Direct Material Desciption not Replicated over to SRM

Hi,
I am using SRM Server 5.5,Classic Scenario.When we replicated materials the material Descriptions are not transferred.Can't see in Commpr01.Any clues please?
Thanks & Regards,
Sudhakar

Hi sudhakar,
i am also facing the same problem,
For some of materials Description are not Replicated over to SRM.
Did u find any solution..
pleas help us.
Regards,
Mani
[email protected]

Similar Messages

  • R/3 material number not replicated in COMM_PRODUCT and COMMPR01 in SRM

    Hi SRM experts,
    We have a problem when SRM user tries to raise order against Product A. He encountered an error "Incomplete items on Catalog, only complete Items transferred". Upon looking at COMM_PRODUCT table and COMMPR01 (product maintenance) in SRM, this Product A is not existing. What could be the reason why this product was not replicated in SRM? Among materials w/c belong to same Product Category are all exist in table except for this specific material. This, however, is existing in MARA and not flagged for deletion. I have checked the SMQ2 in SRM and no queues found.
    Need your expert advice.
    Thanks,
    Madelyn

    Hi
    In SRM, use Transaction – SM30
    Go to Table - COMCHIERARCHY_
    Amend the setting so that the following is checked:
    Transfer 60 Character Description
    This will now ensure that the 60 character material group description is replicated to SRM.
    The OSS note (455949) SAP has given us long back works around CRM customizing path.
    *To access it in SRM use SM30 on COMCHIERARCHY to use long description instead of short one.*_
    Use
    In R/3 system - T023T has short description (20 char) and long description ( 60 char ).
    The description in SRM COMM_CATEGORYT has 80 char length.
    See related pointers ->
    overwriting SAP standard material description
    Material Group description in SRM
    How can i change the description of material when i create a SC?
    Hope this will help. Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • CRM material description not replicated

    Hi All.
    We are facing a issue.
    A new material was created in R/3 and was replicated in CRM but the material discription is not replicated in CRM when we see in commpr01.
    How to solve this issue.
    We are using CRM 4.0 and R/3 4.7

    Hi Rajat,
    Please check the procedures during replication process. Generally entire header information will be replicated when standard material is being replicated. if any routines exist, then please check those.
    Thanks,
    sksingh

  • R/3 Material description not replicating in SRM CC-Hubwoo

    Hi experts,
    I have an issue with the material description,
    I dont have much knowlodge in EBP and im new to SRM.
    Material description in R/3 and CC-Hubwoo are not matching.
    Can any body help me regarding the issue.....
    Thanks in advance,
    Krish.

    Hi
    In SRM, use Transaction – SM30
    Go to Table - COMCHIERARCHY_
    Amend the setting so that the following is checked:
    Transfer 60 Character Description
    This will now ensure that the 60 character material group description is replicated to SRM.
    The OSS note (455949) SAP has given us long back works around CRM customizing path.
    *To access it in SRM use SM30 on COMCHIERARCHY to use long description instead of short one.*_
    Use
    In R/3 system - T023T has short description (20 char) and long description ( 60 char ).
    The description in SRM COMM_CATEGORYT has 80 char length.
    See related pointers ->
    overwriting SAP standard material description
    Material Group description in SRM
    How can i change the description of material when i create a SC?
    Hope this will help. Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • SUS user data not replicated to SRM

    In service SRMSUS in the SUS system, we have user w/ role  SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_VENDOR.
    When this user modifies his own user data such as name/email/time zone, the change in user data is NOT replicated to the SRM system. The SRM user data still contains the original user information.
    I believe user data update is done via a RFC call, and not XI. I've checked for security auth object and there are no authorization issues.
    Are there any additional configs we're missing?
    We're on SRM 4.0 / SAPKIBKS10 / SAPKB64019
    I've already checked all the OSS Notes including, but they don't help, or pertain to my situation:
    Note 893714 - SUS30: Replication of bidding users from SUS to EBP
    Note 919070 - SUS-UM: User settings are not stored correctly

