Disk size problem

Hi all;
I have wierd problem, and i dont know why its behave like that.
Df -h gives me:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/cciss/c0d0p2 15G 8.5G 5.3G 62% /
/dev/cciss/c0d0p1 99M 12M 82M 13% /boot
none 4.0G 0 4.0G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/cciss/c0d0p5 385G 219G 147G 60% /oracle
/dev/cciss/c0d1p1 270G 247G 9.2G 97% /data
as u see i have /data partiation and /data partiaton has those file (ls -al ):
total 40
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Jan 22 09:24 .
drwxr-xr-x 29 root root 4096 Jan 20 17:21 ..
drwxrwxrwx 5 root root 4096 Jan 20 17:35 DEMO12
drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Jan 24 2008 lost+found
drwxr-xr-x 56 oracle dba 4096 Aug 25 16:58 ORA10g
drwxr-xr-x 7 applvis dba 4096 Jan 7 1 6:45 patch
The problem is:
DEMO12 folder size is 179 Gb
ORA10G folder size is 2 Gb
patch folder size is 300 Mb
Total size is: 182 GB but df -h gives me :
/dev/cciss/c0d1p1 270G 247G 9.2G 97% /data
atleast i have to have 80 GB free space but i have 9.2 why?? Anyone has idea?
Thanks
Helios

Hi frits again;
I tried comment which you sent me below. And its return those:
**[root@server ~]# find /proc -lname deleted -printf "%l\n" 2>/dev/null**
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/tmp/ibZQNCop (deleted)
/tmp/ibwKOJ0J (deleted)
/tmp/ibvSzkUf (deleted)
/dev/pts/1 (deleted)
/dev/pts/1 (deleted)
/tmp/gconfd-root/lock/0t1232465165ut591716u0p6253r1280233395k3220356316 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/tmp/sh-thd-1232635375 (deleted)
/tmp/sh-thd-1232638745 (deleted)
/var/tmp/invdebug2301.log (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/tmp/sh-thd-1232709439 (deleted)
/tmp/sh-thd-1232721719 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/mod_oc4j.12652.tbl_lock (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/inst/apps/DEMO_linuxblade/pids/10.1.3/Apache/logs/httpd.lock.12652 (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
/data/DEMO12/db/tech_st/10.2.0/dbs/lkinstDEMO (deleted)
Those result has meaning for you? Is this the cause of why we see "/data partation" size is 270 GB but we see 240 GB used, but the folders total size of "/data partation" are 180 GB
Thanks for help
Regards

Similar Messages

R11 disk size problem

Hi;
I have 11.5.10.2 instance on redhat... The question is my disk size become %94... is there any file in EBS system which can be hold soo many space?? Anyone can advice me whihc file i can delete from disk(log file etc..)
or
i can ask my question like that.... for can have open more space for my system which files can be delete for space
Thanks A lot

Hi hussein;
Sorry for latley update,
If you have some other mount point(s) which can be utilized, then consider moving the datafiles (some or all) and/or the archivelog files to this disk.Sorry if i say something wrong hussein. Can you be guide for my curious about below steps.
For instance my dbf file path is :
/u01/VIS/database/visdata and i create new path as : /u02/VIS/database/visdata and move some dbf from /u01 to /u02 manualy as mv command... Is this cause of problem? Becouse i moved them by mv command and when i run something they try to look their old path?
For the other application/database files, please refer to the following documents/links.
Note: 274666.1 - Cleaning An 11i Apps Instance Of Redundant FilesThanks for that nice notes
Delete Events Logs
Re: Delete Events Logs
Thanks for those nice posts and answers too :)
By the way Thanks god we have you here, and oracle is soo lucky becouse they have person like you in this forum which is love to give answers, which is gives always correct notes...
Thanks again

Weirdest disk size problem...

MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011)
I had 256 GB ADATA SSD, SP900, which was working just fine, until a couple of days ago when I suddenly started to get “Startup disk full” message. I copied 20-30 GB onto external drive, twice that day, deleted those files, space freed up, but in a couple of hours I’d start to get the same message(s) again.
I made all files visible, selected ALL files in the root of the disk, then cmd+alt+I…. Got around 165 GB. Yet, when I selected Get Info on the Macintosh HD icon, it said 3 MB free, 256 used…
Pulled the SSD out, put regular old school WD 500GB disk inside, did a clean install and then migrated all of the accounts, applications and other data via Migration Assistant… Volia…. SAME!!! Except, this time, half of the 500 GB disk was full - 256, while the actual data still took up about 165 GB.
Pls take a look at the screenshots:
The first odd thing - I can’t see the (brand/manufacturer) name of the disk - I see Macintosh HD as the “root” name and then, below, Macintosh HD as the volume/partition name.
I have NO option for formatting or resizing/adding/deleting volumes. Had this same issue while ADATA SSD was inside… but choose to ignore it, as I wasn’t experiencing any other problems.
Notice at the bottom, it says 19 MB is free, 499 GB is used, while the picture above clearly states different. This is even worse than information I get with get Info on the Macintosh HD.
Ok, lets see the content and the total size of the files and folders in the root of the disk:
What am I missing here? Deleted sleepimage hibernation file… Checked all the cache and temporary folders… I knew from the start the that was not the problem, as folder/file size can be seen from the root of the disk with show all files option….. Did a PRAM reset to no success.

MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011)
I had 256 GB ADATA SSD, SP900, which was working just fine, until a couple of days ago when I suddenly started to get “Startup disk full” message. I copied 20-30 GB onto external drive, twice that day, deleted those files, space freed up, but in a couple of hours I’d start to get the same message(s) again.
I made all files visible, selected ALL files in the root of the disk, then cmd+alt+I…. Got around 165 GB. Yet, when I selected Get Info on the Macintosh HD icon, it said 3 MB free, 256 used…
Pulled the SSD out, put regular old school WD 500GB disk inside, did a clean install and then migrated all of the accounts, applications and other data via Migration Assistant… Volia…. SAME!!! Except, this time, half of the 500 GB disk was full - 256, while the actual data still took up about 165 GB.
Pls take a look at the screenshots:
The first odd thing - I can’t see the (brand/manufacturer) name of the disk - I see Macintosh HD as the “root” name and then, below, Macintosh HD as the volume/partition name.
I have NO option for formatting or resizing/adding/deleting volumes. Had this same issue while ADATA SSD was inside… but choose to ignore it, as I wasn’t experiencing any other problems.
Notice at the bottom, it says 19 MB is free, 499 GB is used, while the picture above clearly states different. This is even worse than information I get with get Info on the Macintosh HD.
Ok, lets see the content and the total size of the files and folders in the root of the disk:
What am I missing here? Deleted sleepimage hibernation file… Checked all the cache and temporary folders… I knew from the start the that was not the problem, as folder/file size can be seen from the root of the disk with show all files option….. Did a PRAM reset to no success.

MS 6147 max memory and disk sizes

For the MS 6147 can anybody confirm the max Hard disk size and max memory.
It will not recognise the 40Gb HD I am trying to fit, and only recognises half of the 256Mb memeory simm I have fitted.
The BIOS version is 1.9 but I think that is a 'special' by Packard Bell. The MSI BIOS download site makes no mention of disk problems rectified right up to V1.8 which is the latest, with the exception of one for the ZX chipset only which addresses EDMA 66 problem.
Anybody got a definitive answer on this?

Supports a maximum memory size of 256MB (8M x 8) or
512MB (16M x 4) registered DIMM only
how many chips on dimm is what counts with older boards
go to drive makers web site get jumper settings to limit it to 32gb and try

DB disk space problem with upgradation from oim 9.1 to oim 11.1.1.5

Hi All,
Aim: we have to upgrade oim9.1 to oim 11g, with new data cente ( we are doing this in DEV env)
constraint: DB diskSpace is 30 GB
As part of upgradation, we have to import the existing oim 9.1 Db to new DB, Here we faced the size problem, our Dev DB data size is 100GB (which is going to import into new DB), but new DB disk space is 30GB only.
Which tables, do we need to truncate, so that It should not effect upgradtion( we should not miss, oim objects other than User/log inforamtion)?
Do OIm11g(11.1.1.5.0) has any constraints over DB size with 30 GB?
Please suggest me.
Thanks.

