Dispute BK...

Since the credit report is suppose to contain all accurate information, I want to dispute the case # of my BK on my credit reports because it is not the same as on the court documents filed for my case. Should I send in the document that has the correct case number and ask them to validate that with the court and if the court cannot, then please delete.....or how should I do this ? FYI.....my bk was filed May 2009 and discharged Sept 2009 Thank you!

Scupra wrote:
Andy77 wrote:
Since the credit report is suppose to contain all accurate information, I want to dispute the case # of my BK on my credit reports because it is not the same as on the court documents filed for my case. Should I send in the document that has the correct case number and ask them to validate that with the court and if the court cannot, then please delete.....or how should I do this ? FYI.....my bk was filed May 2009 and discharged Sept 2009 Thank you! The courts don't provide any info to the CRA's if I remember correctly. There is 3rd party reporting agencies and the BK is public record. Maybe they fix it, maybe they don't.. Either way I don't see them deleting the BK. Why are you wanting the correct case number to show?My guess would be the OP is fishing for a way to dispute valid information and get the BK removed... good luck with that one. Andy77 wrote:
It was my understanding that only accurate info should be on your CR. If iit stays as is, that is not accurate. So, my thinking is, if they cannot get it corrected that means its not accurate and the case number, as is, does not belog to me because its wrong So, why would that not get deleted ? It is true I filed a BK, but not with that number As said... it's valid infomation. A typographically error with the case # isn't going to get the BK deleted... the public record info is readily available and the case # can be easily corrected. Nice fishing expedition though....

Similar Messages

Re: Diff: Linkage of Credit memo and Dispute Case in EHP 4 and EHP5

Dear Richard,
I'm facing same issue in my system.
I've already made the customization in my system but still i'm facing issue.
I'm not able to get credit in my dispute case. Could you please help me out.
Also help me to understand your below statement.
"And make sure the business adapts the correct process: When you reverse a charge on a debit invoice you have to make sure the credit is properly linked to the debit note"
Best Regards,
Jain

Please note you have to perform the config - and then run the FOAP programs to attach and then match the credit to the dispute.
Please note the open item within the dispute will be cleared and a residual posted against the customer whilst clearing the credit note.

Diff: Linkage of Credit memo and Dispute Case in EHP 4 and EHP5

Hi Experts
I am bit confused ...on the Linkage of Credit memo and Dispute Case in EHP 4 and EHP5.
Does the following statement is valid in EHP4 or EHP5.
"You can add a credit to a dispute to close it or reduce the amount disputed."
If it is possible in EHP 5 or EHP 4, please let me know what is the procedure to follow?
If i need to activate anything in SFW5, please provide what is the Business function i need to activate.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Meenkashi.N

Linking a credit note has nothing to do with EHP4 or 5. You have to do a config sertting:
Dispute Management-Process Integration with Accounts Receivable Accounting-Assignment of Open Credits and Payments-Activate Assignment of Open Credits and Payments
And make sure the business adapts the correct process: When you reverse a charge on a debit invoice you have to make sure the credit is properly linked to the debit note.
If this is the case then the credit will show up in the dispute case.
Rgds,
Richard

Customer line items ...dispute case

Friends,
when i go into the customer line item report (FBL5N) and click on a record it opens up a page where we see a button for 'Dispute Case'and i went there and changed the reason for case and saved it and came back to the fbl5n customer line item screen and checked the record against which i changed the reason for case, but it didnt changed the reasion on the record but when i go into the record and try to view it in additional details it shows me the one i have made changes. not able to understand why it is not showing in the list of line items when it is showing inside the record details that it has been changed,even i did refreshed it . Our end user wants to see the changed reason code on the line items page wich is on the AR side when we change the reason for case on the dispute side.
its kind of urgent please put some light onto it, any help would be highly appreciable...
Thanks
Jay

sounds like changing the ALE from system 1 to the other system.
However I doubt it will be that easy.
I believe that could should contact SAP SLO to work out the best route for data migration.

Disputing Vendor invoices

Has anybody got the SAP FSCM dispute management process to work for Vendor invoices?
I dont believe this should work - but there might be some special config or process that I am aware of.