    Hi,
    you need to maintain the system details where the changed data needs to be replicated at the following customizing in SUS
    1) Transaction SPRO --->
    2) Path ---> Supplier Relationship Management ---> Supplier Self Services --->
    Master Data --->Maintain Systems For Synchronization of User Data
    ( check help available with the customizing for more details ).
    3) Maintain New Entry for the external systems ---> this should be your SRM system and then use the following data .
    F. Mod.: Create User BAPI_USER_CREATE  
    F. Mod.: Change User BAPI_USER_CHANGE  
    F. Mod.: Delete User BAPI_USER_DELETE 
    4) save data
    5) once you hav done this , when you make changes , data will be synchrozed with SRM

  • Direct material procurement in PDP scenario for classic mode

    Dear Gurus,
    We have configured classic scenario in our SRM 7.01 with backend system ECC 6.0 Enhpk 5.  We have PDP scenario for direct material as one of the requirement. The requirement generated in MRP in the ECC backend system will be sent to SRM SOCO for sourcing. Once the right source of supply is found, the follow-on purchase order needs to be created in the ECC backend system in direct material mode.
    However, the SAP SRM standard supports only indirect material procurement in PDP scneario for classic mode. How to enable the direct material procurement? Could you suggest any BAdi to be used here?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan
    Ranjan Sutradhar

    Hello,
    You need to activate the Bsdi 'ME_REQ_SOURCING_CUST' for transferring the purchase requisitions from ERP to SAP SRM.
    Some details about the method involved for the same are mentioned below :
    Mehtod : IF_EX_ME_REQ_SOURCE_CUST~ACTIVE
    ->when parameter CV_AUT_SOURCING is set to true, external sourcing (e.g. SRM system) is active in ERP system
    ->when parameter CV_EXT_RFX_IND is set to true, RFx can be created out of PR directly from ERP system using application CPPR
    ->when parameter CV_EXT_SC_IND is set to true, PR in ERP system will be transferred to SRM using application CPPR
    Method b. IF_EX_ME_REQ_SOURCE_CUST~CHECK_EXTERNAL_SOURCE
    Here you need to maintain the logic / condition for which PR has to be transfered to SOCO.
    Example
    IF ( is_req_item-ekgrp = 'SRM' AND is_req_item-matkl = '100' )
    cv_ext_sourcing = cl_mmpur_constants=>yes.
    ENDIF.
    When this BADI is active whenever you save a PR with say the purchasing group as SRM and material group is 100 (as per sample code above), system automatically triggers the PR transfer from ERP to SRM by xml's.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • Backend Source of Supply not supported for Direct Material in SRM

    Hi ,
    When creating S/C or PO in SRM for Direct Material , backend Source of Supply ( i..e Purchasing Info Record or Backend Contracts ) not availble to select as a sourc of supply .
    In our case, we are planning to maintain the sourc of supply (PIR or Contracts) in back end MM system only , then how can pick up the same ?
    Can anyone please suggest on this .
    Regards
    NAP