The UPA tables are audit related. I doubt you could truncate any of the others and not affect something else.
-Kevin

Disk size in ise

Hi
I have a strange problem after instaling licenses in ISE the following information is in a "show tech"
This info is for 1.3 clean install + license.
% WARNING: ISE DISK SIZE NOT LARGE ENOUGH FOR PRODUCTION USE
% RECOMMENDED DISK SIZE: 200 GB, CURRENT DISK SIZE: 0 GB
It is the same in the Eval version but in this server there is a 2500 license
The same is observed in both ISE 1.2.1 and 1.3 (running a POC on ISE)
When trying to upgrade ISE 1.2.1 > 1.3 the following output
Getting bundle to local machine...
md5: ad7d87d383661bce671804a9e125e42b
sha256: 2a7ebe5196e3d956ac42ec2e5acdf3815a3e0f80db954b58e2c68843bb3c42fd
% Please confirm above crypto hash matches what is posted on Cisco download site.
% Continue? Y/N [Y] ? Y
Unbundling Application Package...
Initiating Application Upgrade...
% Warning: Do not use Ctrl-C or close this terminal window until upgrade completes.
-Checking VM for minimum hardware requirements
% Error: At least 100GB sized hard disk required for upgrade.
the disk is
Hard Disk Count(*): 1
Disk 0: Device Name: /dev/sda
Disk 0: Capacity: 644.20 GB
Disk 0: Geometry: 255 heads 63 sectors/track 78325 cylinders
Thanks
Erik Loeth

Attached is the output from VMware, this is made with the OVA
ISE-1.3.0.876-virtual-SNS3495-2.ova
The disk output from show inventory
NAME: "ISE-VM-K9 chassis", DESCR: "ISE-VM-K9 chassis"
PID: ISE-VM-K9 , VID: V01 , SN: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Total RAM Memory: 16467264 kB
CPU Core Count: 4
CPU 0: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870 @ 2.40GHz
CPU 1: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870 @ 2.40GHz
CPU 2: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870 @ 2.40GHz
CPU 3: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870 @ 2.40GHz
Hard Disk Count(*): 1
Disk 0: Device Name: /dev/sda
Disk 0: Capacity: 644.20 GB
Disk 0: Geometry: 255 heads 63 sectors/track 78325 cylinders
NIC Count: 1
NIC 0: Device Name: eth0
NIC 0: HW Address: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
NIC 0: Driver Descr: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver
(*) Hard Disk Count may be Logical.
Reards
Erik Loeth

DV9000 Maximum Hard Disk Size Supported?

I'm searching for a used HP Pavilion DV9000. I need to know the maximum hard disk size the DV9000 series laptops support. To be clear, could I put a 750G or 1TB disk in each bay?
HP's web site isn't helpful. It gives only the "official" numbers at time of release which state it supports up to 240G, 120 in each bay. Those kinds of numbers are almost never an accurate statement of the limitation as I have seen similar "official" numbers for other HP laptops (supposedly limited to 120G or 250G or whatever) that have no problem supporting 640G in the real world.
The size of hard disk a computer supports is usually a function of the main board's chipset and I don't know how to determine the exact chipset or find the chipset's hard disk support capability. Again, HP's web site isn't helpful here either. They may list it has an nVidia chipset; but, they don't mention which nVidia chipset.
To be clear, I don't own a DV9000 yet and I need to know how to find this information maybe with the exact model number. The model series may be DV9000; but, there are dozens of more exacting model numbers on the bottoms of the DV9000 series computers (example: DV9025ea). I don't want to purchase a DV9000 and then find that its limitation really is 120G per bay.

Hard drive size is a limitation of the Bios, not the chipset, this was overcome with the implementation of Large Block Addressing 48bit in modern bios's in 2003
Hp does not state which bios's on older laptops support this or not.
Looking at the production dates of the 9000 series, I would be willing to bet it supports any size hard drive (48bit LBA), since 48bit LBA was introduced in 2003
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_block_addressing
That being said, there could be brand compatibility issues, so be sure to buy the hard drives from a source that has a friendly return policy.
Maybe some one can post that has actually installed a large hard drive in a 9000 series.

Time Machine backup disk size - total capacity of disk or just files used?

