Difference impact on Net Value

Hi All,
Similar questions have been answered but this has not solved my queries so I have to post.
the user wants to post the difference in amount received and invoice amount in some loss account. this is happening but in doing this, I have to give that difference condition as Non-static in V/08 which changes my net value of document. is it correct??
Usually, Net value is material price +/- any discount/surcharge etc. exclusive of Tax. but after I receive my Invoice amount that is Net value + tax, the customer still gives amount lesser than the final invoice amount. and my user wants to post this shortfall as loss(or write off). should it impact the net value? currently, it is effecting it. the example is :
1000 Rs. MRP (ERL) (this includes all discount)
10 Rs. Vat (MW1)
1010 Rs. Invoice amount.
1008 Rs. Paid by customer Mr.X
all these entries are getting posted as :
Mr. X 1008 Dr
write off 02 Rs. Dr
Sales Revenue 1000 Cr
Vat 10 Cr
Now, in doing this, the Net value of this sales doc becomes 998 Rs instead of 1000. is this correct?
Thanks,
Binita

Hi santosh
Sub total will the PR00 - Discount sum
Net price will be Sub total - Special discount
how do I mention that sub total will be PR00 - Discount. I configure like this
10 PR00
20 ABC (Customer discount)
30 XYZ (Material discount)
40 Discount Sum from20 to39
50 Sub total
60 123 (Special Discount)
70 Net price
80 MWST (output tax)
90 Total
when I indicate from 20 to 39 besides Discount Sum, system will sum the discounts between step 20 to 39. How do I write at sub total like this, so that system will deduct the discount sum from PR00. Similary how do I write Sub total - Special discount.
Could you please explain bit more detail.
Thank you.

Similar Messages

Difference in the net value of item

Dear Experts,
In T code VF11 The net value for an item in the invoice is coming differently at the header level and the line item level.
At line item level the value is showing correctly as 16,655,113.39 INR (9553.785 units @ 1743.30 per unit )
But at the header level it is showing as 5474833.65. As a result the user is not able to cancel the invoice.
I have checked the accounting of the same but couldnt locate any error.
Can anybody help me on this.
Regards,
Sudish

Usually X* structures are indicator for new and changed lines (like thay looked before change), and Y* structures are changes.
Pls try to change YFPLA/YFPLT, not XFPLA/XFPLT in option 3.
Sorry, maybe I didnt explain 2nd option... It starts when customer something payed (it is not necessary same value as planed, and it is good user-exit for recalculation in that case)... it is not what do you have right now... but maybe next problem...

Differenct between Net Value and Document Value on a sales order

Can someone please explain what is the difference between the Net Value that we see on the sales order (VA03) and the 'Document Value' thats checked against in Dynamic credit checking?
Thanks

In transaction FD32, you maintain credit limit for customer and assign risk category for the customer.
In transaction OVA8, there are two main types of checks - Static or Dynamic.
System checks the following for arriving at customers credit status-
Static credit check - It compares the credit limit assigned to the customer to the total value of open sales orders, plus the total value of open deliveries not yet invoiced, plus the total value of open billing documents not yet passed on to accounting, plus the total value of billing documents that have been passed on to accounting, but which have not yet been paid by the customer.
Dynamic credit check - It compares customeru2019s credit limit to the total of open sales orders not yet delivered, plus the total value of open deliveries not yet invoiced, plus the total value of open billing documents not yet passed onto accounting, plus the total value of billing documents that have been passed onto accounting, but which have not yet been paid by the customer. In addition you can use Horizon functionality also.
You can perform additional checks in addition to dynamic or static credit check. One of them is document value check.
If you check this box then a additional credit check is done when the maximum document value assigned is exceeded. This is useful if business requires that all sales orders above a certain limit are to be blocked.
In your case, the document value is $0.00.
So system is not doing any additional credit check.
It would just do Dynamic or Static credit check with relevant assignment maintained in transaction FD32 for the said customer.

