Delayed to stablish a call from jabber to jabber

Good day
I am presenting a problem:
when I call from jabber device ( jabber for windows, ipad,) other device jabber (jabber for windows, ipad), the call sets after 8 sec, witch ip comunicator the call is immediately established.
Is normal this in jabber?
Is because a ipc work sccp and jabber sip?
my device profile is the device profile default.
please help me

Hi Jesus,
I dont think that this problem could be because of SCCP vs SIP, but you could try using IPC with SIP protocol to see if there is a delay as well in that scenario and confirm this.
In the past I saw similar issues if DN's and translation patterns on CUCM are not correctly configured (pattern and DN starting with the same digit). For instance if you have a pattern starting with 1 and expecting four other digits, and a four digit DN starting also with 1, when you dial that DN, CUCM will actually have to wait for a fifth digit (for few seconds) to see if it can pair that to a translation pattern.
Thanks,
Marko

Similar Messages

Video doesn't work when calling from Jabber to DX650

Hi,
I just added a DX650 to our CUCM 9.1.2. When I call from either Jabber to the DX650 or Lync to DX650, the video doesn't work and the call is audio only. The message i'm seeing on Jabber is something like "the other endpoint is not accepting video." Sorry i don't remember the exact message. Has anyone seen this issue before? Thanks!

Lync is not standards based and has proprietary codecs for video. You will need a Expressway with the MS Interop key to get video both ways.
https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/config_guide/X8-2/Cisco-VCS-Microsoft-Lync-Deployment-Guide-X8-2.pdf

Decode Error in Cisco VCS for a call from Jabber to telyHD

Hi,
We have the following setup:
Cisco Jabber <---> Cisco VCS <---> telyHD (Our Video Product)
Now, the call works well when the call is intiated from telyHD to Cisco Jabber.
But, the call fails when the Cisco Jabber initiates the call towards telyHD.
The packet capture on VCS shows that there is a syslog message from VCS to Jabber indicating the following when 180 Ringing is received from telyHD:
Message [truncated]: tvcs: Event="Decode Error" Service="SIP" Src-ip="10.1.1.19" Src-port="5060" Dst-ip="10.1.11.11" Dst-port="25331" Detail="(User-Agent) Single header User-Agent appeared twice in message" Protocol="TCP" Level="1" UTCTime
Can you please help in troubleshooting this issue. I don't see multiple "User-Agent" headers in the 180 Ringing sent by telyHD.
I have attached the packet capture on VCS.

I am also having the same issue. Can someone please respond? Thanks.

Caller ID does not work when calling from Jabber

We have the following results when doing calls within the company:
Desk Phone A (4567-X-Smith): 7801234567
Desk Phone B (4568-Y-Miller): 7801234568
Main Company Line: 7801230000
All desk phones have the following type of configuration:
Under the phone -> Line[1] -> Line1 on Device <MAC>
Display (Internal Caller ID): 4567-X-Smith
ASCII Display (Internal Caller ID): Our Company Name
Line Text Label: 780-123-4567
ASCII Line Text Label: 780-123-4567
External Phone Number Mask: 7801230000
Desk Phone A calls Desk Phone B
- caller ID shows up properly on Desk Phone B as 4567-X-Smith
User at Desk Phone A makes the call through the Jabber client to Desk Phone B
- caller ID shows up as 7801230000
This last situation is the problem since we want all internal calls whether they're form the desk phone or Jabber to show the proper caller ID. However, we want the generic main company line (7801230000) to show up to anybody outside the company. What is set incorrectly? Why does Jabber take over the line but not keep the same caller ID settings? Does jabber work as if it's doing an external call?
Thanks in advance,
Kris

Interesting... I just 4-digit dialed 8182 (typed in the Search field at the top of the jabber window) and my proper caller ID showed up...
Next I tried 10 digit dial 7804988182 through jabber and it showed 7804988100 (our external calling mask). I also just noiced that it very briefly flashes 97804988182 so that seems to indicate it's trying to dial through the PSTN...
Oddly enough, if I 10 digit dial through my desk phone, it shows the proper caller ID.