    NO Prashanta,
    It is still pending for me . i just raised OSS message to SAP ...but SAP saying that
    " I checked and found that in the classic scenario , Direct Materials cannot use backend contracts. The behavior described above is in accordance with the system design. Only local sources of supply (local contracts and interlinkages) can be
    used in the direct material scenario, as well as as in the extended classic scenario . Therefore the above error message which you get "Specify a valid contract" is valid."
    I replied with the doubt that "Thanks for reply but we are not convenience, since what we learnt from
    different SAP Blogs, Below SAP help and SRM Experts discussion forum
    is, for Ext Classic Scenario (since for direct materials it always
    tales by default Ext Classic Scenario, although we implemented Classic)
    Local SRM contract and Supplier List are the possible Source of Supply.
    As per SAP help documentation for Self-Service Procurement (Extended
    Classic) on below link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/e0/f6be5157a24340bf7b1279854a52e1/frameset.htm u201CYou can assign the sources proposed by the
    system to items automatically (for example, if there is a single
    contract for the item being procured) or manually in the case of a
    quota arrangement, contract, or supplier from a supplier listu201D
    As per SAP help documentation for Sourcing Using Supplier Lists on
    below link,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/d8/33ec56f17f4404806072749f7e764f/frameset.htm u201CIn supplier lists, you can also manually allocate
    back-end contracts from specific systems. This enables more effective
    sourcing for back-end contractsu201D
    In the Supplier List there is facility to enter the ECC Contract
    Number. Supplier List donu2019t support local SRM contract. It supports
    only ECC Contract /item.
    As per your reply, do you mean to say that Source List is not a valid
    Source of Supply for Direct Material in Classic Scenario (i.e. Ext
    Classic scenario)? If not, then why the backend ECC Contract displays
    as a Source of Supply, when we check the u201COrder as direct Materialu201D?
    Kindly suggest"
    Lets see.what SAP now replies.
    Simultaniously I'm looking some enhancment
    If you have nay update/soultion then please share with me.

  • "order as direct material" indicator is not coming in Shopping Cart.

    Hi Experts,
    I am trying to perform the employee self service procurement for a direct material. I have performed the below config and attribute maintenance.
    1. Defined a new transaction type and new number range for local PO in SRM Config
    2. In R/3 Back-End, for the same document type, I have ensured that number range is present
    3. For my Root Organization, I have added "DP_PROC_TY" for "Transaction Type: Create PO manually" maintained with my above transaction type defined
    4. I have selected my local P Group and added 001 Product Category with R/3 Back-end system as source system in "Responsibility" tab
    After that I have started created Shopping Cart expecting to find "Order as Direct Material" indicator in Shopping Cart details.
    But I could not be able to see that indicator in Shopping Cart. What I see is Product Category 001 but different P Group is coming.
    Is this the reason, what I am missing. Please help.
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi,
    Please check that the component configuration has not hidden the field, it is under the following configuration:
    General Information About the Application and Component
    Application: /SAPSRM/WDA_L_FPM_GAF
    Web Dynpro Component: /SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_SC_I_BD
    Window Information: IV_L_FPC_CA_DETAILS
    View Information: V_DODC_SC_I_BD
    Configuration ID: /SAPSRM/WDCC_FPM_DODC_SC_I_BD_WI
    Component Element you are looking for is ORDER_DIRECT_MAT_LABEL
    Also check if someone has hidden the field using WD customizing onscreen, right click over the screen and choose 'User Settings', here check if any fields are hidden.
    Regards,
    Jason

  • SRM MM-SUS for Direct Material ( i.e. Ext Classic Scenario)

    Hi Friends,
    We are planning to have the Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0  with  SUS. So it will be SUS-MM scenarion and it supports only for Classic Scenario,
    But when there is a case of Direct Materials [ Manual or through PDP ( Ext Req) ], it is SAP by defaullt setting that , system determine Extended Classic Scenario.
    Now , if SUS-MM supports only to Classic scenario ,then we can collaborate the Orders of Direct Material genereted through Ext Classic Scenario in SUS ?
    Confused over these contrast . Can any one suggest that how to get both one in SUS-MM  ?
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi Alex,
    Thanks for reply.
    It seems here is some confusion. PDP of Dircet Material is standard SRM secarion where we can soure the requieremnets generted in various SAP Module like PS, PM , SD, APO..etc. So We just hav eintenstion to source the requiermnet in Sourcing cockpit to create the PO .
    Okay. For time being , forget the PDP of Direct Material.
    Just take the Direct  Material ( For which we mention inventory or we procure for stock) only.
    By SAP standard / defualt setting  , for Direct  Material , local PO is generted ,althoug we have mentioned Classic Senrion setting for the same . And it is Extended Classic Scenarion. Right!
    At another side , it is SAP standrad that SUS-MM senarion support for only CLASSIC SCENARIO.
    Then , my conern is  how we can send these Local orders for dircet Material to Supplier via SUS ? Wether it is not possible ?

