DOCUMENTATION - Cisco Unified Workforce Optimization - Call Recording

Hello,
I'm trying to sell the Cisco Unified Workforce Optimization - Call Recording option in a customer, but he is asking me to send him some documentation about capacities and functionalities. I'm not able to find this kind of information of the website. Can anybody help me? Thanks!

Hi,
Please check the following link. hope this helps!!!
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8293/products_data_sheets_list.html
Thanks,
Dass
Please rate useful posts

Similar Messages

  • Cisco Unified Workforce Optimization Licensing

    Hello All, I'm Implementing Cisco Unified Workforce Optimization primarily for call recording but I am confused on the licensing. I received a part code of CCX-10-CR-LIC but does this get registered to the CCX, should it go against the QC application or have I got the incorrect part completely? 
    Thanks in advance 
    Paul

    Hi George, I'm having problems syncing the CC database. The user is uccxworkforce by default but I dont remember defining this user. The check list of QC says to check the user password. I did create the user a s a normal end user in cucm then in ccx gave it admon rights so it should have access to the data base but I still get an error about SyncServer error Exception while getting DB connection (-1)
    any ideas?
    p.s. I hate this product it is so difficult to install.

  • Agent Automatic Call Recording

    Hi,
    I want to save agent voice records on UCCX but I do not want to use ‘Voice Contact Work Flow List’ method. (http://dreamforccie.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/automatic-call-recording-at-uccx/)
    I want store all agent voice records out side of the UCCX server storage (external storage). Because I will some storage problems when i store all records in the UCCX server.
    Is there any way to make this, 3th party or etc. ??

    There is a Cisco solution: Cisco Unified Workforce Optimization.
    And then there are all kinds of 3rd party solutions out there to choose from.
    Anthony Holloway
    Please use the star ratings to help drive great content to the top of searches.

  • Failed to create the CTI Route Point and corresponding Line on Cisco Unified CM.

    Dear All
               Kindly I got that message "Failed to create the CTI Route Point and corresponding Line on Cisco Unified CM." When I am trying to create Trigger on the UCCX for an Application,
    Bye the way I create Call Control Group and it gives me OK, and I create it from Subsystem>Cisco Unified CM Telephony>Call Control Group
    and Type CTI Ports: 4 | Inbound | Starting DN : 9000 "Nothing in my route pattern report have created CTI numbers"
    So Appreciate your help to avoid that errors raised when I am trying to create new prompts 
    Thanks 
    Ahmed Samir Yosuef 
    Integration Manager

    Let me know the deployment model and Node details

  • Cisco Unified WFO - Call Recording and Quality Management with Extension Mobility agents

    Hi All,
    We're considering Cisco Unified WFO - Call Recording and Quality Management for a customer running UCCX 8.0, agents on multiple WAN sites, all agents using extension mobility.
    The documentation I've been able to find describes three different recording methods:
    Using Desktop Recording service (Endpoint) to record from an agent’s desktop.
    Server Recording - Uses SPAN (not so good for remote sites)
    Network Recording - Uses CUCM recording service / SIP trunk / phone's built in bridge.
    Network recording or Desktop recording should be suitable for the customer but it seems that Extension mobility is not supported.  Extension Mobility is not mentioned in the 8.5 installation guide, it is mentioned as ‘not supported’ in the 8.0 guide as follows:
    'Server Recording and Network Recording have the following limitations:
    • Extension mobility is not supported.'
    Neither version's documentation specifically mention extension mobility in relation to the desktop recording method, though I realise this is a similar approach to the 'server recording' method.
    So the question I have is:  Is extension mobility supported in any way on version 8.0, or version 8.5 for recording?  And if so which recording method(s) are supported?
    Thanks,
    Jonathan

    Hi,
    I had more luck asking questions over at the Calabrio forum - they make the software and Cisco re-brand a version of it - there is some good info on their portal (http://portal.calabrio.com), you have to register but it's fairly painless.  The answer I got was:
    "QM Desktop recording has always supported extention mobility as it determines the recorded user by the desktop user's login. Extention mobility was not supported for Server and Network recording until the Calabrio QM 8.6.2 release in April 2011 and will be added to Cisco QM starting with QM 8.5.2 in June 2011"
    Regards,
    Jonathan