No video stream when calling 3rd party endpoint from Jabber client

I use my own H323 client based on the H323Plus open source. It works very well with VCS and all endpoints we tried (a dozen or so from every vendor). We have a problem with Jabber Video though, across all versions from MOVI to 4.4.3. When my own client calls Jabber everything works as it should. However, when Jabber calls my client then (1) it takes up to a minute for Jabber to display incoming video and (2) Jabber does not create outgoing video stream. This behavior is 100% reproducible across all PCs we tried. Jabber is registered with either VCS Starter Pack or VCS Control, sofwtare version 6.1 in both cases. We do not use provisioning at this time.
In Jabber logs there is a unclear hint about insufficient resources (bandwidth?) for the video stream. VCS configuration is fine (it works with all other clients like e20) and I do not see anything useful in VCS logs.
To narrow the discussion, this is NOT a firewall, client camera or driver, OS misconfiguration or any other external issue. It is Jabber video having problem negotiating capabilities and/or resources but only it initiates the call. Where should I look for a solution?

I was afraid this will end this way. I hoped you might have had such a case solved already :-).
Audio works fine, no problem at all. The video packets are not sent from my client to Jabber while in the 1 minute wait; the stream from Jabber is not even started. I still think I need Wireshark to decode H225 traffic. Good idea with the interworking log - I was too lazy to go the OS layer. As you surely know, only 2 of the VCS logs are available from the Web interface.
thanks for your help!

XML Layout to be attached to a SRS Report called from back end.

Hi,
I have got a set of reports which I will have to call from the back end using FND_REQUEST.SUBMIT_REQUEST packaged function.
In that, some are having a XML layout. When being submitted these requests do not get the XML layout called; hence, the display fails with error 'Unable to find published output for this request'.
Kindly help me on how to refer the XML layout during the calling of the backend function.
Thanks,
L. Mukunthan

Hi,
Sorry for the delay.
Answers to your Q's as below:
1. how is your concurrent report defined ? is the concurrent program output format XML ?
YES
2. In the report itself (rdf), under report properties - XML setting section, is the XML Prolog value set ?
XML Prolog value set: <?xml version="1.0"?>
3. Have you validated that the report query(ies) is(are) working in SQL*PLS/Toad/SQL Developer ?
This is a report registered and working fine, when run manually. Only submission from back end omits the layout. Hence, being unable to publish the output.
4. If the report query is working and everything is correctly setup, have you look on the server if XML is generated ?
Yes. Output is getting generated. Only issue is the attachment of the layout template.
Please advise.
Thanks,
L. Mukunthan

Crystal Reports 2008 fails when called from e Web Service under 64bit OS

I have discovered that Crystal Reports 2008 doesn't work when called from a Web Service running under 64bit Windows platforms (in my case Windows 2003 Server and Windows XP 64bit); practically no object is instantiated. I've tried several solutions without success.
Before creating a wrapper component to use under COM+, is there anybody who has a better and cheaper solution than creating another component to wrap CR 2008 ?

Hi Sergio,
Before I mark this post as assumed answered I would just like to say and re-iterate that at this time there is no one answer and we fully understand your concerns. As you know in CR 6.0 it came in 16 and 32 bit versions because at the time 32 bit was relatively new but 16 bit was the norm. This is also true for 32 to 64 bit, 32 is the norm and 64 bit is relatively new. We know and are well aware 64 bit is the future and we are working as quickly as we can to move in that direction. Because of the complexity of the Product it's not simply a matter of re-compiling all of our dll's in 64 bit format. The core of our data connectivity with our database drivers which are dependant on third party clients must also need to support 64 bit modes. This as well as Printer drivers also need to be 64 compatable, there are a multitude of dependencies that we rely on that must add 64 bit support. As a programmer you are well aware of the issues around Thunking back and forth between 32 to 64 bits, it can cause delays and potentially loss of data which is a whole other issue. Not to mention also that we would have to ship both versions potentially doubling the size of the distribution packages or doubling the size of the dll's to have the ability to work in both modes. Relatively speaking of course, it would not be double the size but the variables would need to be able to allocate 32 or 64 memory blocks.
The other option is to produce 2 separate versions, this alone is a massive project. Any issue would need to be fixed in separate code streams.
So I'm sure you can see it's not simply a matter of saying yes we support 64 bit. It's a massive project that is going to take time to do and we have to wait for the third party drivers to commit also.
Visual Studio .NET 2005 and 2008 is the only option if you want true 64 bit but you will be limited on what DB's you can support and export formats you can export to. They are the only drivers we did convert to 64 bit.
Thank you for your understanding
Don

External Web Service call from Sandbox Solution in SharePoint 2010

Can anyone from this forum can tell me how to call an external web service from Sandbox solution?
It would of great help as got stuck on it for a long time.
Note:- Cannot use Silverlight and JQuery to call web service from client side.Cannot use full trust proxy.