Hi folks,
After upgrading to Leopard, I'm trying to set up my Time Machine. My main HD is 175 Gig and all the OS and other files take up 37 Gig of that. The drive I want to use for Time Machine (a spare internal hard drive) is a 75 Gig drive with 74 Gig of space available. Time machine says this drive is too small to use.
According to the Time Machine documentation, Time Machine takes the _total size of the files_ to be backed up and multiplies that by 1.2. So in my case, since the total files on my 175 Gig drive take up 37 Gig, then I would need only 42 Gig for my Time Machine back up. So, in theory, my 75 Gig spare drive should work just fine.
The problem is that Time Machine is taking the total size of the entire HD and using that to calculate the size of the back up drive, which would be 210 Gig. Does anyone know why this problem is occurring? It seems like Time Machine is not calculating the needed back up disk size properly and is incorrectly including the unused disk space on my main HD.

Not sure exactly, but your drive really is too small. Yes, 37 gb plus workspace would do for your initial Full Backup, but subsequent incrementals could fill it up pretty fast. That would depend, of course, on how you use your Mac -- how often you add or update files of what sizes.
If you change your habits and, say, download a multi-gb video, then work on editing it for a few hours, you could eat up the remaining space very, very quickly.
Just to be sure, how are you determining space used? Via right-click (or control-click) and Get Info on your HD icon?
Also, do you have any other HDs connected? If so, exclude it/them, as TM will include them by default.
Three possible workarounds:
First, get a bigger drive. HDs have gotten ridiculously cheap -- 500 gb (or even some 1 tb) for not much over $100.
Second, use CarbonCopyCloner, SuperDuper, or a similar product instead of TM. CCC is donationware, SuperDuper about $30, I think. Either can make a full bootable "clone", and CCC has an option to either archive previous versions of changed files or delete them. CCC can be set to run automatically hourly, daily, etc. (I suspect SD can, too, but I don't know it's details). An advantage is, of course, if your HD fails you can boot and run from the "clone" until you get it replaced, then reverse the process and clone the external to the internal.
Note that these will take considerably longer, as unlike TM, they don't use the OSX internals to figure out what's been added or changed, but must look at every file and folder. In my case, even smaller than yours, TM's hourly backup rarely runs over 30 seconds; CCC's at least 15 minutes (so I have it run automatically at 3 am). And, if you don't keep previous versions, of course, you lose the ability to recover something that you deleted or changed in error, or got corrupted before the last backup.
Third (and NOT recommended), continue with TM but limit it to your home folder. This means if you lose your HD, you can't restore your whole system from the last TM backup. You'd have to reload from your Leopard disk, the apply all OS updates, and reload any 3rd party settings, then restore from TM. As a friend of mine used to say, "un-good"!

Ultra Sparc 10, WD 80GB Hard Disk format problem

How does one get over the - Contact manufacturer for formating error ?
I have an US10, and am trying to install a 2nd Western Digital 80GB hard disk.
The format command sees this disk as a 2nd disk but only of 11GB capacity.
It does not let me format this disk further.
Any help appreciated.
Arvind.

HI ARAVIND,
First of all I have not so far seen any limitation to disk size on ultra 10. Recently, i.e., 3 days back, I
installed an 80GB Seagate Baracuda HDD on Ultra 10, of course with some teeting problems. At first
I could get only 11.3 GB by default, or 64.5 GB by forcing the disk geometry. I really tried hard to make
this work beyond 64.5GB. As this was for a customer of ours, we had to make it work. I was frantically
searching the internet, and landed in some forum, where somebody replied to exactly similar query to
install Solaris 8 for HDD of capacitiies higher than 20GB. So Bang, I changed the OS to Solaris 8. But
Alas! I got only 74.5 GB capacity. Again went back to Seagate site and found that the figure of 156,301,488
MAX SECTORSwhen multiplied with 1024*1024*1024 you arrive at 74.5 GB, whereas if multiply this
number by 1000*1000*1000 you arrive at 80 Billion Bytes. However I am able to use this disk without any
problem now. So first install Solaris 8 and continue your R&&D. I wasted 4 days in getting this info.

Upd vhdx file size problem

Problem:
User profile disk is full! 'Disk management' reports 7MB free.
Config:
we use user profile disks (vhdx file) on Windows 2012
we limit user profile disk size to 1GB (in the Collection settings)
when i SUM the directory sizes in my user profile disk (using treesize proffesional software, or manually), I see, my profile folders occupy only ~450MB
I expect to have ~550MB free, but system says, I have 7MB free only
windows explorer says, my vhdx file has 660MB ?!!?
my vhdx files are thin provisioned
I tried to compact vhdx file
as described here. I get 'DiskPart successfully compacted the virtual disk file.',
but the problem is still not fixed
Any idea, what can be wrong?