  • Ask the Expert : Call Recording with Cisco Unified Communication Manager (UCM)

    Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation.  This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about Cisco Unified CM call recording solution that provides the ability to record customer conversations for compliance purpose. This topic will cover an overview, configuration and troubleshooting of the call recording feature.
    Monday, January 19th, 2015 to Friday, January 30th, 2015
    Harmit Singh is a technical leader with the High Touch Technical Services (HTTS) and Technical Assistance Center (TAC) Unified Communications teams based in Bangalore. He has broad experience in Cisco Unified Communications infrastructure solutions. He has 10 years of experience working with large enterprise and service provider networks. He also holds CCIE certifications (#20012) in Voice and Collaboration as well as Red Hat and VMware certifications.
    Mohammed Noorulla Khan is a customer support engineer in High-Touch Technical Services (HTTS)  Unified Communications teams based in Bangalore. His areas of expertise include Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Gateways, and Jabber. He has over 6 years of industry experience working with large enterprise and service provider networks. He also holds CCIE certifications (#35741) in Voice and VMware certifications.
    ** Remember to use the rating system to let Mohammed and Harmit know if you've received an adequate response.  **
    Because of the volume expected during this event, the experts might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Collaboration, Voice and Video  community, subcommunity, IP Telephony, shortly after the event. This event lasts through January 30th 2015. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and those of other Cisco Support Community members.

    Hi Maheshwar,
    Thank you for your query. Please find my response below:
    1> Do we support recording with HCS environment and which 3rd party vendors are validated with HCS based call control 10.1.1?
    Answer: Whether you use a standalone UCM cluster, UCCE or HCS, call recording would be supported across the board in the same manner.
    Please refer to the following link:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/hcs-cc/10_0_1/Install_and_Config/CHCS_BK_ICC270D0_00_installing-and-configuring-cisco-hcs/CHCS_BK_ICC270D0_00_installing-and-configuring-cisco-hcs_chapter_011.html#CHCS_RF_T1105284_00
    Option
    Notes
    Recording
    All Recording applications that are supported by Unified CCE are supported on HCS for CC. For details, see Recording section in Agent and Supervisor Capabilities.
    With respect to which 3rd party vendors have been validated, marketplace.cisco.com is a good place to crosscheck this info. You will find a Cisco Compatible Logo against the partners listed there. The logo is used to signify that the PARTNER product has undergone technical interoperability testing with the Cisco product specified. The interoperability testing is conducted by a third party laboratory based on testing criteria set forth by Cisco. PARTNER is solely responsible for the support and warranty of its product. Placement of the PARTNER product or information pertaining thereto, on the Cisco Marketplace website does not constitute an offer to sell the PARTNER product in any way. For further information on the PARTNER products, please visit the PARTNER company website.
    Please refer to the following link and use the search field under Collaboration Technology:
    https://marketplace.cisco.com/catalog/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search[q]=&search[technology_category_ids]=23%2C24%2C197%2C1940%2C1941%2C1921%2C1576%2C1897%2C1983%2C2418%2C26%2C198%2C1904&search[order]=tier&per_page=20&_=1421663854257&ts=1421663855441
    2> Which end points are supported for recording via HCS call control?
    Answer: The following link should help clarify this:
    http://solutionpartner.cisco.com/web/sip/wiki/-/wiki/Main/Unified+CM+Silent+Monitoring+Recording+Supported+Device+Matrix
    Please let us know if you have any follow up questions. Hope this is helpful.
    Regards,
    Harmit Singh.