Hi Dibyendu,
Sorry for delay but fact that we can not call webservice in sand box solution(It's does not support).
The reason behind of this sand box solution support only full trust code.
One or more assemblies referenced by the XmlSerializer cannot be called
from partially trusted code.
When you create a reference to a Web service, Microsoft Visual Studio®.NET creates and places one or more objects in your assembly to store the argument data passed to the method(s) in the Web service. These objects are serialized using the XmlSerializer class
when you invoke one or more of the methods in the Web service. By default, if your assembly is strongly named and resides in the BIN directory, callers with partial trust cannot access objects within that assembly. When you make the call to the Web service
method, the XmlSerializerdetects that there are partially trusted callers on the callstack (i.e. your assembly) and prevents the serialization from taking place even though the object resides in the same assembly.
Er.vinay

VI calling from a multi-thread Teststand

Hello,
My test system tests four UUTs at the same time(with batch mode in TS), the code is based on LabVIEW and call from TS, so every step the same VI will be accessed by four thread. however, it runs quite slow even i set the reentrant execution in VI propertise.
My Quesition:
Can I do it like this in multi-thread mode of TS?
How can I make it fast? (convert VI to dll?????)
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,Steven

Hello Allen,
Thanks for your help.
Problem: I have a LabVIEW VI with parallel code blocks. These blocks run in parallel as expected when I run my VI directly or from a top level VI. However, the code blocks seem to run sequentially when I call my VI from TestStand. Why is this happening and how can I fix it?
Solution: In order to fix this behavior, simply set the VI Properties of "Execution" of your LabVIEW VI to "Other 1" or "Other 2". This change will make the parallel code blocks in your LabVIEW VI run in parallel as expected. To change this setting, from your LabVIEW VI, go to File»VI Properties. Select the Execution category. Change the Preferred Execution System to be either other 1 or other 2.
You need to make this change to any LabVIEW VI with parallel code blocks that is called from TestStand. The reason for this is that TestStand is using the LabVIEW ActiveX interface to run LabVIEW VIs. The LabVIEW ActiveX interface sets the caller's execution system to "User Interface" by default. This execution system is not recommended for a VI with parallel code blocks. If your LabVIEW VI's execution system is set to "Same as caller" (which is the default setting when creating a new LabVIEW VI), then it is executed in the User Interface thread when run through the LabVIEW ActiveX interface. This prevents the blocks to be executed in parallel.
In fact, only one block in my LabVIEW code, but it accessed by four thread from TS. I am sure that my VI can be accessed by four thread simultaneously if I enable the reentrant excution in VI property. I also have tried what mentioned in above document but no use.
However, if i only add a 1000ms delay to my LabView code instead of the 'calculation', it is fast enough! what is happening or something i set wrong?
I don't want to convert all my LabView code to DLL cos too many VIs here, and difficult for mantenance either.
Any other good solution???
Thank you Allen...
Steven

An incoming call from VoIP. The SPA122 generate Dial Tone after the far end hung up rather busy tone.

Hi All!
I have a problem with the SPA122 telephony adapter, uncorrectly process the subscriber signaling at the end of the call.
1) Outbound call from FXS port SPA122 . When a remote caller hangs up first , the subscriber SPA122 Reorder Tone played with a delay specified in the Reorder Delay. This circuit is working properly.
2 ) Incoming call from VoIP to the SPA122. When a remote caller hangs up first , subscriber on the FXS port of the SPA122 hears silence ~ 3-4 seconds , then SPA122 plays Dial Tone, as if he had just picked up the phone and he 's going to call . No signal lights out (Busy Tone or Reorder Tone) will not play .
Config is attached.
Model: SPA122, LAN, 2 FXS
Hardware Version: 1.0.0 Boot Version: 1.0.1 (Oct 6 2011 - 20:04:00)
Firmware Version: 1.3.2-XU (014) Jul 2 2013
Recovery Firmware: 1.0.2 (001)
WAN MAC Address: 6C:20:56:55:3A:B6
Host Name: SPA122
Domain Name: (none)
Serial Number: CCQ16450LG3
However, other VoIP terminals registered to Huawei, including older versions of the Linksys SPA2102 work in these scenarios correctly.
Where to kick it?

