Difference in Actual and Test Run - Depreciation

Using SAP 4.7
When my user run the depreciation run in test mode, the result comes different while if he do it in actual result comes different.
Mind it, the depreciation run (actual) is run in background.
Can Please somebody help me out in this regard.
Regards
Sajid Hakeem

Hi,
Same way as you do Actual Run
- AFAB-> Enter Parametres->Click Test Run->Execute in Background (F9) or Choose from Menu bar ->Program ->Execute in Background
Rgds.

Similar Messages

Olioweb QOS error and Test Run is not compliant

Hi,
I made 3 tile setup and test is failing for Olioweb QOS. When I run first 2 tile, test runs fine and run is compliant. Later I ran oly 3rd tile and test run is compliant without any issue.
When I start all 3 tiles together I get olioWeb QOS error for first 2 tiles. Sometimes all 3 tiles gives OlioWeb QOS error.
Attached the result.
Please look into it and let me know if anthing need to be changed in setup.
Thanks,
Suresh

jpschnee,
I have run only olioweb workload for all the three tiles and I do not see any failure in Olioweb.wrf. I have attached the result for the run. It looks like clean run when only Olioweb load is ran.
Again I ran the 3 tile for all workloads . I observed QOS error happens for all three tiles. i.e olioweb workloads. previosuly only for 2 tiles it gave QOS error.
I am trying to find the subsystem which is saturating in my setup. As I asked I am expecting some alarms from Vcenter when resources peaks to its max.
I am seeing CPU is taking less than 70% in all ESXi Servers. Memory less than 20%.
Disk Max latency is less than 20ms.
Network is max 500Mbps for 10G network connectivity.
Do you see above resource utilization problematic?>
Thanks,
Suresh

Cj44 and "test run"

Hi ABAP experts,
I'm calling CJ44 Tcode in my program via "call transaction". Afterwards I doing my own other things.
How can I get the value of "Test run" checkbox so I can run "my own things" only if the real run is performed?
Any idea, suggestion?
Thanks

jpschnee,
I have run only olioweb workload for all the three tiles and I do not see any failure in Olioweb.wrf. I have attached the result for the run. It looks like clean run when only Olioweb load is ran.
Again I ran the 3 tile for all workloads . I observed QOS error happens for all three tiles. i.e olioweb workloads. previosuly only for 2 tiles it gave QOS error.
I am trying to find the subsystem which is saturating in my setup. As I asked I am expecting some alarms from Vcenter when resources peaks to its max.
I am seeing CPU is taking less than 70% in all ESXi Servers. Memory less than 20%.
Disk Max latency is less than 20ms.
Network is max 500Mbps for 10G network connectivity.
Do you see above resource utilization problematic?>
Thanks,
Suresh

Capturing the difference between Actual and planned time

Hii...
I have created and released a production order which contains 25 operations and qty: 3 nos. I have done operation confirmation for 0010 operation as 2.5 hours (where as planned time is 1.5 hours). I would like to know how to get a report which can show the difference between actual & planned times.
And also I would like to know the operation time 1.5 hours which entered ny me was for operation of 1 number qty or its for 3 quantities.
Best regards,
Haneesh R

>
Haneesh Ramisetty wrote:
>
>
> "Order quantity is 3 Nos and operation time is 1.5 hours (for 1 qty). But in routing I have entered for the 0010 operation as 1.5 hours, my doubt is, how system will consider, time 1.5 hours is time for operation of 1 number qty or its for 3 quantities."
>
>
>
if you maintained in routing 1 qty = 1.5 hrs, when you create production order qty 3 = 3 * 1.5 hrs so total 4.5 hrs for that operation 0010 to completed
regards,
sankaran

Export java code out of database? difference between Prod and Test

Hi all,
I'm a seasoned DBA, but I have never really dealt with Java, so this is all new to me. Within one of my test databases (10.2.0.3.0), I have a database package - within the package is a procedure that has this Java call:
language java name 'com.clinapps.pmd.etl.interfaces.forecasting.itemtrial.helper.SSFItemOutboundPMDHelper.processSSFItemInterface()';
This Java code goes and exports a file to .xml format. The basic problem is that in our Test environment, there is a problem in the xml file that gets generated - the second line is missing the first few characters. However, in all of our other environments, including Production and Validation, it all works fine - the xml file is good. What has me confused, is that we've done several database refreshes, where we export from production, then import it down to test. So from everything I'm looking at, the schema is exactly the same - but something is different, causing the issue in the xml file that is being generated. I was wondering if I could get into the database and export the Java code, then that is something where I could confirm if there's a difference or not, from Prod to Test.
Does anyone have any input/feedback on how to do this? I've been googling, and tried several methods, including dbms_metadata.get_ddl, and DBMS_JAVA.EXPORT_SOURCE, but I can't get anything to work.
Or if anyone has any other thoughts on how to debug/troubleshoot this, I'd appreciate any ideas!!
Thank you from a Java newbie!!