  • Cisco Unified WFO - Call Recording and Quality Management stops recording with conferenced translator

    I'm having an issue whenever one of our employee's conferences in an external translator, as soon as they bridge the customer into the call with the translator QM stops recording.  I can hear the intial conversation with the customer, and then the employee put the customer on hold and call the translator service.  Only when the two are bridged together the call always stops recording. 
    We are performing all recording on the server side, and are not using Quality Manager Desktop agents.
    Any help would be much appreciated.  Thanks!
    -Chris                   

    So I found the following information listed below.  I don't manage the Cisco Unified CM portion of our telco system.  Can we limited the ourselves to a single Codec, and would this even resolve the issue.  Does this cause other issues if we didn't limit the devices that are recording to a single codec?
    Recording IssuesThis topic explains how to diagnose and resolve problems that occur with contact
    recordings.
    Calls for devices configured for Network Recording drop when you try to conference
    or transfer a call.
    Symptom. When you try to transfer or conference a call and one or more devices on
    the call configured for network recording, the transfer or conference fails and
    parties drop off of the call.
    Cause. Cisco Unified CM does not support codec changes for devices that are
    configured for call recording. The codec must remain the same throughout the life
    of the call. For conference calls, the conference bridge must support the codec
    used before the conference completes.
    Solution. Update the Cisco Unified CM configuration to ensure that no codec
    changes occur for network recorded devices.

  • Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.1(1). recording

    Dear all,i have Cisco Unified Communications Manager 6.1(1).
    i need support for recored conversation at my call manager, i know how to enable recording from call manager but i don't know how to save this conversation by SIP for exammple
    2-how to enable log missed call at my phone
    thanks

    UCM only provides the framework for third-party monitoring and recording products to invoke. There are a lot of options but not many actually utilize this framework. NICE and Witness are two offerings that do. I'm sure others will have other suggestions as well. This has been covered on the forum many times before.

  • Since you don't allow emails any more – I suspect because of the numerous complaints with your service and the way you treat people that you don't want documented, I am calling and I want this call recorded for future reference. I have been a long time fa

    Since you don’t allow emails any more – I suspect because of the numerous complaints with your service and the way you treat people that you don’t want documented, I am calling and I want this call recorded for future reference.
    I have been a long time faithful customer of vzw and although the past year I have been late on payments many times and really couldn’t afford your exorbitant prices for services lots of other companies offer sometimes three times cheaper than what you charge, I have hung in there trying my best to meet my obligations.
    This month has been no exception. You don’t know the background; the whole story of people’s lives. I know you could care less because all you care about is the profit-the money that comes in.
    I was told when I agreed to pay my bill on the third per the recorded message that I had 14 days to pay…you cut me off anyway. The phones are not the tissue; your suspending my service means I cannot work. I may lose my job…how do you justify that? In any case? The least you could do would be to keep 4986 on and cut the phones off. But no. You refuse to compromise and meet the basic needs of your customer. What does that say about your company? I tried to call back on three separate occasions to tell you I couldn’t pay because of unexpected expenses but couldn’t get out of the automated system…sadly couldn’t get to a real person which also speaks volumes to me.
    All this tells me this is a company I don’t wish to be affiliated with any more. As soon as I can, I will discontinue service with you…I know you could care less. I will honor the remaining portion of the contract but that’s it. You don’t deserve my business. I am a good, hardworking person who, at the sacrifice of myself and my needs, always pays her bills…albeit late at times. I realize others tell you stories and lies to justify themselves. That’s not me. If you knew what I had been through the last 7 yrs you would marvel that I am  still on my feet…don’t judge too quickly. You could be wrong…and in my eyes you are by doing this to me.
    God will see us through this extremely scary time of that I have no doubt. No thanks to your company and lack of understanding and mercy. I am doing the best I can. Sadly you are not.
    See I have choices. MANY choices of providers for services you offer. I don’t have to be treated like this. I don’t have to succumb to your coldness and callousness. I intend to choose better (and cheaper). If your company doesn’t get the “people factor” back you will be sorry.