[2] is misconfiguration on your's side. You have CPC turned on, but no CPC capable device. Set CPC Duration to zero to turn off CPC.
By the way, wrong forum for your question. You should consider to move it to space.

Transferring call from phone to bluetooth device

My car has built in blue tooth. When I make a call from the phone I have 3 options on the screen:
1. handsfree link (bluetooth)
2. iphone
3. speaker
If I press "handsfree link" it does NOT transfer the call from the phone to the bluetooth until the other party answers. This is really strange, and causes a delay when the other person answers.
Now I know I can use the car's bluetooth to place the call but there are times when I dial from the phone.
Does anyone else have this issue? Is there a work-around for it?
Thanks!

I would contact your car manufacturer as they have all the information of teh bluetooth setup thats in your car. They will have a better idea whats going on as its there system.
Have you tried it with any other phone or car bluetooth if its possible?
Message was edited by: ataylor87

Delay in softphone incoming calls

Hi All,
Softphone users are unable to hear the other party for few seconds. We are having this issue for incoming calls.
If anybody came across this issue, please let us know your suggestion
Thanks in advance !

Thanks
let me explain the issue with more info.
Scenario:
When a CIPC receives an incoming call, let say I am calling from cell phone to CIPC user, when the call get connect, for the first 4 to 5 seconds CIPC user can not hear anything, but I can hear them clearly, so there was a one way audio/delay for the first 5 seconds, after this both party able to hear. It is not occurring on all calls.
We able to duplicate this on a inbound call only, not sure whether its happening on outbound too.
Tried with Both CIPC 7.0 and 8.6, also it happens regardless how the CIPC is connected i.e., local LAN or VPN.