Difference in Net value

Hi all,
The actual net sales price and the net sales price appearing in s.o. screen (front) are different. Eg If net sales price is 5/- , the main screen reflects 5.30 as net value - the difference is because it is adding the insurance conditoin value 0.30 also to the net price. What must be the cause of this? System should ideally reflect only the net sales price. (net sales price is determined through condition record only).
Early guideline will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mamta

Hi Mamata,
Make your insurance condition type stastical in pricing procedure.
Regards
Sanjay

Post to GL but no impact to sales net value

Dear SD Gurus,
I have a condition type which calculates the value from net value (says, 10% from gross value, for instance) that needs to post to GL (not statistical) and it will not impact the total sales net value.
Any idea how to set it up?
Thanks,
Soo

Hi
check the settings once again plz
Goto Basic function-Account determinationRevenue account determination-Define and assign account keys-select assign account keys-here u hv to select right pricing procedure-condition type----Account keys....
Hope it ll work properly.
Regards
JAGA

Free goods by header net value not Quantity

Regards
My client wants to make a sales promotions as the free goods SD. The difference is that free goods should not be given by the bought quantity of certain material, they should be given from the header net value of an order.
For example:
If a customer have an order with header net value of 100$ from only materials that has certain material pricin group, it should receive one free good.( All the materials in the order have the same material pricing group)
If a customer have an order with header net value of 200$ from only materials that has certain material pricin group, it should receive two free goods.
If there are ways to make this happen please let me know i would really appreciate it.
Thanks
Edited by: Ronald Caroli on Feb 13, 2008 9:13 PM

Hi ronald,
The userexit option is very tough to do.
You are using a right userexit, but how are you coding it? Whats your design and flow?
The BDC are programmable recordings of a standard transaction. Hence you will be able to record the way in which you add a line item to sales order. Ths recording is automatically converted into lines of code by SAP. Then you insert your checks and balances between these lines of code to make it behave the way you want the sequence of transactions to work.
My thought was to make a recording of adding a new line item, in change sales order transaction(va02), with item category as Free of Charge(FOC). Then in the code, I wanted to check for material pricing group, if found correct, then would go finding the net value of sales document. If the value is above the limit, calculate the target quantity. Then follow the rest of the recording and add a new line with FOC as item category.
But this was a seperate transaction, which could be applied seperately and not to be done automatically in sales order. This was becuase say if you switch off the promotion tomorrow, then you will not have to worry abt removing the same functionality from sales order, you just need to de-activate the transaction.
Then there would be issues of doing hardcoding the net value limits, free good quantity in the user exit which is not at all recommended.
Hope this helps.
Abhishek

Differences between Contract Cumulative Value an Release Orderes Value

Hi All
I have found differences in: EKPO (PO Items) and EKAB (Release Orders) tables vs. Cumulative Target Contract value.
The total amount in EKPO net values is grather than Cumulative Target Value in Contract, in EKAB net values as well.
Do you know the considerations that the system are taking?....because the Cumulative value must not be exceeded
Thanks for your tiime.
Regards
Mauricio

I have found the issue, the delivery complete indicator restore the Cumulative Amount in Value Contracts (Quantity = 0). After that, a new PO could be created with Agreement link limited for the amount restored.
So the all PO generated related with the contract could exceed the Cumulative Amount established in contract
Thatu2019s a problem because All PO could be received even though the delivery complete was activated
This behavior is only for Value Contracts
Saludos
Mauricio

Net value of sales order before saving in VA01

Hi there,
I'm currently working with the transaction VOFM whereby i need to get the <b>net value</b> of the current sales order in order to compare with a deposit value which the customer has made.
a condition type is activated whenever the net value is < the deposit which the customer makes,i.e when sy-subrc EQ 0.
My problem is that the routine in VOFM(where i have added my code),is triggered before i save the order, hence all i get as net value is always 0.00. That routine is again triggered after i save as well, but it doesnt work as i expected even if i get the net value then.
I have in fact used the routine USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP of include MV45AFZZ, where i could get the net value from the field XVBAK-NETWR <b>after saving the order</b>.
i thought that now it gets the right value, it'l work as expected but the fact that the VOFM routine is triggered before saving(hence net value 0.00), the condition type doesn't change after i save.
Hence, my condition type is not being applied properly because the condition type is being activated already when it get the net value 0.00.
Can anyone please tell me if there is a way to get the net value before saving?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Meenakshi