    Problem here is you admit you cannot afford the service.
    And you want to blame Verizon for losing a job because you have no cell phone.
    If your job depends on that phone I would pay it on time every time if you need a job to pay your bill.
    No other service is going to treat you any different. And if you cannot afford Verizon's monthly invoice how are you going to afford new devices, activation fees, possible security deposits on any other cellular carrier? You can't.
    Also if you made an arraignment to pay and then decide you cannot do so, why should Verizon extend you service or credit, or why is it you want to use the service and data and not pay for it as agreed.
    Get a prepay phone. Its evident the cost is too high for you to afford on post pay.
    Good Luck

  • Cisco Unified Call Studio 8.5

    I need to write an app using
    Cisco Unified Call Studiom this app will run every 30 secs do some DB query and make outbound calls, I see that the START of Call element is the only thing I have to Start a call, my application will not get any call, any ideas? thanks.
    [email protected]
    thanks.

    Studio 8.0 installs on XP and Vista. Studio 8.5 installs on Windows 7, Vista, XP.
    There are no real performance issues that Cisco could object to if the above operating systems were "guest O/S" on a VMware ESX server - it's not the same situation as the CVP servers, where they do have firm guidelines.
    Studio works in this environment and I have customers who run Studio on a "guest O/S" - Cisco did not say specifically that this would be an issue.
    But I don't have any documents that confirm that this is OK.
    Regards,
    Geoff

  • Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 8.5 and Call Manager 8.5 on single ESXi

    Does Cisco support 2 virtual machines (on ESXi), one for Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 8.5 and one for Call Manager 8.5?
    I have blade ucs b200.
    Thanks a lot, Svetomir

    Yes it is supported. Check this out http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_Virtualization_Sizing_Guidelines#Sizing_Examples
    GP.
    Pls rate helpful posts by clicking on stars below the post !!

  • Is there any option on Cisco Unified CM Administration 9.1.1 to show caller ID number when using MOBILITY option?

    Dear All,
    I am using Cisco Unified CM Administration 9.1.1 and MOBILITY works fine.
    However  when somebody calls from external phone number into internal user number and MOBILITY option is ON and obviously, forwards the call for the user's cell.....in this case user can see only main company number, but not a caller number.
    So, is there any option to change it?  
    Thank you

    Go to the GW and run some debugs to find out exactly what you're sending, chances are, your telco is overwriting the original called number as it's nor part of your DID range.
    HTH
    java
    if this helps, please rate
    www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

  • Cisco Unified Operations Manager 8.0 - Attempted Calls

    Hi All
    I'm running CUOM 8.0, I can see in the call statistics graph that there are quite alot of attempted calls as per the attached screenshot, can anyone advise what is determined as an attempted call within CUOM and if there is anyway I see what these calls were.
    Regards
    Nick

    Hello,
    you can see the attempted calls only in the CDR's of CUCM or if you installed the CUSM in Administration "UC Management Station" >> "Service Monitor" >> "CDR Call Record Reports" or "QVTC Report".
    Kind regards,
    Marcel Ammann
    P.S.: Rate helpful post's

  • Ask the Expert: Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCX) Version 10.0 - Upgrade, Migration, and New Features Overview

                With Abhiram Kramadhati 
    Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about the upgrade, migration methods, and new features of the latest released Version 10.0 of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCX) with Cisco expert Abhiram Kramadhati.
    Abhiram will address the following on the latest release of Cisco UCCX Version 10.0:
    Installation
    Upgrade from previous versions - both Linux and Windows   
    Migration from MCS to Cisco UCS environment - Different methods and best practices
    New features - Overview and limitations
    This discussion will center on install and upgrade best practices, changes in hardware support, and migration methods from MCS to Cisco UCS. He can also briefly discuss the new features introduced in 10.0. The discussion focuses the latest versions, but queries about general Cisco UCCX topics can be addressed too if time allows.
    Abhiram Kramadhati is an engineer with the Contact Center Backbone group. He has been working with Cisco UCCX since he joined Cisco. During two years at Cisco, he has built his expertise around Cisco UCCX telephony applications, Java Telephony API (JTAPI) integration, Cisco UCCX system behavior, LDAP components, and Cisco UCCX as IP interactive voice response in Unified Contact Center Enterprise (UCCE) environments. He also works on other technologies, including Unified Communications Manager and UCCE. He has been involved in many technical escalations in the Asia Pacific region. Abhiram also holds a CCIE in voice (40065).
    For more details about this topic, refer to the recently published Tech-Talk Video and Blog.
    Remember to use the rating system to let Abhiram know if you have received an adequate response. 
    Abhiram might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Voice, Video, and Collaboration  community,  sub-community, Contact Center discussion forum shortly after the event. This event lasts through January 31, 2014. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.