4FXS-DID configuration problem using BRI to receive/send calls from/to PSTN

Hi to all.
Follow is the partial configuration of my CME.
It has a 4FXS card to use analog phones and faxes, and 4 ISDN Basic Rate interfaces.
On each port of the 4FXS DID card happens the following:
If I enable direct-inward-dial
    I can receive calls from PSTN.
     Off hooking the analog phone I cannot hear any free line tone. I cannot make any call from that phone.
If I disable direct-inward-dial
    I cannot receive directly calls form PSTN.
          Callers on PSTN after typing my number, they hear a free tone. Then just typing the extension desired the phone ring.
     Off hooking the analog phone I hear a free line tone. I can make normal calls to everyone.
I have half the configuration working.
Where am I wrong?
I really appreciate your help.
Thanks to all.
Giorgio.
CME#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-IPVOICEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(13r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
CME uptime is 2 days, 15 hours, 49 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System restarted at 18:54:45 CDT Fri Aug 2 2013
System image file is "flash:/c2800nm-ipvoicek9-mz.124-24.T3.bin"
Cisco 2811 (revision 53.50) with 249856K/12288K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FTX1120A08L
2 FastEthernet interfaces
4 ISDN Basic Rate interfaces
16 terminal lines
4 Voice FXS interfaces
DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity enabled.
239K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
1948656K bytes of USB Flash usbflash0 (Read/Write)
497448K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (Read/Write)
Configuration register is 0x2102
CME#sh telephony-service
CONFIG (Version=7.1)
=====================
Version 7.1
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express
isdn switch-type basic-net3
voice translation-rule 1
rule 1 /^2929091$..$/ /\1/
rule 2 /^2929091$.$/ /\1/
rule 3 /^02929091$..$/ /\1/
rule 4 /^02929091$.$/ /\1/
voice translation-rule 2
rule 2 /$.*$/ /02929091\1/
voice translation-rule 10
rule 1 /$^......$$/ /0\1/ type national national plan isdn isdn
rule 8 /$^......$$/ /00\1/ type international international plan isdn isdn
voice translation-profile PSTN-IN
translate calling 10
translate called 1
voice translation-profile PSTN-OUT
translate calling 2
interface BRI0/0/0
description Isdn channels 1 & 2
no ip address
isdn switch-type basic-net3
isdn timer T310 60000
isdn overlap-receiving T302 3000
isdn point-to-point-setup
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
isdn static-tei 0
interface BRI0/0/1
description Isdn channels 3 & 4
no ip address
isdn switch-type basic-net3
isdn timer T310 60000
isdn overlap-receiving T302 3000
isdn point-to-point-setup
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
isdn static-tei 0
interface BRI0/1/0
description Isdn channels 5 & 6
no ip address
isdn switch-type basic-net3
isdn timer T310 60000
isdn overlap-receiving T302 3000
isdn point-to-point-setup
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
isdn static-tei 0
interface BRI0/1/1
description not used
no ip address
shutdown
isdn switch-type basic-net3
isdn timer T310 60000
isdn overlap-receiving T302 3000
isdn point-to-point-setup
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
isdn static-tei 0
voice-port 0/0/0
translation-profile incoming PSTN-IN
translation-profile outgoing PSTN-OUT
compand-type a-law
description Connessione con CO Telecom channels 1 & 2
voice-port 0/0/1
translation-profile incoming PSTN-IN
translation-profile outgoing PSTN-OUT
compand-type a-law
description Connessione con CO Telecom channels 3 & 4
voice-port 0/1/0
translation-profile incoming PSTN-IN
translation-profile outgoing PSTN-OUT
compand-type a-law
description Connessione con CO Telecom channels 5 & 6
voice-port 0/1/1
description Disponibile
voice-port 0/2/0
input gain 14
connection plar 83
description Interphone 40
station-id name Citofono
station-id number 40
caller-id enable
voice-port 0/2/1
cptone IT
description Ced 35
station-id name CED
station-id number 35
caller-id enable
voice-port 0/2/2
cptone IT
description FAX_1 50
station-id name FAX_1
station-id number 50
caller-id enable
voice-port 0/2/3
cptone IT
description FAX_2 60
station-id name FAX_1
station-id number 60
caller-id enable
dial-peer voice 1001 pots
description **Sends call to PSTN line 1-2**
destination-pattern 0T
progress_ind alert enable 8
progress_ind progress enable 8
progress_ind connect enable 8
port 0/0/0
dial-peer voice 2001 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN line 1-2**
destination-pattern 2929091..
incoming called-number .T
direct-inward-dial
port 0/0/0
dial-peer voice 1003 pots
description **Sends call to PSTN line 3-4**
destination-pattern 0T
progress_ind alert enable 8
progress_ind progress enable 8
progress_ind connect enable 8
port 0/0/1
dial-peer voice 2003 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN line 3-4**
destination-pattern 2929091..
incoming called-number .T
direct-inward-dial
port 0/0/1
dial-peer voice 1005 pots
description **Sends call to PSTN line 5-6**
destination-pattern 0T
progress_ind alert enable 8
progress_ind progress enable 8
progress_ind connect enable 8
port 0/1/0
dial-peer voice 2005 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN line 5-6**
destination-pattern 2929091..
incoming called-number .T
direct-inward-dial
port 0/1/0
dial-peer voice 2035 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Extension 35**
answer-address 35
destination-pattern 35$
incoming called-number 35
port 0/2/1
dial-peer voice 2040 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Extension 40**
destination-pattern 40
incoming called-number 40
no digit-strip
direct-inward-dial
port 0/2/0
dial-peer voice 2050 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Fax 50**
destination-pattern 50
incoming called-number 50
no digit-strip
direct-inward-dial
port 0/2/2
dial-peer voice 2060 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Fax 60**
destination-pattern 60
incoming called-number 60
no digit-strip
direct-inward-dial
port 0/2/3
CME#