OK, that is helping me get somewhere!! If I change the query to this, I am getting results:
select obj_num,long_name from SYS."KU$_JAVA_CLASS_VIEW" where LONG_NAME like '%SSFItemOutboundPMDHelper%';
171879
com/clinapps/pmd/etl/interfaces/forecasting/itemtrial/helper/SSFItemOutboundPMDHelper
Note that it has the / instead of the . as the differentiator
Now if I do the second query, I see this:
SQL> select * from SYS."KU$_JAVA_OBJNUM_VIEW" where OBJ_NUM=171879;
OBJ_NUM DATAOBJ_NUM OWNER_NUM OWNER_NAME
NAME NAMESPACE SUBNAME
TYPE_NUM TYPE_NAME CTIME MTIME
STIME STATUS REMOTEOWNER
LINKNAME
FLAGS OID SPARE1 SPARE2 SPARE3
SPARE4
SPARE5
SPARE6
171879 123 PMD50
/34bae3f1_SSFItemOutboundPMDHe 1
29 JAVA_CLASS 2012-06-28 10:44:22 2012-06-28 10:44:22
2012-06-28 10:44:22 1
8 6 65535
Any thoughts on where to go from here??

What is the difference between start() and run()

Hi:
what is the difference between start() and the run()???
in my app, i have
Console.debug( "starting thread to listen for clients" );
_server = new Server( this );
_server.start();
_server extends Thread..
why everytime i use server.start(); my app will terminate on it is own, even though in my servr.run() method, i have a while loop
and if i call _server.run() explicitly in my code, that while loop will be in execution
can someone let me know??
thnx

what is the difference between start() and the
run()???start() is a method on Thread that tells it to start.
run() is a method in the object that the thread executes.
why everytime i use _server.start(); my app will
terminate on it is own, Err.... I'm not convinced this is true. It'll throw an IllegalThreadStateException, if you try to restart an existing thread.
If that's what you're saying.
even though in my _servr.run()
method, i have a while loopI don't see the connection. Are you saying that the while loop never terminates, and you don't see why the thread is terminating?
and if i call _server.run() explicitly in my code,
that while loop will be in executionIf you call server.run() explicitly, then run() will be executed in the same thread that you called it in.

Difference between plan,actual and target in order

hi
plz tell me ans.
In the manufacturing order WHAT is the difference PLAN, ACTUAL and TARGET.
In the CK11N, we will estimate plan cost for one finished product but in order we are taking 2 costing variant that is PRODUCTION ORDER PLANDED (PPP1) and PRODUCTION ORDER ACTUAL(PPP2) . in the ORDER calculation which is taken as an account and tell me their functionality separately
thank u
sowmya

Plan Cost means this is the cost of Product or Material or Activity or any others statistical price which we estimate and Plan prices for organizations future activities.
Actual cost is the original/Actual cost we incurred for Product or Material or Activity or any other.
Target cost are the costs that are expected for a certain operating rate. It is the dynamic value which will be calculated on the basis Operating rate (Operating rate = (Actual activity / Plan activity) X 100), and It is a consistent basis useful for comparisons of the plan and actual costs of a period.
Ex:
we plan $110 per hour of Labor activity.
but we incurred $125 as actual cost.
for this Target cost is (125/110)*100=113
We use Costing variant for plan to calculate plan price of Order.
when order is created system posts planned costs to the order according to standard cost estimate of product, which uses the planned cost variant.
when the production is carried out Actual costs are posted to the order using Costing variant for actual. when order is completed system uses this two values to calculate the variance of production order. which can be settled to FI.
Hope U got...