    Hi Anurag,
    Thanks for your questions.
    1:Is there change in DB architecture as CUIC is the only option as compared to previous linux version UCCX ?
    I assume this is from the tables regarding historical data. The database schema essentially remains the same since UCCX 9.0 had CUIC too and we had a seperate DB Space for CUIC and we still continue with that. The traditional historical tables remain and the replication process remains the same too.
    2:Is there any version change for Linux OS used as VOS,
    The Linux version is Red Hat Linux 5. To be precise:
    [root@uccx10pub /]# cat etc/redhat-release
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.7 (Tikanga)
    3:Is there any API architecture change in UCCX 10 from previous releases ?
    I can answer this more of an overview. The only enhancement in the API side is the introduction of REST API step in the script editor. You can now make REST calls from the script and this ofcourse opens up a whole new world of possiblities.
    4:Since from UCCX 10 , we can only use either CAD or Finnesse at one  time, whats the impact of changing this after some time in production,  let say , i used CAD for 2 months and then i decided to move to Finesse,  whats the impact ? or is it a smooth change as switching CUIC and HRC  in previoius release ?
    For the scenario you mentioned, there is absolutely no problem. The point to note is that the Finesse services are activated/deactivated but the CAD desktop services are ALWAYS running. The only condition to keep in mind is that you can use ONLY ONE type of agent desktop at any time.  Also if Finesse is not used and CAD operations are used extensively, it is advisable to shutdown the Finesse service.
    5:Is 3rd Party UCS hardware supported by UCCX 10 instead of using Cisco manufactured UCS , can i use HP hardware for Virtualisation ?
    Yes, it can be used. This is something called as "Third party specs based specification". The most important things seen for compatibility are:
    Inter CPU Model
    It it is on thVMWare Hardware Compatibilty List
    You can get more information about this on the "Can I use this server?" section of UC Virtualized Hardware page:
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/UC_Virtualization_Supported_Hardware#.22Can_I_use_this_server.3F.22
    6:Is Host name change supported?
    Yes, the hostname change is supported. The prcocedure is documented in the UCCX 10.0 Administration Guide:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_10_0/configuration/guide/UCCX_BK_W1AF9DDD_00_uccx-admin-guide-10.0.pdf (Pg 168)
    Cheers,
    Abhiram Kramadhati

  • On demand call recording on QM server with CUCM

    Hi ,
    I have a customer who wants to enable on-demand call recording on QM server .
    Is there a plugin that needs to be installed on Cisco side to make it happen .
    QM Server 9.0.1.57
    Calabrio Call Recording: 8.8.1.57
    Calabrio Quality Management: 8.8.1.57
    Call Manager 9.1.1
    UCCX 9.0.2
    or any infomation regarding that would be helpful
    Thank you

    This is something I have not done before, but I recall seeing the feature for IP Phones.  It was an IP Phone Service which showed a menu for starting and stopping recordings for workers without a PC.
    On the QM 9.0 Data sheet, the feature is mentioned in the following bullet point:
    - The ability to control recording for manual start,  pause, and add metadata through Cisco Agent Desktop or Calabrio recording control browser or IP phone applications
    Source: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/custcosw/ps5693/ps8293/data_sheet_c78-710576.html#wp9000180
    I'm looking for the documentation to configure this feature.  Unfortunately, Calabrio has their own documentation and support site @ portal.calabrio.com which only Cisco partners can access (something I am not).  The answer may reside there.  I'll post back if I find the IP Phone Service URL to use.
    Anthony Holloway
    Please use the star ratings to help drive great content to the top of searches.

Maybe you are looking for