed PO & GRs will react accordingly.
    One more thing you need to check, as you are complaining "Lot is not getting triggered" then let me know have you maintained the Q - Info Record for this Plant-Material-Vendor Combination? Check it through trx QI03.
    Regards,
    Shyamal

Maybe you are looking for

  • Credit Memo Appliying in AR (11i)

    Dear All, I have one doubt with the AR credit memo as below: If I created the credit memo on 1-MAY-09 and transfered the CM to GL on the same day. Now the May-09 period is closed and the only open period is Jun-09. Can this CM apply (Action -> Applic

  • Can I get rid of the twitter for iPhone thing at the top for good

    I am using twitter mobile and don't want to install the app. I am wondering instead of hitting the x by the app, can I get rid of that forever or do I have to just hit the x every time? Maybe there's a way and I don't see it. My ipod is a touch 5th G

  • Rollover conflicting with js slideshow

    I am creating a new look for my website and I have a draft of the new homepage at http://nysipm.cornell.edu/2nd_page/2nd_page/default_backup.asp My next step is to add a link to our Events Calendar page via a rollover image.  I have tried adding the

  • WSAD How to open exsisting workspace.

    Hi All, I have problem. Currently I m using WSAD tool for development. I want to know How to open the exsisting workspace. When I start the WSAD I have checked the default workspack check box. After this when ever I m opening the WSAD Its getting ope

  • Basic Back to My Mac questions

    1. Can I use Back to My Mac to log into my dad's Mac to help him when he questions or Mac issues? 2. Is the idea behind this to be able to retrieve a file off your other Mac when you are away from it? If so, can I use an iPhone or iPad to access file