Hi Mark,
Dispute Management for vendor invoices should not work. After FSCM itself is designed from AR side only.
But was just giving a thought if we could use it for limited part but assuming we create an RMS with vendor elements, first point is how do we create dispute cases - Using the customer disputed objects - but shouldnt sap standard check for an existence of customer? Also the standard amounts will not be updated as per the accounting document.
But don't you feel a standard case management/records management should be enough for tracking vendor disputes though a lot of work has to be done in terms of designing the solution. But just tracking of the disputes and notes should be fine right.
Regards,
Ravi

I cancelled my service, was charged for service which was not provided, and I am unable to find a way to dispute or to pay my bill.

To begin, what ADA-compliant options are available to work with a service representative? I've never found the online chat service support to be available during my waking hours after checking over the last week. I can't find a contact email for support, either. I've been instructed on several occasions that I will need to make a voice call for customer service, but unfortunately, this will not be possible. I will require text-format assistance from customer support to address two issues which I am unable to solve on my own:
1) I was charged for service following the cancellation of my service; this includes a period following cancellation during which no service was provided. After working with a representative in person, I was told that my final bill would be adjusted to reflect the legally billable amount. This was three weeks ago and I haven't received a response, and I haven't been able to find a way to pursue a resolution - What can I do to help move this process forward?
2) It appears I will be unable to pay my bill after this dispute has been reviewed. My phone number is no longer with Verizon. The online bill payment login requires a phone number - I have never been provided with any other account number. Unfortunately, Verizon appears to close access to online bill payment when the phone number is transferred, even to accounts with unpaid invoice amounts. How can I pay my bill online?

kananga wrote:
To begin, what ADA-compliant options are available to work with a service representative? Good question, and one that I don't know the answer to. Does anything on this page help? Products & Services Overview | Verizon Wireless
1) I was charged for service following the cancellation of my service; this includes a period following cancellation during which no service was provided. Service is normally billed through the end of the billing cycle, whether service is provided or not. "Cancellations will become effective on the last day of that month’s billing cycle, and you are responsible for all charges incurred until then." After working with a representative in person, I was told that my final bill would be adjusted to reflect the legally billable amount. According to their legal docs, the "leagally billable amount" is through the end of the billing cycle. This was three weeks ago and I haven't received a response, and I haven't been able to find a way to pursue a resolution - What can I do to help move this process forward?
2) It appears I will be unable to pay my bill after this dispute has been reviewed. My phone number is no longer with Verizon. The online bill payment login requires a phone number - I have never been provided with any other account number. Unfortunately, Verizon appears to close access to online bill payment when the phone number is transferred, even to accounts with unpaid invoice amounts. How can I pay my bill online? You cannot pay online once the account is cancelled. You will be mailed a paper copy of the final bill, and you can mail a check, or possibly call in and pay over the phone. But online is no longer an option once the account is cancelled.

FI: Open Items and Disputes

Hi Experts,
I would like to know how to retrieve the FI Open items. Basically the SAP tables and criteria to fetch all Open Items.
Also, how to identify the disputes in the items.
Best Regards,
Kurtt

Hi Gautham,
I would like to confirm if the customer open items can be found in table BSID? Thanks so much!
Best Regards,
Kurtt

Collections Worklist: Total dispute amt is not a sumation of the disputes

Hi All,
I have a weird problem in my collections worklist at the moment where, when the list is generated, on the outer screen before your drill into the Business Partner, the value for "Disputed Amount" does not match the sum of the open disputes for that BP.
I have tried de-activating all of the BAdI implementations we had in place for various minor changes but it has had no affect. When I debug in the BAdI "UDM_WL_ITEM_CREATE_C" - "Enhancement of worklist items on creation" the BP is coming in with a reduced list of dispute cases or in some cases none at all.
From about 3 months ago it seems that our disputes are not being picked up to be added to the overall amount.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Brenton.