  • Order as Direct material check is not coming for shoppingcart with material

    Hi,
    We are using portal indpendent navigation screen (NWBC) SRM 7.0 extended classic scenario. Order as direct material check box is not coming in item data of shopping cart for shopping against the material. I checked every thing but not able to get the check box for order as direct material.
    Please advise what to do.
    (N. Kiran Kumar)

    Hi,
    Please check that the component configuration has not hidden the field, it is under the following configuration:
    General Information About the Application and Component
    Application: /SAPSRM/WDA_L_FPM_GAF
    Web Dynpro Component: /SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_SC_I_BD
    Window Information: IV_L_FPC_CA_DETAILS
    View Information: V_DODC_SC_I_BD
    Configuration ID: /SAPSRM/WDCC_FPM_DODC_SC_I_BD_WI
    Component Element you are looking for is ORDER_DIRECT_MAT_LABEL
    Also check if someone has hidden the field using WD customizing onscreen, right click over the screen and choose 'User Settings', here check if any fields are hidden.
    Regards,
    Jason

  • Direct Material Not Shown in Search Products/Services

    Hi ,
    We are implementing Classic Scenario on SRM5.0. We replicated materials.The materials are shown in COMMPR01 with out Product Descriptions.When try to search for Materials under BBPSC02> Internal Goods/Services > Find Product, i don't see any materials.Product GUID returns no values.But Search by Description of Product Id returns Materials.But when select the material returns Message"No values for this Selection".
    Any Suggessions please?
    Thanks and Regads,
    Sudhakar.

    Hi Yann,
    Yes. Apparently the issue belong to Data .When i create material Manually in R/3 and Replicate ,i am able to see.But not the converted data.
    So at this point i would seek help..can some one tell me what is criteria for the Direct material to be shown in internal goods/Services area..i mean can i replicate all material types like Finished goods,Semi finished ,Valuation classes, with or without Plant Specific material indicator etc.I have purchasing and accounting views right on all materials.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sudhakar

  • Why account assignment is not deleted when push "Order as Direct Material"?

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a problem with shopping carts (SC) of stock items:
    1.- I add 5 items.
    2.- I push "Order as Direct Material" button for 3 items only.
    3.- I push "Hold" button to set SC with held status.
    4.- I modify the SC and push "Order as Direct Material" button for 2 items missing.
    5.- I order the SC.
    One of the effects that it has the "Order as Direct Material" button is that it deletes the account assignment because the items will use to create a PO stock.
    But for the last 2 items (number 4.-) the account assignment is not deleted.
    This is causing that the PO's have error: "Invalid tax code".
    Somebody can say to me why is not deleting the account assignment for items previously hold?
    My systems are:
    SRM 4.0 (SRM_SERVER 500) level 8
    R/3 4.7 (SAP_APPL 470) level 24

    Juan Alonso Valenzuela Rodríguez wrote:
    > Hi Gurus,
    >
    > I have a problem with shopping carts (SC) of stock items:
    >
    > 1.- I add 5 items. -- O.K - Assumed that you have 5 items added
    > 2.- I push "Order as Direct Material" button for 3 items only.O.K.You selected as ORDER as direct only for 3 rd item
    > 3.- I push "Hold" button to set SC with held status.- O.K. now HOLD the shopping cart
    > 4.- I modify the SC and push "Order as Direct Material" button for 2 items missing.- Now you went to 2 nd items and ORDER as direct
    > 5.- I order the SC.but this 2 nd item account data was not removed though you selected as ORDER as direct-
    check item data what is stored here DP ? if account assignment not cleared it could be a bug. but you need to convince them to get a correction note.
    >
    > One of the effects that it has the "Order as Direct Material" button is that it deletes the account assignment because the items will use to create a PO stock.
    >
    > But for the last 2 items (number 4.-) the account assignment is not deleted.
    >
    > This is causing that the PO's have error: "Invalid tax code".
    >
    > Somebody can say to me why is not deleting the account assignment for items previously hold?
    >
    > My systems are:
    > SRM 4.0 (SRM_SERVER 500) level 8
    > R/3 4.7 (SAP_APPL 470) level 24

