Direct posting of G/L account is not allowed at PO level.

Hi,
Procurement of Consumables thru Maintenance Order (for Breakdown Maintenance):
1. Generation of Purchase Requisition thru maintenance order .
2. Purchase Order from purchase requisition
3. MIGO
4. MIRO
The required consumables are assigned in maintenance order. when converting PR to PO this consumables will automatically flow. According to the valuation class and gl account in material master GL account will also flow automatically.
When converting PR to PO the system throws an error saying that Direct posting is not possible for the G/L account.
I made this GL account as post automatically to ensure that there should be no manual postings for such automatic account determinated GL accounts thru valuation class.
This error can be resolved by removing the tick mark post automatically but is this correct. If it is so then what is the implication of automatic a/c assignment thru valuation class.
Please guide
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Sam

Dear Sir,
We have added the Consumables (Diesel) in Components tab with Item category N. So, it has triggered a PR from MO. As you know account assignment category is ORDER (F) only.
Also, they have resolved the problem. Problem was with the G/L account Master data.
Thanx a lot
Regards
Sam

Similar Messages

Activating Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts

Hi,
Can anyone plz tell me with some examples ,what is the relevance of this ,'Activating Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts'.
Link for this is as below :
spro/Materials Management/ Logistics Invoice Verification / Incoming Invoices / Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts
Whether normally everyone will use this or not ?
regards,

Sandeep
In Logistics Invoice Verification, you can also post invoices that do not refer to a purchase order or a delivery. A typical example of this is a bill for expenses.
As in the case of an invoice with a reference, you first need to enter the header data and the vendor information.
In contrast to invoices with a reference, the system does not display any proposed values for the invoice items, since it cannot determine any purchase order items and posted goods receipts for this invoice. As a result, the system does not know which accounts are affected by the offsetting entry for the vendor line item. Therefore, you must specify which accounts the amounts are to be posted to. The SAP System provides the following options:
Posting to a G/L account
You post to G/L accounts if you, for example, want to settle small amounts for freight costs and similar items and do not want to add these to the material accounts or cost accounts for the invoice items.
Posting to a material account
You post to material accounts, if you, for example, want to debit or credit a material without using a purchase order reference
You can also combine these options by generating the relevant posting lines one after the other, or by generating lines with reference to a purchase order.
When you enter an invoice without a reference, you may find that a vendor has not been created in the system. You can post this invoice to a one-time account.
You can have activated this functionality if you want to post directly to GL account and material.
Hope this clarifies
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar

Special G/L posting to one-time account is not defined Message no. F5265

hi,
Special G/L posting to one-time account is not defined
Message no. F5265
the above message is displaying when tried to post for one time customer.
where to check this in configuration level. what are the tcodes , please let me know.
actually i am abaper, dont know much abt fi configuration..
regards,
Hari priya

Dear H Priya,
u r posting to one time Customer
in that there is no need of special G/L indicater. (it means special G/L - down payment)
if the customer is one time how can u take the down payment from the customer.
if any quaries plz...........
Regards
radha

Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts

under configuration if we tick on "Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
then what would be the impact?
Thanks & Regards
Nitin Gupta

Hi
When u tick "direct posting the material" material tab will be available in MIRO screen ( along with PO reference )
here u can post invoices w/o reference to PO directly material account
Check info Given by SAP
If you have activated posting to material accounts in Customizing, you can enter invoice lines without a PO reference on the Material tab page. These lines are then posted to the given material when you post the invoice
When posting directly to a material, no posting is made to a GR/IR clearing account. The system posts manually entered material lines directly to the stock account or a price difference account, depending on price control and stock coverage
Vishal...

I tried to install an app from Channel 4 in the UK and got a message that my account would not allow that. Now I appear to be permanently connected to the UK ITunes Store. How to get back to the USA store?

I tried to install an app from Channel 4 in the UK and got a message that my account would not allow that. Now I appear to be permanently connected to the UK ITunes Store. How to get back to the USA store?

Never mind, after about 20 minutes it switched back by itself.

I used another computer to get music and now their account is not allowing me to add music onto my ipod from my computer... please help!

I used another computer a while back to get music and now their account is not allowing me to add music onto my ipod, from my computer, on my account.

What computer did yu last sync with? Yu can only sync with one computer/iTunes library.
You can however manage musiic amon different computers.
Using iPhone, iPad, or iPod with multiple computers
If you need more help please provide more detail on what youd have done and tried on both computers.