You realise this is not Apple?
It is a community forum, of Apple users like yourself.
It does sound like you are dealing with someone else anyway, such as your phone company. Dispute the charge with your Credit company, which shouldn't be a problem since it is fairly obviously a double charge.
And yes stand up for what is right, whoever it is is just a typical bureaucracy and straightening them out takes persistence.
Peter

Table for Dispute case ID and accounting document number

Hi,
For a given dispute case ID (EXT_KEY) I am unable to find the corresponding accounting document number ( BELNR ) for this dispute case. I am able to see the accounting document for the dispute case on the transaction UDM_DISPUTE but then I am not finding the same in any tables. Can anyone let me know in which table can I find the relationship to determine this. Thanks in advance.
Rgds,
Sowmya

Hi Sowmya,
check the table UDMCASEATTR00.it contains all the details about disputemanagement
please reward poitns if helpful

How to relate dispute case for a AR document

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement to change the reason code change date of dispute case(DIspute management) for the related AR document.
Basically i am posting a AR document through BAPI. Now i wanted to take the last dunned date(MADAT) and find the related dispute case after that change the reason code change date using last dunned date.
so my question how to relate relevent dispute case for the AR document?
Thanks advance.
Regards,
Radhakrishna.

Hi.............
Better and simplest way you can get it through a simple qury report. Create a query by joining two tables ODLN and OINV. OINV's docdate means the closing date of delivery challan.
Regards,

HT201304 What happens if you are disputing an in-app purchase with a vendor that is in CHina and is not understanding your issue and refuses to add the disputed purchase or refund the purchase?

I made an in app purchase and the game (Happy Farm) crashed but I completed the purchase on my iPad's Home screen because the Confirm purchase window popped up before I could relaunch the game. When I launched the game the purchase (which was Gems) was not showing so I took a screen shot of the game window showing 211 diamonds, which was the amount I started with, (the purchase was for 258 gems so my total should be 499). I then took a screenshot of myhome screen showing the time of day. I went back to the game repurchased the same amount, the app did not crash this time and I was credited with correct about of gems 211 +258 = 499... Took a snapshot of that screen. went back to my home screen and took a screen shot to show the time again. Well after sending Happy Farm all of this evidence, they responded that they gave me all the gems and I just used them all. I don't believe that they understand that my app crashed and during the 1st transaction and I clicked the Buy button (in the Confirm purchase window) on my Home screen not in the App, got charged but did NOT recieve the gems when I relaunched the app. I have more proof than most people and they are still calling me a liar... I need intervention from iTunes App store and I don't know how to get them to mediate this dispute. Do you know how I can get in touch with the App store?

https://getsupport.apple.com/Issues.action

I was in a car collision and need proof of my location when I called 911. The Police Dept., refused to respond, since there were no injuries. Now, I have a dispute with the other driver who is falsely stating accident happened at another intersection. I

I was in a car collision and need proof of my location when I called 911. The Police Dept., refused to respond, since there were no injuries.
Now, I have a dispute with the other driver who is falsely stating accident happened at another intersection. In addition of calling 911 twice, I also took pictures of damages. Unfortunately, I did not take pictures of the intersection signs.
My AT&T carrier states that this info. can only be disclosed by a subpoena. My insurance carrier states that they will not subpoena this info., since it is a civil case only.
The Police Department does not keep records of calls they do not attend to.
How can I get this location info. from my i phone device if at all possible?
Thanks,
Pecosa
iPhone 4, iOS 6.0.1

Johnathan Burger,
I did take photos of the damages to car and license plates, but NOT the intersection signs.
How do I get the GPS Data in the exit data of photos? Please advise.
Thanks,
Message was edited by: Pecosa
Message was edited by: Pecosa

Lock at a Customer level - while creating a dispute or working on the ColWL

Please, provide workarounds for:
SAP creates a lock at a Customer level while doing the following activities
u2022     Clearing an item
u2022     Creation of a Dispute case
u2022     Working on Collections worklist for a particular customer
As a result of the lock at the customer level, no other user can work on the same customer at the same time.
Many thanks,
Mario.

Hi Mario,
This is how system is supposed to work, so that only one user can work at a time on a particular customer. Without such a control, things could go wrong. Eg. You might be making a payment to the customer invoice, simulataneously other user could be trying to clear the same invoice using some credit memo.
So there is not workaround.
Thanks
Krishna

How do I dispute a copyright claim against a video i made using a trailer in iMovie? The only content I used was the video I shot of friends daughter on a merry-go-round.IMovie had the music etc that I used.

