Diff Internal order

Dear All,
Generall 4 types of internal orer
1.Over head
2.Production
3.Investment
4. Production
For Over head related I/O no settlement
All Prod related I/O settlement
All Investment related I/O no settlement
There is no Profitability I/O order in our project
For overhead related I/O some primary cost element created for go to CO-Pa purpose
My question is that why primary cost element created for some overhead related I/O and how it go to Co-Pa ?
There are other overhead related I/o but no promary cost element created why ?
I think when CWIP asset created investment I/O created tell me if i'm wrong ,if it is not settled wht is its requirement ?
Why some type of I/O settlement required some of them settlement not required Kindly clarify
Regards,
Debashis

Hi
Your questions are very broad ones.   Still I shall try to answer to point.
1) Primary cost   elements   capture the cost when the transaction are posted in FI or flow from MM or SD. If the said cost has to be captured in COPA, then in the settlement rule please define the same.
2) On why settlement is required for some IO and not for others ;
When creating the IO, in   TAB control data, select   ' statistical order'.   This means no settlement is possible for cost collected in the IO. s only present for info purposes.     Accordingly, if u want to settle cost to responsible cost center after the IO is complete, then do not   select ' statistical order'
Thanks
kamala

Similar Messages

Same internal order as old company code but in diff. controlling area

guys,
Internal Orders have to be extended new company code from old cocode which hv diff controlling areas.
How should i do it.

Hi,
Goto Order Manager KO04 and select the order which you want to transfer to new company code, and make changes like company code and controlling area in Internal order.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Settling investment internal orders to an asset (AA310 msg)

hi.
I am wondering if somebody can shed some light for me on the following:
let's say we have 2 investment internal orders (representing 2 different projects) which are to be settled to one asset.
for the 1st order the job was done and the status changed to TECO in 2010. Upon full settlement (KO8G, full ) the cost has been settled to an asset (from AuC) and the asset has been capitalized. the capitalization (aquisition) date was set to the end of the period (e.g. Dec 31, 2010).
the status of the 2nd order has been changed to TECO in 2011. Currently when I'm trying to do a full settlement of the 2nd IO (with KO8G, partial capilazation) I'm getting AA310 (asset value date in diff year) as far as the system is trying to default the asset value date to date when the IO status was chagned to TECO (2011). I do not want to default the asset value date on the KOG8 screen.
The question - what is wrong in my approach and what should I do in the case I have a second investment orders to settle to a final asset.
Sorry if I was not clear, i'm primarly an abaper but trying to understand some business processes related to internal orders and settlement. any information to understand this relationship would be appreciated.
thank you,
viktor

Creation of Internal Order- KO01
Maintain Settlement receiver as the AUC asset
Settle the Internal Order- KO88
Now the values have come to AUC asset
Distribution of AUC- AIAB
Enter the Settlement receiver as the Main Asset
Settlement of AUC- AIBU

Report Writer Missing Data for Cost Center+Investment Internal Order

Hi Gurus,
I have met a problem on Report writer. T-code KSBB -> Report for Cost Center Group by Cost Elements in diff months.
The report can be drilled down to call KSB1 to give line items on the cost element by cost center/group.
The problem is the drill-down report missed the line items for investment orders. ( Compared with manually use KSB1)
The overhead internal order line items are fine.
For example, document 001-Apr:
Dr. Cost Element 1009                 $900 -- BA 90 Cost Center 90000 Investment order 9001
     Cr. Other cost elements.                  $900
Document 002-Apr
Dr. Cost Element 1009                 $800 -- BA90 Cost Center 90000 Overhead order 7001
     Cr. Other cost elements                      $800
In KSBB report, the cost center group for 90000 in cost element 1009 in Apr only has $800.
And the drilled down report which called KSB1 has the line item for docuemnt 002.
However, when I run KSB1 directly, the total amount for cost element 1009 in cost center 90000 is $1700.
Here is what I checked:
1. I have my ABAPer checked the KSBB program and KSB1 program to debug them in DEV ( DEV and PRD has the same problem). The different to get the data is that in KSB1, it has selected a value type 11 ( Googled: field name is WRTTP, Down payments as expenses. In program: WRTTP means Statistically Actual ) and 04 ( Googled: Actual True Posting. In program: 04 in WRTTP means Actual posting).
But in KSBB, it only select 04 when I clicked the drill down report to call KSB1.
2. I am thinking that the cause was on different types of internal order:
Overhead internal orders are statistical orders. Investment orders are actual orders.
Could you help to throw some light on the problem?
Thank you very much.
Emma

Hi,
Cost Centre vise Report you can take from KSB1
Internal Order Vise Report you can take fro KOB1
Regards,
Sridhar Sha

Realised exchange difference by internal order

When clearing an open AP item with a payment, the realised exchange rate difference is posted to the P+L against the relevant cost centre (From the purchase order). However, the assigment to the internal order (also contained in the Purchase order) is lost.
Is there a way to determine the account assignment of the realised exchange postings?
Note:
The internal order (AUFNR) is an optional entry field in our exchange difference accounts.
The Realised exchange differences pick up the correct c ost centre from the invoice but not the Internal order
Thanks!