I just reset my computer and my itunes account is not allowing me to do anything unless i answer my security questions. the problem is i never supplied them with the answers they are asking.i don't know what to do!!!

i just reset my computer and my itunes account is not allowing me to do anything unless i answer my security questions. the problem is i never supplied them with the answers they are asking.i don't know what to do!!!

https://expresslane.apple.com/Issues.action

Credit Memo all my material items to be directly posted to Balance Sheet account

Hi Experts
My client has a scenario where for certain items they create a credit memo request document and finally a credit memo document from the VKOA system is picking the revenue bearing GL and posting all the line items to that G/L account
Manually my customer is again checking and extracting the p/l and posting to balance sheet account
is there a way where we can directly post these entries to Balance Sheet account
Best Regards
Waseem

Hi Sanil
Thanks for the quick reply, can we assign a balance sheet account directly in VKOA in the G/L account field or do we need to add this in directly in Provision acc field
As suggested by you we already have the access sequence with respect to Order Reason, I am just doubtful wether we can directly give Balance Sheet account in G/L account field
Best Regards
Waseem

MIRO - Activate Direct posting to G/L Account - user exit/badi

Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to restrict the acces to the direct posting to GL account tab in MIRO.
Activation of the flag in config leads to the appearance of this tabpage in all MIRO transactions.
My cliente needs this tab page to appear in only a certain set of circumstances.
Is there a user-exit or BADI to manipulate the "Direct-posting Tab" in this way?
Anyone has done something like that?
Thanks for any reply.
Aart

By creating transaction variant & restricting g/l account tab through authorization for required users.

Direct Posting to G/L Account in MIRO

Hi,
I have created a Purchase Order with following conditions
Qty     50
Price     100
Total (Accessible Value for Excise)     5000
Excise     500
Ecess     10
HSCess     5
Total Excise     515
Total+Excise For VAT     5515
VAT     744.525
Total Payable to Vendor     6259.525
Here please note that the Excise is being calculated on Rs. 5000.
When we receive the Excise Invoice, the Vendor is charging the Excise on different Accessable Value i.e. on Rs. 16000
While posting the Excise Invoice, I have changed the Accessible Value and the following FI document is generated:
24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     6
24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     600
24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     12
13113920     CENVAT clearing     618.00-
While posting the Vendor Invoice, the system is showing a difference in Ecess, SHEcess & VAT Amount as shown below:
K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,359.53-
S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53
To match the difference we posted the difference in VAT & Cenvat the G/L Account tab and Rs, 135.01- in Unpl. Del. Csts
The system is generating the following FI Entries
K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,376.43-                    **
S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00     4500000841     EE
M     24340000     SinarMatArtCard>220gsm63.5x91"     131.03-     4500000841     EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     1.95                    V0
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     0.97                    V0
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     145.01
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600                    EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10                    EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5                    EE
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53                    EE
My question/ doubt is:
1.     Is this the correct way to pass the difference in VAT & Excise directly to G/L Accounts?
2.     Why in MIRO, the BED is correct & ECess & HSCess are wrong? Is this related with Tax Procedure & Pricing Procedure?
3.     What is the standard way for handling the above situation. Please note that this situation is coming for only one Excise Vendor.
Please advise.
Regards,

1.In J1IEX, we could not found MRP Indicator check box in miscellaneous tab.
Where do we need to change in the Configuration.
Refer this thread [MRP indicator|Re: MRP indicator]
2.While posting the MIRO, the following entries were generated, which is wrong?
Here tax amount being calculate is wrong;
it should be 240 as per the manual. On simulation, the ECess amount is not shown.
As suggested in earlier reply,Please check tax procedure with help of FI consultant.
3.When capturing the Invoice in MIGO, MRP Indicator check box was there in Miscellaneous tab.
But the HSCess was not in editable mode, we could just enter the Basic Duty & ECess Amount.
There are lot of threads regarding hecess not editable,Pl search.
If possible can you please provide the details of the process from PO to MIRO
along with FI Entries so that I can test the same again (to get a clear cut concept of the process).
1.Purchase order with price + excise values with dealer tax code.
2. GR with excise (capture & post) or
A.Capture excise with ref. to p.o using J1IEX,tick mark mrp indicator,change excise base value,enter other excise amounts.
B. GR with ref. to ex. inv. no(In step A) - Refer exise invoice only
C. Post excise with ref. to ex. inv. no.
3. Vendor invoice ref. to delivery note no.
FI entries for GR
Stock account Dr to GR/IR a/c
Excise entries
Cenvat payable ED,CS,HECS Dr to Cenvat clearing a/c
Vendor invoice entries
GR/IR A/c,Cenvat clearing a/c,VAT/CST a/c Dr to Vendor a/c
Hope it solves problem.
Note :
I will suggest you to search forum before posting basic questions.
Don;t post multiple questions.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 4, 2010 3:05 PM

While posting MIRO price difference account is not determimg for price vari

Hi Sapients,
Please solve the production issue which we have faced yesterday while doing month end closing
In one P.O 4 items are there,User has posted entries in below sequence
Material type is TRADING GOODS
1)first MIRO with QTY 10 @100$ each,Later
2)MIGO has done with QTY 10 @100$
Raw Material account -
1000$
to GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
1000$
2)User has reverse the MIRO transaction with QTY 10 @ 100$ each.(with refer to step1)
3)Finally he post MIRO with QTY 10 @ 90$ each, so here ther is no qty variance has come only price variance has come, so when posting the difference is not going to price difference and the entry is paasing like this
GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
900$
TO Vendor 900$
If u see in step 2 GR/IR having 1000$, but in step 3 while MIRO posting GR/IR as 900$ so for the remaing balance 100$ not going to price variance .I Belive the entry in step will be like this
GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
1000$
TO Vendor 900$
TO Price difference 100$.
Kindly give solution why it is not going to price difference it was happening only for item 2 & 3 only for 40 iem it is posting correctly to price difference account.Please advice me why system behavig differently for each item.
Thanks & Regards
YSR