This is what I get:
C:\Users\Administrator.GDM>dir e: /a
Volume in drive E is User Disk
Volume Serial Number is B2F8-92B9
Directory of E:\
08/08/2014 01:26 PM <DIR> $RECYCLE.BIN
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> AppData
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Contacts
08/07/2014 12:05 PM <DIR> Desktop
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Documents
08/12/2014 09:58 AM <DIR> Downloads
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Favorites
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Links
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Music
08/13/2014 04:35 PM 524,288 NTUSER.DAT
05/16/2014 12:04 PM 217,088 ntuser.dat.LOG1
05/16/2014 12:04 PM 0 ntuser.dat.LOG2
05/16/2014 12:04 PM 65,536 NTUSER.DAT{4a5664db-d688-11e1-b53c-842b2b4244af}.TM.blf
05/16/2014 12:04 PM 524,288 NTUSER.DAT{4a5664db-d688-11e1-b53c-842b2b4244af}.TMContainer00000000000000000001.regtrans-ms
05/16/2014 12:04 PM 524,288 NTUSER.DAT{4a5664db-d688-11e1-b53c-842b2b4244af}.TMContainer00000000000000000002.regtrans-ms
05/16/2014 12:04 PM 20 ntuser.ini
08/13/2014 04:33 PM 4,194 ntuser.pol
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Pictures
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Saved Games
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Searches
03/18/2014 12:22 PM <DIR> System Volume Information
05/16/2014 12:04 PM 90 Uvhd-Binding
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> Videos
05/16/2014 12:04 PM <DIR> WINDOWS
9 File(s) 1,859,792 bytes
15 Dir(s) 376,786,944 bytes free
C:\Users\Administrator.GDM>
Here it says, I have only ~376MB free. This I can also confirm when running a following command:
PS E:\> Get-Volume -DriveLetter E
DriveLetter FileSystemLabel FileSystem DriveType HealthStatus SizeRemaining Size
E User Disk NTFS Fixed Healthy 359.33
MB 1022.93 MB
When I try to run following 'Optimize-Volume -DriveLetter E -ReTrim -Verbose', I get this:
PS E:\> Optimize-Volume -DriveLetter E -ReTrim -Verbose
VERBOSE: Invoking retrim on User Disk (E:)...
VERBOSE: Performing pass 1:
VERBOSE: Retrim: 0% complete...
VERBOSE: Retrim: 100% complete.
VERBOSE:
Post Defragmentation Report:
VERBOSE:
Volume Information:
VERBOSE: Volume size = 1022.93 MB
VERBOSE: Cluster size = 4 KB
VERBOSE: Used space = 153.38 MB
VERBOSE: Free space = 869.55 MB
VERBOSE:
Allocation Units:
VERBOSE: Slab count = 31
VERBOSE: Slab size = 32 MB
VERBOSE: Slab alignment = 31.93 MB
VERBOSE: In-use slabs = 5
VERBOSE:
Retrim:
VERBOSE: Backed allocations = 6
VERBOSE: Allocations trimmed = 1
VERBOSE: Total space trimmed = 30.99 MB
As you can see, one output says, I have 357MB free, the other says, I have 800MB free ..
I am checking more ..

OEL5 disk size

Hi All,
I've just installed OEL5 update 3. I have a problem understanding my disk size.
If I type: fdisk -l |grep Disk I got 2 lines:
Disk /dev/sda 320.0 GB
Disk /dev/sdb 250.0 GB
that make sense to me cause it's exactly my hard disk on the hardware, but if I type df - K , i got:
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 233G Mounted on /
/dev/sdb1 104M Mounted on /boot
tmpfd 4G Mounted on /dev/shm
What's wrong with this configuration, where is the 320 GB disk?
Thanks a lot
Claudio

Well, if you read the piece carefully, you knew you have to query the physical volumes of your system (pvdisplay)
that would reveal that the (ntfs formatted) disk was not part of the current lvm configuration.
next, a little search on the big internet shows how you can use ntfs with oel5/rhel5: http://platonic.techfiz.info/2008/10/23/ntfs-support-on-rhel5/

My time machine 3 TB HD was encryption enabled and it took forever. I tried reformattiing, it is online, but, get this Partition map repair failed while adjusting structures to fit current whole disk size. Any comments appreciated.