Hi Paolo.
Sorry for the delay. I was on holiday.
I would like to keep separate incoming calls from outgoing calls.
So I decided to keep two dial peers for every BRI interface.
I followed your suggestion on eliminate commands:
"incoming called-number" on FXSs,
various "progress_ind" on BRIs
Also I eliminated "direct-inward-dial" on FXSs,
Today I reconfigured and right tested the dial peers as following:
!   Bri Interfaces
dial-peer voice 1001 pots
description **Sends call to PSTN line 1-2**
destination-pattern 0T
port 0/0/0
dial-peer voice 2001 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN line 1-2**
destination-pattern 2929091..
incoming called-number .T
direct-inward-dial
port 0/0/0
dial-peer voice 1003 pots
description **Sends call to PSTN line 3-4**
destination-pattern 0T
port 0/0/1
dial-peer voice 2003 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN line 3-4**
destination-pattern 2929091..
incoming called-number .T
direct-inward-dial
port 0/0/1
dial-peer voice 1005 pots
description **Sends call to PSTN line 5-6**
destination-pattern 0T
port 0/1/0
dial-peer voice 2005 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN line 5-6**
destination-pattern 2929091..
incoming called-number .T
direct-inward-dial
port 0/1/0
!   FXS interfaces
dial-peer voice 2035 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Extension 35**
destination-pattern 35
no digit-strip
port 0/2/1
dial-peer voice 2040 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Extension 40**
destination-pattern 40
no digit-strip
port 0/2/0
dial-peer voice 2050 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Fax 50**
destination-pattern 50
no digit-strip
port 0/2/2
dial-peer voice 2060 pots
description **Receives calls coming from PSTN to Fax 60**
destination-pattern 60
no digit-strip
port 0/2/3
Thanks a lot Paolo. :-)
Giorgio.

CCA-UC560-call from UC560 phones to PBX phones the call is never established.

I have a UC560 which is in a location (remote site) and I have a PBX in other location (headquarters)
The extension of UC560 phones are 3xx y the PBX extensions are 2xx.
I have a Gateway which is connected to UC560 via trunk SIP and this gateway is connected
to PBX via H.323
The UC560 was configured with CCA.
When I call from PBX phones to UC560 phones the PBX phones ring but when the call is
answered the call is finished.
When I call from UC560 phones to PBX phones the call is never established. The PBX phones
don´t ring.
Can you help me with the configuration?

Hi Paolo and Alexander,
First thanks for your help and I apologize for the delay in response because I could not answer before.
I made some changes and now the situation is as follows:
-When I call from PBX phones to UC560 phones the UC560 phones ring and sometimes when the call is answered there are RTP packets (the call is fine) but sometimes when the call is answered there is no voice (there are not RTP packets).
-When I call from UC560 phones to PBX phones the PBX phones ring but in this case there is never voice (there are not RTP packets)
I captured traffic with the Wireshark and I saw the following:
- When the call is fine from PBX Phones to UC560 Phones in the protocol H.245 is opened a logical channel between the PBX and the Gateway H.323-SIP after Terminal Capability Set (Master Slave Determination).
But when the call is not fine because there are not RTP packets I see in the protocol H.245 that no logical channel is opened after between the PBX and the Gateway H.323-SIP after Terminal Capability Set (Master Slave Determination).
Is there some parameter about protocol H.245 on Cisco gateway H.323-SIP which I can change?
If you want I can send the captured traffic.
Regards

Is there anyway to correct the call back telephone number mentioned in the scheduled call from Apple?

I just had a call from Apple tech team regarding my iPhone not getting activated after inserting nano sim and they decided that my new unlocked iPhone5 needs replacement. I am already disappointed by Apple bcos of the delay in getting my new iPhone5 started and now declaring that the set I received is a faulty one and need replacement.
Again for replacement they have schedule another call from sales team and doing so they have mentioned the number which is not right. I told him to call me back on the same number but an email which i received post that call has a wrong phone number in it. It could not have gone worse.
Do anyone know how to change the call-back number to a scheduled call from apple?
Thanks,
AK

The devices that are listed are: 2 under the name of the device that synced incorrectly with mine and then 3 others that are not associated with my itouch. The name of the ipod, before the incorrect sycning is no longer under devices. It has been replaced with the incorrect one because I can see the serial # of my ipod under the wrong name.
The playlists that are in my itunes library are from an ipod that I used a few times before I took this one over... Which happens to be the ipod that took on the ID of my itouch.
Both of these ipods used to be my kids.. I used my sons a few times and then switched to my daughters. They each had their names attachted to their particular devices and now it just says my sons, which is the ipod that itunes was connecting to when all this happened. The really strange thing is my son doesnt use his ipod any longer and now uses his phone for music...So, it had been a while since that particular device was even synced to itunes!
I hope this helps!

Delayed to stablish a call from jabber to jabber

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for