Hi,
I have in fact used export flag to memory in FORM USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP from which i get the net value after saving.
In fact, i have figured out the problem but still cannot solve it.
What happens i that the VOFM routine is triggered more than once, hoewever, the first time it is triggered, i still havent got that net value. In this pass, when the routine ends, sy-subrc eq 0. Upon the next pass to the VOFM routine, i set sy-subrc to 4(condition type not activated), however the result is wrong. The condition type is activated still.
if i do the contrary, i.e set sy-subrc to 4 on the first pass to VOFM routine and then set sy-subrc to 0 second time(condition type needs be activated), the condition type is not activated.
what i dont understand is why the VOFM routine is only keeping the initial value of sy-subrc?Any ideas?
Also, am doing my validations and setting sy-subrc in the form kobev_900.
Am not using the form kobed_900 at all. Does this make a difference?
Also, how can i do the validation only when repricing was called form SAVE process?How do i put the condition?
Thanks for the help.
Meenakshi

Net value and assesable value

Dear Experts,
In Import pricing procedure we different pricing condition like
1.PACKING AND FORWARDING
2. SUPPLIER INSURANCE
3. OCCAN/ AIR FRIGHT CHARGES
4.IMPORT INSURANCE
5. LANDING CHARGES
to obtain NET VALUE which are pricing condiion value has to added
Please tell me what is difference between Net VALUE and ASSESABLE VALUE,
THIS

Hi,
Net value is basic material price with includes all delivery cost & fright.
Asseable value is
Basic price (% of material value) depent on product & chapter ID. (Custom will provide abetment for product)
Fright (Import)
Insurence cost
Landing cost 1%
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 9, 2010 4:19 PM

Invoice correction (RK) change sales net value

Hi Experts,
I wanted to create an invoice correction process, after i was entering with reference to the billing document number i have seen 2 item category there were G2N and L2N.
material              qty                cat            value
1234                    2                 G2N           18.40
1234                    2                 L2N            18.40-
1) System will auto create with 2 item category, is it true?
2) How can i change the net value? Because the actual value suppose is 17.00
Thanks & Regards,
Yong Kok Wah

Hi
Invoice correction Request is a combination of Credit memo Request and Debit memo Request, which has got Item category G2N and L2N respectively. They have opposite signs to one another.
That means, each item is duplicated as Credit posting and Debit posting with opposite signs as you can see in the Overview screen.
Therefore, initially the Net value is "Zero", as there is no difference.
Now, you can make the correction / changes via the "Debit memo" items only. You can not make any changes through the Credit memo items (they are disabled area).
If, you want to change the quantity, you can do it in the Overview screen itself.
If, you want to change the Price, then select the item > go to item details > select "Condition" tab and make the chages here > come back to the overview screen.
Now, click on the "Delete unchanged pair" button in the application tool bar.
System will delete the unchanged pairs and only the changed pairs will remain.
The resulting difference (of Credit item and Debit item) will be automatically reflected in the "Net value" field for which you have to issue a Credit memo to the customer.

Implementation of Note 80183 for Rounding: "QTY * Net Price = Net Value"

Dear All.
We're reviewing adding in note 80183 to handle some rounding issues.
Basically, our "QTY * Net Price = Net Value" is not adding up due to some rounding in determining the Net Price off the Net Value.
The note looks like the right answer, and there are already some very good threads posted on this topic.
What I'm hoping to find though is if someone has implemented the note, and what they found?
(1) Any issues encountered? Any impact to other functionality - Credit Checks, etc....
(2) Any additional changes needed to the alternative calculation type or alternative base value provided?
(3) Any additional requirements or customizations needed?
(4) Any issues with Account Assignment posting, or output (invoice or order confirmation)?
(5) General feedback on how easily implemented.
Many thanks!