My time machine 3 TB HD was encryption enabled and it took forever. I tried reformattiing, it is online, but, get this Partition map repair failed while adjusting structures to fit current whole disk size. Any comments appreciated.

This issue has been in discussion (actively) since last August here:
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4218970?start=0&tstart=0
After months and months of new reports, it's pretty clear that this is an Apple Mountain Lion problem and one that Apple needs to address. As one frsutrated user noted :
>>There is no consistent solution for a user. Apple has to supply it. All you can do is submit a bug report to
>> http://www.apple.com/feedback
Please, if you are encountering this problem you will save yourself a lot of wasted time and energey simple by joining me and others in asking Apple to fix this problem: Make a bug report.
Thanks!

Disk utility gives "Error: Partition map repair failed while adjusting structures to fit current whole disk size"

I am getting the following error when running Disk Utility (under ML) on an exteral USB hard drive:
Error: Partition map repair failed while adjusting structures to fit current whole disk size.
I get thsi when I ask Disk Utility to "Repair Disk" at the top level of the disk hierarchy (i.e. not on one of the partitions within the disk but on the disk itself). I was not getting this error with Lion on the same disk before I upgraded from Lion to ML.
It seems like a bug in ML. I found websites where they suggest that you just run Lion's Disk Utility and it will show the disk to be fine.
Any thoughts?

So, I finally seemed to have resolved things with the Seagate 4TB Firewire external drive. If you Google about, you will find a thread on Seagate's own support forum that describes how to disable the sleep function on the drive. You CANNOT ALLOW THE DRIVE TO SLEEP WHILE CONNECTED TO YOUR MAC.
After a lot of reading, here's what I think is happening: the drive goes to sleep, after some period of inactivity, and when you shutdown your Mac, OS X tries to write something to the drive as part of the dismount / disconnect / shutdown process. That fails in some manner, leaving the drive 'corrupted' at the filesystem or partition level.
Then, on the next boot-up, Mountain Lion tells you that it cannot repair the drive and it mounts as read only. Your only fix at that point is to re-partition / re-format and start over (which is big fun with 3TB of data to copy back on to the drive).
If you prevent the drive from sleeping, whenever it's connected to the MacBook, then the above process doesn't occur and voila, the drive just works. So far, I haven't had any problems with about a week of starting / shutting down my MacBook connected to the offending drive (translation: I was going to return the drive, but the problem is clearly with Mac OS X Mountain Lion).

WMV and Disk Size issues

So I am a pretty avid Encore user and I have come into some issues lately and could use some help.
Background-
I filmed a 14 hour conference on SD 16:9 mini dv
I captured 14 hours with Premiere as .AVI - I edited the segments and exported as .AVI
I used Media Encoder to convert the files to NTSC Progressive Widescreen High Quality (.m2v) - Reduced the file size drastically
I then used Media Encoder to convert the .m2v files to .wmv files - Reducing the conference size to 5.65 GB in total.
I then imported the .wmv into Encore - my issues begin
At first, Encore CS4 imported the .wmv files without a problem however the disk size (of 5.65 GB) registered in Encore as around 13 gigs??? Why is that? The .wmv files only consume 5.65 gb on my harddrive. Where is this file size issues coming from?
So then Encore CS4 gets upset that I have exceeded the 8.5 DL Disk size and crashes...
I reopen the program and try to import my .wmv files again (forgot to save like an idiot). 3 of 8 .wmv files import and then Encore starts giving me decoder errors saying I cannot import the rest of the .wmv files...
Can anyone help me with this issue? Im quite confused by all of this. Things seemed to work fine (sorta) at first and now Encore is pissed.
I want to get this 14 hour conference on 1 DL DVD and I thought it would be as simple as getting the files reduced to a size sutable for a 8.5 gb disk. Why is my way of thinking incorrect?
Thanks for any help,
Sam