  • PR is not creating in Backend ECC for Direct material Shopping carts

    Hello Experts,
    i have one issue, due to some reasons we deactivated 'Order as Direct Material' button on our SRM shoppingcart screen. But again due to the requirement we activated the 'Order as Direct Material' button. Now the issue is when we are creating a shopping cart by using order as direct material button no Purchase Requisition is creating in the backend ECC. we are in SRM 5.0. we already implemented BADI: BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW. we are able to create PR for the shopping carts which we order normally i.e for non-direct materials (with out using that order as direct material button).
    please guide me on this!!!
    thanks in advance!!!!
    regards
    CD Reddy

    Hello,
    You can use note 1173815 to debug if follow-on document determination is occurring in backend.
    Also, you will be able to check if any error happened during this process.
    Kind regards
    Ricardo

  • Getting error while creating PO for direct material in SRM 7.0

    While creating PO in SRM for direct material,i am getting the error as :Backend error-No Funds center entered/derivedin item 00001(3000/2211100).Please suggest me the solution

    Hi,
    We are using PPS functionality with SRM 7.0
    Regards,
    Gopal
    Edited by: gopalthadi on Feb 9, 2011 5:01 PM

  • SRM 7.0 PO not replicated to Backend ECC 6.0 Ehp 4

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    SRM 7.0  SP 8 - ECC 6.04 SAPKH60406 ECS
    RFx Response to PO -
    SRM Local PO is created and is in held status.  Purchaser gives the source of supply and Acc Assignment and order it.
    PO now is in Ordered status.
    Issue: this PO is not replicated to Backend ECC 6.04.
    Did the Debugging as follows:
    1.  BP at B46B_DPO_TRANSFER.
    2.  Got the PO GUID from the BBP_PD transaction.
    3.  FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, execute it and it  stopped in the breakpoint.
    4.  On 'FUNCTION 'BBP_PO_INBOUND' DESTINATION lv_destination',  hit F6.
    5. Checked  lt_bapi_return details.
    Here there should be information regarding some error during the PO copy to backend.
    With this error message you can check why the PO was not created in backend.
    ERRORS from Backend are as follows:
    1.   No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:   E  BAPI 001
    2.   Document contains no items       E    ID 06   Number 010
    3.   Please enter items first.              W   ID 05                 005
    No XML messages in SXMB_moni both in SRM side and ECC side.
    What am i doing wrong here?  Any help is highly appreciated.
    with regards,
    Freemind

    RZ20 errors:
    Local Errors:   Business to Business Procurement(600)
    Error reading export data for EXEC transfer of purchase order
    Error in local purchase order; no update of references in EXEC system
    Backend Errors:
    PO 3000000051: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
    Purchase order 3000000051: Document contains no items
    Purchase order 3000000051: Transfer Failed; Resubmit
    Since we are in SRM 7.0 ECC 6.04 Ehp 4,  with PI 7.11 + ROS and no SUS.
    doent the system uses ESOA Service for PO replication.
    We did CCTR / CPPR scenarios too. Both are sucessful.
    Do we need to impl BADI PUR_SE_PO_INTERFACE_OUT_SELECT
    But thats for Service hierarchy and Service POs -  We dont have Service hierarchy or SUS in our SLD.
    IF PO replication also uses PI, what configuration do i need to do?

Maybe you are looking for