How do I dispute a copyright claim against a video i made using a trailer in iMovie? The only content I used was the video I shot of friends daughter on a merry-go-round.IMovie had the music etc that I used. Here's the message It gives a number of options to choose from if I want to dispute the claim but I don't know which one this would come under. Several obviously don't apply and of the ones left I don't know which content that is in IMovie that I use comes under. "This video is my original content and I own the rights to it" "I have a license or written permission of the property rights holder to use this material" "My use of the content meets the legal requirements for fair use of fair dealing under applicable copyright laws" or "The content is in the public domain or is not eligible for copright protection."

You want to use the "I have a license..." option, since clearly the music is not yours, but Apple has granted you a license.
For your license, see this document, section 2.M. http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/iMovie.pdf
For more on this irritating problem and why it is so hard to solve, see this article. (It is a problem for Final Cut Pro users as well.)
http://www.larryjordan.biz/app_bin/wordpress/archives/1842

Is there a way to hide some reason codes in dispute management without deleting?

Within SAP Dispute management (UDM_DISPUTE) we would like to remove some of the available reason codes in the drop down on the search screen and available to assign drop down, but not physically delete them. Is there a way to do this?
I know if I physically delete them out of the Reason code list (SPRO -> FSCM -> dispute management -> Dispute Case Processing -> Case types -> Create Values for Attribute "Reason") then if an old dispute case that used that reason code is displayed, the four digit number code will be displayed rather than the description. So we would prefer to not physically delete the code / description from the reason codes but somehow make them non-display, or inactive.
Any thoughts on this?

Hello Stephen,
you may consider the functionality "personal list", putting all valid reason codes in and leaving out those you do not want to show. Maybe your Authorisation / Security Team can also help you performing this exercise for all affected users at once.
Regards,
Christoph

Error in creating Dispute case

Hello Experts,
i got this error in su53
Evaluation of Last Failed Authorization Check of User KHPSAROM
Description                                                                                Authorization values
User Name                      KHPSAROM     Authorization Object                     CPE_SETTIN
System                         FCP          Client                                   400
Date                           15.10.2010   Time                                     13:34:30
Instnce                        fghsrv014    Profile Parameter auth/new buffering     4
    Authorization check failed
   Object Class AAAB Cross-application Authorization Objects
     Authorization Obj. CPE_SETTIN Commodity Pricing Engine: General Settings
       Authorization Field ACTVT Activity
                                                                                03
   User's Authorization Data KHPSAROM
   Object Class AAAB       Cross-application Authorization Objects
     Authorization Object CPE_SETTIN Commodity Pricing Engine: General Settings
       Authorizat. T-FD96017500 Commodity Pricing Engine: General Settings
         Profl. T-FD960175   Profile for role Z:ROLE_AR_ARACC
         Role Z:ROLE_AR_ARACC
         Authorization Field ACTVT Activity
                                                                                03
User cannot create dispute case
try to solve it
Thanks and regards
Dhaval Thaker

To disspell any doubts, SU53 shows the last failed auth check which the user invoked in a program, immediately before executing Su53. It is not necessarily the correct one to assign!
Melissa Salamone wrote:
> And this is way out from left field but I actually had this happen to me a week or two ago - double check the role and make sure that authorization is actually there. I had one pop where it showed an authorization that was an old version of the role but not in the current version.
>
I assume by this that you are referring to profile name collisions. This has two common causes:
The SID ID's of PROD, QAS and DEV etc systems all have the same identical characters in the 1st and the 3rd place. Only these two are used in the generation of the profile name. Search for "AGR_NUM_2" for more infos and options.
Another (IMO more likely possibility) is that which SAP Note 1373111 describes in the reason codes of the FOR USER construct. The check might infact have been performed against a different user ID...
Please run the same with an ST01 trace on and check the reason code (if your kernel release is high enough).
Personally I am rather sceptical about this new mechanism in the wild. The old mechanism via FM AUTHORITY_CHECK at least gave us a where-usd-list and when jumping from the trace to the source it was clear what the developer had intended to do, even if they have already left the building...
Cheers,
Julius

Dispute BK...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for