We once had a similar requirement - the only difference is that we wanted the exch. rate diff. to go to the WBS element (which is on the PO). All we did was to add WBS element as a document splitting characteristic in the following node in SPRO.
Financial Accounting (New) -> General Ledger Accounting (New) -> Business Transactions -> Document Splitting -> Define Document Splitting Characteristics for Controlling
And it worked!!!
You can add Order (AUFNR) and see if it serves your requirement.
Good luck!

Asset Module - Internal Order

Hi SAPians,
Client - UK Client- Super user has settled Internal Order with negative posting.
In Asst Acctg - Auc is updated with diff figures in Book Dep Area and Tax Dep Area. All these transactions are posted in 2005-2006. Now while settling the Auc to Main Asset in current period, unable to settle since Book & Tax area is imbalanced.
How do I proceed further........Pl help.
Praba

Haven't tried this under AUC but have in other transactions.
Go into Tcode OAYA. Select the Transaction type to be used for the posting. Enter the depreciation areas and click the box "Display for selection." This will allow you to select the depr. area and view/edit the costs that will be posted. If this works then great....If not tell us the exact error message you are receiving.

Which table stores CO Internal Order Status

Hi Guys,
I am changing Internal Order status, but can't find the respective field in RESB table.
AUFK status fields are not even changed !
Any idea Which table records internal order status changes ?
Cheers

Hi.. COAS is a view of AUFK..
COAS suppose to store the status.. which has 4 diff. status fields..
But those fields are not updated when there is a status change in Internal Order..
Cheers

Internal Order vs Work order

Hi Gurus,
What are the differences between an internal order and a work order? How can a work order differ to an internal order?
I already understand that work orders do not have a hierarchy, groups, commitments, plans or budgets.
Thanks for your help and Happy New Year!!
Regards,
Catherine

Hi,
Please find below the some differences:
Maintenance order-
1.You can create the with reference to Equipment/Functional Location.
2.You can assign the Work center
3.You can assign the permit
Internal Order:
1.You can maintain the Budgets
2.You will have Commitments
3.We will have hierarchy, groups
The main difference is the Maintenance order is to capture and monitor the maintenance related activities and the Internal Order is mainly for costing purpose like assigning Budget, Settlement...etc.
Regards,
Manish
Edited by: Manish Kumar Agarwal on Jan 2, 2009 1:00 PM

Differences in parallel currencies after settlement internal order

Hi everybody,
Please help me with any tip.
After the settlement of internal order, the balance of currency of the company (10-BRL) is zero, it is OK, but the problem is the balance in hard currency (40-USD) there is difference.
Scenario Currency FI (OB22):
> 1st local currency:
Crcy Type: 10 - company code currency - Currency: BRL
Valuation: 0 Legal Valuation
ExRateType: M - Standard translation at average rate.
Srce curr: 1 - Translation taking transaction currency as a basis
TrsDte typ: 3 Translation date
> 2st local currency:
Crcy type: 40 - Hard currency
Valuation: 0 - Legal Valuation
ExRateType: M - Standard translation at average rate
Srce curr.: 1 - Translation taking transaction currency as a basis
TrsDte typ: 1 - Document date
Scenario Currency CO (OKKP):
> Assignment Control > CoCd->CO Area = Cross-company-code cost accounting
Currency Type:10 - Company code currency
Currency: BRL
No flag : Diff. CCode Currency
No flag: Active
The test is:
1st - Posting with internal order (FB60)
2nd - Settlement internal order (KO88)
3rd - FBL3N
Look the result by currency:
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 30/11/09, Doc Date: 27/11/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00-, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 666,67-
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 27/11/09, Doc Date:01/10/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 500,00
Balance of LCurr: BRL = 0,00
Balance of LCurr2: USD = 166,67 (Difference). Is there a procedure to dealing with differences in hard currency (USD) after settlement of internal order?
Tks
Soraia

In your opinion, Does the configuration in OKKP is correct?
Scenario Currency CO (OKKP):
> Assignment Control > CoCd->CO Area = Cross-company-code cost accounting
Currency Type:10 - Company code currency
Currency: BRL (Brazilian Currency)
No flag : Diff. CCode Currency
No flag: Active
Where is BRL I think that should be USD.
The system do the exchange rate ok, but what about the difference because of it? Is there any problem continue with it?
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 30/11/09, Doc Date: 27/11/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00-, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 666,67-
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 27/11/09, Doc Date:01/10/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 500,00
Balance of LCurr: BRL = 0,00
Balance of LCurr2: USD = 166,67 (Difference).
Thank you!
Soraia

Open Items in GR/IR Account Internal Order wise

Hi,
Is it possible to view Open Items in GR/IR Account Internal Order wise?. We are assigning Internal Order in Goods Receipt and want to view Open items for the particular Order.
Regards,
Amanullah

Thanks for your response.
I already review the accounting and is pretty fine.
The system creates document type WE and RE for the Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt.
Unfortunately in transaction FBLN the system shows as a Open Item, and honestly I don't know the reason.
I really appreciate any help for this issue.
Regards.