Hi Padmasri,
Thanks for your explanation. Ok. if the price is maintained in S, does that mean the price difference would get posted only to PRD. In other words, if price indicator is V, is that the only time when the price difference gets posted to stock account. In case if there is no sufficient stock or if there is negative stock at that time, that's when the amount would get posted to stock loss or gain account. Please suggest if I've understood the concept right.
Hi,
The PRD will trigger when the standard price maintained in the material mater record is different from the price in MIGO . The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock )
will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you
You had suggested: The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock ) will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue.
You are right: I forgot to mention that the price indicator is V. The other point is we purchase the materials from an internal vendor, as and when the materials are dispatched from the main storehouse in Sri Lanka, there is an advice that is created in the system and that is interfaced and parked in the system. However, normally until the GR is done IV will not happen. But there could be a chance, as the advice gets created within 24 hours. However the material to reach the godown in our warehouse will take more than 24 hours as the goods have to be shipped from SL, so IV is possible before GR.
Regards,
Soujanya

Direct Posting to g/l accounts

Dear all,
Client is buying a material, with material master having Qty and value update locally through petty cash. They donu2019t want do PO and GR. They want to settle it directly in MIRO. But they need qty and value updation. Is it possible ? how to do it in SAP ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Raman

Hi,
Its better to use materials of material type "UNBW" for this Purchase. it has only quantity update and no value update means at the time of GR, value of material will get expensed out and quantity will get stored in inventory (Check in MMBE) and then consume it as per requirement in MIGO using GI Movement types.
1. ME21N - Create PO with Acct Assmt Cat for the materials for e.g. K -Cost Center
2. MIGO - GR w.r.t. PO
Expense A/c - Dr
GR/IR Clearing - Cr
3. MIRO - LIV w.r.t. PO
Vendor A/c - Cr
GR/IR Clearing - Dr
Else go for direct GR w/o reference MIGO using movement type 501 and then go to FB60 - Enter Vendor Invoice and then do payment.

Since upgrading firefox my tiscali (through Talk talk) email account will not allow me access to my emails saying 'You have undefined new mails in your inbox' and will not open the page. it works on Internet Explorer.

It thinks there is no information there! If I revert to 3.6 how long will security be maintained. At the moment I am opening Mozilla for web browsing but IE for my email account. I am not very PC literate so need simple answers.

Apparently TalkTalk mail will work with Firefox 4 and Firefox 5 ''if'' you set the browser to ''lie'' to TalkTalk mail by saying that you are still using version 3.6.
You can find the instructions for that in a post on the TalkTalk forums: [http://www.talktalk.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=185113#post2452787 Firefox 4 & TalkTalk webmail - Forums].
Note: when you open about:config the first time, it will display a warning message that you should be careful with the changes you make. That's definitely good to bear in mind.
Does it work?

Volume licence account will not allow purchasing?

I am attempting to buy several apps in bulk for a school and im using the volume.itunes.apple.com website to make the purchases. I was working along this morning and got about 1/4th of the way down my list when all of a sudden it started giving me this error
The iTunes Store is unable to process purchases at this time.
Credit card processing is temporarily unavailable. You may continue to browse the store. Please try to make your purchase later
any info?

Im sorry you have this issue...
Though, this is the support community, we are not Apple Employees here, and just iTunes users like yourself.
As to your issue (which I have googled) You would have to contact Apple's Volume purchase program team. If this is a VPP business account, then here is the email form you can use to contact Apple directly. https://www.apple.com/support/itunes/vpp/
If the VPP is for education: https://www.apple.com/support/itunes/vpp-edu/
Good luck.. Hope this helps..

MASHUP for account news not allowed in IFRAME

Trying to add web mashup and think I have 2 issues in adding a web mashup to the account view. I am starting with this URL
http://news.google.com/news/search?hl=en&gl=us&q=SAP and use the web ui mashup tool to change to this, so the account name defaults in.
http://news.google.com/news/search?hl=en&gl=us&q=<VALUE[BOL:BP_ACCOUNT:FIRSTNAME]>
1st problem is I get the error this view can't be opened in an Iframe, is there a way to work this?
2nd It does not appear the the account name is getting swapped with <VALUE[BOL:BP_ACCOUNT:FIRSTNAME]>
Thanks,
Edited by: Glenn Michaels on Dec 8, 2011 12:50 PM

To BP Account I had to add a new BOL tag @NAME1 as what I was using was for a person account not an org.
I couldn't resolve the google news not wanting to be in an frame, but using a bloomberg site that does not have that issue.

Direct posting of G/L account is not allowed at PO level.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for