ssavery wrote:
Thanks everyone for your help.
Im still not giving up.... It's become an obsession at this point. My uncle does this with kids movies for his children. He'll download and compress entire seasons of children shows and put them all on one dvd which he then plays in a dvd player for them to watch. Im currently trying to get ahold of him....
Thanks for the help
Sam
i've done this as well for shows that are never to be seen again for the light of day from the 80s and such... i use VSO Software's "ConvertXtoDVD v4" i ONLY use this for archival purposes of xvid or wmv or stuff that encore would throw fits over. the menus are all mainly default stock stuff. but for these projects i'm not concerned about menus or specific navigation, i just need to get the job done. i can squeeze around 15 hrs of 720x480 on one DL (it compresses the ever living dayligths out of the video... but for most of the source footage... it really doesnt matter at that point, its mostly all VHS archives i use for this program anyway) if you just absolutely HAVE to have a 1 disker, you could check that app out, burn it an see how it looks.
edited to add: that to really squeeze crap in, you can also use a DVDFab program (any ersion should do... Older ones are cheaper) make a disc image with ConvertX, if yiu have alot f footage it may push it beyond the normal boundary of a dvd-dl and fail the burn. So then you can just import the disc image into DVDFab, and choose it to burn to a DVD-DL, and it may compress it by about 3-7% more to fit it. I would NEVER use this method EVER for a client... But if you are just hell-bent on doing 1 disk. Tries these 2 apps out. It may work out if you can live with the compression.
if you do try this, I recommend trying this workflow. Open premiere with your first gem captured AVI. set up your chapters how you want them or whatever, then save each chapter or lecture or segment or whatever as it's own AVI. the. Import all those separately into ConvertX and set it up to play one after the other when each segment ends. [i can't confirm this 100%, because i usually drop in already compressed files... but if for some reason it don't wanna work out... then i would suggest dropping in the mts files instead] (if say you want a new "movie" for each lecture instead, and have chapters per movie that can be done too... But it's more work, but I can expound later if need be) To save time on encoding, set up the menu to be the "minimalist" menu. It's strictly text. Then just create sn ISO. if you donthe full thing, I can almost guarantee you'll have to use DVDFab to burn to disc, because it'll probably be about 5-8% overburn.

"raidctl -l c0t0d0" in T1000 shows incorrect disk size

We are using hardware raid1, set up with raidctl command on our T1000. When I issue "raidctl -l c0t0d0" in our T1000 it shows incorrect disk size of 689.9M, instead of 136G. This seems to have started with 12/1/09 Recommended Patch Cluster for Solaris 10. Is anyone else seeing this and/or know of a fix?

Hello
We've been told to install patch 144017-01 although we've yet to perform this to see if it fixes the problem.
After installing mpt patch 141743-02 or later drive capacity is incorrectly reported
SunOS 5.10: mpt.so.1 patch
Status: RELEASED
Patch Id: 144017-01
READ THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") IN THE LEGAL_LICENSE.TXT
FILE CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS SOFTWARE. BY USING THE SOFTWARE, YOU
AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO ALL OF THE
TERMS, PROMPTLY DESTROY THE UNUSED SOFTWARE.
For further information on patching best practices and resources, please
see the Big Admin Patching Center, http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/patches/
Summary: SunOS 5.10: mpt.so.1 patch
Date: Mar/17/2010
Installation Requirements:
NA
Solaris Release: 10
Sun OS Release: 5.10
Unbundled Product:
Unbundled Release:
Xref: This patch available for x86 as patch 144018
Topic:
SunOS 5.10: mpt.so.1 patch
Relevant Architecture: sparc
BugId's fixed with this patch:
6881276
Changes incorporated in this version:
Patches accumulated and obsoleted by this patch:
Patches which conflict with this patch:
Required Patches:
127127-11 137137-09 139555-08 141444-09 (or greater)
Obsoleted by:
Files Included in this Patch:
/usr/lib/raidcfg/mpt.so.1
/usr/lib/raidcfg/sparcv9/mpt.so.1
Problem Description:
6881276 after installing mpt patch 141743-02 or later drive capacity is incorrectly reported
Revision History:
Patch Installation Instructions:
Please refer to the man pages for instructions on using 'patchadd'
and 'patchrm' commands provided with Solaris.
The following example installs a patch to a standalone machine:
example# patchadd /var/spool/patch/123456-07
The following example removes a patch from a standalone system:
example# patchrm 123456-07
For additional examples please see the appropriate man pages. Any
other special or non-generic installation instructions should be
described below as special instructions.
Special Install Instructions:
None.
README -- Last modified date: Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Disk size problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for