Problem in creation of Internal Order

Dear Experts,
We've configured Asset Accounting in Development server for our newly implemented Company but the problem is when I'm going to create Internal Order (T-code: KO01) our company not showing there. Fyki, we've three CO area like MGH0, MGHI and MGHP but when I'm going to KO01 it is showing only those companies which are under MGHI only.
Would you please advise us, whether I left any configuration or not. Please also let me know how can I solve this issue.
Thanks in advance and your suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards.
Ripon Paul

Dear Both,
Thank you very much. Yes I found my problem.
Best Regards.
Ripon Kumar Paul

Purchase order to Asset non imposed the Internal Order.

I'm entering a purchase order of an asset tied to an internal order of investment. The order has a budget X. If I enter a purchase order with value greater than the amount budgeted in the internal order, the system allows me to create the request and not imposed the internal order. In the report S_ALR_87013019, the order has no value released.
How can the system do not allow the purchase of assets with values greater than estimated and how to make that encumbers the purchase order and appear in the report S_ALR_87013019?
This only happens in the purchases of assets!
Thanks in advanced!
GLMacedo

My friend, see my answer to witch point.
1. Your Asset APC account should be Category 90 (Statistical) Cost element
The Internal Order is Statistical (I see in KO03). Should I verify in another place?
2. your Internal Order must be of category "Investment" and not "Overhead"
OK
3. Assign this Internal order in your Asset Master in the field "Investment Order"and not "Internal Order"....
OK
if Investment Order is not visible in Asset Master, change your screen layout of the asset and plug it in (IMG > AA > Master Data > Screen layouts)
4. Do settings in T code ACSET - Allow EAUFN for Trn Type = *, Acct Assign Type = APC Postings, and check the Acct Assgn check box
I don´t know how can I do this. How Can I Do?
Allow commitment management in your contr area OKKP and in your Internal order type (KOT2_OPA)
My type Order (investment) in KOT2_OPA is OK (commitment management was allowed). But in OKKP it is not! It is a critical setting. Should I flag this field?
6. Feield Status Group of Asset must allow CO/PP Order in OBC4
OK
Thank you very much!

SAP Report to track cost by Internal Order

Hi Expert,
for audit purpose, I want to track the Cost by Internal Order, please suggest me in sap have any report to track down?
below format is an example.
release code cost center internal order number PR number PO number SES number vendor name desc of item cost of item
Thanks.

Hi Pal,
Many Thanks for your input, as per your recommendation
Mani as you suggested ME2K was working fine, but anyway we need to drill down further to double of each field.
As Nico suggested building a query, to view all at a same time is good & perfect to use.
So please suggest me, what are the tables and fields map to build a query? because Itu2019s very easy for me to assign fast.
Regards,

Including down payment made to vendor in the internal order

Hi all
My requirement is like this.
We use IM and IO(Capex orders) for procuring and capitalising assets. We are able to assign all the costs of procuring assets (both APC and incidental expenses to the internal order). We use purchase orders and assign the internal order while raising purchase order.
Sometimes we do make Down payments(advances) without raising purchase orders. My question is how to include this down payment made in the internal order. We cannot assign any internal order while making the down payment. But, can we include this down payment made to vendor in the internal order(commitment) while making down payment or after that.
FYI:I came to know that there is some functionality in Controlling (Project systems) where we can assign the down payment made to the internal order after making payment.But, i do not know how to do that.
Pls somebody reply me.
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Vishnu
VST-IT.
Pls somebody answer my query.

The functionality is available in Controlling. I dont know about PS.
I need to know how to do it.
Regards
vishnu
Pls anybody suggest me on this issue.

Vendor line item display with internal order

In Vendor line item display is it possibe to see details of the line item of offsetting account .
For example a expense account is debited & vendor account is credited .At the time expense account debit a internal order has been assigned in line item.
User wants to see the vendor line item display ( T code FBL1N) with details of internal order appearing in open line items display etc .
Is this possible .I created a layout with order as a field but order does not show any values in the line display of vendor.
Please revert back if this can be possibe.
Thanks
Manoj

with a combination of notes
112312 - Line item - Display of offsetting ac information
373268 - Line item - new display field
569939 - Line item - Open FI - Absolute amounts
1034354 - FAGLL03 - Display of offsetting account information
you should be able to get it there.

Diff Internal order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for