Difference between standard and actual activity rates

Dear All,
My client is having a process in which while downloading KOB1 the system is giving report of all the process orders wise activities confirmed in that month against some cost center.
Now when i am going into line item it takes me to process order confirmation display where activiies to be confirmed and activities yet to be confirmed are displayed.
After that cost center report S_alr_87013611 is displayed wherein actual rates(quantity ) is displayed for that activities.
Now the system shows difference between actual and standard activities.
The difference is the calculated in excel on the basis of KOB1 report and difference is loaded process order wise on calculation done in excel through LSMW (for transaction KB21n) wherein difference quantity is posted from cost center to process order.
Now client needs automation in the sense that no excel calculation should be done and difference should be posted for that month for each process order in the ratio calculated in excel.
Kindly provide any solutions if any, avaliable in standard or Z development has to be done.
Thanks and Regards,
VLM

Dear AP,
Have you any idea about how in above case Z development is to be done?
Regards,
VLM

AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.

Hi Friends,
i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
We have opened FI periods as well.
My question is that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
I request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
Best Regards,
Padmaja

Hi,
Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Padmaja
Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

How can we report off of Test Run Custom Fields in e-Manager?

I'm trying to create reports within Crystal Reports or via SQL Reporting Services to report on test runs and I want to include data from the test run custom fields I've created. I can not find a correlation to link the test runs and the test run custom fields in the DB. Is this even possible?
I can see the related custom field data in e-Manager for each run history. I was thinking there should be some sort of table in the DB to link the data but I can not find it.
Please help
Thanks

You cannot get this from the interface. We added SqlServer Management Studio Express and granted read only access to project managers. They found the view dbo.View_Tests useful in that it connected custom fields to the test cases. There are similar views for requirements and test runs.
Studio Express is found: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=C243A5AE-4BD1-4E3D-94B8-5A0F62BF7796&displaylang=en#QuickInfoContainer
You'll need to get access from your DBA and set up an ODBC connection.
Here's a sample query that we've used -- probably doesn't fit your situation but it might get you thinking. Part of it was stolen from another posting to QA zone -- so I figured -- might as well share the wealth:
-- Overall input parameters:
declare @project as integer;
set @project = '20'
declare @iteration as varchar(500);
set @iteration = 'Iteration 1';
declare @team as varchar(500);
set @team = 'SFS';
-- Data on a particular iteration
declare @iteration_tests_run as decimal(10,2);
set @iteration_tests_run = ( select count(*)
                         from dbo.View_Tests A
                         where A.ProjectID = @project
                         and A.Iteration = @iteration
                         and A.Team_test <> 'NULL'
                         and A.LastResult <> 'Not Run');
declare @iteration_tests_passed as decimal(10,2);
set @iteration_tests_passed=( select count(*)
                         from dbo.View_Tests A
                         where A.ProjectID = @project
                         and A.Iteration = @iteration
                         and A.Team_test <> 'NULL'
                         and A.LastResult = 'Passed');
declare @iteration_any_results as decimal(10,2);
set @iteration_any_results=( select count(*)
          from dbo.View_Tests A
          where A.ProjectID = @project
          and A.Team_test <> 'NULL');
-- Data on a particular team's tests for a particular iteration
declare @team_tests_run_by_iteration as decimal(10,2);
set @team_tests_run_by_iteration = (
select count(*)
                         from dbo.View_Tests A
                         where A.ProjectID = @project
                         and A.Team_test = @team
                         and A.Iteration = @iteration
                         and A.LastResult <> 'Not Run');
declare @team_tests_passed_by_iteration as decimal(10,2);
set @team_tests_passed_by_iteration = (
                         select count(*)
                         from dbo.View_Tests A
                         where A.ProjectID = @project
                         and A.Iteration = @iteration
                         and A.Team_test = @team
                         and A.LastResult = 'Passed');
declare @team_tests_any_results_by_iteration as decimal(10,2);
set @team_tests_any_results_by_iteration = (
select count(*)
                         from dbo.View_Tests A
                         where A.ProjectID = @project
and A.iteration = @iteration
                         and A.Team_test = @team );
-- Progress in completion and success of tests in a particular iteration
select (@iteration_tests_run / @iteration_any_results ) * 100 as Iteration_1_percent_complete;
select (@iteration_tests_passed / @iteration_tests_run ) * 100 as Iteration_1_percent_success;
-- Progress in completion and success of tests for a particular test team in a particular iteration
select (@team_tests_run_by_iteration / @team_tests_any_results_by_iteration ) * 100 as SFS_percent_complete_Iteration_1;
select (@team_tests_passed_by_iteration / @team_tests_run_by_iteration ) * 100 as SFS_percent_success_Iteration_1;