HI,
The note: 1668972 - ME 083: Enter Net Price for value contract w. future dates has been modified in Jan 2014 and the correction instruction for even EHP 6 is included. Please check whether the correction instruction 1417190 already exists in your system. If not, apply the note.
If you are getting the same error even after applying the note, you may raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT

Invoice created with wrong net values at header & item

Hi Guys
Due to a wrong user exit, system created few invoices with wrong net values at header & item.
Now system does not allow to cancel those billing documents, showing error message - inconsistency in data.
Eg: Billing Header net value is 10000
Billing Item net value is 5000
when I try to cancel this billing document, cancellation document created with header net value as 5000 & item net value also 5000. So, it says original invoice & cancellation invoice having different values. It is not possible to cancel.
Please suggest me how to correct wrong values at original invoice, which are already released to Accounting. Or else, how to cancel those kind of invoices.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Uma

Hi,
In the original invoice and cancellation invoie is created there is a difference in 5000. It will not allow further cancellation of the invoice because it is already cancelled. I don't know whether there is anyway to reverse the cancellation invoice document.
If it is there then reverse the cancel invoice document and create an invoice correction request document (RK)
Try to replicate the scenario in your test system.
Prase

Net value diferences

Hi Friends,
Scenario is S.O - Delivery - Invoice - Return Order - Return Delivery - Return Invoice.
Here net value shows diffrently in Invoice - Return Order and Return Invoice.
Invoice it is showing net value 159, return Order it shows net value 157 and again in return invoice net value shows 158.
I have checked all the conditions and found that changes in frieght condition. It shows different values in Invoice, Return order and Return Invoice.
can any one tell me what would be the reason showing different values in frieght condition while it is coping values from Invoice.
Regards
Sasikanth.Ch

dear Friend,
Kindly check whether any Rounding off setting is Active in FI or in SD module, If so there may be some difference when ever you do a new calculation or copy some data.
regards,
Sudhir

Contract net value problem

Hi,
I created a material PO for net value 100 eur for a contract
of target VALUE 1000 eur.Now i create a GR for
that PO for 50 EUR.Now i set the delivery completed
indicator,then i can set contract net value gets updated to 50 EUR.
Now i created a service contract and service PO with
same target value and net value
But in the case of service po,i create a service entry sheet for 50 EUR,then contract net value is not getting updated to 50 EUR.
Why it behaves differently for material and service POs?

I have Simulated your issue..
I have Created a Service Contract with Line Item 'D" for 1000 INR.
Later I have raised release Order for 200 INR..
as soon as the Release Order was approved , the Net Value in Contract updated to " 200 INR"..
Still SES is pending for that...
If you want I can send you screen shot...

Contract net value for Header Statistics is not correct

There is issue with value contract. The net value for Header Statistics is not showing correctly for some contracts. Especially, when we delete the PO line items or reverse all entries (GR and IR) for PO line item.
Contract has one line with account category ‘U’. The target value is 300,000.00 and total quantity released to date is 160,000. The net value for Header Statistics should be 140,000 but it is showing 600,000 which is over (double) the target value and user cannot release any further PO reference to this contract.
Earlier I defined net price for line item 300,000 and I changed net price to zero and execute report RM06ENP0 but it doesn’t work.
Please share your experience and thoughts.
Thanks,
Shah.

Hi Jurgen,
There are few Purchace orders with multiple line items and each line item for Purchase orders referencing the same line and same contract.
There is only one Purchase order has two deleted lines against this contract.
Theses deleted line's net price has changed to zero and there is no PO history.
Contract released order value is correct as there is only one line, but net price is wrong. and user is getting error for target value is excedeed by $nnn when trying to create purchase order.
Thanks,
Shah.

Difference impact on Net Value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for