Asset   Depreciation - In test Run Value got posted

Hi All ,
1. I did the test run in 'AFAB' . SAP throwed the error becasue of some problem in Cost Center.
2. So i fixed that bug and tried again .
3. But when i see the Asset Explorer for that asset '1234', Asset value of the Error Doc got posted in 'Test Run'. How can i able to reverse back that asset value which got posted.
I want to know, why it got posted eventhough i selected the " Test Run ".
I want to reverse back that posted value . (onlyError Doc got posted). Or I want to do the depreciation without this asset number '1234'. How can i block that asset number for not to perform the depreciation.
Kindly advice Pls.
Thanks.
Vivek.
Message was edited by:
        vivek mohan

Hi Vivek,
In my experience,
- If you selected "Test Run" then it should be not posted value. So I think there was an accident.
- You cannot reverse depreciation which has been posted.
- If depreciation for asset no : "1234" has been posted , let say in period 11, then when you repeat the depreciation for period 11, system will not post duplicate value. So here are what you have to do :
1. Run AFAB using parameter Reason for Posting Run = "REPEAT RUN". Please tick "TEST RUN"
2. Check wether asset "1234" will be posted again ( See in Column "Amount to be posted").
3. If you're okay with the result then execute AFAB again but now, untick the "TEST RUN".
Hope this helps.

RAPOST2000 error handling depreciation test run

I have a problem with the error handling in ECC 6.0 (RAPOST2000). when I run a test run in foreground, the error list is diplayed nicely and i can doble click to see the problem for each asset. But as we have more than 1000 assets we have to run the test run in background, resulting that the error list is placed in the spool without the possibility to drill down to the problem per asset (only the error no displayed in the list). How to proceed to get a smooth way of handling errors without to use two lists ( first the errors per asset, and then the list explaining the error).

Yes, the "Error Analaysis" indicator was ticked when starting the depreciation test run. So, that does not solve the problem having to match 2 different list/reports to analyze/correct the errors.
Regards

Actual Hours difference between IW38 and IW47

Hello all.
I have a unique situation that I am trying to handle. Am trying to see if someone here knows what is happening.
I have a Work Order. In the "Costs" tab and in the "Quantities" Sub tab
Planned hours of Word=36 hrs
Actual Hours=35 hours.
But when I run IW47 to see all the confirmations to this order, it only shows 3 confirmations totalling 14 Hours.
While in the order the actual hours is 36. I am not sure what happened to the remaining 21 Hours. Can someone please tell me what else could be going on here.

Hello,
I was also facing the same issue for actual work hours difference in iw37 and iw48 .
But following sap note has solved the problem.
146929
Missing or incorrect actual values in activity
Cheers!!!!
Regards,
Piyush

Park and Post for Depreciation Run - AFAB

Hello Experts,
We have around 15,000 assets in our company code. We have requirement that, asset management team will check the depreciation and execute the depreciation for all 15000 depreciation. However at this time, FI postings should not be available.
Later the finance team will re-check the depreciation on test check basis and post it to FI. Trial balance will be updated.
In short, I require park and post for depreciation run in SAP.

Hi Meena,
You can verify planned depreciation in Asset report S_ALR_87011990 and do not tick depreciation posted check box and give report date as the last date of the month you want to verify.
It will give depreciation planned details up to the month in the field dep for the year.
After verifying this you can run AFAB then check the same T code and this time tick depreciation posted check box. Now it will give you depreciation posted.
There is no parking concept in Asset module.
Hope it solves.
Regards,
GSR

Difference in actual figure and figure calculated by report

I am using Report 6i.
I have created tabular report of provident fund through salary annualy as follows
empno, op_bal, apr, may, jun, jul, aug, sep, oct, nov, dec, jan, feb, mar, cl_bal
column total apr_tot,may_tot,jun_tot,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx
I have created summary column for calculating column total for each month.
Their property is set as follows
Function - 'Sum'
Source = 'cp_apr'
Reset at 'Report'
This value is store in apr_tot.
Now there is difference in apr_tot and month wise total calculated in database editor.
If i check apr_tot in database editor through sql, it shows little higher amount.
What should I do?
Regards,
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Their property is set as follows
Function - 'Sum'
Source = 'cp_apr'
Reset at 'Report'
his value is store in apr_tot.You have sum the total from cp_apr, and cp_apr hold value of apr_tot??
Now there is difference in apr_tot and month wise
total calculated in database editor.
If i check apr_tot in database editor through sql, it
shows little higher amount.little higher mean?? what is the actual different?? is it a rounding issue?? or may be the format msak issue?
Regards

Difference in Actual and Test Run - Depreciation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for